1
|
Eissa A, Rodriguez Peñaranda N, Ticonosco M, Resca S, Piro A, Amato M, Ferretti S, Elsherbiny A, El-Bahnasy A, Zoeir A, Hagras A, Abdel Raheem A, Boggi U, Furian L, Territo A, Farahat Y, Bianchi G, Güven S, Puliatti S, Gozen A, Micali S. Urologists' proficiency in various donor nephrectomy approaches: a real-life survey, systematic review, and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:399-422. [PMID: 39051889 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.24.05789-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Donor nephrectomy (DN) is a unique surgical procedure in urological practice, as it involves exposing a healthy individual to the potential risks of surgery. This type of surgery exhibits heterogeneity in terms of approach (open, laparoscopic, or robotic), each with its unique set of advantages and disadvantages. Consequently, there is currently a lack of universally agreed upon clear guidelines. In these settings, this study aims to evaluate transplantation surgeons' knowledge through a real-life survey and compare it with data from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The study is divided into two parts, with the first part focusing on the outcomes of the real-life survey designed to assess surgeons' knowledge about different DN approaches and their real-world practices during the surgery. The second part involves a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, specifically examining the outcomes of different surgical approaches to DN. The systematic review followed the PRISMA Guidelines and involved a search of PubMed and Web of Science for RCTs comparing the outcomes of different DN approaches. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool. The random effect model was mainly used to assess the mean difference of the included studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The study was conducted between July 2021 and January 2022 and surveyed 50 surgeons, of which 35 participants (70%) completed the survey. Regarding various approaches to DN, 97.14% of surgeons reported having experience with live DN, and 45.72% performed over 15 cases per year. The most performed approach was pure laparoscopic DN (68.57%). Pure laparoscopic DN was the preferred approach for 77.42% of respondents. The review process resulted in 335 articles, of which 35 were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. In summary, most studies found that laparoscopic approaches, including standard, hand-assisted, LESS-DN, and mini-LDN, resulted in less postoperative pain, better cosmetic, and quicker recovery times compared to open approaches. The main limitation of the current study is the heterogeneity of the included studies. CONCLUSIONS The study provides valuable insights into the practices of renal transplantation surgeons, offering a comprehensive comparison to level 1 studies (RCTs) in the field. It underscores the continued significance of ODN in contemporary practice, particularly in light of recommendations from the EAU guidelines on renal transplantation. This reaffirms the need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches, including factors such as cost, postoperative pain, and cosmetic outcomes. While robotic-assisted DN holds promise, their adoption remains variable, potentially due to limited robust evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Eissa
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
| | | | - Marco Ticonosco
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefano Resca
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Adele Piro
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy -
| | - Marco Amato
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Stefania Ferretti
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ahmed Elsherbiny
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
| | | | - Ahmed Zoeir
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Ayman Hagras
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
- Sharurah Armed Forces Hospital, Ministry of Defense, Sharurah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Abdel Raheem
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
- Department of Urology, King Saud Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of General Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Territo
- Department of Urology, Puigvert Foundation, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yasser Farahat
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tanta, Tanta, Egypt
- Sheikh Khalifa General Hospital, Umm al-Quwain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Giampaolo Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Stefano Puliatti
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ali Gozen
- Department of Urology, Medius Kliniken, Ruit, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Salvatore Micali
- Department of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hu N, Yang Z, Wang A. Early Post-Transplant Adaptation Experience in Young and Middle-Aged People With Kidney Transplant in China: A Qualitative Study. West J Nurs Res 2024; 46:356-365. [PMID: 38500353 DOI: 10.1177/01939459241238683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Successful adaptation to post-transplantation life in patients who have undergone kidney transplants is crucial. The psychosocial needs of people with kidney transplants are closely related to the health of the transplanted kidney. If transplant recipients cannot adapt to the effects of the transplant, their physical and mental health will be seriously impaired. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to explore the early post-transplant adaptation experience of young and middle-aged persons with kidney transplants in China based on the Roy adaptation model. METHODS A qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Fifteen young and middle-aged persons with kidney transplant were recruited from a tertiary hospital in China between September 2022 and March 2023 through purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS This study identified 4 themes: (1) "two-sided" changes in physiological functioning, (2) "dawn and darkness" (conflicting perceived emotions about the future), (3) role functioning adaptation conflict and impairment, and (4) social isolation and the challenges of coping. CONCLUSIONS This study found that early post-transplant adaptation in young and middle-aged people with kidney transplant included both positive and negative experiences, and these findings can provide new insights into research related to successful post-operative adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Hu
- Department of Transplantation, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zhen Yang
- Department of Public Service, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Aiping Wang
- Department of Public Service, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cooper TE, Dalton A, Kieu A, Gately R, Bourke MJ, Craig JC, Khalid R, Lim WH, Scholes-Robertson N, Teixeira-Pinto A, Jaure A, Wong G, Howell M. Patient Preferences for the Management of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Kidney Transplantation: a Discrete Choice Experiment. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:1978-1988. [PMID: 37850002 PMCID: PMC10577360 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in kidney transplant are common and debilitating. We aimed to ascertain patients' preferences for GI symptom management options to help future interventions align with treatment priorities. Methods A discrete choice experiment was conducted with kidney transplant recipients in 3 Australian nephrology units. A multinomial logit model was used to quantify the preferences and trade-offs between 5 characteristics: cost, formulation, symptom burden, dietary changes, and medication quantities. Results Seventy patients participated (mean age ± SD: 47 ± 15 years, 56% female), 57% had GI symptoms. Patients preferred interventions that will achieve complete resolution of GI symptoms compared to no improvement (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 15.3 [1.80, 129.50]), were delivered as a tablet rather than a sachet (1.6 [1.27, 2.08]), retained their current diet compared to eliminating food groups (6.0 [2.19, 16.27]), reduced medication burden (1.4 [1.06, 1.79]), and had lower costs (0.98 [0.96, 1.00]). Participants would be willing to pay AUD$142.20 [$83.90, $200.40] monthly to achieve complete resolution of GI symptoms or AUD$100.90 [$9.60, $192.10] to have moderate improvement in symptoms. Conclusions Interventions that are highly effective in relieving all GI symptoms without the need for substantive dietary changes, and in tablet form, are most preferred by kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tess E. Cooper
