1
|
Flusund AMH, Bø LE, Reinertsen I, Solheim O, Skandsen T, Håberg A, Andelic N, Vik A, Moen KG. Lesion Frequency Distribution Maps of Traumatic Axonal Injury on Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury and Associations to 12 Months Outcome. J Neurotrauma 2024. [PMID: 38588255 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Traumatic axonal injury (TAI) is a common finding on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), and the burden of TAI is associated with outcome in this patient group. Lesion mapping offers a way to combine imaging findings from numerous individual patients into common lesion maps where the findings from a whole patient cohort can be assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the spatial distribution of TAI lesions on different MRI sequences and its associations to outcome with use of lesion mapping. Included prospectively were 269 patients (8-70 years) with moderate or severe TBI and MRI within six weeks after injury. The TAI lesions were evaluated and manually segmented on fluid-attenuated inversed recovery (FLAIR), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), and either T2* gradient echo (T2*GRE) or susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). The segmentations were registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute space and combined to lesion frequency distribution maps. Outcome was assessed with Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score at 12 months. The frequency and distribution of TAI was assessed qualitatively by visual reading. Univariable associations to outcome were assessed qualitatively by visual reading and also quantitatively with use of voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping (VLSM). The highest frequency of TAI was found in the posterior half of corpus callosum. The frequency of TAI was higher in the frontal and temporal lobes than in the parietal and occipital lobes, and in the upper parts of the brainstem than in the lower. At the group level, all voxels in mesencephalon had TAI on FLAIR. The patients with poorest outcome (GOSE scores ≤4) had higher frequencies of TAI. On VLSM, poor outcome was associated with TAI lesions bilaterally in the splenium, the right side of tectum, tegmental mesencephalon, and pons. In conclusion, we found higher frequency of TAI in posterior corpus callosum, and TAI in splenium, mesencephalon, and pons were associated with poor outcome. If lesion frequency distribution maps containing outcome information based on imaging findings from numerous patients in the future can be compared with the imaging findings from individual patients, it would offer a new tool in the clinical workup and outcome prediction of the patient with TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Mari Holte Flusund
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Molde Hospital, Molde, Norway
| | - Lars Eirik Bø
- SINTEF Digital, Department of Health Research, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ingerid Reinertsen
- SINTEF Digital, Department of Health Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ole Solheim
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Toril Skandsen
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Clinic of Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Asta Håberg
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Norway
| | - Anne Vik
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kent Gøran Moen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Radiology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen Hospital, Drammen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bockhop F, Greving S, Zeldovich M, Krenz U, Cunitz K, Timmermann D, Kieslich M, Andelic N, Buchheim A, Koerte IK, Roediger M, Brockmann K, Bonfert MV, Berweck S, Lendt M, Staebler M, von Steinbuechel N. Applicability and clinical utility of the German rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire in proxies of children after traumatic brain injury: an instrument validation study. BMC Neurol 2024; 24:133. [PMID: 38641780 PMCID: PMC11027521 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-024-03587-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The German Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) can be used to assess post-concussion symptoms (PCS) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adults, adolescents, and children. METHODS In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of the German RPQ proxy version (N = 146) for children (8-12 years) after TBI at the item, total and scale score level. Construct validity was analyzed using rank correlations with the proxy-assessed Post-Concussion Symptoms Inventory (PCSI-P), the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale 7 (GAD-7). Furthermore, sensitivity testing was performed concerning subjects' sociodemographic and injury-related characteristics. Differential item functioning (DIF) was analyzed to assess the comparability of RPQ proxy ratings for children with those for adolescents. RESULTS Good internal consistency was demonstrated regarding Cronbach's α (0.81-0.90) and McDonald's ω (0.84-0.92). The factorial validity of a three-factor model was superior to the original one-factor model. Proxy ratings of the RPQ total and scale scores were strongly correlated with the PCSI-P (ϱ = 0.50-0.69), as well as moderately to strongly correlated with the PHQ-9 (ϱ = 0.49-0.65) and the GAD-7 (ϱ = 0.44-0.64). The DIF analysis revealed no relevant differences between the child and adolescent proxy versions. CONCLUSIONS The German RPQ proxy is a psychometrically reliable and valid instrument for assessing PCS in children after TBI. Therefore, RPQ self- and proxy-ratings can be used to assess PCS in childhood as well as along the lifespan of an individual after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sven Greving
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Psychology, University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
- Faculty of Psychotherapy Science, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ugne Krenz
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Cunitz
- Institute of Psychology, University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Dagmar Timmermann
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Division of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Kieslich
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Nada Andelic
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Department of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna Buchheim
- Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Sport Science, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Inga K Koerte
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Ludwig‑Maximilians‑Universität München, Munich, Germany
- Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Mass General Brigham, Bosten, USA
| | - Maike Roediger
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine and Neonatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Knut Brockmann
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Michaela V Bonfert
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, LMU Center for Development and Children With Medical Complexity, Ludwig‑Maximilians‑Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Berweck
- Specialist Center for Paediatric Neurology, Neurorehabilitation and Epileptology, Schoen Klinik, Vogtareuth, Germany
| | - Michael Lendt
- Neuropediatrics, St. Mauritius Therapeutic Clinic, Meerbusch, Germany
| | - Michael Staebler
- Neurological Rehabilitation Center for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults, Hegau-Jugendwerk GmbH, Gailingen am Hochrhein, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Howe EI, Andelic N, Brunborg C, Zeldovich M, Helseth E, Skandsen T, Olsen A, Fure SCR, Theadom A, Rauen K, Madsen BÅ, Jacobs B, van der Naalt J, Tartaglia MC, Einarsen CE, Storvig G, Tronvik E, Tverdal C, von Steinbüchel N, Røe C, Hellstrøm T. Frequency and predictors of headache in the first 12 months after traumatic brain injury: results from CENTER-TBI. J Headache Pain 2024; 25:44. [PMID: 38528477 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-024-01751-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Headache is a prevalent and debilitating symptom following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Large-scale, prospective cohort studies are needed to establish long-term headache prevalence and associated factors after TBI. This study aimed to assess the frequency and severity of headache after TBI and determine whether sociodemographic factors, injury severity characteristics, and pre- and post-injury comorbidities predicted changes in headache frequency and severity during the first 12 months after injury. METHODS A large patient sample from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) prospective observational cohort study was used. Patients were stratified based on their clinical care pathway: admitted to an emergency room (ER), a ward (ADM) or an intensive care unit (ICU) in the acute phase. Headache was assessed using a single item from the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire measured at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after injury. Mixed-effect logistic regression analyses were applied to investigate changes in headache frequency and associated predictors. RESULTS A total of 2,291 patients responded to the headache item at baseline. At study enrolment, 59.3% of patients reported acute headache, with similar frequencies across all strata. Female patients and those aged up to 40 years reported a higher frequency of headache at baseline compared to males and older adults. The frequency of severe headache was highest in patients admitted to the ICU. The frequency of headache in the ER stratum decreased substantially from baseline to 3 months and remained from 3 to 6 months. Similar trajectory trends were observed in the ICU and ADM strata across 12 months. Younger age, more severe TBI, fatigue, neck pain and vision problems were among the predictors of more severe headache over time. More than 25% of patients experienced headache at 12 months after injury. CONCLUSIONS Headache is a common symptom after TBI, especially in female and younger patients. It typically decreases in the first 3 months before stabilising. However, more than a quarter of patients still experienced headache at 12 months after injury. Translational research is needed to advance the clinical decision-making process and improve targeted medical treatment for headache. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02210221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Eirik Helseth
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Research and Development, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Toril Skandsen
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Clinic of Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- NorHEAD - Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Alexander Olsen
- Clinic of Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- NorHEAD - Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Silje C R Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Alice Theadom
- TBI Network, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Katrin Rauen
- Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshöhe, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Traumatology & Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Benedikte Å Madsen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bram Jacobs
- Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joukje van der Naalt
- Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Carmela Tartaglia
- Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Canadian Concussion Centre, Krembil Brain Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Memory Clinic, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cathrine Elisabeth Einarsen
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Clinic of Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Gøril Storvig
- Clinic of Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- NorHEAD - Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Erling Tronvik
- NorHEAD - Norwegian Centre for Headache Research, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurology, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Cathrine Tverdal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Research and Development, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dahl HM, Holthe IL, Andelic N, Løvstad M, Myhre MC. Unmet health care needs over the first 2 years after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2024; 49:73-81. [PMID: 38430714 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
AIM Few studies have addressed how children and adolescents with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) access health care and educational services. This study aimed to investigate the course of symptoms during the first two years after TBI, whether symptoms implied a need for health care and/or educational services, and the extent of unmet needs. The association between unmet needs and health-related quality of life was also explored. METHODS This prospective cohort study was conducted at Oslo University Hospital, Norway, from 2015 to 2018. Forty-nine patients aged 1-15 years hospitalized due to TBI were included and followed for 24 months. Registration of symptoms and identification of unmet needs was based on clinical assessment, self-reports and interviews with patients and parents during the acute phase and at 6 and 24 months postinjury. RESULTS Twenty-five percent of the sample presented with unmet needs at 24 months. Compared to the group with no needs and met needs, these patients reported lasting cognitive and emotional symptoms affecting school and social interaction and scored lower on health-related quality of life. CONCLUSION Pediatric patients with TBI may have long-term symptom burden affecting school and social functioning, leading to unmet needs if targeted services are not provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Margrete Dahl
- Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences for Children, Section for Child Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Ingvil Laberg Holthe
- Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dept. of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Dept. of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Mia C Myhre
- Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Nydalen, Oslo, Norway; Dept. of Neonatal Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Forslund MV, Borgen IMH, Karic T, Kleffelgård I, Hauger SL, Løvstad M, van Walsem MR, Howe EI, Brunborg C, Andelic N, Røe C. Validity of the Norwegian Version of the Needs and Provision Complexity Scale (NPCS) in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Atraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. J Clin Med 2024; 13:752. [PMID: 38337446 PMCID: PMC10856215 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
There is a lack of validated measures in Scandinavian languages to track healthcare service needs and delivery for patients with neurological disabilities. The aim of the present study was to validate the Norwegian version of the clinician and patient Needs and Provision Complexity Scale (NPCS) Needs and Gets. Data on the NPCS from 60 adult patients with traumatic brain injury or atraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage and symptoms lasting >5 months were assessed for inter-rater/test-retest reliability and agreement, as well as concurrent validity with the Neurological Impairment Scale (NIS), the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ). The clinician NPCS showed good-excellent inter-rater reliability, and the patient NPCS demonstrated good-excellent test-retest reliability. Absolute agreement was moderate-excellent across all clinician and patient items. Concurrent validity was significant, with large correlations between clinician NPCS-Needs and the NIS and FIM total scores, and small-medium correlations between the clinician and patient NPCS-Gets and the NIS and FIM total scores. There were no significant correlations between the NPCS and the CIQ. The study findings support the use of the Norwegian version of the NPCS to assess met and unmet healthcare and support needs for Norwegian-speaking adults with neurological disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit V. Forslund
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (T.K.); (I.K.); (S.L.H.); (E.I.H.); (N.A.); (C.R.)
| | - Ida M. H. Borgen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (T.K.); (I.K.); (S.L.H.); (E.I.H.); (N.A.); (C.R.)
| | - Tanja Karic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (T.K.); (I.K.); (S.L.H.); (E.I.H.); (N.A.); (C.R.)
| | - Ingerid Kleffelgård
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (T.K.); (I.K.); (S.L.H.); (E.I.H.); (N.A.); (C.R.)
| | - Solveig L. Hauger
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (T.K.); (I.K.); (S.L.H.); (E.I.H.); (N.A.); (C.R.)
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Bjørnemyr, Norway;
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Bjørnemyr, Norway;
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Marleen R. van Walsem
- Department of Neurohabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway;
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie I. Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (T.K.); (I.K.); (S.L.H.); (E.I.H.); (N.A.); (C.R.)
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (T.K.); (I.K.); (S.L.H.); (E.I.H.); (N.A.); (C.R.)
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (T.K.); (I.K.); (S.L.H.); (E.I.H.); (N.A.); (C.R.)
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Røe C, Borgen IMH, Fure SCR, Forslund MV, Kleffelgård I, Andelic N, Løvstad M, Hauger SL. The Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O): measurement properties of the Norwegian version after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2024; 38:12-18. [PMID: 38240028 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2024.2304855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To translate and evaluate the validity of the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O) in a Norwegian context. METHODS One hundred and twenty persons with TBI with verified intracranial lesions and persistent symptoms lasting more than 2 years, included in a randomized controlled trial, rated their participation using the PART-O at baseline. The PART-O with its three subscales (Productivity, Out and About, and Social Relations) was translated to Norwegian. Descriptive statistics, Cronbach's alpha, Rasch analysis, and correlation analysis were applied. RESULTS The Rasch analysis indicated a unidimensional construct of PART-O and its subscales (χ2 < 12.69, p > 0.28). The internal consistency was moderate (Cronbach's alpha 0.48-0.52) and there was a need to reduce scaling options for most of the items. The Out and About and Productivity subscales had considerable floor effects. PART-O showed moderate positive correlation to TBI-related quality of life and global functioning. CONCLUSIONS PART-O and its subscales reflect unidimensional aspects of participation. In the present Norwegian TBI population the original scaling of PART-O was too detailed for all subscales. The floor effects and suboptimal targeting between items and subjects participation level of the Out and About subscale is a matter of concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ida M H Borgen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C R Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit V Forslund
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingerid Kleffelgård
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyr, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Solveig L Hauger
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyr, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Theadom A, Andelic N, Chavda V, Pedersen M. Unravelling the current shortfalls, challenges, and opportunities in traumatic brain injury. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:438. [PMID: 38082269 PMCID: PMC10712056 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03484-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The brain is the control centre of the human body. Injury to the brain can have diverse and disabling effects. Yet there remain important unanswered questions for clinicians, those affected and their families. This special collection aims to advance understanding of how we can better diagnose, treat and support those affected by brain injury across the severity spectrum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Theadom
- Traumatic Brain Injury Network and the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - N Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - V Chavda
- Department of Pathology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA, 94305, USA
- Department of Medicine, Multispeciality, Trauma and ICCU Center, Sardar Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
| | - M Pedersen
- Traumatic Brain Injury Network and the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hauger SL, Borgen IMH, Forslund MV, Kleffelgård I, Andelic N, Løvstad M, Perrin PB, Røe C, Fure SCR. Participation in the Chronic Phase after Traumatic Brain Injury: Variations and Key Predictors. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5584. [PMID: 37685651 PMCID: PMC10488924 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Participation is of major importance for individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study evaluates participation over a period of one year among persons with TBI in the chronic phase and explores sociodemographic, psychological, and environmental predictors of levels and trajectories of participation. One hundred and twenty home-living survivors of TBI with persistent injury-related consequences at least two years post-injury who participated in a goal-oriented randomized trial were assessed at baseline and after four and twelve months. Linear mixed-effects model analysis was applied to evaluate height, trajectory slope, and predictors of the Participation Assessment with the Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O) total score and the subscales Productivity, Social Relations, and Being Out and About. Being married, having a higher education, and having good global functioning predicted more frequent participation. Education, executive- and global functions predicted Productivity, while age and being married predicted Social Relations. Participating in the study during the COVID-19 pandemic had a negative impact on Productivity. Participation was relatively stable over 12 months, with a slight decline, but may be influenced by demographic factors and functional consequences. Rehabilitation services should particularly focus on people with TBI living alone with lower levels of global and executive function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solveig L. Hauger
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Bjørnemyr, Norway;
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Ida M. H. Borgen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (C.R.); (S.C.R.F.)
| | - Marit V. Forslund
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (C.R.); (S.C.R.F.)
| | - Ingerid Kleffelgård
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (C.R.); (S.C.R.F.)
