Comparing the diagnostic performance of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus with QFT-GIT, T-SPOT.TB and TST: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Performance of the T-SPOT.TB test in patients with indeterminate QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus results: proposal for an algorithm for the diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection

Latent Tuberculosis Infection (LTBI) is a state of persistent immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens without clinical, radiological and microbiological signs of active disease. Effective diagnosis and preventive treatment of LTBI are crucial for tuberculosis (TB) control, especially in high-risk groups. Currently, two main tests are used for LTBI diagnosis: the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST) and the Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRA), including the QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) and the T-SPOT.TB. Our study evaluated the performance of the T-SPOT.TB test in patients with indeterminate QFT-Plus results, using data from the Clinical Microbiology and Virology Laboratory (M&V) of Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital in Bergamo, Italy. Blood samples from patients tested for LTBI with QFT-Plus from January 1, 2017 to May 15, 2024 were analyzed. The QFT-Plus is the most widely used test in routine diagnostics for LTBI screening due to the availability of automated systems. Out of 20,995 samples tested with QFT-Plus, 576 (2.7%) gave indeterminate results. In all cases of indeterminate QFT-Plus results, M&V recommends performing the T-SPOT.TB test. However, of the 576 patients who obtained an indeterminate outcome, only 137 (23.8%) followed the indication. The T-SPOT.TB provided a definitive result in 87.6% of the cases, resolving 120 (80 negative and 40 positive) of 137 indeterminate QFT-Plus outcomes. Specifically, 78 of 92 cases, equal to 84.8%, were settled when the T-SPOT. TB test was performed within 30 days of the QFT-Plus. The T-SPOT.TB test has shown potential effectiveness in addressing indeterminate QFT-Plus results (84.8% resolution), indicating its possible role as a complementary diagnostic tool for LTBI. The proposed algorithm for LTBI screening is based on national and international guidelines recommending the use of the TST and/or an IGRA test for individuals at risk. However, it particularly emphasizes the use of QFT-Plus, due to its practicality and rapid execution, while recommending the addition of the T-SPOT.TB within 30 days in cases of indeterminate QFT-Plus results. Nevertheless, the conclusions should be regarded as preliminary and require confirmation through larger or controlled studies.

Analysis of Indeterminate QuantiFERON Assay Results in Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Proposed Management Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Identification and treatment of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) mitigate the risk of tuberculosis (TB) reactivation after transplantation. TB reactivation is higher in those with indeterminate QuantiFERON (QFT) than those with negative results. Management of indeterminate QFT results in the pretransplant period remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, 18 y and older, who were screened with QFT assay pretransplantation at Mayo Clinic between January 2010 and June 2023. We examined the frequency of indeterminate QFT results, results of repeat LTBI screening, treatment decisions, and rate of posttransplant TB infection.

RESULTS

Of 13 008 patients screened for LTBI before SOT, 736 (6%) patients had indeterminate QFT results. Among these, 247 (34%) underwent a second LTBI screening test, and 39 (5%) received LTBI treatment. Among 247 patients with a repeat LTBI screening test, 185 (75%), 48 (19%), and 14 (6%) were tested by QFT, T-SPOT.TB, or TST, respectively. The repeat QFT remained indeterminate in 160 (86%) patients, whereas all T-SPOT.TB results were negative. Posttransplant TB infection occurred in 2 (0.3%) patients; neither had a second TB screening test pretransplant nor received LTBI treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In SOT recipients with indeterminate QFT results at pretransplant evaluation, opting for T-SPOT.TB as a second test may be preferable over repeat QFT. TB infection after transplantation in patients with a pretransplant indeterminate QFT result was rare. Patient management and LTBI treatment in those with indeterminate QFT pretransplant should account for epidemiological risk factors, and shared decision-making is recommended.

Cost-effectiveness and health impact of screening and treatment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among formerly incarcerated individuals in Brazil: a Markov modelling study

BACKGROUND

Individuals who were formerly incarcerated have high tuberculosis incidence, but are generally not considered among the risk groups eligible for tuberculosis prevention. We investigated the potential health impact and cost-effectiveness of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection screening and tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) for individuals who were formerly incarcerated in Brazil.

METHODS

Using published evidence for Brazil, we constructed a Markov state transition model estimating tuberculosis-related health outcomes and costs among individuals who were formerly incarcerated, by simulating transitions between health states over time. The analysis compared tuberculosis infection screening and TPT, to no screening, considering a combination of M tuberculosis infection tests and TPT regimens. We quantified health effects as reductions in tuberculosis cases, tuberculosis deaths, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). We assessed costs from a tuberculosis programme perspective. We report intervention cost-effectiveness as the incremental costs per DALY averted, and tested how results changed across subgroups of the target population.

