1
|
Scalorbi F, Garanzini EM, Calareso G, Marzi C, Di Rocco G, Argiroffi G, Baccini M, Pusceddu S, Marchianò A, Maccauro M. Cylindrical TGR as early radiological predictor of RLT progression in GEPNETs: a proof of concept. Sci Rep 2024; 14:15782. [PMID: 38982134 PMCID: PMC11233714 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66668-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aims to assess the predictive capability of cylindrical Tumor Growth Rate (cTGR) in the prediction of early progression of well-differentiated gastro-entero-pancreatic tumours after Radio Ligand Therapy (RLT), compared to the conventional TGR. Fifty-eight patients were included and three CT scans per patient were collected at baseline, during RLT, and follow-up. RLT response, evaluated at follow-up according to RECIST 1.1, was calculated as a percentage variation of lesion diameters over time (continuous values) and as four different RECIST classes. TGR between baseline and interim CT was computed using both conventional (approximating lesion volume to a sphere) and cylindrical (called cTGR, approximating lesion volume to an elliptical cylinder) formulations. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were employed for Progressive Disease class prediction, revealing that cTGR outperformed conventional TGR (area under the ROC equal to 1.00 and 0.92, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the superiority of cTGR in predicting continuous RLT response, with a higher coefficient for cTGR (1.56) compared to the conventional one (1.45). This study serves as a proof of concept, paving the way for future clinical trials to incorporate cTGR as a valuable tool for assessing RLT response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Scalorbi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Matteo Garanzini
- Department of Radiodiagnostics and Radiotherapy, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Calareso
- Department of Radiodiagnostics and Radiotherapy, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Marzi
- Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti", University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 59, 50134, Florence, Italy.
| | - Gabriella Di Rocco
- Department of Radiodiagnostics and Radiotherapy, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Post-Graduation School of Radiology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Argiroffi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Baccini
- Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications "G. Parenti", University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 59, 50134, Florence, Italy
| | - Sara Pusceddu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfonso Marchianò
- Department of Radiodiagnostics and Radiotherapy, IRCCS Fondazione Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Maccauro
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Padmanabhan Nair Sobha R, Jensen CT, Waters R, Calimano-Ramirez LF, Virarkar MK. Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Comprehensive Review. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024; 48:545-562. [PMID: 37574653 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) is the most common adult appendiceal malignant tumor, constituting 16% of gastrointestinal NENs. They are versatile tumors with varying morphology, immunohistochemistry, secretory properties, and cancer genomics. They are slow growing and clinically silent, to begin with, or present with features of nonspecific vague abdominal pain. Most acute presentations are attributed clinically to appendicitis, with most cases detected incidentally on pathology after an appendectomy. Approximately 40% of them present clinically with features of hormonal excess, which is likened to the functional secretory nature of their parent cell of origin. The symptoms of carcinoid syndrome render their presence clinically evident. However, slow growing and symptomatically silent in its initial stages, high-grade neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the appendix are aggressive and usually have hepatic and lymph node metastasis at presentation. This review article focuses on imaging characteristics, World Health Organization histopathological classification and grading, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union or International Cancer Control, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society staging, European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society standardized guidelines for reporting, data interpretation, early-stage management protocols, and advanced-stage appendiceal NENs. Guidelines are also set for the follow-up and reassessment. The role of targeted radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and high-dose somatostatin analogs in treating advanced disease are discussed, along with types of ablative therapies and liver transplantation for tumor recurrence. The search for newer location-specific biomarkers in NEN is also summarized. Regarding the varying aggressiveness of the tumor, there is a scope for research in the field, with plenty of data yet to be discovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Corey T Jensen
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Rebecca Waters
- Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Mayur K Virarkar
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neuroendocrine Tumor Therapy Response Assessment. PET Clin 2023; 18:267-286. [PMID: 36858748 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has become an integral part of management of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Gallium-68- and lutetium-177-labeled somatostatin receptor analogues have replaced yttrium-90- and 111-indium-based tracers. Several newer targeted therapies are also being used in clinical and research settings. It is imperative to accurately evaluate the response to these agents. The characteristics of NENs and the response patterns of the targeted therapies make response assessment in this group challenging. This article provides an overview of the strengths and weaknesses of the various biomarkers available for response assessment.
Collapse
|
4
|
Staal FC, Taghavi M, Hong EK, Tissier R, van Treijen M, Heeres BC, van der Zee D, Tesselaar ME, Beets-Tan RG, Maas M. CT-based radiomics to distinguish progressive from stable neuroendocrine liver metastases treated with somatostatin analogues: an explorative study. Acta Radiol 2023; 64:1062-1070. [PMID: 35702011 DOI: 10.1177/02841851221106598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate response evaluation in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) remains a challenge. Radiomics has shown promising results regarding response assessment. PURPOSE To differentiate progressive (PD) from stable disease (SD) with radiomics in patients with NELM undergoing somatostatin analogue (SSA) treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 46 patients with histologically confirmed gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) with ≥1 NELM and ≥2 computed tomography (CT) scans were included. Response was assessed with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1). Hepatic target lesions were manually delineated and analyzed with radiomics. Radiomics features were extracted from each NELM on both arterial-phase (AP) and portal-venous-phase (PVP) CT. Multiple instance learning with regularized logistic regression via LASSO penalization (with threefold cross-validation) was used to classify response. Three models were computed: (i) AP model; (ii) PVP model; and (iii) AP + PVP model for a lesion-based and patient-based outcome. Next, clinical features were added to each model. RESULTS In total, 19 (40%) patients had PD. Median follow-up was 13 months (range 1-50 months). Radiomics models could not accurately classify response (area under the curve 0.44-0.60). Adding clinical variables to the radiomics models did not significantly improve the performance of any model. CONCLUSION Radiomics features were not able to accurately classify response of NELM on surveillance CT scans during SSA treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke Cr Staal
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, 5211Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETS Center of Excellence, 1228Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Taghavi
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, 5211Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Eun K Hong
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, 5211Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, 26725Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Renaud Tissier
- Biostatistics Center, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark van Treijen
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETS Center of Excellence, 1228Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, 8124University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Birthe C Heeres
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Margot Et Tesselaar
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETS Center of Excellence, 1228Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam/University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Regina Gh Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, 5211Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, 1228The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
PET Criteria by Cancer Type from Imaging Interpretation to Treatment Response Assessment: Beyond FDG PET Score. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13030611. [PMID: 36983767 PMCID: PMC10057339 DOI: 10.3390/life13030611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: in recent years, the role of positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged as a reliable diagnostic tool in a wide variety of pathological conditions. This review aims to collect and review PET criteria developed for interpretation and treatment response assessment in cases of non-[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) imaging in oncology. Methods: A wide literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar databases was made to find relevant published articles about non-[18F]FDG PET response criteria. Results: The comprehensive computer literature search revealed 183 articles. On reviewing the titles and abstracts, 149 articles were excluded because the reported data were not within the field of interest. Finally, 34 articles were selected and retrieved in full-text versions. Conclusions: available criteria are a promising tool for the interpretation of non-FDG PET scans, but also to assess the response to therapy and therefore to predict the prognosis. However, oriented clinical trials are needed to clearly evaluate their impact on patient management.