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (C.R.); (S.C.R.F.)
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Bjørnemyr, Norway;
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Paul B. Perrin
- Department of Psychology, School of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA;
- Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA 23249, USA
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (C.R.); (S.C.R.F.)
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C. R. Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (I.M.H.B.); (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (C.R.); (S.C.R.F.)
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moksnes HØ, Schäfer C, Rasmussen MS, Soberg HL, Røise O, Anke A, Røe C, Næss PA, Gaarder C, Helseth E, Dahl HM, Hestnes M, Brunborg C, Andelic N, Hellstrøm T. Functional Outcomes at 6 and 12 Months Post-Injury in a Trauma Centre Population with Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Injuries. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5300. [PMID: 37629342 PMCID: PMC10455533 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the global functional outcomes after moderate-to-severe traumatic injury at 6 and 12 months and to examine the sociodemographic and injury-related factors that predict these outcomes. A prospective cohort study was conducted in which trauma patients of all ages with a New Injury Severity Score > 9 who were discharged alive from two regional trauma centres in Norway over a one-year period (2020) were included. The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) score was used to analyse the functional outcomes. Regression analyses were performed to investigate the predictors of the GOSE score. Follow-up assessments were obtained from approximately 85% of the 601 included patients at both time points. The mean (SD) GOSE score was 6.1 (1.6) at 6 months and 6.4 (1.6) at 12 months, which corresponds to an upper-moderate disability. One-half of the patients had a persistent disability at 12 months post-injury. The statistically significant predictors of a low GOSE score at both time points were more pre-injury comorbidity, a higher number of injuries, and higher estimated rehabilitation needs, whereas a thorax injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥ 3 predicted higher GOSE scores. A high Glasgow Coma Scale score at admission predicted a higher GOSE score at 6 months. This study strengthens the evidence base for the functional outcomes and predictors in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Håkon Øgreid Moksnes
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway; (C.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.); (N.A.); (T.H.)
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Christoph Schäfer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway; (C.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.); (N.A.); (T.H.)
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, P.O. Box 100, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Mari Storli Rasmussen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway; (C.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.); (N.A.); (T.H.)
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway;
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene Lundgaard Soberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway; (C.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.); (N.A.); (T.H.)
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, N-0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Olav Røise
- Norwegian Trauma Registry, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway;
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (P.A.N.); (C.G.); (E.H.); (H.M.D.)
| | - Audny Anke
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050 Langnes, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, P.O. Box 100, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway; (C.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.); (N.A.); (T.H.)
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway;
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (P.A.N.); (C.G.); (E.H.); (H.M.D.)
| | - Pål Aksel Næss
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (P.A.N.); (C.G.); (E.H.); (H.M.D.)
- Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Christine Gaarder
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (P.A.N.); (C.G.); (E.H.); (H.M.D.)
- Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Helseth
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (P.A.N.); (C.G.); (E.H.); (H.M.D.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Margrete Dahl
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway; (P.A.N.); (C.G.); (E.H.); (H.M.D.)
- Department of Child Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Morten Hestnes
- Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Research and Development, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway;
- Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway; (C.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.); (N.A.); (T.H.)
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956 Nydalen, N-0424 Oslo, Norway; (C.S.); (M.S.R.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.); (N.A.); (T.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kleffelgård I, Andelic N, Bruusgaard KA, Langhammer B, Tamber AL, Soberg HL. Dizziness-Related Disability One Year after a Mild-to-Moderate TBI-A Follow-Up Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5192. [PMID: 37629234 PMCID: PMC10455561 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Persisting dizziness and balance problems after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury (mmTBI) may result in considerable disability. The primary aim of this study was to explore the factors associated with dizziness-related disability one year post-injury. Data from 64 participants (mean age 39.4 [SD 13.0] years; 45 [70.3%] women) with mmTBI from a previous randomised controlled trial were analysed using simple and multiple regression analyses (Clinical Trials Registry #NCT01695577). The Dizziness Handicap Inventory one year (12.1, [SD1.6] months) post-injury was the dependent variable. Demographic and injury-related variables, clinical findings, and measures of post-injury symptoms and functioning (Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire, RPQ; Vertigo Symptom Scale-short form, VSS-SF; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; Balance Error Scoring System; and High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool, HiMAT) at baseline (3.5 [SD 2.1] months post-injury) were the independent variables. Dizziness-related disability at one year was associated with pre-injury comorbidity, neck pain, higher RPQ, higher VSS-SF, and lower HiMAT scores (adjusted R2 = 0.370, F = 6.52 p < 0.001). In conclusion, the factors associated with dizziness-related disability one year post-injury, such as pre-injury comorbidity, neck pain, increased post-concussion symptom burden, increased dizziness symptom severity, and reduced balance and mobility, should be addressed early in the rehabilitation process to reduce patient burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingerid Kleffelgård
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (N.A.); (H.L.S.)
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (N.A.); (H.L.S.)
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Kari Anette Bruusgaard
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway; (K.A.B.); (B.L.); (A.-L.T.)
| | - Birgitta Langhammer
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway; (K.A.B.); (B.L.); (A.-L.T.)
| | - Anne-Lise Tamber
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway; (K.A.B.); (B.L.); (A.-L.T.)
| | - Helene Lundgaard Soberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (N.A.); (H.L.S.)
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway; (K.A.B.); (B.L.); (A.-L.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Madsen BÅ, Fure SCR, Andelic N, Løke D, Løvstad M, Røe C, Howe EI. Exploring the Association between Personality Traits, Symptom Burden, and Return to Work after Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4654. [PMID: 37510769 PMCID: PMC10380528 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 30% of individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) experience persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS). Personality factors have been linked to PPCS, yet, the association between personality traits and outcomes after mTBI is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between personality traits, PPCS, and return to work (RTW) in patients with mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI). Data from eighty-seven participants with mild-to-moderate TBI were analyzed. Sociodemographic, injury, and work characteristics and depressive symptoms were recorded 2-3 months post-injury. Personality traits were measured using the NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3. PPCS and RTW were assessed 15 months post-injury. Multiple linear regression models were performed. The factors associated with more severe PPCS were female sex, higher levels of neuroticism, openness to experience and conscientiousness, extra-cranial injuries, and depressive symptoms. The factors associated with lower RTW were female sex, higher levels of neuroticism, and conscientiousness. However, after controlling for PPCS, personality traits were no longer significantly associated with RTW. In conclusion, specific personality traits were associated with more severe PPCS and may be indirectly associated with RTW via PPCS. Hence, personality traits may be important to assess to identify patients at risk of less favorable outcomes after mild-to-moderate TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikte Å Madsen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C R Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Daniel Løke
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, 1453 Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, 1453 Nesoddtangen, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Løke D, Andelic N, Helseth E, Vassend O, Andersson S, Ponsford JL, Tverdal C, Brunborg C, Løvstad M. Stability and Change in Biopsychosocial Factors Associated With Fatigue 6 and 12 Months After Traumatic Brain Injury: An Exploratory Multilevel Study. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2023; 38:E244-E253. [PMID: 36602267 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore factors associated with stability and change in fatigue from 6 to 12 months following traumatic brain injury (TBI). SETTING Combined in- and outpatient acute care and postacute rehabilitation settings. PARTICIPANTS A total of 103 patients with confirmed intracranial injury were assessed 6 and/or 12 months following TBI. DESIGN A prospective observational study with repeated measures at 2 time points, analyzed with a hybrid mixed-effects model. MAIN MEASURES Primary outcomes were the fatigue factor derived from items from several fatigue patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; Fatigue Severity Scale, Chalder Fatigue Scale, Giessen Subjective Complaints List-fatigue subscale, and Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire-fatigue item) Secondary outcomes were PROMs relating to pain, somatic and psychological distress, insomnia, sleepiness, personality traits, optimism, resilience, behavioral activation and inhibition, and loneliness, as well as neuropsychological measures. Demographic variables and injury severity characteristics were included as covariates. RESULTS In multilevel regression, female sex, years of education, and 3 factors related to injury severity, somatic vulnerability, and psychosocial robustness were all significantly associated with variation in fatigue between subjects, and explained 61% of the variance in fatigue that was due to stable between-subject differences. Fatigue levels declined significantly over time. Changes in pain severity, somatic symptom burden, psychological distress, and behavioral inhibition were positively associated with changes in fatigue, explaining 22% of the variance in fatigue within subjects. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated that several previously implicated factors show robust effects in distinguishing individuals with TBI on levels of fatigue, but only a few show additional within-subject associations across time. Pain severity, somatic symptom burden, psychological distress, and behavioral inhibition correlated with fatigue across time, implicating these factors as crucial targets for rehabilitation of patients with TBI who suffer from persistent fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Løke
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyr, Norway (Mr Løke and Dr Løvstad); Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Mr Løke and Drs Vassend, Andersson, and Løvstad); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, and Institute of Health and Society, Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Dr Andelic); Department of Neurosurgery, Ullevål Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway (Drs Helseth and Tverdal); Psychosomatic and CL Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Dr Andersson); Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, and Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia (Dr Ponsford); and Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ms Brunborg)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schäfer C, Mosknes HØ, Rasmussen MS, Hellstrøm T, Lundgaard Soberg H, Røise O, Røe C, Frisvold S, Bartnes K, Næss PA, Garder C, Helseth E, Bruborg C, Andelic N, Anke A. Adherence to Guidelines for Acute Rehabilitation in the Norwegian Trauma Plan. J Rehabil Med 2023; 55:jrm6552. [PMID: 37366570 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v55.6552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate adherence to 3 central operational recommendations for acute rehabilitation in the Norwegian trauma plan. METHODS A prospective multi-centre study of 538 adults with moderate and severe trauma with New Injury Severity Score > 9. RESULTS Adherence to the first recommendation, assessment by a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician within 72 h following admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the trauma centre, was documented for 18% of patients. Adherence to the second recommendation, early rehabilitation in the intensive care unit, was documented for 72% of those with severe trauma and ≥ 2 days ICU stay. Predictors for early rehabilitation were ICU length of stay and spinal cord injury. Adherence to the third recommendation, direct transfer of patients from acute ward to a specialized rehabilitation unit, was documented in 22% of patients, and occurred more often in those with severe trauma (26%), spinal cord injury (54%) and traumatic brain injury (39%). Being employed, having head or spinal chord injury and longer ICU stay were predictors for direct transfer to a specialized rehabilitation unit. CONCLUSION Adherence to acute rehabilitation guidelines after trauma is poor. This applies to documented early assessment by a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician, and direct transfer from acute care to rehabilitation after head and extremity injuries. These findings indicate a need for more systematic integration of rehabilitation in the acute treatment phase after trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Schäfer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø; Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø; Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo.
