1
|
Sezer A, Halilović-Alihodžić M, Vanwieren AR, Smajkan A, Karić A, Djedović H, Šutković J. A review on drug repurposing in COVID-19: from antiviral drugs to herbal alternatives. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 2022; 20:78. [PMID: 35608704 PMCID: PMC9127474 DOI: 10.1186/s43141-022-00353-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background COVID-19 is an illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Due to its rapid spread, in March 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) declared pandemic. Since the outbreak of pandemic many governments, scientists, and institutions started to work on new vaccines and finding of new and repurposing drugs. Main body of the abstract Drug repurposing is an excellent option for discovery of already used drugs, effective against COVID-19, lowering the cost of production, and shortening the period of delivery, especially when preclinical safety studies have already been performed. There are many approved drugs that showed significant results against COVID-19, like ivermectin and hydrochloroquine, including alternative treatment options against COVID-19, utilizing herbal medicine. Short conclusion This article summarized 11 repurposing drugs, their positive and negative health implications, along with traditional herbal alternatives, that harvest strong potential in efficient treatments options against COVID-19, with small or no significant side effects. Out of 11 repurposing drugs, four drugs are in status of emergency approval, most of them being in phase IV clinical trials. The first repurposing drug approved for clinical usage is remdesivir, whereas chloroquine and hydrochloroquine approval for emergency use was revoked by FDA for COVID-19 treatment in June 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abas Sezer
- Genetics and Bioengineering, International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | | | - Annissa Rachel Vanwieren
- Genetics and Bioengineering, International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Adna Smajkan
- Fakultät Chemie und Pharmazie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Amina Karić
- Genetics and Bioengineering, International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Husein Djedović
- Genetics and Bioengineering, International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Jasmin Šutković
- Genetics and Bioengineering, International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lu LY, Feng PH, Yu MS, Chen MC, Lin AJH, Chen JL, Yu LHL. Current utilization of interferon alpha for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019: A comprehensive review. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2022; 63:34-43. [PMID: 35115233 PMCID: PMC8755267 DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies have identified an association between perturbed type I interferon (IFN) responses and the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). IFNα intervention may normalize the dysregulated innate immunity of COVID-19. However, details regarding its utilization and therapeutic evidence have yet to be systematically evaluated. The aim of this comprehensive review was to summarize the current utilization of IFNα for COVID-19 treatment and to explore the evidence on safety and efficacy. A comprehensive review of clinical studies in the literature prior to December 1st, 2021, was performed to identify the current utilization of IFNα, which included details on the route of administration, the number of patients who received the treatment, the severity at the initiation of treatment, age range, the time from the onset of symptoms to treatment, dose, frequency, and duration as well as safety and efficacy. Encouragingly, no evidence was found against the safety of IFNα treatment for COVID-19. Early intervention, either within five days from the onset of symptoms or at hospital admission, confers better clinical outcomes, whereas late intervention may result in prolonged hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling-Ying Lu
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, No.386, Dazhong 1st Rd., Zuoying District, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Hao Feng
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No. 291, Zhongzheng Rd, Zhonghe District, New Taipei City, Taiwan,Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, No. 250, Wuxing Street, Xinyi District, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Sun Yu
- Division of Hematology, Conde S. Januário Hospital, Estrada do Visconde de São Januário, Macau, China
| | - Min-Chi Chen
- Graduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Alex Jia-Hong Lin
- Medical Affairs Department, Panco Healthcare Co., Ltd., a PharmaEssentia Company, 2F-5 No. 3 Park Street, Nangang District, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Justin L. Chen
- Medical Affairs Department, Panco Healthcare Co., Ltd., a PharmaEssentia Company, 2F-5 No. 3 Park Street, Nangang District, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Lennex Hsueh-Lin Yu
- Medical Affairs Department, Panco Healthcare Co., Ltd., a PharmaEssentia Company, 2F-5 No. 3 Park Street, Nangang District, Taipei, Taiwan,Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|