A randomized, controlled study to investigate the efficacy and safety of a topical gentamicin-collagen sponge in combination with systemic antibiotic therapy in diabetic patients with a moderate or severe foot ulcer infection

Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery 2023 guidelines on the diabetic foot

The diabetic foot interacts with anatomical, vascular, and neurological factors that challenge clinical practice. This study aimed to compile the primary scientific evidence based on a review of the main guidelines, in addition to articles published on the Embase, Lilacs, and PubMed platforms. The European Society of Cardiology system was used to develop recommendation classes and levels of evidence. The themes were divided into six chapters (Chapter 1 - Prevention of foot ulcers in people with diabetes; Chapter 2 - Pressure relief from foot ulcers in people with diabetes; Chapter 3 -Classifications of diabetic foot ulcers; Chapter 4 - Foot and peripheral artery disease; Chapter 5 - Infection and the diabetic foot; Chapter 6 - Charcot's neuroarthropathy). This version of the Diabetic Foot Guidelines presents essential recommendations for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with diabetic foot, offering an objective guide for medical practice.

Reconstruction of Orbital Wall Fractures with a Combination of Resorbable Plates and Antibiotic-Impregnated Collagen Sheets

(1) Background: Orbital wall fractures are common in maxillofacial trauma, and artificial implants are often used for reconstruction. However, there has always been concern about infection because implants are directly exposed to the airway. This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a combination of resorbable plates and antibiotic-impregnated collagen sheets in reconstructions of orbital fractures and to determine whether it had an effect in reducing postoperative antibiotic use. (2) Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on 195 patients who underwent orbital wall reconstruction from March 2019 to August 2022. The 176 patients in the control group underwent reconstruction using only resorbable plates and were administered postoperative antibiotics for 5 to 7 days. On the other hand, the 19 patients in the experimental group underwent reconstruction using a combination of resorbable plates and antibiotic-impregnated collagen sheets and only received antibiotics once before surgery. The occurrence of ocular complications, the length of hospitalization, the infection incidence rate, and the adverse effects of antibiotics were investigated. (3) Results: significant ocular complications were observed in the experimental group during a follow-up period of more than 1 year. Regarding postoperative infections, there were two cases of infection in the control group (infection rate: 1.14%), while no infection was found in the experimental group. The hospitalization period of the experimental group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (p < 0.01), and the incidence of total adverse effects of antibiotics, especially nausea, was lower in the experimental group (p = 0.02). (4) Conclusions: The combined use of resorbable plates and antibiotic-impregnated collagen sheets allows effective orbital wall reconstruction without infection, with a shorter hospital stay, and with fewer antibiotic adverse effects.

A Bacterial Responsive Microneedle Dressing with Hydrogel Backing Layer for Chronic Wound Treatment

The treatment of chronic wounds still presents great challenges due to being infected by biofilms and the damaged healing process. The current treatments do not address the needs of chronic wounds. In this study, a highly effective dressing (Dox-DFO@MN Hy) for the treatment of chronic wounds is described. This dressing combines the advantages of microneedles (MNs) and hydrogels in the treatment of chronic wounds. MNs is employed to debride the biofilms and break down the wound barrier, providing rapid access to therapeutic drugs from hydrogel backing layer. Importantly, to kill the pathogenic bacteria in the biofilms specifically, Doxycycline hydrochloride (Dox) is wrapped into the polycaprolactone (PCL) microspheres that have lipase-responsive properties and loaded into the tips of MNs. At the same time, hydrogel backing layer is used to seal the wound and accelerate wound healing. Benefiting from the combination of two advantages of MNs and hydrogel, the dressing significantly reduces the bacteria in the biofilms and effectively promotes angiogenesis and cell migration in vitro. Overall, Dox-DFO@MN Hy can effectively treat chronic wounds infected with biofilms, providing a new idea for the treatment of chronic wounds.

Clinical practice recommendations for infectious disease management of diabetic foot infection (DFI) - 2023 SPILF

In march 2020, the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) published an update of the 2015 guidelines on the diagnosis and management of diabetic foot infection (DFI). While we (the French ID society, SPILF) endorsed some of these recommendations, we wanted to update our own 2006 guidelines and specifically provide informative elements on modalities of microbiological diagnosis and antibiotic treatment (especially first- and second-line regiments, oral switch and duration). The recommendations put forward in the present guidelines are addressed to healthcare professionals managing patients with DFI and more specifically focused on infectious disease management of this type of infection, which clearly needs a multidisciplinary approach. Staging of the severity of the infection is mandatory using the classification drawn up by the IWGDF. Microbiological samples should be taken only in the event of clinical signs suggesting infection in accordance with a strict preliminarily established protocol. Empirical antibiotic therapy should be chosen according to the IWGDF grade of infection and duration of the wound, but must always cover methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Early reevaluation of the patient is a fundamental step, and duration of antibiotic therapy can be shortened in many situations. When osteomyelitis is suspected, standard foot radiograph is the first-line imagery examination and a bone biopsy should be performed for microbiological documentation. Histological analysis of the bone sample is no longer recommended. High dosages of antibiotics are recommended in cases of confirmed osteomyelitis.

Broad-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis in tumor and infected orthopedic surgery-the prospective-randomized, microbiologist-blinded, stratified, superiority trials: BAPTIST Trials

BACKGROUND

The perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with 1st or 2nd generation cephalosporins is evidence-based in orthopedic surgery. There are, however, situations with a high risk of prophylaxis-resistant surgical site infections (SSI).

METHODS

We perform a superiority randomized controlled trial with a 10% margin and a power of 90% in favor of the broad-spectrum prophylaxis. We will randomize orthopedic interventions with a high risk for SSI due to selection of resistant pathogens (open fractures, surgery under therapeutic antibiotics, orthopedic tumor surgery, spine surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3 points) in a prospective-alternating scheme (1:1, standard prophylaxis with cefuroxime versus a broad-spectrum prophylaxis of a combined single-shot of vancomycin 1 g and gentamicin 5 mg/kg parenterally). The primary outcome is "remission" at 6 weeks for most orthopedic surgeries or at 1 year for surgeries with implant. Secondary outcomes are the risk for prophylaxis-resistant SSI pathogens, revision surgery for any reason, change of antibiotic therapy during the treatment of infection, adverse events, and the postoperative healthcare-associated infections other than SSI within 6 weeks (e.g., urine infections or pneumonia). With event-free surgeries to 95% in the broad-spectrum versus 85% in the standard prophylaxis arm, we need 2 × 207 orthopedic surgeries.

