Dynamics of cinacalcet use and biochemical control in hemodialysis patients: a retrospective New-user cohort design

Etelcalcetide Versus Cinacalcet in Hemodialysis Patients in the United States: A Facility Calcimimetic Approach to Assess Real-World Effectiveness

Rationale & Objective

Some US hemodialysis (HD) facilities switched from oral cinacalcet to intravenous etelcalcetide as the primary calcimimetic therapy to control parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels after the introduction of etelcalcetide in 2017. Although clinical trials have demonstrated the superior efficacy of etelcalcetide versus cinacalcet, evidence comparing real-world effectiveness is lacking.

Study Design

Prospective cohort.

Setting & Participants

Patients receiving HD enrolled in US Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study facilities.

Exposure

We classified HD facilities on the basis of whether >75% of calcimimetic users were prescribed etelcalcetide (“etelcalcetide-first”) or cinacalcet (“cinacalcet-first”) from March-August 2019.

Outcomes

PTH, calcium, and phosphorus levels among calcimimetic users, all averaged in the 6 months after the exposure assessment period.

Analytical Approach

We used adjusted linear regression to compare outcomes using 2 approaches: (1) cross-sectional comparison of etelcalcetide-first and cinacalcet-first HD facilities; (2) pre-post comparison of HD facilities that switched from cinacalcet-first to etelcalcetide-first using facilities that remained cinacalcet-first as a comparison group.

Results

We identified 45 etelcalcetide-first and 67 cinacalcet-first HD facilities; etelcalcetide-first (vs cinacalcet-first) facilities were more likely to be from small or independent dialysis organizations (86% vs 22%) and had higher total calcimimetic use (43% vs 29%) and lower active vitamin D use (66% vs 82%). In the cross-sectional analysis comparing etelcalcetide-first and cinacalcet-first HD facilities, the adjusted mean difference in PTH levels was −115 pg/mL (95% CI, −196 to −34) and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL was lower (prevalence difference, −11.4%; 95% CI, −19.3% to −3.5%). Among facilities that switched to etelcalcetide-first, the mean PTH level decreased from 671 to 484 pg/mL and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL decreased from 39% to 21%. Among facilities that remained cinacalcet-first, the mean PTH level increased from 632 to 698 pg/mL and the prevalence of a PTH level of >600 pg/mL increased from 37% to 43%. The adjusted difference-in-difference between the switch to etelcalcetide-first and the continuation of cinacalcet-first was −169 pg/mL (−249 to −90 pg/mL) for the mean PTH and −14.4% (−22.0% to −6.8%) for a PTH level of >600 pg/mL. We also observed slightly lower serum calcium levels and minimal differences in serum phosphorus levels between the etelcalcetide-first and the cinacalcet-first facilities.

Limitations

Residual confounding.

Conclusions

We observed better PTH control in HD facilities that switched from using cinacalcet to etelcalcetide as the primary calcimimetic therapy. Further research is needed to investigate how the greater real-world effectiveness of intravenous etelcalcetide (vs oral cinacalcet) may affect clinical outcomes.

Prevalence and risk factors for tertiary hyperparathyroidism in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Tertiary hyperparathyroidism after kidney transplantation has been associated with graft dysfunction, cardiovascular morbidity, and osteopenia; however, its true prevalence is unclear. The objective of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of and risk factors for tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 849 adult kidney transplantation recipients (December 2008-February 2020) was used to estimate the prevalence of hyperparathyroidism 1-year post-kidney transplant. Tertiary hyperparathyroidism was defined as hypercalcemia (≥10mg/dL) and hyperparathyroidism (parathyroid hormone≥70pg/mL) 1-year post-kidney transplantation. Modified Poisson regression models were used to evaluate risk factors associated with the development of both persistent hyperparathyroidism and tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

