The clinical applicability of percutaneous splenic vein stent implantation for pancreatic portal hypertension

Percutaneous transhepatic sclerotherapy for ascending colonic varices due to left-sided portal hypertension

Left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH) causes varices and splenomegaly due to splenic vein issues. Colonic varices are rare and lack standardized treatment. We report the successful treatment of colonic varices caused by LSPH, by addressing both the afferent and efferent veins. A 70-year-old man with distal cholangiocarcinoma had surgery without splenic vein resection, leading to proximal splenic vein stenosis and varices at multiple locations. Percutaneous transhepatic splenic venography revealed that collateral veins flowed into the ascending colonic varices and returned to the portal vein. Complete thrombosis of the varices was achieved by injecting sclerosants and placing coils in both the afferent and efferent veins. The procedure was safe and effective, with no variceal recurrence. This approach provides a minimally invasive option for treating colonic varices associated with LSPH.

Splenectomy versus non-splenectomy for gastrointestinal bleeding from left-sided portal hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH) leads to life-threatening gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. There are no recommendations or consensus about the management of GI bleeding caused by LSPH. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the incidence of GI bleeding and the mortality of patients with LSPH receiving different therapeutic strategies.

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the efficacy of different therapeutic strategies for GI bleeding caused by LSPH.

Data sources and methods

All relevant studies were searched from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang Data without language restriction through 15 November 2023. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated through RevMan5.3 software. (The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark).

Results

Seventeen retrospective studies and one prospective study involving 624 patients were included. This systematic review and meta-analysis found that: (1) splenectomy was more effective than non-splenectomy therapeutic strategies in reducing the incidence of GI bleeding caused by LSPH (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.06-0.27); (2) splenectomy was superior to partial splenic artery embolism (PSAE) (OR: 0.06; 95% CI: 0.01-0.62) or endoscopic interventions (OR: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01-0.19) in the prevention of GI bleeding, respectively; (3) no significant difference in the mortality was observed between splenectomy and non-splenectomy therapeutic strategies (OR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.20-1.08); and (4) patients receiving preoperative PSAE followed by splenectomy had less intraoperative bleeding and shorter operative time than those receiving splenectomy.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that splenectomy is superior to non-splenectomy therapeutic strategies in reducing the incidence of GI bleeding from LSPH, which revealed that splenectomy should be recommended in the management of these patients.

Trial registration

This study has been registered on the PROSPERO database with the registration number CRD42023483764.

Percutaneous Covered Stenting in Splenic Vein for Left-sided Portal Hypertension Caused by Chronic Splenic Vein Obstruction

Left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH), an uncommon manifestation of portal hypertension, is characterized by conditions such as isolated gastric varices and splenomegaly, which result from impeded splenic venous drainage in the presence of pancreatic disease. We employed a percutaneous transhepatic technique to achieve regression of isolated gastric varices by implanting a covered stent within a blocked splenic vein and by embolizing the posterior gastric vein and varices using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. We report the successful treatment of stenting for LSPH by the covered stent placement.

Combined transhepatic and transsplenic recanalization of chronic splenic vein occlusion to treat left-sided portal hypertension: A cases report

RATIONALE

This report describes a unique case of a combination transhepatic and transsplenic recanalization of chronic splenic vein occlusion to treat left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH).

PATIENT CONCERNS

In this case report, we report a 49-year-old male who was admitted due to LSPH causing black stools for 2 days and vomiting blood for 1 hour.

DIAGNOSES

The patient has a history of multiple episodes of pancreatitis in the past. After admission, abdominal contrast-enhanced CT scan showed the appearance of pancreatitis, with extensive splenic vein occlusion and accompanied by gastric varicose veins, indicating the formation of LSPH.

INTERVENTION

The patient received treatment with a combination of splenic and hepatic splenic venoplasty.

OUTCOMES

Follow up for 1 year, CT and gastroscopy showed disappearance of gastric varices.

LESSONS

Splenic venoplasty is an effective method for treating LSPH. When it is difficult to pass through the occluded segment of the splenic vein through a single approach, percutaneous double approach splenic venoplasty can be attempted for treatment.

Vascular complications of chronic pancreatitis and its management

Chronic pancreatitis is a chronic fibro-inflammatory disorder of the pancreas, resulting in recurrent abdominal pain, diabetes mellitus, and malnutrition. It may lead to various other complications such as pseudocyst formation, benign biliary stricture, gastric outlet obstruction; and vascular complications like venous thrombosis, variceal and pseudoaneurysmal bleed. Development of varices is usually due to chronic venous thrombosis with collateral formation and variceal bleeding can easily be tackled by endoscopic therapy. Pseudoaneurysmal bleed can be catastrophic and requires radiological interventions including digital subtraction angiography followed by endovascular obliteration, or sometimes with a percutaneous or an endoscopic ultrasound-guided approach in technically difficult situations. Procedure-related bleed is usually venous and mostly managed conservatively. Procedure-related arterial bleed, however, may require radiological interventions.

Treatment of colonic varices and gastrointestinal bleeding by recanalization and stenting of splenic-vein-thrombosis: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Splenic vein thrombosis is a known complication of pancreatitis. It can lead to increased blood flow through mesenteric collaterals. This segmental hypertension may result in the development of colonic varices (CV) with a high risk of severe gastrointestinal bleeding. While clear guidelines for treatment are lacking, splenectomy or splenic artery embolization are often used to treat bleeding. Splenic vein stenting has been shown to be a safe option.

CASE SUMMARY

A 45-year-old female patient was admitted due to recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. She was anemic with a hemoglobin of 8.0 g/dL. As a source of bleeding, CV were identified. Computed tomography scans revealed thrombotic occlusion of the splenic vein, presumably as a result of a severe acute pancreatitis 8 years prior. In a selective angiography, a dilated mesenterial collateral leading from the spleen to enlarged vessels in the right colonic flexure and draining into the superior mesenteric vein could be confirmed. The hepatic venous pressure gradient was within normal range. In an interdisciplinary board, transhepatic recanalization of the splenic vein via balloon dilatation and consecutive stenting, as well as coiling of the aberrant veins was discussed and successfully performed. Consecutive evaluation revealed complete regression of CV and splenomegaly as well as normalization of the red blood cell count during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Recanalization and stenting of splenic vein thrombosis might be considered in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding due to CV. However, a multidisciplinary approach with a thorough workup and discussion of individualized therapeutic strategies is crucial in these difficult to treat patients.

Attach importance to the individualized treatment of adult portal hypertension based on etiology and pathogenesis: A review

There are many factors that can cause portal hypertension and secondary symptoms such as ascites, splenomegaly, and variceal hemorrhage, can seriously affect patients' quality of life and even threaten their lives. In this paper, we summarize various causes of portal hypertension based on etiology and pathogenesis and give individualized treatment strategies in order to remind clinicians to pay attention to the identification of different causes and select corresponding treatment, so that patients are provided with the optimal treatment strategies and benefit from them.