Collapse
|
6
|
Reddy RP, Ross Schmidtlein C, Giancipoli RG, Mauguen A, LaFontaine D, Schoder H, Bodei L. The Quest for an Accurate Functional Tumor Volume with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1027-1032. [PMID: 34772795 PMCID: PMC9258575 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
68Ga-labeled somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT is now a standard-of-care component in the management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, treatment response for NETs is still assessed with morphologic size measurements from other modalities, which can result in inaccuracy about the disease burden. Functional tumor volume (FTV) acquired from SSA PET/CT has been suggested as a possible metric, but no validated measurement tool to measure FTV exists. We tested the precision of multiple FTV computational approaches compared with morphologic volume measurements to identify a candidate for incorporation into future FTV studies to assess tumor burden more completely and accurately. Methods: The clinical and imaging data of 327 NET patients were collected at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between December 2016 and April 2018. Patients were required to have SSA PET/CT and dedicated CT scans within 6 wk and were excluded if they had any intervention between scans. When paired studies were evaluated, 150 correlating lesions demonstrated SSA. Lesions were excluded if they contained necrotic components or were lobulated. This exclusion resulted in 94 lesions in 20 patients. The FTV for each lesion was evaluated with a hand-drawn assessment and 3 automated techniques: 50% threshold from SUVmax, 42% threshold from SUVmax, and background-subtracted lesion activity. These measurements were compared with volume calculated from morphologic volume measurements. Results: The FTV calculation methods showed varying correlations with morphologic volume measurements. FTV using a 42% threshold had a 0.706 correlation, hand-drawn volume from PET imaging had a 0.657 correlation, FTV using a 50% threshold had a 0.645 correlation, and background-subtracted lesion activity had a 0.596 correlation. The Bland-Altman plots indicated that all FTV methods had a positive mean difference from morphologic volume, with a 50% threshold showing the smallest mean difference. Conclusion: FTV determined with thresholding of SUVmax demonstrated the strongest correlation with traditional morphologic lesion volume assessment and the least bias. This method was more accurate than FTV calculated from hand-drawn volume assessments. Threshold-based automated FTV assessment promises to better determine disease extent and prognosis in patients with NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan P. Reddy
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New, York, New York
| | - C. Ross Schmidtlein
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New, York, New York
| | - Romina G. Giancipoli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; and
| | - Audrey Mauguen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel LaFontaine
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New, York, New York
| | - Heiko Schoder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New, York, New York
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New, York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zwirtz K, Hardt J, Acker G, Baur ADJ, Pavel M, Huang K, Brenner W, Prasad V. Comparison of Choi, RECIST and Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT Based Criteria for the Evaluation of Response and Response Prediction to PRRT. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:1278. [PMID: 35745849 PMCID: PMC9227135 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14061278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: The most suitable method for assessment of response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) is still under debate. In this study we aimed to compare size (RECIST 1.1), density (Choi), Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) and a newly defined ZP combined parameter derived from Somatostatin Receptor (SSR) PET/CT for prediction of both response to PRRT and overall survival (OS). Material and Methods: Thirty-four NET patients with progressive disease (F:M 23:11; mean age 61.2 y; SD ± 12) treated with PRRT using either Lu-177 DOTATOC or Lu-177 DOTATATE and imaged with Ga-68 SSR PET/CT approximately 10-12 weeks prior to and after each treatment cycle were retrospectively analyzed. Median duration of follow-up after the first cycle was 63.9 months (range 6.2-86.2). A total of 77 lesions (2-8 per patient) were analyzed. Response assessment was performed according to RECIST 1.1, Choi and modified EORTC (MORE) criteria. In addition, a new parameter named ZP, the product of Hounsfield unit (HU) and SUVmean (Standard Uptake Value) of a tumor lesion, was tested. Further, SUV values (max and mean) of the tumor were normalized to SUV of normal liver parenchyma. Tumor response was defined as CR, PR, or SD. Gold standard for comparison of baseline parameters for prediction of response of individual target lesions to PRRT was change in size of lesions according to RECIST 1.1. For prediction of overall survival, the response after the first and second PRRT were tested. Results: Based on RECIST 1.1, Choi, MORE, and ZP, 85.3%, 64.7%, 61.8%, and 70.6% achieved a response whereas 14.7%, 35.3%, 38.2%, and 29.4% demonstrated PD (progressive disease), respectively. Baseline ZP and ZPnormalized were found to be the only parameters predictive of lesion progression after three PRRT cycles (AUC ZP 0.753; 95% CI 0.6-0.9, p 0.037; AUC ZPnormalized 0.766; 95% CI 0.6-0.9; p 0.029). Based on a cut-off-value of 1201, ZP achieved a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 67%, while ZPnormalized reached a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 76% at a cut-off-value of 198. Median OS in the total cohort was not reached. In univariate analysis amongst all parameters, only patients having progressive disease according to MORE after the second cycle of PRRT were found to have significantly shorter overall survival (median OS in objective responders not reached, in PD 29.2 months; p 0.015). Patients progressive after two cycles of PRRT according to ZP had shorter OS compared to those responding (median OS for responders not reached, for PD 47.2 months, p 0.066). Conclusions: In this explorative study, we showed that Choi, RECIST 1.1, and SUVmax-based response evaluation varied significantly from each other. Only patients showing progressive disease after two PRRT cycles according to MORE criteria had a worse prognosis while baseline ZP and ZPnormalized performed best in predicting lesion progression after three cycles of PRRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Zwirtz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (K.Z.); (K.H.); (W.B.)
