Effects of a pharmaceutical care intervention on clinical outcomes and patient adherence in coronary heart disease: the MIMeRiC randomized controlled trial

Components of pharmacist-led medication reviews and their relationship to outcomes: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacist-led medication reviews are an established intervention to support patients prescribed multiple medicines or with complex medication regimes. For this systematic review, a medication review was defined as 'a consultation between a pharmacist and a patient to review the patient's total medicines use with a view to improve patient health outcomes and minimise medicines-related problems'. It is not known how varying approaches to medication reviews lead to different outcomes.

AIM

To explore the common themes associated with positive outcomes from pharmacist-led medication reviews.

METHOD

Randomised controlled trials of pharmacist-led medication reviews in adults aged 18 years and over were included. The search terms used in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were "medication review", "pharmacist", "randomised controlled trial" and their synonyms, time filter 2015 to September 2023. Studies published before 2015 were identified from a previous systematic review. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Descriptions of medication reviews' components, implementation and outcomes were narratively synthesised to draw out common themes. Results are presented in tables.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight papers describing 50 studies met the inclusion criteria. Common themes that emerged from synthesis include collaborative working which may help reduce medicines-related problems and the number of medicines prescribed; patient involvement in goal setting and action planning which may improve patients' ability to take medicines as prescribed and help them achieve their treatment goals; additional support and follow-up, which may lead to improved blood pressure, diabetes control, quality of life and a reduction of medicines-related problems.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review identified common themes and components, for example, goal setting, action planning, additional support and follow-up, that may influence outcomes of pharmacist-led medication reviews. Researchers, health professionals and commissioners could use these for a comprehensive evaluation of medication review implementation.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020173907.

Improving medication adherence in cardiovascular disease

Non-adherence to medication is a global health problem with far-reaching individual-level and population-level consequences but remains unappreciated and under-addressed in the clinical setting. With increasing comorbidity and polypharmacy as well as an ageing population, cardiovascular disease and medication non-adherence are likely to become increasingly prevalent. Multiple methods for detecting non-adherence exist but are imperfect, and, despite emerging technology, a gold standard remains elusive. Non-adherence to medication is dynamic and often has multiple causes, particularly in the context of cardiovascular disease, which tends to require lifelong medication to control symptoms and risk factors in order to prevent disease progression. In this Review, we identify the causes of medication non-adherence and summarize interventions that have been proven in randomized clinical trials to be effective in improving adherence. Practical solutions and areas for future research are also proposed.

Designing and psychometric evaluation of pharmacists' attitude toward ethical challenges questionnaire in pharmacy practice: A mixed‑method study

PURPOSE

Knowledge advancement exposes the pharmacists to new ethical and professional challenges in providing pharmaceutical care. The pharmacist's attitude towards the ethical challenges of pharmacy practice could be of great help in assessing pharmacist's ethical sensitivity. This study aimed to design a valid and reliable questionnaire for measuring pharmacists' attitudes.

METHODS

The present study is the second phase of a sequential exploratory mixed‑method study for designing and psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire. In the first phase the questionnaire was developed using semi-structured interviews followed by content analysis. The psychometric evaluation of the questionnaire was performed examining the validity (face, content, and construct), and reliability (internal consistency and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and Standard Error of Measurement) in a sample of pharmacists practicing in community pharmacies in Tehran and Tabriz, Iran (n = 504). The construct validity of the questionnaire was determined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

The Scale‑Content Validity Index/Average (S‑CVI/AVE) was calculated at 0.84. The results of exploratory factor analysis supported 22 items in four factors including regulations and rules, professional communications, providing and supplying medicine, and consultation and providing pharmaceutical care that are explained by a total of 49.50% of the variance. Also, confirmatory factor analysis confirmed goodness of fit indices and model fit. Cronbach's alpha Coefficient was 0.919 and ICC was 0.914.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric evaluation of the present questionnaire shows a native, valid and reliable instrument to assess pharmacists' attitudes toward ethical challenges which could be a mirror of pharmacists ethical sensitivity.

The interventions to improve medication adherence in coronary heart disease patient: A systematic review

Objective

The clinical outcome and quality of life of CHD patients are greatly influenced by medication adherence. Non-adherence of CHD patients to treatment results in sub-optimal clinical outcomes and increasing costs. This study aims to describe effectiveness of the intervention to improve the medication adherence in CHD patients.