RESULTS

Among kidney transplantation recipients, 524 (61.7%) had persistent hyperparathyroidism and 182 (21.5%) had tertiary hyperparathyroidism at 1-year post-kidney transplantation. Calcimimetic use before kidney transplantation was associated with 1.30-fold higher risk of persistent hyperparathyroidism (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.12-1.51) and 1.84-fold higher risk of tertiary hyperparathyroidism (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.25-2.72). Pre-kidney transplantation parathyroid hormone ≥300 pg/mL was associated with 1.49-fold higher risk of persistent hyperparathyroidism (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.19-1.85) and 2.21-fold higher risk of tertiary hyperparathyroidism (adjusted prevalence ratio = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.25-3.90). Pre-kidney transplantation tertiary hyperparathyroidism was associated with an increased risk of post-kidney transplantation tertiary hyperparathyroidism (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.29-2.27), but not persistent hyperparathyroidism. Furthermore, 73.0% of patients with persistent hyperparathyroidism and 61.5% with tertiary hyperparathyroidism did not receive any treatment at 1-year post-kidney transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Persistent hyperparathyroidism affected 61.7% and tertiary hyperparathyroidism affected 21.5% of kidney transplantation recipients; however, the majority of patients were not treated. Pre-kidney transplantation parathyroid hormone levels ≥300pg/mL and the use of calcimimetics are associated with the development of tertiary hyperparathyroidism. These findings encourage the re-evaluation of recommended pre-kidney transplantation parathyroid hormone thresholds and reconsideration of pre-kidney transplantation secondary hyperparathyroidism treatments to avoid the adverse sequelae of tertiary hyperparathyroidism in kidney transplantation recipients.

Cinacalcet and gastrointestinal bleeding risk in patients receiving hemodialysis

PURPOSE

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is common among dialysis patients, and calcimimetics are a mainstay of treatment. This study assessed whether cinacalcet use is associated with gastrointestinal bleeding in a large hemodialysis cohort.

METHODS

A linked database of clinical records and medical claims for patients receiving hemodialysis in a large dialysis organization, 2007-2010, was used. A nested case-control study was performed among patients aged ≥18 years who had received hemodialysis for ≥90 days, had Medicare Parts A, B, and D coverage for ≥1 year, and had clinical evidence of SHPT (parathyroid hormone >300 pg/mL). Cases were those who experienced death or hospitalization caused by gastrointestinal bleeding. Each case was matched to up to four controls. Exposure was measured by any cinacalcet use, current use, past use, cumulative exposure days, and cumulative dosage. Conditional logistic models were used to assess the association.

RESULTS

Of 48 437 patients included, 2570 experienced gastrointestinal bleeding events (2498 non-fatal, 72 fatal), and 2465 (2397 non-fatal, 68 fatal) were matched to 9500 controls; 17.2% of cases and 15.8% of controls had cinacalcet exposure and 11.1% of both cases and controls had current use. The adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) of gastrointestinal bleeding for any use, current use, and past use of cinacalcet were 1.04 (0.91-1.19), 0.97 (0.83-1.13), and 1.22 (0.99-1.50), respectively, with no use as the reference.

CONCLUSION

The results do not suggest an elevated risk of gastrointestinal bleeding resulting in hospitalization or death for hemodialysis patients exposed to cinacalcet.

Etelcalcetide Utilization, Dosing Titration, and Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disease (CKD-MBD) Marker Responses in US Hemodialysis Patients

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Clinical trial data have demonstrated the efficacy of etelcalcetide for reducing parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We provide a real-world summary of etelcalcetide utilization, dosing, effectiveness, and discontinuation since its US introduction in April 2017.

STUDY DESIGN

New-user design within prospective cohort.

SETTING PARTICIPANTS

2596 new users of etelcalcetide from April 2017 through August 2019 in a national sample of adult, chronic HD patients in the US Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).

PREDICTORS

Baseline PTH, prior cinacalcet use, initial etelcalcetide dose.

OUTCOME(S)

Trajectories of etelcalcetide dose, use of mineral bone disorder (MBD) medications, and levels of PTH, serum calcium, and phosphorus in the 12 months following etelcalcetide initiation.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Cumulative incidence methods for etelcalcetide discontinuation and linear generalized estimating equations for trajectory analyses.

RESULTS

By August 2019 etelcalcetide prescriptions increased to 6% of HD patients from their first use in April 2017. Starting etelcalcetide dose was 15 mg/week in 70% of patients and 7.5 mg/week in 27% of patients; 49% of new users were prescribed cinacalcet in the prior 3 months. Etelcalcetide discontinuation was 9%, 17%, and 27% by 3, 6, and 12 months post-initiation. One year after etelcalcetide initiation, mean PTH levels declined by 40%, from 948 to 566 pg/mL, and the proportion of patients with PTH within target (150-599 pg/mL) increased from 33% to 64% overall, from 0% to 60% among patients with baseline PTH ≥600 pg/mL, and from 30% to 63% among patients with prior cinacalcet use. The proportion of patients with serum phosphorus >5.5 mg/dL decreased from 55% to 45%, while the prevalence of albumin-corrected serum calcium <7.5 mg/dL remained at 1%-2%. Use of active vitamin D (from 77% to 87%) and Ca-based phosphate binders (from 41% to 50%) increased in the 12 months following etelcalcetide initiation.