| | - Håkon Øgreid Mosknes
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo
| | - Mari S Rasmussen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo
| | - Helene Lundgaard Soberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University
| | - Olav Røise
- Norwegian Trauma Registry, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo
| | - Shirin Frisvold
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø; Department of Intensive Care Medicine
| | - Kristian Bartnes
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø; Division of Cardiothoracic and Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø
| | - Pål Aksel Næss
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital
| | - Christine Garder
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital
| | - Eirik Helseth
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Research and Development
| | - Cathrine Bruborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo
| | - Audny Anke
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø; Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø; Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
von Steinbuechel N, Krenz U, Bockhop F, Koerte IK, Timmermann D, Cunitz K, Zeldovich M, Andelic N, Rojczyk P, Bonfert MV, Berweck S, Kieslich M, Brockmann K, Roediger M, Lendt M, Buchheim A, Muehlan H, Holloway I, Olabarrieta-Landa L. A Multidimensional Approach to Assessing Factors Impacting Health-Related Quality of Life after Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3895. [PMID: 37373590 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In the field of pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI), relationships between pre-injury and injury-related characteristics and post-TBI outcomes (functional recovery, post-concussion depression, anxiety) and their impact on disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are under-investigated. Here, a multidimensional conceptual model was tested using a structural equation model (SEM). The final SEM evaluates the associations between these four latent variables. We retrospectively investigated 152 children (8-12 years) and 148 adolescents (13-17 years) after TBI at the recruiting clinics or online. The final SEM displayed a fair goodness-of-fit (SRMR = 0.09, RMSEA = 0.08 with 90% CI [0.068, 0.085], GFI = 0.87, CFI = 0.83), explaining 39% of the variance across the four latent variables and 45% of the variance in HRQoL in particular. The relationships between pre-injury and post-injury outcomes and between post-injury outcomes and TBI-specific HRQoL were moderately strong. Especially, pre-injury characteristics (children's age, sensory, cognitive, or physical impairments, neurological and chronic diseases, and parental education) may aggravate post-injury outcomes, which in turn may influence TBI-specific HRQoL negatively. Thus, the SEM comprises potential risk factors for developing negative post-injury outcomes, impacting TBI-specific HRQoL. Our findings may assist healthcare providers and parents in the management, therapy, rehabilitation, and care of pediatric individuals after TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole von Steinbuechel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ugne Krenz
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Fabian Bockhop
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Inga K Koerte
- cBRAIN/Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Nussbaumstrasse 5, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Dagmar Timmermann
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Cunitz
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Nada Andelic
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Department of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Philine Rojczyk
- cBRAIN/Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Nussbaumstrasse 5, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Michaela Veronika Bonfert
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, LMU Center for Development and Children with Medical Complexity, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Haydnstr. 5, 80336 Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Berweck
- Specialist Center for Paediatric Neurology, Neurorehabilitation and Epileptology, Schoen Klinik, Krankenhausstraße 20, 83569 Vogtareuth, Germany
| | - Matthias Kieslich
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Hospital of Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Knut Brockmann
- Interdisciplinary Pediatric Center for Children with Developmental Disabilities and Severe Chronic Disorders, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Maike Roediger
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine and Neonatology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Lendt
- Neuropediatrics, St. Mauritius Therapeutic Clinic, Strümper Straße 111, 40670 Meerbusch, Germany
| | - Anna Buchheim
- Institut für Psychologie, Universität Innsbruck, Innrain 52 f, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Holger Muehlan
- Department of Health and Prevention, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Str. 13, 17487 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ivana Holloway
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Laiene Olabarrieta-Landa
- Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Pública de Navarra, Campus de Arrosadía, 31006 Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), 31008 Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Valaas LJV, Soberg HL, Rasmussen MS, Steenstrup SE, Andelic N, Kleffelgård I. Sub-symptom threshold aerobic exercise for patients with persisting post-concussion symptoms and exercise intolerance after mild traumatic brain injury - a study protocol with a nested feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:179. [PMID: 37138202 PMCID: PMC10155435 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03221-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) affect between 34 and 46% after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Many also experience exercise intolerance. Sub-symptom threshold aerobic exercise, SSTAE (exercise at an intensity level that does not increase symptoms) is proposed as a treatment to both reduce the symptom burden and increase the exercise tolerance after the injury. It is unclear if this also applies in a more chronic phase after mTBI. MAIN PURPOSE The main purpose of this study is to evaluate whether SSTAE in addition to ordinary rehabilitation will lead to clinically meaningful improvement of symptom burden, normalize exercise tolerance, increase physical activity, improve health-related quality of life, and reduce patient-specific activity limitations compared to a control group that only receives ordinary rehabilitation. DESIGN Randomized, controlled, single-blind parallel-group study with three measurement times; T0 at baseline, T1 after the intervention and T2 six months after T1. METHODS Patients between the ages of 18 and 60 with exercise intolerance and persistent PPCS (> 3 months) will be recruited to the study and randomized to two groups. All patients will receive follow-up at the outpatient TBI clinic. The intervention group will in addition receive SSTAE for 12 weeks with exercise diaries and a retest every 3 weeks for optimal dosage and progression. The Rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire will be the main outcome measure. The secondary outcome measure will be a test of exercise tolerance-the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test. Other outcome measures include the patient-specific functional scale that measures patient-specific activity limitations, as well as outcome measures for diagnosis-specific health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression, specific symptoms such as dizziness, headache and fatigue, and physical activity. DISCUSSION This study will add knowledge about the effect of SSTAE and whether it should be implemented in rehabilitation for the adult population with persistent PPCS after mTBI. The nested feasibility trial showed that the SSTAE intervention was safe and that the study procedures and delivery of the intervention overall were feasible. However, minor amendments to the study protocol were made prior to the commencement of the RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trials.gov, NCT05086419. Registered on September 5th, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars-Johan V Valaas
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Helene L Soberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mari S Rasmussen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sophie E Steenstrup
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingerid Kleffelgård
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Borgen IMH, Løvstad M, Hauger SL, Forslund MV, Kleffelgård I, Andelic N, Sveen U, Søberg HL, Sigurdardottir S, Winter L, Lindstad MØ, Brunborg C, Røe C. Effect of an Individually Tailored and Home-Based Intervention in the Chronic Phase of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2310821. [PMID: 37145600 PMCID: PMC10163390 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can cause long-lasting and heterogeneous difficulties that require an individually tailored approach to rehabilitation. However, high-quality studies of treatment options in the chronic phase of TBI are lacking. Objective To evaluate the effect of a home-based, individualized, and goal-oriented rehabilitation intervention in the chronic phase of TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants This study was an intention-to-treat parallel-group assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial with 1:1 randomization to an intervention or control group. Participants included adults in southeastern Norway who had sustained a TBI more than 2 years earlier, lived at home, and had ongoing TBI-related difficulties. A population-based sample of 555 individuals were invited, and 120 were included. Participants were assessed at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months after inclusion. Specialized rehabilitation therapists provided the intervention in patients' homes or via video conference and telephone. Data collection was conducted between June 5, 2018, and December 14, 2021. Interventions The intervention group received an 8-session individually tailored and goal-oriented rehabilitation program over 4 months. The control group received usual care in their municipality. Main Outcomes and Measures Preestablished primary outcomes were disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL; measured by the Quality of Life After Brain Injury [QOLIBRI] overall scale) and social participation (measured by the Participation Assessment With Recombined Tools-Objective [PART-O] social subscale). Preestablished secondary outcomes included generic HRQOL (measured by the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level [EQ-5D-5L] questionnaire), difficulty with TBI-related problem management (target outcomes; mean severity calculated across 3 main self-identified problem areas that were individually measured using a 4-point Likert scale), TBI symptoms (measured by the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire [RPQ]), psychological distress (depression and anxiety; measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item scale and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale [GAD-7], respectively), and functional competency (measured by the Patient Competency Rating Scale). Results Among 120 participants in the chronic phase of TBI, the median (IQR) age was 47.5 (31.0-55.8) years, and the median (IQR) time since injury was 4 (3-6) years; 85 (70.8%) were male. A total of 60 participants were randomized to the intervention group, and 60 were randomized to the control group. Between baseline and 12 months, no significant between-group effects were found for the primary outcomes of disease-specific HRQOL (QOLIBRI overall scale score: 2.82; 97.5% CI, -3.23 to 8.88; P = .30) or social participation (PART-O social subscale score: 0.12; 97.5% CI, -0.14 to 0.38; P = .29). At 12 months, the intervention group (n = 57) had significantly higher generic HRQOL (EQ-5D-5L score: 0.05; 95% CI, 0.002-0.10; P = .04) and fewer symptoms of TBI (RPQ total score: -3.54; 95% CI, -6.94 to -0.14; P = .04) and anxiety (GAD-7 score: -1.39; 95% CI, -2.60 to -0.19; P = .02) compared with the control group (n = 55). At 4 months only, the intervention group (n = 59) had significantly less difficulty managing TBI-related problems (target outcomes mean severity score: -0.46, 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.15; P = .003) compared with the control group (n = 59). No adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, no significant results were observed for the primary outcomes of disease-specific HRQOL or social participation. However, the intervention group reported improvements in secondary outcomes (generic HRQOL and symptoms of TBI and anxiety) that were maintained at 12-month follow-up. These findings suggest that rehabilitation interventions could help patients even in the chronic phase of TBI. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03545594.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida M. H. Borgen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Solveig L. Hauger
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Marit V. Forslund
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingerid Kleffelgård
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Unni Sveen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department for Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene L. Søberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Laraine Winter
- M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania
| | - Marte Ørud Lindstad
- Department of Health Sciences in Gjøvik, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Moksnes HØ, Schäfer C, Rasmussen MS, Søberg HL, Røise O, Anke A, Røe C, Næss PA, Gaarder C, Helseth E, Dahl HM, Hestnes M, Brunborg C, Andelic N, Hellstrøm T. Factors associated with discharge destination from acute care after moderate-to-severe traumatic injuries in Norway: a prospective population-based study. Inj Epidemiol 2023; 10:20. [PMID: 37055808 PMCID: PMC10099012 DOI: 10.1186/s40621-023-00431-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated that the trauma population has needs for rehabilitation services that are best provided in a continuous and coordinated way. The discharge destination after acute care is the second step to ensuring quality of care. There is a lack of knowledge regarding the factors associated with the discharge destination for the overall trauma population. This paper aims to identify sociodemographic, geographical, and injury-related factors associated with discharge destination following acute care at trauma centers for patients with moderate-to-severe traumatic injuries. METHODS A multicenter, population-based, prospective study was conducted with patients of all ages with traumatic injury [New Injury Severity Score (NISS) > 9] admitted within 72 h after the injury to regional trauma centers in southeastern and northern Norway over a 1-year period (2020). RESULTS In total, 601 patients were included; a majority (76%) sustained severe injuries, and 22% were discharged directly to specialized rehabilitation. Children were primarily discharged home, and most of the patients ≥ 65 years to their local hospital. Depending on the centrality of their residence [Norwegian Centrality Index (NCI) 1-6, where 1 is most central], we found that patients residing in NCI 3-4 and 5-6 areas sustained more severe injuries than patients residing in NCI 1-2 areas. An increase in the NISS, number of injuries, or a spinal injury with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3 was associated with discharge to local hospitals and specialized rehabilitation than to home. Patients with an AIS ≥ 3 head injury (RRR 6.1, 95% Confidence interval 2.80-13.38) were significantly more likely to be discharged to specialized rehabilitation than patients with a less severe head injury. Age < 18 years was negatively associated with discharge to a local hospital, while NCI 3-4, preinjury comorbidity, and increased severity of injuries in the lower extremities were positively associated. CONCLUSIONS Two-thirds of the patients sustained severe traumatic injury, and 22% were discharged directly to specialized rehabilitation. Age, centrality of the residence, preinjury comorbidity, injury severity, length of hospital stay, and the number and specific types of injuries were factors that had the greatest influence on discharge destination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Håkon Øgreid Moksnes
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
- Faculty of Medicine, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Christoph Schäfer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050, Langnes, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, P.O. Box 100, 9038, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Mari Storli Rasmussen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene Lundgaard Søberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, P.O. Box 4, St. Olavs Plass, 0130, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olav Røise
- Norwegian Trauma Registry, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
| | - Audny Anke
- Faculty of Medicine, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, P.O. Box 6050, Langnes, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, P.O. Box 100, 9038, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål Aksel Næss
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christine Gaarder
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Helseth
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Margrete Dahl
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Child Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Morten Hestnes
- Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Department of Research and Development, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Oslo University Hospital Trauma Registry, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1072, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
von Steinbuechel N, Hahm S, Muehlan H, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Bockhop F, Covic A, Schmidt S, Steyerberg EW, Maas AIR, Menon D, Andelic N, Zeldovich M. Impact of Sociodemographic, Premorbid, and Injury-Related Factors on Patient-Reported Outcome Trajectories after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12062246. [PMID: 36983247 PMCID: PMC10052290 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. To better understand its impact on various outcome domains, this study pursues the following: (1) longitudinal outcome assessments at three, six, and twelve months post-injury; (2) an evaluation of sociodemographic, premorbid, and injury-related factors, and functional recovery contributing to worsening or improving outcomes after TBI. Using patient-reported outcome measures, recuperation trends after TBI were identified by applying Multivariate Latent Class Mixed Models (MLCMM). Instruments were grouped into TBI-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL; QOLIBRI-OS, SF-12v2), and psychological and post-concussion symptoms (GAD-7, PHQ-9, PCL-5, RPQ). Multinomial logistic regressions were carried out to identify contributing factors. For both outcome sets, the four-class solution provided the best match between goodness of fit indices and meaningful clinical interpretability. Both models revealed similar trajectory classes: stable good health status (HRQoL: n = 1944; symptoms: n = 1963), persistent health impairments (HRQoL: n = 442; symptoms: n = 179), improving health status (HRQoL: n = 83; symptoms: n = 243), and deteriorating health status (HRQoL: n = 86; symptoms: n = 170). Compared to individuals with stable good health status, the other groups were more likely to have a lower functional recovery status at three months after TBI (i.e., the GOSE), psychological problems, and a lower educational attainment. Outcome trajectories after TBI show clearly distinguishable patterns which are reproducible across different measures. Individuals characterized by persistent health impairments and deterioration require special attention and long-term clinical monitoring and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole von Steinbuechel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Stefanie Hahm
- Department Health & Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Str. 13, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Holger Muehlan
- Department Health & Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Str. 13, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla
- Departments of Psychology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, 907 Floyd Ave., Richmond, VA 23284, USA
| | - Fabian Bockhop
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | - Amra Covic
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | - Silke Schmidt
- Department Health & Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Str. 13, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ewout W. Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew I. R. Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - David Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge/Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Box 157, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models, Faculty of Medicine, Univeristy of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dahl HM, Holthe IL, Løvstad M, Tverdal C, Andelic N, Myhre MC. Almost half of children and adolescents had unmet need 6 months after their traumatic brain injury. Acta Paediatr 2023; 112:1019-1028. [PMID: 36708075 DOI: 10.1111/apa.16693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
AIM Very few studies have focused on how children with traumatic brain injuries (TBI) access and use publicly funded healthcare and educational services. We aimed to compare the symptoms, recovery and service use of children with TBIs and a control group with other traumatic injuries. METHODS This case-control study was conducted at Oslo University Hospital, Norway, from 2015 to 2020. It focused on 49 patients aged 1-15 years who were hospitalised with TBIs and compared them with 51 matched patients with other traumatic injuries. Unmet needs were based on reports from parents, patients and clinicians 6 months after the injury. RESULTS Many children hospitalised after TBIs experienced persistent cognitive and emotional symptoms that effected their return to school and subsequent social interactions. These were associated with reduced quality of life. Nearly half (47%) of the children in the TBI group had unmet needs after 6 months, compared to 12% of the controls. Patients with TBIs also had more symptoms and showed less favourable recoveries than the controls. CONCLUSION Paediatric patients with TBIs had long-term cognitive and emotional symptoms that affected their return to school and social functioning. Almost half of them had unmet needs 6 months after their acute injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Margrete Dahl
