1
|
Galldiks N, Lohmann P, Friedrich M, Werner JM, Stetter I, Wollring MM, Ceccon G, Stegmayr C, Krause S, Fink GR, Law I, Langen KJ, Tonn JC. PET imaging of gliomas: Status quo and quo vadis? Neuro Oncol 2024:noae078. [PMID: 38970818 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PET imaging, particularly using amino acid tracers, has become a valuable adjunct to anatomical MRI in the clinical management of patients with glioma. Collaborative international efforts have led to the development of clinical and technical guidelines for PET imaging in gliomas. The increasing readiness of statutory health insurance agencies, especially in European countries, to reimburse amino acid PET underscores its growing importance in clinical practice. Integrating artificial intelligence and radiomics in PET imaging of patients with glioma may significantly improve tumor detection, segmentation, and response assessment. Efforts are ongoing to facilitate the clinical translation of these techniques. Considerable progress in computer technology developments (eg quantum computers) may be helpful to accelerate these efforts. Next-generation PET scanners, such as long-axial field-of-view PET/CT scanners, have improved image quality and body coverage and therefore expanded the spectrum of indications for PET imaging in Neuro-Oncology (eg PET imaging of the whole spine). Encouraging results of clinical trials in patients with glioma have prompted the development of PET tracers directing therapeutically relevant targets (eg the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase) for novel anticancer agents in gliomas to improve response assessment. In addition, the success of theranostics for the treatment of extracranial neoplasms such as neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer has currently prompted efforts to translate this approach to patients with glioma. These advancements highlight the evolving role of PET imaging in Neuro-Oncology, offering insights into tumor biology and treatment response, thereby informing personalized patient care. Nevertheless, these innovations warrant further validation in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Michel Friedrich
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Isabelle Stetter
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael M Wollring
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carina Stegmayr
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Sandra Krause
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holzgreve A, Nitschmann A, Maier SH, Büttner M, Schönecker S, Marschner SN, Fleischmann DF, Corradini S, Belka C, la Fougère C, Bodensohn R, Albert NL, Niyazi M. FET PET-based target volume delineation for the radiotherapy of glioblastoma: A pictorial guide to help overcome methodological pitfalls. Radiother Oncol 2024; 198:110386. [PMID: 38880414 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
PET is increasingly used for target volume definition in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma, as endorsed by the 2023 ESTRO-EANO guidelines. In view of its growing adoption into clinical practice and upcoming PET-based multi-center trials, this paper aims to assist in overcoming common pitfalls of FET PET-based target delineation in glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA.
| | - Alexander Nitschmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian H Maier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Marcel Büttner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Schönecker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Daniel F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cuccia F, Jafari F, D’Alessandro S, Carruba G, Craparo G, Tringali G, Blasi L, Ferrera G. Preferred Imaging for Target Volume Delineation for Radiotherapy of Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Literature Review of the Available Evidence. J Pers Med 2024; 14:538. [PMID: 38793120 PMCID: PMC11122491 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14050538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrence in glioblastoma lacks a standardized treatment, prompting an exploration of re-irradiation's efficacy. METHODS A comprehensive systematic review from January 2005 to May 2023 assessed the role of MRI sequences in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation. The search criteria, employing MeSH terms, targeted English-language, peer-reviewed articles. The inclusion criteria comprised both retrospective and prospective studies, excluding certain types and populations for specificity. The PICO methodology guided data extraction, and the statistical analysis employed Chi-squared tests via MedCalc v22.009. RESULTS Out of the 355 identified studies, 81 met the criteria, involving 3280 patients across 65 retrospective and 16 prospective studies. The key findings indicate diverse treatment modalities, with linac-based photons predominating. The median age at re-irradiation was 54 years, and the median time interval between radiation courses was 15.5 months. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were favored for target delineation, with PET-imaging used in fewer studies. Re-irradiation was generally well tolerated (median G3 adverse events: 3.5%). The clinical outcomes varied, with a median 1-year local control rate of 61% and a median overall survival of 11 months. No significant differences were noted in the G3 toxicity and clinical outcomes based on the MRI sequence preference or PET-based delineation. CONCLUSIONS In the setting of recurrent glioblastoma, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences were preferred for target delineation, allowing clinicians to deliver a safe and effective therapeutic option; amino acid PET imaging may represent a useful device to discriminate radionecrosis from recurrent disease. Future investigations, including the ongoing GLIAA, NOA-10, ARO 2013/1 trial, will aim to refine approaches and standardize methodologies for improved outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma re-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cuccia
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy (G.F.)
| | - Fatemeh Jafari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex, Teheran University of Medical Sciences, Teheran 1416634793, Iran
| | | | - Giuseppe Carruba
- Division of Internationalization and Health Research (SIRS), ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy
| | | | | | - Livio Blasi
- Medical Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Ferrera
- Radiation Oncology, ARNAS Civico Hospital, 90100 Palermo, Italy (G.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Latreche A, Dissaux G, Querellou S, Mazouz Fatmi D, Lucia F, Bordron A, Vu A, Touati R, Nguyen V, Hamya M, Dissaux B, Bourbonne V. Correlation between rCBV Delineation Similarity and Overall Survival in a Prospective Cohort of High-Grade Gliomas Patients: The Hidden Value of Multimodal MRI? Biomedicines 2024; 12:789. [PMID: 38672146 PMCID: PMC11048661 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The accuracy of target delineation in radiation treatment planning of high-grade gliomas (HGGs) is crucial to achieve high tumor control, while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the standard imaging modality for delineation of gliomas with inherent limitations in accurately determining the microscopic extent of tumors. The purpose of this study was to assess the survival impact of multi-observer delineation variability of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and [18F]-FET PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty prospectively included patients with histologically confirmed HGGs underwent a PET/CT and mpMRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI: b0, b1000, ADC), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1-Gado), T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2Flair), and perfusion-weighted imaging with computation of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and K2 maps. Nine radiation oncologists delineated the PET/CT and MRI sequences. Spatial similarity (Dice similarity coefficient: DSC) was calculated between the readers for each sequence. Impact of the DSC on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. RESULTS The highest DSC mean values were reached for morphological sequences, ranging from 0.71 +/- 0.18 to 0.84 +/- 0.09 for T2Flair and T1Gado, respectively, while metabolic volumes defined by PET/CT achieved a mean DSC of 0.75 +/- 0.11. rCBV variability (mean DSC0.32 +/- 0.20) significantly impacted PFS (p = 0.02) and OS (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that the T1-Gado and T2Flair sequences were the most reproducible sequences, followed by PET/CT. Reproducibility for functional sequences was low, but rCBV inter-reader similarity significantly impacted PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amina Latreche
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (A.L.); (G.D.); (F.L.); (A.B.); (A.V.); (V.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Gurvan Dissaux
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (A.L.); (G.D.); (F.L.); (A.B.); (A.V.); (V.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Solène Querellou
- Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France;
- Groupe d’Etude de la Thrombose Occidentale GETBO (INSERM UMR 1304), Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 29200 Brest, France
| | | | - François Lucia
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (A.L.); (G.D.); (F.L.); (A.B.); (A.V.); (V.N.); (M.H.)
- LaTIM UMR 1101, INSERM, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 29200 Brest, France
| | - Anais Bordron
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (A.L.); (G.D.); (F.L.); (A.B.); (A.V.); (V.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Alicia Vu
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (A.L.); (G.D.); (F.L.); (A.B.); (A.V.); (V.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Ruben Touati
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (A.L.); (G.D.); (F.L.); (A.B.); (A.V.); (V.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Victor Nguyen
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (A.L.); (G.D.); (F.L.); (A.B.); (A.V.); (V.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Mohamed Hamya
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (A.L.); (G.D.); (F.L.); (A.B.); (A.V.); (V.N.); (M.H.)
| | - Brieg Dissaux
- Groupe d’Etude de la Thrombose Occidentale GETBO (INSERM UMR 1304), Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 29200 Brest, France
- Radiology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France;
| | - Vincent Bourbonne
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, 29200 Brest, France; (A.L.); (G.D.); (F.L.); (A.B.); (A.V.); (V.N.); (M.H.)
