The viral prescription pad - a mixed methods study to determine the need for and utility of an educational tool for antimicrobial stewardship in primary health care

Community pharmacists as antimicrobial guardians and gatekeepers - A qualitative study of the perspectives of pharmacy sector stakeholders

Background

Community pharmacists, as primary care providers, are an underutilised resource in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Primary care plays an important role in tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as the principle of balancing access to antimicrobials while ensuring optimal use is agnostic to health setting. Understanding the sector's perceptions and practices towards AMS involvement is a continuing focus area of research. However, there is an opportunity to understand the sociological factors which influence the profession's contribution to stewardship practice, particularly across a broader spectrum of sector stakeholders at the individual, practice, system, and policy levels.

Objective

To explore stakeholders' perceptions of the Australian community pharmacy sector's AMS involvement.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fifteen key informants from the Australian community pharmacy sector. Participants' insights were invited across three broad areas: (1) understanding of AMR and AMS; and the (2) current and (3) future state of community pharmacy's AMS involvement. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using a combined method of inductive (informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework) and deductive thematic analysis.

Results

Perceptions on promoting community pharmacists' AMS involvement within their existing role in promoting the quality use of medicines were heard. Adopting an antimicrobial guardian or gatekeeper role was perceived as influenced by the timing of their interaction with a patient either prior to, or post-consultation with a general practitioner (GP). Suggestions that the profession's potential and actual role in AMS could be challenged or even delimited due to lack of access to completeness of clinical information, and perceived consequences from a clinical and professional engagement perspective were also heard.

Conclusion

Collaborative partnerships between GPs and community pharmacists, framing stewardship within a quality use of medicines agenda, and highlighting connections between pharmacists' professional services such as minor ailments are key elements enabling community pharmacist's antimicrobial gatekeeper and guardian role.

Effects of patient education to reduce antibiotic prescribing rates for upper respiratory infections in primary care

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic stewardship programs in primary care are necessary to reduce the estimated 30% of inappropriately written antibiotic prescriptions and reduce the spread of microbial resistance. Most programs focus on educating prescribers, but this intervention focused on educating patients.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and implement an antibiotic stewardship program in a primary care clinic to educate patients with upper respiratory infections (URIs) about antibiotic use and to assess the effectiveness of the program through antibiotic prescribing rates.

METHODS

Using materials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Be Antibiotics Aware program, posters on antibiotic use were placed in the exam rooms, graphic interchange formats (GIFs) and memes were displayed on exam room monitors, patient-provider discussions on antibiotic use were held, and written information for symptom management of URIs was provided. Retrospective chart reviews were conducted to assess antibiotic prescribing rates by four prescribers in a primary care clinic for September and October 2020 and compared to the same time period for 2019.

RESULTS

The rate of total antibiotic prescriptions decreased by 12.6% (P = 0.044) and the rate of repeat consultation antibiotic prescriptions decreased by 12.2% (P = 0.007), whereas the rate of antibiotics prescribed at the time of the visit remained unchanged (P = 0.937). All providers had decreased rates of antibiotic prescribing after the intervention.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study indicate that providing education about antibiotics to patients in need of treatment for URIs may reduce the rate of antibiotics prescribed in primary care; however, further research is warranted.

Interprovincial variation in antibiotic use in Canada, 2019: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Geographic trends in antibiotic prescribing show regional variation in antibiotic overuse and antimicrobial resistance, posing a threat to global health care systems. This study's objective was to examine interprovincial variation in outpatient antibiotic dispensing in Canada in 2019.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of antibiotic prescriptions dispensed in Canadian provinces in 2019, leveraging the IQVIA Geographic Prescription Monitor database. We report annual rates of overall antibiotic dispensing, broad-spectrum antibiotic dispensing and age-specific antibiotic dispensing as prescriptions per 1000 population in each province and nationally.

RESULTS

A total of 23 406 640 antibiotic prescriptions were dispensed nationally in 2019, at a rate of 627.3 prescriptions per 1000 population. Overall antibiotic dispensing rates in Newfoundland and Labrador (920.5 prescriptions per 1000 population) and Saskatchewan (713.7 prescriptions per 1000 population) significantly exceeded the national rate, whereas the rate in British Columbia (543.3 prescriptions per 1000 population) was significantly below the national rate. We observed additional variation when provincial rates of antibiotic dispensing were stratified by drug class and age group.

INTERPRETATION

We identified interprovincial variation in antibiotic use in Canadian provinces in 2019. These findings highlight the need for provincial targets for antibiotic use to reduce overuse and antimicrobial resistance.