- Dept. of Clinical Neurosciences for Children, Section for Child Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingvil Laberg Holthe
- Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Dept. of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Dept. of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Dept. of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Norway
| | | | - Nada Andelic
- Dept. of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services(CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mia C Myhre
- Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.,Dept. of Neonatal Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rasmussen MS, Howe EI, Andelic N, Soberg HL. Associations between protective resources and family functioning after traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study using a structural equation modeling approach. NeuroRehabilitation 2023; 52:47-58. [PMID: 36617761 PMCID: PMC9912729 DOI: 10.3233/nre-220131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A strength-based approach in the rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is recommended for patients and their families. However, further exploration of the complexity of individual and family factors is needed. OBJECTIVE To explore the associations between individual protective resources in patients and family members and the overall family functioning using a strength-based approach. METHODS Secondary analysis of data collected at baseline in a randomized controlled trial. Structural equation modeling with two latent constructs and six observed variables was performed. Outcome measures included the Resilience Scale for Adults, the Mental Component Summary (SF-36), the General Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale-IV. RESULTS Hundred and twenty-two participants (60 patients, 62 family members) with a mean age of 43 years were included at a median of 11 months post-injury. The final model demonstrated a strong covariance (coefficient = 0.61) between the latent Protective construct and Family functioning. Model-fit statistics indicated an acceptable fit to the data. CONCLUSION Higher levels of protective resources (resilience, self-efficacy, and mental HRQL) were positively associated with family functioning. These resources should be further assessed in patients and their families, to identify factors that can be strengthened through TBI rehabilitation intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari S. Rasmussen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie I. Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene L. Soberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Met - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fure SCR, Howe EI, Andelic N, Brunborg C, Olsen A, Rike PO, Spjelkavik Ø, Enehaug H, Røe C, Løvstad M. Workplace Factors Associated With Return to Work After Mild-to-Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2023; 38:E1-E9. [PMID: 35293367 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sociodemographic and injury-related predictors for return to work (RTW) after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) have been extensively explored. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding work-related predictors of RTW. The main aim of this study was to explore work-related predictors of work participation 6 and 12 months after mild-to-moderate TBI. SETTING Data were collected at baseline 8 to 12 weeks after injury, and 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline, at a specialized TBI rehabilitation outpatient clinic at Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. PARTICIPANTS Eligible patients had suffered a mild-to-moderate TBI 8 to 12 weeks previously, were employed 50% or more at time of injury, were between 18 and 60 years of age, and sick listed 50% or more at time of inclusion due to symptoms of TBI (based on the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire). In total, 116 patients were included in a randomized controlled trial, of whom 113 were included in the 1-year analysis. DESIGN Patients were originally included in a randomized controlled trial. There were no between-group differences in RTW after 1 year. Thus, the participants were evaluated as one cohort in this study. MAIN MEASURES The primary outcome measure was work participation 1 year after study inclusion. Work-related predictors were chosen on the basis of previous research and expert opinion and entered into a multivariable linear regression model. The model controlled for sociodemographic and injury-related factors. RESULTS The best-fitting model explained 25% of variation in work participation at 1 year. Significant predictors were predictability, quantitative demands and rewards (recognition) at the workplace, private or public employment, symptom burden at baseline, and sex. CONCLUSION In this study, several work-related predictors outperformed some of the established sociodemographic and injury-related predictors of RTW after TBI, thus stressing the need for further focus and research on amendable predictors of RTW after mild-to-moderate TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Christine Reistad Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Drs Fure, Howe, Andelic, and Røe), and Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services (Ms Brunborg), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society (Drs Fure, Andelic, and Røe), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Drs Howe and Røe), and Department of Psychology (Dr Løvstad), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway (Dr Olsen); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway (Dr Olsen); Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway (Drs Rike and Løvstad); Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway (Mr Spjelkavik and Dr Enehaug)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Howe EI, Zeldovich M, Andelic N, von Steinbuechel N, Fure SCR, Borgen IMH, Forslund MV, Hellstrøm T, Søberg HL, Sveen U, Rasmussen M, Kleffelgaard I, Tverdal C, Helseth E, Løvstad M, Lu J, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Tenovuo O, Azouvi P, Dawes H, Roe C. Rehabilitation and outcomes after complicated vs uncomplicated mild TBI: results from the CENTER-TBI study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1536. [PMID: 36527074 PMCID: PMC9758851 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08908-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite existing guidelines for managing mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), evidence-based treatments are still scarce and large-scale studies on the provision and impact of specific rehabilitation services are needed. This study aimed to describe the provision of rehabilitation to patients after complicated and uncomplicated mTBI and investigate factors associated with functional outcome, symptom burden, and TBI-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) up to six months after injury. METHODS Patients (n = 1379) with mTBI from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study who reported whether they received rehabilitation services during the first six months post-injury and who participated in outcome assessments were included. Functional outcome was measured with the Glasgow Outcome Scale - Extended (GOSE), symptom burden with the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ), and HRQOL with the Quality of Life after Brain Injury - Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS). We examined whether transition of care (TOC) pathways, receiving rehabilitation services, sociodemographic (incl. geographic), premorbid, and injury-related factors were associated with outcomes using regression models. For easy comparison, we estimated ordinal regression models for all outcomes where the scores were classified based on quantiles. RESULTS Overall, 43% of patients with complicated and 20% with uncomplicated mTBI reported receiving rehabilitation services, primarily in physical and cognitive domains. Patients with complicated mTBI had lower functional level, higher symptom burden, and lower HRQOL compared to uncomplicated mTBI. Rehabilitation services at three or six months and a higher number of TOC were associated with unfavorable outcomes in all models, in addition to pre-morbid psychiatric problems. Being male and having more than 13 years of education was associated with more favorable outcomes. Sustaining major trauma was associated with unfavorable GOSE outcome, whereas living in Southern and Eastern European regions was associated with lower HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS Patients with complicated mTBI reported more unfavorable outcomes and received rehabilitation services more frequently. Receiving rehabilitation services and higher number of care transitions were indicators of injury severity and associated with unfavorable outcomes. The findings should be interpreted carefully and validated in future studies as we applied a novel analytic approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02210221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Isager Howe
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- grid.411984.10000 0001 0482 5331Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Nada Andelic
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nicole von Steinbuechel
- grid.411984.10000 0001 0482 5331Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Silje C. R. Fure
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ida M. H. Borgen
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marit V. Forslund
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene L. Søberg
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ,grid.412414.60000 0000 9151 4445Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Unni Sveen
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ,grid.412414.60000 0000 9151 4445Department for Occupational Therapy Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mari Rasmussen
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingerid Kleffelgaard
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Tverdal
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Helseth
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway ,grid.416731.60000 0004 0612 1014Research Department, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Bjørnemyr, Norway
| | - Juan Lu
- grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway ,grid.224260.00000 0004 0458 8737Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Division of Epidemiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
| | | | - Olli Tenovuo
- grid.410552.70000 0004 0628 215XTurku Brain Injury Centre, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland ,grid.1374.10000 0001 2097 1371Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Philippe Azouvi
- grid.50550.350000 0001 2175 4109AP-HP, GH Paris-Saclay, Hospital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, France ,grid.7429.80000000121866389Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, UMR 1018, Team DevPsy, Paris, France
| | - Helen Dawes
- grid.8391.30000 0004 1936 8024College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK ,grid.451190.80000 0004 0573 576XOxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Cecilie Roe
- grid.55325.340000 0004 0389 8485Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway ,grid.5510.10000 0004 1936 8921Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Howe E, Andelic N, Fure SC, Løvstad M, Røe C, Aas E. Effect of a Combined Cognitive and Vocational Intervention on Change in HRQoL after TBI. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
|
24
|
Borgen IM, Løvstad M, Hauger SL, Forslund MV, Kleffelgård I, Andelic N, Sveen U, Søberg HL, Lindstad MØ, Winter L, Cecil. Effects of a Goal-Oriented and Home-Based Intervention in the Chronic Phase of Traumatic Brain Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
|
25
|
Spjelkavik Ø, Enehaug H, Klethagen P, Howe EI, Fure SC, Terjesen HCA, Løvstad M, Andelic N. Workplace accommodation in return to work after mild traumatic brain injury. Work 2022; 74:1149-1163. [PMID: 36442182 DOI: 10.3233/wor-211440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While a vast amount of research focuses on unmodifiable and individual factors that may impact return to work (RTW) for patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), less knowledge exists of the relationship between specific workplace factors and work retention. OBJECTIVE: Identify types of accommodation in the workplace that influence the RTW process for employees with TBI and the challenges associated with them. METHODS: A multiple case study consisting of 38 cases and 109 interviews of employees with TBI and their managers conducted between 2017 and 2020 at two time points. RESULTS: Accommodation of both the organizational and psychosocial work environment influences RTW for employees with TBI. Social support and supportive management may have positive and negative effects. RTW is often not a linear process. Over time, maintaining and developing customized accommodation in the work organization is challenging. CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty about accommodation in RTW for employees with TBI is closely linked to lack of knowledge in the workplace of how to handle complex and nonlinear RTW processes. Work-oriented rehabilitation should to a greater extent provide managers with relevant information and support to develop the person-environment fit over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heidi Enehaug
- Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål Klethagen
- Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C.R. Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
- Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Maas AIR, Menon DK, Manley GT, Abrams M, Åkerlund C, Andelic N, Aries M, Bashford T, Bell MJ, Bodien YG, Brett BL, Büki A, Chesnut RM, Citerio G, Clark D, Clasby B, Cooper DJ, Czeiter E, Czosnyka M, Dams-O’Connor K, De Keyser V, Diaz-Arrastia R, Ercole A, van Essen TA, Falvey É, Ferguson AR, Figaji A, Fitzgerald M, Foreman B, Gantner D, Gao G, Giacino J, Gravesteijn B, Guiza F, Gupta D, Gurnell M, Haagsma JA, Hammond FM, Hawryluk G, Hutchinson P, van der Jagt M, Jain S, Jain S, Jiang JY, Kent H, Kolias A, Kompanje EJO, Lecky F, Lingsma HF, Maegele M, Majdan M, Markowitz A, McCrea M, Meyfroidt G, Mikolić A, Mondello S, Mukherjee P, Nelson D, Nelson LD, Newcombe V, Okonkwo D, Orešič M, Peul W, Pisică D, Polinder S, Ponsford J, Puybasset L, Raj R, Robba C, Røe C, Rosand J, Schueler P, Sharp DJ, Smielewski P, Stein MB, von Steinbüchel N, Stewart W, Steyerberg EW, Stocchetti N, Temkin N, Tenovuo O, Theadom A, Thomas I, Espin AT, Turgeon AF, Unterberg A, Van Praag D, van Veen E, Verheyden J, Vyvere TV, Wang KKW, Wiegers EJA, Williams WH, Wilson L, Wisniewski SR, Younsi A, Yue JK, Yuh EL, Zeiler FA, Zeldovich M, Zemek R. Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:1004-1060. [PMID: 36183712 PMCID: PMC10427240 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00309-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 84.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has the highest incidence of all common neurological disorders, and poses a substantial public health burden. TBI is increasingly documented not only as an acute condition but also as a chronic disease with long-term consequences, including an increased risk of late-onset neurodegeneration. The first Lancet Neurology Commission on TBI, published in 2017, called for a concerted effort to tackle the global health problem posed by TBI. Since then, funding agencies have supported research both in high-income countries (HICs) and in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In November 2020, the World Health Assembly, the decision-making body of WHO, passed resolution WHA73.10 for global actions on epilepsy and other neurological disorders, and WHO launched the Decade for Action on Road Safety plan in 2021. New knowledge has been generated by large observational studies, including those conducted under the umbrella of the International Traumatic Brain Injury Research (InTBIR) initiative, established as a collaboration of funding agencies in 2011. InTBIR has also provided a huge stimulus to collaborative research in TBI and has facilitated participation of global partners. The return on investment has been high, but many needs of patients with TBI remain unaddressed. This update to the 2017 Commission presents advances and discusses persisting and new challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. In LMICs, the occurrence of TBI is driven by road traffic incidents, often involving vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists and pedestrians. In HICs, most TBI is caused by falls, particularly in older people (aged ≥65 years), who often have comorbidities. Risk factors such as frailty and alcohol misuse provide opportunities for targeted prevention actions. Little evidence exists to inform treatment of older patients, who have been commonly excluded from past clinical trials—consequently, appropriate evidence is urgently required. Although increasing age is associated with worse outcomes from TBI, age should not dictate limitations in therapy. However, patients injured by low-energy falls (who are mostly older people) are about 50% less likely to receive critical care or emergency interventions, compared with those injured by high-energy mechanisms, such as road traffic incidents. Mild TBI, defined as a Glasgow Coma sum score of 13–15, comprises most of the TBI cases (over 90%) presenting to hospital. Around 50% of adult patients with mild TBI presenting to hospital do not recover to pre-TBI levels of health by 6 months after their injury. Fewer than 10% of patients discharged after presenting to an emergency department for TBI in Europe currently receive follow-up. Structured follow-up after mild TBI should be considered good practice, and urgent research is needed to identify which patients with mild TBI are at risk for incomplete recovery. The selection of patients for CT is an important triage decision in mild TBI since it allows early identification of lesions that can trigger hospital admission or life-saving surgery. Current decision making for deciding on CT is inefficient, with 90–95% of scanned patients showing no intracranial injury but being subjected to radiation risks. InTBIR studies have shown that measurement of blood-based biomarkers adds value to previously proposed clinical decision rules, holding the potential to improve efficiency while reducing radiation exposure. Increased concentrations of biomarkers in the blood of patients with a normal presentation CT scan suggest structural brain damage, which is seen on MR scanning in up to 30% of patients with mild TBI. Advanced MRI, including diffusion tensor imaging and volumetric analyses, can identify additional injuries not detectable by visual inspection of standard clinical MR images. Thus, the absence of CT abnormalities does not exclude structural damage—an observation relevant to litigation procedures, to management of mild TBI, and when CT scans are insufficient to explain the severity of the clinical condition. Although blood-based protein biomarkers have been shown to have important roles in the evaluation of TBI, most available assays are for research use only. To date, there is only one vendor of such assays with regulatory clearance in Europe and the USA with an indication to rule out the need for CT imaging for patients with suspected TBI. Regulatory clearance is provided for a combination of biomarkers, although evidence is accumulating that a single biomarker can perform as well as a combination. Additional biomarkers and more clinical-use platforms are on the horizon, but cross-platform harmonisation of results is needed. Health-care efficiency would benefit from diversity in providers. In the intensive care setting, automated analysis of blood pressure and intracranial pressure with calculation of derived parameters can help individualise management of TBI. Interest in the identification of subgroups of patients who might benefit more from some specific therapeutic approaches than others represents a welcome shift towards precision medicine. Comparative-effectiveness research to identify best practice has delivered on expectations for providing evidence in support of best practices, both in adult and paediatric patients with TBI. Progress has also been made in improving outcome assessment after TBI. Key instruments have been translated into up to 20 languages and linguistically validated, and are now internationally available for clinical and research use. TBI affects multiple domains of functioning, and outcomes are affected by personal characteristics and life-course events, consistent with a multifactorial bio-psycho-socio-ecological model of TBI, as presented in the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) 2022 report. Multidimensional assessment is desirable and might be best based on measurement of global functional impairment. More work is required to develop and implement recommendations for multidimensional assessment. Prediction of outcome is relevant to patients and their families, and can facilitate the benchmarking of quality of care. InTBIR studies have identified new building blocks (eg, blood biomarkers and quantitative CT analysis) to refine existing prognostic models. Further improvement in prognostication could come from MRI, genetics, and the integration of dynamic changes in patient status after presentation. Neurotrauma researchers traditionally seek translation of their research findings through publications, clinical guidelines, and industry collaborations. However, to effectively impact clinical care and outcome, interactions are also needed with research funders, regulators, and policy makers, and partnership with patient organisations. Such interactions are increasingly taking place, with exemplars including interactions with the All Party Parliamentary Group on Acquired Brain Injury in the UK, the production of the NASEM report in the USA, and interactions with the US Food and Drug Administration. More interactions should be encouraged, and future discussions with regulators should include debates around consent from patients with acute mental incapacity and data sharing. Data sharing is strongly advocated by funding agencies. From January 2023, the US National Institutes of Health will require upload of research data into public repositories, but the EU requires data controllers to safeguard data security and privacy regulation. The tension between open data-sharing and adherence to privacy regulation could be resolved by cross-dataset analyses on federated platforms, with the data remaining at their original safe location. Tools already exist for conventional statistical analyses on federated platforms, however federated machine learning requires further development. Support for further development of federated platforms, and neuroinformatics more generally, should be a priority. This update to the 2017 Commission presents new insights and challenges across a range of topics around TBI: epidemiology and prevention (section 1 ); system of care (section 2 ); clinical management (section 3 ); characterisation of TBI (section 4 ); outcome assessment (section 5 ); prognosis (Section 6 ); and new directions for acquiring and implementing evidence (section 7 ). Table 1 summarises key messages from this Commission and proposes recommendations for the way forward to advance research and clinical management of TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew I R Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - David K Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mathew Abrams
