Combining weakly and strongly supervised learning improves strong supervision in Gleason pattern classification

A systematic comparison of deep learning methods for Gleason grading and scoring

Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer in men worldwide after lung cancer. Its diagnosis is based on the identification of the Gleason score that evaluates the abnormality of cells in glands through the analysis of the different Gleason patterns within tissue samples. The recent advancements in computational pathology, a domain aiming at developing algorithms to automatically analyze digitized histopathology images, lead to a large variety and availability of datasets and algorithms for Gleason grading and scoring. However, there is no clear consensus on which methods are best suited for each problem in relation to the characteristics of data and labels. This paper provides a systematic comparison on nine datasets with state-of-the-art training approaches for deep neural networks (including fully-supervised learning, weakly-supervised learning, semi-supervised learning, Additive-MIL, Attention-Based MIL, Dual-Stream MIL, TransMIL and CLAM) applied to Gleason grading and scoring tasks. The nine datasets are collected from pathology institutes and openly accessible repositories. The results show that the best methods for Gleason grading and Gleason scoring tasks are fully supervised learning and CLAM, respectively, guiding researchers to the best practice to adopt depending on the task to solve and the labels that are available.

Don't Fear the Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning for Prostate Cancer Detection in Pathology

CONTEXT

Automated prostate cancer detection using machine learning technology has led to speculation that pathologists will soon be replaced by algorithms. This review covers the development of machine learning algorithms and their reported effectiveness specific to prostate cancer detection and Gleason grading.

OBJECTIVE

To examine current algorithms regarding their accuracy and classification abilities. We provide a general explanation of the technology and how it is being used in clinical practice. The challenges to the application of machine learning algorithms in clinical practice are also discussed.

DATA SOURCES

The literature for this review was identified and collected using a systematic search. Criteria were established prior to the sorting process to effectively direct the selection of studies. A 4-point system was implemented to rank the papers according to their relevancy. For papers accepted as relevant to our metrics, all cited and citing studies were also reviewed. Studies were then categorized based on whether they implemented binary or multi-class classification methods. Data were extracted from papers that contained accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), or κ values in the context of prostate cancer detection. The results were visually summarized to present accuracy trends between classification abilities.

CONCLUSIONS

It is more difficult to achieve high accuracy metrics for multiclassification tasks than for binary tasks. The clinical implementation of an algorithm that can assign a Gleason grade to clinical whole slide images (WSIs) remains elusive. Machine learning technology is currently not able to replace pathologists but can serve as an important safeguard against misdiagnosis.

Harnessing artificial intelligence for prostate cancer management

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a common malignancy in males. The pathology review of PCa is crucial for clinical decision-making, but traditional pathology review is labor intensive and subjective to some extent. Digital pathology and whole-slide imaging enable the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in pathology. This review highlights the success of AI in detecting and grading PCa, predicting patient outcomes, and identifying molecular subtypes. We propose that AI-based methods could collaborate with pathologists to reduce workload and assist clinicians in formulating treatment recommendations. We also introduce the general process and challenges in developing AI pathology models for PCa. Importantly, we summarize publicly available datasets and open-source codes to facilitate the utilization of existing data and the comparison of the performance of different models to improve future studies.

Glioma subtype classification from histopathological images using in-domain and out-of-domain transfer learning: An experimental study

We provide in this paper a comprehensive comparison of various transfer learning strategies and deep learning architectures for computer-aided classification of adult-type diffuse gliomas. We evaluate the generalizability of out-of-domain ImageNet representations for a target domain of histopathological images, and study the impact of in-domain adaptation using self-supervised and multi-task learning approaches for pretraining the models using the medium-to-large scale datasets of histopathological images. A semi-supervised learning approach is furthermore proposed, where the fine-tuned models are utilized to predict the labels of unannotated regions of the whole slide images (WSI). The models are subsequently retrained using the ground-truth labels and weak labels determined in the previous step, providing superior performance in comparison to standard in-domain transfer learning with balanced accuracy of 96.91% and F1-score 97.07%, and minimizing the pathologist's efforts for annotation. Finally, we provide a visualization tool working at WSI level which generates heatmaps that highlight tumor areas; thus, providing insights to pathologists concerning the most informative parts of the WSI.

