The development and psychometric properties of oral health assessment instruments used by non-dental professionals for nursing home residents: a systematic review

Oral health assessment in institutionalized elderly: a scoping review

When elderly become frail and in need for complex care, they can no longer live independently at home and may be admitted to nursing homes. Various studies have shown that oral health in this population is remarkably poor, which may lead to distressing situations and impacts quality of life. A variety of definitions or descriptions for oral health is used. Without a uniform parameter, it is impossible to determine whether oral health in institutionalized elderly is actually improving or deteriorating over time, as well as the effect of (preventive) interventions. In search for an adequate and clinically applicable parameter to determine oral health in this specific patient group, this scoping review aims to give an overview of the currently used parameters for determining oral health in institutionalized elderly. Ninety different parameters were identified, and 50 parameters were solely used by one study. Only 4 parameters were frequently used (in > 20 studies). The relevance of these parameters for this specific patient group is discussed. To aid the planning and commissioning of future research and patient care, there is an urgent need for an adequate and uniform parameter for oral health determination in institutionalized elderly.

[Integrating risks for oral diseases into Structured Information Collection: A practice development project]

Integrating risks for oral diseases into Structured Information Collection: A practice development project Abstract. Background: Deficient oral hygiene and oral diseases are highly prevalent among nursing staff. Up to now, there is no assessment for nursing professionals integrated in the daily nursing routine, which depicts the complex risks for oral diseases. The Structured Information Collection (SIS) is a concept to guide the nursing process and enables individual action planning. Aim: The aim was to integrate oral diseases as a nursing-relevant risk into the SIS and to develop an assessment instrument for oral hygiene deficits/diseases integrated into the SIS topic areas. Methods: Based on a literature search, 21 systematic reviews describing SIS topic areas and oral health risks were analysed by a panel of experts. The caregiver-relevant oral health risks identified in this way were compared with existing oral health assessment instruments and with screening criteria recommended in the German national expert standard for the promotion of oral health in care. Since none of the oral health assessments covers all nursing-relevant oral health risks and the recommended screening criteria of the expert standard, the area of "oral diseases" was integrated into the SIS as an additional category, and an oral health assessment adapted to the SIS was developed. Results: This article presents the SIS expanded to include nursing-relevant oral disease risk and the newly developed Oral Risk Assessment Prevention (Mu-RAP) for use by nurses. Conclusions: The SIS expanded to include oral disease and the Mu-RAP for identifying oral hygiene deficits/diseases cover all nursing-relevant oral health risks. Further studies on the applicability, reliability, and validity of the instrument, as well as on care-effective and patient-relevant effects of its use are needed.

A systematic review of measurement instruments for oral health assessment of older adults in long-term care facilities by nondental professionals

BACKGROUND

Regular oral health assessment of older adults living in Long-term Care Facilities (LTCF) can improve their oral health.

AIMS

This study aimed to systematically review studies describing the development of instruments employed by nondental professionals to assess the oral health of older adults in LTCF and to evaluate their measurement properties.

MATERIAL & METHODS

Electronic searches were conducted in the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and LILACS databases. Measurement properties of the identified instruments were evaluated using the Consensus-based Standards to select health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Studies assessing at least one measurement property (validity, reliability, or responsiveness) of instruments used to assess oral health of older adults living in LTCF by nondental professionals were considered. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) checklist was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies reporting measurement properties of seven instruments were selected. The ohr-interRAI and the OHAT were considered to have sufficient content validity, with high and moderate evidence quality, respectively. OHAT, BOHSE, and DHI showed acceptable results on reliability but with very low quality of evidence. DHI and OHSTNP also showed acceptable results for criterion validity, but, with low quality of evidence, insufficient or unclear results were observed for the remaining measurement properties. Studies evaluating the validity criteria of BOHSE and hypotheses testing of ohr-MDS were considered to have high evidence quality.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The ohr-interRAI can be provisionally recommended for use until further evidence is provided. Further methodologically rigorous studies are needed to assess the measurement properties of the existing instruments.

The effects of examiner fatigue on the diagnostic accuracy of dental radiographs

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to find out whether and to what extent the performance of dentists regarding diagnostic evaluation of dental radiographs is influenced by symptoms of fatigue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a period of 40 minutes, 21 dentists evaluated a database of 96 randomly selected, infinitely repeating intraoral dental radiographs for the presence of periapical radiolucencies. Both before and after, participants were asked to assess their subjective fatigue using the Swedish Occupational Fatigue Inventory (SOFI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) method. Furthermore, the correlation between diagnostic accuracy and radiographic experience, image viewing time, and level of training was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The study showed that despite increasing fatigue, the diagnostic accuracy of the examiners remained consistent with an average AUC value of 0.768 ± 0.091. Within the 40-min reporting period, no statistically significant fluctuations were found. The diagnostic accuracy varied depending on the radiographic experience: with many years of radiographic experience, the diagnostic accuracy increased. At the same time, the older study participants with greater radiographic experience became less tired compared to younger study participants during the examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Although an increase in fatigue was observed during the 40-min examination, the diagnostic accuracy of the doctors remained constant.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Due to the high workload which needs to be handled in a limited time, medical and dental professionals have reached a certain level of exposition to stress that can lead to physical fatigue. However, the increasing fatigue should not negatively influence the work of the doctors. The study shows that the radiodiagnostic accuracy remained the same.