DISCUSSION

In selected patients with a high risk for infections due to selection of prophylaxis-resistant SSI, a broad-spectrum combination with vancomycin and gentamycin might prevent SSIs (and other postoperative infections) better than the prophylaxis with cefuroxime.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05502380. Registered on 12 August 2022. Protocol version: 2 (3 June 2022).

Identification of contributing factors, microorganisms and antimicrobial resistance involved in the complication of diabetic foot ulcer treatment

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a neurological and peripherical complication of diabetes with unknown etiology that is often associated with polymicrobial infections. The present study was conducted to investigate the contributing factors in 285 DFU patients, which included 200 patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI). Identification and characterization of infecting bacterial isolates were done followed by assessment of their pattern of susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics. Among the studied subjects, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), ulcer type, depth, grade, loss of sensation, infection type, affected foot, recurrence, smoking status, Body Mass Index (BMI), and obesity levels revealed significant disease risk association. Ulcer grades 1 and 2 were more common in males while grade 3 in females. Recurrent infections were significantly higher in females (P = 0.03). Diabetic duration, hyperglycemia, ulcer type, infection type and BMI were positively correlated with delayed wound healing. In DFI samples, 40.2% consisted of gram-negative bacteria, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (37.5%) being the most common, while in the 60% gram-positive isolates Staphylococcus aureus (40.5%) was the predominant species. Staphylococcus epidermidis was found more frequently in females (P = 0.05). The isolated bacterial strains presented higher resistance against the tested antibiotics; however, ceftriaxone was effective against most of the pathogens. In the current study T2DM along with diabetes duration, obesity, ulcer severity with polymicrobial infection was found to play a strong role in DFI development, where gender predisposition was also observed in ulcer grade and infection. DFI was correlated with loss of sensation, infection type, affected foot, smoking status, BMI and obesity levels.

IWGDF/IDSA Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes-related Foot Infections (IWGDF/IDSA 2023)

The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the management and prevention of diabetes-related foot diseases since 1999. The present guideline is an update of the 2019 IWGDF guideline on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in persons with diabetes mellitus. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used for the development of this guideline. This was structured around identifying clinically relevant questions in the P(A)ICO format, determining patient-important outcomes, systematically reviewing the evidence, assessing the certainty of the evidence, and finally moving from evidence to the recommendation. This guideline was developed for healthcare professionals involved in diabetes-related foot care to inform clinical care around patient-important outcomes. Two systematic reviews from 2019 were updated to inform this guideline, and a total of 149 studies (62 new) meeting inclusion criteria were identified from the updated search and incorporated in this guideline. Updated recommendations are derived from these systematic reviews, and best practice statements made where evidence was not available. Evidence was weighed in light of benefits and harms to arrive at a recommendation. The certainty of the evidence for some recommendations was modified in this update with a more refined application of the GRADE framework centred around patient important outcomes. This is highlighted in the rationale section of this update. A note is also made where the newly identified evidence did not alter the strength or certainty of evidence for previous recommendations. The recommendations presented here continue to cover various aspects of diagnosing soft tissue and bone infections, including the classification scheme for diagnosing infection and its severity. Guidance on how to collect microbiological samples, and how to process them to identify causative pathogens, is also outlined. Finally, we present the approach to treating foot infections in persons with diabetes, including selecting appropriate empiric and definitive antimicrobial therapy for soft tissue and bone infections; when and how to approach surgical treatment; and which adjunctive treatments may or may not affect the infectious outcomes of diabetes-related foot problems. We believe that following these recommendations will help healthcare professionals provide better care for persons with diabetes and foot infections, prevent the number of foot and limb amputations, and reduce the patient and healthcare burden of diabetes-related foot disease.

Metagenomic analysis reveals antibiotic resistance profiles in tissue samples from patients with diabetic foot infections

OBJECTIVES

Treating patients with diabetic foot infection (DFI) is challenging because of high rates of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, to administer a suitable antibiotic treatment, it is necessary to know the antibiotic resistance patterns in DFIs.

METHODS

To explore this question, we selected metagenomic data of 36 tissue samples from patients with DFI in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive database.

RESULTS

A total of 229 antibiotic-resistant gene (ARG) subtypes belonging to 20 ARG types were detected. The antibiotic resistome of 229 different genes in the tissue samples of patients with DFI comprised 24 core and 205 accessory resistance genes. Among the core antibiotic resistome, multidrug, tetracycline, macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin, and beta-lactam resistance genes were the dominant categories. Procrustes analysis indicated that both the microbial community composition and mobile genetic elements (MGEs) were determinants of the ARGs. In the network analysis, 29 species were speculated to be potential hosts of 28 ARGs based on the co-occurrence results. Plasmids and transposons were the most common elements that co-occurred with ARGs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provided detailed information about antibiotic resistance patterns in DFI, which has practical implications for suggesting a more specific antibiotic choice.

What’s old is new again: Insights into diabetic foot microbiome

Diabetes is a chronic disease that is considered one of the most stubborn global health problems that continues to defy the efforts of scientists and physicians. The prevalence of diabetes in the global population continues to grow to alarming levels year after year, causing an increase in the incidence of diabetes complications and health care costs all over the world. One major complication of diabetes is the high susceptibility to infections especially in the lower limbs due to the immunocompromised state of diabetic patients, which is considered a definitive factor in all cases. Diabetic foot infections continue to be one of the most common infections in diabetic patients that are associated with a high risk of serious complications such as bone infection, limb amputations, and life-threatening systemic infections. In this review, we discussed the circumstances associated with the high risk of infection in diabetic patients as well as some of the most commonly isolated pathogens from diabetic foot infections and the related virulence behavior. In addition, we shed light on the different treatment strategies that aim at eradicating the infection.