FINDINGS

Compared with no intervention, an intervention incorporating tuberculin skin testing and treatment with 3 months of isoniazid and rifapentine would avert 31 (95% uncertainty interval 14-56) lifetime tuberculosis cases and 4·1 (1·4-5·8) lifetime tuberculosis deaths per 1000 individuals, and cost US$242 per DALY averted. All test and regimen combinations were cost-effective compared with no screening. Younger age, longer incarceration, and more recent prison release were each associated with significantly greater health benefits and more favourable cost-effectiveness ratios, although the intervention was cost-effective for all subgroups examined.

INTERPRETATION

M tuberculosis infection screening and TPT for individuals who were formerly incarcerated appears cost-effective, and would provide valuable health gains.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health.

TRANSLATION

For the Portuguese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in healthcare workers in Latin America and the Caribbean: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Tuberculosis remains a significant global health concern, and healthcare workers (HCWs) face a high risk of acquiring latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) through occupational exposure. In the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region, where the burden of tuberculosis is substantial, understanding the prevalence of LTBI among HCWs is crucial for effective infection control measures. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of LTBI among HCWs in LAC countries.

Methods

Our search included MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, focusing on relevant English-language records. We looked for observational studies from inception until December 2023.

Results

Our analysis included 38 studies representing 15,236 HCWs and 6,728 LTBI cases. These studies spanned the period from 1994 to 2023 and were conducted in Brazil, Peru, Cuba, Colombia, Trinidad and Tobago, Mexico, and Chile. The mean prevalence of LTBI among HCWs was 35.32% (range 17.86-56.00%) for interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) and 43.67% (range 6.68-70.29%) for tuberculin skin test (TST). The pooled prevalence of LTBI among HCWs was 34.5% (95% CI 25.4-44.1%) for IGRA and 43.0% (95% CI 35.5-50.7%) for TST. When considering both IGRA and TST tests, the overall prevalence of LTBI among HCWs was 40.98% (95% CI 34.77-47.33%). LTBI was associated with longer lengths of employment and exposure to patients, family members, or any person with TB. Additionally, older HCWs faced a higher risk of LTBI. Specific professional roles (such as nurses, nurse technicians, or physicians), smoking, and deficient TB infection control measures increased the likelihood of LTBI. However, information regarding gender and BCG vaccination status showed discordance among studies.

Conclusion

Our findings underscore a substantial burden of LTBI among HCWs in LAC countries. Implementing adequate infection control measures is essential to prevent and control transmission within healthcare settings.

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Result Features in the Detection of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Thai Healthcare Workers Using QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus

Introduction Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) is an enormous reservoir for tuberculosis (TB), and healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk for TB infection. QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT-Plus) is an alternative to the tuberculin skin test for LTBI detection, but data on its application and LTBI detected by QFT-Plus in high TB burden countries are limited. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of LTBI and its risk factors, and to investigate the QFT-Plus results in Thai HCWs. Methods A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among HCWs at a secondary care hospital in Health Region 5, Thailand. Eligible HCWs were enrolled and underwent QFT-Plus testing. Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) values in tubes were analysed. The prevalence and associated risk factors for LTBI were assessed based on laboratory and sociodemographic data. Logistic regression analyses were applied to calculate odds ratios (OR, aOR) reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Of the 269 participants enrolled, their median age was 42 years and 93.31% (n = 251/269) were female. The majority (n = 178/269, 66.17%) were nurses or nurse assistants and 42.75% (n = 115/269) worked in the inpatient medical wards. Overall, the QFT-Plus results showed 110 (40.89%) positive with good agreement (93.68%; κ 0.87) and high correlation (Spearman's ρ 0.91) of IFN-γ concentrations in the two antigen tubes. A true difference in IFN-γ values for predicting a recent infection was found about 7.81% (n = 21/269). By univariate and multivariate analyses, the participants' age > 40 years (OR = 3.21, 95% CI: 1.84-5.64%; aOR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.07-3.96%), and employment duration > 10 years (OR = 3.19, 95% CI: 1.66-6.37%; aOR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.05-5.21%) were significantly associated with the increased risk of LTBI (p-value < 0.05). Conclusions The prevalence of LTBI among these HCWs was high, and the increased risk factors for LTBI according to QFT-Plus positivity were age over 40 years and working time in the hospital for more than 10 years. It is important to screen HCWs in this setting for LTBI, particularly those with long employment durations and older ages. The high prevalence of LTBI suggests that LTBI management, such as regular screening and treatment, should be considered together with strengthening preventive measures, especially in high-risk groups.

Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in health-care workers: a cross-sectional study at a northern Peruvian hospital

Background

Healthcare workers (HCWs) have a higher risk of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active tuberculosis than the general population. In HCWs, the risk of tuberculosis infection depends on the local tuberculosis prevalence, HCWs' characteristics, the healthcare facility, and prevention and control measures. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and risk factors for LTBI in HCWs at a northern Peruvian hospital.

Methods

This study had two phases: (1) a cross-sectional phase involving recruitment, history taking, and sampling for the Interferon-Gamma Release Assays (IGRA test), and (2) a prospective follow-up of IGRA-positive participants. We enrolled direct and non-direct patient caregivers among HCWs. We defined an LTBI case if the IGRA test was positive and clinical, laboratory, and radiological evaluations for active tuberculosis were negative.

