The association between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio with mortality among patients suffering from acute decompensated heart failure

Association between blood inflammatory indices and heart failure: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2009-2018

BACKGROUND

Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of heart failure (HF). This study was aimed to the potential association between complete blood cell count (CBC)-derived inflammatory biomarkers and HF.

METHODS

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2009-2018 were utilised. We evaluated the associations between HF and five systemic inflammation markers derived from CBC: systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR). Demographic characteristics, physical examinations, and laboratory data were systematically collected for comparative analysis between HF and non-HF individuals. Fitted smoothing curves and threshold effect analysis delineated the relationship. In addition, Spearman correlation and subgroup analyses were further conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 26,021 participants were categorised into HF (n = 858) and non-HF (n = 25,163) groups. After adjusting for confounding variables, SIRI, NLR, and MLR had significant positive correlations with the risk of HF. Participants in the highest quarter groups of SIRI, NLR, and MLR showed a increased risk of developing HF compared to those in the lowest quarter group. Furthermore, subgroup and sensitivity analyses indicated that SIRI, NLR, and MLR had a stronger correlation to HF (all p < 0.05). Smoothing curve fitting highlighted a nonlinear relationship between CBC-derived inflammatory biomarkers and HF.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results illustrated a significant association between elevated levels of SIRI, NLR, and MLR and an increased risk of HF. SIRI, NLR, and MLR could potentially serve as systemic inflammation hazard markers for HF.

Impact of heart failure and preoperative platelet count on the postoperative short-term outcome in infective endocarditis patients

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) and platelet count are often considered risk factors for mortality in patients with infective endocarditis (IE); however, their effects on various complications have not been elucidated.

HYPOTHESIS

We speculated that HF and platelet count have significant impact on the short-term outcomes of IE.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study analyzed data from 320 IE patients who underwent surgery. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the risk factors for adverse outcomes. The effect of the platelet count on the prognosis of patients with HF was determined by subgroup analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

The study population was divided into the HF group (n = 102) and the non-HF group (n = 218). The median age of the total population was 44.5 years (31-56 years), of which 227 (70.94%) patients were male. The incidence rates of 1-year all-cause mortality, cardiac outcomes, and composite outcomes were respectively almost sixfold, fourfold, and threefold higher in the HF group than in the non-HF group (all p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, HF was an independent risk factor for 1-year all-cause mortality, cardiac outcomes, cerebral outcomes, and composite outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that the patients with both HF and thrombocytopenia demonstrated the worst composite outcomes than the patients of the other groups (log-rank p < 0.001). In the HF group, the platelet count was significantly associated with mortality and composite outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

HF and preoperative platelet count are significantly associated with 1-year all-cause mortality and adverse outcomes postoperatively in IE patients. Patients with HF and thrombocytopenia have the worst short-term prognosis.

The impact of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on clinical outcomes in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Inflammation has been suggested to play a role in heart failure (HF) pathogenesis. However, the role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as a novel biomarker, to assess HF prognosis needs to be investigated. We sought to evaluate the impact of PLR on HF clinical outcomes.

METHODS

English-published records in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web-of-science databases were screened until December 2023. Relevant articles evaluated PLR with clinical outcomes (including mortality, rehospitalization, HF worsening, and HF detection) were recruited, with PLR difference analysis based on death/survival status in total and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients.

RESULTS

In total, 21 articles (n = 13,924) were selected. The total mean age was 70.36 ± 12.88 years (males: 61.72%). Mean PLR was 165.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 154.69-176.38]. In total, 18 articles (n = 10,084) reported mortality [either follow-up (PLR: 162.55, 95% CI: 149.35-175.75) or in-hospital (PLR: 192.83, 95% CI: 150.06-235.61) death rate] and the mean PLR was 166.68 (95% CI: 154.87-178.50). Further analysis revealed PLR was significantly lower in survived HF patients rather than deceased group (152.34, 95% CI: 134.01-170.68 versus 194.73, 95% CI: 175.60-213.85, standard mean difference: -0.592, 95% CI: -0.857 to -0.326, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for HFrEF patients. PLR failed to show any association with mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99-1.05, p = 0.289). Analysis of other aforementioned outcomes was not possible due to the presence of few studies of interest.

