In chronic myeloid leukemia patients on second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, deep sequencing of BCR-ABL1 at the time of warning may allow sensitive detection of emerging drug-resistant mutants

Validation of a novel NGS based BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutation detection assay in Indian cohort

The efficacy and treatment outcome of a CML patient are heavily dependent on BCR::ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation status. Next-generation sequencing technology is a bright alternative to the previously used sanger sequencing method due to its global presence in diagnostic setups, massive parallel sequencing ability, and far better sensitivity. In the present study, we have demonstrated a new protocol for kinase domain mutation analysis using the next-generation sequencing (NGS) method using the ion torrent sequencing platform. This protocol uses RNA as the starting material, followed by nested PCR to amplify the fusion transcript, which is subsequently used as a template for NGS. Initial validation and comparison of this assay with the sanger sequencing (SS) method yielded 95.23% agreement. CML samples (n = 121) with a failure to TKI response were subjected to this newly developed NGS-based assay to detect KD mutations, from which samples were found to have mutations with a sensitivity ranging from 2.32 to 93.41%. A total of 34.71% of samples (n = 42) were found to be positive for one or more KD mutations, whereas 65.29% of samples (n = 81) were found to be negative. Nine samples out of 42 positive samples, i.e., 21.42%, were found to have compound mutations. This is one of the first studies from India, which includes more than 160 samples and is analyzed by the NGS approach for KD mutation analysis.

European LeukemiaNet laboratory recommendations for the diagnosis and management of chronic myeloid leukemia

From the laboratory perspective, effective management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) requires accurate diagnosis, assessment of prognostic markers, sequential assessment of levels of residual disease and investigation of possible reasons for resistance, relapse or progression. Our scientific and clinical knowledge underpinning these requirements continues to evolve, as do laboratory methods and technologies. The European LeukemiaNet convened an expert panel to critically consider the current status of genetic laboratory approaches to help diagnose and manage CML patients. Our recommendations focus on current best practice and highlight the strengths and pitfalls of commonly used laboratory tests.

A customized mass array panel for BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain mutation screening in chronic myeloid leukemia

Introduction

The therapeutic strategy and management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have rapidly improved with the discovery of effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to target BCR::ABL1 oncoprotein. However, nearly 30% of patients develop TKI resistance due to acquired mutations on the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) of BCR::ABL1.

Methods

We customized a mass array panel initially intended to detect and monitor the mutational burden of hotspot BCR::ABL1 TKD mutations accumulated in our database, including key mutations recently recommended by European LeukemiaNet. Additionally, we extended the feasibility of using the assay panel for the molecular classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) by incorporating primer sets specific for analyzing JAK2 V617F, MPL 515 K/L, and CALR types 1 and 2.

Results

We found that the developed mass array panel was superior for detecting and monitoring clinically significant BCR::ABL1 TKD mutations, especially in cases with low mutational burden and harboring compound/polyclonal mutations, compared with direct sequencing. Moreover, our customized mass array panel detected common genetic alterations in MPNs, and the findings were consistent with those of other comparable assays available in our laboratory.

Conclusions

Our customized mass array panel was practicably used as a routine robust assay for screening and monitoring BCR::ABL1 TKD mutations in patients with CML undergoing TKI treatment and feasible for analyzing common genetic mutations in MPNs.

Guidelines for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia from the NCCN and ELN: differences and similarities

Patients diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase can now have a life expectancy comparable to that of the general population thanks to the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies. Although most patients with CML require lifelong TKI therapy, it is possible for some patients to achieve treatment-free remission. These spectacular results have been made possible by the development of superior treatment modalities as well as clinicians' efforts in strictly adhering to clinical guidelines such as the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Leukemia Network (ELN). CML treatment recommendations reported in these guidelines are the result of years of selecting and incorporating the most reliable evidence. In this review, we provide a synopsis of the differences and similarities that exist between the NCCN and ELN guidelines.