The Epidemiology of Antibiotic-Related Adverse Events in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections: A Narrative Review of the Literature

The use of antibiotics for the treatment of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) over an extended period of time has been shown to be associated with adverse events (AEs), whereas interactions with concomitant patient medications must also be considered. The objective of this narrative review was to summarize the most frequent and most severe AEs reported in prospective trials and observational studies at the global level in DFI. Gastrointestinal intolerances were the most frequent AEs, from 5% to 22% among all therapies; this was more common when prolonged antibiotic administration was combined with oral beta-lactam or clindamycin or a higher dose of tetracyclines. The proportion of symptomatic colitis due to Clostridium difficile was variable depending on the antibiotic used (0.5% to 8%). Noteworthy serious AEs included hepatotoxicity due to beta-lactams (5% to 17%) or quinolones (3%); cytopenia's related to linezolid (5%) and beta-lactams (6%); nausea under rifampicin, and renal failure under cotrimoxazole. Skin rash was found to rarely occur and was commonly associated with the use of penicillins or cotrimoxazole. AEs from prolonged antibiotic use in patients with DFI are costly in terms of longer hospitalization or additional monitoring care and can trigger additional investigations. The best way to prevent AEs is to keep the duration of antibiotic treatment short and with the lowest dose clinically necessary.

Wound Dressing Modifications for Accelerated Healing of Infected Wounds

Infections that occur during wound healing involve the most frequent complications in the field of wound care which not only inhibit the whole process but also lead to non-healing wound formation. The diversity of the skin microbiota and the wound microenvironment can favor the occurrence of skin infections, contributing to an increased level of morbidity and even mortality. As a consequence, immediate effective treatment is required to prevent such pathological conditions. Antimicrobial agents loaded into wound dressings have turned out to be a great option to reduce wound colonization and improve the healing process. In this review paper, the influence of bacterial infections on the wound-healing phases and promising modifications of dressing materials for accelerated healing of infected wounds are discussed. The review paper mainly focuses on the novel findings on the use of antibiotics, nanoparticles, cationic organic agents, and plant-derived natural compounds (essential oils and their components, polyphenols, and curcumin) to develop antimicrobial wound dressings. The review article was prepared on the basis of scientific contributions retrieved from the PubMed database (supported with Google Scholar searching) over the last 5 years.

Antibiotic-loaded bone substitutes therapy in the management of the moderate to severe diabetic foot infection: A meta-analysis

In recent years, local antibiotic-loaded bone substitutes (ALBS) have been used increasingly in the treatment of diabetic foot infection (DFI). The meta-analysis aimed to analyse the efficacy of ALBS on patients with moderate to severe DFI (with or without osteomyelitis). With an appropriate search strategy, 7 studies were selected for analysis (2 RCTs and 5 cohort studies). The result showed that the application of ALBS effectively reduced the length of hospital stay (WMD -5.55; 95% CI: -9.85 to -1.26; P = 0.01), the recurrence rates (RR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.69; P = 0.003) and the mortality rates (RR 0.22; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.82; P = 0.02). Compared to the control groups, however, there was no difference in healing rates (RR 1.06; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.18; P = 0.26), healing time (WMD -1.44; 95% CI: -3.37 to -0.49; P = 0.14), the number of debridement (WMD -1.98; 95% CI: -4.08 to 0.12; P = 0.06) and major amputation rates (RR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.35 to 1.61; P = 0.47). The ALBS appears to have some beneficial effects as an adjunct to standard surgery in the treatment of DFI with or without osteomyelitis, as it reduces recurrence rates, mortality rates, and length of hospital stay, but there was no statistically significant difference in enhancing wound healing.

Influence of Skin Commensals on Therapeutic Outcomes of Surgically Debrided Diabetic Foot Infections-A Large Retrospective Comparative Study

In diabetic foot infections (DFI), the clinical virulence of skin commensals are generally presumed to be low. In this single-center study, we divided the wound isolates into two groups: skin commensals (coagulase-negative staphylococci, micrococci, corynebacteria, cutibacteria) and pathogenic pathogens, and followed the patients for ≥ 6 months. In this retrospective study among 1018 DFI episodes (392 [39%] with osteomyelitis), we identified skin commensals as the sole culture isolates (without accompanying pathogenic pathogens) in 54 cases (5%). After treatment (antibiotic therapy [median of 20 days], hyperbaric oxygen in 98 cases [10%]), 251 episodes (25%) were clinical failures. Group comparisons between those growing only skin commensals and controls found no difference in clinical failure (17% vs. 24 %, p = 0.23) or microbiological recurrence (11% vs. 17 %, p = 0.23). The skin commensals were mostly treated with non-beta-lactam oral antibiotics. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the isolation of only skin commensals was not associated with failure (odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval 0.1-3.8). Clinicians might wish to consider these isolates as potential pathogens when selecting a targeted antibiotic regimen, which may also be based on oral non-beta-lactam antibiotic agents effective against the corresponding skin pathogens.

A Highly Efficacious Electrical Biofilm Treatment System for Combating Chronic Wound Bacterial Infections

Biofilm infection has a high prevalence in chronic wounds and can delay wound healing. Current treatment using debridement and antibiotic administration imposes a significant burden on patients and healthcare systems. To address their limitations, a highly efficacious electrical antibiofilm treatment system is described in this paper. This system uses high-intensity current (75 mA cm-2 ) to completely debride biofilm above the wound surface and enhance antibiotic delivery into biofilm-infected wounds simultaneously. Combining these two effects, this system uses short treatments (≤2 h) to reduce bacterial count of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) biofilm-infected ex vivo skin wounds from 1010 to 105.2 colony-forming units (CFU) g-1 . Taking advantage of the hydrogel ionic circuit design, this system enhances the in vivo safety of high-intensity current application compared to conventional devices. The in vivo antibiofilm efficacy of the system is tested using a diabetic mouse-based wound infection model. MRSA biofilm bacterial count decreases from 109.0 to 104.6 CFU g-1 at 1 day post-treatment and to 103.3 CFU g-1 at 7 days post-treatment, both of which are below the clinical threshold for infection. Overall, this novel technology provides a quick, safe, yet highly efficacious treatment to chronic wound biofilm infections.

