Speculum versus digital insertion of Foley catheter for induction of labor in Nulliparas with unripe cervix: a randomized controlled trial

Digital versus Speculum-Based Balloon Catheter Insertion for Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Digital vs speculum-based balloon IOL

OBJECTIVES

Induction of labor is commonly undertaken when ongoing pregnancy poses risk to either mother or fetus. Often cervical preparation is required with mechanical methods increasingly popular due to their improved safety. This study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of digital versus speculum-based balloon insertion for cervical preparation, aiming to identify gaps and inform future research.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from database inception until 30 June 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Included studies were randomized controlled trials comparing digital versus speculum-based insertion of catheter-related balloons for labor induction in individuals with viable singleton pregnancies, in both inpatient and outpatient settings, written in English. Exclusions included studies not using cervical balloons, comparisons to non-balloon methods, non-human studies, and non-primary literature like guidelines, reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces.

METHODS

Title and abstract screening were performed by four authors. Full-text articles were assessed against inclusion criteria. Selection was agreed upon by consensus among three authors, with a fourth consulted for disputes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 for randomized trials. A meta-analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Out of 3397 studies, four met the inclusion criteria, all being randomized controlled trials with some concerns in at least one domain but no high risk of bias. Two studies found digital insertion significantly less painful than speculum-based insertion (p<0.001), while one reported no difference (p=0.72). Maternal satisfaction was comparable, with one study favouring digital insertion (p=0.011). Meta-analysis findings for other outcome measures suggest no difference between speculum or digital insertion. However, due to substantial heterogeneity, findings for procedural time, time from induction-to-delivery, and epidural rate should be cautiously interpreted.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital insertion for cervical preparation appears associated with reduced pain and higher patient acceptability compared to speculum-based insertion. Additionally, efficacy and safety were comparable, indicating it is a preferable option for clinical use. There was no difference in other procedural, obstetric, or neonatal outcomes, however, more rigorous research employing standardised outcome measures is needed to facilitate a clinically meaningful interpretation.

Digital versus speculum insertion of Foley catheter for labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To compare Foley catheter insertion by digital blind method to its placement with a sterile speculum in women with unripe cervix for induction of labor.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. Included studies compared digital to speculum placement of the Foley catheter for labor induction. Data from the included studies were extracted and pooled using RevMan software for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was pain score during the procedure measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included Foley catheter insertion duration, cesarean delivery rate, induction to delivery interval, Bishop score, need for other cervical ripening methods, maternal satisfaction, and maternal fever.

RESULTS

Four RCTs involving a total of 600 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pain during the procedure and Foley catheter insertion duration were significantly reduced in the digital insertion group compared to the speculum-guided group (p < 0.05). The Bishop score showed a significant improvement in the digital Foley catheter placement group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the cesarean delivery rate or the requirement for additional cervical ripening methods between the two groups. Maternal satisfaction with the delivery process was significantly improved in the digital insertion group (p < 0.001). Induction to delivery interval and maternal fever were comparable between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital placement of Foley catheter can be considered as an alternative to the sterile speculum method for pre-induction cervical ripening. More trials are required to confirm our findings.

Comparison of digital and speculum-guided methods of transcervical Foley catheter insertion in primigravida undergoing cervical ripening at term gestation: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Foley catheter insertion is frequently used for cervical ripening during the induction of labor. However, the insertion failure, safety, maternal side effects, complications, and satisfaction of digital compared with speculum-guided Foley catheter placement have not been evaluated in a large trial involving primigravida.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare the insertion failure rate of digital and speculum-based transcervical Foley catheter placement in primigravida. The co-primary outcome was insertion-associated pain. The secondary outcomes were the time required for successful insertion, maternal satisfaction, and maternal complications within 24 hours of Foley insertion.