Measuring the impacts of the Using Antibiotics Wisely campaign on Canadian community utilization of oral antibiotics for respiratory tract infections: a time-series analysis from 2015 to 2019

BACKGROUND

On 1 November 2018, Choosing Wisely Canada launched their Using Antibiotics Wisely primary care campaign, which aimed to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) through educational tools for patients and providers.

OBJECTIVES

We explored the impact of this campaign on antibiotic utilization in Canada.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based study in Canada between January 2015 and December 2019. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to study the impact of the Using Antibiotics Wisely campaign on the prescribing rate (prescriptions per 1000 population) of RTI-indicated antibiotics. We analysed prescription rates overall and stratified by age group, drug class and province, in each month over the study period.

RESULTS

There was a 1.5% reduction in the annual prescribing rate of RTI-indicated antibiotics over the study period, which was generally consistent across age groups and provinces. Following the 2018 Using Antibiotics Wisely clinician toolkit release, we observed no significant change in RTI-indicated antibiotic prescribing rates nationally (P = 0.13). This was consistent by age group (children, P = 0.91; adults, P = 0.58; and older adults, P = 0.67) and drug class (narrow-spectrum penicillins, P = 0.88; macrolides, P = 0.85; broad-spectrum penicillins, P = 0.60; cephalosporins, P = 0.45; tetracyclines, P = 0.55; and fluoroquinolones, P = 0.98). In our secondary analysis of prescription rates in provinces that self-identified as prioritizing Using Antibiotics Wisely, we observed no significant change following the launch of the campaign.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of the Using Antibiotics Wisely campaign in Canada has not caused a significant change in short-term antibiotic prescribing patterns. Community antibiotic stewardship campaigns that include components beyond education may be more impactful.

Community pharmacist prescribing of antimicrobials: A systematic review from an antimicrobial stewardship perspective

Background:

Pharmacist prescribing authority is expanding, while antimicrobial resistance is an increasing global concern. We sought to synthesize the evidence for antimicrobial prescribing by community pharmacists to identify opportunities to advance antimicrobial stewardship in this setting.

Methods:

We conducted a systematic review to characterize the existing literature on community pharmacist prescribing of systemic antimicrobials. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts for English-language articles published between 1999 and June 20, 2019, as well as hand-searched reference lists of included articles and incorporated expert suggestions.

Results:

Of 3793 articles identified, 14 met inclusion criteria. Pharmacists are most often prescribing for uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI), acute pharyngitis and cold sores using independent and supplementary prescribing models. This was associated with high rates of clinical improvement (4 studies), low rates of retreatment and adverse effects (3 studies) and decreased health care utilization (7 studies). Patients were highly satisfied (8 studies) and accessed care sooner or more easily (7 studies). Seven studies incorporated antimicrobial stewardship into study design, and there was overlap between study outcomes and those relevant to outpatient antimicrobial stewardship. Pharmacist intervention reduced unnecessary prescribing for acute pharyngitis (2 studies) and increased the appropriateness of prescribing for UTI (3 studies).

Conclusion:

There is growing evidence to support the role of community pharmacists in antimicrobial prescribing. Future research should explore additional opportunities for pharmacist antimicrobial prescribing and ways to further integrate advanced antimicrobial stewardship strategies in the community setting. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2021;154:xx-xx.

Evaluation of a multimodal intervention to promote rational antibiotic use in primary care

Background

Increasing antimicrobial resistance is a serious societal challenge affecting outpatient, inpatient and veterinary care. The German One-Health project, RAI (Rational use of Antibiotics via Information and Communication) addresses all three sectors. In the outpatient sector, General Practitioners (GPs) are the main prescribers of antibiotics and were therefore, targeted for this study. A multimodal intervention focusing on Acute Respiratory Tract infections (ARI) was designed and implemented. The aim of this study was to evaluate acceptance, rating and the self-reported impact of the intervention among GPs.

Methods

The intervention offered six tools: a GP training on rational antibiotic use, an app for self-monitoring, a leaflet and a set of posters (both for use as information materials in waiting rooms) and both digital and printed information prescriptions (material for ‘prescribing’ information instead of an antibiotic to the patient). The tools could be used according to individual preferences. The intervention was conducted between August 2016 and July 2017. Following the intervention, a three pages anonymous questionnaire was sent to all 271 participants. Items covered socio-demographic and professional background, use and judgement of the intervention tools (6 point Likert scale), impact of the intervention tools (4 point Likert scale).