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Amy Dalton
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Anh Kieu
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Ryan Gately
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Australia
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael J. Bourke
- Westmead Hospital, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan C. Craig
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Australia
| | - Rabia Khalid
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Wai H. Lim
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Armando Teixeira-Pinto
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Allison Jaure
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Australia
| | - Martin Howell
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Assessment of the Nutritional Status and Quality of Life in Chronic Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant Patients: A Comparative Analysis. Nutrients 2022; 14:nu14224814. [PMID: 36432502 PMCID: PMC9692759 DOI: 10.3390/nu14224814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic kidney disease (CKD) can significantly influence a patient's nutritional status, leading to malnutrition. Malnutrition is associated with an increase in morbidity and hospital admissions, as well as a decrease in functional status. All these factors impact emotional, physical, and psychosocial health, leading to a lower quality of life (QOL). The aim of the study was to assess the nutritional status and QOL in patients with CKD compared to patients after kidney transplantation and determine what factors influence nutritional status and QOL in this patient population. METHODS The study included 167 patients: 39 pre-dialysis patients-group 1; 65 dialysis patients-group 2; 63 kidney transplant patients-group 3. Patients completed the Kidney Disease Quality of Life questionnaire (KDQoL) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment questionnaire (MNA). RESULTS A comparative analysis of the QOL of patients in the three study groups showed no statistically significant differences in the overall KDQoL scores. Factors that affected quality of life included the designated group, determined by disease status, MNA score, patient age, and WHR. Nearly 1/3 of patients from groups 2 and 3 were at risk of malnutrition. CONCLUSIONS A systematic assessment of nutritional status and monitoring of QOL should be integrated into the standard management guidelines for CKD patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cardiovascular Risk after Kidney Transplantation: Causes and Current Approaches to a Relevant Burden. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12081200. [PMID: 35893294 PMCID: PMC9329988 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12081200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Cardiovascular disease is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation and represents the leading cause of mortality in this population. Material and Methods. We searched for the relevant articles in the National Institutes of Health library of medicine, transplant, cardiologic and nephrological journals. Results. The pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant is multifactorial. Apart from non-modifiable risk factors, such as age, gender, genetic predisposition and ethnicity, several traditional and non-traditional modifiable risk factors contribute to its development. Traditional factors, such as diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia, may be present before and may worsen after transplantation. Immunosuppressants and impaired graft function may strongly influence the exacerbation of these comorbidities. However, in the last years, several studies showed that many other cardiovascular risk factors may be involved in kidney transplantation, including hyperuricemia, inflammation, low klotho and elevated Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 levels, deficient levels of vitamin D, vascular calcifications, anemia and poor physical activity and quality of life. Conclusions. The timely and effective treatment of time-honored and recently discovered modifiable risk factors represent the basis of the prevention of cardiovascular complications in kidney transplantation. Reduction of cardiovascular risk can improve the life expectancy, the quality of life and the allograft function and survival.
Collapse
|
6
|
Brinza C, Covic A, Stefan AE, Floria M, Popa IV, Scripcariu DV, Burlacu A. Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Adverse Outcomes after Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:1944. [PMID: 35407552 PMCID: PMC8999673 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PH) has a high prevalence in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, especially those undergoing kidney transplantation (KT). We aimed to systematically review and calculate the pooled effect size of the literature evaluating the association between pre-existing PH documented by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or invasively and adverse outcomes following KT. The primary composite outcome extracted from the included studies was represented by the mortality from any cause following KT and delayed graft function (DGF), graft dysfunction, or graft failure. The secondary outcomes were represented by individual components of the primary composite outcome. Twelve studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected. The main finding is that pre-existing PH was associated with increased mortality and a higher rate of DGF, kidney graft dysfunction, or failure in KT recipients. The effect remained significant for all outcomes irrespective of PH evaluation, invasively or using TTE. Consequently, patients with PH defined only by TTE were at higher risk of death, DGF, or graft failure. Our findings support the routine assessment of PH in patients on the KT waitlist. PH might represent an extensively available and valuable tool for risk stratification in KT patients. These data should be confirmed in large prospective clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Crischentian Brinza
- Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 700503 Iasi, Romania;
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Grigore T Popa, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (A.C.); (M.F.); (I.V.P.)
| | - Adrian Covic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Grigore T Popa, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (A.C.); (M.F.); (I.V.P.)
- Nephrology Clinic, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Center—Constantin Ion Parhon University Hospital, 700503 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Anca Elena Stefan
- Nephrology Clinic, Dialysis and Renal Transplant Center—Constantin Ion Parhon University Hospital, 700503 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Mariana Floria
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Grigore T Popa, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (A.C.); (M.F.); (I.V.P.)
- Doctor Iacob Czihac Military Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700483 Iasi, Romania
| | - Iolanda Valentina Popa
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Grigore T Popa, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (A.C.); (M.F.); (I.V.P.)
| | - Dragos-Viorel Scripcariu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Grigore T Popa, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (A.C.); (M.F.); (I.V.P.)
| | - Alexandru Burlacu
- Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, 700503 Iasi, Romania;
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Grigore T Popa, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (A.C.); (M.F.); (I.V.P.)
| |
Collapse
|