1
|
Smith HS, Regier DA, Goranitis I, Bourke M, IJzerman MJ, Degeling K, Montgomery T, Phillips KA, Wordsworth S, Buchanan J, Marshall DA. Approaches to Incorporation of Preferences into Health Economic Models of Genomic Medicine: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis and Conceptual Framework. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2025:10.1007/s40258-025-00945-0. [PMID: 39832089 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-025-00945-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/02/2025] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Genomic medicine has features that make it preference sensitive and amenable to model-based health economic evaluation. Preferences of patients, caregivers, and clinicians related to the uptake and delivery of genomic medicine technologies and services that are not captured in health state utility weights can affect the intervention's cost-effectiveness and budget impact. However, there is currently no established or agreed-on approach for integrating preference information into economic evaluations. The objective of this study was to explore approaches for incorporating preferences into model-based economic evaluations of genomic medicine and to develop a conceptual framework to consider preferences in health economic models. METHODS We conducted a critical interpretive synthesis of published literature guided by the following question: how have preferences been incorporated into model-based economic evaluations of genomic medicine interventions? We integrated findings from the literature and expert opinion to develop a conceptual framework of ways in which preferences influence economic value in the context of genomic medicine. RESULTS Our synthesis included 14 articles. Revealed and stated preference data were used to estimate choice probabilities and to value outcomes. Our conceptual framework situates preference data in the context of health system, patient, clinician, and family characteristics. Preference data were sourced from clinicians, patients and families impacted by a condition or intervention, and the general public. Evaluations employed various types of models, including discrete event simulation, microsimulation, Markov, and decision tree models. CONCLUSION When evaluating the broad benefits and costs of implementing new interventions, sufficiently accounting for preferences in the form of model inputs and valuation of outcomes in economic evaluations is important to avoid biased implementation decisions. Incorporation of preference data may improve alignment between predicted and real-world uptake and more accurately estimate welfare impacts, and this study provides critical insights to support researchers who seek to incorporate preference information into model-based health economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadley Stevens Smith
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive Suite 401, Boston, MA, USA, 02215.
| | - Dean A Regier
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ilias Goranitis
- Melbourne Health Economics, Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mackenzie Bourke
- Melbourne Health Economics, Centre for Health Policy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Koen Degeling
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Taylor Montgomery
- Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, 401 Park Drive Suite 401, Boston, MA, USA, 02215
| | - Kathryn A Phillips
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, UCSF Center for Translational and Policy Research on Precision Medicine (TRANSPERS), San Fransisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics and Policy Research Unit (HEPRU), Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Curigliano G, Dent R, Llombart-Cussac A, Pegram M, Pusztai L, Turner N, Viale G. Incorporating clinicopathological and molecular risk prediction tools to improve outcomes in early HR+/HER2- breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2023; 9:56. [PMID: 37380659 PMCID: PMC10307886 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-023-00560-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Stratification of recurrence risk is a cornerstone of early breast cancer diagnosis that informs a patient's optimal treatment pathway. Several tools exist that combine clinicopathological and molecular information, including multigene assays, which can estimate risk of recurrence and quantify the potential benefit of different adjuvant treatment modalities. While the tools endorsed by treatment guidelines are supported by level I and II evidence and provide similar prognostic accuracy at the population level, they can yield discordant risk prediction at the individual patient level. This review examines the evidence for these tools in clinical practice and offers a perspective of potential future risk stratification strategies. Experience from clinical trials with cyclin D kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in the setting of hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) early breast cancer is provided as an illustrative example of risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Giuseppe Viale
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Development and validation of an extended Cox prognostic model for patients with ER/PR+ and HER2- breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:338. [PMID: 36224558 PMCID: PMC9555115 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02790-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to explore a new estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)− breast cancer prognostic model, called the extended Cox prognostic model, for determining the cutoff values for multiple continuous prognostic factors and their interaction via the new model concept and variable selection method. Methods A total of 335 patients with ER/PR+ and HER2− breast cancer were enrolled for the final analysis. The primary endpoint was breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Prognostic factors (histological grade, histological type, stage, T, N, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), P53, Ki67, ER, PR, and age) were included in this study. The four continuous variables (Ki67, ER, PR, and age) were partitioned into a series of binary variables that were fitted in the multivariate Cox analysis. A smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) variable selection method was used. Model performance was expressed in discrimination and calibration. Results We developed an extended Cox model with a time threshold of 164-week (more than 3 years) postoperation and developed a user-friendly nomogram based on our extended Cox model to facilitate clinical application. We found that the cutoff values for PR, Ki67, and age were 20%, 60%, and 41–55 years, respectively. There was an interaction between age and PR for patients aged ≥ 41 years and PR ≥ 20% at 164-week postoperation: the older the patients with ER/PR+, HER2−, and PR ≥ 20% were, the lower the survival and more likely to recur and metastasize exceeding 164 weeks (more than 3 years) after surgery. Conclusions Our study offers guidance on the prognosis of patients with ER/PR+ and HER2− breast cancer in China. The new concept can inform modeling and the determination of cutoff values of prognostic factors in the future. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12957-022-02790-0.