LIMITATIONS

Data unavailable for provider dosing protocols, dose holds, or reasons for discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

In the 12 months following etelcalcetide initiation, patients had large and sustained reductions in PTH levels. These results support the utility of etelcalcetide as an effective therapy to achieve the KDIGO recommended guidelines for CKD-MBD markers in HD patients.

Effects of Social Disparities on Management and Surgical Outcomes for Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

INTRODUCTION

Nearly 80% of chronic renal failure patients have secondary hyperparathyroidism. Cinacalcet is used to lower parathyroid hormone; however, it is expensive and has side effects. When secondary hyperparathyroidism is resistant to medication or medications are inaccessible, parathyroidectomy is performed. Race and socioeconomic status influence access to care and surgical outcomes. We sought to evaluate the effect of race and socioeconomic status on parathyroidectomy rate as well as surgical outcomes of patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

METHODS

We undertook cross-sectional analysis of adults diagnosed with secondary hyperparathyroidism in the USA between 2012 and 2014, using the National Inpatient Sample. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine associations between social disparities, likelihood to undergo parathyroidectomy, and surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2014, a national estimate of 724,170 hospitalizations were identified where patients had a diagnosis of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Operative rate was 0.67%. By socioeconomic status, differences in rates of surgery in the poorest compared to the richest were not significant (0.74% vs. 0.55%, OR 1.08, p = 0.5). African-American patients had higher rates of parathyroidectomy compared to Caucasians (1 vs. 0.74%, OR 1.49, p < 0.001). African-American patients also had a trend toward more complications and greater length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

According to a large administrative dataset, parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism is seldom used in the USA. African-American patients have higher rates of surgical management. Surgical outcomes may be affected by race. Clinicians treating secondary hyperparathyroidism should be aware of existing disparities within their health system.

One-year safety and efficacy of intravenous etelcalcetide in patients on hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT), a common complication of chronic kidney disease, is characterized by elevated serum parathyroid hormone (PTH). Etelcalcetide is an intravenous calcimimetic that increases sensitivity of the calcium-sensing receptor to calcium and decreases PTH secretion. This open-label extension (OLE) trial evaluated the long-term effects of etelcalcetide for sHPT treatment in patients receiving hemodialysis.

METHODS

This 52-week, multicenter, single-arm OLE enrolled patients from three parent trials: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials and one open-label, single-arm, 'switch' study from cinacalcet to etelcalcetide. The primary endpoint was to investigate the nature, frequency, severity and relation to treatment of all adverse events (AEs) reported throughout the trial. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients with >30% reduction from baseline in PTH and the percentage change from baseline in PTH, albumin-corrected calcium (Ca), phosphate (P) and the calcium-phosphate product (Ca × P).ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01785875; Amgen study: 20120231.

RESULTS

Overall, 89.8% of the patients experienced one or more treatment-emergent AE. The most common were decreased blood Ca (43.3%), diarrhea (10.8%), vomiting (10.4%) and nausea (9.6%); symptomatic hypocalcemia occurred in 3.7% of the patients. Approximately 68% of patients achieved >30% reduction in PTH, and ∼56% achieved PTH ≤300 pg/mL. Mean percent changes from baseline ranged from -25.4% to -26.1% for PTH, -8.3% to -9.1% for Ca, -3.6% to -4.1% for P and -12.0% to -12.6% for Ca × P.

CONCLUSIONS

Etelcalcetide effectively lowered PTH and its effect was sustained, while no new safety concerns emerged over a 1-year treatment period.

Real World Use and Effects of Calcimimetics in Treating Mineral and Bone Disorder in Hemodialysis Patients

BACKGROUND

Calcimimetics are used to treat mineral and bone disorder by reducing parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium (Ca), and phosphorus (Phos). The study objectives were to assess the control of PTH, Ca, and Phos over time in patients receiving cinacalcet or etelcalcetide as well as dosing and time to discontinuation for etelcalcetide.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical records from small and independent dialysis centers. Adults ≥18 years of age were identified as cinacalcet or etelcalcetide users based on the first calcimimetic received in 2018 (index date). Patients were followed from the index date until parathyroidectomy, kidney transplant, death, or end of data (December 31, 2018). Analyses of mean PTH, Ca, and Phos, as well as target achievement of PTH, Ca, and Phos were conducted over a 9-month period. Discontinuation with etelcalcetide was measured with the Kaplan-Meier estimator.