CML Resistant to 2nd-Generation TKIs: Mechanisms, Next Steps, and New Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The clinical scenario for chronic myeloid leukemia patients rapidly changed after the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Second-generation TKIs as frontline treatment increased the rate of deep molecular responses without increasing the rate of overall survival. About 20% of patients experience resistance to these agents, needing alternative treatments. Here, we reviewed the possible mechanisms of resistance, available treatment, and new drugs developed to counteract and overcome resistance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Results of novel TKIs have been recently reported, especially for the setting of T315I mutated patients, such as olverembatinib and asciminib, or for patients who developed resistance due to other mutations, such as vodobatinib. Most of new TKIs are selected among compounds tested selective on ABL, therefore without possible off-target effects in the long term. New potential treatments are on the horizon in the field of CML, able to rescue patients treated firstly with one or more second-generation TKIs. Results of ongoing trials and real-world evidence dataset will help us to identify the appropriate timing of intervention and to select appropriate candidate to these drugs.

Droplet digital PCR for the detection of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia

One of the indications for BCR::ABL1 mutation testing in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is when tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (TKI) needs to be changed for unsatisfactory response. In this study, we evaluated a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based multiplex strategy for the detection and quantitation of transcripts harbouring mutations conferring resistance to second-generation TKIs (2GTKIs). Parallel quantitation of e13a2, e14a2 and e1a2 BCR::ABL1 fusion transcripts enables to express results as percentage of mutation positive- over total BCR::ABL1 transcripts. We determined the limit of blank in 60 mutation-negative samples. Accuracy was demonstrated by further analysis of 48 samples already studied by next generation sequencing (NGS). Mutations could be called down to 0.5% and across 3-logs of BCR::ABL1 levels. Retrospective review of BCR::ABL1 NGS results in 513 consecutive CML patients with non-optimal response to first- or second-line TKI therapy suggested that a ddPCR-based approach targeted against 2GTKI-resistant mutations would score samples as mutation-negative in 22% of patients with warning response to imatinib but only in 6% of patients with warning response to 2GTKIs. We conclude ddPCR represents an attractive method for easy, accurate and rapid screening for 2GTKI-resistant mutations impacting on TKI selection, although ddPCR cannot identify compound mutations.

Development of Asciminib, a Novel Allosteric Inhibitor of BCR-ABL1

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is driven by a translocation event between chromosomes 9 and 22, leading to the formation of a constitutively active BCR-ABL1 oncoprotein. Approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for CML inhibit BCR-ABL1 by competitively targeting its adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-binding site, which significantly improves patient outcomes. However, resistance to and intolerance of TKIs remains a clinical challenge. Asciminib is a promising investigational agent in development that allosterically targets BCR-ABL1 in a non-ATP-competitive manner. It binds to the ABL1 myristoyl-binding pocket and is effective against most ABL1 kinase domain mutations that confer resistance to ATP-competitive TKIs, including the T315I mutation. This review discusses unmet needs in the current CML treatment landscape, reports clinical data from asciminib trials that support the use of single-agent asciminib as third-line therapy and beyond, and explores the potential benefit of asciminib in combination with approved TKIs in earlier lines.

Overcoming Resistance to Kinase Inhibitors: The Paradigm of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Protein kinases (PKs) play crucial roles in cellular proliferation and survival, hence their deregulation is a common event in the pathogenesis of solid and hematologic malignancies. Targeting PKs has been a promising strategy in cancer treatment, and there are now a variety of approved anticancer drugs targeting PKs. However, the phenomenon of resistance remains an obstacle to be addressed and overcoming resistance is a goal to be achieved. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is the first as well as one of the best examples of a cancer that can be targeted by molecular therapy; hence, it can be used as a model disease for other cancers. This review aims to summarize up-to-date knowledge on the main mechanisms implicated in resistance to PK inhibitory therapies and to outline the main strategies that are being explored to overcome resistance. The importance of molecular diagnostics and disease monitoring in counteracting resistance will also be discussed.

Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point?

Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) and BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation testing have a well consolidated role in the routine management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, as they provide precious information for therapeutic decision-making. Molecular response levels are used to define whether a patient has an "optimal", "warning", or "failure" response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Mutation status may be useful to decide whether TKI therapy should be changed and which alternative TKI (or TKIs) are most likely to be effective. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-qPCR) and Sanger sequencing are currently the gold standard for molecular response monitoring and mutation testing, respectively. However, in recent years, novel technologies such as digital PCR (dPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been evaluated. Here, we critically describe the main features of these old and novel technologies, provide an overview of the recently published studies assessing the potential clinical value of dPCR and NGS, and discuss how the state of the art might evolve in the next years.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by the presence of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) which results from a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 [t(9;22] that gives rise to a BCR-ABL1 fusion gene. CML occurs in 3 different phases (chronic, accelerated, and blast phase) and is usually diagnosed in the chronic phase. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is a highly effective first-line treatment option for all patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML. This manuscript discusses the recommendations outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with chronic phase CML.

Next-generation sequencing for BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation testing in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a position paper

BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation status is considered to be an important element of clinical decision algorithms for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who do not achieve an optimal response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Conventional Sanger sequencing is the method currently recommended to test BCR-ABL1 KD mutations. However, Sanger sequencing has limited sensitivity and cannot always discriminate between polyclonal and compound mutations. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly widespread in diagnostic laboratories and represents an attractive alternative. Currently available data on the clinical impact of NGS-based mutational testing in CML patients do not allow recommendations with a high grade of evidence to be prepared. This article reports the results of a group discussion among an ad hoc expert panel with the objective of producing recommendations on the appropriateness of clinical decisions about the indication for NGS, the performance characteristics of NGS platforms, and the therapeutic changes that could be applied based on the use of NGS in CML. Overall, these recommendations might be employed to inform clinicians about the practical use of NGS in CML.

Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Advanced Phase

Management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in advanced phases remains a challenge also in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. Cytogenetic clonal evolution and development of resistant mutations represent crucial events that limit the benefit of subsequent therapies in these patients. CML is diagnosed in accelerated (AP) or blast phase (BP) in <5% of patients, and the availability of effective treatments for chronic phase (CP) has dramatically reduced progressions on therapy. Due to smaller number of patients, few randomized studies are available in this setting and evidences are limited. Nevertheless, three main scenarios may be drawn: (a) patients diagnosed in AP are at higher risk of failure as compared to CP patients, but if they achieve optimal responses with frontline TKI treatment their outcome may be similarly favorable; (b) patients diagnosed in BP may be treated with TKI alone or with TKI together with conventional chemotherapy regimens, and subsequent transplant decisions should rely on kinetics of response and individual transplant risk; (c) patients in CP progressing under TKI treatment represent the most challenging population and they should be treated with alternative TKI according to the mutational profile, optional chemotherapy in BP patients, and transplant should be considered in suitable cases after return to second CP. Due to lack of validated and reliable markers to predict blast crisis and the still unsatisfactory results of treatments in this setting, prevention of progression by careful selection of frontline treatment in CP and early treatment intensification in non-optimal responders remains the main goal. Personalized evaluation of response kinetics could help in identifying patients at risk for progression.

[Recommendations from the French CML Study Group (Fi-LMC) for BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia]

In the context of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations still remain the sole biological marker that directly condition therapeutic decision. These recommendations aim at updating the use of BCR-ABL1 mutation testing with respect to new available therapeutic options and at repositioning different testing methods at the era of next generation sequencing (NGS). They have been written by a panel of experts from the French Study Group on CML (Fi-LMC), after a critical review of relevant publications. TKD mutation testing is recommended in case of treatment failure but not in case of optimal response. For patients in warning situation, mutation testing must be discussed depending on the type of TKI used, lasting of the treatment, kinetic evolution of BCR-ABL1 transcripts along time and necessity for switching treatment. The kind and the frequency of TKD mutations occasioning resistance mainly depend on the TKI in use and disease phase. Because of its better sensitivity, NGS methods are recommended for mutation testing rather than Sanger's. Facing a given TKD mutation, therapeutic decision should be taken based on in vitro sensitivity and clinical efficacy data. Identification by sequencing of a TKD mutation known to induce resistance must lead to a therapeutic change. The clinical value of testing methods more sensitive than NGS remains to be assessed.