- International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Åkerlund
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nada Andelic
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marcel Aries
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Tom Bashford
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael J Bell
- Critical Care Medicine, Neurological Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Neurology and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin L Brett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - András Büki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical School; ELKH-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group; and Neurotrauma Research Group, Janos Szentagothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Randall M Chesnut
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Citerio
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Universita Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- NeuroIntensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - David Clark
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Betony Clasby
- Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - D Jamie Cooper
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Endre Czeiter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical School; ELKH-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group; and Neurotrauma Research Group, Janos Szentagothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Marek Czosnyka
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kristen Dams-O’Connor
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Department of Neurology, Brain Injury Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Véronique De Keyser
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
- Department of Neurology and Center for Brain Injury and Repair, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ari Ercole
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas A van Essen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Éanna Falvey
- College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Adam R Ferguson
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anthony Figaji
- Division of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Sciences, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Brandon Foreman
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati Gardner Neuroscience Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Dashiell Gantner
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Guoyi Gao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
| | - Joseph Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Gravesteijn
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fabian Guiza
- Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Deepak Gupta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Centre and JPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Juanita A Haagsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Flora M Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gregory Hawryluk
- Section of Neurosurgery, GB1, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Peter Hutchinson
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mathieu van der Jagt
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sonia Jain
- Biostatistics Research Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Swati Jain
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ji-yao Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hope Kent
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Erwin J O Kompanje
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fiona Lecky
- Centre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research, Health Services Research Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hester F Lingsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc Maegele
- Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marek Majdan
- Institute for Global Health and Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Trnava University, Trnava, Slovakia
| | - Amy Markowitz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael McCrea
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Geert Meyfroidt
- Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ana Mikolić
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefania Mondello
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Pratik Mukherjee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Nelson
- Section for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lindsay D Nelson
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Virginia Newcombe
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Okonkwo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matej Orešič
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Wilco Peul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Dana Pisică
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennie Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Louis Puybasset
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Rahul Raj
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Chiara Robba
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genova, Italy, and Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonathan Rosand
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - David J Sharp
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Smielewski
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Murray B Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nicole von Steinbüchel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - William Stewart
- Department of Neuropathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Nino Stocchetti
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Milan University, and Neuroscience ICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Nancy Temkin
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, and Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Olli Tenovuo
- Department of Rehabilitation and Brain Trauma, Turku University Hospital, and Department of Neurology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Alice Theadom
- National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ilias Thomas
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Abel Torres Espin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexis F Turgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Andreas Unterberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominique Van Praag
- Departments of Clinical Psychology and Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Ernest van Veen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Thijs Vande Vyvere
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (MOVANT), Antwerp University Hospital, and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Kevin K W Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Eveline J A Wiegers
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - W Huw Williams
- Centre for Clinical Neuropsychology Research, Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Lindsay Wilson
- Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Stephen R Wisniewski
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander Younsi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - John K Yue
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Esther L Yuh
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Frederick A Zeiler
- Departments of Surgery, Human Anatomy and Cell Science, and Biomedical Engineering, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences and Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Roger Zemek
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sagstad K, Howe EI, Fure SCR, Løvstad M, Enehaug H, Ugelstad H, Feiring M, Andelic N, Sveen U. Transition back to work after mild TBI: a qualitative study. Scand J Occup Ther 2022; 30:527-538. [PMID: 36084237 DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2022.2120067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While many persons who sustain a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) can resume work shortly after their injury, some experience persisting symptoms leading to longer-term sickness absence. In-depth knowledge about how these persons experience the return to work (RTW) process is needed. AIMS To explore how persons with MTBI experience the process of returning to ordinary competitive work after a prolonged period of sickness absence. MATERIAL AND METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six persons (four women) approximately 12 months after sustaining an MTBI. Data were analysed using a stepwise-deductive inductive method. RESULTS When starting work the participants experienced a crisis. They described the importance of making the actual decision to RTW. Being present at the workplace was significant. In the process of increased workload, they expressed having challenges related to time perception and capacity restrictions. The importance of being seen and valued was emphasised. When reintegrated into the workplace revaluing work tasks and priorities shaped the RTW process as well as a further professional career. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE The process of RTW contained the experience of unpredictability and incompatibility with own identity and performance. Working had an impact on social participation, self-worth, daily structure, as well as reconstructing occupational biography.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjersti Sagstad
- Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Silje C R Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway.,Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Heidi Enehaug
- The Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene Ugelstad
- Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marte Feiring
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,The Work Research Institute, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Unni Sveen
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tverdal C, Brunborg C, Helseth E, Andelic N, Koch M, Røe C, Aarhus M, Hellstrøm T. Referrals to Early Specialized Rehabilitation after Traumatic Brain Injury During the Covid-19 Pandemic. J Rehabil Med 2022; 54:jrm00334. [PMID: 36083786 PMCID: PMC9554794 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To quantify potential changes in direct referral to early specialized rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic and the injury pattern of patients hospitalized with traumatic brain injury (TBI) at a level 1 trauma centre. Methods In this registry-based study, data were retrieved from the Oslo TBI Registry-Neurosurgery and included adult patients with injury-related intracranial findings admitted to Oslo University Hospital (OUH). The study focused on a period of time when OUH was in any level of preparedness because of the COVID-19 pandemic; March 2020 to August 2021. For comparison, the study used patients hospitalized for TBI in 2018 and 2019. Results A total of 1,310 hospitalized patients with TBI were divided into 2 groups; pre-pandemic and pandemic. Direct referral to early rehabilitation was maintained. Patient volume remained stable, and there were no differences between the groups regarding patient characteristics and acute management, although there was a significantly higher proportion of TBIs secondary to electric scooter accidents in the pandemic group. Results from univariable and multivariable logistic regression showed a multifaceted reality, but younger age, none or mild pre-injury comorbidity and severe disability due to TBI at discharge from acute care remained stable strong predictors of direct referral to rehabilitation. Conclusion For patients with moderate-severe TBI, the direct pathway to early specialized rehabilitation was maintained during 2020–21. However, the pandemic continued and the long-term impact for rehabilitation services is not yet known.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hauger SL, Borgen IMH, Løvstad M, Lu J, Forslund MV, Kleffelgård I, Andelic N, Røe C. Community-Based Interventions After Acquired Brain Injury-A Systematic Review of Intervention Types and Their Effectiveness. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2022; 37:E355-E369. [PMID: 35125426 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Comprehensive review of existing types and effectiveness of community-based interventions delivered to adults (mean age 18-65 years) with long-lasting (≥6 months) difficulties following acquired brain injury (ABI). DESIGN Systematic review of controlled intervention studies published until February 2021. MAIN MEASURES Systematic searches in databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects [Cochrane Library], and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [Cochrane Library]) and inclusion of English peer-reviewed full-text articles; randomized or controlled community-based intervention studies; sample size of 20 or more participants; and 3 or more intervention sessions. Two reviewers independently extracted data for the synthesis and assessed the methodological quality. Data extraction included study characteristics, demographics of participants, content and dose of intervention, outcome measures, and findings. RESULT The search returned 7386 publications, of which 49 eligible studies were included, revealing a diverse range of community-based interventions and a myriad of outcome measures applied for assessing functional capacities, participation, and quality of life in the chronic phase of ABI. Intervention types encompassed 14 holistic, 23 physical, and 12 specific interventions. A large heterogeneity regarding intervention frequency and intensity was found. Meta-analyses performed on the holistic, physical, and specific interventions did not indicate any significant pooled effects but showed highly variable effects between individuals, both in persons with traumatic and nontraumatic brain injuries. CONCLUSIONS Because of lack of pooled effects within types of community-based interventions, specific evidence-based recommendations within holistic, physical, and specific interventions designed to mitigate long-lasting ABI problems cannot be made. This review highlights the need for future studies to address methodological issues concerning larger sample size, lack of clear description interventions and comparator, missing reports of effects in change scores, need for consistent use of recommended outcome measures, and investigating the wide variety in intervention responsiveness among participants with ABI. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD42019124949).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solveig Lægreid Hauger
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway (Drs Hauger and Løvstad); Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences (Drs Hauger and Løvstad and Ms Borgen), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Dr Røe), and Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society (Dr Andelic), University of Oslo, Norway; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA (Dr Lu); and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Norway (Ms Borgen and Drs Forslund, Kleffelgård, Andelic, and Røe)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Borgen IMH, Kleffelgård I, Hauger SL, Forslund MV, Søberg HL, Andelic N, Sveen U, Winter L, Løvstad M, Røe C. Patient-Reported Problem Areas in Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2022; 37:E336-E345. [PMID: 34743086 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to (1) assess self-reported main problem areas reported by patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and their family members in the chronic phase, and (2) compare the self-prioritized problems with difficulties captured by questionnaires and neuropsychological screening through linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). SETTING Outpatient clinic at the Oslo University Hospital, Norway. PARTICIPANTS In total, 120 patients with TBI were recruited, of whom, 78 had a participating family member. Eligibility criteria were a clinical TBI diagnosis with verified intracranial injury, living at home, aged 18 to 72 years, 2 years or more postinjury, and experiencing perceived TBI-related difficulties, reduced physical and mental health, or difficulties with participation in everyday life. Patients with severe psychiatric or neurological disorders or inability to participate in goal-setting processes were excluded. DESIGN Cross-sectional. MAIN MEASURES Target Outcomes, that is, 3 main TBI-related problem areas reported by patients and family members, collected in a semistructured interview; standardized questionnaires of TBI-related symptoms, anxiety, depression, functioning, and health-related quality of life; neuropsychological screening battery. RESULTS Target Outcomes were related to cognitive, physical, emotional, and social difficulties. Target Outcomes were linked to 12 chapters and 112 distinct categories in the ICF, while standardized measures only covered 10 chapters and 28 categories. Some aspects of post-TBI adjustment were found to be insufficiently covered by the ICF classification, such as identity issues, lack of meaningful activities, and feeling lonely. CONCLUSION The Target Outcomes approach is a useful assessment method in a population with chronic TBI. The standardized questionnaires capture the spectrum of problems, whereas the Target Outcomes approach captures the prioritized individual problems hindering everyday life after TBI. While the standardized measures are an irreplaceable part of the assessment, Target Outcomes ensures patient involvement and may help clinicians better tailor relevant rehabilitation efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida M H Borgen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ms Borgen and Drs Kleffelgård, Forslund, Søberg, Andelic, Sveen, and Røe); Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences (Ms Borgen and Drs Hauger and Løvstad), Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine (Dr Røe), and Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society (Drs Andelic and Røe), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway (Drs Hauger and Løvstad); Departments of Physiotherapy (Dr Søberg) and Occupational Therapy Prosthetics and Orthotics (Dr Sveen), Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway; and M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania (Dr Winter)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
van der Vlegel M, Mikolić A, Lee Hee Q, Kaplan ZLR, Retel Helmrich IRA, van Veen E, Andelic N, Steinbuechel NV, Plass AM, Zeldovich M, Wilson L, Maas AIR, Haagsma JA, Polinder S. Health care utilization and outcomes in older adults after Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI study. Injury 2022; 53:2774-2782. [PMID: 35725508 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) is increasingly common in older adults aged ≥65 years, forming a growing public health problem. However, older adults are underrepresented in TBI research. Therefore, we aimed to provide an overview of health-care utilization, and of six-month outcomes after TBI and their determinants in older adults who sustained a TBI. METHODS We used data from the prospective multi-center Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. In-hospital and post-hospital health care utilization and outcomes were described for patients aged ≥65 years. Ordinal and linear regression analyses were performed to identify determinants of the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and mental health symptoms six-months post-injury. RESULTS Of 1254 older patients, 45% were admitted to an ICU with a mean length of stay of 9 days. Nearly 30% of the patients received inpatient rehabilitation. In total, 554/1254 older patients completed the six-month follow-up questionnaires. The mortality rate was 9% after mild and 60% after moderate/severe TBI, and full recovery based on GOSE was reported for 44% of patients after mild and 6% after moderate/severe TBI. Higher age and increased injury severity were primarily associated with functional impairment, while pre-injury systemic disease, psychiatric conditions and lower educational level were associated with functional impairment, lower generic and disease-specific HRQoL and mental health symptoms. CONCLUSION The rate of impairment and disability following TBI in older adults is substantial, and poorer outcomes across domains are associated with worse preinjury health. Nonetheless, a considerable number of patients fully or partially returns to their preinjury functioning. There should not be pessimism about outcomes in older adults who survive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein van der Vlegel
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands.