- LaTIM UMR 1101, INSERM, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 29200 Brest, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pepper NB, Eich HT, Müther M, Oertel M, Rehn S, Spille DC, Stummer W. ALA-RDT in GBM: protocol of the phase I/II dose escalation trial of radiodynamic therapy with 5-Aminolevulinic acid in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:11. [PMID: 38254201 PMCID: PMC10804590 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02408-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite improvements in surgical as well as adjuvant therapies over the last decades, the prognosis for patients with glioblastoma remains poor. Five-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) induced porphyrins are already used for fluorescence-guided resection and as photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. New findings reveal their potential use as sensitizing agents in combination with ionizing radiation. METHODS We initiated a phase I/II dose escalation study, treating patients with recurrence of glioblastoma with oral 5-ALA concurrent to radiotherapy (RT). This prospective single-center study based in the University Hospital Münster aims to recruit 30 patients over 18 years of age with histologically verified recurrence of supratentorial glioblastoma in good performance status (KPS ≥ 60). Following a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, patients having undergone re-resection will receive a 36 Gy RT including radiodynamic therapy fractions (RDT). RDT constitutes of oral administration of 5-ALA before the irradiation session. Two cohorts will additionally receive two fractions of neoadjuvant treatment three and two days before surgery. To determine the maximum tolerated dose of repeated 5-ALA-administration, the number of RDT-fractions will increase, starting with one to a maximum of eight fractions, while closely monitoring for safety and toxicity. Follow-up will be performed at two and five months after treatment. Primary endpoint will be the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of repeated ALA-administration, secondary endpoints are event-free-, progression-free-, and overall-survival. Additionally, 5-ALA metabolites and radiobiological markers will be analysed throughout the course of therapy and tissue effects after neoadjuvant treatment will be determined in resected tissue. This protocol is in accordance with the SPIRIT guidelines for clinical trial protocols. DISCUSSION This is the protocol of the ALA-RDT in GBM-study, the first-in-man evaluation of repeated administration of 5-ALA as a radiosensitizer for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical Association of Westphalia-Lippe and the University of Münster on 12.10.2022, the German federal institute for Drugs and medical devices on 13.10.2022 and the federal office for radiation protection on 29.08.2022. This trial was registered on the public European EudraCT database (EudraCT-No.: 2021-004631-92) and is registered under www.cliniclatrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05590689).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Benedikt Pepper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Müther
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Stephan Rehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Dorothee Cäcilia Spille
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, Building A1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laprie A, Noel G, Chaltiel L, Truc G, Sunyach MP, Charissoux M, Magne N, Auberdiac P, Biau J, Ken S, Tensaouti F, Khalifa J, Sidibe I, Roux FE, Vieillevigne L, Catalaa I, Boetto S, Uro-Coste E, Supiot S, Bernier V, Filleron T, Mounier M, Poublanc M, Olivier P, Delord JP, Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal E. Randomized phase III trial of metabolic imaging-guided dose escalation of radio-chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (SPECTRO GLIO trial). Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:153-163. [PMID: 37417948 PMCID: PMC10768994 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) systematically recurs after a standard 60 Gy radio-chemotherapy regimen. Since magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) has been shown to predict the site of relapse, we analyzed the effect of MRSI-guided dose escalation on overall survival (OS) of patients with newly diagnosed GBM. METHODS In this multicentric prospective phase III trial, patients who had undergone biopsy or surgery for a GBM were randomly assigned to a standard dose (SD) of 60 Gy or a high dose (HD) of 60 Gy with an additional simultaneous integrated boost totaling 72 Gy to MRSI metabolic abnormalities, the tumor bed and residual contrast enhancements. Temozolomide was administered concomitantly and maintained for 6 months thereafter. RESULTS One hundred and eighty patients were included in the study between March 2011 and March 2018. After a median follow-up of 43.9 months (95% CI [42.5; 45.5]), median OS was 22.6 months (95% CI [18.9; 25.4]) versus 22.2 months (95% CI [18.3; 27.8]) for HD, and median progression-free survival was 8.6 (95% CI [6.8; 10.8]) versus 7.8 months (95% CI [6.3; 8.6]), in SD versus HD, respectively. No increase in toxicity rate was observed in the study arm. The pseudoprogression rate was similar across the SD (14.4%) and HD (16.7%) groups. For O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) methylated patients, the median OS was 38 months (95% CI [23.2; NR]) for HD patients versus 28.5 months (95% CI [21.1; 35.7]) for SD patients. CONCLUSION The additional MRSI-guided irradiation dose totaling 72 Gy was well tolerated but did not improve OS in newly diagnosed GBM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01507506; registration date: December 20, 2011. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01507506?cond=NCT01507506&rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Laprie
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Leonor Chaltiel
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Gilles Truc
- Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | | | - Nicolas Magne
- Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | | | - Julian Biau
- Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Soléakhéna Ken
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, RadOpt-CRCT-INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Fatima Tensaouti
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole & ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Franck-Emmanuel Roux
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Laure Vieillevigne
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Sergio Boetto
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Emmanuelle Uro-Coste
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, RadOpt-CRCT-INSERM, Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Institut de Cancerologie de l’Ouest, Nantes st Herblain, France
| | - Valérie Bernier
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine Centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France
| | - Thomas Filleron
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Muriel Mounier
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Muriel Poublanc
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascale Olivier
- Service de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique, Centre Régional de Pharmacovigilance, de Pharmacoépidémiologie et d’Information sur le Médicament CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Delord
- Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fleischmann DF, Büttner M, Unterrainer M, Corradini S, Zollner B, Hofmaier J, Bodensohn R, Thon N, Belka C, Bartenstein P, Albert NL, Niyazi M. High-Grade Glioma Radiation Therapy and Reirradiation Treatment Planning Using Translocator Protein Positron Emission Tomography With 18F-GE-180. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101185. [PMID: 36896209 PMCID: PMC9991534 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Translocator protein (TSPO) positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-GE-180 shows high tumor-to-brain contrast in high-grade glioma (HGG), even in areas without magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement. Until now, the benefit of 18F-GE-180 PET in primary radiation therapy (RT) and reirradiation (reRT) treatment planning for patients with HGG has not been assessed. Methods and Materials The possible benefit of 18F-GE-180 PET in RT and reRT planning was retrospectively evaluated through post hoc spatial correlations of PET-based biological tumor volumes (BTVs) with conventional MRI-based consensus gross tumor volumes (cGTVs). To find the ideal threshold for BTV definition in RT and reRT treatment planning, tumor-to-background activity thresholds of 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 were applied. Spatial overlap of PET- and MRI-based tumor volumes was measured by the Sørensen-Dice coefficient (SDC) and the conformity index (CI). Additionally, the minimal margin to include the entire BTV into the expanded cGTV was determined. Results Thirty-five primary RT and 16 reRT cases were examined. BTV1.6, BTV1.8, and BTV2.0 were significantly larger than corresponding cGTV volumes in primary RT (median volumes: 67.4, 50.7, and 39.1, respectively, vs 22.6 cm3; P < .001, P < .001, and P = .017, respectively; Wilcoxon test) and reRT cases (median volumes: 80.5, 55.0, and 41.6, respectively, vs 22.7 cm3; P = .001, P = .005, and P = .144, respectively; Wilcoxon test). BTV1.6, BTV1.8, and BTV2.0 showed low but increasing conformity with cGTVs in the primary RT (SDC: 0.51, 0.55, and 0.58, respectively; CI: 0.35, 0.38, and 0.41, respectively) and reRT setting (SDC: 0.38, 0.40, and 0.40, respectively; CI: 0.24, 0.25, and 0.25, respectively). The minimal margin required to include the BTV within the cGTV was significantly smaller in the RT versus the reRT setting for thresholds 1.6 and 1.8 but not significantly different for threshold 2.0 (median margin: 16, 12, and 10, respectively, vs 21.5, 17.5, and 13 mm, respectively; P = .007, P = .031, and P = .093, respectively; Mann-Whitney U test). Conclusions 18F-GE-180 PET provides valuable information in RT treatment planning for patients with HGG. 18F-GE-180-based BTVs with a threshold of 2.0 were most consistent in primary and reRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Felix Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marcel Büttner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Barbara Zollner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Hofmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Seidel C, Nicolay NH. [Re-irradiation and Bevacizumab - active combination for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma]. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:604-606. [PMID: 37079088 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02084-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Seidel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shariff M, Grigo J, Masitho S, Brandt T, Weiss A, Lambrecht U, Stillkrieg W, Lotter M, Putz F, Fietkau R, Bert C. End-to-end testing for stereotactic radiotherapy including the development of a Multi-Modality phantom. Z Med Phys 2022:S0939-3889(22)00123-4. [PMID: 36539322 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE A new insert for a commercially available end-to-end test phantom was designed and in-house manufactured by 3D printing. Subsequently, the insert was tested for different stereotactic radiation therapy workflows (SRS, SBRT, FSRT, and Multimet) also in comparison to the original insert. MATERIAL AND METHODS Workflows contained imaging (MR, CT), treatment planning, positioning, and irradiation. Positioning accuracy was evaluated for non-coplanar x-ray, kV- and MV-CBCT systems, as well as surface guided radiation therapy. Dosimetric accuracy of the irradiation was measured with an ionization chamber at four different linear accelerators including dynamic tumor tracking for SBRT. RESULTS CT parameters of the insert were within the specification. For MR images, the new insert allowed quantitative analysis of the MR distortion. Positioning accuracy of the phantom with the new insert using the imaging systems of the different linacs was < 1 mm/degree also for MV-CBCT and a non-coplanar imaging system which caused > 3 mm deviation with the original insert. Deviation of point dose values was <3% for SRS, FSRT, and SBRT for both inserts. For the Multimet plans deviations exceeded 10% because the ionization chamber was not positioned in each metastasis, but in the center of phantom and treatment plan. CONCLUSION The in-house manufactured insert performed well in all steps of four stereotactic treatment end-to-end tests. Advantages over the commercially available alternative were seen for quantitative analysis of deformation correction in MR images, applicability for non-coplanar x-ray imaging, and dynamic tumor tracking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Shariff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Johanna Grigo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Siti Masitho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tobias Brandt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Alexander Weiss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Lambrecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Willi Stillkrieg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Lotter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florian Putz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany; Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Impact of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy on activity of daily living and performance status in progressive/recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective study. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:201. [PMID: 36474245 PMCID: PMC9727986 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02169-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is poor, with limited options of palliative localized or systemic treatments. Survival can be improved by a second localized treatment; however, it is not currently possible to identify which patients would benefit from this approach. This study aims to evaluate which factors lead to a lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score after fractionated stereotactic RT (fSRT). METHODS We retrospectively collected data from patients treated with fSRT for recurrent GBM at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine between October 2010 and November 2017 and analyzed which factors were associated with a lower KPS score. RESULTS 59 patients received a dose of 25 Gy in 5 sessions spread over 5-7 days (80% isodose). The median time from the end of primary radiotherapy to the initiation of fSRT was 10.7 months. The median follow-up after fSRT initiation was 8.8 months. The incidence of KPS and ADL impairment in all patients were 51.9% and 37.8% respectively with an adverse impact of PTV size on KPS (HR = 1.57 [95% CI 1.19-2.08], p = 0.028). Only two patients showed early grade 3 toxicity and none showed grade 4 or late toxicity. The median overall survival time, median overall survival time after fSRT, median progression-free survival and institutionalization-free survival times were 25.8, 8.8, 3.9 and 7.7 months, respectively. Initial surgery was associated with better progression-free survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48 [95% CI 0.27-0.86], p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS A larger PTV should predicts lower KPS in the treatment of recurrent GBM using fSRT.
Collapse
|
11
|
Laprie A, Tensaouti F, Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E. [Radiation dose intensification for glioblastoma]. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:894-898. [PMID: 36085279 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most common brain tumor in adults; its treatment includes surgical excision or biopsy followed by radio-chemotherapy. Even if radiotherapy increases the survival of all patients regardless of their age or their general condition, there are always sources of radioresistance, where relapses occur and therefore treatment fails. Indeed, these foci result in a local relapse, which is observed in 95% of cases in the irradiation fields. We will describe here the current approaches to overcome this radioresistance by dose escalation, without or with guidance by metabolic and functional imaging (dose-painting). We will detail several prospective trials including the French phase III trial, SPECTRO-GLIO, randomizing the use of an integrated boost guided by spectrometric magnetic resonance imaging and similar trials developed across the Atlantic. We will also discuss approaches using different PET markers as well as diffusion or perfusion magnetic resonance imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Laprie
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex, France; Inserm Toulouse neuroimaging center (Tonic), place Baylac, 31000 Toulouse, France.
