1
|
Ashraf DA, Ahmed U, Khan ZZ, Mushtaq F, Bano S, Khan AR, Azam S, Haroon A, Malik SA, Aslam R, Kumar J, Khan FZ, Faheem A, Kumar S, Hassan S. Long-term clinical outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Future Cardiol 2024; 20:137-150. [PMID: 38623957 DOI: 10.2217/fca-2023-0124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: In this study, we aim to discuss the long-term clinical outcomes of intravascular ultrasound imaging-guided percutaneous intervention (IVUS-PCI) versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex coronary lesions over a mean period of 2 years. Methods: A systematic search and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the efficacy of using intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography guidance in coronary artery stenting compared to angiography. Results: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials with 6740 patients were included. For the primary outcome, a pooled analysis (3.2 vs 5.6%). For secondary outcomes, the risk was significantly low in image-guided percutaneous intervention compared with angiography. Conclusion: Intravascular imaging-guided PCI is significantly more effective than angiography-guided PCI in reducing the risk of target lesion revascularization, target vessel revascularization, cardiac death, major adverse cardiovascular events and stent thrombosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danish Ali Ashraf
- Department of Internal Medicine, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
| | - Usman Ahmed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rawalpindi Medically University, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan
| | - Zainab Zaib Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, CMH Lahore Medical & Dental College, Lahore, 54810, Pakistan
| | - Fiza Mushtaq
- Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore, 54700, Pakistan
| | - Shehar Bano
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gujranwala Medical College, Gujranwala, 52250, Pakistan
| | - Ali Raza Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, 66000, Pakistan
| | - Saad Azam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan Medical & Dental College, Lahore, 64260, Pakistan
| | - Abdullah Haroon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ziauddin Medical College, Karachi, 75600, Pakistan
| | - Salman Ahmed Malik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, 66000, Pakistan
| | - Raza Aslam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, 66000, Pakistan
| | - Jai Kumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Farva Zaib Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Al-Nafees Medical College, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
| | - Amna Faheem
- Department of Internal Medicine, Abbottabad Int. Medical College, Abbottabad, Pakistan
| | - Sarwan Kumar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wayne State School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
| | - Saad Hassan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lee ZS, Ryan N. Intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention. Lancet 2024; 403:783-785. [PMID: 38401550 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02686-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong Shiun Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Aberdeen Royal infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK
| | - Nicola Ryan
- Department of Cardiology, Aberdeen Royal infirmary, Aberdeen AB25 2ZN, UK; University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stone GW, Christiansen EH, Ali ZA, Andreasen LN, Maehara A, Ahmad Y, Landmesser U, Holm NR. Intravascular imaging-guided coronary drug-eluting stent implantation: an updated network meta-analysis. Lancet 2024; 403:824-837. [PMID: 38401549 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02454-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous meta-analyses have shown reduced risks of composite adverse events with intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography guidance alone. However, these studies have been insufficiently powered to show whether all-cause death or all myocardial infarction are reduced with intravascular imaging guidance, and most previous intravascular imaging studies were done with intravascular ultrasound rather than optical coherence tomography (OCT), a newer imaging modality. We aimed to assess the comparative performance of intravascular imaging-guided PCI and angiography-guided PCI with drug-eluting stents. METHODS For this systematic review and updated meta-analysis, we searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to Aug 30, 2023, for studies that randomly assigned patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents either to intravascular ultrasound or OCT, or both, or to angiography alone to guide the intervention. The searches were done and study-level data were extracted independently by two investigators. