Assessment of primary rehabilitation needs in neurological rehabilitation: translation, adaptation and face validity of the Danish version of Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended

Return to Work One Year after Moderate to Severe Traumatic Injury in a Working Age Population

Background/Objectives: Physical trauma may cause long-term disabilities. The importance of place of residence in the return to work after injuries is little researched. The primary aims of this study were to describe return to work or school (RTW) at 6 and 12 months after moderate to severe traumatic injury and to investigate demographic and injury-related predictors for RTW with an initial focus on geographic centrality of residency. The secondary aim was to investigate the association between RTW and functioning. Methods: A prospective cohort study conducted at two Norwegian trauma centres. Inclusion criteria: age 18 to 70 years, at least a two-day hospital stay and a New Injury Severity Score > 9. Information about centrality, demographics, injuries, and return to work were collected. Associations between possible predictors and RTW were assessed using binary logistic regression. Results: Of the 223 participants, 68% had returned to work after 6 months and 77% after 12 months. Twelve-month RTW was 89% after thorax/abdomen injuries, 78% after extremity/spine injuries and 73% after head injuries. More central residency was a significant predictor for RTW in univariable but only within the extremity/spine injury subgroup in multivariable analysis. Negative factors were age, having a blue-collar job, number of injuries and rehabilitation complexity. Function 12 months post-injury was associated with RTW in the multivariable model. Conclusions: RTW after one year was high in all major trauma groups. Demographic and injury-related factors were more important predictors of RTW than centrality of residency. Blue-collar workers and patients with multiple injuries and high rehabilitation complexity should be given special attention to support RTW.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Korean version of rehabilitation complexity scale for the measurement of complex rehabilitation needs

The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale-Extended version 13 (RCS-E v13) to develop the Korean version of the Rehabilitation Complexity Scale (KRCS), and to explore its reliability, and concurrent and construct validity.This research was an observational study of a series of consecutive rehabilitation inpatients who were previously assessed with KRCS and grouped with the Korean rehabilitation patient group version 1.1 (KRPG v1.1). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the RCS-E v13 were implemented according to internationally recognized standards. Four hundred thirty inpatients diagnosed with complex neurological or musculoskeletal disabilities were enrolled. Physiatrists were asked to finish the KRCS at admission and to complete a second time with an interval of a minimum of 3 weeks to a maximum of 4 weeks for reliability evaluation. At discharge, the KRCS was completed a third time to explore constructive validity.The Cronbach-α was 0.63. The intraclass correlation coefficient values of the total score, Medical, Nursing, Care, Therapy Disciplines, Therapy Intensity, and Especial Needs domains were 0.86, 0.69, 0.84, 0.83, 0.74, 0.74, and 0.79, respectively (P < .01). The scale was repeatable (Spearman rho 0.69-0.86) and correlated strongly with disability measures (Spearman rho 0.37-0.50). Exploratory factor analysis revealed 2 clear factors ("Medical/Nursing" and "Care/Therapy Disciplines/Therapy Intensity/Equipment"). The goodness-of-fit index in the confirmatory factor analysis was 0.87. The KRCS was associated with a higher explanatory power for rehabilitation resources and length of stay than the KRPG v1.1.Our data suggest that the KRCS is a feasible, reliable, and valid tool that is appropriate for the measurement of clinical complexity in Korean intensive rehabilitation units. Further, it may provide case-mix adjustment to improve the rehabilitation delivery system in Korea.