| | - F Tensaouti
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex, France; Inserm Toulouse neuroimaging center (Tonic), place Baylac, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - E Cohen-Jonathan Moyal
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, 1, avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059 Toulouse cedex, France; Inserm Radopt, CRCT, Centre de recherche en cancérologie de Toulouse, 2, avenue Hubert-Curien, 31100 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Waltenberger M, Furkel J, Röhrich M, Salome P, Debus C, Tawk B, Gahlawat AW, Kudak A, Dostal M, Wirkner U, Schwager C, Herold-Mende C, Combs SE, König L, Debus J, Haberkorn U, Abdollahi A, Knoll M. The impact of tumor metabolic activity assessed by 18F-FET amino acid PET imaging in particle radiotherapy of high-grade glioma patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:901390. [PMID: 36203443 PMCID: PMC9531169 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.901390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Selective uptake of (18)F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (18F-FET) is used in high-grade glioma (HGG) to assess tumor metabolic activity via positron emission tomography (PET). We aim to investigate its value for target volume definition, as a prognosticator, and associations with whole-blood transcriptome liquid biopsy (WBT lbx) for which we recently reported feasibility to mirror tumor characteristics and response to particle irradiation in recurrent HGG (rHGG). Methods 18F-FET-PET data from n = 43 patients with primary glioblastoma (pGBM) and n = 33 patients with rHGG were assessed. pGBM patients were irradiated with photons and sequential proton/carbon boost, and rHGG patients were treated with carbon re-irradiation (CIR). WBT (Illumina HumanHT-12 Expression BeadChips) lbx was available for n = 9 patients from the rHGG cohort. PET isocontours (40%–70% SUVmax, 10% steps) and MRI-based treatment volumes (MRIvol) were compared using the conformity index (CI) (pGBM, n = 16; rHGG, n = 27). Associations with WBT lbx data were tested on gene expression level and inferred pathways activity scores (PROGENy) and from transcriptome estimated cell fractions (CIBERSORT, xCell). Results In pGBM, median SUVmax was higher in PET acquired pre-radiotherapy (4.1, range (R) 1.5–7.8; n = 20) vs. during radiotherapy (3.3, R 1.5–5.7, n = 23; p = 0.03) and in non-resected (4.7, R 2.9–7.9; n = 11) vs. resected tumors (3.3, R 1.5–7.8, n = 32; p = 0.01). In rHGG, a trend toward higher SUVmax values in grade IV tumors was observed (p = 0.13). Median MRIvol was 32.34 (R 8.75–108.77) cm3 in pGBM (n = 16) and 20.77 (R 0.63–128.44) cm3 in rHGG patients (n = 27). The highest median CI was observed for 40% (pGBM, 0.31) and 50% (rHGG, 0.43, all tumors) isodose, with 70% (40%) isodose in grade III (IV) rHGG tumors (median CI, 0.38 and 0.49). High SUVmax was linked to shorter survival in pGBM (>3.3, p = 0.001, OR 6.0 [2.1–17.4]) and rHGG (>2.8, p = 0.02, OR 4.1 [1.2–13.9]). SUVmax showed associations with inferred monocyte fractions, hypoxia, and TGFbeta pathway activity and links to immune checkpoint gene expression from WBT lbx. Conclusion The benefits of 18F-FET-PET imaging on gross tumor volume (GTV) definition for particle radiotherapy warrant further evaluation. SUVmax might assist in prognostic stratification of HGG patients for particle radiotherapy, highlights heterogeneity in rHGG, and is positively associated with unfavorable signatures in peripheral whole-blood transcriptomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Waltenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jennifer Furkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Röhrich
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Salome
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Charlotte Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Steinbuch Centre for Computing (SCC), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
| | - Bouchra Tawk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aoife Ward Gahlawat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Kudak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Dostal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Wirkner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Schwager
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christel Herold-Mende
- Department of Experimental Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E. Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Knoll
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- *Correspondence: Maximilian Knoll,
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nardone V, Desideri I, D’Ambrosio L, Morelli I, Visani L, Di Giorgio E, Guida C, Clemente A, Belfiore MP, Cioce F, Spadafora M, Vinciguerra C, Mansi L, Reginelli A, Cappabianca S. Nuclear medicine and radiotherapy in the clinical management of glioblastoma patients. Clin Transl Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-022-00495-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The aim of the narrative review was to analyse the applications of nuclear medicine (NM) techniques such as PET/CT with different tracers in combination with radiotherapy for the clinical management of glioblastoma patients.
Materials and methods
Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used.
Results
This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of NM approaches in combination with radiotherapy in glioma patients.
Conclusions
NM can provide the Radiation Oncologist several aids that can be useful in the clinical management of glioblastoma patients. At the same, these results need to be validated in prospective and multicenter trials.
Collapse
|
14
|
Relapsing High—Grade Glioma from Peritumoral Zone: Critical Review of Radiotherapy Treatment Options. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12040416. [PMID: 35447948 PMCID: PMC9027370 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive brain tumor in adults, with a median survival of about 15 months. After the prior treatment, GBM tends to relapse within the high dose radiation field, defined as the peritumoral brain zone (PTZ), needing a second treatment. In the present review, the primary role of ionizing radiation in recurrent GBM is discussed, and the current literature knowledge about the different radiation modalities, doses and fractionation options at our disposal is summarized. Therefore, the focus is on the necessity of tailoring the treatment approach to every single patient and using radiomics and PET/MRI imaging to have a relatively good outcome and avoid severe toxicity. The use of charged particle therapy and radiosensitizers to overcome GBM radioresistance is considered, even if further studies are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness in the setting of reirradiation.
Collapse
|
15
|
García-Cabezas S, Rivin del Campo E, Solivera-Vela J, Palacios-Eito A. Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed? World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:767-786. [PMID: 34631441 PMCID: PMC8479348 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Optimal management after recurrence or progression of high-grade gliomas is still undefined and remains a challenge for neuro-oncology multidisciplinary teams. Improved radiation therapy techniques, new imaging methods, published experience, and a better radiobiological knowledge of brain tissue have positioned re-irradiation (re-RT) as an option for many of these patients. Decisions must be individualized, taking into account the pattern of relapse, previous treatment, and functional status, as well as the patient’s preferences and expected quality of life. Many questions remain unanswered with respect to re-RT: Who is the most appropriate candidate, which dose and fractionation are most effective, how to define the target volume, which imaging technique is best for planning, and what is the optimal timing? This review will focus on describing the most relevant studies that include re-RT as salvage therapy, with the aim of simplifying decision-making and designing the best available therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia García-Cabezas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | | | - Juan Solivera-Vela
- Department of Neurosurgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Amalia Palacios-Eito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fleischmann DF, Schön R, Corradini S, Bodensohn R, Hadi I, Hofmaier J, Forbrig R, Thon N, Dorostkar M, Belka C, Niyazi M. Multifocal high-grade glioma radiotherapy safety and efficacy. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:165. [PMID: 34454558 PMCID: PMC8400399 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01886-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multifocal manifestation of high-grade glioma is a rare disease with very unfavourable prognosis. The pathogenesis of multifocal glioma and pathophysiological differences to unifocal glioma are not fully understood. The optimal treatment of patients suffering from multifocal high-grade glioma is not defined in the current guidelines, therefore individual case series may be helpful as guidance for clinical decision-making. Methods Patients with multifocal high-grade glioma treated with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in our institution with or without concomitant chemotherapy between April 2011 and April 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Multifocality was neuroradiologically assessed and defined as at least two independent contrast-enhancing foci in the MRI T1 contrast-enhanced sequence. IDH mutational status and MGMT methylation status were assessed from histopathology records. GTV, PTV as well as the V30Gy, V45Gy and D2% volumes of the brain were analysed. Overall and progression-free survival were calculated from the diagnosis until death and from start of radiation therapy until diagnosis of progression of disease in MRI for all patients. Results 20 multifocal glioma cases (18 IDH wild-type glioblastoma cases, one diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH wild-type case with molecular features of glioblastoma and one anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH wild-type case) were included into the analysis. Resection was performed in two cases and stereotactic biopsy only in 18 cases before the start of radiation therapy. At the start of radiation therapy patients were 61 years old in median (range 42–84 years). Histopathological examination showed IDH wild-type in all cases and MGMT promotor methylation in 11 cases (55%). Prescription schedules were 60 Gy (2 Gy × 30), 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy × 33), 55 Gy (2.2 Gy × 25) and 50 Gy (2.5 Gy × 20) in 15, three, one and one cases, respectively. Concomitant temozolomide chemotherapy was applied in 16 cases, combined temozolomide/lomustine chemotherapy was applied in one case and concomitant bevacizumab therapy in one case. Median number of GTVs was three. Median volume of the sum of the GTVs was 26 cm3. Median volume of the PTV was 425.7 cm3 and median PTV to brain ratio 32.8 percent. Median D2% of the brain was 61.5 Gy (range 51.2–62.7) and median V30Gy and V45 of the brain were 59.9 percent (range 33–79.7) and 40.7 percent (range 14.9–64.1), respectively. Median survival was eight months (95% KI 3.6–12.4 months) and median progression free survival after initiation of RT five months (95% CI 2.8–7.2 months). Grade 2 toxicities were detected in eight cases and grade 3 toxicities in four cases consisting of increasing edema in three cases and one new-onset seizure. One grade 4 toxicity was detected, which was febrile neutropenia related to concomitant chemotherapy. Conclusion Conventionally fractionated RT with concomitant chemotherapy could safely be applied in multifocal high-grade glioma in this case series despite large irradiation treatment fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Felix Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rudolph Schön
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Indrawati Hadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan Hofmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Robert Forbrig
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Niklas Thon
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mario Dorostkar
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Galldiks N, Niyazi M, Grosu AL, Kocher M, Langen KJ, Law I, Minniti G, Kim MM, Tsien C, Dhermain F, Soffietti R, Mehta MP, Weller M, Tonn JC. Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients - a report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:881-893. [PMID: 33538838 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with glioma usually requires multimodality treatment including surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy. Accurate neuroimaging plays a central role for radiotherapy planning and follow-up after radiotherapy completion. In order to maximize the radiation dose to the tumor and to minimize toxic effects on the surrounding brain parenchyma, reliable identification of tumor extent and target volume delineation is crucial. The use of positron emission tomography (PET) for radiotherapy planning and monitoring in gliomas has gained considerable interest over the last several years, but Class I data are not yet available. Furthermore, PET has been used after radiotherapy for response assessment and to distinguish tumor progression from pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group provides a summary of the literature and recommendations for the use of PET imaging for radiotherapy of patients with glioma based on published studies, constituting levels 1-3 evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Cologne and Aachen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3,-4), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Cologne and Aachen, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, University Hospital Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Frederic Dhermain
