1
|
Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, Katzka D, Pandolfino J, Savarino E, Sifrim D, Spechler S, Zerbib F, Fox MR, Bhatia S, de Bortoli N, Cho YK, Cisternas D, Chen CL, Cock C, Hani A, Remes Troche JM, Xiao Y, Vaezi MF, Roman S. Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0. Gut 2024; 73:361-371. [PMID: 37734911 PMCID: PMC10846564 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
The Lyon Consensus provides conclusive criteria for and against the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and adjunctive metrics that consolidate or refute GERD diagnosis when primary criteria are borderline or inconclusive. An international core and working group was assembled to evaluate research since publication of the original Lyon Consensus, and to vote on statements collaboratively developed to update criteria. The Lyon Consensus 2.0 provides a modern definition of actionable GERD, where evidence from oesophageal testing supports revising, escalating or personalising GERD management for the symptomatic patient. Symptoms that have a high versus low likelihood of relationship to reflux episodes are described. Unproven versus proven GERD define diagnostic strategies and testing options. Patients with no prior GERD evidence (unproven GERD) are studied using prolonged wireless pH monitoring or catheter-based pH or pH-monitoring off antisecretory medication, while patients with conclusive GERD evidence (proven GERD) and persisting symptoms are evaluated using pH-impedance monitoring while on optimised antisecretory therapy. The major changes from the original Lyon Consensus criteria include establishment of Los Angeles grade B oesophagitis as conclusive GERD evidence, description of metrics and thresholds to be used with prolonged wireless pH monitoring, and inclusion of parameters useful in diagnosis of refractory GERD when testing is performed on antisecretory therapy in proven GERD. Criteria that have not performed well in the diagnosis of actionable GERD have been retired. Personalisation of investigation and management to each patient's unique presentation will optimise GERD diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Prakash Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California in San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ronnie Fass
- Medicine/Section of Gastroenterology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - David Katzka
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - John Pandolfino
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, University of Padua, Padova, Italy
| | - Daniel Sifrim
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Stuart Spechler
- Division of Gastroenterology, Baylor Scott and White North Texas, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Frank Zerbib
- Gastroenterology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mark R Fox
- Gastroenterology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Yu Kyung Cho
- Gastroenterology, Catholic University of Korea - Songsin Campus, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Daniel Cisternas
- Digestive System Research Unit, Universidad del Desarrollo Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Las Condes, Chile
| | - Chien-Lin Chen
- Department of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Charles Cock
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Albis Hani
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | | | - Yinglian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sun Yan-sen University of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Michael F Vaezi
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Sabine Roman
- Department of Digestive Physiology, Universite de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu Y, Guo Z, Zhang C, Zhan Y. Role of the Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance in Identifying Evidence Against Pathologic Reflux in Patients With Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms as Classified by the Lyon Consensus. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 28:121-130. [PMID: 34980695 PMCID: PMC8748854 DOI: 10.5056/jnm20277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) is a new reflux metric for mucosal integrity. It remains unclear whether MNBI can help identify evidence against pathological reflux by the Lyon Consensus in patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. Methods Three hundred and forty-nine patients with refractory GERD symptoms enrolled in this study were subjected to high-resolution manometry, 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH) monitoring, and endoscopy. Conventional indexes (ie, reflux events and acid exposure time) and the novel index (MNBI) of MII-pH monitoring were extracted and analyzed. The value of MNBI in diagnosing patients with evidence against pathologic reflux was evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. Results There were 102 (29.2%) patients with evidence against pathologic reflux, 149 (42.7%) with inconclusive or borderline evidence and 98 (28.1%) with conclusive evidence for pathologic reflux. The MNBI was significantly higher while the proportion of pathological MNBI was significantly lower in subjects with evidence against pathologic reflux than in patients with inconclusive or borderline evidence and in patients with conclusive evidence for pathologic reflux (2444.3 [1977.9-2997.4] vs 1992.8 [1615.5-2253.6] and vs 1772.3 [758.6-2161.3], both P < 0.001; 42.2% vs 79.7% and vs 80.0%, both P < 0.05). When identifying evidence against pathologic reflux in patients with refractory GERD symptoms, the MNBI yielded an area under the curve of 0.749 (P < 0.001) at a cutoff value of 1941.8 Ω. Conclusions The MNBI has a good diagnostic value for evidence against pathological reflux in patients with refractory GERD symptoms. For its simplicity and reproducibility, we believe that MNBI should be referred to in reports of impedance-pH tracings by physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhong Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tong Ren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zihao Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tong Ren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chuan Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tong Ren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yutao Zhan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tong Ren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim SY, Jung HK, Lee HA. Normal acid exposure time in esophageal pH monitoring in Asian and Western populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2021; 33:e14029. [PMID: 33377596 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophageal acid exposure time (AET) during 24 h pH monitoring is reproducible and predictive outcomes of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Several small Asian studies have investigated the normal range of the AET; the range may be different from that in Western populations. We evaluated its normal range in healthy Asian compared to Western subjects. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed for studies that reported pH monitoring parameters in healthy subjects. Studies that reported the AET values of healthy subjects were eligible for the analyses. The upper limit of normal of the AET was obtained from the 95th percentile of the available raw data or calculated as the mean value +2 standard deviations. KEY RESULTS Nineteen Asian and 49 Western studies were assessed. The estimated AET values were analyzed using a bootstrapping technique, weighted according to the sample size. The mean AET was 1.1% and 2.9% in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The upper limit of the reference range was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-3.9%) and 8.2 (95% CI, 6.7-9.9) in the Asian and Western populations, respectively. The normal AET differed between the Asian and Western populations because the CI of the two groups did not overlap. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES The upper limit of normal of the AET in healthy Asian subjects was 3.2% (95% CI, 2.7-3.9%), which was lower than that of healthy Western subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Kyung Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Woman's University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Ah Lee
- Clinical Trial Center, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Woman's University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|