CONCLUSION

PLR should be used with caution for prognosis assessment in HF sufferers and other studies are necessary to explore the exact association.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) prognostic effects on heart failure; a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), as a recent inflammatory index, has been reported to be a prognostic tool in different diseases. However, implication of this ratio in heart failure (HF) is less investigated. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the potential impact of NLR on HF clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Relevant English published records in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were screened up to July 2023. Articles reporting clinical outcomes (follow-up or in-hospital mortality, readmission, HF prediction, extended hospital stay length, pulmonary vascular resistance, atrial fibrillation, renal disease and functional capacity) in HF sufferers were collected for further analysis with addition of NLR difference stratified by death/survived and HF status.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles (n = 18231) were finally selected which reported NLR in HF sufferers (mean: 4.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.02-4.73). We found 25 articles reported NLR and total mortality (either follow-up death (N = 19): 4.52 (95% CI: 4.03-5.01) or in-hospital death (N = 10): 5.33 (95% CI: 4.08-6.57)) with mean NLR of 4.74 (95% CI: 4.28-5.20). NLR was higher among deceased patients compared to survived ones (standard mean difference: 0.67 (95% CI: 0.48-0.87), P < 0.001)). NLR was found to be related with higher mortality risk (continuous variable: hazard ratio (HR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.23, P = 0.013), categorical variable: HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.27-2.46, P = 0.001, T2 vs. T1: HR:1.56, 95%CI: 1.21-2.00, P = 0.001, T3 vs. T1: HR:2.49, 95%CI: 1.85-3.35, P < 0.001). Other aforementioned variables were not feasible to analyze due to presence of few studies.

CONCLUSIONS

NLR is a simple and acceptable prognostic tool for risk stratification and prioritizing high risk patients in clinical settings, especially in resource limited nations.

Prognostic impact of monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio in coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory biomarkers are novel tools to assess the prognosis of different cardiovascular diseases. We evaluated the impact of the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) on clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

We systematically screened English-language articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to 31 August 2022. Relevant articles reporting the MLR and its association with clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, mortality, cardiac rupture, subclinical CAD, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) prediction, thin-cap fibroatheroma, no-reflow phenomenon, MLR-related differences in percutaneous coronary intervention, heart failure hospitalization, and depression) in patients with CHD were collected for further analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were selected. The mean MLR was 0.34. A higher MLR was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE among patients with CHD. The MLR was an independent predictor of MACE in patients with ACS. No significant association was found for CAD severity. A complementary analysis was not performed because of few studies focusing on the other predefined endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

The MLR is a simple and widely available tool to predict MACE in patients with CHD. This biomarker can be utilized in emergency settings to prioritize high-risk patients and optimize therapeutic interventions.

Association between fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio and prognosis of patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation is closely associated with the development and progression of heart failure (HF), increasing vulnerability to thromboembolic events. This retrospective cohort study assessed the potential of the fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), a new inflammatory biomarker, as a prognostic indicator for HF risk.

METHODS

One thousand one hundred and sixty six women and 826 men with a mean age of 70.70 ± 13.98 years were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV v2.0) database. Additionally, a second cohort was obtained, including 309 patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The relationship between FAR and the prognosis of HF was evaluated using multivariate analysis, propensity score-matched analysis, and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio was an independent risk factor for 90-day all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.19; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.40), 1-year all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.23; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.41), and length of hospital stay (LOS) (β: 1.52; 95% CI: 0.67-2.37) in the MIMIC-IV dataset, even after adjusting for potential covariates. These findings were verified in the second cohort (β: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.33-3.31) and persisted after propensity score-matching and subgroup analysis. FAR was positively correlated with C-reactive protein, NT-proBNP, and Padua score. The correlation between FAR and NT-proBNP (R = .3026) was higher than with fibrinogen (R = .2576), albumin (R = -.1822), platelet-to-albumin ratio (R = .1170), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (R = .1878) (ps  < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio is an independent risk prognostic factor for 90-day, 1-year all-cause mortality and LOS among HF patients. Inflammation and prothrombotic state may underlie the relationship between FAR and poor prognosis in HF.