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut de Cancerologie Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA.,Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg-Christian Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McBain C, Lawrie TA, Rogozińska E, Kernohan A, Robinson T, Jefferies S. Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 5:CD013579. [PMID: 34559423 PMCID: PMC8121043 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013579.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant brain tumour that almost inevitably progresses or recurs after first line standard of care. There is no consensus regarding the best treatment/s to offer people upon disease progression or recurrence. For the purposes of this review, progression and recurrence are considered as one entity. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effectiveness of further treatment/s for first and subsequent progression or recurrence of glioblastoma (GBM) among people who have received the standard of care (Stupp protocol) for primary treatment of the disease; and to prepare a brief economic commentary on the available evidence. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE and Embase electronic databases from 2005 to December 2019 and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, in the Cochrane Library; Issue 12, 2019). Economic searches included the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) up to 2015 (database closure) and MEDLINE and Embase from 2015 to December 2019. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative non-randomised studies (NRSs) evaluating effectiveness of treatments for progressive/recurrent GBM. Eligible studies included people with progressive or recurrent GBM who had received first line radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data to a pre-designed data extraction form. We conducted network meta-analyses (NMA) and ranked treatments according to effectiveness for each outcome using the random-effects model and Stata software (version 15). We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 42 studies: these comprised 34 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 non-randomised studies (NRSs) involving 5236 participants. We judged most RCTs to be at a low risk of bias and NRSs at high risk of bias. Interventions included chemotherapy, re-operation, re-irradiation and novel therapies either used alone or in combination. For first recurrence, we included 11 interventions in the network meta-analysis (NMA) for overall survival (OS), and eight in the NMA for progression-free survival (PFS). Lomustine (LOM; also known as CCNU) was the most common comparator and was used as the reference treatment. No studies in the NMA evaluated surgery, re-irradiation, PCV (procarbazine, lomustine, vincristine), TMZ re-challenge or best supportive care. We could not perform NMA for second or later recurrence due to insufficient data. Quality-of-life data were sparse. First recurrence (NMA findings) Median OS across included studies in the NMA ranged from 5.5 to 12.6 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 1.5 months to 4.2 months. We found no high-certainty evidence that any treatments tested were better than lomustine. These treatments included the following. Bevacizumab plus lomustine: Evidence suggested probably little or no difference in OS between bevacizumab (BEV) combined with lomustine (LOM) and LOM monotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 0.75 to 1.10; moderate-certainty evidence), although BEV + LOM may improve PFS (HR 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 0.74; low-certainty evidence). Bevacizumab monotherapy: Low-certainty evidence suggested there may be little or no difference in OS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.76) and PFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.38; low-certainty evidence) between BEV and LOM monotherapies; more evidence on BEV is needed. Regorafenib (REG): REG may improve OS compared with LOM (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.76; low-certainty evidence). Evidence on PFS was very low certainty and more evidence on REG is needed. Temozolomide (TMZ) plus Depatux-M (ABT414): For OS, low-certainty evidence suggested that TMZ plus ABT414 may be more effective than LOM (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.92) and may be more effective than BEV (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.89; low-certainty evidence). This may be due to the TMZ component only and more evidence is needed. Fotemustine (FOM): FOM and LOM may have similar effects on OS (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.57, low-certainty evidence). Bevacizumab and irinotecan (IRI): Evidence on BEV + irinotecan (IRI) versus LOM for both OS and PFS is very uncertain and there is probably little or no difference between BEV + IRI versus BEV monotherapy (OS: HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.30; moderate-certainty evidence). When treatments were ranked for OS, FOM ranked first, BEV + LOM second, LOM third, BEV + IRI fourth, and BEV fifth. Ranking does not take into account the certainty of the evidence, which also suggests there may be little or no difference between FOM and LOM. Other treatments Three studies evaluated re-operation versus no re-operation, with or without re-irradiation and chemotherapy, and these suggested possible survival advantages with re-operation within the context of being able to select suitable candidates for re-operation. A cannabinoid treatment in the early stages of evaluation, in combination with TMZ, merits further evaluation. Second or later recurrence Limited evidence from three heterogeneous studies suggested that radiotherapy with or without BEV may have a beneficial effect on survival but more evidence is needed. Evidence was insufficient to draw conclusions about the best radiotherapy dosage. Other evidence suggested that there may be little difference in survival with tumour-treating fields compared with physician's best choice of treatment. We found no reliable evidence on best supportive care. Severe adverse events (SAEs) The BEV+LOM combination was associated with significantly greater risk of SAEs than LOM monotherapy (RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.66, high-certainty evidence), and ranked joint worst with cediranib + LOM (RR 2.51, 95% CI 1.29 to 4.90; high-certainty evidence). LOM ranked best and REG ranked second best. Adding novel treatments to BEV was generally associated with a higher risk of severe adverse events compared with BEV alone. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS For treatment of first recurrence of GBM, among people previously treated with surgery and standard chemoradiotherapy, the combination treatments evaluated did not improve overall survival compared with LOM monotherapy and were often associated with a higher risk of severe adverse events. Limited evidence suggested that re-operation with or without re-irradiation and chemotherapy may be suitable for selected candidates. Evidence on second recurrence is sparse. Re-irradiation with or without bevacizumab may be of value in selected individuals, but more evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine McBain
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS FT, Manchester, UK
- Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Ashleigh Kernohan
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Tomos Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Sarah Jefferies
- Department of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Holzgreve A, Albert NL, Galldiks N, Suchorska B. Use of PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncological Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092093. [PMID: 33926002 PMCID: PMC8123649 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in neuro-oncological surgery is an exciting field with thriving perspectives. Increasing evidence exists for amino acid-based PET to facilitate interpretation of imaging findings following therapeutic interventions in patients with glioma and brain metastases. In meningioma patients, radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands provide an improved tumor tissue visualization in lesions located in the vicinity of the skull base and differentiate between scar tissue and tumor recurrence. Moreover, they can be applied as an individual treatment option in recurrent atypical and anaplastic meningioma not eligible for further surgery and radiotherapy. With a focus on its clinical application, this review provides an overview of the emerging field of PET imaging in neuro-oncological surgery. Abstract This review provides an overview of current applications and perspectives of PET imaging in neuro-oncological surgery. The past and future of PET imaging in the management of patients with glioma and brain metastases are elucidated with an emphasis on amino acid tracers, such as O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (18F-FET). The thematic scope includes surgical resection planning, prognostication, non-invasive prediction of molecular tumor characteristics, depiction of intratumoral heterogeneity, response assessment, differentiation between tumor progression and treatment-related changes, and emerging new tracers. Furthermore, the role of PET using specific somatostatin receptor ligands for the management of patients with meningioma is discussed. Further advances in neuro-oncological imaging can be expected from promising new techniques, such as hybrid PET/MR scanners and the implementation of artificial intelligence methods, such as radiomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (N.L.A.)
| | - Nathalie L. Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany; (A.H.); (N.L.A.)
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, 52425 Juelich, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Bogdana Suchorska
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sana Kliniken Duisburg, 47055 Duisburg, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-203-733-2401
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
The standard of care treatment for glioblastoma is surgical resection followed by radiotherapy to 60 Gy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide with or without tumor-treating fields. Advanced imaging techniques are under evaluation to better guide radiotherapy target volume delineation and allow for dose escalation. Particle therapy, in the form of protons, carbon ions, and boron neutron capture therapy, are being assessed as strategies to improve the radiotherapeutic ratio. Stereotactic, hypofractionated, pulsed-reduced dose-rate, and particle radiotherapy are re-irradiation techniques each uniquely suited for different clinical scenarios. Novel radiotherapy approaches, such as FLASH, represent promising advancements in radiotherapy for glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Martin C Tom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA; Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Castellano A, Bailo M, Cicone F, Carideo L, Quartuccio N, Mortini P, Falini A, Cascini GL, Minniti G. Advanced Imaging Techniques for Radiotherapy Planning of Gliomas. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051063. [PMID: 33802292 PMCID: PMC7959155 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The accuracy of target delineation in radiation treatment (RT) planning of cerebral gliomas is crucial to achieve high tumor control, while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, represents the current standard imaging modality for target volume delineation of gliomas. However, conventional sequences have limited capability to discriminate treatment-related changes from viable tumors, owing to the low specificity of increased blood-brain barrier permeability and peritumoral edema. Advanced physiology-based MRI techniques, such as MR spectroscopy, diffusion MRI and perfusion MRI, have been developed for the biological characterization of gliomas and may circumvent these limitations, providing additional metabolic, structural, and hemodynamic information for treatment planning and monitoring. Radionuclide imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) with amino acid radiopharmaceuticals, are also increasingly used in the workup of primary brain tumors, and their integration in RT planning is being evaluated in specialized centers. This review focuses on the basic principles and clinical results of advanced MRI and PET imaging techniques that have promise as a complement to RT planning of gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Castellano
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Michele Bailo
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, and Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital “Mater Domini”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0-961-369-4155
| | - Luciano Carideo
- National Cancer Institute, G. Pascale Foundation, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Natale Quartuccio
- A.R.N.A.S. Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, 90144 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Pietro Mortini
- Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (M.B.); (P.M.)
| | - Andrea Falini
- Neuroradiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.C.); (A.F.)
| | - Giuseppe Lucio Cascini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, and Nuclear Medicine Unit, University Hospital “Mater Domini”, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, 53100 Siena, Italy;
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli (IS), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Carles M, Popp I, Starke MM, Mix M, Urbach H, Schimek-Jasch T, Eckert F, Niyazi M, Baltas D, Grosu AL. FET-PET radiomics in recurrent glioblastoma: prognostic value for outcome after re-irradiation? Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:46. [PMID: 33658069 PMCID: PMC7931514 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01744-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The value of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET)-positron emission tomography (PET)-radiomics in the outcome assessment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) has not been evaluated until now.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a prognostic model based on FET-PET radiomics features (RF) is feasible and can identify rGBM patients that would most benefit from re-irradiation.