STUDY DESIGN

This randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, noninferiority clinical trial was performed in a large tertiary care university hospital. Primigravida aged >18 years with term gestation (≥37 weeks) were included in this study. Additional inclusion criteria for enrollment in this study were singleton pregnancy with a cephalic presentation, intact membrane, a Bishop score of ≤5, and reassuring preinduction fetal heart rate tracing. All women planned for cervical ripening were assessed for eligibility and were randomized into digital or speculum arms. Foley catheter insertion was performed in a supine lithotomy position. Vaginal and cervical cleaning were performed before insertion. A 22-French Foley balloon catheter was guided digitally or via speculum to position the bulb at the level of the internal os using water-soluble lubricant. Insertion-associated pain was measured using a visual numeric rating scale, and maternal satisfaction was assessed using a set of questions.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-nine pregnant women were assessed for eligibility, and 446 patients were enrolled and randomized. The median age of the parturients was 24 (19-40) and 24 (18-38) years, respectively. The body mass index, gestational age at randomization, the incidence of postdated pregnancy, and prerandomization Bishop scores were comparable. Insertion failure was observed in 24 (10.8%) and 17 (7.6%) women in digital and speculum arms, respectively (relative risk=1.41 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-2.55]; P=.25). Requirements of >1 attempt (5.4% vs 3.6%) followed by the change in hands (3.6% vs 2.7%) were the most common reasons for insertion failure. The median (interquartile range) visual numeric rating scale was comparable (6 [2-9] vs 5 [2-10]; P=.15). The time taken for successful insertion was similar (58 [12-241] vs 54 [10-281]; P=.30). 9.4% and 10.8% of women required additional methods of cervical ripening. More women in the speculum group (41.7% vs 33.2%; P=.06) felt a medium level of discomfort than the digital group.

CONCLUSION

Insertion failure and insertion-related pain in the digital approach were comparable to the speculum-guided approach for transcervical Foley catheter insertion in primigravida for cervical ripening. Nevertheless, maternal satisfaction was higher in the digital group because of a lesser level of discomfort.

Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety

This review assessed the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic agents (prostaglandins, oxytocin, mifepristone, hyaluronidase, and nitric oxide donors) and mechanical methods (single- and double-balloon catheters, laminaria, membrane stripping, and amniotomy) and those generally considered under the rubric of complementary medicine (castor oil, nipple stimulation, sexual intercourse, herbal medicine, and acupuncture). A substantial body of published reports, including 2 large network meta-analyses, support the safety and efficacy of misoprostol (PGE1) when used for cervical ripening and labor induction. Misoprostol administered vaginally at doses of 50 μg has the highest probability of achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Regardless of dosing, route, and schedule of administration, when used for cervical ripening and labor induction, prostaglandin E2 seems to have similar efficacy in decreasing cesarean delivery rates. Globally, although oxytocin represents the most widely used pharmacologic agent for labor induction, its effectiveness is highly dependent on parity and cervical status. Oxytocin is more effective than expectant management in inducing labor, and the efficacy of oxytocin is enhanced when combined with amniotomy. However, prostaglandins administered vaginally or intracervically are more effective in inducing labor than oxytocin. A single 200-mg oral tablet of mifepristone seems to represent the lowest effective dose for cervical ripening. The bulk of the literature assessing relaxin suggests this agent has limited benefit when used for this indication. Although intracervical injection of hyaluronidase may cause cervical ripening, the need for intracervical administration has limited the use of this agent. Concerning the vaginal administration of nitric oxide donors, including isosorbide mononitrate, isosorbide, nitroglycerin, and sodium nitroprusside, the higher incidence of side effects with these agents has limited their use. A synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator has been found to be effective for preinduction cervical ripening. Although a pharmacologic agent may be administered after the use of the synthetic hygroscopic dilator, in an attempt to reduce the interval to vaginal delivery, concomitant use of mechanical and pharmacologic methods is being explored. Combining the use of a single-balloon catheter with dinoprostone, misoprostol, or oxytocin enhances the efficacy of these pharmacologic agents in cervical ripening and labor induction. The efficacy of single- and double-balloon catheters in cervical ripening and labor induction seems similar. To date, the combination of misoprostol with an intracervical catheter seems to be the best approach when balancing delivery times with safety. Although complementary methods are occasionally used by patients, given the lack of data documenting their efficacy and safety, these methods are rarely used in hospital settings.