Methods

Systematic review methodology was used in this study. Scopus and PubMed were used to search the relevant article systematically. The outcome measured was medication adherence in coronary heart disease patients.

Results

Final screening was 31 articles that met the inclusion criteria in this study of 788 articles. Selection processes the article used the PRISMA guideline. Most of the articles (15 articles) use interventions that utilize information technology (IT) as known with m-health in the form of text messages, website, and smartphone-based applications in increasing medication adherence in CHD patients. The non m-health interventions developed are in the form of self-efficacy programs, monitoring and education by health workers or care workers, pharmacy care by clinical pharmacists, and the use of drugs in the form of multi-capsules. The results of most intervention with m-health can improve the medication adherence in CHD patient effectively. Education and motivation program by professional health care and multi-capsules also increasing the medication adherence in the intervention control. There was a decrease of medication adherence in some articles with long time follow-up that can be attention for the professional health care to manage the patient adherent.

Conclusion

The medication adherence in CHD patient can be improve by various program. Modification of m-health and non m-health intervention can be resolved to increase the communication, motivation, and knowledge about medication adherence in CHD patients.

Patients' Beliefs About Their Cardiovascular Medications After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study

Background

Adherence to secondary preventive pharmacotherapy after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is generally poor and is associated with recurrent cardiovascular events. Patients' beliefs about their medications are a strong predictor of intentional nonadherence.

Methods

This prospective, observational study assessed adult patients' beliefs about their post-ACS medications, using the Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), and adherence, using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada during May-December, 2022. The BMQ and MARS-5 were administered in-hospital and at 4 weeks after discharge. Outcomes included difference in BMQ necessity-concerns differential (BMQ-NCD) from hospitalization to 4-week follow-up and factors associated with the BMQ-NCD.

Results

Forty-seven participants completed the 4-week follow-up. The mean age was 64 years, and 83% were male. Most presented with a non-ST-segment-elevation ACS. No difference occurred in BMQ-NCD (7.3 vs 6.6, P = 0.29) or MARS-5 scores from discharge to 4 weeks (22.8 vs 23.7, P = 0.06); however, the BMQ specific-necessity subscale score decreased significantly (20.3 vs 18.8, P = 0.002). South Asian and Middle Eastern ethnic origins, compared to European, were associated with a higher BMQ-NCD. Part-time employment and male sex were associated with a lower BMQ-NCD.

Conclusions

Participants held favourable beliefs about their post-ACS medications, which were largely unchanged from hospitalization to 4 weeks postdischarge, except for beliefs about the necessity of taking their medications. Those of European descent, those with part-time employment, and males had the lowest BMQ-NCD. Self-reported adherence was high. Ongoing reassessment of patients' beliefs about the necessity of taking their post-ACS medications may be warranted to mitigate further decline in BMQ-NCD.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Impact of continuous pharmaceutical care led by clinical pharmacists during transitions of care on medication adherence and clinical outcomes for patients with coronary heart disease: a prospective cohort study

Objectives: The study aimed to explore the impact of a continuous pharmaceutical care (CPC) program during care transitions on medication adherence and clinical outcomes for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted from April 2020 to February 2021. Patients diagnosed with CHD were selected and divided into intervention (CPC) and usual care (UC) groups by nurses at equal intervals based on admission time. The intervention group received CPC services provided by clinical pharmacists (including medication reconciliation, disease education, medication guidance, lifestyle counseling, and follow-up services) and usual care. The UC group received only routine medical care. The study compared medication adherence, clinical indicators (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], blood pressure [BP], glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] control rates), the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and readmission rates (overall, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACEs]-related, and CHD risk factors-related) at admission and 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge between the two groups. Results: A total of 228 patients with CHD completed the study, including 113 patients in the CPC group and 115 patients in the UC group. There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in both groups in demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline. A total of 101 drug-related problems were identified in the CPC group (an average of 0.89 per person). The CPC group showed significantly higher medication adherence at 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge than the UC group (p < 0.05). At 3 and 6 months after discharge, the intervention group had significantly higher control rates of LDL-C (61.11% vs. 44.64% at 3 months, 78.18% vs. 51.43% at 6 months), and BP (91.15% vs. 77.39% at 3 months, 88.50% vs. 77.19% at 6 months). The CPC group had higher HbA1c control rates (53.85% vs. 34.21% at 3 months, 54.05% vs. 38.46% at 6 months) than the UC group. However, the differences were not statistically significant. The incidence of ADRs 6 months after discharge was significantly lower in the CPC group than in the UC group (5.13% vs. 12.17%, p < 0.05). The CPC group had a lower overall readmission rate (13.27% vs. 20.00%), MACE-related readmission rate (5.31% vs. 12.17%), and readmission rate related to CHD risk factors (0.88% vs. 2.61%) 6 months after discharge compared to the UC group. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusion: CPC led by clinical pharmacists during care transitions effectively improved medication adherence, safety, and risk factor control in patients with CHD.