| | - Juliane Hardt
- Institute of Biometry and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
- Department of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training for Health in the Human-Animal-Environment Interface, University of Veterinary Medicine (Foundation) Hannover (TiHo), 30559 Hannover, Germany
- Medical Information Management, Faculty of Information and Communication, University of Applied Sciences Hannover, 30459 Hannover, Germany
| | - Güliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Alexander D. J. Baur
- Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Marianne Pavel
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany;
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (K.Z.); (K.H.); (W.B.)
| | - Winfried Brenner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (K.Z.); (K.H.); (W.B.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vikas Prasad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany; (K.Z.); (K.H.); (W.B.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany
- International Centers for Precision Oncology Academy, 65189 Wiesbaden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Treijen MJC, Schoevers JMH, Heeres BC, van der Zee D, Maas M, Valk GD, Tesselaar MET. Defining disease status in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Choi-criteria or RECIST? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:1071-1081. [PMID: 34989825 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03393-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adequate monitoring of changes in tumor load is fundamental for the assessment of the course of disease and response to treatment. There is an ongoing debate on the utility of RECIST v1.1 in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). METHODS In this retrospective real-life cohort study, Choi-criteria were compared with RECIST v1.1. The agreement between both criteria and the association with survival endpoints were evaluated. RESULTS Seventy-five patients were included with a median follow-up of 35 months (range 8-53). Median progression-free survival (mPFS) according to RECIST v1.1 was 15 months (range 2-50) compared to 14 months (range 2-50) in Choi. According to RECIST, 33 (44%) patients were classified as having stable disease (SD), 40 (53%) as progressive disease (PD) and two (3%) patients as partial response (PR), compared to 9 (12%) patients classified as SD, 50 (67%) as PD and 16 (21%) as PR according to Choi-criteria. Overall concordance between the criteria was moderate (Cohen's Kappa = 0.408, p < 0.001) and agreement varied between 57 and 69% at each consecutive scan (p < 0.001). Survival analysis showed significant differences in overall survival (OS) for RECIST v1.1 categories PD and non-PD (log-rank p = 0.02), however, in Choi no significant differences in OS were found (p = 0.27). CONCLUSION RECIST v1.1 had a better clinical utility and prognostic value compared to Choi-criteria. Still, RECIST were also not sufficient to adequately predict OS. This outlines the need for new tools that provides accurate information on the disease course and treatment response to support precise prognostication in patients with GEP-NETs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J C van Treijen
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute/University Medical Center Utrecht Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETs Center of Excellence, Amsterdam/Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - J M H Schoevers
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - B C Heeres
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute/University Medical Center Utrecht Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETs Center of Excellence, Amsterdam/Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D van der Zee
- Department of Radiology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - M Maas
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute/University Medical Center Utrecht Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETs Center of Excellence, Amsterdam/Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G D Valk
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute/University Medical Center Utrecht Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETs Center of Excellence, Amsterdam/Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M E T Tesselaar
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute/University Medical Center Utrecht Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, ENETs Center of Excellence, Amsterdam/Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dromain C, Vullierme M, Hicks RJ, Prasad V, O’Toole D, de Herder WW, Pavel M, Faggiano A, Kos‐Kudla B, Öberg K, Krejs GJ, Grande E, Niederle B, Sundin A. ENETS standardized (synoptic) reporting for radiological imaging in neuroendocrine tumours. J Neuroendocrinol 2022; 34:e13044. [PMID: 34693574 PMCID: PMC9286653 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
This expert consensus document represents an initiative by the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) to provide guidance for synoptic reporting of radiological examinations critical to the diagnosis, grading, staging and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Template drafts for initial tumor staging and follow-up by computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were established, based on existing institutional and organisational reporting templates relevant for NEN imaging, and applying the RadLex lexicon of radiological information (Radiological Society of North America), for consistency regarding the radiological terms. During the ENETS Scientific Advisory Board meeting 2018, the template drafts were subject to iterative interdisciplinary discussions among experts in imaging, surgery, gastroenterology, oncology and pathology. Members of the imaging group stated a strong preference for a combination of limited and standardised options by way of drop-down menus. Separate templates were produced for the initial work-up and for follow-up, respectively. To provide a detailed description of the radiological findings of the primary tumor and its local extension and spread, different templates were developed for bronchial, pancreatic and gastrointestinal NENs for CT and MRI, respectively. Each template was structured in 10 sections: clinical details, comparative imaging modality, acquisition technique, primary tumor findings, regional lymph node metastases, distant metastases, TNM classification, reference lesions according to RECIST 1.1, additional findings and conclusion. Two templates were developed for follow-up, for CT and MRI, respectively, and were specifically focused on assessment of therapy response. These included a qualitative response assessment, such as decrease of vascularisation and presence of necrosis, and a quantitative assessment according to RECIST 1.1 and the modified RECIST (mRECIST) for assessing tumor response following transarterial chemoembolisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarisse Dromain
- Department of RadiologyLausanne University Hospital and University of LausanneLausanneSwitzerland
| | - Marie‐Pierre Vullierme
- Department of RadiologyHôpital Beaujon – Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de SeineUniversité de ParisParisFrance
| | - Rodney J. Hicks
- Neuroendocrine ServiceThe Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of OncologyUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Vikas Prasad
- Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity UlmUlmGermany
| | - Dermot O’Toole
- St. James's and St. Vincent's University Hospitals & Trinity College DublinDublinRepublic of Ireland
| | - Wouter W. de Herder
- Department of Internal MedicineSection of EndocrinologyErasmus MCRotterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Marianne Pavel
- Department of Medicine 1Universitätsklinikum ErlangenErlangenGermany
| | - Antongiulio Faggiano
- Department of Clinical and Molecular MedicineSapienza University of Rome, Sant'Andrea HospitalRomeItaly
| | - Beata Kos‐Kudla
- Department of Endocrinology and Neuroendocrine TumorsMedical University of SilesiaKatowicePoland
| | - Kjell Öberg
- Department of Endocrine OncologyUniversity Hospital UppsalaUppsalaSweden
| | - Guenter J. Krejs
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal MedicineMedical University of GrazGrazAustria
| | - Enrique Grande
- Department of Medical OncologyMD Anderson Cancer Center MadridMadridSpain
| | - Bruno Niederle