Methods We prospectively recruited rGBM patients who underwent FET-PET before re-irradiation (GLIAA-Pilot trial, DRKS00000633). Tumor volume was delineated using a semi-automatic method with a threshold of 1.8 times the standardized-uptake-value of the background. 135 FET-RF (histogram parameters, shape and texture features) were extracted. The analysis involved the characterization of tumor and non-tumor tissue with FET-RF and the evaluation of the prognostic value of FET-RF for time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and recurrence location (RL). Results Thirty-two rGBM patients constituted our cohort. FET-RF discriminated significantly between tumor and non-tumor. The texture feature Small-Zone-Low-Gray-Level-Emphasis (SZLGE) showed the best performance for the prediction of TTP (p = 0.001, satisfying Bonferroni-multiple-test significance level). Additionally, two radiomics signatures could predict TTP (TTP-radiomics-signature, p = 0.001) and OS (OS-radiomics-signature, p = 0.038). SZLGE and the TTP-radiomics-signature additionally predicted RL. Specifically, high values for TTP-radiomics-signature and for SZLGE indicated not only earlier progression, but also a RL within the initial FET-PET active volume. Conclusion Our findings suggest that FET-PET radiomics could contribute to the prognostic assessment and selection of rGBM-patients benefiting from re-irradiation. Trial registration DRKS00000633. Registered on 8th of December in 2010. https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00000633.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Montserrat Carles
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI), Imaging La Fe Node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), La Fe Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Ilinca Popp
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Maximilian Starke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Horst Urbach
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Schimek-Jasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Eckert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Cerman Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Str. 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Partner Site Freiburg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Minniti G, Niyazi M, Alongi F, Navarria P, Belka C. Current status and recent advances in reirradiation of glioblastoma. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:36. [PMID: 33602305 PMCID: PMC7890828 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01767-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite aggressive management consisting of maximal safe surgical resection followed by external beam radiation therapy (60 Gy/30 fractions) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, approximately 90% of WHO grade IV gliomas (glioblastomas, GBM) will recur locally within 2 years. For patients with recurrent GBM, no standard of care exists. Thanks to the continuous improvement in radiation science and technology, reirradiation has emerged as feasible approach for patients with brain tumors. Using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), either hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated schedules, several studies have suggested survival benefits following reirradiation of patients with recurrent GBM; however, there are still questions to be answered about the efficacy and toxicity associated with a second course of radiation. We provide a clinical overview on current status and recent advances in reirradiation of GBM, addressing relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate patient selection and radiation technique, optimal dose fractionation, reirradiation tolerance of the brain and the risk of radiation necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico le Scotte, 53100, Siena, Italy. .,IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Cancer Care Center, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, VR, Italy
| | - Piera Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital-IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ciernik IF, Gager Y, Renner C, Spieker S, Arndt N, Neumann K. Salvage Radiation Therapy for Patients With Relapsing Glioblastoma Multiforme and the Role of Slow Fractionation. Front Oncol 2020; 10:577443. [PMID: 33364191 PMCID: PMC7753368 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.577443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Salvage radiation therapy (SRT) can be offered to patients with relapsing glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Here we report our experience with a schedule extending the treatment time of SRT with the aim to prolong the cytotoxic effect of ionizing radiation while minimizing the cytotoxic hazards for the surrounding brain. Methods and Patients From 2009 until 2017, 124 of 218 patients received radical resection, adjuvant chemo-radiation with photons and temozolomide (TMZ) followed by adjuvant TMZ. Re-irradiation was performed in 26 patients due to local relapse. Treatment schedules varied. Survival and molecular markers were assessed. Results The median survival was respectively 12 months (9-14.5) of the 124 patients treated with tri-modal therapy and 19.2 months (14.9-24.6) for the 26 patients retreated with SRT (p=0.038). Patients who received daily fractions of 1,6 to 1,65 Gy to a total dose of >40 Gy had a median survival time of 24,6 months compared to patients treated with higher daily doses or a total dose of <40 Gy (p= 0.039), consistent with the observation that patients treated with 21-28 fractions had a median survival of 21,9 months compared to 15,8 months of patients who received 5-20 fractions (p=.0.05). Patients with Ki-67 expression of >30% seemed to perform better than patients with expression levels of ≤20% (p=0.03). MGMT methylation status, TERT promoter or ATRX mutations, overexpression of p53, p16, PD-L1, and EGFR were not prognostic. Conclusions Re-irradiation of relapsing GBM is a highly valid treatment option. Our observation challenges hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for retreatment and controlled trials on the fractionation dose for SRT are needed. Robust predictive molecular markers could be beneficial in the selection of patients for SRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Frank Ciernik
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, City Hospital, Dessau, Germany.,University of Zürich (MeF), Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Nicole Arndt
- General Pathology, Department of Pathology, City Hospital, Dessau, Germany
| | - Karsten Neumann
- Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, City Hospital, Dessau, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Spohn SKB, Kramer M, Kiefer S, Bronsert P, Sigle A, Schultze-Seemann W, Jilg CA, Sprave T, Ceci L, Fassbender TF, Nicolay NH, Ruf J, Grosu AL, Zamboglou C. Comparison of Manual and Semi-Automatic [ 18F]PSMA-1007 PET Based Contouring Techniques for Intraprostatic Tumor Delineation in Patients With Primary Prostate Cancer and Validation With Histopathology as Standard of Reference. Front Oncol 2020; 10:600690. [PMID: 33365271 PMCID: PMC7750498 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.600690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate contouring of intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) is pivotal for successful delivery of focal therapies and for biopsy guidance in patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa). Contouring of GTVs, using 18-Fluor labeled tracer prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography ([18F]PSMA-1007/PET) has not been examined yet. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ten Patients with primary PCa who underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET followed by radical prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled. Coregistered histopathological gross tumor volume (GTV-Histo) was used as standard of reference. PSMA-PET images were contoured on two ways: (1) manual contouring with PET scaling SUVmin-max: 0-10 was performed by three teams with different levels of experience. Team 1 repeated contouring at a different time point, resulting in n = 4 manual contours. (2) Semi-automatic contouring approaches using SUVmax thresholds of 20-50% were performed. Interobserver agreement was assessed for manual contouring by calculating the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and for all approaches sensitivity, specificity were calculated by dividing the prostate in each CT slice into four equal quadrants under consideration of histopathology as standard of reference. RESULTS Manual contouring yielded an excellent interobserver agreement with a median DSC of 0.90 (range 0.87-0.94). Volumes derived from scaling SUVmin-max 0-10 showed no statistically significant difference from GTV-Histo and high sensitivities (median 87%, range 84-90%) and specificities (median 96%, range 96-100%). GTVs using semi-automatic segmentation applying a threshold of 20-40% of SUVmax showed no significant difference in absolute volumes to GTV-Histo, GTV-SUV50% was significantly smaller. Best performing semi-automatic contour (GTV-SUV20%) achieved high sensitivity (median 93%) and specificity (median 96%). There was no statistically significant difference to SUVmin-max 0-10. CONCLUSION Manual contouring with PET scaling SUVmin-max 0-10 and semi-automatic contouring applying a threshold of 20% of SUVmax achieved high sensitivities and very high specificities and are recommended for [18F]PSMA-1007 PET based focal therapy approaches. Providing high specificities, semi-automatic approaches applying thresholds of 30-40% of SUVmax are recommend for biopsy guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon K. B. Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria Kramer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Selina Kiefer
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - August Sigle
- Department of Urology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann
- Department of Urology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Cordula A. Jilg
- Department of Urology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Sprave
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lara Ceci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas F. Fassbender
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Somme F, Bender L, Namer IJ, Noël G, Bund C. Usefulness of 18F-FDOPA PET for the management of primary brain tumors: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:70. [PMID: 33023662 PMCID: PMC7541204 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00348-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is currently the standard of care in the management of primary brain tumors, although certain limitations remain. Metabolic imaging has proven useful for an increasing number of indications in oncology over the past few years, most particularly 18F-FDG PET/CT. In neuro-oncology, 18F-FDG was insufficient to clearly evaluate brain tumors. Amino-acid radiotracers such as 18F-FDOPA were then evaluated in the management of brain diseases, notably tumoral diseases. Even though European guidelines on the use of amino-acid PET in gliomas have been published, it is crucial that future studies standardize acquisition and interpretation parameters. The aim of this article was to systematically review the potential effect of this metabolic imaging technique in numerous steps of the disease: primary and recurrence diagnosis, grading, local and systemic treatment assessment, and prognosis. A total of 41 articles were included and analyzed in this review. It appears that 18F-FDOPA PET holds promise as an effective additional tool in the management of gliomas. More consistent prospective studies are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Somme
- Nuclear medicine Department, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, F-67000, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Laura Bender
- Oncology Department, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Izzie Jacques Namer
- Nuclear medicine Department, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
- Strasbourg University, Unistra/CNRS UMR 7237, Strasbourg, France
| | - Georges Noël
- Radiotherapy Department, Paul Strauss Comprehensive Cancer Center, 3, rue de la porte de l'hôpital, F-67065, Strasbourg, France
- Strasbourg University, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Centre Paul Strauss, UNICANCER, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Caroline Bund
- Nuclear medicine Department, Hautepierre University Hospital, 1, rue Molière, F-67000, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Hybrid PET- MRI is a technique that has the ability to improve diagnostic accuracy in many applications, whereas PET and MRI performed separately often fail to provide accurate responses to clinical questions. Here, we review recent studies and current developments in PET-MRI, focusing on clinical applications. RECENT FINDINGS The combination of PET and MRI imaging methods aims at increasing the potential of each individual modality. Combined methods of image reconstruction and correction of PET-MRI attenuation are being developed, and a number of applications are being introduced into clinical practice. To date, the value of PET-MRI has been demonstrated for the evaluation of brain tumours in epilepsy and neurodegenerative diseases. Continued advances in data analysis regularly improve the efficiency and the potential application of multimodal biomarkers. SUMMARY PET-MRI provides simultaneous of anatomical, functional, biochemical and metabolic information for the personalized characterization and monitoring of neurological diseases. In this review, we show the advantage of the complementarity of different biomarkers obtained using PET-MRI data. We also present the recent advances made in this hybrid imaging modality and its advantages in clinical practice compared with MRI and PET separately.
Collapse
|
30
|
Fechter T, Baltas D. One-Shot Learning for Deformable Medical Image Registration and Periodic Motion Tracking. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2020; 39:2506-2517. [PMID: 32054571 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2020.2972616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Deformable image registration is a very important field of research in medical imaging. Recently multiple deep learning approaches were published in this area showing promising results. However, drawbacks of deep learning methods are the need for a large amount of training datasets and their inability to register unseen images different from the training datasets. One shot learning comes without the need of large training datasets and has already been proven to be applicable to 3D data. In this work we present a one shot registration approach for periodic motion tracking in 3D and 4D datasets. When applied to a 3D dataset the algorithm calculates the inverse of the registration vector field simultaneously. For registration we employed a U-Net combined with a coarse to fine approach and a differential spatial transformer module. The algorithm was thoroughly tested with multiple 4D and 3D datasets publicly available. The results show that the presented approach is able to track periodic motion and to yield a competitive registration accuracy. Possible applications are the use as a stand-alone algorithm for 3D and 4D motion tracking or in the beginning of studies until enough datasets for a separate training phase are available.