Results

The response rate was 39% (n = 107). On average, respondents used 3.1 of the six available tools, with printed information prescriptions used most frequently (79%). Digital information prescriptions were used more frequently by men than by women (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.16–7.24; p = 0.02). Eighty-seven percent of respondents stated that information prescriptions supported doctor-patient communication. In a comparison of the overall impression of the different intervention tools the GP training on rational antibiotic use was rated best (1.67 on a 6 point scale with 1 = highest, 6 = lowest) and most often noted as having had a “strong” or “very strong” impact on personal antibiotic prescribing behavior.

Conclusions

The multimodal intervention addressing education and communication was well accepted among GPs and could help in fostering rational use of antibiotics in primary care.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13756-021-00908-9.

Development of a Patient-Oriented Intervention to Support Patient-Provider Conversations about Unnecessary Lower Back Pain Imaging

Background: despite the efforts of multiple stakeholders to promote appropriate care throughout the healthcare system, studies show that two out of three lower back pain (LBP) patients expect to receive imaging. We used the Choosing Wisely Canada patient-oriented framework, prioritizing patient engagement, to develop an intervention that addresses lower back pain imaging overuse. Methods: to develop this intervention, we collaborated with a multidisciplinary advisory team, including two patient partners with lower back pain, researchers, clinicians, healthcare administrators, and the Choosing Wisely Canada lead for Saskatchewan. For this qualitative study, data were collected through two advisory team meetings, two individual interviews with lower back pain patient partners, and three focus groups with lower back pain patient participants. A lower back pain prescription pad was developed as an outcome of these consultations. Results: participants reported a lack of interactive and informative communication was a significant barrier to receiving appropriate care. The most cited content information for inclusion in this intervention was treatments known to work, including physical activity, useful equipment, and reliable sources of educational material. Participants also suggested it was important that benefits and risks of imaging were explained on the pad. Three key themes derived from the data were also used to guide development of the intervention: (a) the role of imaging in LBP diagnosis; (b) the impact of the patient-physician relationship on LBP diagnosis and treatment; and (c) the lack of patient awareness of Choosing Wisely Canada and their recommendations. Conclusions: the lower back pain patient-developed prescription pad may help patients and clinicians engage in informed conversations and shared decision making that could support reduce unnecessary lower back pain imaging.

Changing behaviour, 'more or less': do implementation and de-implementation interventions include different behaviour change techniques?

BACKGROUND

Decreasing ineffective or harmful healthcare practices (de-implementation) may require different approaches than those used to promote uptake of effective practices (implementation). Few psychological theories differentiate between processes involved in decreasing, versus increasing, behaviour. However, it is unknown whether implementation and de-implementation interventions already use different approaches. We used the behaviour change technique (BCT) taxonomy (version 1) (which includes 93 BCTs organised into 12 groupings) to investigate whether implementation and de-implementation interventions for clinician behaviour change use different BCTs.

METHODS

Intervention descriptions in 181 articles from three systematic reviews in the Cochrane Library were coded for (a) implementation versus de-implementation and (b) intervention content (BCTs) using the BCT taxonomy (v1). BCT frequencies were calculated and compared using Pearson's chi-squared (χ2), Yates' continuity correction and Fisher's exact test, where appropriate. Identified BCTs were ranked according to frequency and rankings for de-implementation versus implementation interventions were compared and described.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine and 25 BCTs were identified in implementation and de-implementation interventions respectively. Feedback on behaviour was identified more frequently in implementation than de-implementation (Χ2(2, n=178) = 15.693, p = .000057). Three BCTs were identified more frequently in de-implementation than implementation: Behaviour substitution (Χ2(2, n=178) = 14.561, p = .0001; Yates' continuity correction); Monitoring of behaviour by others without feedback (Χ2(2, n=178) = 16.187, p = .000057; Yates' continuity correction); and Restructuring social environment (p = .000273; Fisher's 2-sided exact test).

CONCLUSIONS

There were some significant differences between BCTs reported in implementation and de-implementation interventions suggesting that researchers may have implicit theories about different BCTs required for de-implementation and implementation. These findings do not imply that the BCTs identified as targeting implementation or de-implementation are effective, rather simply that they were more frequently used. These findings require replication for a wider range of clinical behaviours. The continued accumulation of additional knowledge and evidence into whether implementation and de-implementation is different will serve to better inform researchers and, subsequently, improve methods for intervention design.