Association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and long-term mortality in community-dwelling adults with heart failure: evidence from US NHANES 2005-2016

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) continues to be the major cause of hospitalizations. Despite numerous significant therapeutic progress, the mortality rate of HF is still high. This longitudianl cohort study aimed to investigate the associations between hematologic inflammatory indices neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio (NPAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling adults with HF.

METHODS

Adults aged 20 and older with HF in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database 2005-2016 were included and were followed through the end of 2019. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between the three biomarkers and all-cause mortality. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate their predictive performance on mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1,207 subjects with HF were included, representing a population of 4,606,246 adults in the US. The median follow-up duration was 66.0 months. After adjustment, the highest quartile of NPAR (aHR = 1.81, 95%CI: 1.35, 2.43) and NLR (aHR = 1.59, 95%CI: 1.18, 2.15) were significantly associated with increased mortality risk compared to the lowest quartile during a median follow-up duration of 66.0 months. Elevated PLR was not associated with mortality risk. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of NPAR, NLR, and PLR in predicting deaths were 0.61 (95%CI: 0.58, 0.65), 0.64 (95%CI: 0.6, 0.67), and 0.58 (95%CI:0.55, 0.61), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, elevated NPAR and NLR but not PLR are independently associated with increased all-cause mortality among community-dwelling individuals with HF. However, the predictive performance of NPAR and NLR alone on mortality was low.

Relative Values of Hematological Indices for Prognosis of Heart Failure: A Mini-Review

Owing to the augmented perception of heart failure (HF) pathophysiology, management of the affected patients has been improved dramatically; as with the identification of the inflammatory background of HF, new avenues of HF prognosis research have been opened up. In this regard, relative values of hematologic indices were demonstrated by a growing body of evidence to successfully predict HF outcomes. Cost-effectiveness, accessibility, and easy obtainability of these relative values make them a precious option for the determination of HF prognosis; particularly in low-income developing countries. In this short review, we aimed to present the current literature on the predictability of these hematologic parameters for HF outcomes.

Relationships between Easily Available Biomarkers and Non-Dipper Blood Pressure Pattern in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Introduction. Chronic inflammation plays an essential role in the pathophysiology of both arterial hypertension (HTN) and coronary artery disease (CAD), and is more pronounced in individuals with a non-dipper circadian blood pressure (BP) pattern. A non-dipping BP pattern is in turn is associated with increased cardiovascular morbi-mortality, and a higher risk of atherosclerotic events. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are readily available predictors of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular risk. The purpose of our study is to evaluate whether NLR, MLR and PLR can be used as cost-effective predictors of a non-dipping blood pressure pattern in hypertensive patients with stable CAD. Materials and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional retrospective analysis that included 80 patients with hypertension and stable CAD (mean age 55.51 ± 11.83 years, 71.3% male) referred to a cardiovascular rehabilitation center. All patients underwent clinical examination, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and standard blood analysis. Results: Baseline demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Patients with non-dipper pattern had significantly higher NLR (median = 2, IR (2–3), p < 0.001), MLR (median = 0.31, IR (0.23–0.39), p < 0.001) and PLR (median = 175, IR (144–215), p < 0.001) compared to dippers. Conclusion: Our results suggest that MLR and PLR are inexpensive and easily accessible biomarkers that predict a non-dipping pattern in hypertensive patients with stable CAD.