Six compared with 12 hours of Foley balloon placement for labor induction in nulliparous women with unripe cervices: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Compared with a planned 12-hour placement of a double-balloon catheter, a planned 6-hour placement of a double-balloon catheter shortens the labor induction to delivery interval. The Foley catheter is low cost. Moreover, it has at least comparable effectiveness to the proprietary double-balloon labor induction devices. Of note, a 6-hour placement of a Foley balloon catheter in nulliparas has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate 6- vs 12-hour Foley balloon placement for cervical ripening in the labor induction of nulliparas.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Universiti Malaya Medical Centre from January 2022 to August 2022. Nulliparas aged ≥18 years, with a term, singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, with intact membranes, with reassuring fetal heart rate tracing, with an unripe cervix, and without any significant contractions, were recruited at admission for labor induction. Participants were randomized after successful Foley balloon insertion, for the balloon to be left passively in place for 6 or 12 hours and then removed to check for a ripened cervix. Amniotomy was performed once the cervix had ripened, followed by titrated oxytocin infusion to expedite labor and delivery. The primary outcome was the labor induction to delivery interval. The secondary outcomes were mostly from the core outcome set for trials on labor induction of labor trial reporting, such as change in the Bishop score after the intervention, use of an additional method for cervical ripening, time to delivery after double-balloon device removal, mode of delivery, indication for cesarean delivery, duration of oxytocin infusion, blood loss during delivery, presence of a third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, maternal infection, maternal satisfaction regional analgesia in labor, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit admission, cardiorespiratory arrest, need for hysterectomy. The neonatal outcomes were Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit admission, cord pH, neonatal sepsis, fetal birthweight, birth trauma, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or need for therapeutic hypothermia. Data were analyzed using the t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate for the data type.

RESULTS

Overall, 240 women were randomized, 120 to each arm. The median labor induction to delivery intervals were 21.3 hours (interquartile range, 16.2-27.9) for the 6-hour balloon catheter placement and 26.0 hours (interquartile range, 21.5-30.9) for the 12-hour balloon catheter placement (P<.001). Of the secondary outcomes, for 6- vs 12-hour balloon catheter placement, the sequential use of additional cervical ripening agent (mostly Foley reinsertion) was 33 of 119 (27.5%) vs 17 of 120 (14.2%) (relative risk, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-3.29; P=.011), Bishop score increase was 3 (interquartile range, 2.00-3.75) vs 3 (2.25-4.00) (P=.002), and the rate of recommendation to a friend was 83 of 118 (70.3%) vs 101 of 119 (84.9%) (relative risk, 0.83; 95% confidence interval; 0.72-0.95; P=.007), respectively. Cesarean delivery rates were 52 of 119 (43.7%) for the 6-hour balloon catheter placement and 64 of 120 (53.3%) for the 12-hour balloon catheter placement (relative risk, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.07; P=.136), and maternal satisfaction scores (0-10 numerical rating scale) were 7 (interquartile range, 6-9) for the 6-hour balloon catheter placement and 7 (interquartile range, 7-9) for the 12-hour balloon catheter placement (P=.880).

CONCLUSION

Compared with a planned 12-hour Foley balloon catheter placement, a planned 6-hour Foley balloon placement shortens the time to birth, despite less cervical ripening at Foley balloon catheter removal and more additional cervical ripening agent use. However, the 6-hour balloon catheter placement was less likely to be recommended to a friend than the 12-hour balloon catheter placement.

Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Planned 6- vs 12-hour placement of the double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening in labor induction hastens delivery. The Foley catheter is low-priced and typically performs at least as well as the proprietary double-balloon devices in labor induction. Maternal satisfaction with labor induction is usually inversely related to the speed of the process.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare Foley balloon placement for 6 vs 12 hours in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from January to October of 2022. Eligible multiparous women admitted for induction of labor for various indications were enrolled. Participant inclusion criteria were multiparity (at least 1 previous vaginal delivery of ≥24 weeks' gestation), age ≥18 years, term pregnancy >37 weeks' gestation, singleton pregnancy, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, normal fetal heart rate tracing, no significant contractions (< 2 in 10 minutes), and unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < 6). Participants were randomized after successful Foley balloon insertion for the balloon to be left in place for 6 or 12 hours of passive ripening before removal to check cervical suitability for amniotomy. The primary outcomes were the induction-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction with the allocated intervention assessed using a visual numerical rating scale (0-10). Secondary outcomes were derived in part from the core outcome set for trials on induction of labor (Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health [CROWN]). Maternal outcomes were change in first Bishop score after intervention, use of additional method for cervical ripening, time to delivery after balloon removal, mode of delivery, indication for cesarean delivery, duration of oxytocin infusion, blood loss during delivery, presence of third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, maternal infection, use of regional analgesia in labor, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, cardiorespiratory arrest, and need for hysterectomy. The secondary neonatal outcomes were Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, cord blood pH, neonatal sepsis, birthweight, birth trauma, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or need for therapeutic hypothermia. Analyses were conducted with the t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 220 women were randomized (110 to each intervention). Regarding the 2 primary outcomes, the induction-to-delivery intervals were a median (interquartile range) of 15.9 (12.0-24.0) and 21.6 (17.3-26.0) hours (P<.001), and maternal satisfaction scores were 7 (6-8) and 7 (6-8) (P=.734) for 6- and 12-hour placement, respectively. The following rates were observed for 6- and 12-hour placement, respectively: sequential use of additional cervical ripening agent (Foley reinsertion)-29 per 110 (26.4%) and 13 per 110 (11.8%) (relative risk, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-4.10; P=.006); spontaneous balloon expulsion-22 per 110 (20.0%) and 37 per 110 (33.6%) (relative risk, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.94; P=.022); and recommendation of the allocated intervention to a friend-61 per 110 (73.6%) and 87 per 110 (79.1%) (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.08; P=.341). Other secondary outcomes, including cesarean delivery, were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Foley balloon placement for 6 hours for cervical ripening in parous women hastens birth but does not increase maternal satisfaction relative to 12-hour placement. Foley reinsertion for additional ripening was more frequent in the 6-hour group.

Induction of labor via Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unfavorable cervices: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Induction of labor in women with 1 previous cesarean delivery and unripe cervices is a high-risk process, carrying an increased risk of uterine rupture and the need for cesarean delivery. Balloon ripening is often chosen as prostaglandin use is associated with an appreciable risk of uterine rupture in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. A shorter duration of placement of the balloon typically expedites delivery; however, this has not been evaluated in induction of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 vs 12 hours in induction of labor after 1 previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from January 2022 to February 2023. Eligible women with 1 previous cesarean delivery admitted for induction of labor were enrolled. Participants were randomized after balloon catheter insertion for 6 or 12 hours of passive ripening before balloon deflation and removal to check cervical status for amniotomy. The primary outcome was the induction of labor to delivery interval. The secondary outcomes were largely derived from the core outcome set for trials on induction of labor (Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health [CROWN]). The Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test were used as appropriate for the data.

RESULTS

Overall, 126 women were randomized, 63 to each intervention. The mean induction of labor to delivery intervals were 23.0 (standard deviation, ±8.9) in the 6-hour arm and 26.6 (standard deviation, ±7.1) in the 12-hour arm (mean difference, -3.5 hours; 95% confidence interval, -6.4 to -0.7; P=.02). The median induction of labor (Foley balloon catheter insertion) to Foley balloon catheter removal intervals were 6.0 hours (interquartile range, 6.0-6.3) in the 6-hour arm and 12.0 hours (interquartile range, 12.0-12.5) in the 12-hour arm (P<.001). The median induction of labor to amniotomy intervals were 14.1 hours (interquartile range, 9.3-21.8) in the 6-hour arm and 19.0 hours (interquartile range, 15.9-22.0) in the 12-hour arm (P=.02). The usage rates of epidural analgesia in labor were 46.0% (29/63) in the 6-hour arm and 65.1% (41/63) in the 12-hour arm (relative risk, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.98; P=.03). Spontaneous balloon catheter expulsion rates were 22.2% (14/63) in the 6-hour arm and 17.5% (11/63) in the 12-hour arm (relative risk, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-2.58; P=.50), and additional ripening use rates (Foley reinsertion) were 46.0% (29/63) in the 6-hour arm and 31.7% (20/63) in the 12-hour arm (relative risk, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-2.27; P=.10). The results were not different. Moreover, maternal satisfaction scores (0-10 numerical rating scale) of 9 (range, 8-10) in the 6-hour arm and 9 (range, 8-10) in the 12-hour arm (P=.41) were not different. Other secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes were not significantly different either.

CONCLUSION

Foley balloon catheter placement for 6 hours hastened birth and reduced epidural analgesia use in labor without a change in maternal satisfaction.