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure, defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel-myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or target lesion revascularisation, assessed in patients randomly assigned to intravascular imaging guidance (intravascular ultrasound or OCT) versus angiography guidance. We did a standard frequentist meta-analysis to generate direct data, and a network meta-analysis to generate indirect data and overall treatment effects. Outcomes were expressed as relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs at the longest reported follow-up duration. This study was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO, number CRD42023455662). FINDINGS 22 trials were identified in which 15 964 patients were randomised and followed for a weighted mean duration of 24·7 months (longest duration of follow-up in each study ranging from 6 to 60 months). Compared with angiography-guided PCI, intravascular imaging-guided PCI resulted in a decreased risk of target lesion failure (RR 0·71 [95% CI 0·63-0·80]; p<0·0001), driven by reductions in the risks of cardiac death (RR 0·55 [95% CI 0·41-0·75]; p=0·0001), TV-MI (RR 0·82 [95% CI 0·68-0·98]; p=0·030), and target lesion revascularisation (RR 0·72 [95% CI 0·60-0·86]; p=0·0002). Intravascular imaging guidance also reduced the risks of stent thrombosis (RR 0·52 [95% CI 0·34-0·81]; p=0·0036), all myocardial infarction (RR 0·83 [95% CI 0·71-0·99]; p=0·033), and all-cause death (RR 0·75 [95% CI 0·60-0·93]; p=0·0091). Outcomes were similar for OCT-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided PCI. INTERPRETATION Compared with angiography guidance, intravascular imaging guidance of coronary stent implantation with OCT or intravascular ultrasound enhances both the safety and effectiveness of PCI, reducing the risks of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularisation, and stent thrombosis. FUNDING Abbott.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregg W Stone
- The Zena and Michael A Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Akiko Maehara
- Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yousif Ahmad
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Ulf Landmesser
- Deutsches Herzzentrum Charité, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zeng Y, Xu J, Deng Y, Li X, Chen W, Tang Y. Drug-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in the perspective of bibliometric analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1288659. [PMID: 38440210 PMCID: PMC10910058 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1288659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Drug-eluting stents (DES) play a crucial role in treating coronary artery disease (CAD) by preventing restenosis. These stents are coated with drug carriers that release antiproliferative drugs within the vessel. Over the past two decades, DES have been employed in clinical practice using various materials, polymers, and drug types. Despite optimizations in their design and materials to enhance biocompatibility and antithrombotic properties, evaluating their long-term efficacy and safety necessitates improved clinical follow-up and monitoring. To delineate future research directions, this study employs a bibliometric analysis approach. We comprehensively surveyed two decades' worth of literature on DES for CAD using the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). Out of 5,778 articles, we meticulously screened them based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, we conducted an in-depth analysis encompassing annual publication trends, authorship affiliations, journal affiliations, keywords, and more. Employing tools such as Excel 2021, CiteSpace 6.2R3, VOSviewer 1.6.19, and Pajek 5.17, we harnessed bibliometric methods to derive insights from this corpus. Analysis of annual publication data indicates a recent stabilisation or even a downward trend in research output in this area. The United States emerged as the leading contributor, with Columbia University and CRF at the forefront in both publication output and citation impact. The most cited document pertained to standardized definitions for clinical endpoints in coronary stent trials. Our author analysis identifies Patrick W. Serruys as the most prolific contributor, underscoring a dynamic exchange of knowledge within the field.Moreover, the dual chart overlay illustrates a close interrelation between journals in the "Medicine," "Medical," and "Clinical" domains and those in "Health," "Nursing," and "Medicine." Frequently recurring keywords in this research landscape include DES coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, implantation, and restenosis. This study presents a comprehensive panorama encompassing countries, research institutions, journals, keyword distributions, and contributions within the realm of DES therapy for CAD. By highlighting keywords exhibiting recent surges in frequency, we elucidate current research hotspots and frontiers, thereby furnishing novel insights to guide future researchers in this evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zeng
- Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Jiawei Xu
- Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| | - Yuxuan Deng
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Xiaoxing Li
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Wen Chen
- Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, China
| | - Yu Tang
- Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sreenivasan J, Reddy RK, Jamil Y, Malik A, Chamie D, Howard JP, Nanna MG, Mintz GS, Maehara A, Ali ZA, Moses JW, Chen S, Chieffo A, Colombo A, Leon MB, Lansky AJ, Ahmad Y. Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e031111. [PMID: 38214263 PMCID: PMC10926835 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the initial evidence supporting the utility of intravascular imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), adoption remains low. Recent new trial data have become available. An updated study-level meta-analysis comparing intravascular imaging to angiography to guide PCI was performed. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, and all-cause death. Mixed-effects meta-regression was performed to investigate the impact of complex PCI on the primary outcomes. A total of 16 trials with 7814 patients were included. The weighted mean follow-up duration was 28.8 months. Intravascular imaging led to a lower risk of major adverse cardiac events (relative risk [RR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.82]; P<0.001), cardiac death (RR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.34-0.71]; P<0.001), stent thrombosis (RR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.40-0.99]; P=0.046), target-lesion revascularization (RR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49-0.91]; P=0.01), and target-vessel revascularization (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.45-0.80]; P<0.001). In complex lesion subsets, the point estimate for imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI for all-cause death was a RR of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.55-1.02; P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing PCI, intravascular imaging is associated with reductions in major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, stent thrombosis, target-lesion revascularization, and target-vessel revascularization. The magnitude of benefit is large and consistent across all included studies. There may also be benefits in all-cause death, particularly in complex lesion subsets. These results support the use of intravascular imaging as standard of care and updates of clinical guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rohin K. Reddy
- National Heart and Lung InstituteImperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Yasser Jamil
- Section of Cardiovascular MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Aaqib Malik
- Department of CardiologyWestchester Medical Center, New York Medical CollegeValhallaNYUSA
| | - Daniel Chamie
- Section of Cardiovascular MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - James P. Howard
- National Heart and Lung InstituteImperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Michael G. Nanna
- Section of Cardiovascular MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | | | - Akiko Maehara
- Cardiovascular Research FoundationNew YorkNYUSA
- Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Ziad A. Ali
- Cardiovascular Research FoundationNew YorkNYUSA
- St Francis HospitalRoslynNYUSA
| | - Jeffrey W. Moses
- Cardiovascular Research FoundationNew YorkNYUSA
- Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNYUSA
- St Francis HospitalRoslynNYUSA
| | - Shao‐Liang Chen
- Nanjing First HospitalNanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Alaide Chieffo
- Vita Salute San Raffaele UniversityMilanItaly
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific InstituteMilanItaly
| | | | - Martin B. Leon
- Cardiovascular Research FoundationNew YorkNYUSA
- Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Alexandra J. Lansky
- Section of Cardiovascular MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Yousif Ahmad
- Section of Cardiovascular MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yasmin F, Jawed K, Moeed A, Ali SH. Efficacy of Intravascular Imaging-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Curr Probl Cardiol 2024; 49:102002. [PMID: 37544623 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Intravascular imaging (IVI) namely intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), presents as a promising imaging modality for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation compared to the gold-standard conventional two-dimensional angiography. IVI provides detailed information on vessel lumen, lesion length, and degree of calcification. For this purpose, we conducted a meta-analysis by pooling recently conducted randomized control trials (RCTs) to compare IVI with angiography for DES implantation. Scopus and MEDLINE were searched till May 2023 for RCTs comparing IVI with traditional angiography-guided stent implantation in coronary artery disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome of interest was target-lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary outcomes included target vessel revascularization (TVR), all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A random-effects meta-analysis with metaregression was performed to derive risk ratios with corresponding 95% CIs from dichotomous data. Fourteen RCTs with a total of 8946 CAD patients (IVI 4751 vs angiography 4195; mean age 61.7 years) and a median follow-up of 15 months (12-24.3) were included. IVI was associated with significantly reduced TLR (RR 0.63 [0.49, 0.79]) vs conventional angiography. Similarly, TVR incidence (RR 0.66 [0.53, 0.83]), and MACE (RR 0.69 [0.58, 0.78]) were also significantly decreased with IVI vs conventional angiography for PCI. However, no significant difference was observed in all-cause mortality between the 2 imaging modalities (RR 0.85 [0.63, 1.15]). Metaregression analysis showed no significant impact of follow-up duration, baseline comorbidities such as hypertension, smoking status, previous MI, and stent length on TLR incidence. IVI was associated with improved clinical outcomes in terms of reduced TLR, TVR, and MACE incidence when compared with traditional angiography in CAD patients for stent implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Yasmin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT 06510, USA.