Deep Learning Methodologies Applied to Digital Pathology in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review

Deep learning (DL), often called artificial intelligence (AI), has been increasingly used in Pathology thanks to the use of scanners to digitize slides which allow us to visualize them on monitors and process them with AI algorithms. Many articles have focused on DL applied to prostate cancer (PCa). This systematic review explains the DL applications and their performances for PCa in digital pathology. Article research was performed using PubMed and Embase to collect relevant articles. A Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed with an adaptation of the QUADAS-2 tool. Out of the 77 included studies, eight focused on pre-processing tasks such as quality assessment or staining normalization. Most articles (n = 53) focused on diagnosis tasks like cancer detection or Gleason grading. Fifteen articles focused on prediction tasks, such as recurrence prediction or genomic correlations. Best performances were reached for cancer detection with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) up to 0.99 with algorithms already available for routine diagnosis. A few biases outlined by the RoB analysis are often found in these articles, such as the lack of external validation. This review was registered on PROSPERO under CRD42023418661.

Automated LVO detection and collateral scoring on CTA using a 3D self-configuring object detection network: a multi-center study

The use of deep learning (DL) techniques for automated diagnosis of large vessel occlusion (LVO) and collateral scoring on computed tomography angiography (CTA) is gaining attention. In this study, a state-of-the-art self-configuring object detection network called nnDetection was used to detect LVO and assess collateralization on CTA scans using a multi-task 3D object detection approach. The model was trained on single-phase CTA scans of 2425 patients at five centers, and its performance was evaluated on an external test set of 345 patients from another center. Ground-truth labels for the presence of LVO and collateral scores were provided by three radiologists. The nnDetection model achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 98.26% (95% CI 96.25-99.36%) in identifying LVO, correctly classifying 339 out of 345 CTA scans in the external test set. The DL-based collateral scores had a kappa of 0.80, indicating good agreement with the consensus of the radiologists. These results demonstrate that the self-configuring 3D nnDetection model can accurately detect LVO on single-phase CTA scans and provide semi-quantitative collateral scores, offering a comprehensive approach for automated stroke diagnostics in patients with LVO.

Inference of core needle biopsy whole slide images requiring definitive therapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is often a slowly progressive indolent disease. Unnecessary treatments from overdiagnosis are a significant concern, particularly low-grade disease. Active surveillance has being considered as a risk management strategy to avoid potential side effects by unnecessary radical treatment. In 2016, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) endorsed the Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Clinical Practice Guideline on active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Based on this guideline, we developed a deep learning model to classify prostate adenocarcinoma into indolent (applicable for active surveillance) and aggressive (necessary for definitive therapy) on core needle biopsy whole slide images (WSIs). In this study, we trained deep learning models using a combination of transfer, weakly supervised, and fully supervised learning approaches using a dataset of core needle biopsy WSIs (n=1300). In addition, we performed an inter-rater reliability evaluation on the WSI classification.

RESULTS

We evaluated the models on a test set (n=645), achieving ROC-AUCs of 0.846 for indolent and 0.980 for aggressive. The inter-rater reliability evaluation showed s-scores in the range of 0.10 to 0.95, with the lowest being on the WSIs with both indolent and aggressive classification by the model, and the highest on benign WSIs.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate the promising potential of deployment in a practical prostate adenocarcinoma histopathological diagnostic workflow system.

A deep learning network for Gleason grading of prostate biopsies using EfficientNet

Objectives

The most crucial part in the diagnosis of cancer is severity grading. Gleason’s score is a widely used grading system for prostate cancer. Manual examination of the microscopic images and grading them is tiresome and consumes a lot of time. Hence to automate the Gleason grading process, a novel deep learning network is proposed in this work.