Local Antibiotics in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Infections: A Narrative Review

Along with the increasing global burden of diabetes, diabetic foot infections (DFI) and diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) remain major challenges for patients and society. Despite progress in the development of prominent international guidelines, the optimal medical treatment for DFI and DFO remains unclear as to whether local antibiotics, that is, topical agents and local delivery systems, should be used alone or concomitant to conventional systemic antibiotics. To better inform clinicians in this evolving field, we performed a narrative review and summarized key relevant observational studies and clinical trials of non-prophylactic local antibiotics for the treatment of DFI and DFO, both alone and in combination with systemic antibiotics. We searched PubMed for studies published between January 2000 and October 2022, identified 388 potentially eligible records, and included 19 studies. Our findings highlight that evidence for adding local antibiotic delivery systems to standard DFO treatment remains limited. Furthermore, we found that so far, local antibiotic interventions have mainly targeted forefoot DFO, although there is marked variation in the design of the included studies. Suggestive evidence emerging from observational studies underscores that the addition of local agents to conventional systemic antibiotics might help to shorten the clinical healing time and overall recovery rates in infected diabetic foot ulcers, although the effectiveness of local antibiotics as a standalone approach remains overlooked. In conclusion, despite the heterogeneous body of evidence, the possibility that the addition of local antibiotics to conventional systemic treatment may improve outcomes in DFI and DFO cannot be ruled out. Antibiotic stewardship principles call for further research to elucidate the potential benefits of local antibiotics alone and in combination with conventional systemic antibiotics for the treatment of DFI and DFO.

Biocompatible curdlan-based biomaterials loaded with gentamicin and Zn-doped nano-hydroxyapatite as promising dressing materials for the treatment of infected wounds and prevention of surgical site infections

A topical application of antibiotic-loaded wound dressings is recommended only for chronically infected wounds with poor vascularization. Thus, more often dressing materials loaded with antibacterial metal ions are produced. In turn, gentamicin sponges are commonly used to prevent surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to produce curdlan-based biomaterials enriched with gentamicin and zinc (Zn)-doped nano-hydroxyapatite to prevent wound and surgical site infections. Developed biomaterials were subjected to basic microstructural characterization, cytotoxicity test against human skin fibroblasts (BJ cell line), and comprehensive microbiological experiments using Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. To evaluate the in vivo healing capacity of the developed biomaterials, severely infected chronic wound in a veterinary patient was treated with the use of gentamicin-loaded dressing. Fabricated biomaterials were characterized by a highly porous microstructure with high plasma absorption capacity (approx. 7 mL/g for Zn-loaded biomaterial and 13 mL/g for gentamicin-enriched dressing) and optimal water vapor transmission rate (approx. 1700 g/m²/day). Due to the presence of bioceramics, material containing Zn showed slightly higher compressive strength (0.37 MPa) and Young's modulus (3.33 MPa) values compared to gentamicin-loaded biomaterial (0.12 MPa and 1.29 MPa, respectively). Gentamicin-enriched biomaterial showed burst release of the drug within the first 5 h, while, the zinc-loaded biomaterial exhibited a constant gradual release of the zinc ions. Conducted assays showed that developed biomaterials were non-toxic against human skin fibroblasts (cell viability in the range of 71-95 %) and revealed strong bactericidal activity (99.9 % reduction in the number of viable bacterial CFUs in direct contact test) against S. aureus. In the case of P. aeruginosa, only gentamicin-loaded biomaterial exhibited bactericidal effect. Additionally, biomaterials had the ability to uptake, lock in, and kill bacteria within their gel structure, enabling the cleansing of the wound bed at every dressing change. Finally, the treatment of severely infected wound in veterinary patient confirmed the effectiveness of gentamicin-loaded biomaterial. Biomaterial enriched with gentamicin possesses great potential to be used as a dressing material or sponge for the treatment of chronically infected wounds and surgical site infections. In turn, the zinc-loaded biomaterial may be used as a wound dressing to reduce and prevent microbial contamination.

Moderate to Severe Soft Tissue Diabetic Foot Infections: A Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Trial of Post-debridement Antibiotic Treatment for 10 versus 20 days

BACKGROUND

The optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for soft-tissue infections of the diabetic foot remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We determine if antibiotic therapy after debridement for a short (10 days), compared with a long (20 days), duration for soft-tissue infections of the diabetic foot results in similar rates of clinical remission and adverse events (AE).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal duration of systemic antibiotic therapy, after successful debridement, for soft tissue infections of diabetic patients is unknown. Because of the high recurrence risk, overuse is commonplace.

METHODS

This was a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority pilot trial of cases of diabetic foot infection (excluding osteomyelitis) with the primary outcome of "clinical remission at 2-months follow-up".

RESULTS

Among 66 enrolled episodes (17% females; median age 71 years), we randomized 35 to the 10-day arm and 31 to the 20-day arm. The median duration of the parenteral antibiotic therapy was 1 day, with the remainder given orally. In the intention-to-treat population, we achieved clinical remission in 27 (77%) patients in the 10-day arm compared to 22 (71%) in the 20-days arm ( P = 0.57). There were a similar proportion in each arm of AE (14/35 versus 11/31; P = 0.71), and remission in the per-protocol population (25/32 vs 18/27; P = 0.32). Overall, 8 soft tissue DFIs in the 10-day arm and 5 cases in the 20-day arm recurred as a new osteomyelitis [8/35 (23%) versus 5/31 (16%); P = 0.53]. Overall, the number of recurrences limited to the soft tissues was 4 (6%). By multivariate analysis, rates of remission (intention-to-treat population, hazard ratio 0.6, 95%CI 0.3-1.1; per-protocol population 0.8, 95%CI 0.4-1.5) and AE were not significantly different with a 10-day compared to 20-day course.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized, controlled pilot trial, post-debridement antibiotic therapy for soft tissue DFI for 10 days gave similar (and non-inferior) rates of remission and AEs to 20 days. A larger confirmatory trial is under way.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials NCT03615807.