| | - Kinza Jawed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Aga Khan Medical University, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Moeed
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200 Pakistan
| | - Syed Hasan Ali
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi 74200 Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Serrao G, Vinayak M, Nicolas J, Subramaniam V, Lai AC, Laskey D, Kini A, Seethamraju H, Scheinin S. The Evaluation and Management of Coronary Artery Disease in the Lung Transplant Patient. J Clin Med 2023; 12:7644. [PMID: 38137713 PMCID: PMC10743826 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Lung transplantation can greatly improve quality of life and extend survival in those with end-stage lung disease. In order to derive the maximal benefit from such a procedure, patients must be carefully selected and be otherwise healthy enough to survive a high-risk surgery and sometimes prolonged immunosuppressive therapy following surgery. Patients therefore must be critically assessed prior to being listed for transplantation with close attention paid towards assessment of cardiovascular health and operative risk. One of the biggest dictators of this is coronary artery disease. In this review article, we discuss the assessment and management of coronary artery disease in the potential lung transplant candidate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Serrao
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (M.V.); (J.N.); (V.S.); (A.C.L.); (D.L.); (A.K.); (H.S.); (S.S.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khan SU, Agarwal S, Arshad HB, Akbar UA, Mamas MA, Arora S, Baber U, Goel SS, Kleiman NS, Shah AR. Intravascular imaging guided versus coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2023; 383:e077848. [PMID: 37973170 PMCID: PMC10652093 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the absolute treatment effects of intravascular imaging guided versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary artery disease, considering their baseline risk. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to 31 August 2023. STUDY SELECTION Randomized controlled trials comparing intravascular imaging (intravascular ultrasonography or optical coherence tomography) guided versus coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention in adults with coronary artery disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Random effect meta-analysis and GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation) were used to assess certainty of evidence. Data included rate ratios and absolute risks per 1000 people for cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization, and target lesion revascularization. Absolute risk differences were estimated using SYNTAX risk categories for baseline risks at five years, assuming constant rate ratios across different cardiovascular risk thresholds. RESULTS In 20 randomized controlled trials (n=11 698), intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with a reduced risk of cardiac death (rate ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.72), myocardial infarction (0.81, 0.68 to 0.97), stent thrombosis (0.44, 0.27 to 0.72), target vessel revascularization (0.74, 0.61 to 0.89), and target lesion revascularization (0.71, 0.59 to 0.86) but not all cause death (0.81, 0.64 to 1.02). Using SYNTAX risk categories, high certainty evidence showed that from low risk to high risk, intravascular imaging was likely associated with 23 to 64 fewer cardiac deaths, 15 to 19 fewer myocardial infarctions, 9 to 13 fewer stent thrombosis events, 28 to 38 fewer target vessel revascularization events, and 35 to 48 fewer target lesion revascularization events per 1000 people. CONCLUSIONS Compared with coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention, intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with significantly reduced cardiac death and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. The estimated absolute effects of intravascular imaging guided percutaneous coronary intervention showed a proportional relation with baseline risk, driven by the severity and complexity of coronary artery disease. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42023433568.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safi U Khan
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Siddharth Agarwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Hassaan B Arshad
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Usman Ali Akbar
- Department of Medicine, West Virginia University - Camden Clark Medical Center, Parkersburg, WV, USA
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Stroke-On-Trent, UK
- Department of Medicine, Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shilpkumar Arora
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Usman Baber
- Department of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Sachin S Goel
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neal S Kleiman
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alpesh R Shah
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|