Methods

In this work, a deep learning network for Gleason grading of prostate cancer is proposed based on EfficientNet architecture. It applies a compound scaling method to balance the dimensions of the underlying network. Also, an additional attention branch is added to EfficientNet-B7 for precise feature weighting.

Result

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that integrates an additional attention branch with EfficientNet architecture for Gleason grading. The proposed models were trained using H&E-stained samples from prostate cancer Tissue Microarrays (TMAs) in the Harvard Dataverse dataset.

Conclusions

The proposed network was able to outperform the existing methods and it achieved an Kappa score of 0.5775.

A Deep Learning Model for Prostate Adenocarcinoma Classification in Needle Biopsy Whole-Slide Images Using Transfer Learning

The histopathological diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma in needle biopsy specimens is of pivotal importance for determining optimum prostate cancer treatment. Since diagnosing a large number of cases containing 12 core biopsy specimens by pathologists using a microscope is time-consuming manual system and limited in terms of human resources, it is necessary to develop new techniques that can rapidly and accurately screen large numbers of histopathological prostate needle biopsy specimens. Computational pathology applications that can assist pathologists in detecting and classifying prostate adenocarcinoma from whole-slide images (WSIs) would be of great benefit for routine pathological practice. In this paper, we trained deep learning models capable of classifying needle biopsy WSIs into adenocarcinoma and benign (non-neoplastic) lesions. We evaluated the models on needle biopsy, transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) public dataset test sets, achieving an ROC-AUC up to 0.978 in needle biopsy test sets and up to 0.9873 in TCGA test sets for adenocarcinoma.

Semi-supervised training of deep convolutional neural networks with heterogeneous data and few local annotations: An experiment on prostate histopathology image classification

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are state-of-the-art computer vision techniques for various tasks, particularly for image classification. However, there are domains where the training of classification models that generalize on several datasets is still an open challenge because of the highly heterogeneous data and the lack of large datasets with local annotations of the regions of interest, such as histopathology image analysis. Histopathology concerns the microscopic analysis of tissue specimens processed in glass slides to identify diseases such as cancer. Digital pathology concerns the acquisition, management and automatic analysis of digitized histopathology images that are large, having in the order of 100^'000² pixels per image. Digital histopathology images are highly heterogeneous due to the variability of the image acquisition procedures. Creating locally labeled regions (required for the training) is time-consuming and often expensive in the medical field, as physicians usually have to annotate the data. Despite the advances in deep learning, leveraging strongly and weakly annotated datasets to train classification models is still an unsolved problem, mainly when data are very heterogeneous. Large amounts of data are needed to create models that generalize well. This paper presents a novel approach to train CNNs that generalize to heterogeneous datasets originating from various sources and without local annotations. The data analysis pipeline targets Gleason grading on prostate images and includes two models in sequence, following a teacher/student training paradigm. The teacher model (a high-capacity neural network) automatically annotates a set of pseudo-labeled patches used to train the student model (a smaller network). The two models are trained with two different teacher/student approaches: semi-supervised learning and semi-weekly supervised learning. For each of the two approaches, three student training variants are presented. The baseline is provided by training the student model only with the strongly annotated data. Classification performance is evaluated on the student model at the patch level (using the local annotations of the Tissue Micro-Arrays Zurich dataset) and at the global level (using the TCGA-PRAD, The Cancer Genome Atlas-PRostate ADenocarcinoma, whole slide image Gleason score). The teacher/student paradigm allows the models to better generalize on both datasets, despite the inter-dataset heterogeneity and the small number of local annotations used. The classification performance is improved both at the patch-level (up to κ=0.6127±0.0133 from κ=0.5667±0.0285), at the TMA core-level (Gleason score) (up to κ=0.7645±0.0231 from κ=0.7186±0.0306) and at the WSI-level (Gleason score) (up to κ=0.4529±0.0512 from κ=0.2293±0.1350). The results show that with the teacher/student paradigm, it is possible to train models that generalize on datasets from entirely different sources, despite the inter-dataset heterogeneity and the lack of large datasets with local annotations.