| | - Ana Mikolić
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| | - Quentin Lee Hee
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| | - Z L Rana Kaplan
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| | - Isabel R A Retel Helmrich
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| | - Ernest van Veen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands; Department of Intensive Care Adults, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Nicole V Steinbuechel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG)/ Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Anne Marie Plass
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG)/ Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG)/ Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Lindsay Wilson
- Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Andrew I R Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Juanita A Haagsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, Rotterdam, CA 3000, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Volovici V, Pisică D, Gravesteijn BY, Dirven CMF, Steyerberg EW, Ercole A, Stocchetti N, Nelson D, Menon DK, Citerio G, van der Jagt M, Maas AIR, Haitsma IK, Lingsma HF, Åkerlund C, Amrein K, Andelic N, Andreassen L, Audibert G, Azouvi P, Azzolini ML, Bartels R, Beer R, Bellander BM, Benali H, Berardino M, Beretta L, Beqiri E, Blaabjerg M, Lund SB, Brorsson C, Buki A, Cabeleira M, Caccioppola A, Calappi E, Calvi MR, Cameron P, Lozano GC, Castaño-León AM, Cavallo S, Chevallard G, Chieregato A, Coburn M, Coles J, Cooper JD, Correia M, Czeiter E, Czosnyka M, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Dark P, De Keyser V, Degos V, Corte FD, Boogert HD, Depreitere B, Dilvesi D, Dixit A, Dreier J, Dulière GL, Ezer E, Fabricius M, Foks K, Frisvold S, Furmanov A, Galanaud D, Gantner D, Ghuysen A, Giga L, Golubovic J, Gomez PA, Grossi F, Gupta D, Haitsma I, Helseth E, Hutchinson PJ, Jankowski S, Johnson F, Karan M, Kolias AG, Kondziella D, Koraropoulos E, Koskinen LO, Kovács N, Kowark A, Lagares A, Laureys S, Ledoux D, Lejeune A, Lightfoot R, Manara A, Martino C, Maréchal H, Mattern J, McMahon C, Menovsky T, Misset B, Muraleedharan V, Murray L, Negru A, Newcombe V, Nyirádi J, Ortolano F, Payen JF, Perlbarg V, Persona P, Piippo-Karjalainen A, Ples H, Pomposo I, Posti JP, Puybasset L, Radoi A, Ragauskas A, Raj R, Rhodes J, Richter S, Rocka S, Roe C, Roise O, Rosenfeld JV, Rosenlund C, Rosenthal G, Rossaint R, Rossi S, Sahuquillo J, Sandrød O, Sakowitz O, Sanchez-Porras R, Schirmer-Mikalsen K, Schou RF, Smielewski P, Sorinola A, Stamatakis E, Sundström N, Takala R, Tamás V, Tamosuitis T, Tenovuo O, Thomas M, Tibboel D, Tolias C, Trapani T, Tudora CM, Vajkoczy P, Vallance S, Valeinis E, Vámos Z, Van der Steen G, van Wijk RPJ, Vargiolu A, Vega E, Vik A, Vilcinis R, Vulekovic P, Williams G, Winzeck S, Wolf S, Younsi A, Zeiler FA, Ziverte A, Clusmann H, Voormolen D, van Dijck JTJM, van Essen TA. Comparative effectiveness of intracranial hypertension management guided by ventricular versus intraparenchymal pressure monitoring: a CENTER-TBI study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164:1693-1705. [PMID: 35648213 PMCID: PMC9233652 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05257-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare outcomes between patients with primary external ventricular device (EVD)-driven treatment of intracranial hypertension and those with primary intraparenchymal monitor (IP)-driven treatment. METHODS The CENTER-TBI study is a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational cohort study that enrolled patients of all TBI severities from 62 participating centers (mainly level I trauma centers) across Europe between 2015 and 2017. Functional outcome was assessed at 6 months and a year. We used multivariable adjusted instrumental variable (IV) analysis with "center" as instrument and logistic regression with covariate adjustment to determine the effect estimate of EVD on 6-month functional outcome. RESULTS A total of 878 patients of all TBI severities with an indication for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring were included in the present study, of whom 739 (84%) patients had an IP monitor and 139 (16%) an EVD. Patients included were predominantly male (74% in the IP monitor and 76% in the EVD group), with a median age of 46 years in the IP group and 48 in the EVD group. Six-month GOS-E was similar between IP and EVD patients (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval [CI] OR 0.74 and 95% CI [0.36-1.52], adjusted IV analysis). The length of intensive care unit stay was greater in the EVD group than in the IP group (adjusted rate ratio [95% CI] 1.70 [1.34-2.12], IV analysis). One hundred eighty-seven of the 739 patients in the IP group (25%) required an EVD due to refractory ICPs. CONCLUSION We found no major differences in outcomes of patients with TBI when comparing EVD-guided and IP monitor-guided ICP management. In our cohort, a quarter of patients that initially received an IP monitor required an EVD later for ICP control. The prevalence of complications was higher in the EVD group. PROTOCOL The core study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02210221, and the Resource Identification Portal (RRID: SCR_015582).
Collapse
|
33
|
Retel Helmrich IRA, van Klaveren D, Andelic N, Lingsma H, Maas A, Menon D, Polinder S, Røe C, Steyerberg EW, Van Veen E, Wilson L. Discrepancy between disability and reported well-being after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:jnnp-2021-326615. [PMID: 35537823 PMCID: PMC9279746 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following traumatic brain injury (TBI), the clinical focus is often on disability. However, patients' perceptions of well-being can be discordant with their disability level, referred to as the 'disability paradox'. We aimed to examine the relationship between disability and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following TBI, while taking variation in personal, injury-related and environment factors into account. METHODS We used data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury study. Disability was assessed 6 months post-injury by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). HRQoL was assessed by the SF-12v2 physical and mental component summary scores and the Quality of Life after Traumatic Brain Injury overall scale. We examined mean total and domain HRQoL scores by GOSE. We quantified variance in HRQoL explained by GOSE, personal, injury-related and environment factors with multivariable regression. RESULTS Six-month outcome assessments were completed in 2075 patients, of whom 78% had mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 13-15). Patients with severe disability had higher HRQoL than expected on the basis of GOSE alone, particularly after mild TBI. Up to 50% of patients with severe disability reported HRQoL scores within the normative range. GOSE, personal, injury-related and environment factors explained a limited amount of variance in HRQoL (up to 29%). CONCLUSION Contrary to the idea that discrepancies are unusual, many patients with poor functional outcomes reported well-being that was at or above the boundary considered satisfactory for the normative sample. These findings challenge the idea that satisfactory HRQoL in patients with disability should be described as 'paradoxical' and question common views of what constitutes 'unfavourable' outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies/Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nada Andelic
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Department of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hester Lingsma
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - David Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Department of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Ernest Van Veen
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Lindsay Wilson
- Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
van Essen TA, Lingsma HF, Pisică D, Singh RD, Volovici V, den Boogert HF, Younsi A, Peppel LD, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Ribbers GM, Walchenbach R, Menon DK, Hutchinson P, Depreitere B, Steyerberg EW, Maas AIR, de Ruiter GCW, Peul WC, Åkerlund C, Amrein K, Andelic N, Andreassen L, Anke A, Antoni A, Audibert G, Azouvi P, Azzolini ML, Bartels R, Barzó P, Beauvais R, Beer R, Bellander BM, Belli A, Benali H, Berardino M, Beretta L, Blaabjerg M, Bragge P, Brazinova A, Brinck V, Brooker J, Brorsson C, Buki A, Bullinger M, Cabeleira M, Caccioppola A, Calappi E, Calvi MR, Cameron P, Carbayo Lozano G, Carbonara M, Castaño-León AM, Cavallo S, Chevallard G, Chieregato A, Citerio G, Clusmann H, Coburn MS, Coles J, Cooper JD, Correia M, Čović A, Curry N, Czeiter E, Czosnyka M, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Dark P, Dawes H, De Keyser V, Degos V, Della Corte F, Đilvesi Đ, Dixit A, Donoghue E, Dreier J, Dulière GL, Ercole A, Esser P, Ezer E, Fabricius M, Feigin VL, Foks K, Frisvold S, Furmanov A, Gagliardo P, Galanaud D, Gantner D, Gao G, George P, Ghuysen A, Giga L, Glocker B, Golubović J, Gomez PA, Gratz J, Gravesteijn B, Grossi F, Gruen RL, Gupta D, Haagsma JA, Haitsma I, Helbok R, Helseth E, Horton L, Huijben J, Jacobs B, Jankowski S, Jarrett M, Jiang JY, Johnson F, Jones K, Karan M, Kolias AG, Kompanje E, Kondziella D, Kornaropoulos E, Koskinen LO, Kovács N, Lagares A, Lanyon L, Laureys S, Lecky F, Ledoux D, Lefering R, Legrand V, Lejeune A, Levi L, Lightfoot R, Maegele M, Majdan M, Manara A, Manley G, Maréchal H, Martino C, Mattern J, McMahon C, Melegh B, Menovsky T, Mikolic A, Misset B, Muraleedharan V, Murray L, Nair N, Negru A, Nelson D, Newcombe V, Nieboer D, Nyirádi J, Oresic M, Ortolano F, Otesile O, Palotie A, Parizel PM, Payen JF, Perera N, Perlbarg V, Persona P, Piippo-Karjalainen A, Pirinen M, Ples H, Polinder S, Pomposo I, Posti JP, Puybasset L, Rădoi A, Ragauskas A, Raj R, Rambadagalla M, Rehorčíková V, Retel Helmrich I, Rhodes J, Richardson S, Richter S, Ripatti S, Rocka S, Roe C, Roise O, Rosand J, Rosenfeld J, Rosenlund C, Rosenthal G, Rossaint R, Rossi S, Rueckert D, Rusnák M, Sahuquillo J, Sakowitz O, Sanchez-Porras R, Sandor J, Schäfer N, Schmidt S, Schoechl H, Schoonman G, Schou RF, Schwendenwein E, Sewalt C, Skandsen T, Smielewski P, Sorinola A, Stamatakis E, Stanworth S, Kowark A, Stevens R, Stewart W, Stocchetti N, Sundström N, Takala R, Tamás V, Tamosuitis T, Taylor MS, Te Ao B, Tenovuo O, Theadom A, Thomas M, Tibboel D, Timmers M, Tolias C, Trapani T, Tudora CM, Unterberg A, Vajkoczy P, Valeinis E, Vallance S, Vámos Z, Van der Jagt M, van der Naalt J, Van der Steen G, van Dijck JT, Van Hecke W, van Heugten C, Van Praag D, Van Veen E, van Wijk R, Vande Vyvere T, Vargiolu A, Vega E, Velt K, Verheyden J, Vespa PM, Vik A, Vilcinis R, von Steinbüchel N, Voormolen D, Vulekovic P, Wang KK, Wiegers E, Williams G, Wilson L, Winzeck S, Wolf S, Yang Z, Ylén P, Zeiler FA, Ziverte A, Zoerle T. Surgery versus conservative treatment for traumatic acute subdural haematoma: a prospective, multicentre, observational, comparative effectiveness study. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:620-631. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00166-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
35
|
Røe C, Bautz-Holter E, Andelic N, Søberg HL, Nugraha B, Gutenbrunner C, Boekel A, Kirkevold M, Engen G, Lu J. Organization of rehabilitation services in randomized controlled trials - which factors influence functional outcome? A systematic review. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2022; 4:100197. [PMID: 35756983 PMCID: PMC9214333 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify factors related to the organization of rehabilitation services that may influence patients’ functional outcome and make recommendations for categories to be used in the reporting of rehabilitation interventions. Data Sources A systematic review based on a search in MEDLINE indexed journals (MEDLINE [OVID], Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) until June 2019. Study Selection In total 8587 candidate randomized controlled trials reporting on organizational factors of multidisciplinary rehabilitation interventions and their associations with functional outcome. An additional 1534 trials were identified from June 2019 to March 2021. Data Extraction: Quality evaluation was conducted by 2 independent researchers. The organizational factors were classified according to the International Classification for Service Organization in Health-related Rehabilitation 2.0. Data Synthesis In total 80 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was a great heterogeneity in the terminology and reporting of service organization across all studies. Aspects of Settings including the Mode of Service Delivery was the most explicitly analyzed organizational category (44 studies). The importance of the integration of rehabilitation in the inpatient services was supported. Furthermore, several studies documented a lack of difference in outcome between outpatient vs inpatient service delivery. Patient Centeredness, Integration of Care, and Time and Intensity factors were also analyzed, but heterogeneity of interventions in these studies prohibited aggregation of results. Conclusions Settings and in particular the way the services were delivered to the users influenced functional outcome. Hence, it should be compulsory to include a standardized reporting of aspects of service delivery in clinical trials. We would also advise further standardization in the description of organizational factors in rehabilitation interventions to build knowledge of effective service organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Røe
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Corresponding author Cecilie Røe, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, P.O. Box 1089, Blidern, 0319 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Erik Bautz-Holter
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene Lundgaard Søberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Boya Nugraha
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | | | - Andrea Boekel
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Marit Kirkevold
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Grace Engen
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Juan Lu
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Division of Epidemiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Soberg HL, Moksnes HØ, Anke A, Røise O, Røe C, Aas E, Sveen U, Gaarder C, Næss PA, Helseth E, Dahl HM, Becker F, Løvstad M, Bartnes K, Schäfer C, Rasmusssen MS, Perrin P, Lu J, Hellstrøm T, Andelic N. Correction: Rehabilitation Needs, Service Provision, and Costs in the First Year Following Traumatic Injuries: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e37723. [PMID: 35320112 PMCID: PMC8987964 DOI: 10.2196/37723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/25980.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene Lundgaard Soberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Håkon Øgreid Moksnes
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Audny Anke
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Olav Røise
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eline Aas
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Unni Sveen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Christine Gaarder
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål Aksel Næss
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Traumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Helseth
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Margrete Dahl
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Child Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Frank Becker
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway.,Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristian Bartnes
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Christoph Schäfer
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Mari S Rasmusssen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paul Perrin
- Departments of Psychology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Juan Lu
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models & Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nugraha B, Engen G, Roe C, Kirkevold M, Soberg HL, Andelic N, Gutenbrunner C. The development of a minimum reporting set of contextual factors for rehabilitation studies. J Rehabil Med 2022; 54:jrm00265. [PMID: 35174867 PMCID: PMC9131192 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify the most important categories of the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R 2.0) for a minimum reporting data set. Methods A 2-step Delphi survey was used. Rehabilitation experts from all world regions including physicians, nurses, neuropsychologists, physiotherapists, and others, were invited to participate. In the first round, all participants were asked to rate the categories and subcategories of the ICSO-R 2.0 with the following criteria: Being relevant for study outcomes; Being distinctive among different rehabilitation settings; Being feasible to use and reported by objective figures or other clear characterization. All categories that were rated relevant, distinctive and feasible by more than 60% of respondents from the first round were included in the second round. Results The most important and relevant factors for the minimum reporting set in rehabilitation services regarding the provider were: human resources, context, technical resources, quality assurance and management, location of provider, and ownership. Regarding the service delivery, the most important and relevant factors were: target group, rehabilitation team, aspect of time and intensity, setting, location of service delivery, modes of referral, facility and reporting and documentation. Conclusion Several categories were identified, and reduction in these through discussions and iterative voting at workshops and consensus conferences is needed before finalizing the reporting set.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boya Nugraha
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, 30625-Hannover, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hellstrøm T, Andelic N, Holthe ØØ, Helseth E, Server A, Eiklid K, Sigurdardottir S. APOE-ε4 Is Associated With Reduced Verbal Memory Performance and Higher Emotional, Cognitive, and Everyday Executive Function Symptoms Two Months After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Front Neurol 2022; 13:735206. [PMID: 35250800 PMCID: PMC8888909 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.735206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Substantial variance exists in outcomes after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI), and these differences are not fully explained by injury characteristics or severity. Genetic factors are likely to play a role in this variance. Objectives The aim of this study was to examine associations between the apolipoprotein (APOE)-ε4 allele and memory measures at two months post-MTBI and to evaluate whether subjective cognitive and affective symptoms were associated with APOE-ε4 status. Based on previous research, it was hypothesized that APOE-ε4 carriers would show poorer verbal memory performance compared to APOE-ε4 non-carriers. Methods Neuropsychological data at two months post-injury and blood samples that could be used to assess APOE genotype were available for 134 patients with MTBI (mean age 39.2 years, 62% males, 37% APOE-ε4 carriers). All patients underwent computed tomography at hospital admission and magnetic resonance imaging four weeks post-injury. Results The APOE-ε4 + status was associated with decreased immediate memory recall (p = 0.036; β = −0.10, 95% CI [−0.19, −0.01]). Emotional, cognitive, and everyday executive function symptoms at two months post-injury were significantly higher in APOE-ε4 carriers compared to non-carriers. Conclusion The APOE-ε4+ allele has a negative effect on verbal memory and symptom burden two months after MTBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- *Correspondence: Torgeir Hellstrøm
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvor Øistensen Holthe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Helseth
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andres Server
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin Eiklid
- Department of Medical Genetic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Borgen IMH, Hauger SL, Forslund MV, Kleffelgård I, Brunborg C, Andelic N, Sveen U, Søberg HL, Sigurdardottir S, Røe C, Løvstad M. Goal Attainment in an Individually Tailored and Home-Based Intervention in the Chronic Phase after Traumatic Brain Injury. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11040958. [PMID: 35207231 PMCID: PMC8875324 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11040958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a heterogeneous condition with long-term consequences for individuals and families. Goal-oriented rehabilitation is often applied, but there is scarce knowledge regarding types of goals and goal attainment. This study describes goal attainment in persons in the chronic phase of TBI who have received an individualized, SMART goal-oriented and home-based intervention, compares goal attainment in different functional domains, and examines indicators of goal attainment. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) was recorded in the intervention group (n = 59) at the final session. The goal attainment was high, with 93.3% increased goal attainment across all goals at the final session. The level of goal attainment was comparable across domains (cognitive, physical/somatic, emotional, social). Gender, anxiety symptoms, self-reported executive dysfunction, and therapy expectations were indicators of goal attainment. These results indicate a potential for the high level of goal attainment in the chronic phase of TBI. Tailoring of rehabilitation to address individual needs for home-dwelling persons with TBI in the chronic phase represents an important area of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida M. H. Borgen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (U.S.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.)