The platelet to lymphocyte ratio in heart failure: a comprehensive review

Introduction. At the crossroads of heart failure (HF) and systemic inflammation, platelets and lymphocytes are both influenced as well as actively participating in the bidirectional relationship. The platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) could therefore be a marker of severity. This review aimed to assess the role of PLR in HF. Methods. We searched the PubMed (MEDLINE) database using the keywords "platelet", "thrombocyte", "lymphocyte", "heart failure", "cardiomyopathy", "implantable cardioverter defibrillator", "cardiac resynchronization therapy" and "heart transplant". Results. We identified 320 records. 21 studies were included in this review, with a total of 17,060 patients. PLR was associated with age, HF severity, and comorbidity burden. Most studies reported the predictive power for all-cause mortality. Higher PLR was associated with in-hospital and short-term mortality in univariable analysis, however, it was not consistently an independent predictor for this outcome. PLR > 272.9 associated an adjusted HR of 3.22 (95%CI 1.56 - 5.68, p<0.001) for 30-day fatality. During long-term follow-up from 6 months to 5 years, PLR was an independent predictor of mortality in most studies, with cut-off values ranging from > 150 to > 194.97 and adjusted HR from 1.47 (95%CI 1.06 - 2.03, p=0.019) to 5.65 (95%CI 2.47-12.96, p<0.001). PLR > 173.09 had an adjusted OR 2.89 (95%CI 1.17-7.09, p=0.021) for predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. PLR was not associated with outcomes after cardiac transplant or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Conclusion: Increased PLR could be an auxiliary biomarker of severity and survival prognosis in HF patients.

Long-term prognostic value of inflammatory biomarkers for patients with acute heart failure: Construction of an inflammatory prognostic scoring system

Objective

Systemic inflammation is associated with a poor prognosis in acute heart failure (AHF). This study was to assess the long-term prognostic value of combining the accessible inflammatory markers in relation to all-cause mortality in patients with AHF.

Methods

Consecutive patients with AHF who were hospitalized between March 2012 and April 2016 at the Department of Cardiology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were enrolled in this prospective study. The LASSO regression model was used to select the most valuable inflammatory biomarkers to develop an inflammatory prognostic scoring (IPS) system. Kaplan-Meier method, multivariate COX regression and time-dependent ROC analysis were used to assess the relationship between inflammatory markers and AHF prognosis. A randomized survival forest model was used to estimate the relative importance of each inflammatory marker in the prognostic risks of AHF.

Results

A total of 538 patients with AHF were included in the analysis (mean age, 61.1 ± 16.0 years; 357 [66.4%] men). During a median follow-up of 34 months, there were 227 all-cause deaths (42.2%). C-reactive protein (CRP), red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were incorporated into the IPS system (IPS = 0.301×CRP + 0.263×RDW + 0.091×NLR). A higher IPS meant a significantly worse long-term prognosis in Kaplan-Meier analysis, with 0.301 points as the optimal cut-off value (P log-rank <0.001). IPS remained an independent prognostic factor associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality among patients with AHF in multivariate Cox regression models with a full adjustment of the other significant covariables. Random forest variable importance and minimal depth analysis further validated that the IPS system was the most predictive for all-cause mortality in patients with AHF.

Conclusions

Inflammatory biomarkers were associated with the risk of all-cause mortality in patients with AHF, while IPS significantly improved the predictive power of the model and could be used as a practical tool for individualized risk stratification of patients with AHF.

Value of the Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting CPET Performance in Patients with Stable CAD and Recent Elective PCI

Background and Objectives: Functional capacity (FC) assessed via cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a novel, independent prognostic marker for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are two readily available predictors of systemic inflammation and cardiovascular event risk, which could be used as cost-effective predictors of poor FC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of NLR and PLR in predicting poor FC in patients with CAD and recent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Materials and Methods: Our cross-sectional retrospective analysis included 80 patients with stable CAD and recent elective PCI (mean age 55.51 ± 11.83 years, 71.3% male) who were referred to a cardiovascular rehabilitation center from January 2020 to June 2021. All patients underwent clinical examination, cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer, transthoracic echocardiography and standard blood analysis. Results: Patients were classified according to percent predicted oxygen uptake (% VO2 max) in two groups—poor FC (≤70%, n = 35) and preserved FC (>70%, n = 45). There was no significant difference between groups regarding age, gender ratio, presence of associated comorbidities, left ventricular ejection fraction and NLR. PLR was higher in patients with poor FC (169.8 ± 59.3 vs. 137.4 ± 35.9, p = 0.003). A PLR cut-off point of 139 had 74% sensitivity and 60% specificity in predicting poor FC. After multivariate analysis, PLR remained a significant predictor of poor functional status. Conclusions: Although CPET is the gold standard test for assessing FC prior to cardiovascular rehabilitation, its availability remains limited. PLR, a cheap and simple test, could predict poor FC in patients with stable CAD and recent elective PCI and help prioritize referral for cardiovascular rehabilitation in high-risk patients.