Incidence and outcome of BCR-ABL mutated chronic myeloid leukemia patients who failed to tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Purpose

To assess the incidence of BCR‐ABL kinase domain (KD) mutation detection and its prognostic significance in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP‐CML) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Patients and Methods

We analyzed characteristics and outcome of 253 CP‐CML patients who had at least one mutation analysis performed using direct sequencing. Of them, 187 patients were early CP (ECP) and 66 were late CP late chronic phase (LCP) and 88% were treated with Imatinib as first‐line TKI.

Results

Overall, 80 (32%) patients harbored BCR‐ABL KD mutations. A BCR‐ABL KD mutation was identified in 57% of patients, who progressed to accelerated or blastic phases (AP‐BP), and 47%, 29%, 35%, 16% and 26% in patients in CP‐CML at the time of mutation analysis who lost a complete hematologic response, failed to achieve or loss of a prior complete cytogenetic and major molecular response, respectively.

Overall survival and cumulative incidence of CML‐related death were significantly correlated with the disease phase whatever the absence or presence of a mutation was and for the latter the mutation subgroup (T315I vs P‐loop vs non‐T315I non‐P‐loop) (P<.001). Considering patients who were in CP at the time of mutation analysis, LCP mutated patients had a significantly worse outcome than ECP‐mutated patients despite a lower incidence of T315I and P‐loop mutations (P<.001). With a median follow‐up from mutation analysis to last follow‐up of 5 years, T315I and P‐loop mutations were not associated with a worse outcome in ECP patients (P = .817).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that early mutation detection together with accessibility to 2nd and 3rd generation TKIs have reversed the worst outcome associated with BCR‐ABL KD mutations whatever the mutation subgroup in CP‐CML patients.

The WNT Pathway Is Relevant for the BCR-ABL1-Independent Resistance in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Notwithstanding the introduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) revolutionized the outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), one third of patients still suspends treatment for failure response. Recent research demonstrated that several BCR/ABL1-independent mechanisms can sustain resistance, but the relationship between these mechanisms and the outcome has not yet been fully understood. This study was designed to evaluate in a “real-life” setting if a change of expression of several genes involved in the WNT/BETA-CATENIN, JAK-STAT, and POLYCOMB pathways might condition the outcome of CML patients receiving TKIs. Thus, the expression of 255 genes, related to the aforementioned pathways, was measured by quantitative PCR after 6 months of therapy and compared with levels observed at diagnosis in 11 CML patients, in order to find possible correlations with quality of response to treatment and event-free-survival (EFS). These results were then re-analyzed by the principal component method (PCA) for tempting to better cluster resistant cases. After 12 months of therapy, 6 patients achieved an optimal response and 5 were “resistant;” after application of both statistical methods, it was evident that in all pathways a significant overall up-regulation occurred, and that WNT was the pathway mostly responsible for the TKIs resistance. Indeed, 100% of patients with a “low” up-regulation of this pathway achieved an optimal response vs. 33% of those who showed a “high” gene over-expression (p = 0.016). Analogously, the 24-months EFS resulted significantly influenced by the degree of up-regulation of the WNT signaling: all patients with a “low” up-regulation were event-free vs. 33% of those who presented a “high” gene expression (p = 0.05). In particular, the PCA analysis confirmed the role of WNT pathway and showed that the most significantly up-regulated genes with negative prognostic value were DKK, WNT6, WISP1, and FZD8. In conclusion, our results sustain the need of a wide and multitasking approach in order to understand the resistance mechanisms in CML.