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway; (S.L.H.); (M.L.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Solveig L. Hauger
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway; (S.L.H.); (M.L.)
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Marit V. Forslund
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (U.S.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Ingerid Kleffelgård
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (U.S.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.)
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (U.S.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.)
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Unni Sveen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (U.S.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.)
- Department for Occupational Therapy Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene L. Søberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (U.S.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.)
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway; (M.V.F.); (I.K.); (N.A.); (U.S.); (H.L.S.); (C.R.)
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, 0316 Oslo, Norway; (S.L.H.); (M.L.)
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, 1453 Nesoddtangen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Løke D, Løvstad M, Andelic N, Andersson S, Ystrom E, Vassend O. The role of pain and psychological distress in fatigue: a co-twin and within-person analysis of confounding and causal relations. Health Psychol Behav Med 2022; 10:160-179. [PMID: 35173998 PMCID: PMC8843118 DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2022.2033121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Løke
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen-Bjornemyr, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen-Bjornemyr, Norway
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Stein Andersson
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Psychosomatic and CL Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eivind Ystrom
- Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
- PROMENTA Research Center, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olav Vassend
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Holthe IL, Dahl HM, Rohrer-Baumgartner N, Eichler S, Elseth MF, Holthe Ø, Berntsen T, Yeates KO, Andelic N, Løvstad M. Neuropsychological Impairment, Brain Injury Symptoms, and Health-Related Quality of Life After Pediatric TBI in Oslo. Front Neurol 2022; 12:719915. [PMID: 35153967 PMCID: PMC8831895 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.719915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Descriptions of clinical outcomes in pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI) in Scandinavia are sparse. The Oslo site of the European CENTER-TBI study has performed a pTBI outcome study in a hospitalized population. The main objective was to investigate neuropsychological outcomes, self- and parent-reported symptoms associated with brain injury, and quality of life in children aged 1–15 years, 5–8 months after injury. Fifty-two children were included, and 45 completed the assessments. The sample consisted of 15.4% severe, 21.2% moderate, and 63.4% mild TBI. Subjectively experienced problems with concentration and fatigue were reported by the parents of nearly half of the children. Higher brain injury symptom load was associated with lower quality of life, but was unrelated to injury severity. Group average scores of the sample on neuropsychological testing appeared unimpaired relative to normative means aside from lower performance in working memory. However, based on an impairment index (i.e., 2 or more tests being >1.5 SD below the normative mean), the presence of weak cognitive performance was evident in as many as 45.4% of the sample. Two-thirds of the sample also showed abnormally large intraindividual variability in cognitive functioning (i.e., significant WISC-IV index discrepancies). The findings highlight the need to look beyond group averages on neuropsychological testing. Utilizing an impairment index and considering intraindividual performance variability conveyed deficits that may warrant clinical follow-up. The association of brain injury symptoms with quality of life but not injury severity emphasizes the need to consider symptoms after TBI within a biopsychosocial framework. Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT02210221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingvil Laberg Holthe
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- *Correspondence: Ingvil Laberg Holthe
| | - Hilde Margrete Dahl
- Section for Child Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences for Children, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Sandra Eichler
- Department of Traumatic Brain Injury, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway
| | | | - Øyvor Holthe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torhild Berntsen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Keith Owen Yeates
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute and Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tverdal C, Aarhus M, Rønning P, Skaansar O, Skogen K, Andelic N, Helseth E. Incidence of emergency neurosurgical TBI procedures: a population-based study. BMC Emerg Med 2022; 22:1. [PMID: 34991477 PMCID: PMC8734328 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-021-00561-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rates of emergency neurosurgery in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients vary between populations and trauma centers. In planning acute TBI treatment, knowledge about rates and incidence of emergency neurosurgery at the population level is of importance for organization and planning of specialized health care services. This study aimed to present incidence rates and patient characteristics for the most common TBI-related emergency neurosurgical procedures. METHODS Oslo University Hospital is the only trauma center with neurosurgical services in Southeast Norway, which has a population of 3 million. We extracted prospectively collected registry data from the Oslo TBI Registry - Neurosurgery over a five-year period (2015-2019). Incidence was calculated in person-pears (crude) and age-adjusted for standard population. We conducted multivariate multivariable logistic regression models to assess variables associated with emergency neurosurgical procedures. RESULTS A total of 2151 patients with pathological head CT scans were included. One or more emergency neurosurgical procedure was performed in 27% of patients. The crude incidence was 3.9/100,000 person-years. The age-adjusted incidences in the standard population for Europe and the world were 4.0/100,000 and 3.3/100,000, respectively. The most frequent emergency neurosurgical procedure was the insertion of an intracranial pressure monitor, followed by evacuation of the mass lesion. Male sex, road traffic accidents, severe injury (low Glasgow coma score) and CT characteristics such as midline shift and compressed/absent basal cisterns were significantly associated with an increased probability of emergency neurosurgery, while older age was associated with a decreased probability. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of emergency neurosurgery in the general population is low and reflects neurosurgery procedures performed in patients with severe injuries. Hence, emergency neurosurgery for TBIs should be centralized to major trauma centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathrine Tverdal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P. O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Boks 1072 Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Mads Aarhus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P. O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pål Rønning
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P. O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ola Skaansar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P. O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Boks 1072 Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karoline Skogen
- Department of Neuroradiology, Oslo University Hospital, P. O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, P. O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Boks 1072 Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Helseth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P. O. Box 4956 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Boks 1072 Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Van Praag DL, Wouters K, Van Den Eede F, Wilson L, Maas AI, Åkerlund C, Amrein K, Andelic N, Andreassen L, Anke A, Antoni A, Audibert G, Azouvi P, Azzolini ML, Bartels R, Barzó P, Beauvais R, Beer R, Bellander BM, Belli A, Benali H, Berardino M, Beretta L, Blaabjerg M, Bragge P, Brazinova A, Brinck V, Brooker J, Brorsson C, Buki A, Bullinger M, Cabeleira M, Caccioppola A, Calappi E, Calvi MR, Cameron P, Lozano GC, Carbonara M, Cavallo S, Chevallard G, Chieregato A, Citerio G, Ceyisakar I, Clusmann H, Coburn M, Coles J, Cooper JD, Correia M, Čović A, Curry N, Czeiter E, Czosnyka M, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Dark P, Dawes H, De Keyser V, Degos V, Della Corte F, Boogert HD, Depreitere B, Đilvesi Đ, Dixit A, Donoghue E, Dreier J, Dulière GL, Ercole A, Esser P, Ezer E, Fabricius M, Feigin VL, Foks K, Frisvold S, Furmanov A, Gagliardo P, Galanaud D, Gantner D, Gao G, George P, Ghuysen A, Giga L, Glocker B, Golubovic J, Gomez PA, Gratz J, Gravesteijn B, Grossi F, Gruen RL, Gupta D, Haagsma JA, Haitsma I, Helbok R, Helseth E, Horton L, Huijben J, Hutchinson PJ, Jacobs B, Jankowski S, Jarrett M, Jiang JY, Johnson F, Jones K, Karan M, Kolias AG, Kompanje E, Kondziella D, Koraropoulos E, Koskinen LO, Kovács N, Kowark A, Lagares A, Lanyon L, Laureys S, Lecky F, Ledoux D, Lefering R, Legrand V, Lejeune A, Levi L, Lightfoot R, Lingsma H, Maas AI, Castaño-León AM, Maegele M, Majdan M, Manara A, Manley G, Martino C, Maréchal H, Mattern J, McMahon C, Melegh B, Menon D, Menovsky T, Mikolic A, Misset B, Muraleedharan V, Murray L, Negru A, Nelson D, Newcombe V, Nieboer D, Nyirádi J, Olubukola O, Oresic M, Ortolano F, Palotie A, Parizel PM, Payen JF, Perera N, Perlbarg V, Persona P, Peul W, Piippo-Karjalainen A, Pirinen M, Ples H, Polinder S, Pomposo I, Posti JP, Puybasset L, Radoi A, Ragauskas A, Raj R, Rambadagalla M, Rhodes J, Richardson S, Richter S, Ripatti S, Rocka S, Roe C, Roise O, Rosand J, Rosenfeld JV, Rosenlund C, Rosenthal G, Rossaint R, Rossi S, Rueckert D, Rusnák M, Sahuquillo J, Sakowitz O, Sanchez-Porras R, Sandor J, Schäfer N, Schmidt S, Schoechl H, Schoonman G, Schou RF, Schwendenwein E, Sewalt C, Skandsen T, Smielewski P, Sorinola A, Stamatakis E, Stanworth S, Stevens R, Stewart W, Steyerberg EW, Stocchetti N, Sundström N, Synnot A, Takala R, Tamás V, Tamosuitis T, Taylor MS, Ao BT, Tenovuo O, Theadom A, Thomas M, Tibboel D, Timmers M, Tolias C, Trapani T, Tudora CM, Unterberg A, Vajkoczy P, Vallance S, Valeinis E, Vámos Z, van der Jagt M, Van der Steen G, van der Naalt J, van Dijck JT, van Essen TA, Van Hecke W, van Heugten C, Van Praag D, Vyvere TV, van Wijk RP, Vargiolu A, Vega E, Velt K, Verheyden J, Vespa PM, Vik A, Vilcinis R, Volovici V, von Steinbüchel N, Voormolen D, Vulekovic P, Wang KK, Wiegers E, Williams G, Wilson L, Winzeck S, Wolf S, Yang Z, Ylén P, Younsi A, Zeiler FA, Zelinkova V, Ziverte A, Zoerle T. Neurocognitive correlates of probable posttraumatic stress disorder following traumatic brain injury. Brain and Spine 2022; 2:100854. [PMID: 36248103 PMCID: PMC9560676 DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2021.100854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Neurocognitive problems associated with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can interact with impairment resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI). Research question We aimed to identify neurocognitive problems associated with probable PTSD following TBI in a civilian sample. Material and methods The study is part of the CENTER-TBI project (Collaborative European Neurotrauma Effectiveness Research) that aims to better characterize TBI. For this cross-sectional study, we included patients of all severities aged over 15, and a Glasgow Outcome Score Extended (GOSE) above 3. Participants were assessed at six months post-injury on the PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5), the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Primary analysis was a complete case analysis. Regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between the PCL-5 and cognition. Results Of the 1134 participants included in the complete case analysis, 13.5% screened positive for PTSD. Probable PTSD was significantly associated with higher TMT-(B-A) (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.14–1.60, p < .001) and lower RAVLT-delayed recall scores (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61–0.91, p = .004) after controlling for age, sex, psychiatric history, baseline Glasgow Coma Scale and education. Discussion and conclusion Poorer performance on cognitive tests assessing task switching and, to a lesser extent, delayed verbal recall is associated with probable PTSD in civilians who have suffered TBI. Six months after traumatic brain injury 13.5% of people screen positive for PTSD. Task switching performance and verbal memory are related to probable PTSD. PTSD severity is related to processing speed and task switching performance.