A systematic review investigating the role and impact of pharmacist interventions in cardiac rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a predominant cause of mortality. Pharmacists play an important role in secondary prevention of CVD, however, their role in cardiac rehabilitation is under-reported and services are under-utilised.

AIM

To explore the role of pharmacists in cardiac rehabilitation, the impact of their interventions on patient outcomes, and prospects of future role development.

METHOD

Databases searched were PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycINFO from January 2006 to October 2021. Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials were selected if they assessed the role of pharmacists in cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane risk of bias tool, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool for Quasi-Experimental Studies and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH) quality assessment tool, were used to assess quality and a narrative synthesis was conducted.

RESULTS

The search yielded 786 studies, only five met the inclusion criteria. The pharmacist-led interventions included patient education, medication review and reconciliation, and medication adherence encouragement. Four out of the five studies showed that pharmacist-led interventions in cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved patient clinical and non-clinical outcomes. One study showed a statistically significant reduction in low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to optimal target of < 70 mg/dL (80% vs 60%, p = 0.0084). Two studies reported better medication adherence, and two studies showed greater improvement in all domains of health-related quality of life observed in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacist-led interventions in cardiac rehabilitation could lower CVD risk factors and hence recurrence. Although these findings support pharmacists' involvement in cardiac rehabilitation, larger intervention studies are needed to evaluate the feasibility of pharmacist-led interventions and their impact on hospital admissions and mortality risk.

Comprehensive Medication Management Services with a Holistic Point of View, a Scoping Review

Implementing Comprehensive Medication Management (CMM) services uncovered the importance of the totality of the patient's perspective in this process. The holistic approach takes into account the physical, mental and emotional well-being of individuals, as well as their socioeconomic circumstances. The aim of this study was to characterize the scientific evidence associated with CMM services that included this holistic approach. A scoping review was conducted based on Arksey and O'Malley's method. Searches were performed in Google Scholar for papers published between 2010 and 2020 in English, Spanish and Portuguese. Study design, health contexts, sample of patients, results obtained, barriers and facilitators, and the integration of a holistic approach were determined. Two hundred and eighteen papers were evaluated, most of which focused on the implementation of this service through prospective observational studies. A minority of studies reported on a holistic approach, a smaller number examined the effect of social determinants of health, the patient's medication experiences and the pharmacotherapy outcomes from the patient's perspective. Despite the progress achieved, most of the referents do not yet reflect a broader view of the patient's life situation and its relationship to pharmacotherapy and the ways in which the pharmacist implements holistic elements to solve or prevent drug-related problems.

The Efficacy of Rosuvastatin, Amlodipine, and Aspirin in the Treatment of Hypertension with Coronary Heart Disease and Its Effect on Platelet Aggregation

Objective

This study was to study the efficacy of rosuvastatin, amlodipine, and aspirin in the treatment of hypertension with coronary heart disease and its effect on platelet aggregation.

Methods

The participants included 60 patients with hypertension and coronary heart disease who were treated at our hospital between January 2020 and May 2021 and were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin, amlodipine, and Ziyin Huoxue Recipe (observation group) or rosuvastatin, amlodipine, Ziyin Huoxue Recipe, and aspirin (experimental group), with 30 patients in each. Outcome measures included clinical effectiveness, blood pressure indicators, blood lipid indices, plasma viscosity, platelet aggregation, cardiac function, and adverse responses.