Results

We recruited 308 participants between November 2022 and May 2023. The mean age was 38.6 ± 8.3 years. Over 75% of the participants were female. The most common job category was technicians (30.5%), physicians (22.7%), nurses (20.5%), and other HCWs groups (17.5%). Most participants worked in hospital wards (28.2%), diagnostics departments (16.9%), and critical care departments (15.6%). The LTBI prevalence among HCWs was 17.86% (95% CI 13.84-22.70). In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for age, time working in our hospital, and family history of tuberculosis, males had a higher risk of LTBI (aPR 1.69, 95% CI 1.01-2.77) than females. Working for more than 10 years increased the risk of LBTI (aPR 2.4, 95% CI 1.44-3.97) compared to working for ≤10 years. Even further, participants who had worked for more than 20 years had an aPR of 4.31 (95% CI 1.09-13.65) compared to those with ≤10 years. Similarly, occupational exposure increased the risk of LTBI (aPR 2.21, 95% CI 1.27-4.08) compared to those HCWs not occupationally exposed.

Conclusion

The LTBI prevalence in HCWs at a northern Peruvian hospital was lower compared to other Peruvian cities. Males, more experienced, and occupational exposed HCWs are at higher risk of LTBI. LTBI prevalence in Peruvian HCWs is still high. More studies are needed to address some aspects this study has not examined.

Accuracy of QuantiFERON in active tuberculosis suspects with comorbidities and nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in Northern California

The QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT) is routinely utilized in North American health systems to detect a cellular immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The sensitivity of QFT in tuberculosis (TB) patients with comorbidities is not well established and the specificity of QFT in patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections is incompletely understood. Between 2012 and 2023, all patients with culture-positive TB and patients with NTM infection per the expert diagnostic guidelines or biopsy-proven NTM infection who had a concurrent QFT test were included in this study. The sensitivity and specificity of QFT were measured in TB and NTM patients, respectively. In 109 patients with active TB, the overall sensitivity of QFT was 78.0% (85/109; 95% CI: 70.1, 85.7). The sensitivity was 86.0% (49/57; 95% CI: 76.6, 94.8) and 69.2% (36/52; 95% CI: 56.7, 81.8) in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients, respectively. The overall specificity of QFT in 88 patients with NTM infection was 76.1% (67/88; 95% CI: 67.2, 85.0). After the exclusion of 17 NTM patients with risk factors for latent TB infection, the specificity was 94.4% (67/71; 95% CI: 89.1, 99.7). Two patients had NTM species known to cross-react with QFT. In two NTM patients infected with species (Mycobacterium intracellulare subsp. intracellulare and Mycobacterium intracellulare subsp. chimaera) not known to cross-react, whole genome sequencing did not detect ESAT-6 or CFP-10. In Northern California, the QFT assay demonstrated moderately low to moderately high sensitivity in TB patients and very high specificity in NTM patients, thus ruling out concerns for cross-reactivity with NTM.

[Recommendations for Contact Tracing for Tuberculosis - Update 2023]

The aim of contact tracing for tuberculosis is in addition to active case finding the detection of chains of infection and the prevention of the further spread of the disease. In this context, a careful selection of contact persons is necessary, depending on the type and duration of contact, to identify persons who are recently infected and therefore to increase the benefit of a preventive therapy and to avoid unnecessary testing of persons who are not at risk of infection. Since the last update of the recommendations on contact tracing, data on the use of interferon-y release assays (IGRAs) in children has been improved markedly. These are the preferred test in contact tracing of adults. For children, both IGRAs and the tuberculin skin test can be used equivalently. Rifampicin for 4 months, rifampicin and isoniazid for 3 months, or isoniazid for 9 months are recommended as preventive therapy in cases of confirmed infection.The implementation of the contact tracing in different age groups as well as legal framework conditions and socio-medical aspects and challenges are dealt with in detail. In addition, special cases, such as environmental screening in day-care centers, schools, or other community facilities, are discussed separately.

[Recommendations for contact tracing for tuberculosis - update 2023]

The aim of contact tracing for tuberculosis is in addition to active case finding the detection of chains of infection and the prevention of the further spread of the disease. In this context, a careful selection of contact persons is necessary, depending on the type and duration of contact, to identify persons who are recently infected and therefore to increase the benefit of a preventive therapy and to avoid unnecessary testing of persons who are not at risk of infection. Since the last update of the recommendations on contact tracing, data on the use of interferon-y release assays (IGRAs) in children has been improved markedly. These are the preferred test in contact tracing of adults. For children, both IGRAs and the tuberculin skin test can be used equivalently. Rifampicin for 4 months, rifampicin and isoniazid for 3 months, or isoniazid for 9 months are recommended as preventive therapy in cases of confirmed infection.The implementation of the contact tracing in different age groups as well as legal framework conditions and socio-medical aspects and challenges are dealt with in detail. In addition, special cases, such as environmental screening in day-care centers, schools, or other community facilities, are discussed separately.