Exploring the Role of Staphylococcus aureus in Inflammatory Diseases

Staphylococcus aureus is a very common Gram-positive bacterium, and S. aureus infections play an extremely important role in a variety of diseases. This paper describes the types of virulence factors involved, the inflammatory cells activated, the process of host cell death, and the associated diseases caused by S. aureus. S. aureus can secrete a variety of enterotoxins and other toxins to trigger inflammatory responses and activate inflammatory cells, such as keratinocytes, helper T cells, innate lymphoid cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, mast cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils. Activated inflammatory cells can express various cytokines and induce an inflammatory response. S. aureus can also induce host cell death through pyroptosis, apoptosis, necroptosis, autophagy, etc. This article discusses S. aureus and MRSA (methicillin-resistant S. aureus) in atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, pulmonary cystic fibrosis, allergic asthma, food poisoning, sarcoidosis, multiple sclerosis, and osteomyelitis. Summarizing the pathogenic mechanism of Staphylococcus aureus provides a basis for the targeted treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Pseudomonal Diabetic Foot Infections: Vive la Différence?

Objective

To assess the outcomes of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Patients and Methods

From April 24, 2013 to July 31, 2016, we analyzed data from patients prospectively enrolled in our clinical pathway of DFIs, comparing those with infection due to Pseudomonas with those without infection due to Pseudomonas.

Results

Overall, we assessed 1018 cases of DFIs: 392 with osteomyelitis and 626 with only soft tissue infections. The prevalence of P aeruginosa in deep wound cultures was 10% (104/1018); of the 1018 cultures, 22 were monomicrobial, 82 were polymicrobial, and 46 were with osteomyelitis. Overall, the patients were treated with a median of 1 surgical debridement and a total of 20 days of antibiotic therapy. In a comparison of crude groups, the proportion of clinical failures was significantly higher with Pseudomonas than with other pathogens (36/104 [35%] vs 218/914 [24%], respectively; P=.02). A multivariate analysis showed that pseudomonal DFIs did not recur more often than nonpseudomonal DFIs (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-1.7). Among the 104 cases of pseudomonal DFIs, there was no association between failure of treatment and the total duration of antibiotic therapy, duration of intravenous therapy, duration of combined antibiotic therapy with more than 1 agent, or duration of oral (fluoroquinolone) therapy. Among 15 cases of pseudomonal recurrence, 2 (13%) developed resistance to the antibiotic agent used for the index episode.

Conclusion

For DFIs caused by P aeruginosa, other than choosing an antibiotic agent that is active against the organism, it does not appear necessary to treat with a different therapeutic regimen compared with the treatment of nonpseudomonal DFIs. There is no difference!

Short and oral antimicrobial therapy for diabetic foot infection: a narrative review of current knowledge

Diabetic foot infection is a frequent complication in long-standing diabetes mellitus. For antimicrobial therapy of this infection, both the optimal duration and the route of administration are often based more on expert opinion than on published evidence. We reviewed the scientific literature, specifically seeking prospective trials, and aimed at addressing two clinical issues: (1) shortening the currently recommended antibiotic duration and (2) using oral (rather than parenteral) therapy, especially after the patient has undergone debridement and revascularization. We also reviewed some older key articles that are critical to our understanding of the treatment of these infections, particularly with respect to diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Our conclusion is that the maximum duration of antibiotic therapy for osteomyelitis should be no more than to 4-6 weeks and might even be shorter in selected cases. In the future, in addition to conducting randomized trials and propagating national and international guidance, we should also explore innovative strategies, such as intraosseous antibiotic agents and bacteriophages.

A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Antibiotic Use in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infections: Focus on Clinical Cure

BACKGROUND

The use of antibiotics in diabetic foot ulcer infections (DFUI) is essential in reducing morbidity. Optimal administration of antibiotics can improve clinical outcomes and reduce the risk of antibiotic resistance. This study aims to review the efficacy, in terms of clinical cure, of various regimens and the duration of antibiotic administration in DFUI patients, based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The efficacy based on microbiological response is also reviewed as the secondary outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used three databases, namely PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, to search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with DFUI who required antibiotics.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies were included in the systematic review. The study locations and bacterial patterns varied, with the most common pathogen being Staphylococcus aureus. Most studies did not demonstrate a significant difference in clinical cure and pathogen eradication, either in the comparison between systemic and topical antibiotics or in the duration of administration. Some studies had similar characteristics and were analyzed to conclude. These studies showed that ertapenem had comparable efficacy to piperacillin/tazobactam. Similar results were also conducted from studies of piperacillin-tazobactam+amoxicillin-clavulanic acid vs. moxifloxacin.

CONCLUSION

Most studies have heterogeneous characteristics, possibly due to differences in research location. Therefore, there is no strong evidence to recommend a specific antibiotic with the highest efficacy. However, since all included studies are RCTs, this review provides a good summary in considering antibiotic choices when treating DFUI patients.

Alternative Approaches for the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) represent a growing public health problem. The emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is a complication due to the difficulties in distinguishing between infection and colonization in DFU. Another problem lies in biofilm formation on the skin surface of DFU. Biofilm is an important pathophysiology step in DFU and may contribute to healing delays. Both MDR bacteria and biofilm producing microorganism create hostile conditions to antibiotic action that lead to chronicity of the wound, followed by infection and, in the worst scenario, lower limb amputation. In this context, alternative approaches to antibiotics for the management of DFU would be very welcome. In this review, we discuss current knowledge on biofilm in DFU and we focus on some new alternative solutions for the management of these wounds, such as antibiofilm approaches that could prevent the establishment of microbial biofilms and wound chronicity. These innovative therapeutic strategies could replace or complement the classical strategy for the management of DFU to improve the healing process.