Application of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening

INTRODUCTION

At present, the double balloon represented by the COOK Cervix Ripening Balloon and the single balloon represented by the Foley catheter are the commonly used intrauterine balloons. The application of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening has evolved over 100 years. Although intrauterine balloons have been widely used in cervical ripening, the effect of labor induction in clinical practice does not satisfy all clinicians, especially patients with poor cervical maturity.

AREAS COVERED

The research in this review is about intrauterine balloons and cervical ripening.

EXPERT OPINION

This article reviews the historical evolution and different application methods of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening, such as application range, placement method and placement duration of intrauterine balloons, volume and temperature of the solution fillings, and whether to apply traction to the catheter. We aim to better understand the principle of intrauterine balloons in cervical ripening and make this method more effective.

Foley catheter compared with controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction after one previous cesarean delivery: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare Foley catheter and controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert on induction-to-delivery interval and maternal satisfaction in women with one previous cesarean delivery.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, from December 12, 2018, to May 28, 2019. A total of 78 term women scheduled for labor induction with one previous cesarean delivery who had ripe cervixes, singleton gestation, cephalic presentation, intact membranes, and reassuring cardiotocogram were randomized to Foley catheter or dinoprostone insert. The primary outcome was induction-to-delivery interval (in hours) and the secondary outcomes included maternal satisfaction on birth experience (assessed by 100-mm visual analog scale).

RESULTS

Induction-to-delivery intervals were as follows: median 33.5 h (interquartile range [IQR], 26.1-36.2 h) versus 23.5 h (IQR, 12.7-34.5 h) (P = 0.004), and maternal satisfaction on birth process 100-mm visual analog scale was 80 mm (IQR, 64-88 mm) versus 82 mm (IQR, 67-88 mm) (P = 0.919) for the Foley and controlled-release dinoprostone arms, respectively. Cesarean delivery rates were 23 of 39 (59%) versus 20 of 39 (51%) (relative risk, 1.15 [95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.72]) (P = 0.496) and trial device insertion to removal time mean ± standard deviation was 20.1 ± 7.1 h versus 14.2 ± 7.3 h (P = 0.001) for Foley versus controlled-release dinoprostone, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In term women after one previous cesarean delivery with unripe cervixes, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert compared with Foley catheter shortens the induction-to-delivery interval but maternal satisfaction was not significantly increased.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with ISRCTN on November 30, 2018, with trial identification number: ISRCTN16957529 (https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16957529). The first participant was recruited on December 12, 2018.

Effect of Oxytocin Combined with Different Volume of Water Sac in High-Risk Term Pregnancies

Objective

The study estimated the impacts of water sac of different capacities combined with oxytocin (OXT) on pregnant women with high-risk term pregnancies.

Methods

Women with high-risk term pregnancies who received OXT were enrolled to perform labor induction using 30  mL (group A), 80 mL (group B), and 150  mL (group C), followed by the comparisons regarding to the success rate of labor induction, cesarean section rate, duration of induced labor to labor, duration of the first stage of labor, postpartum blood loss, the incidence of adverse reactions, and the assessment of cervical ripening using Bishop Score. Besides, neonatal weight, Apgar score, as well as psychological status, and satisfaction of patients were compared among these groups.

Results

As compared with group A, the success rate of induced labor was higher in groups B and C with lower cesarean section rate and shorter duration of induced labor to labor, but the duration of the first stage of labor in group B was the shortest among the three groups. The amount of postpartum hemorrhage decreased stepwise from groups A to B to C. In addition, groups A and B showed a reduced incidence of adverse reactions than group C, but the highest level of cervical ripening and highest patient satisfaction was revealed in group C and group B, respectively. Furthermore, the highest patient satisfaction was found in group B.

Conclusion

The usage of an 80  mL water sac combined with OXT  in high-risk term pregnancy has ideal induction effects, which can guarantee maternal cervical maturity and shorten the time of the first stage of labor.

Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone insert compared to foley catheter alone on induction to delivery interval and maternal satisfaction.

METHODS

A randomized trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from December 2018 to May 2019. Term nulliparas with unfavorable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 5) scheduled for labor induction were randomized to Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone insert simultaneously or Foley catheter alone. Primary outcomes were induction to delivery interval (hours) and maternal satisfaction on birth experience (assessed by 11-point Visual Numerical Rating Scale VNRS 0-10, higher score more satisfied).