RESULTS

There were 1,346 cinacalcet patients (mean age 60.5 years, 43.5% female, and 47.1% Black) and 1,255 etelcalcetide patients (mean age 63.4 years, 46.6% female, and 38.5% Black). At baseline, the proportions in target were similar for etelcalcetide versus cinacalcet: 36 versus 38% for PTH, 79 versus 80% for Ca, and 43 versus 44% for Phos. Overall, 40-47% of cinacalcet users and 48-62% of etelcalcetide users were observed to be in target for PTH over 9 months. The proportion in target for Phos ranged from 41 to 46% for cinacalcet and 46-51% for etelcalcetide. The proportion in target for Ca ranged from 74 to 78% for cinacalcet and 60-73% for etelcalcetide. Etelcalcetide 12-month discontinuation was 37.4%.

CONCLUSION

Both calcimimetics were effective in keeping PTH, Ca, and Phos levels within target. Patients receiving etelcalcetide tended to have lower laboratory values for PTH, Ca, and Phos over time, while patients receiving cinacalcet tended to be more likely to be in target for Ca over time.

The effectiveness of cinacalcet: a randomized, open label study in chronic hemodialysis patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism

Background: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is associated with high incidences of cardiovascular disease, bone fracture, and mortality. This study was conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of cinacalcet treatment on chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) markers in chronic hemodialysis patients with severe SHPT.

Methods: In phase 1, 30 adult HD patients were randomized to cinacalcet or control groups for 12 weeks to explore the achievement of >30% reduction of iPTH. In phase 2, 45 patients were participated to further explore the effect of cinacalcet on CKD-MBD parameters for 24-week follow up and 12 additional weeks after cinacalcet discontinuation.

Results: In phase 1, the baseline serum iPTH levels were not different [1374 (955, 1639) pg/mL in the control group vs. 1191 (1005, 1884) pg/mL in the cinacalcet group], the percentage of patients achieving iPTH target were significantly higher in the treatment group [80% vs. 13%, p = .001]. In phase 2, the significant reductions of iPTH, FGF-23, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b, and slightly decreased size of parathyroid gland and stabilized vascular calcification were observed at 24-week follow up and markedly rebounded after discontinuation of cinacalcet.

Conclusions: The effectiveness of cinacalcet were still obviously demonstrated even in chronic HD patients with severe SHPT. In addition, the improvements of bone markers and FGF-23, and stabilization of vascular calcification were observed. Therefore, cinacalcet can provide salutary effects on CKD-MBD in severe SHPT and might be an initially effective PTH-lowering therapy prior to surgical parathyroidectomy as well as an alternative treatment in the patients unsuitable for surgery.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02056730. Date of registration: February 4, 2014.

Predictors of cinacalcet discontinuation and reinitiation in hemodialysis patients: results from 7 European countries

Background

The putative benefits of cinacalcet therapy for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) are thought to be most manifested when patients are taking it consistently and as prescribed. Real-world descriptions of cinacalcet prescription discontinuation and reinitiation in European hemodialysis patients are lacking. To address this knowledge gap, we used Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) data, based on dialysis facility medical records, from seven European countries to estimate rates and predictors of cinacalcet prescription discontinuation and reinitiation in hemodialysis patients and to describe the trajectories of CKD-MBD laboratory values after discontinuation.

Methods

Cox regression analyses were used to predict (1) cinacalcet discontinuation among 613 patients with ≥3 consecutive months without cinacalcet prescription immediately prior to a new cinacalcet prescription and (2) cinacalcet reinitiation among 415 patients with a newly discontinued cinacalcet prescription immediately after ≥3 consecutive months of prescribed use.

Results

Cinacalcet was discontinued in 21 and 35% of new users after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Cinacalcet was reinitiated in 38 and 49% of newly-discontinued users after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Predictors of discontinuation included lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the previous month (< 150 pg/ml vs. 150–299, HR = 2.57 [95% CI: 1.52–4.33]) and lower serum calcium in the previous month (< 8.4 mg/dl vs. 8.4–10.19, HR = 1.67 [95% CI: 1.08–2.59]). Predictors of reinitiation included higher PTH in the previous month (300–599 pg/ml vs. 150–299, HR = 1.88 [95% CI = 1.19–2.97]; 600+ pg/ml, HR = 3.02 [95% CI = 1.92–4.76]). After cinacalcet discontinuation, mean serum PTH increased from 408 to 510 pg/ml, mean serum calcium briefly rose from 9.12 to 9.22 mg/dl before declining to 9.06 mg/dl, and mean serum phosphorus showed little change.