The Polycomb BMI1 Protein Is Co-expressed With CD26+ in Leukemic Stem Cells of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

The Polycomb gene BMI1 expression exerts a negative predictive impact on several hematological malignancies, such as acute and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), myelofibrosis, and follicular lymphoma. As already demonstrated in CML, BMI1 is responsible for the resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in a BCR-ABL1-independent way. Even if, it is unknown where BMI1 in CML is expressed (in progenitors or more mature cells). We decided, therefore, to evaluate if and where the BMI1 protein is located, focusing mainly on the CD34+/CD38-/CD26+ CML progenitors. To begin we measured, by flow cytometry, the proportion of CD34+/CD26+ cells in 31 bone marrow samples from 20 CML patients, at diagnosis and during treatment with imatinib. After that the bone marrow blood smears were stained with antibodies anti-CD26, BCR-ABL1, and BMI1. These smears were observed by a confocal laser microscope and a 3D reconstruction was then performed. At diagnosis, CD34+/CD26+ cells median value/μL was 0.48; this number increased from diagnosis to the third month of therapy and then reduced during treatment with imatinib. The number and behavior of the CD26+ progenitors were independent from the BCR-ABL1 expression, but they summed up what previously observed about the BMI1 expression modulation. In this work we demonstrate for the first time that in CML the BMI1 protein is co-expressed with BCR-ABL1 only in the cytoplasm of the CD26+ precursors; on the contrary, in other hematological malignancies where BMI1 is commonly expressed (follicular lymphoma, essential thrombocytemia, acute myeloid leukemia), it was not co-localized with CD26 or, obviously, with BCR-ABL1. Once translated into the clinical context, if BMI1 is a marker of stemness, our results would suggest the combination of the BMI1 inhibitors with TKIs as an interesting object of research, and, probably, as a promising way to overcome resistance in CML patients.

Deep sequencing of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is the current treatment of choice for patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) leading to rapid and durable hematological as well as molecular responses. However, emergence of resistance to TKIs has been the major obstacle to treatment success on long term. In this regard kinase domain mutations are the most common mechanism of therapy failure. In this study, we analyzed peripheral blood samples from 17 CML patients who had developed resistance to various TKIs by using next-generation sequencing parallel to Sanger sequencing. BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations have been found in 59% of the cohort. Our results demonstrate that next-generation sequencing results in a higher mutational detection rate than reported with conventional sequencing methodology. Furthermore, it showed the clonal diversity more accurately.

Current paradigms in the management of Philadelphia chromosome positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults

Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a biologically, clinically, and genetically distinct subtype of precursor-B ALL. The Ph chromosome, results from a reciprocal translocation of the ABL1 kinase gene on chromosome 9 to the breakpoint cluster region (BCR) gene on chromosome 22. Depending on the translocation breakpoint, typically a p210 BCR-ABL1 or a p190 BCR-ABL onc protein are generated; both are constitutively active tyrosine kinases that play a central role to alter signaling pathways of cell proliferation, survival, and self-renewal, leading to leukemogenesis. In Ph-positive ALL, the p190-BCR-ABL (minor [m]-bcr) subtype is more frequent than the p210-BCR-ABL (major [M]-bcr) subtype, commonly found in chronic myeloid leukemia. The Philadelphia chromosome is the most frequent recurrent cytogenetic abnormality in elderly patients with ALL. Its incidence increases with age, reaching ∼50% in patients with ALL aged 60 years and over. Patients traditionally had a very poor outcome with chemotherapy, particularly if they do not undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in first complete remission (CR1). With the availability of multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), the therapeutic armamentarium is expanding quickly. However, there is no consensus on how to best treat Ph-positive ALL. With modern therapy, improved outcomes have led to the emergence of a number of controversies, including the need for intensive chemotherapy, the ideal TKI, and whether all eligible patients should receive an allo-HSCT, and if so, what type. Here, we discuss these controversies in light of the available literature.