Evaluating systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Pro-inflammatory pathways play an important role in the follow-ups of patients with intracardiac defibrillators (ICDs) for heart failure (HF) reduced with ejection fraction (HFrEF). A newly defined index - the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII)-has recently been reported to have prognostic value in patients with cardiovascular disease. This study's aim is to evaluate the SII value regarding its association with long-term mortality and appropriate ICD therapy during a 10-year follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 1011 patients with ICD for HFrEF. The SII was calculated as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio × total platelet count in the peripheral blood. The study population was divided into two groups according to the SII's optimal cut-off value to predict long-term mortality. The long-term prognostic impact of SII on these patients was evaluated regarding mortality and appropriate ICD therapy.

RESULTS

The patients with a higher SII (≥1119) had significantly higher long-term mortality and appropriate ICD therapy rates. After adjustment for all confounding factors, the long-term mortality rate was 5.1 for a higher SII. (95% CI: 2.9-8.1). The long-term appropriate ICD therapy rate was 2.0 for a higher SII (95% CI: 1.4-3.0).

CONCLUSION

SII may be an independent predictive marker for both long-term mortality and appropriate ICD therapy in patients with HFrEF.

Research on the correlation of immunity in patients with chronic insomnia

PURPOSE

To investigate the changes in immunity and clinical infection events among patients with chronic insomnia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients with chronic insomnia (age = 64.44 ± 10.53) and 47 normal controls (age = 67.08 ± 7.822) were selected to determine differences in data, such as complete blood counts (CBCs), biochemical indices, lymphocyte subsets, immunoglobulin (Ig), complement C3 and C4 and interleukin-6 (IL-6), as well as to compare the incidence of clinical infection between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in erythrocyte, hemoglobin, hematocrit, albumin, globulin, creatinine, IgG, IgG/IgM ratio, CD4⁺ T-lymphocytes, CD19-lymphocytes, CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, CD19/CD3 ratio, and clinical infection events between the chronic insomnia group and the control group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, and platelet counts; lymphocyte subsets CD8⁺ T and CD56⁺; platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR); neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR); complement C3; complement C4; IgM; IgA; and IL-6 between the experimental group and their controls (p > 0.05). The systolic and diastolic blood pressures of the chronic insomnia group did not vary widely from those of the controls (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with chronic insomnia have immunological abnormalities, characterized by a higher incidence of clinical infection.

Metolazone Add-On Therapy in Heart Failure: A Cohort Study from Persian Registry of Cardiovascular Disease/Heart Failure (PROVE/HF)

Background

One of the strategies for overcoming diuretic resistance among heart failure (HF) patients is adding thiazide-type diuretics. The main aim of this article is to compare the adverse clinical outcomes, including death and re-hospitalization, among individuals suffering from severe acute decompensated HF (ADHF) that consumed furosemide or furosemide plus metolazone.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was done in the context of the Persian registry of cardiovascular disease (PROVE) from September 2017 to September 2018. One thousand and four hundred thirty-eight individuals (furosemide: 972 and furosemide plus metolazone: 466) with the final diagnosis of severe ADHF (left ventricular ejection fraction < 30%) were selected and followed for 10.3 ± 7.8 months. The association between two groups, as mentioned above, with the incidence of death and re-admission, was evaluated with different models.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 68.19 ± 12.98 years. There was no significant relation in terms of death or re-hospitalization between patients with different diuretic regimens. After adjustment of potential confounders, we found that adding metolazone as an adjuvant HF therapy was not independently associated with death or re-hospitalization (hazard ratio (HR): 0.78,95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.59–1.03, P = 0.085, and odds ratio (OR): 0.80, 95% CI: 0.60–1.07, P = 0.135, respectively).

Conclusion

Our findings revealed that adding metolazone in patients with furosemide resistance is not associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Therefore, usage of these two therapeutic agents could be a helpful strategy for severe HF patients.