Potential for substitution of mental health care towards family practices: an observational study

Healthcare utilization patterns of individuals with depression after national policy to increase the mental health workforce in primary care: a data linkage study

BACKGROUND

The deployment of the mental health nurse, an additional healthcare provider for individuals in need of mental healthcare in Dutch general practices, was expected to substitute treatments from general practitioners and providers in basic and specialized mental healthcare (psychologists, psychotherapists, psychiatrists, etc.). The goal of this study was to investigate the extent to which the degree of mental health nurse deployment in general practices is associated with healthcare utilization patterns of individuals with depression.

METHODS

We combined national health insurers' claims data with electronic health records from general practices. Healthcare utilization patterns of individuals with depression between 2014 and 2019 (N = 31,873) were analysed. The changes in the proportion of individuals treated after depression onset were assessed in association with the degree of mental health nurse deployment in general practices.

RESULTS

The proportion of individuals with depression treated by the GP, in basic and specialized mental healthcare was lower in individuals in practices with high mental health nurse deployment. While the association between mental health nurse deployment and consultation in basic mental healthcare was smaller for individuals who depleted their deductibles, the association was still significant. Treatment volume of general practitioners was also lower in practices with higher levels of mental health nurse deployment.

CONCLUSION

Individuals receiving care at a general practice with a higher degree of mental health nurse deployment have lower odds of being treated by mental healthcare providers in other healthcare settings. More research is needed to evaluate to what extent substitution of care from specialized mental healthcare towards general practices might be associated with waiting times for specialized mental healthcare.

Mental Health Care Use by Ethnicity and Preferred Language in a National Cohort of Community Health Center Patients

OBJECTIVE

Disparities in U.S. mental health care by race and ethnicity have long been documented. The authors sought to compare specialty mental health service use among non-Hispanic White, English-preferring Hispanic, and Spanish-preferring Hispanic patients who accessed care in community health centers (CHCs).

METHODS

Retrospective electronic medical records data were extracted for patients ages ≥18 years who received care in 2012-2020 at a national CHC network. Zero-inflated Poisson regression models were used to estimate the likelihood of receiving mental health services, which was compared with expected annual rates of mental health service use.

RESULTS

Of the 1,498,655 patients who received care at a CHC during the study, 14.4% (N=215,098) received any specialty mental health services. English- and Spanish-preferring Hispanic patients were less likely to have had a mental health visit (OR=0.69, 95% CI=0.61-0.77, and OR=0.65, 95% CI=0.54-0.78, respectively). Compared with non-Hispanic White patients, Spanish-preferring Hispanic patients had an estimated annualized rate of 0.59 (95% CI=0.46-0.76) mental health visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who were likely to receive specialty mental health services, Spanish-preferring patients had a significantly lower rate of mental health care use. Although overall access to mental health care is improving, unequal access to recurring specialty mental health care remains among patients who do not prefer to use English.

"Not doing it justice": Perspectives of Recent Family Medicine Graduates on Mental Health and Addictions Training in Residency

OBJECTIVES

Family physicians report feeling inadequately prepared to meet the evolving mental health care needs of the population. Little scholarship exists evaluating the effectiveness of curricula designed to teach mental health and addiction (MH&A) care to family medicine (FM) residents. As such, the purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of recent FM residency graduates in providing mental health care, and their perceptions of mental health training gaps during their residencies.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study design was conducted by 8 recent graduates of the University of Toronto's FM residency program, who participated in semi-structured video interviews. A thematic analysis approach was used to collect and analyze the data.

RESULTS

Through thematic analysis, 3 overarching themes were developed: (1) barriers in providing mental health and addiction care, (2) curriculum renewal, and (3) the role of FPs and professional identity. Consistent with the literature, the majority of recent FM graduates expressed discomfort when managing patients with mental health and addiction concerns. Additionally, participants perceived residency program time constraints, rotational site differences, and limited exposure to marginalized populations all impacted learning and mastery of skills.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study underscore current gaps within the FM residency curriculum and highlight the need to address current curricular deficits.

French mental health care system: Analysis of care utilisation patterns and the case for a stepped care approach

CONTEXT

In France, spending on mental health and psychiatric care, in proportion to GDP, is close to the EU average. However, there are complaints that the French system is overwhelmed and potentially underfunded.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the utilisation of psychiatric and mental health care in different settings to consider the appropriateness of care provision and resource allocation.

METHODS

For the year 2018, several national databases on the use of all type of psychiatric care provision (full and part-time hospitalisations, private and public, public ambulatory care, private office-based psychiatrists) were cross-tabulated with diagnosis categories for different age groups and illness severity in order to assess the use of resources and evaluate the appropriateness of resource allocation.

RESULTS

A sizable proportion of patients with mild and moderate mental disorders are treated in psychiatric care whilst there is insufficient continuity of care for patients with severe disorders, who are not adequately followed up after discharge from hospitals. This contributes to increase the rate of re-hospitalisations, the use of emergency departments, and longer stays in hospitals.

CONCLUSION

The several components of the French mental health care system are used inappropriately, not only in geographical terms but also in terms of service use. We argue that strengthening the access to affordable psychotherapy and the implementation of a stepped-care approach could contribute to solve this issue.

Care transitions from the specialty to the primary care setting: A scoping literature review of potential barriers and facilitators with implications for mental health care

BACKGROUND, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This scoping review aimed to understand potential barriers and facilitators in transitioning patients from specialty to primary care settings, to inform the implementation of an intervention to promote active consideration of psychiatrically stable patients for transition from the specialty mental health setting back to primary care.