Collapse
|
31
|
Menon H, Guo C, Verma V, Simone CB. The Role of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Radiotherapy Target Delineation. PET Clin 2020; 15:45-53. [PMID: 31735301 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) is an advanced functional imaging modality in oncology care for the diagnosis, staging, prognostication, and surveillance of numerous malignancies. PET can also offer considerable advantages for target volume delineation as part of radiation treatment planning. In this review, data and clinical practice from 6 general oncology disease sites are assessed to descriptively evaluate the role of PET in target volume delineation. Also highlighted are several specific and practical utilities for PET imaging in radiation treatment planning. Publication of several ongoing prospective trials in the future may further expand the utility of PET for target delineation and patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hari Menon
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, 475 N 5th St, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
| | - Chunxiao Guo
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Vivek Verma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 E North Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Charles B Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, 225 East 126th Street, New York, NY 10035, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Unterrainer M, Eze C, Ilhan H, Marschner S, Roengvoraphoj O, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Walter F, Kunz WG, Rosenschöld PMA, Jeraj R, Albert NL, Grosu AL, Niyazi M, Bartenstein P, Belka C. Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:88. [PMID: 32317029 PMCID: PMC7171749 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01519-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and radiation oncology play a key role in the clinical management of patients suffering from oncological diseases. In clinical routine, anatomic imaging such as contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are widely available and are usually used to improve the target volume delineation for subsequent radiotherapy. Moreover, these modalities are also used for treatment monitoring after radiotherapy. However, some diagnostic questions cannot be sufficiently addressed by the mere use standard morphological imaging. Therefore, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging gains increasing clinical significance in the management of oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy, as PET allows the visualization and quantification of tumoral features on a molecular level beyond the mere morphological extent shown by conventional imaging, such as tumor metabolism or receptor expression. The tumor metabolism or receptor expression information derived from PET can be used as tool for visualization of tumor extent, for assessing response during and after therapy, for prediction of patterns of failure and for definition of the volume in need of dose-escalation. This review focuses on recent and current advances of PET imaging within the field of clinical radiotherapy / radiation oncology in several oncological entities (neuro-oncology, head & neck cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal tumors and prostate cancer) with particular emphasis on radiotherapy planning, response assessment after radiotherapy and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - C Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - S Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - O Roengvoraphoj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - F Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - P Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - R Jeraj
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
| | - N L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Müther M, Koch R, Weckesser M, Sporns P, Schwindt W, Stummer W. 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Fluorescence-Guided Resection of 18F-FET-PET Positive Tumor Beyond Gadolinium Enhancing Tumor Improves Survival in Glioblastoma. Neurosurgery 2020; 85:E1020-E1029. [PMID: 31215632 PMCID: PMC6855932 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of early postoperative 18F-FET-PET in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is unclear. Five-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is used for fluorescence-guided resections in these patients and previous data suggest that fluorescence and 18F-FET-PET both demarcate larger tumor volumes than gadolinium enhanced magnet resonance imaging (MRI). OBJECTIVE To correlate fluorescence with enhancing volumes on postoperative MRI and 18F-FET-PET tumor volumes, and determine the value of postoperative 18F-FET-PET for predicting survival through observational study. METHODS GBM patients underwent fluorescence-guided resection after administration of 5-ALA followed by early postoperative MRI and 18F-FET-PET for determination of residual tissue volumes. All patients were treated with standard temozolomide radiochemotherapy and monitored for progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). RESULTS A total of 31 patients were included. For functional reasons, residual 5-ALA derived fluorescent tissue was left unresected in 18 patients with a median 18F-FET-PET volume of 17.82 cm3 (interquartile range 6.50-29.19). In patients without residual fluorescence, median 18F-FET-PET volume was 1.20 cm3 (interquartile range 0.87-5.50) and complete resection of gadolinium enhancing tumor was observed in 100% of patients. A 18F-FET-PET volume of above 4.3 cm3 was associated with worse OS (logrank P-value ≤ .05), also in patients with no residual contrast enhancing tumor on MRI. More patients in whom fluorescencing tissue had been removed completely had postoperative 18F-FET-PET tumor volumes below 4.3 cm3. CONCLUSION Postoperative 18F-FET-PET volumes predict OS and PFS. Resection of 5-ALA derived fluorescence beyond gadolinium enhancing tumor tissue leads to lower postoperative 18F-FET-PET tumor volumes and improved OS and PFS without additional deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Müther
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Raphael Koch
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Matthias Weckesser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Peter Sporns
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Wolfram Schwindt
- Institute of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Stegmayr C, Stoffels G, Filß C, Heinzel A, Lohmann P, Willuweit A, Ermert J, Coenen HH, Mottaghy FM, Galldiks N, Langen KJ. Current trends in the use of O-(2-[ 18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([ 18F]FET) in neurooncology. Nucl Med Biol 2020; 92:78-84. [PMID: 32113820 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The diagnostic potential of PET using the amino acid analogue O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) in brain tumor diagnostics has been proven in many studies during the last two decades and is still the subject of multiple studies every year. In addition to standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) using [18F]FET provides important diagnostic data concerning brain tumor delineation, therapy planning, treatment monitoring, and improved differentiation between treatment-related changes and tumor recurrence. The pharmacokinetics, uptake mechanisms and metabolism have been well described in various preclinical studies. The accumulation of [18F]FET in most benign lesions and healthy brain tissue has been shown to be low, thus providing a high contrast between tumor tissue and benign tissue alterations. Based on logistic advantages of F-18 labelling and convincing clinical results, [18F]FET has widely replaced short lived amino acid tracers such as L-[11C]methyl-methionine ([11C]MET) in many centers across Western Europe. This review summarizes the basic knowledge on [18F]FET and its contribution to the care of patients with brain tumors. In particular, recent studies about specificity, possible pitfalls, and the utility of [18F]FET PET in tumor grading and prognostication regarding the revised WHO classification of brain tumors are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Stegmayr
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gabriele Stoffels
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Christian Filß
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Alexander Heinzel
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany; Juelich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA) - Section JARA-Brain, Germany
| | - Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Antje Willuweit
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Johannes Ermert
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Heinz H Coenen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany; Juelich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA) - Section JARA-Brain, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, Germany; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4, INM-5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany; Dept. of Nuclear Medicine, RWTH University Hospital, Aachen, Germany; Juelich-Aachen Research Alliance (JARA) - Section JARA-Brain, Germany; Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), University of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Duesseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fleischmann DF, Unterrainer M, Schön R, Corradini S, Maihöfer C, Bartenstein P, Belka C, Albert NL, Niyazi M. Margin reduction in radiotherapy for glioblastoma through 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine PET? - A recurrence pattern analysis. Radiother Oncol 2020; 145:49-55. [PMID: 31923709 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (18F-FET) PET is increasingly used in radiation treatment planning for the primary treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) patients additionally to contrast-enhanced MRI. To answer the question, whether a margin reduction in the primary treatment setting could be achieved through 18F-FET PET imaging, a recurrence pattern analysis was performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS GBM patients undergoing 18F-FET PET examination before primary radiochemotherapy from 05/2009 to 11/2014 were included into the recurrence pattern analysis. Biological tumour volumes were semi-automatically created and fused with MR-based gross tumour volumes (MRGTVs). The pattern of recurrence was examined for MRGTVs and for PET-MRGTVs. The minimal margin including all recurrent tumour sites was assessed by gradual expansion of the PET-MRGTVs and MRGTVs until inclusion of all contrast-enhancing areas at recurrence. RESULTS 36 GBM patients were included to the analysis. The minimal margin including all contrast enhancing tumour at recurrence was significantly smaller for the PET-MRGTVs compared to the MRGTVs (median 12.5 mm vs. 16.5 mm; p < 0.001, Wilcoxon-Test). PET-MRGTVs with 15 mm CTV margins were significantly smaller than MRGTVs with 20 mm CTV margins (median volume 255.92 vs. 258.35 cm3; p = 0.020, Wilcoxon-Test; excluding 3 cases with large non-contrast enhancing tumours). The pattern of recurrence of PET-MRGTVs with 15 mm CTV margins was comparable to MRGTVs with 20 mm CTV margins (32 vs. 30 central, 2 vs. 4 in-field, 2 vs. 2 ex-field and no marginal recurrences). CONCLUSION Target volume delineation of GBM patients can be improved through 18F-FET PET imaging prior to primary radiation treatment, since vital tumour can be detected more accurately. Furthermore, the results suggest that CTV margins could be reduced through 18F-FET PET imaging prior to primary RT of GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Rudolph Schön
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Cornelius Maihöfer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany.