A Comparative Analysis of Antibiotic Usage in Diabetic Foot Infections Against Healing Time

The study aimed to analyze bacterial flora in diabetic foot infection, empiric and targeted antibiotic therapy, and factors influencing wound healing duration. The study we undertook a review analysis of data in 118 cases of diabetic foot among 98 patients who reported to the Wound Care Clinic in Warsaw, Poland between 01/2014 and 12/2018. Collected data included sociodemographic data, wounds information, used treatment, results of the microbiological examination, and empiric and targeted antibiotic therapy. For purposes of identifying the empirical and targeted antibiotic compatibility, the patients were divided into subgroups: ETA+ (compatibility of empiric-targeted antibiotic), ETA- (non-compatibility of empiric-targeted antibiotic), NEA (no empiric antibiotic), and NTA (no targeted antibiotic). The study group consisted of men, N = 71 (72.4%) and women, N = 27 (27.6%). Twenty patients (20.4%) were diagnosed as obese according to the body mass index classification. Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis were identified in most cases [N = 53 (24.4%), and N = 41 (18.9%), respectively]. Sixteen patients (13.6%) received gentamycin locally. Amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, clindamycin, and levofloxacin were the most frequently used antibiotics as empiric therapy; meanwhile, in targeted therapy, amoxicillin with clavulanic acid and levofloxacin were most frequently used. Empiric and targeted antibiotic therapies were compatible in 65 (55.1%) cases. The duration of healing did not differ between selected subgroups, and was longer in obese patients (p = .001). Other variables did not influence the healing time. The use of empiric antibiotic therapy before targeted therapy and the topical use of gentamycin did not reduce the healing time of diabetic foot infection. The healing time of diabetic foot infection was longer in obese patients than in nonobese patients.

The Insights of Microbes' Roles in Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Review

A diverse range of normal flora populates the human skin and numbers are relatively different between individuals and parts of the skin. Humans and normal flora have formed a symbiotic relationship over a period of time. With numerous disease processes, the interaction between the host and normal flora can be interrupted. Unlike normal wound healing, which is complex and crucial to sustaining the skin’s physical barrier, chronic wounds, especially in diabetes, are wounds that fail to heal in a timely manner. The conditions become favorable for microbes to colonize and establish infections within the skin. These include secretions of various kinds of molecules, substances or even trigger the immune system to attack other cells required for wound healing. Additionally, the healing process can be slowed down by prolonging the inflammatory phase and delaying the wound repair process, which causes further destruction to the tissue. Antibiotics and wound dressings become the targeted therapy to treat chronic wounds. Though healing rates are improved, prolonged usage of these treatments could become ineffective or microbes may become resistant to the treatments. Considering all these factors, more studies are needed to comprehensively elucidate the role of human skin normal flora at the cellular and molecular level in a chronic injury. This article will review wound healing physiology and discuss the role of normal flora in the skin and chronic wounds.

Challenges in the management of chronic wound infections

OBJECTIVES

Chronic wound infections may delay the healing process and are responsible for a significant burden on healthcare systems. Since inappropriate management may commonly occur in the care of these patients, this review aims to provide a practical guide underlining actions to avoid in the management of chronic wound infections.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature available in PubMed in the last 10 years, identifying studies regarding the management of patients with chronic wound infections. A panel of experts discussed the potential malpractices in this area. A list of 'Don'ts', including the main actions to be avoided, was drawn up using the 'Choosing Wisely' methodology.

RESULTS

In this review, we proposed a list of actions to avoid for optimal management of patients with chronic wound infections. Adequate wound bed preparation and wound antisepsis should be combined, as the absence of one of them leads to delayed healing and a higher risk of wound complications. Moreover, avoiding inappropriate use of systemic antibiotics is an important point because of the risk of selection of multidrug-resistant organisms as well as antibiotic-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary team of experts in different fields (surgeon, infectious disease expert, microbiologist, pharmacologist, geriatrician) is required for the optimal management of chronic wound infections. Implementation of this approach may be useful to improve the management of patients with chronic wound infections.

Treating Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Practical State-of-the-Art Update

Background and Objectives: Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) can be difficult to treat and securing optimal clinical outcomes requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a wide variety of medical, surgical and other health care professionals, as well as the patient. Results of studies conducted in the past few years have allowed experts to formulate guidelines that can improve clinical outcomes. Material and Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature on treat- ment of DFO, with an emphasis on studies published in the last two years, especially regarding antimicrobial therapies and surgical approached to treatment of DFO, supplemented by our own extensive clinical and research experience in this field. Results: Major amputations were once com- mon for DFO but, with improved diagnostic and surgical techniques, "conservative" surgery (foot- sparing, resecting only the infected and necrotic bone) is becoming commonplace, especially for forefoot infections. Traditional antibiotic therapy, which has been administered predominantly in- travenously and frequently for several months, can often be replaced by appropriately selected oral antibiotic regimens following only a brief (or even no) parenteral therapy, and given for no more than 6 weeks. Based on ongoing studies, the recommended duration of treatment may soon be even shorter, especially for cases in which a substantial portion of the infected bone has been resected. Using the results of cultures (preferably of bone specimens) and antimicrobial stewardship princi- ples allows clinicians to select evidence-based antibiotic regimens, often of a limited pathogen spec- trum. Intra-osseous antimicrobial and surgical approaches to treatment are also evolving in light of ongoing research. Conclusions: In this narrative, evidenced-based review, taking consideration of principles of antimicrobial stewardship and good surgical practice, we have highlighted the recent literature and offered practical, state-of-the-art advice on the antibiotic and surgical management of DFO.

Three versus six weeks of antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot osteomyelitis: A prospective, randomized, non-inferiority pilot trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) who underwent surgical debridement, we investigated whether a short (3 weeks), compared with a long (6 weeks) duration of systemic antibiotic treatment is associated with non-inferior results for clinical remission and adverse events (AE).

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, non-inferiority, pilot trial, we randomized (allocation 1:1), patients with DFO after surgical debridement to either a 3-week or a 6-week course of antibiotic therapy. The minimal duration of follow-up after end of therapy was two months. We compared outcomes using Cox regression and non-inferiority analyses (25% margin, power 80%).

RESULTS

Among 93 enrolled patients (18% females; median age 65 years), 44 were randomized to the 3-week arm and 49 to the 6-week arm. The median number of surgical debridement was 1 (range, 0-2 interventions). In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, remission occurred in 37 (84%) of the patients in the 3-week arm compared to 36 (73%) in the 6-week arm (p=0.21). The number of AE was similar in the two study arms (17/44 vs. 16/49; p=0.51), as were the remission incidences in the per-protocol (PP) population (33/39 vs. 32/43; p=0.26). In multivariate analysis, treatment with the shorter antibiotic course was not significantly associated with remission (for the ITT population, hazard ratio 1.1, 95%CI 0.6-1.7; for the PP population hazard ratio 0.8, 95%CI 0.5-1.4).

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized, controlled pilot trial, a post-debridement systemic antibiotic therapy course for DFO of 3-weeks gave similar (and statistically non-inferior) incidences of remission and AE to a course of 6 weeks.