METHODS

Guided by Levac and colleagues' six-stage methodological framework for conducting scoping studies, we systematically searched electronic article databases for peer-reviewed literature from January 2000 to May 2016. We included identified articles that discuss findings related to potential barriers and facilitators in transitioning patients from specialty to primary care settings. We performed descriptive and thematic analyses of results to generate emergent codes and their categorizations.

RESULTS

Our database search yielded 906 unique articles, 23 of which we included in our scoping review. All but one of the included studies were conducted in North America. Identified potential barriers and facilitators spanned eight emergent themes-(i) primary care accessibility, especially in terms of timely availability of appointments, (ii) clarity in respective roles of specialty care and primary care in managing a patient, (iii) timely exchange of information, (iv) transition process management, (v) perceived ability of primary care providers to manage specialty conditions, (vi) perceived ability of patients to self-manage, (vii) leadership support and (viii) support for implementing initiatives to promote transitions.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this scoping review enable an increased understanding of current practices and considerations regarding care transitions from specialty to primary care settings. The importance of role clarification, shared clinical information systems, confidence in care competency, and adequate organizational support to promote appropriate transitions were themes most widely reported across the reviewed studies. Few studies specifically examined the transition from specialty mental health to primary care. Future studies should account for mental health-specific symptomatic patterns and recovery trajectories, such as prevalent chronicity and frequency of relapse, in planning and conducting transitions from specialty mental health back to primary care.

Cardiovascular risk management in patients with severe mental illness or taking antipsychotics: A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators among dutch general practitioners

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) or receiving treatment with antipsychotics (APs) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) increasingly depends on general practitioners (GPs) because of the shift of mental healthcare from secondary to primary care and the surge of off-label AP prescriptions. Nevertheless, the uptake of patients with SMI/APs in CVRM programmes in Dutch primary care is low.

OBJECTIVES

To explore which barriers and facilitators GPs foresee when including and treating patients with SMI or using APs in an existing CVRM programme.

METHODS

In 2019, we conducted a qualitative study among 13 Dutch GPs. During individual in-depth, semi-structured interviews a computer-generated list of eligible patients who lacked annual cardiovascular risk (CVR) screening guided the interview. Data was analysed thematically.

RESULTS

The main barriers identified were: (i) underestimation of patient CVR and ambivalence to apply risk-lowering strategies such as smoking cessation, (ii) disproportionate burden on GPs in deprived areas, (iii) poor information exchange between GPs and psychiatrists, and (iv) scepticism about patient compliance, especially those with more complex conditions. The main facilitators included: (i) support of GPs through a computer-generated list of eligible patients and (ii) involvement of family or carers.

CONCLUSION

This study displays a range of barriers and facilitators anticipated by GPs. These indicate the preconditions required to remove barriers and facilitate GPs, namely adequate recommendations in practice guidelines, improved consultation opportunities with psychiatrists, practical advice to support patient adherence and incentives for practices in deprived areas.

Sick or Sad? A Qualitative Study on How Dutch GPs Deal With Sadness Complaints Among Young Adults

Feelings of sadness among young adults related to a certain phase of life or to societal factors run the risk of being interpreted as an individual medical problem. Therefore, healthcare professionals should more often widen their perspective and consider de-medicalization as being part of their professional responsibility too. This article presents results from a qualitative interview conducted with 13 GPs in different phases of their career to get more insight into the way they deal with complaints of sadness among young adults. All participants acted proactively but in different ways. Based on the interviews, a typology of three types of general practitioners has been created: the fast referrer, the expert, and the societal GP. There seems to be a paradox in the way GPs think about de-medicalization on a macro level and the way they act on a micro level. Elaborating on Parsons'(1951) classical concept of the sick role, this study introduces the term semi-legitimized sick role to clarify this paradox. The third type, "the societal GP", appears to be the most able to show a more multifactorial view on complaints of sadness. Therefore, this type connects the most to a course of de-medicalization.

Caring for patients with mental disorders in primary care: a qualitative study on French GPs' views, atittudes and needs

BACKGROUND

Patients suffering from mental health disorders have complex care needs, associating poorer physical health status and depreved social condition. Given their central role in primary health care, GPs should be highly involved in providing global and cooperative care to these patients in partnership with mental health specialists.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the GP's views, attitudes and needs in the care of patients with mental disorders.

METHODS

We led a qualitative study from June to July 2017, with semi-structured interviews led on GPs' activity in Marseille (France). We performed an inductive thematic content analysis, using Excel software.

RESULTS

We interviewed 22 GPs. The GPs felt comfortable providing total care for their patients with anxiety and depression (most of the time perceived as 'minor cases'), whereas they felt uncomfortable and poorly integrated in the care of patients with psychotic symptoms (often perceived as 'severe'). They wanted to improve communication with psychiatrists.

CONCLUSION

The GPs seemed to assess the complexity of the cases and therefore their ability to deal with them, based on the type of their patients' psychiatric symptoms. For the 'severe patients', they felt they didn't have a significant role to play as a family doctor, while it has been shown that these patients have poorer physical health and need more coordinated care than other patient groups. An improved communication between GPs and mental health providers could reduce the difficulties for GPs in the care of people with mental health disorders and make possible a whole patient-centred approach.