RESULTS

Induction to vaginal delivery intervals was mean ± standard deviation 22.5 ± 10.4 vs. 35.1 ± 14.9 h, P =  < 0.001 but maternal satisfaction on birth experience was not significantly different median[interquartile range] VNRS 8[7-9] vs. 8[7-9], P = 0.12 for Foley catheter-controlled-release dinoprostone and Foley catheter alone arms, respectively. Cesarean delivery rates were 35/102(34.3%) vs. 50/101(49.5%), P = 0.02 RR 0.7 95% CI 0.5-0.9 NNTb 6.3 95% CI 3.5-39.4, pain score at 6 h after catheter insertion 5[2-8] vs. 1[1-3], P < 0.001, Bishop score at trial devices removal 9[9-10] vs. 8[7-9], P = 0.001, requirement for oxytocin induction or augmentation 39/102(38.2%) vs. 76/101(75.2%) NNTb 3 95% CI 2.0-4.1, P < 0.001 and amniotomy rates 73/99(73.7%) vs. 81/95(85.3%), P = 0.052 RR 0.9 85% CI 0.8-1.0 in Foley catheter-controlled-release dinoprostone and Foley catheter alone arms respectively.

CONCLUSION

In nulliparas with unripe cervixes at term, combined Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert compared to Foley catheter alone reduces the induction to vaginal delivery interval and cesarean delivery rate but satisfaction was not significantly increased.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN2282883, 03/12/2018, "prospectively registered" ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12282883 ).

American College of Nurse-Midwives Clinical Bulletin Number 18: Induction of Labor

Induction of labor is an increasingly common component of intrapartum care in the United States. This rise is fueled by a nationwide escalation in both medically indicated and elective inductions at or beyond term, supported by recent research showing some benefits of induction over expectant management. However, induction of labor medicalizes the birth experience and may lead to a complex cascade of interventions. The purpose of this Clinical Bulletin is twofold: (1) to guide clinicians on the use of person-centered decision-making when discussing induction of labor and (2) to review evidence-based practice recommendations for intrapartum midwifery care during labor induction.

Outpatient vs inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in multiparas with unripe cervixes: A randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Multiparous labor inductions are typically successful, and the process can be rapid, starting from a ripened cervix with a predictable response to amniotomy and oxytocin infusion. Outpatient Foley catheter labor induction in multiparas with unripe cervixes is a feasible option as the mechanical process of ripening is usually without significant uterine contractions and well tolerated. Labor contractions can be initiated by amniotomy and titrated oxytocin infusion in the hospital for well-timed births during working hours as night birth are associated with adverse events. We sought to evaluate outpatient compared with inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in multiparas for births during working hours and maternal satisfaction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A randomized trial was conducted in the University of Malaya Medical Center. A total of 163 term multiparas (no dropouts) with unripe cervixes (Bishop score ≤5) scheduled for labor induction were randomized to outpatient or inpatient Foley catheter. Primary outcomes were delivery during "working hours" 08:00-18:00 h and maternal satisfaction on allocated care (assessed by 11-point visual numerical rating score 0-10, with higher score indicating more satisfied).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN13534944.

RESULTS

Comparing outpatient and inpatient arms, delivery during working hours were 54/82 (65.9%) vs. 48/81 (59.3%) (relative risk 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4, p = 0.421) and median maternal satisfaction visual numerical rating score was 9 (interquartile range 9-9) vs. 9 (interquartile range 8-9, p = 0.134), repectively. Duration of hospital stay and membrane rupture to delivery interval were significantly shorter in the outpatient arm: 35.8 ± 20.2 vs. 45.2 ± 16.2 h (p = 0.001) and 4.1 ± 2.9 vs. 5.3 ± 3.6 h (p = 0.020), respectively. Other maternal and neonatal secondary outcomes were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial failed to demonstrate the anticipated increase in births during working hours with outpatient compared with inpatient induction of labor with Foley catheter in parous women with an unripe cervix. Hospital stay and membrane rupture to delivery interval were significantly shortened in the outpatient group. The rate of maternal satisfaction was high in both groups and no significant differences were found.