Antibacterial-Integrated Collagen Wound Dressing for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers: An Evidence-Based Review of Clinical Studies

Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a chronic wound frequently delayed from severe infection. Wound dressing provides an essential barrier between the ulcer and the external environment. This review aimed to analyse the effectiveness of antibacterial collagen-based dressing for DFU treatment in a clinical setting. An electronic search in four databases, namely, Scopus, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE(R), and ISI Web of Science, was performed to obtain relevant articles published within the last ten years. The published studies were included if they reported evidence of (1) collagen-based antibacterial dressing or (2) wound healing for diabetic ulcers, and (3) were written in English. Both randomised and non-randomised clinical trials were included. The search for relevant clinical studies (n) identified eight related references discussing the effectiveness of collagen-based antibacterial wound dressings for DFU comprising collagen impregnated with polyhexamethylene biguanide (n = 2), gentamicin (n = 3), combined-cellulose and silver (n = 1), gentian violet/methylene blue mixed (n = 1), and silver (n = 1). The clinical data were limited by small sample sizes and multiple aetiologies of chronic wounds. The evidence was not robust enough for a conclusive statement, although most of the studies reported positive outcomes for the use of collagen dressings loaded with antibacterial properties for DFU wound healing. This study emphasises the importance of having standardised clinical trials, larger sample sizes, and accurate reporting for reliable statistical evidence confirming DFU treatment efficiency.

Designed sponges based on chitosan and cyclodextrin polymer for a local release of ciprofloxacin in diabetic foot infections

Diabetic foot infections are the most common complications requiring hospitalisation of patients with diabetes. They often result in amputation to extremities and are associated with high morbi-mortality rates, especially when bone is infected. Treatment of these complications is based on surgical procedures, nursing care and systemic antibiotic therapy for several weeks, with a significant risk of relapse. Due to low blood flow and damage caused by diabetic foot infection, blood supply is decreased, causing low antibiotic diffusion in the infected site and an increase of possible bacterial resistance, making this type of infection particularly difficult to treat. In this context, the aim of this work was to develop a medical device for local antibiotic release. The device is a lyophilized physical hydrogel, i.e a sponge based on two oppositely charged polyelectrolytes (chitosan and poly(cyclodextrin citrate)). Cyclodextrins, via inclusion complexes, increase drug bioavailability and allow an extended release. Using local release administration increases concentrations in the wound without risk of toxicity to the body and prevents the emergence of resistant bacteria. The hydrogel was characterised by rheology. After freeze-drying, a curing process was implemented. The swelling rate and cell viability were evaluated, and finally, the sponge was impregnated with a ciprofloxacin solution to evaluate its drug release profile and its antibacterial activity.

Principles and practice of antibiotic stewardship in the management of diabetic foot infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic antibiotic therapy in persons with a diabetic foot infection (DFI) is frequent, increasing the risk of promoting resistance to common pathogens. Applying principles of antibiotic stewardship may help avoid this problem.

RECENT FINDINGS

We performed a systematic review of the literature, especially seeking recently published studies, for data on the role and value of antibiotic stewardship (especially reducing the spectrum and duration of antibiotic therapy) in community and hospital populations of persons with a DFI.

SUMMARY

We found very few publications specifically concerning antibiotic stewardship in persons with a DFI. The case-mix of these patients is substantial and infection plays only one part among several chronic problems. As with other types of infections, attempting to prevent infections and avoiding or reducing the spectrum and duration of antibiotic therapy are perhaps the best ways to reduce antibiotic prescribing in the DFI population. The field is complex and necessitates knowledge over the current scientific literature and clinical experience. On a larger scale, clinical pathways, guidelines, and recommendations are additionally supportive.

Interventions in the management of infection in the foot in diabetes: a systematic review

The optimal approaches to managing diabetic foot infections remain a challenge for clinicians. Despite an exponential rise in publications investigating different treatment strategies, the various agents studied generally produce comparable results, and high-quality data are scarce. In this systematic review, we searched the medical literature using the PubMed and Embase databases for published studies on the treatment of diabetic foot infections as of June 2018. This systematic review is an update of previous reviews, the first of which was undertaken in 2010 and the most recent in 2014, by the infection committee of the International Working Group of the Diabetic Foot. We defined the context of literature by formulating clinical questions of interest, then developing structured clinical questions (PICOs) to address these. We only included data from controlled studies of an intervention to prevent or cure a diabetic foot infection. Two independent reviewers selected articles for inclusion and then assessed their relevant outcomes and the methodological quality. Our literature search identified a total of 15 327 articles, of which we selected 48 for full-text review; we added five more studies discovered by means other than the systematic literature search. Among these selected articles were 11 high-quality studies published in the last 4 years and two Cochrane systematic reviews. Overall, the outcomes in patients treated with the different antibiotic regimens for both skin and soft tissue infection and osteomyelitis of the diabetic foot were broadly equivalent across studies, except that treatment with tigecycline was inferior to ertapenem (±vancomycin). Similar outcomes were also reported in studies comparing primarily surgical and predominantly antibiotic treatment strategies in selected patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. There is insufficient high-quality evidence to assess the effect of various adjunctive therapies, such as negative pressure wound therapy, topical ointments or hyperbaric oxygen, on infection related outcomes of the diabetic foot. In general, the quality of more recent trial designs are better in past years, but there is still a great need for further well-designed trials to produce higher quality evidence to underpin our recommendations.

Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)

The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) has published evidence-based guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease since 1999. This guideline is on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes and updates the 2015 IWGDF infection guideline. On the basis of patient, intervention, comparison, outcomes (PICOs) developed by the infection committee, in conjunction with internal and external reviewers and consultants, and on systematic reviews the committee conducted on the diagnosis of infection (new) and treatment of infection (updated from 2015), we offer 27 recommendations. These cover various aspects of diagnosing soft tissue and bone infection, including the classification scheme for diagnosing infection and its severity. Of note, we have updated this scheme for the first time since we developed it 15 years ago. We also review the microbiology of diabetic foot infections, including how to collect samples and to process them to identify causative pathogens. Finally, we discuss the approach to treating diabetic foot infections, including selecting appropriate empiric and definitive antimicrobial therapy for soft tissue and for bone infections, when and how to approach surgical treatment, and which adjunctive treatments we think are or are not useful for the infectious aspects of diabetic foot problems. For this version of the guideline, we also updated four tables and one figure from the 2016 guideline. We think that following the principles of diagnosing and treating diabetic foot infections outlined in this guideline can help clinicians to provide better care for these patients.