- Department of General SurgeryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Anders Sundin
- Department of Surgical SciencesRadiology & Molecular Imaging, Uppsala University HospitalUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee L, Ramos-Alvarez I, Jensen RT. Predictive Factors for Resistant Disease with Medical/Radiologic/Liver-Directed Anti-Tumor Treatments in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Advances and Controversies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051250. [PMID: 35267558 PMCID: PMC8909561 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tumor resistance, both primary and acquired, is leading to increased complexity in the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs, which would be greatly helped by reliable prognostic/predictive factors. The importance in identifying resistance is being contributed to by the increased array of possible treatments available for treating resistant advanced disease; the variable clinical course as well as response to any given treatment approach of patients within one staging or grading system, the advances in imaging which are providing increasing promising results/parameters that correlate with grading/outcome/resistance, the increased understanding of the molecular pathogenesis providing promising prognostic markers, all of which can contribute to selecting the best treatment to overcome resistance disease. Several factors have been identified that have prognostic/predictive value for identifying development resistant disease and affecting overall survival (OS)/PFS with various nonsurgical treatments of patients with advanced panNENs. Prognostic factors identified for patients with advanced panNENs for both OS/PFSs include various clinically-related factors (clinical, laboratory/biological markers, imaging, treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological, classification, grading) and molecular factors. Particularly important prognostic factors for the different treatment modalities studies are the recent grading systems. Most prognostic factors for each treatment modality for OS/PFS are not specific for a given treatment option. These advances have generated several controversies and new unanswered questions, particularly those related to their possible role in predicting the possible sequence of different anti-tumor treatments in patients with different presentations. Each of these areas is reviewed in this paper. Abstract Purpose: Recent advances in the diagnosis, management and nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have led to an emerging need for sensitive and useful prognostic factors for predicting responses/survival. Areas covered: The predictive value of a number of reported prognostic factors including clinically-related factors (clinical/laboratory/imaging/treatment-related factors), pathological factors (histological/classification/grading), and molecular factors, on therapeutic outcomes of anti-tumor medical therapies with molecular targeting agents (everolimus/sunitinib/somatostatin analogues), chemotherapy, radiological therapy with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or liver-directed therapies (embolization/chemoembolization/radio-embolization (SIRTs)) are reviewed. Recent findings in each of these areas, as well as remaining controversies and uncertainties, are discussed in detail, particularly from the viewpoint of treatment sequencing. Conclusions: The recent increase in the number of available therapeutic agents for the nonsurgical treatment of patients with advanced panNENs have raised the importance of prognostic factors predictive for therapeutic outcomes of each treatment option. The establishment of sensitive and useful prognostic markers will have a significant impact on optimal treatment selection, as well as in tailoring the therapeutic sequence, and for maximizing the survival benefit of each individual patient. In the paper, the progress in this area, as well as the controversies/uncertainties, are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingaku Lee
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
- National Kyushu Cancer Center, Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatology, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan
| | - Irene Ramos-Alvarez
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
| | - Robert T. Jensen
- Digestive Diseases Branch, NIDDK, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1804, USA; (L.L.); (I.R.-A.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-301-496-4201
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cheng S, Jin Z, Xue H. Assessment of Response to Chemotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer with Liver Metastasis: CT Texture as a Predictive Biomarker. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122252. [PMID: 34943489 PMCID: PMC8700536 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In this paper, we assess changes in CT texture of metastatic liver lesions after treatment with chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer and determine if texture parameters correlate with measured time to progression (TTP). This retrospective study included 110 patients with pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis, and mean, entropy, kurtosis, skewness, mean of positive pixels, and standard deviation (SD) values were extracted during texture analysis. Response assessment was also obtained by using RECIST 1.1, Choi and modified Choi criteria, respectively. The correlation of texture parameters and existing assessment criteria with TTP were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses in the training cohort. Kaplan-Meier curves of the proportion of patients without disease progression were significantly different for several texture parameters, and were better than those for RECIST 1.1-, Choi-, and modified Choi-defined response (p < 0.05 vs. p = 0.398, p = 0.142, and p = 0.536, respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that percentage change in SD was an independent predictor of TTP (p = 0.016) and confirmed in the validation cohort (p = 0.019). In conclusion, CT texture parameters have the potential to become predictive imaging biomarkers for response evaluation in pancreatic cancer with liver metastasis.
Collapse
|
12
|
Girot C, Volk A, Walczak C, Lassau N, Pitre-Champagnat S. New method for quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity: a feasibility study on K trans maps from preclinical DCE-MRI. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2021; 34:845-857. [PMID: 34091826 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-021-00930-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
OBJECT To develop new imaging biomarkers of therapeutic efficacy through the quantification of intratumoral microvascular heterogeneity. MATERIALS AND METHODS The described method was a combination of non-supervised clustering and extraction of intratumoral complexity features (ICF): number of non-connected objects, volume fraction. It was applied to a set of 3D DCE-MRI Ktrans maps acquired previously on tumor bearing mice prior to and on day 4 of anti-angiogenic treatment. Evolutions of ICF were compared to conventional summary statistics (CSS) and to heterogeneity related whole tumor texture features (TF) on treated (n = 9) and control (n = 6) mice. RESULTS Computed optimal number of clusters per tumor was 4. Several intratumoral features extracted from the clusters were able to monitor a therapy effect. Whereas no feature significantly changed for the control group, 6 features significantly changed for the treated group (4 ICF, 2 CSS). Among these, 5 also significantly differentiated the two groups (3 ICF, 2 CSS). TF failed in demonstrating differences within and between the two groups. DISCUSSION ICF are potential imaging biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy assessment. The presented method may be expected to have advantages with respect to texture analysis-based methods regarding interpretability of results and setup of standardized image analysis protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charly Girot
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BioMaps, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Andreas Volk
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BioMaps, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Christine Walczak
- Institut Curie, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Nathalie Lassau