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fennell JT, Gkika E, Grosu AL. Molecular Imaging in Photon Radiotherapy. Recent Results Cancer Res 2020; 216:845-863. [PMID: 32594409 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-42618-7_27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Nowadays, more than ever before, the treatment of cancer patients requires an interdisciplinary approach more than ever. Radiation therapy (RT) has become an indispensable pillar of cancer treatment early on, offering a local, curative treatment option and symptom control in palliative cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Combs SE, Kessel KA, Hesse J, Straube C, Zimmer C, Schmidt-Graf F, Schlegel J, Gempt J, Meyer B. Moving Second Courses of Radiotherapy Forward: Early Re-Irradiation After Surgical Resection for Recurrent Gliomas Improves Efficacy With Excellent Tolerability. Neurosurgery 2019; 83:1241-1248. [PMID: 29462372 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generally, re-irradiation (Re-RT) is offered to patients with glioma recurrences with macroscopic lesions. Results are discussed controversially, and some centers postulate limited benefit of Re-RT. Re-RT is generally offered to tumors up to 4 cm in diameter. Re-resection is also discussed controversially; however, recent studies have shown significant benefit. OBJECTIVE To combine proactive re-resection and early Re-RT in patients with recurrent glioma. METHODS We included 108 patients treated between 2002 and 2016 for recurrent glioma. All patients underwent surgical resection for recurrence; Re-RT was applied with a median dose of 37.5 Gy (range 25 Gy-57Gy/equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions [EQD2]) with high-precision techniques. All patients were followed prospectively in an interdisciplinary follow-up program. RESULTS Median follow-up after Re-RT was 7 mo. Median survival after surgery and Re-RT was 12 mo (range 1-102 mo). Complete resection had a significant impact on the outcome (P = .03). The strongest predictors of outcome were MGMT-promotor methylation and Karnofsky Performance Score and time interval between primary and second RT. CONCLUSION Proactive resection of tumor recurrences combined with early Re-RT conveys into promising outcome in recurrent glioma. Complete resection and early Re-RT lead to improved survival. Thus, moving Re-RT to an earlier timepoint during the treatment of recurrent glioma, eg after complete macroscopic removal of the tumor, may be crucial for treatment optimization. Using advanced RT techniques, side effects are low. Currently, this concept is evaluated in the GLIOCAVE/NOA 17 trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy ( i RT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (dktk), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy ( i RT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Josefine Hesse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Straube
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Schlegel
- Department of Neuropathology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
For newly diagnosed patients, the standard has remained largely unchanged for the past decade and concept-driven approaches like anti-angiogenic therapies or use of molecularly targeted drugs in all-comers populations have failed. Tumor-treating fields appear as a new option. Most current immunotherapy or molecularly targeted, precision medicine trials are also focusing on this newly diagnosed patient population. At progression, no standard exists and most treatments offer little beyond supportive care. Past trials lacked target precision and all-comers approaches have produced false negative results. Molecular precision approaches at progression need workup of recent rather than archival tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Wick
- Neurology Clinic, University of Heidelberg, INF 400, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit (CCU) Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Michael Platten
- Department of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zamboglou C, Fassbender TF, Steffan L, Schiller F, Fechter T, Carles M, Kiefer S, Rischke HC, Reichel K, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Ilhan H, Chirindel AF, Nicolas G, Henkenberens C, Derlin T, Bronsert P, Mavroidis P, Chen RC, Meyer PT, Ruf J, Grosu AL. Validation of different PSMA-PET/CT-based contouring techniques for intraprostatic tumor definition using histopathology as standard of reference. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:208-213. [PMID: 31431386 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate definition of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) is crucial for diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa). The optimal methodology for contouring of GTV using Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) information has not yet been defined. METHODS AND MATERIALS PCa patients who underwent a [68Ga]PSMA-11-PET/CT followed by radical prostatectomy were prospectively enrolled (n = 20). Six observer teams with different levels of experience and using different PET image scaling techniques performed manual contouring of GTV. Additionally, semi-automatic segmentation of GTVs was performed using SUVmax thresholds of 20-50%. Coregistered histopathological gross tumor volume (GTV-Histo) served as reference. Inter-observer agreement was assessed by calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS Most contouring methods provided high sensitivity and specificity. For manual delineation, scaling the PET images from SUVmin-max: 0-5 resulted in high sensitivity (>86%). The highest specificity (100%) was obtained by scaling the PET images from SUVmin-max: 0-SUVmax. High interobserver agreement (median DSC 0.8) was observed when using the same PET image scaling technique (PET images SUVmin-max: 0-5). For semi-automatic segmentation, a low SUVmax threshold of 20% optimized sensitivity (SUVmax threshold 20%, 100% sensitivity, 32% of prostatic volume), whereas a higher threshold optimized specificity (SUVmax threshold 40%-50%, 100% specificity). CONCLUSIONS Contouring of regions with high tracer-uptake resulted in very high specificities and should be used for biopsy guidance. Both manual and semi-automatic approaches using validated SUV scaling (SUVmin-max: 0-5) or thresholding (20%) may provide high sensitivity, and should be considered for PSMA-PET-based focal therapy approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany; Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas F Fassbender
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Lina Steffan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schiller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Fechter
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Montserrat Carles
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Selina Kiefer
- Department of Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hans C Rischke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Reichel
- Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | - Alin F Chirindel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Guillaume Nicolas
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Peter Bronsert
- Department of Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University North Carolina - Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Juri Ruf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine. University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Alongi P, Laudicella R, Desideri I, Chiaravalloti A, Borghetti P, Quartuccio N, Fiore M, Evangelista L, Marino L, Caobelli F, Tuscano C, Mapelli P, Lancellotta V, Annunziata S, Ricci M, Ciurlia E, Fiorentino A. Positron emission tomography with computed tomography imaging (PET/CT) for the radiotherapy planning definition of the biological target volume: PART 1. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 140:74-79. [PMID: 30795884 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Functional and molecular imaging, including positron emission tomography with computed tomography imaging (PET/CT) is increasing for radiotherapy (RT) definition of the target volume. This expert review summarizes existing data of functional imaging modalities and RT management, in terms of target volume delineation, for the following anatomical districts: brain (for primary and secondary tumors), head/neck and lung. MATERIALS AND METHODS A collection of available published data was made, by PubMed a search. Only original articles were carefully and critically revised. RESULTS For primary and secondary brain tumors, amino acid PET radiotracers could be useful to identify microscopic residual areas and to differ between recurrence and treatment-related alterations in case of re-irradiation. As for head and neck neoplasms may benefit from precise PET/CT-based target delineation, due to the major capability to identify high-risk RT areas. In primary and secondary lung cancer, PET/CT could be useful both to delimit a tumor and collapsed lungs and as a predictive parameter of treatment response. CONCLUSION Taken together, molecular and functional imaging approaches offer a major step to individualize radiotherapeutic care going forward. Nevertheless, several uncertainties remain on the standard method to properly assess the target volume definition including PET information for primary and secondary brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Alongi
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Nuclear Medicine Service, Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio, Cefalu. Italy
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina. Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental and Clinical Sciences "Mario Serio", Section of Radiation Oncology, University of Florence, Italy
| | - Agostino Chiaravalloti
- IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo (INM) Neuromed, Pozzilli, Italy; Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Radiation Oncology Department University and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Michele Fiore
- Radiation Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Lorenza Marino
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, REM, Viagrande, Catania, Italy
| | - Federico Caobelli
- Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carmelo Tuscano
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Annunziata
- Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS-Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Ricci
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Ciurlia
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, General Regional Hospital "F. Miulli", Strada Prov. 127 Km 4, 70021, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Molecular and Clinical Insights into the Invasive Capacity of Glioblastoma Cells. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:1740763. [PMID: 31467533 PMCID: PMC6699388 DOI: 10.1155/2019/1740763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The invasive capacity of GBM is one of the key tumoral features associated with treatment resistance, recurrence, and poor overall survival. The molecular machinery underlying GBM invasiveness comprises an intricate network of signaling pathways and interactions with the extracellular matrix and host cells. Among them, PI3k/Akt, Wnt, Hedgehog, and NFkB play a crucial role in the cellular processes related to invasion. A better understanding of these pathways could potentially help in developing new therapeutic approaches with better outcomes. Nevertheless, despite significant advances made over the last decade on these molecular and cellular mechanisms, they have not been translated into the clinical practice. Moreover, targeting the infiltrative tumor and its significance regarding outcome is still a major clinical challenge. For instance, the pre- and intraoperative methods used to identify the infiltrative tumor are limited when trying to accurately define the tumor boundaries and the burden of tumor cells in the infiltrated parenchyma. Besides, the impact of treating the infiltrative tumor remains unclear. Here we aim to highlight the molecular and clinical hallmarks of invasion in GBM.
Collapse
|
42
|
Report of first recurrent glioma patients examined with PET-MRI prior to re-irradiation. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0216111. [PMID: 31339892 PMCID: PMC6655559 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The advantage of combined PET-MRI over sequential PET and MRI is the high spatial conformity and the absence of time delay between the examinations. The benefit of this technique for planning of re-irradiation (re-RT) treatment is unkown yet. Imaging data from a phase 1 trial of re-RT for recurrent glioma was analysed to assess whether planning target volumes and treatment margins in glioma re-RT can be adjusted by PET-MRI with rater independent PET based biological tumour volumes (BTVs). Patients and methods Combined PET-MRI with the tracer O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) prior to re-RT was performed in recurrent glioma patients in a phase I trial. GTVs including all regions suspicious of tumour on contrast enhanced MRI were delineated by three experienced radiation oncologists and included into MRI based consensus GTVs (MRGTVs). BTVs were semi-automatically delineated with a fixed threshold of 1.6 x background activity. Corresponding BTVs and MRGTVs were fused into union volume PET-MRGTVs. The Sørensen–Dice coefficient and the conformity index were used to assess the geometric overlap of the BTVs with the MRGTVs. A recurrence pattern analysis was performed based on the original planning target volumes (PTVs = GTV + 10 mm margin or 5 mm in one case) and the PET-MRGTVs with margins of 10, 8, 5 and 3 mm. Results Seven recurrent glioma patients, who received PET-MRI prior to re-RT, were included into the present planning study. At the time of re-RT, patients were in median 54 years old and had a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 80. Median post-recurrence survival after the beginning of re-RT was 13 months. Concomitant bevacizumab therapy was applied in six patients and one patient received chemoradiation with temozolomide. Median GTV volumes of the three radiation oncologists were 35.0, 37.5 and 40.5 cubic centimeters (cc) and median MRGTV volume 41.8 cc. Median BTV volume was 36.6 cc and median PET-MRGTV volume 59.3 cc. The median Sørensen–Dice coefficient for the comparison between MRGTV and BTV was 0.61 and the median conformity index 0.44. Recurrence pattern analysis revealed two central, two in-field and one distant recurrence within both, the original PTV, as well as the PET-MRGTV with a reduced margin of 3 mm. Conclusion PET-MRI provides radiation treatment planning imaging with high spatial and timely conformity for high-grade glioma patients treated with re-RT with potential advancements for target volume delineation. Prospective randomised trials are warranted to further investigate the treatment benefits of PET-MRI based re-RT planning.
Collapse
|
43
|
Straube C, Kessel KA, Zimmer C, Schmidt-Graf F, Schlegel J, Gempt J, Meyer B, Combs SE. A Second Course of Radiotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: Clinical Data on Re-irradiation, Prognostic Factors, and Usefulness of Digital Biomarkers. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2019; 20:71. [PMID: 31324990 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-019-0673-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The treatment of malignant gliomas has undergone a significant intensification during the past decade, and the interdisciplinary treatment team has learned that all treatment opportunities, including surgery and radiotherapy (RT), also have a central role in recurrent gliomas. Throughout the decades, re-irradiation (re-RT) has achieved a prominent place in the treatment of recurrent gliomas. A solid body of evidence supports the safety and efficacy of re-RT, especially when modern techniques are used, and justifies the early use of this regimen, especially in the case when macroscopic disease is present. Additionally, a second adjuvant re-RT to the resection cavity is currently being investigated by several investigators and seems to offer promising results. Although advanced RT technologies, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) have become available in many centers, re-RT should continue to be kept in experienced hands so that they can select the optimal regimen, the ideal treatment volume, and the appropriate techniques from their tool-boxes. Concomitant or adjuvant use of systemic treatment options should also strongly be taken into consideration, especially because temozolomide (TMZ), cyclohexyl-nitroso-urea (CCNU), and bevacizumab have shown a good safety profile; they should be considered, if available. Nonetheless, the selection of patients for re-RT remains crucial. Single factors, such as patient age or the progression-free interval (PFI), fall too short. Therefore, powerful prognostic scores have been generated and validated, and these scores should be used for patient selection and counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Straube
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Kerstin A Kessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Claus Zimmer
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Friederike Schmidt-Graf
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Schlegel
- Department of Neuroradiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Meyer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
- Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Delineating the gross tumor volume (GTV) is a core task within radiation treatment planning. GTVs must be precisely defined irrespective of the region involved, but even more so in a sensitive area such as the brain. As precision medicine cannot exist without precision imaging, the current article aims to discuss the various imaging modalities employed in the radiation treatment planning of brain tumors.Gliomas, meningiomas, and paragangliomas are some of the most challenging tumors and the advancement in diagnostic imaging can significantly contribute to their delineation. For gliomas, irradiation based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and amino-acid positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) may have a higher sensitivity and specificity, which could lead to a better sparing of organs at risk and help distinguish between tumor, edema, and radiogenic alterations. Meningiomas and paragangliomas are often associated with a good prognosis. Therefore, GTV delineation according to MRI and somatostatin receptor ligand-PET/CT plays an essential role in sparing sensitive structures and maintaining a good quality of life for these patients.The combination of multiparametric MRI and PET/CT (possibly in the form of PET/MRI) presently appears to be the optimal approach for target volume delineation. The comparative efficacy of these imaging modalities has to be further evaluated in prospective trials.
