Evolution and prediction of mismatch between observed and perceived upper limb function after stroke: a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study

U-Rate-UE; Measuring Perceived Recovery of the Affected Upper Extremity in Adults Post-stroke

OBJECTIVE

To establish initial validity of "U-Rate-UE", a single-question scale regarding perceived recovery of the stroke affected upper extremity (UE).

DESIGN

A retrospective longitudinal study of data collected at rehabilitation admission, 6 weeks, and 6 months since stroke.

SETTING

Stroke rehabilitation and community-based.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 87 individuals, median (interquartile range) age 71.5 (65-80) years, 15.0 (12-20) days post-stroke.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The affected UE was assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment, grip strength, Action Research Arm Test, the Box and Block Test (BBT), and The Rating of Everyday Arm-Use in the Community and Home. Participants also rated how much they perceive that their affected UE recovered from the stroke using U-Rate-UE; 0-100 (no to full recovery). Longitudinal changes in U-Rate-UE ratings were assessed. In addition, at 6 weeks and 6 months post-stroke, the change in BBT was calculated and participants were grouped into achieved/did not achieve the minimal detectable change (MDC). Correlations between U-Rate-UE to the other UE assessments were assessed at all 3 timepoints.

RESULTS

Significant changes in U-Rate-UE were seen over time (P<.05). At 6 weeks and 6 months, participants who achieved BBT-MDC rated their recovery significantly higher than participants who did not. U-Rate-UE was moderately-strongly significantly correlated to UE assessments (rho=.61-.85, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The U-Rate-UE is supported for use with UE assessments contributing to comprehensive clinical understanding of the recovery of the affected UE in adults post-stroke.

Self-perceived upper extremity motor function predicts health-related quality of life in chronic stroke survivors

PURPOSE

To examine whether the Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) score independently contributes to the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) score and quantified its relative contribution to SIS scores in chronic stroke survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study in a university-based rehabilitation centre with people with chronic stroke (N = 95) aged ≥ 50 years. The outcome measures included paretic hand grip strength, Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), UEFI, and SIS.

RESULTS

Correlation analysis revealed that paretic hand grip strength, FMA-UE, UEFI, and WMFT scores exhibited a significant moderate positive correlation with SIS scores (r = 0.544-0.687, p < 0.001). The results of a regression model indicated that after adjustment for demographic factors and stroke-related impairments, the UEFI scores remained independently associated with SIS scores, accounting for 18.8% of the variance. The entire model explained 60.3% of the variance in SIS scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-perceived UE motor function is a crucial component to be included in rehabilitation programmes aimed at enhancing quality of life and participation among chronic stroke survivors.

The feasibility of the adapted H-GRASP program for perceived and actual daily-life upper limb activity in the chronic phase post-stroke

(Purpose: Assessing feasibility and initial impact of the Home-Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program combined with in-home accelerometer-based feedback (AH-GRASP) on perceived and actual daily-life upper limb (UL) activity in stroke survivors during the chronic phase with good UL motor function but low perceived daily-life activity. Material and methods: A 4-week intervention program (4 contact hours, 48 h self-practice) encompassing task-oriented training, behavioral techniques, phone-based support, monitoring, and weekly feedback sessions using wrist-worn accelerometery was implemented using a pre-post double baseline repeated measures design. Feasibility, clinical assessments, patient-reported outcomes, and accelerometer data were investigated. Results: Of the 34 individuals approached, nineteen were included (recruitment rate 56%). Two dropped out, one due to increased UL pain (retention rate 89%). Seven (41%) achieved the prescribed exercise target (120 min/day, six days/week). Positive patient experiences and improvements in UL capacity, self-efficacy, and contribution of the affected UL to overall activity (p < 0.05, small to large effect sizes) were observed. Additionally, seven participants (41%) surpassed the minimal clinically important difference in perceived UL activity.Conclusions: A home-based UL exercise program with accelerometer-based feedback holds promise for enhancing perceived and actual daily-life UL activity for our subgroup of chronic stroke survivors.

Correlation between kinetic and kinematic measures, clinical tests and subjective self-evaluation questionnaires of the affected upper limb in people after stroke

Introduction

Assessment of stroke recovery should include multiple sources of information in order to obtain a complete understanding of the individual's rehabilitation progress. Self-evaluation questionnaires' scores do not always correspond to the scores of commonly used clinical evaluation tools. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between self-evaluation questionnaires, clinical tests, and kinematic and kinetic analyses of the affected upper limb after stroke, and to determine the correlation between these measures and self-reported general function 2-4 years after the stroke.

Methods

Twenty-six subjects recovering from stroke were included in the study. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to measure the correlation between Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), Motor activity Log (MAL), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Action Reach Arm Test (ARAT) scores, and kinematic and kinetic analyses. A logistic regression was used to assess the extent to which these measures may predict the participants' functional self-reported status 2-4 years post stroke.

Results

Sections regarding hand function, hand force and general ADL of the self-evaluation questionnaires correlated with kinematic variables. However, only questionnaires that focus on hand function correlated with clinical tests. Mean and maximal hand velocity had the strongest correlations with self-evaluation questionnaires and with the clinical tests, more than other kinematic variables. Self-evaluation questionnaires and clinical tests were found to be correlated with hand kinetic metrics force-to-time ratio and number of force peaks. SIS hand force domain, mean velocity and maximal velocity predicted self-reported general function 2-4 years after the stroke.

Conclusion

Self-evaluation questionnaires should be considered for wider use in the clinical evaluation of a patient's stroke recovery, since they add important information on the individual's functional status, which is not reflected in the clinical tests.