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BioMaps, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France.,Département de Radiologie, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Stéphanie Pitre-Champagnat
- Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BioMaps, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cognetti DM, Johnson JM, Curry JM, Kochuparambil ST, McDonald D, Mott F, Fidler MJ, Stenson K, Vasan NR, Razaq MA, Campana J, Ha P, Mann G, Ishida K, Garcia-Guzman M, Biel M, Gillenwater AM. Phase 1/2a, open-label, multicenter study of RM-1929 photoimmunotherapy in patients with locoregional, recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2021; 43:3875-3887. [PMID: 34626024 PMCID: PMC9293150 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (rHNSCC) represents a significant global health burden with an unmet medical need. In this study we determined the safety and efficacy of RM‐1929 photoimmunotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated rHNSCC. Methods RM‐1929 (anti‐EGFR–IR700 dye conjugate) was infused, followed by tumor illumination. We evaluated safety, tumor response, and pharmacokinetics. Results Nine patients were enrolled in Part 1 (dose‐finding) and 30 patients in Part 2 (safety and efficacy). No dose‐limiting toxicities were experienced in Part 1; 640 mg/m2 with fixed light dose (50 J/cm2 or 100 J/cm) was recommended for Part 2. Adverse events (AEs) in Part 2 were mostly mild to moderate but 19 (63.3%) patients had AE ≥Grade 3, including 3 (10.0%) with serious AEs leading to death (not treatment related). Efficacy in Part 2: unconfirmed objective response rate (ORR) 43.3% (95% CI 25.46%–62.57%); confirmed ORR 26.7% (95% CI 12.28%–45.89%); median overall survival 9.30 months (95% CI 5.16–16.92 months). Conclusions Treatment was well tolerated. Responses and survival following RM‐1929 photoimmunotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with rHNSCC were clinically meaningful and warrant further investigation. Clinical Trial Information NCT02422979.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Cognetti
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer M Johnson
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joseph M Curry
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Samith T Kochuparambil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Darren McDonald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Frank Mott
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary J Fidler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cell Therapy, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Kerstin Stenson
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Nilesh R Vasan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Mohammad A Razaq
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - John Campana
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado Head and Neck Specialists, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Patrick Ha
- Division of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Grace Mann
- Department of Clinical Development, Rakuten Medical, Inc, San Mateo, California, USA
| | - Kosuke Ishida
- Department of Biostatistics, Rakuten Medical Japan, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Miguel Garcia-Guzman
- Department of Translational Sciences, Rakuten Medical, Inc, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Merrill Biel
- Department of Clinical Development, Rakuten Medical, Inc, San Mateo, California, USA
| | - Ann M Gillenwater
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vullierme MP, Ruszniewski P, de Mestier L. Are recist criteria adequate in assessing the response to therapy in metastatic NEN? Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2021; 22:637-645. [PMID: 33871762 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-021-09645-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Response to therapy criteria, known as RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours), are widely used to evaluate neuroendocrine tumours (NET) metastatic to the liver, under treatment. RECIST criteria does not take in account many various distinct features such as tumour growth, secretory capacity and anatomical localisation with wide variation in clinical and biological presentation of different NETs. Key features of RECIST includes definitions of the minimal size of measurable lesions, instructions on how many lesions to measure and follow, and the use of unidimensional, rather than bidimensional, measures for overall evaluation of tumour burden. These measures are currently done with computed tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). RECIST criteria are accurate in assessing tumour progression but sometimes inaccurate in assessing tumour response after locoregional therapy or under molecular targeted therapy, tumour vessels being part of the target of such treatments. There is poor correlation between a so called tumour necrosis and conventional methods of response assessment, which poses questions of how best to quantify efficacy of these targeted therapies. Variations in tumour density with computed tomography (CT) could theoretically be associated with tumour necrosis. This hypothesis has been studied proposing alternative CT criteria of response evaluation in metastatic digestive NET treated with targeted therapy. If preliminary results upon the poor relationship between density measured with CT (derived from CHOI criteria) evolution curves at CT and PFS are confirmed by further studies, showing that the correlation between density changing and response to non-targeted treatment is weak, the use of contrast injection, will probably be not mandatory to enable appropriate evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Pierre Vullierme
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Paris-Nord Val-de-Seine, AP-HP, Beaujon, 92110, Clichy, France.
- Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7, University of Paris, 75018, Clichy, France.
| | - Philippe Ruszniewski
- Department of Pancreatology, University Hospitals Paris-Nord Val-de-Seine, AP-HP, Beaujon, 92110, Clichy, France
- Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7, University of Paris, 75018, Clichy, France
| | - Louis de Mestier
- Department of Pancreatology, University Hospitals Paris-Nord Val-de-Seine, AP-HP, Beaujon, 92110, Clichy, France
- Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7, University of Paris, 75018, Clichy, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roll W, Weckesser M, Seifert R, Bodei L, Rahbar K. Imaging and liquid biopsy in the prediction and evaluation of response to PRRT in neuroendocrine tumors: implications for patient management. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:4016-4027. [PMID: 33903926 PMCID: PMC8484222 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05359-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this narrative review is to give an overview on current and emerging imaging methods and liquid biopsy for prediction and evaluation of response to PRRT. Current limitations and new perspectives, including artificial intelligence, are discussed. Methods A literature review of PubMed/Medline was performed with representative keywords. The search included articles published online through August 31, 2020. All searches were restricted to English language manuscripts. Results Peptide radio receptor therapy (PRRT) is a prospectively evaluated and approved therapy option in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Different ligands targeting the somatostatin receptor (SSTR) are used as theranostic pairs for imaging NET and for PRRT. Response assessment in prospective trials often relies on the morphological RECIST 1.1 criteria, based on lesion size in CT or MRI. The role of SSTR-PET and quantitative uptake parameters and volumetric data is still not defined. Monoanalyte tumor marker chromogranin A has a limited value for response assessment after PRRT. New emerging liquid biopsy techniques are offering prediction of response to PRRT and prognostic value. Conclusions New response criteria for NET patients undergoing PRRT will comprise multiparametric hybrid imaging and blood-based multianalyte markers. This represents tumor biology and heterogeneity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Roll
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.,West German Cancer Center, Muenster and Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Matthias Weckesser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.,West German Cancer Center, Muenster and Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.,West German Cancer Center, Muenster and Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. .,West German Cancer Center, Muenster and Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
The Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (2020). JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1097/jp9.0000000000000064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
|
17
|
Calabrò D, Argalia G, Ambrosini V. Role of PET/CT and Therapy Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:E1059. [PMID: 33297381 PMCID: PMC7762240 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10121059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are heterogeneous neoplasms with neuroendocrine differentiation that show peculiar clinical and histomorphological features, with variable prognosis. In recent years, advances in knowledge regarding the pathophysiology and heterogeneous clinical presentation, as well as the availability of different diagnostic procedures for panNEN diagnosis and novel therapeutic options for patient clinical management, has led to the recognition of the need for an active multidisciplinary discussion for optimal patient care. Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has become indispensable for the management of panNENs. Several PET radiopharmaceuticals can be used to characterize either panNEN receptor expression or metabolism. The aim of this review is to offer an overview of all the currently used radiopharmaceuticals and of the new upcoming tracers for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), and their clinical impact on therapy management. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide PET/CT (SSA-PET/CT) has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and is recommended for the staging and restaging of any non-insulinoma well-differentiated panNEN cases to carry out detection of unknown primary tumor sites or early relapse and for evaluation of in vivo somatostatin receptors expression (SRE) to select patient candidates for peptide receptor radiometabolic treatment (PRRT) with 90Y or 177Lu and/or cold analogs. SSA-PET/CT also has a strong impact on clinical management, leading to a change in treatment in approximately a third of the cases. Its role for treatment response assessment is still under debate due to the lack of standardized criteria, even though some semiquantitative parameters seem to be able to predict response. [18F]FDG PET/CT generally shows low sensitivity in small growing and well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET; G1 and G2), while it is of utmost importance in the evaluation and management of high-grade NENs and also provides important prognostic information. When positive, [18F]FDG PET/CT impacts therapeutical management, indicating the need for a more aggressive treatment regime. Although FDG positivity does not exclude the patient from PRRT, several studies have demonstrated that it is certainly useful to predict response, even in this setting. The role of [18F]FDOPA for the study of panNET is limited by physiological uptake in the pancreas and is therefore not recommended. Moreover, it provides no information on SRE that has crucial clinical management relevance. Early acquisition of the abdomen and premedication with carbidopa may be useful to increase the accuracy, but further studies are needed to clarify its utility. GLP-1R agonists, such as exendin-4, are particularly useful for benign insulinoma detection, but their accuracy decreases in the case of malignant insulinomas. Being a whole-body imaging technique, exendin-PET/CT gives important preoperative information on tumor size and localization, which is fundamental for surgical planning as resection (enucleation of the lesion or partial pancreatic resection) is the only curative treatment. New upcoming tracers are under study, such as promising SSTR antagonists, which show a favorable biodistribution and higher tumor-to-background ratio that increases tumor detection, especially in the liver. [68Ga]pentixafor, an in vivo marker of CXCR4 expression associated with the behavior of more aggressive tumors, seems to only play a limited role in detecting well-differentiated NET since there is an inverse expression of SSTR2 and CXCR4 in G1 to G3 NETs with an elevation in CXCR4 and a decrease in SSTR2 expression with increasing grade. Other tracers, such as [68Ga]Ga-PSMA, [68Ga]Ga-DATA-TOC, [18F]SiTATE, and [18F]AlF-OC, are also under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta Calabrò
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (V.A.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, DIMES University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Argalia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (V.A.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, DIMES University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Valentina Ambrosini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (G.A.); (V.A.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, DIMES University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhu HC, Li XT, Ji WY, Li S, Sun YS. Desmoid-type fibromatosis: Tumour response assessment using magnetic resonance imaging signal and size criteria. Clin Imaging 2020; 68:111-120. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
19
|
Testoni SGG, Capurso G, Petrone MC, Barbera M, Linzenbold W, Enderle M, Gusmini S, Nicoletti R, Della Torre E, Mariani A, Rossi G, Archibugi L, De Cobelli F, Reni M, Falconi M, Arcidiacono PG. Necrosis volume and Choi criteria predict the response to endoscopic ultrasonography-guided HybridTherm ablation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1511-E1519. [PMID: 33043122 PMCID: PMC7541180 DOI: 10.1055/a-1221-9879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ablation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with HybridTherm-Probe (EUS-HTP) is feasible and safe, but the radiological response and ideal tool to measure it have not been investigated yet. The aims of this study were to: 1) assess the radiological response to EUS-HTP evaluating the vital tumor volume reduction rate, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST1.1) and Choi criteria; 2) determine the prognostic predictive yield of these criteria. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with locally advanced PDAC after primary treatment or unfit for chemotherapy prospectively treated by EUS-HTP. Computed tomography scan was performed 1 month after EUS-HTP to evaluate: 1) vital tumor volume reduction rate (VTVRR) by measuring necrosis and tumor volumes through a computer-aided detection system; and 2) RECIST1.1 and Choi criteria. Results EUS-HTP was feasible in 22 of 31 patients (71 %), with no severe adverse events. Median post-HTP survival was 7 months (1 - 35). Compared to pre-HTP tumor volume, a significant 1-month VTVRR (mean 21.4 %) was observed after EUS-HTP ( P = 0.005). We identified through ROC analysis a VTVRR > 11.46 % as the best cut-off to determine post-HTP 6-month survival outcome (AUC = 0.733; sensitivity = 70.0 %, specificity = 83.3 %). This cut-off was significantly associated with longer overall survival (HR = 0.372; P = 0.039). According to RECIST1.1 and Choi criteria, good responders to EUS-HTP were 60 % and 46.7 %, respectively. Good responders according to Choi, but not to RECIST1.1, had longer survival (HR = 0.407; P = 0.04). Conclusions EUS-HTP induces a significant 1-month VTVRR. This effect is assessed accurately by evaluation of necrosis and tumor volumes. Use of VTVRR and Choi criteria, but not RECIST 1.1 criteria, might identify patients who could benefit clinically from EUS-HTP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Gloria Giulia Testoni
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Capurso
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Barbera
- Department of Radiology & Center for Experimental Imaging, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Simone Gusmini
- Department of Radiology & Center for Experimental Imaging, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Nicoletti
- Department of Radiology & Center for Experimental Imaging, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuel Della Torre
- Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases. Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Mariani
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gemma Rossi
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Livia Archibugi
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco De Cobelli