Collapse
|
45
|
Clinical Utility of Different Approaches for Detection of Late Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma With O-(2-[18F]Fluoroethyl)-l-Tyrosine PET. Clin Nucl Med 2019; 44:695-701. [DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000002652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
46
|
Laprie A, Ken S, Filleron T, Lubrano V, Vieillevigne L, Tensaouti F, Catalaa I, Boetto S, Khalifa J, Attal J, Peyraga G, Gomez-Roca C, Uro-Coste E, Noel G, Truc G, Sunyach MP, Magné N, Charissoux M, Supiot S, Bernier V, Mounier M, Poublanc M, Fabre A, Delord JP, Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E. Dose-painting multicenter phase III trial in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: the SPECTRO-GLIO trial comparing arm A standard radiochemotherapy to arm B radiochemotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost guided by MR spectroscopic imaging. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:167. [PMID: 30791889 PMCID: PMC6385401 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5317-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma, a high-grade glial infiltrating tumor, is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in adults and carries a dismal prognosis. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) increases overall survival but this is still low due to local relapses, mostly occurring in the irradiation field. As the ratio of spectra of choline/N acetyl aspartate> 2 (CNR2) on MR spectroscopic imaging has been described as predictive for the site of local relapse, we hypothesized that dose escalation on these regions would increase local control and hence global survival. Methods/design In this multicenter prospective phase III trial for newly diagnosed glioblastoma, 220 patients having undergone biopsy or surgery are planned for randomization to two arms. Arm A is the Stupp protocol (EBRT 60 Gy on contrast enhancement + 2 cm margin with concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) and 6 months of TMZ maintenance); Arm B is the same treatment with an additional simultaneous integrated boost of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of 72Gy/2.4Gy delivered on the MR spectroscopic imaging metabolic volumes of CHO/NAA > 2 and contrast-enhancing lesions or resection cavity. Stratification is performed on surgical and MGMT status. Discussion This is a dose-painting trial, i.e. delivery of heterogeneous dose guided by metabolic imaging. The principal endpoint is overall survival. An online prospective quality control of volumes and dose is performed in the experimental arm. The study will yield a large amount of longitudinal multimodal MR imaging data including planning CT, radiotherapy dosimetry, MR spectroscopic, diffusion and perfusion imaging. Trial registration NCT01507506, registration date December 20, 2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Laprie
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France. .,ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, UPS, Toulouse, France.
| | - Soléakhéna Ken
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, UPS, Toulouse, France.,Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-OncopoleCancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Thomas Filleron
- Biostatistics Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Vincent Lubrano
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, UPS, Toulouse, France.,Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Laure Vieillevigne
- Department of Engineering and Medical Physics, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-OncopoleCancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Fatima Tensaouti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.,ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Isabelle Catalaa
- ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, UPS, Toulouse, France.,Neuroimaging Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Sergio Boetto
- Neurosurgery Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Justine Attal
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Guillaume Peyraga
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Carlos Gomez-Roca
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Emmanuelle Uro-Coste
- Pathology department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Georges Noel
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France
| | - Gilles Truc
- Radiation Oncology Department Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Nicolas Magné
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire, Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - Marie Charissoux
- Radiation Oncology Department - Centre Val d'aurelle, Montpellier, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Nantes st Herblain, France
| | - Valérie Bernier
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis Vautrin, Nancy, France
| | - Muriel Mounier
- Clinical Research Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Muriel Poublanc
- Clinical Research Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Amandine Fabre
- Clinical Research Department, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Delord
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.,INSERM UMR1037, Cancer Research Center of Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Press RH, Zhong J, Gurbani SS, Weinberg BD, Eaton BR, Shim H, Shu HKG. The Role of Standard and Advanced Imaging for the Management of Brain Malignancies From a Radiation Oncology Standpoint. Neurosurgery 2018; 85:165-179. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) plays a critical role in the overall management of many central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Advances in RT treatment planning, with techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery, now allow the delivery of highly conformal dose with great precision. These techniques rely on high-resolution 3-dimensional anatomical imaging modalities such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to accurately and reliably define CNS targets and normal tissue avoidance structures. The integration of cross-sectional imaging into radiation oncology has directly translated into improvements in the therapeutic window of RT, and the union between radiation oncology and imaging is only expected to grow stronger. In addition, advanced imaging modalities including diffusion, perfusion, and spectroscopic MRIs as well as positron emission tomography (PET) scans with novel tracers are being utilized to provide additional insight into tumor biology and behavior beyond anatomy. Together, these standard and advanced imaging modalities hold significant potential to improve future RT delivery and response assessment. In this review, we will discuss the current utilization of standard/advanced imaging for CNS tumors from a radiation oncology perspective as well as the implications of novel MRI and PET modalities currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert H Press
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jim Zhong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Saumya S Gurbani
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Brent D Weinberg
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Bree R Eaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Hyunsuk Shim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Hui-Kuo G Shu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Peyraga G, Robaine N, Khalifa J, Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal E, Payoux P, Laprie A. Molecular PET imaging in adaptive radiotherapy: brain. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY 2018; 62:337-348. [PMID: 30497232 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.18.03116-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Owing to their heterogeneity and radioresistance, the prognosis of primitive brain tumors, which are mainly glial tumors, remains poor. Dose escalation in radioresistant areas is a potential issue for improving local control and overall survival. This review focuses on advances in biological and metabolic imaging of brain tumors that are proving to be essential for defining tumor target volumes in radiation therapy (RT) and for increasing the use of DPRT (dose painting RT) and ART (adaptative RT), to optimize dose in radio-resistant areas. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Various biological imaging modalities such as PET (hypoxia, glucidic metabolism, protidic metabolism, cellular proliferation, inflammation, cellular membrane synthesis) and MRI (spectroscopy) may be used to identify these areas of radioresistance. The integration of these biological imaging modalities improves the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of brain tumors. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Technological improvements (PET and MRI), the development of research, and intensive cooperation between different departments are necessary before using daily metabolic imaging (PET and MRI) to treat patients with brain tumors. CONCLUSIONS The adaptation of treatment volumes during RT (ART) seems promising, but its development requires improvements in several areas and an interdisciplinary approach involving radiology, nuclear medicine and radiotherapy. We review the literature on biological imaging to outline the perspectives for using DPRT and ART in brain tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Peyraga
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Claudius Regaud Institute, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Nesrine Robaine
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Claudius Regaud Institute, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Claudius Regaud Institute, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.,Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | - Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Claudius Regaud Institute, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France.,Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | - Pierre Payoux
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Purpan University Hospital Center, Toulouse, France
| | - Anne Laprie
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Claudius Regaud Institute, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France - .,Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lohmann P, Stavrinou P, Lipke K, Bauer EK, Ceccon G, Werner JM, Neumaier B, Fink GR, Shah NJ, Langen KJ, Galldiks N. FET PET reveals considerable spatial differences in tumour burden compared to conventional MRI in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 46:591-602. [PMID: 30327856 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4188-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Areas of contrast enhancement (CE) on MRI are usually the target for resection or radiotherapy target volume definition in glioblastomas. However, the solid tumour mass may extend beyond areas of CE. Amino acid PET can detect parts of the tumour that show no CE. We systematically investigated tumour volumes delineated by amino acid PET and MRI in patients with newly diagnosed, untreated glioblastoma. METHODS Preoperatively, 50 patients with neuropathologically confirmed glioblastoma underwent O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) PET, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced MRI. Areas of CE were manually segmented. FET PET tumour volumes were segmented using a tumour-to-brain ratio of ≥1.6. The percentage overlap volumes, and Dice and Jaccard spatial similarity coefficients (DSC, JSC) were calculated. FLAIR images were evaluated visually. RESULTS In 43 patients (86%), the FET tumour volume was significantly larger than the CE volume (21.5 ± 14.3 mL vs. 9.4 ± 11.3 mL; P < 0.001). Forty patients (80%) showed both increased uptake of FET and CE. In these 40 patients, the spatial similarity between FET uptake and CE was low (mean DSC 0.39 ± 0.21, mean JSC 0.26 ± 0.16). Ten patients (20%) showed no CE, and one of these patients showed no FET uptake. In five patients (10%), increased FET uptake was present outside areas of FLAIR hyperintensity. CONCLUSION Our results show that the metabolically active tumour volume delineated by FET PET is significantly larger than tumour volume delineated by CE. Furthermore, the results strongly suggest that the information derived from both imaging modalities should be integrated into the management of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Lohmann
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.
| | | | - Katharina Lipke
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Elena K Bauer
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Bernd Neumaier
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nadim J Shah
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, -4, -5), Forschungszentrum Juelich, 52425, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Neurology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Cologne and Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Diffusion-weighted MRI and ADC versus FET-PET and GdT1w-MRI for gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation in re-irradiation of recurrent glioblastoma. Radiother Oncol 2018; 130:121-131. [PMID: 30219612 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE GTV definition for re-irradiation treatment planning in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) is usually based on contrast-enhanced MRI (GdT1w-MRI) and, for an increased specificity, on amino acid PET. Diffusion-weighted (DWI) MRI and ADC maps can reveal regions of high cellularity as surrogate for active tumor. The objective of this study was to compare the localization and quality of diffusion restriction foci (GTV-ADClow) with FET-PET (GTV-PET) and GdT1w-MRI (GTV-GdT1w-MRI). MATERIAL AND METHODS We prospectively evaluated 41 patients, who received a fractionated stereotactic re-irradiation for rGBM. GTV-PET was generated automatically (tumor-to-background ratio 1.7-1.8) and manually customized. GTV-ADClow was manually defined based on DWI data (3D diffusion gradients, b = 0, 1000 s/mm2) and parametric ADC maps. The localization of recurrence was correlated with initial GdT1w-MRI and PET data. RESULTS In 30/41 patients, DWI-MRI showed areas with restricted diffusion (mean ADC-value 0.74 ± 0.22 mm2/s). 66% of GTVs-ADClow were located outside the GdT1w-MRI volume and 76% outside increased FET uptake regions. Furthermore, GTVs-ADClow were only partially included in the high dose volume and received in mean 82% of the reference dose. An adjusted volume including GdT1w-MRI, PET-positive and restricted diffusion areas would imply a GTV increase of 48%. GTV-PET and GdT1w-MRI correlated better with the localization of re-recurrence in comparison to GTV-ADClow. CONCLUSION Unexpectedly, GTV-ADClow overlapped only partially with FET-PET and GdT1w-MRI in rGBM. Moreover, GTV-ADClow correlated poorly with later rGBM-recurrences. Seeing as a restricted diffusion is known to correlate with hypercellularity, this imaging discrepancy could only be further explained in histopathological studies.
Collapse
|