Conclusions

Nephrologist discontinuation of cinacalcet therapy is common in European countries. Additional research is needed to identify optimal cinacalcet treatment strategies for SHPT management, including comparisons of intermittent cinacalcet therapy versus sustained treatment with reduced dose or frequency.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1355-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Overview of the 2017 KDIGO CKD-MBD Update: Practice Implications for Adult Hemodialysis Patients

Renal dietitians play a pivotal role in the ongoing management of chronic kidney disease in patients on hemodialysis. Awareness of changes to clinical practice guidelines that may impact laboratory parameters associated with chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder is important for optimal patient care. In this article, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update recommendations related to the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in adults on hemodialysis are reviewed and treatment implications for renal dietitians discussed. Specific attention is given to the integration of updated recommendations such as the use of calcimimetics as part of a combination approach to the existing treatment paradigm. Renal dietitians can directly apply the updated clinical recommendations in the evaluation of diet composition; food additives; medication adherence challenges with phosphate binder type and use and serial monitoring of phosphorus, calcium, and parathyroid hormone levels to inform clinical decisions on treatment options for patients.

A Decision-Analytic Model to Assess the Cost-Effectiveness of Etelcalcetide vs. Cinacalcet

INTRODUCTION

Etelcalcetide is a novel intravenous calcimimetic for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in haemodialysis patients. The clinical efficacy and safety of etelcalcetide (in addition to phosphate binders and vitamin D and/or analogues [PB/VD]) was evaluated in three phase III studies, including two placebo-controlled trials and a head-to-head study versus the oral calcimimetic cinacalcet.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a decision-analytic model for economic evaluation of etelcalcetide compared with cinacalcet.

METHODS

We developed a life-time Markov model including potential treatment effects on mortality, cardiovascular events, fractures, and subjects' persistence. Long-term efficacy of etelcalcetide was extrapolated from the reduction in parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the phase III trials and the available data from the outcomes study in cinacalcet (EVOLVE trial). Etelcalcetide was compared with cinacalcet, both in addition to PB/VD. We applied unit costs averaged from five European countries and a range of potential etelcalcetide pricing options assuming parity price to weekly use of cinacalcet and varying it by a 15 or 30% increase.

RESULTS

Compared with cinacalcet, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of etelcalcetide was €1,355 per QALY, €24,521 per QALY, and €47,687 per QALY for the three prices explored. The results were robust across the probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our modelling approach enabled cost-utility assessment of the novel therapy for SHPT based on the observed and extrapolated data. This model can be used for local adaptations in the context of reimbursement assessment.

Exploring the potential value of improved care for secondary hyperparathyroidism with a novel calcimimetic therapy

AIMS

This study explored the use of a value-based pricing approach for the new calcimimetic etelcalcetide indicated for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in patients receiving hemodialysis. It used the US payer perspective and applied the cost-effectiveness framework. Because etelcalcetide is an intravenous therapy that can be titrated for individual patients, and because its utilization is yet to be assessed in real world settings, a range of plausible doses were estimated for etelcalcetide to define a range of prices. These were either in relation to the existing oral calcimimetic cinacalcet or compared to no calcimimetic treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The value-based price of etelcalcetide was determined via a Markov model. This model combined data from the etelcalcetide trials and previously published cost-effectiveness models in SHPT, and allowed extrapolation of treatment effects on mortality, cardiovascular events, fracture, and parathyroidectomy. Several dosing scenarios were explored covering the dose ranges of 30.0-64.18 mg per day for cinacalcet and 1.07-3.11 mg per day for etelcalcetide. These included the mean dose from the etelcalcetide trials, the preliminary defined daily dose, and the expected most common dose in real world. An acceptable price range for etelcalcetide was assessed by comparing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios obtained with the willingness-to-pay threshold range of $100,000-$300,000/quality-adjusted life-years.

RESULTS

Cost-effectiveness analysis supported value-based prices for etelcalcetide ranging from $21.15-$49.97/mg vs cinacalcet, and $13.79-$119.45/mg vs no calcimimetics.

LIMITATIONS

There is uncertainty around what the real-world dosing will be for etelcalcetide. Another important nuance is that no studies have examined etelcalcetide effects on hard outcomes and, therefore, this modeling exercise relied on an extrapolation approach.

CONCLUSIONS

This cost-effectiveness analysis, including scenarios to address uncertainties, allowed estimation of a value-based price range to aid reimbursement decisions in the US.