Collapse
|
44
|
Wang B, Zeldovich M, Rauen K, Wu YJ, Covic A, Muller I, Haagsma JA, Polinder S, Menon D, Asendorf T, Andelic N, von Steinbuechel N. Longitudinal Analyses of the Reciprocity of Depression and Anxiety after Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Clinical Implications. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235597. [PMID: 34884299 PMCID: PMC8658198 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Depression and anxiety are common following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Understanding their prevalence and interplay within the first year after TBI with differing severities may improve patients' outcomes after TBI. Individuals with a clinical diagnosis of TBI recruited for the large European collaborative longitudinal study CENTER-TBI were screened for patient-reported major depression (MD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) at three, six, and twelve months post-injury (N = 1683). Data were analyzed using autoregressive cross-lagged models. Sociodemographic, premorbid and injury-related factors were examined as risk factors. 14.1-15.5% of TBI patients reported moderate to severe MD at three to twelve months after TBI, 7.9-9.5% reported GAD. Depression and anxiety after TBI presented high within-domain persistency and cross-domain concurrent associations. MD at three months post-TBI had a significant impact on GAD at six months post-TBI, while both acted bidirectionally at six to twelve months post-TBI. Being more severely disabled, having experienced major extracranial injuries, an intensive care unit stay, and being female were risk factors for more severe MD and GAD. Major trauma and the level of consciousness after TBI were additionally associated with more severe MD, whereas being younger was related to more severe GAD. Individuals after TBI should be screened and treated for MD and GAD early on, as both psychiatric disturbances are highly persistent and bi-directional in their impact. More severely disabled patients are particularly vulnerable, and thus warrant timely screening and intensive follow-up treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biyao Wang
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany; (M.Z.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (I.M.); (N.v.S.)
- Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany; (M.Z.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (I.M.); (N.v.S.)
| | - Katrin Rauen
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatric Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Minervastrasse 145, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland;
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Feodor-Lynen-Straße 17, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Yi-Jhen Wu
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany; (M.Z.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (I.M.); (N.v.S.)
| | - Amra Covic
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany; (M.Z.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (I.M.); (N.v.S.)
| | - Isabelle Muller
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany; (M.Z.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (I.M.); (N.v.S.)
| | - Juanita A. Haagsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (S.P.)
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (J.A.H.); (S.P.)
| | - David Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge/Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Box 157, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;
| | - Thomas Asendorf
- Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Goettingen, 37073 Goettingen, Germany;
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway;
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Nicole von Steinbuechel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany; (M.Z.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (I.M.); (N.v.S.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Fure SCR, Howe EI, Spjelkavik Ø, Røe C, Rike PO, Olsen A, Ponsford J, Andelic N, Løvstad M. Post-concussion symptoms three months after mild-to-moderate TBI: characteristics of sick-listed patients referred to specialized treatment and consequences of intracranial injury. Brain Inj 2021; 35:1054-1064. [PMID: 34314269 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1953593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To present pre-injury, injury-related, work-related and post-injury characteristics, and to compare patients with and without traumatic intracranial abnormalities, in a treatment-seeking sample with persistent post-concussion symptoms (PPCS) after mild-to-moderate TBI.Methods: Cross-sectional design in the context of a specialized TBI outpatient clinic. Eligible patients were aged 18-60 years, employed ≥ 50% at time of injury, and sick listed ≥ 50% at inclusion due to PPCS. Data were collected 8-12 weeks after injury through review of medical records, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, and neuropsychological screening.Results: The study included 116 patients, of whom 60% were women, and predominantly white-collar workers in full-time positions. Ninety-four percent had a mild TBI, and 23% had intracranial abnormalities. The full sample reported high somatic, emotional, and cognitive symptom burden, and decreased health-related quality of life. Patients with normal CT/MRI results reported higher overall symptom burden, while patients with intracranial abnormalities had worse memory function.Conclusion: Injury severity and traumatic intracranial radiological findings should not be the sole ground for planning of rehabilitation service provision in patients with PPCS, as subjective complaints do not necessarily co-vary with these variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Christine Reistad Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per-Ola Rike
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Alexander Olsen
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jennie Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway.,Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Borgen IMH, Røe C, Brunborg C, Tenovuo O, Azouvi P, Dawes H, Majdan M, Ranta J, Rusnak M, Wiegers EJA, Tverdal C, Jacob L, Cogné M, von Steinbuechel N, Andelic N. Care transitions in the first 6months following traumatic brain injury: Lessons from the CENTER-TBI study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 64:101458. [PMID: 33246186 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No large international studies have investigated care transitions during or after acute hospitalisations for traumatic brain injury (TBI). OBJECTIVES To characterise various TBI-care pathways and the number of associated transitions during the first 6 months after TBI and to assess the impact of these on functional TBI outcome controlled for demographic and injury-related factors. METHODS This was a cohort study of patients with TBI admitted to various trauma centres enrolled in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study. Number of transitions and specific care pathways were identified. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of number of transitions and care pathways on functional outcome at 6 months post-injury as assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). RESULTS In total, 3133 patients survived the acute TBI-care pathway and had at least one documented in-hospital transition at 6-month follow-up. The median number of transitions was 3 (interquartile range 2-3). The number of transitions did not predict functional outcome at 6 months (odds ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.18; P=0.063). A total of 378 different care pathways were identified; 8 were identical for at least 100 patients and characterized as "common pathways". Five of these common care pathways predicted better functional outcomes at 6 months, and the remaining 3 pathways were unrelated to outcome. In both models, increased age, violence as the cause of injury, pre-injury presence of systemic disease, both intracranial and overall injury severity, and regions of Southern/Eastern Europe were associated with unfavourable functional outcomes at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS A high number of different and complex care pathways was found for patients with TBI, particularly those with severe injuries. This high number and variety of care pathway possibilities indicates a need for standardisation and development of "common data elements for TBI care pathways" for future studies. STUDY REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02210221.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida M H Borgen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olli Tenovuo
- Turku Brain Injury Centre, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Philippe Azouvi
- AP-HP, GH Paris-Saclay, Hopital Raymond Poincaré, Garches and Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Team DevPsy, 94807 Villejuif, France
| | - Helen Dawes
- Oxford Brookes University, health and life sciences, Oxford, UK
| | - Marek Majdan
- Trnava University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Department of Public Health, Institute for Global Health and Epidemiology, Slovakia
| | - Jukka Ranta
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Finland
| | - Martin Rusnak
- Trnava University, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Department of Public Health, Institute for Global Health and Epidemiology, Slovakia
| | - Eveline J A Wiegers
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cathrine Tverdal
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Louis Jacob
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - Mélanie Cogné
- University Hospital of Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Nicole von Steinbuechel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fure SCR, Howe EI, Andelic N, Brunborg C, Sveen U, Røe C, Rike PO, Olsen A, Spjelkavik Ø, Ugelstad H, Lu J, Ponsford J, Twamley EW, Hellstrøm T, Løvstad M. Cognitive and vocational rehabilitation after mild-to-moderate traumatic brain injury: A randomised controlled trial. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2021; 64:101538. [PMID: 33957293 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Returning to work is often a primary rehabilitation goal after traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, the evidence base for treatment options regarding return to work (RTW) and stable work maintenance remains scarce. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to examine the effect of a combined cognitive and vocational intervention on work-related outcomes after mild-to-moderate TBI. METHODS In this study, we compared 6 months of a combined compensatory cognitive training and supported employment (CCT-SE) intervention with 6 months of treatment as usual (TAU) in a randomised controlled trial to examine the effect on time to RTW, work percentage, hours worked per week and work stability. Eligible patients were those with mild-to-moderate TBI who were employed ≥50% at the time of injury, 18 to 60 years old and sick-listed ≥50% at 8 to 12 weeks after injury due to post-concussion symptoms, assessed by the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. Both treatments were provided at the outpatient TBI department at Oslo University Hospital, and follow-ups were conducted at 3, 6 and 12 months after inclusion. RESULTS We included 116 individuals, 60 randomised to CCT-SE and 56 to TAU. The groups did not differ in characteristics at the 12-month follow-up. Overall, a high proportion had returned to work at 12 months (CCT-SE, 90%; TAU, 84%, P=0.40), and all except 3 were stably employed after the RTW. However, a significantly higher proportion of participants in the CCT-SE than TAU group had returned to stable employment at 3 months (81% vs. 60%, P=0.02). CONCLUSION These results suggest that the CCT-SE intervention might help patients with mild-to-moderate TBI who are still sick-listed 8 to 12 weeks after injury in an earlier return to stable employment. However, the results should be replicated and a cost-benefit analysis performed before concluding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje C R Fure
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Emilie Isager Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Brunborg
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research Support Services, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Unni Sveen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Per-Ola Rike
- Department of Research, Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital Trust, Nesoddtangen, Norway
| | - Alexander Olsen
- Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Technology and Science, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Helene Ugelstad
- Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration, Oslo, Norway
| | - Juan Lu
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Jennie Ponsford
- Monash Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth W Twamley
- Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, Veterans Affairs (VA) San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Torgeir Hellstrøm
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne Løvstad
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nugraha B, Andelic N, Søberg HL, Engen G, Kirkevold M, Røe C, Gutenbrunner C. Towards standardized reporting of service organization in rehabilitation for clinical trials. J Rehabil Med 2021; 53:jrm00207. [PMID: 33961056 PMCID: PMC8814862 DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Meta-analysis of clinical trials in rehabilitation is often inconclusive, even when similar interventions are investigated. A possible reason for this is the influence of the settings in which rehabilitation services are delivered. Examples show that factors related to service organization in rehabilitation can influence study outcomes. This, in particular, is relevant, as contextual factors in rehabilitation are known to influence the participation and functioning of persons with disability. The Consolidated Statement of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group and other initiatives published standards for reporting relevant factors for clinical trials. However, description of the rehabilitation setting of factors related to rehabilitation service provision is under-represented. Systematic reviews show that, on the one hand, these factors are scarcely reported, and only a few studies systematically evaluated the influence of factors related to service organization on rehabilitation outcomes. The International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R) provides a framework to systematically describe rehabilitation services. It contains 40 categories and sub-categories for the domains "provider" and "service delivery". Therefore, it is important and relevant to develop a minimum reporting set for factors relevant to service organization for rehabilitation trials. This paper sets out a methodological approach for this purpose, including literature reviews, Delphi survey focus group discussion, and consensus conference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boya Nugraha
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str.1, DE-30625 Hannover, Germany. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rønning P, Helseth E, Skaansar O, Tverdal C, Andelic N, Bhatnagar R, Melberg M, Skaga NO, Aarhus M, Halvorsen S, Helseth R. Impact of Preinjury Antithrombotic Therapy on 30-Day Mortality in Older Patients Hospitalized With Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Front Neurol 2021; 12:650695. [PMID: 34054695 PMCID: PMC8155515 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.650695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Elderly patients are frequently in need of antithrombotic therapy for reducing thrombotic events. The association between antithrombotic drugs and survival after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is, nevertheless, unclear. Methods: This retrospective study included patients ≥65 years admitted to a Norwegian Level 1 trauma center with TBI identified on cerebral computed tomography (cerebral-CT) during 2014–2019. Preinjury use of antiplatelets and anticoagulants was compared to the prescription rate in the general Norwegian population. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses estimated the association between the use of antithrombotic drugs and mortality. Results: The study includes 832 consecutive TBI patients ≥65 years. The median age was 76 years, 58% were males, 51% had moderate or severe TBI, and 39% had multiple traumas. Preinjury use of antithrombotics was registered in 471/832 (55.6%) patients; antiplatelet therapy alone in 268, anticoagulant therapy alone in 172, and combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in 31. Antiplatelet use did not differ between the study cohort and the general Norwegian population ≥65 years (31 vs. 31%, p = 0.87). Anticoagulant therapy was used more commonly in the study cohort than in the general Norwegian population (24 vs. 19%, p = 0.04). Combined use of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy was significantly associated with 30-day mortality, while preinjury antiplatelet or anticoagulation treatment alone was not. No difference in 30-day mortality between patients using VKA, DOACs, or LMWH was encountered. Conclusions: In this cohort, neither antiplatelet nor anticoagulant therapy alone was associated with increased 30-day mortality. Anticoagulant use was more prevalent among TBI patients than the general population, suggesting that anticoagulation might contribute to the initiation of intracranial bleeding after blunt head trauma. Combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy posed increased risk of 30-day mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pål Rønning
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Helseth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ola Skaansar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine Tverdal
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rahul Bhatnagar
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mathias Melberg
- Department of Pulmonology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nils Oddvar Skaga
- Department of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mads Aarhus
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigrun Halvorsen
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Helseth
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Søberg HL, Andelic N, Langhammer B, Tamber AL, Bruusgaard KA, Kleffelgaard I. Effect of vestibular rehabilitation on change in health-related quality of life in patients with dizziness and balance problems after traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2021; 53:jrm00181. [PMID: 33842981 PMCID: PMC8814830 DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Secondary analysis, testing the effect on change in health-related quality of life of group-based vestibular rehabilitation in patients with mild-moderate traumatic brain injury, dizziness and -balance problems. DESIGN A single-blind randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS A total of 65 patients aged 16-60 years with a Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire dizziness score ≥2, and Dizziness Handicap Inventory score >15 points. Data collection was performed at baseline 3.5 (standard deviation (SD) 2.1) months post-injury, end of intervention, and 4.4 (SD 1.0) months after baseline. METHODS Quality of Life after Brain Injury was the main outcome. Independent variables were demographic and injury variables, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, changes on the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ3 physical and RPQ13 psychological/cognitive), and Vertigo Symptom Scale-Short Form. RESULTS Mean age of participants was 39.4 years (SD 13.0); 70.3% women. Predictors of change in the Quality of Life after Brain Injury were receiving the vestibular rehabilitation (p=0.049), baseline psychological distress (p=0.020), and change in RPQ3 physical (p=0.047) and RPQ13 psychological/cognitive (p=0.047). Adjusted R2 was 0.399, F=6.13, p<0.001. CONCLUSION There was an effect in favour of the intervention group in improvement in health-related quality of life. Changes on the Rivermead Post-concussion Symptoms Questionnaire were also associated with change on the Quality of Life after Brain Injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene L Søberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ulleval University Hospital, NO-0407 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: ,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|