Results

The clinical efficacy in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the observation group (P < 0.05). The differences were found in blood pressure indices and blood lipid indices between the two groups before treatment (P > 0.05). However, after treatment, the blood pressure indices in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the observation group (P < 0.05). After treatment, the blood lipid indices, plasma viscosity, and platelet aggregation in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the observation group (P < 0.05). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of patients in the experimental group after treatment was significantly higher than that of patients in the observation group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions among patients in the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The clinical efficacy of rosuvastatin, amlodipine, and aspirin markedly reduces the blood pressure indices, blood lipid indices, plasma viscosity, and platelet aggregation of patients with hypertension and coronary heart disease, improves LVEF, and has a good safety profile.

The impact of a comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention in addition to cardiac rehabilitation program on outcomes of post-acute coronary syndrome patients: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To test the efficacy of Comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention added to cardiac rehabilitation program(CR programs) in improving echocardiographic parameters, nutritional status and High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein(hs-CRP), in post-acute coronary syndrome patients.

METHODS

A prospective; randomized, controlled study. 40 post-acute coronary syndrome patients, participating in CR program, were randomly allocated to either the control group(n = 20) or the intervention group(n = 20). Pharmaceutical care intervention included face-to-face education about the disease, healthy lifestyle, medication adherence, drug related problems management and goal setting. hs-CRP and cardiac parameters were measured at baseline and after 3 months.

RESULTS

After three months,the intervention group showed a significant decrease in left ventricular end systolic volume (p = 0.0026) and left ventricular end diastolic volume (p = 0.0009) compared to the control group. Also, intervention group showed a significant increase in nutritional status (p = 0.037) and the patients' knowledge about the disease and drugs (p = 0.0001). However, there was no significant change in hscrp level between groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that Comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention added to CR programs significantly improved cardiac parameters and nutritional status. This is best explained by increasing adherence to cardiovascular medications and to healthier lifestyle and optimizing medication knowledge and doses.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Implementing Comprehensive pharmaceutical care intervention added to CR programs could improve the cardiac function and nutritional status of post-acute coronary syndrome patients.

The role of psychotherapy as a medical specialty in public health

I n t r o d u c t i o n . Non-psychotic mental disorders are most prevalent mental disorders with the high relapse rate and onset in the early adulthood the most active period of life, psychosocial factors play essential role in their ethiopathogenesis. Psychotherapy as method influencing one’s mind and through the mind affecting ones organism is considered to play an essential role in the treatment system of this patients group as well as in medico-psychological support of the patients with somatic illnesses.

Obj e c t i v e definition of the modern psychotherapy content as independent medical specialty based on the modern data base of its efficacy research systematization, evaluation of its further perspectives development for the provision of the healthcare for the targeted population of the patients with non-psychotic mental disorders as well as organization of the medico-psychological support for the patients with somatic illnesses, taking into account the possibilities offered by digital technologies

М e t h o d s . WHO, PubMed, Scopus, Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science, Russian Science citation index Science Citation Index search was conducted on non-psychotic mental disorders epidemiology, COVID-19 pandemic impact on mental health, psychotherapy efficacy and psychotherapeutic treatment settings, possibilities of digital technologies implementation in modern psychotherapy.

R e s u l t s . The prevalence of non-psychotic mental disorders is constantly growing in the las years, they make a serious impact in the non-communicable diseases burden, with the increase of the treatment costs. The COVID-19 pandemic is characterized by decrease of mental health well-being, growth of the anxiety and depressive disturbances, also because of the somatogenic disorders included in the post-covid syndrome.

The recent studies persuasively demonstrated the efficacy of psychotherapy in the non-psychotic mental disorders treatment, combination of psycho- and pharmacotherapy is defined as the golden standard treatment, the ratio of them should be determined personalized in each individual case. Digital technologies active development, computerized psychotherapeutic programs implementation open new possibilities for the research of the psychotherapeutic treatment mechanisms as well as make psychotherapy more available for the different population groups and can substantially decrease treatment costs in the future.

Mental health care provision optimization should be aimed at the greater psychotherapists involvement as the main specialists for diagnostic and complex treatment of non-psychotic mental disorders treatment, development of psychotherapeutic offices network, they could be a center of this patient group healthcare system, as well as for patients recovering from novel coronavirus infection with psychoneurological complains, and can be used for the medico-psychological support of the patients with somatic illnesses.

Conclusion. Psychotherapy today is recognized as an effective non-psychotic mental disorders treatment method, in the future it can be used as an epigenetic modulator in the personalized medicine framework, it can be considered as an essential part of the medical-psychological support of the patients with somatic illnesses.