Serum BTP concentrations are not affected by hepatic dysfunction

Assessment of glomerular filtration rate in patients with cirrhosis: Available tools and perspectives

Renal dysfunction often complicates the course of liver disease, resulting in higher morbidity and mortality. The accurate assessment of kidney function in these patients is essential to early identify, stage and treat renal impairment as well as to better predict the prognosis, prioritize the patients for liver transplantation and decide whether to opt for simultaneous liver-kidney transplants. This review analyses the available tools for direct or indirect assessment of glomerular filtration rate, focusing on the flaws and strengths of each method in the specific setting of cirrhosis. The aim is to deliver a clear-cut view on this complex issue, trying to point out which strategies to prefer in this context, especially in the peculiar setting of liver transplantation. Moreover, a glance is given at future promising tools for glomerular filtration rate assessment, including new biomarkers and new equations specifically modelled for the cirrhotic population.

Assessment of kidney function: clinical indications for measured GFR

In the vast majority of cases, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is estimated using serum creatinine, which is highly influenced by age, sex, muscle mass, body composition, severe chronic illness and many other factors. This often leads to misclassification of patients or potentially puts patients at risk for inappropriate clinical decisions. Possible solutions are the use of cystatin C as an alternative endogenous marker or performing direct measurement of GFR using an exogenous marker such as iohexol. The purpose of this review is to highlight clinical scenarios and conditions such as extreme body composition, Black race, disagreement between creatinine- and cystatin C-based estimated GFR (eGFR), drug dosing, liver cirrhosis, advanced chronic kidney disease and the transition to kidney replacement therapy, non-kidney solid organ transplant recipients and living kidney donors where creatinine-based GFR estimation may be invalid. In contrast to the majority of literature on measured GFR (mGFR), this review does not include aspects of mGFR for research or public health settings but aims to reach practicing clinicians and raise their understanding of the substantial limitations of creatinine. While including cystatin C as a renal biomarker in GFR estimating equations has been shown to increase the accuracy of the GFR estimate, there are also limitations to eGFR based on cystatin C alone or the combination of creatinine and cystatin C in the clinical scenarios described above that can be overcome by measuring GFR with an exogenous marker. We acknowledge that mGFR is not readily available in many centres but hope that this review will highlight and promote the expansion of kidney function diagnostics using standardized mGFR procedures as an important milestone towards more accurate and personalized medicine.

A Review of Specific Biomarkers of Chronic Renal Injury and Their Potential Application in Nonclinical Safety Assessment Studies

A host of novel renal biomarkers have been developed over the past few decades which have enhanced monitoring of renal disease and drug-induced kidney injury in both preclinical studies and in humans. Since chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) share similar underlying mechanisms and the tubulointerstitial compartment has a functional role in the progression of CKD, urinary biomarkers of AKI may provide predictive information in chronic renal disease. Numerous studies have explored whether the recent AKI biomarkers could improve upon the standard clinical biomarkers, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, for predicting outcomes in CKD patients. This review is an introduction to alternative assays that can be utilized in chronic (>3 months duration) nonclinical safety studies to provide information on renal dysfunction and to demonstrate specific situations where these assays could be utilized in nonclinical drug development. Novel biomarkers such as symmetrical dimethyl arginine, dickkopf homolog 3, and cystatin C predict chronic renal injury in animals, act as surrogates for GFR, and may predict changes in GFR in patients over time, ultimately providing a bridge from preclinical to clinical renal monitoring.

Does Beta-Trace Protein (BTP) Outperform Cystatin C as a Diagnostic Marker of Acute Kidney Injury Complicating the Early Phase of Acute Pancreatitis?

Acute pancreatitis (AP) belongs to the commonest acute gastrointestinal conditions requiring hospitalization. Acute kidney injury (AKI) often complicates moderately severe and severe AP, leading to increased mortality. Among the laboratory markers proposed for early diagnosis of AKI, few have been studied in AP, including cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Beta-trace protein (BTP), a low-molecular-weight glycoprotein proposed as an early marker of decreased glomerular filtration, has never been studied in AP. We investigated the diagnostic usefulness of serum BTP for early diagnosis of AKI complicating AP in comparison to previously studied markers. BTP was measured in serum samples collected over the first three days of hospital stay from 73 adult patients admitted within 24 h of mild to severe AP. Thirteen patients (18%) developed AKI in the early phase of AP. Serum BTP was higher in patients who developed AKI, starting from the first day of hospitalization. Strong correlations were observed between BTP and serum cystatin C but not serum or urine NGAL. On admission, BTP positively correlated with endothelial dysfunction. The diagnostic usefulness of BTP for AKI was similar to cystatin C and lower than NGAL. Increased BTP is an early predictor of AKI complicating AP. However, it does not outperform cystatin C or NGAL.

Development and Validation of Residual Kidney Function Estimating Equations in Dialysis Patients

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Measurement of residual kidney function is recommended for the adjustment of the dialysis prescription, but timed urine collections are difficult and prone to errors. Equations to calculate residual kidney function from serum concentrations of endogenous filtration markers and demographic parameters would simplify monitoring of residual kidney function. However, few equations to estimate residual kidney function using serum concentrations of small solutes and low-molecular-weight proteins have been developed and externally validated.

STUDY DESIGN

Study of diagnostic test accuracy.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

823 Chinese peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients (development cohort) and 826 PD and hemodialysis patients from the Netherlands NECOSAD study (validation cohort).

TESTS COMPARED

Equations to estimate residual kidney function (estimated clearance [eCl]) using serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, cystatin C, β2-microglobulin (B2M), β-trace protein (BTP), and combinations, as well as demographic variables (age, sex, height, and weight). Equations were developed using multivariable linear regression analysis in the development cohort and then tested in the validation cohort. Equations were compared with published validated equations.

OUTCOMES

Residual kidney function measured as urinary clearance (mCl) of urea nitrogen (mClUN) and average of creatinine and urea nitrogen clearance (mClUN-cr).

RESULTS

In external validation, bias (difference between mCl and eCl) was within ± 1.0 unit for all equations. Accuracy (percent of differences within ± 2.0 units) was significantly better for eClBTP, eClB2M, and eClBTP-B2M than eClUN-cr for both mClUN (78%, 80%, and 81% vs 72%; P < 0.05 for all) and mClUN-cr (72%, 78%, and 79% vs 68%; P < 0.05 for all). The area under the curve for predicting mClUN > 2.0 mL/min was highest for eClB2M (0.853) and eClBTP-B2M (0.848). Results were similar for other validated equations.

LIMITATIONS

Development cohort only consisted of PD patients, no gold-standard method for residual kidney function measurement.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm the validity and extend the generalizability of residual kidney function estimating equations from serum concentrations of low-molecular-weight proteins without urine collection.