Management of diabetic foot infections in the light of recent literature and new international guidelines

Introduction: In May 2019 the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) launched their quadrennially updated guidelines on the management of diabetic foot infections (DFIs). Concomitantly, the number of new publications regarding DFI increased.Areas covered: The IWGDF committee developed and addressed key questions and produced evidence-based recommendations related to diagnosing and treating DFIs. This narrative review provides an overview of this new guideline and also of other recently published literature in the field of DFIs.Expert opinion: The 2019 IWGDF guidelines provide an authoritative, international, evidence-based approach to diagnosing and treating DFIs. The 27 recommendations are supported by systematic reviews of both diagnosis and interventions. Our review of this guideline, along with other recent publications in the field, allows us to offer state-of-the-art guidance for caring for these difficult infections. As the evidence base for management of DFIs remains suboptimal, we need further research to improve the management of DFIs.

Optimization of the antibiotic management of diabetic foot infections: protocol for two randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Few studies have addressed the appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot infections (DFI) with or without amputation. We will perform two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to reduce the antibiotic use and associated adverse events in DFI.

METHODS

We hypothesize that shorter durations of postdebridement systemic antibiotic therapy are noninferior (10% margin, 80% power, alpha 5%) to existing (long) durations and we will perform two unblinded RCTs with a total of 400 DFI episodes (randomization 1:1) from 2019 to 2022. The primary outcome for both RCTs is remission of infection after a minimal follow-up of 2 months. The secondary outcomes for both RCTs are the incidence of adverse events and the overall treatment costs. The first RCT will allocate the total therapeutic amputations in two arms of 50 patients each: 1 versus 3 weeks of antibiotic therapy for residual osteomyelitis (positive microbiological samples of the residual bone stump); or 1 versus 4 days for remaining soft tissue infection. The second RCT will randomize the conservative approach (only surgical debridement without in toto amputation) in two arms with 50 patients each: 10 versus 20 days of antibiotic therapy for soft tissue infections; and 3 versus 6 weeks for osteomyelitis. All participants will have professional wound debridement, adequate off-loading, angiology evaluation, and a concomitant surgical, re-educational, podiatric, internist and infectiology care. During the surgeries, we will collect tissues for BioBanking and future laboratory studies.

DISCUSSION

Both parallel RCTs will respond to frequent questions regarding the duration of antibiotic use in the both major subsets of DFIs, to ensure the quality of care, and to avoid unnecessary excesses in terms of surgery and antibiotic use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04081792. Registered on 4 September 2019.

Stopping antibiotics after surgical amputation in diabetic foot and ankle infections-A daily practice cohort

OBJECTIVE

The appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot infections (DFI) after surgical amputations in toto is debated. There are discrepancies worldwide.

METHODS

Using a clinical pathway for adult DFI patients (retrospective cohort analysis), we conducted a cluster-controlled Cox regression analysis. Minimum follow-up was 2 months.

RESULTS

We followed 482 amputated DFI episodes for a median of 2.1 years after the index episode. The DFIs predominately affected the forefoot (n = 433; 90%). We diagnosed osteomyelitis in 239 cases (239/482; 50%). In total, 47 cases (10%) were complicated by bacteremia, 86 (18%) by abscesses and 139 (29%) presented with cellulitis. Surgical amputation involved the toes (n = 155), midfoot (280) and hindfoot (47). Overall, 178 cases (37%) required revascularization. After amputation, the median duration of antibiotic administration was 7 days (interquartile range, 1-16 days). In 109 cases (25%), antibiotics were discontinued immediately after surgery. Overall, clinical failure occurred in 90 DFIs (17%), due to the same pathogens in only 38 cases. In multivariate analysis, neither duration of total postsurgical antibiotic administration (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.99-1.01) nor immediate postoperative discontinuation altered failure rate (HR 0.9, 0.5-1.5).

CONCLUSION

According to our clinical pathway, we found no benefit in continuing postsurgical antibiotic administration in routine amputation for DFI. In the absence of residual infection (ie, resection at clear margins), antibiotics should be discontinued.

A novel gentamicin-releasing wound dressing prepared from freshwater fish Cyprinus carpio collagen cross-linked with carbodiimide

Our study presents a novel collagen wound dressing prepared from freshwater fish skin ( Cyprinus Carpio) collagen type I. Half of the sponges were cross-linked with carbodiimide. The cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen sponges were subsequently impregnated with gentamicin and lyophilized thus allowing for the attainment of the appropriate gentamicin content without the removal thereof during the cross-linking stage. The structure was evaluated via micro-CT and infrared spectrometry and the structural stability and gentamicin release properties were evaluated in phosphate buffer solution. The sponges were further tested via a rat model of an infected wound with Pseudomonas aeruginosa inoculation and compared with a reference commercial product. The sponges thus prepared provided a degree of open porosity that was comparable to or higher than that of the reference commercial product. Spectrometry analysis revealed that the cross-linked collagen sponge and reference commercial product sponge preserved their secondary collagen structure after 168 h while early accelerated degradation was observed with respect to the non-cross-linked collagen sponge. Gentamicin was released rapidly from all the sponges. Compared to those animals with gentamicin-containing sponges or gentamicin administered intramuscularly, the animals with the cross-linked collagen sponge without gentamicin exhibited marked clinical and laboratory infection signs. Both the administration routes (intramuscular and via gentamicin-containing sponges) provided similar gentamicin plasma levels. The resulting highly homogeneous product which was characterized by excellent structural and clinical properties proved effective in terms of the treatment of a surgical wound infection in a rat model. We demonstrated that all the gentamicin was released from the sponge and was absorbed in the systemic circulation. This is the first time that Cyprinus Carpio collagen has been used in the preparation of wound dressings. Thus, gentamicin-containing sponges provide a promising tool for the treatment and prevention of surgical site infections.