- Department of Radiology & Center for Experimental Imaging, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Reni
- Oncology Department, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Department, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
- Pancreatico-Biliary Endoscopy & Endosonography Division, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Scientific Institute IRCCS, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Huizing DMV, Aalbersberg EA, Versleijen MWJ, Tesselaar MET, Walraven I, Lahaye MJ, de Wit-van der Veen BJ, Stokkel MPM. Early response assessment and prediction of overall survival after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Cancer Imaging 2020; 20:57. [PMID: 32778165 PMCID: PMC7418334 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-020-00335-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Response after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be evaluated using anatomical imaging (CT/MRI), somatostatin receptor imaging ([68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT), and serum Chromogranin-A (CgA). The aim of this retrospective study is to assess the role of these response evaluation methods and their predictive value for overall survival (OS). Methods Imaging and CgA levels were acquired prior to start of PRRT, and 3 and 9 months after completion. Tumour size was measured on anatomical imaging and response was categorized according to RECIST 1.1 and Choi criteria. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake was quantified in both target lesions depicted on anatomical imaging and separately identified PET target lesions, which were either followed over time or newly identified on each scan with PERCIST-based criteria. Response evaluation methods were compared with Cox regression analyses and Log Rank tests for association with OS. Results A total of 44 patients were included, with median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 26–36 months) and median OS of 39 months (IQR 32mo-not reached)d. Progressive disease after 9 months (according to RECIST 1.1) was significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 9.04 (95% CI 2.10–38.85)], however not compared to patients with partial response. According to Choi criteria, progressive disease was also significantly associated with worse OS compared to stable disease [HR 6.10 (95% CI 1.38–27.05)] and compared to patients with partial response [HR 22.66 (95% CI 2.33–219.99)]. In some patients, new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging. After 3 months, new lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT which were not visible on anatomical imaging, were detected in 4/41 (10%) patients and in another 3/27 (11%) patients after 9 months. However, no associations between change in uptake on 68Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT or serum CgA measurements and OS was observed. Conclusions Progression on anatomical imaging performed 9 months after PRRT is associated with worse OS compared to stable disease or partial response. Although new lesions were detected earlier with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET/CT than with anatomical imaging, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE uptake, and serum CgA after PRRT were not predictive for OS in this cohort with limited number of patients and follow-up time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne M V Huizing
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Else A Aalbersberg
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle W J Versleijen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margot E T Tesselaar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Walraven
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max J Lahaye
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marcel P M Stokkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, ENETS Center of Excellence, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Achieving objective response in treatment of non-resectable neuroendocrine tumors does not predict longer time to progression compared to achieving stable disease. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:466. [PMID: 32448245 PMCID: PMC7247237 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06963-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are several treatment modalities for unresectable neuroendocrine tumors. Traditionally, the aim of these treatments has been to reduce the tumor load; referred to as objective response (OR). Less emphasis has been put on inducing the tumors to stop growing without a reduction in total tumor load; termed as stable disease (SD). We wanted to investigate whether achieving OR compared to obtaining SD predicted a longer time to progression (TTP) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (WHO Grade 1 and 2) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, chemotherapy or molecular targeted therapy. Methods Patients treated with either peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 177Lutetium-DOTA-octreotate, the chemotherapy combination streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil or everolimus were retrospectively assessed to evaluate the effect of the treatments on disease progression. We analyzed the TTP for patients for each treatment modality and compared the TTP between those who achieved OR and those who achieved SD. Results Altogether 56 patients treated with PRRT, 32 treated with streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil and 52 treated with everolimus were included in the analyses. The median TTP for those treated with PRRT and achieving OR was 31 months, the TTP for those achieving SD was 43 months (p = 0,2). For patients treated with streptozotocin/5-fluorouracil the results were: OR: 18 months, SD: 23 months (p = 0,9) and for those treated with everolimus; OR: 9 months, SD: 20 months (p = 0,5), respectively. We found no differences between patients achieving OR compared to SD regarding age, sex, stage, primary tumor location, Ki-67% or ongoing treatment with somatostatin analogues. Conclusions We found no treatment benefit with regard to TTP for our patients that experienced OR compared to those who achieved SD.
Collapse
|
22
|
Signore A, Lauri C, Auletta S, Varani M, Onofrio L, Glaudemans AWJM, Panzuto F, Marchetti P. Radiopharmaceuticals for Breast Cancer and Neuroendocrine Tumors: Two Examples of How Tissue Characterization May Influence the Choice of Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12040781. [PMID: 32218303 PMCID: PMC7226069 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular medicine has gained clinical relevance for the detection and staging of oncological diseases, to guide therapy decision making and for therapy follow-up due to the availability of new highly sensitive hybrid imaging camera systems and the development of new tailored radiopharmaceuticals that target specific molecules. The knowledge of the expression of different receptors on the primary tumor and on metastases is important for both therapeutic and prognostic purposes and several approaches are available aiming to achieve personalized medicine in different oncological diseases. In this review, we describe the use of specific radiopharmaceuticals to image and predict therapy response in breast cancer and neuroendocrine tumors since they represent a paradigmatic example of the importance of tumoral characterization of hormonal receptors in order to plan a tailored treatment. The most attractive radiopharmaceuticals for breast cancer are 16α-[18F]-fluoro-17β-estradiol for PET assessment of the estrogen expression, radiolabeled monoclonal antibody trastuzumab to image the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, but also the imaging of androgen receptors with [18F]-fluorodihydrotestosterone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Signore
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (C.L.); (S.A.); (M.V.); (L.O.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence:
| | - Chiara Lauri
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (C.L.); (S.A.); (M.V.); (L.O.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Sveva Auletta
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (C.L.); (S.A.); (M.V.); (L.O.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Michela Varani
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (C.L.); (S.A.); (M.V.); (L.O.)
| | - Livia Onofrio
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and of Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (C.L.); (S.A.); (M.V.); (L.O.)
| | - Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Francesco Panzuto
- Digestive Disease Unit, AOU Sant’Andrea and ENETS Center of Excellence, 00189 Rome, Italy;
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Oncology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, and IDI-IRCCS, 00189 Rome, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liu Y, Chen W, Cui W, Liu H, Zhou X, Chen L, Li J, Chen M, Chen J, Wang Y. Quantitative Pretreatment CT Parameters as Predictors of Tumor Response of Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastasis to Transcatheter Arterial Bland Embolization. Neuroendocrinology 2020; 110:697-704. [PMID: 31639795 DOI: 10.1159/000504257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether parameters on preprocedural CT can be utilized to predict the response of NETLM to transcatheter arterial bland embolization (TAE). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 135 target lesions from 48 NETLM patients who underwent TAE and with complete preprocedural multiphasic CT. Parameters on preprocedural CT including the longest diameter, mean attenuation value in nonenhanced, arterial, and portal-venous phases were collected from each target lesion. Radiological responses were assessed according to RECIST 1.1. The parameters of responder lesions and nonresponder lesions were compared. Arterial enhancement index (AEI) and portal-venous enhancement index (PEI) were calculated. The predictive function of AEI and PEI on tumor response was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS A total of 72.6% target lesions had a partial response. For patients, the objective response rate was 72.9%. Mean attenuation values of responder lesions were significantly higher than nonresponder lesions in both arterial and portal-venous phases (105.36 ± 37.24 vs. 76.01 ± 19.19, p < 0.001; 96.61 ± 24.04 vs. 82.12 ± 21.37, p = 0.002). ROC curve showed that both AEI and PEI were effective in predicting tumor response (area under the curve [AUC] 0.757, p < 0.001; AUC 0.655, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION AEI and PEI, parameters from evaluation of CT pretreatment attenuation of NETLMs, could predict response to TAE treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiming Liu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Medical Ultrasonics, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenchuan Chen
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Cui
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Haikuan Liu
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangfei Zhou
- Department of Interventional Radiology, General Hospital of Yongmei Group, Yongcheng, China
| | - Luohai Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiaping Li
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Minhu Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Interventional Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Evaluating radiological response in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with sunitinib: comparison of Choi versus RECIST criteria (CRIPNET_ GETNE1504 study). Br J Cancer 2019; 121:537-544. [PMID: 31477779 PMCID: PMC6889276 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0558-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of our study was to analyse the usefulness of Choi criteria versus RECIST in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) treated with sunitinib. METHOD A multicentre, prospective study was conducted in 10 Spanish centres. Computed tomographies, at least every 6 months, were centrally evaluated until tumour progression. RESULTS One hundred and seven patients were included. Median progression-free survival (PFS) by RECIST and Choi were 11.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7-15.9) and 15.8 months (95% CI, 13.9-25.7). PFS by Choi (Kendall's τ = 0.72) exhibited greater correlation with overall survival (OS) than PFS by RECIST (Kendall's τ = 0.43). RECIST incorrectly estimated prognosis in 49.6%. Partial response rate increased from 12.8% to 47.4% with Choi criteria. Twenty-four percent of patients with progressive disease according to Choi had stable disease as per RECIST, overestimating treatment effect. Choi criteria predicted PFS/OS. Changes in attenuation occurred early and accounted for 21% of the variations in tumour volume. Attenuation and tumour growth rate (TGR) were associated with improved survival. CONCLUSION Choi criteria were able to capture sunitinib's activity in a clinically significant manner better than RECIST; their implementation in standard clinical practice shall be strongly considered in PanNET patients treated with this drug.
Collapse
|
25
|
Løitegård T, Berntzen DT, Thiis-Evensen E. The RECIST criteria compared to conventional response evaluation after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms. Ann Nucl Med 2018; 33:147-152. [PMID: 30406360 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-018-1316-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) is the most used radiological method for evaluating response after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. This method may give too positive estimates of response in slow growing tumors as it allows a substantial increase in tumor size before patients are classified as having progressive disease. We wanted to compare RECIST with a conventional method in routine use for estimating treatment effect based on defining any unequivocal increase in size of tumor load as progressive disease. We also wanted to investigate whether any differences had clinical implications. METHODS Patients treated with 177Lutetium-DOTA-octreotate having at least one follow-up radiological response evaluation were included. Radiological examinations were retrospectively evaluated by RECIST and compared to the radiological evaluations performed at regular follow-up examinations. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients were included, 33 (42%) were women, median age 65 years. The primary tumors was located in the small intestine in 35 (44%) and the in the pancreas in 27 (34%) of the patients. Indication for treatment was progressive disease in 71 (90%) patients. Based on RECIST, 67 (85%) patients had objective response or stable disease as best effect versus 59 (75%) patients based on the conventional method (p < 0.001). Median progression free survival was 33 months estimated by RECIST and 28 months estimated with the conventional method (p < 0.001). Eight (10%) patients received tumor-targeted therapy due to progressive disease based on the conventional method while still having stable disease according to RECIST. CONCLUSION Response evaluation after PRRT with RECIST gave more positive estimates for treatment effects compared to a method where any equivocal change in tumor load was regarded as significant. These differences had clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terje Løitegård
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dag T Berntzen
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Espen Thiis-Evensen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Sognsvannsveien 20, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lee L, Ito T, Jensen RT. Imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances, current status, and controversies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 18:837-860. [PMID: 29973077 PMCID: PMC6283410 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1496822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recently, there have been a number of advances in imaging pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs), as well as other neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), which have had a profound effect on the management and treatment of these patients, but in some cases are also associated with controversies. Areas covered: These advances are the result of numerous studies attempting to better define the roles of both cross-sectional imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, with or without fine-needle aspiration, and molecular imaging in both sporadic and inherited panNET syndromes; the increased attempt to develop imaging parameters that correlate with tumor classification or have prognostic value; the rapidly increasing use of molecular imaging in these tumors and the attempt to develop imaging parameters that correlate with treatment/outcome results. Each of these areas and the associated controversies are reviewed. Expert commentary: There have been numerous advances in all aspects of the imaging of panNETs, as well as other NETs, in the last few years. The advances are leading to expanded roles of imaging in the management of these patients and the results being seen in panNETs/GI-NETs with these newer techniques are already being used in more common tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingaku Lee
- a Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science , Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University , Fukuoka , Japan
- b Digestive Diseases Branch , NIDDK, NIH , Bethesda , MD , USA
| | - Tetsuhide Ito
- c Neuroendocrine Tumor Centra, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital International University of Health and Welfare 3-6-45 Momochihama , Sawara-Ku, Fukuoka , Japan
| | - Robert T Jensen
- b Digestive Diseases Branch , NIDDK, NIH , Bethesda , MD , USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tumour growth increased following antiangiogenic interruption: the challenge of tumour evaluation. Anticancer Drugs 2017; 28:1062-1065. [PMID: 28682829 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, led by bevacizumab, are considered the cornerstone of the therapy in metastatic colorectal carcinoma. We present the case of a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer who experienced rapid tumour growth with liver broad invasion after the withdrawal of an antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy, aflibercept. The rebound effect caused by the residual tumour inducing a regrowth after an initial controlled disease has already been stressed in mice and metastatic colorectal cancer patients following bevacizumab interruption. The use of liver volume evaluation was consistent with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria evaluation and might be a useful tool in patients with more than a half liver invasion. We describe for the first time the case of a major liver disease progression, confirmed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours 1.1 criteria and liver volume evaluation, after an antiangiogenic interruption in second line.
Collapse
|