Caspr2 antibodies in herpes simplex encephalitis: an extension of the spectrum of virus induced autoimmunity? - A case report

Therapeutic Approach to Autoimmune Neurologic Disorders

OBJECTIVE

Autoimmune neurologic disorders encompass a broad category of diseases characterized by immune system attack of the central, peripheral, or autonomic nervous systems. This article provides information on both acute and maintenance immunotherapy used to treat autoimmune neurologic disorders as well as a review of symptomatic management and special considerations when caring for patients with these diseases.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Over the past 20 years, more than 50 antibodies have been identified and associated with autoimmune neurologic disorders. Although advances in diagnostic testing have allowed for more rapid diagnosis, the therapeutic approach to these disorders has largely continued to rely on expert opinion, case series, and case reports. With US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of biologic agents to treat neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myasthenia gravis as well as ongoing clinical trials for the treatment of autoimmune encephalitis, the landscape of immunotherapy options continues to expand. Consideration of the unique pathogenesis of individual autoimmune neurologic disorders as well as the mechanism of action of the diverse range of treatment options can help guide treatment decisions today while evidence from clinical trials informs new therapeutics in the future.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Recognizing patients who have a clinical history and examination findings concerning for autoimmune neurologic disorders and conducting a thorough and directed imaging and laboratory evaluation aimed at ruling out mimics, identifying specific autoimmune syndromes, and screening for factors that may have an impact on immunotherapy choices early in the clinical course are essential to providing optimal care for these patients. Providers must consider immunotherapy, symptomatic treatment, and a multidisciplinary approach that addresses each patient's unique needs when treating patients with autoimmune neurologic disorders.

The immunobiology of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and post-viral autoimmunity

Herpes simplex virus encephalitis (HSE) is the leading cause of non-epidemic encephalitis in the developed world and, despite antiviral therapy, mortality and morbidity is high. The emergence of post-HSE autoimmune encephalitis reveals a new immunological paradigm in autoantibody-mediated disease. A reductionist evaluation of the immunobiological mechanisms in HSE is crucial to dissect the origins of post-viral autoimmunity and supply rational approaches to the selection of immunotherapeutics. Herein, we review the latest evidence behind the phenotypic progression and underlying immunobiology of HSE including the cytokine/chemokine environment, the role of pathogen-recognition receptors, T- and B-cell immunity and relevant inborn errors of immunity. Second, we provide a contemporary review of published patients with post-HSE autoimmune encephalitis from a combined cohort of 110 patients. Third, we integrate novel mechanisms of autoimmunization in deep cervical lymph nodes to explore hypotheses around post-HSE autoimmune encephalitis and challenge these against mechanisms of molecular mimicry and others. Finally, we explore translational concepts where neuroglial surface autoantibodies have been observed with other neuroinfectious diseases and those that generate brain damage including traumatic brain injury, ischaemic stroke and neurodegenerative disease. Overall, the clinical and immunological landscape of HSE is an important and evolving field, from which precision immunotherapeutics could soon emerge.

When herpes simplex virus encephalitis meets antiviral innate immunity

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is the most common pathogen of infectious encephalitis, accounting for nearly half of the confirmed cases of encephalitis. Its clinical symptoms are often atypical. HSV PCR in cerebrospinal fluid is helpful for diagnosis, and the prognosis is usually satisfactory after regular antiviral treatment. Interestingly, some patients with recurrent encephalitis have little antiviral effect. HSV PCR in cerebrospinal fluid is negative, but glucocorticoid has a significant effect after treatment. Specific antibodies, such as the NMDA receptor antibody, the GABA receptor antibody, and even some unknown antibodies, can be isolated from cerebrospinal fluid, proving that the immune system contributes to recurrent encephalitis, but the specific mechanism is still unclear. Based on recent studies, we attempt to summarize the relationship between herpes simplex encephalitis and innate immunity, providing more clues for researchers to explore this field further.

Autoimmune encephalitis after herpes simplex encephalitis: A still undefined condition

Herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE) is one of the most common sporadic viral encephalitis. Generally, HSE is characterized by a monophasic short course, although in some patients neurological relapses or worsening of deficits can develop some weeks later, when viral therapy has been discontinued and signs and symptoms of the central nervous system (CNS) damage seem to have stabilized. The second HSE stage is generally identified as autoimmune encephalitis after HSE (AEaHSE). Aim of this paper is to discuss which are the present knowledge in this regard. Literature analysis showed that AEaHSE exists, it is more common in younger children and it has different clinical manifestations according to age. All the patients with AEaHSE are positive for one or more neuronal cell-surface and synaptic antibodies, mainly anti-NMDAR antibodies, and the earlier the appearance of the antibodies the greater the risk of AEaHSE development. This means that a careful monitoring of antibody production starting from anti-NMDAR antibodies in all HSE cases could lead to the early identification of AEaHSE and the prompt administration of a potentially effective therapy. Further studies are needed to clarify which are the main pathogenetic mechanisms, whether there are differences in risk of development and clinical course of AEaHSE according to the type of antibody production, why response to immunosuppressive therapy significantly varies and whether administration of steroids to patients with HSE during the first phase of disease can play a role for reducing the risk of AEaHSE development.