Collapse
|
4
|
Acuna N, Plascak JJ, Tsui J, Stroup AM, Llanos AAM. Oncotype DX Test Receipt among Latina/Hispanic Women with Early Invasive Breast Cancer in New Jersey: A Registry-Based Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:5116. [PMID: 34065945 PMCID: PMC8151910 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Oncotype DX® (ODX) is a valid test of breast cancer (BC) recurrence risk and chemotherapy benefit. The purpose of this study was to examine prevalence of and factors associated with receipt of ODX testing among eligible Latinas/Hispanics diagnosed with BC. Sociodemographic and tumor data of BC cases diagnosed between 2008 and 2017 among Latina/Hispanic women (n = 5777) were from the New Jersey State Cancer Registry (NJSCR). Eligibility for ODX testing were based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression models of ODX receipt among eligible women were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by demographic and clinicopathologic factors. One-third of Latinas/Hispanics diagnosed with BC were eligible for ODX testing. Among the eligible, 60.9% received ODX testing. Older age (AOR 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.14), low area-level SES (AOR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.52), and being uninsured (AOR 0.58, 95% CI: 0.39, 0.86) were associated with lower odds of ODX testing. While there was relatively high ODX testing among eligible Latina/Hispanic women with BC in New Jersey, our findings suggest that age, insurance status, and area-level SES contribute to unequal access to genetic testing in this group, which might impact BC outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Acuna
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA; (N.A.); (J.T.)
| | - Jesse J. Plascak
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Jennifer Tsui
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA; (N.A.); (J.T.)
| | - Antoinette M. Stroup
- Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA;
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
- New Jersey State Cancer Registry, New Jersey Department of Health, Trenton, NJ 08625, USA
| | - Adana A. M. Llanos
- Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA;
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giorgi Rossi P, Lebeau A, Canelo-Aybar C, Saz-Parkinson Z, Quinn C, Langendam M, Mcgarrigle H, Warman S, Rigau D, Alonso-Coello P, Broeders M, Graewingholt A, Posso M, Duffy S, Schünemann HJ. Recommendations from the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer for multigene testing to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative. Br J Cancer 2021; 124:1503-1512. [PMID: 33597715 PMCID: PMC8076250 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01247-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Predicting the risk of recurrence and response to chemotherapy in women with early breast cancer is crucial to optimise adjuvant treatment. Despite the common practice of using multigene tests to predict recurrence, existing recommendations are inconsistent. Our aim was to formulate healthcare recommendations for the question “Should multigene tests be used in women who have early invasive breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy?” Methods The European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) Guidelines Development Group (GDG), a multidisciplinary guideline panel including experts and three patients, developed recommendations informed by systematic reviews of the evidence. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used. Four multigene tests were evaluated: the 21-gene recurrence score (21-RS), the 70-gene signature (70-GS), the PAM50 risk of recurrence score (PAM50-RORS), and the 12-gene molecular score (12-MS). Results Five studies (2 marker-based design RCTs, two treatment interaction design RCTs and 1 pooled individual data analysis from observational studies) were included; no eligible studies on PAM50-RORS or 12-MS were identified and the GDG did not formulate recommendations for these tests. Conclusions The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 21-RS for lymph node-negative women (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence), recognising that benefits are probably larger in women at high risk of recurrence based on clinical characteristics. The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 70-GS for women at high clinical risk (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence), and recommends not using 70-GS in women at low clinical risk (strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Giorgi Rossi
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Annette Lebeau
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Preventive Medicine, and Public Health, PhD Programme in Methodology of Biomedical Research and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain
| | - Zuleika Saz-Parkinson
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy. .,Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Health Technology Assessment Agency, Avenida Monforte de Lemos 5, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Cecily Quinn
- St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Miranda Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sue Warman
- Havyatt Lodge, Havyatt Road, Langford, North Somerset, UK
| | - David Rigau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireille Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Margarita Posso
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.,Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stephen Duffy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - Holger J Schünemann
- Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McGRADE Centres; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Expression and subcellular localization of the bromodomain-containing protein 7 is a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2021; 31:423-430. [PMID: 31929348 DOI: 10.1097/cad.0000000000000897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Bromodomain-containing protein 7 (BRD7) is a member of the bromodomain-containing protein family. Previous studies suggest that BRD7 is predominantly localized in the nucleus, wherein it functions as a transcriptional regulator. Several lines of evidence imply a tumour suppressor function for BRD7. However, the importance of BRD7 in the pathogenesis of breast cancer is not well understood. We have investigated the expression, CpG island methylation and subcellular localization of BRD7 in breast cancer cell lines and clinical cases and thereby assessed its prognostic significance by correlating with clinical-pathological features and time-dependent clinical outcomes. We show that nuclear exclusion of BRD7 occurs commonly in breast cancer and is strongly associated with cases expressing wild-type p53. Moreover, clinical outcomes are significantly less favourable in cases with nuclear exclusion or loss of expression than those in which there is nuclear expression of BRD7. Methylation of the CpG island of BRD7 increases in breast cancer relative to normal breast tissue, but there is not an obvious correlation between methylation and reduced expression or between methylation and clinical outcomes. Overall, our results suggest that nuclear exclusion, rather than transcriptional silencing, is a common mechanism by which the tumour suppressor function of wild-type p53 is inhibited in breast cancer, and show that BRD7 is a promising candidate biomarker in breast cancer.
Collapse
|
7
|
Marshall DA, Grazziotin LR, Regier DA, Wordsworth S, Buchanan J, Phillips K, Ijzerman M. Addressing Challenges of Economic Evaluation in Precision Medicine Using Dynamic Simulation Modeling. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 23:566-573. [PMID: 32389221 PMCID: PMC7218800 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this article is to describe the unique challenges and present potential solutions and approaches for economic evaluations of precision medicine (PM) interventions using simulation modeling methods. METHODS Given the large and growing number of PM interventions and applications, methods are needed for economic evaluation of PM that can handle the complexity of cascading decisions and patient-specific heterogeneity reflected in the myriad testing and treatment pathways. Traditional approaches (eg, Markov models) have limitations, and other modeling techniques may be required to overcome these challenges. Dynamic simulation models, such as discrete event simulation and agent-based models, are used to design and develop mathematical representations of complex systems and intervention scenarios to evaluate the consequence of interventions over time from a systems perspective. RESULTS Some of the methodological challenges of modeling PM can be addressed using dynamic simulation models. For example, issues regarding companion diagnostics, combining and sequencing of tests, and diagnostic performance of tests can be addressed by capturing patient-specific pathways in the context of care delivery. Issues regarding patient heterogeneity can be addressed by using patient-level simulation models. CONCLUSION The economic evaluation of PM interventions poses unique methodological challenges that might require new solutions. Simulation models are well suited for economic evaluation in PM because they enable patient-level analyses and can capture the dynamics of interventions in complex systems specific to the context of healthcare service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah A Marshall
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Luiza R Grazziotin
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Dean A Regier
- Alberta Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK; National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, England, UK
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK; National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, England, UK
| | - Kathryn Phillips
- Center for Translational & Policy Research on Personalized Medicine, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at San Franciso, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maarten Ijzerman
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Cancer Health Services Research, University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Porzio R, Cordini C, Rodolfi AM, Brigati F, Ubiali A, Proietto M, Di Nunzio C, Cavanna L. Triple negative endometrial cancer: Incidence and prognosis in a monoinstitutional series of 220 patients. Oncol Lett 2020; 19:2522-2526. [PMID: 32194754 PMCID: PMC7039155 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) represents the most frequently occuring gynecological tumor worldwide. The aim of the present study was to estimate the prognostic value of triple negative phenotype (TNP) in EC, and any associations with to pathological and clinical characteristics. The present study includes 220 cases of patients with EC who underwent to surgery at the Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital of Piacenza (Italy) and the expressions of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and oncoprotein c-erbB-2 (HER2) expression were examined. Pearson's Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the association of TNP cases with variables associated with a worse prognosis. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves. A total of 26 patients (12%) had a TNP, and these cases had a higher percentage of high-risk histology, an advanced stage of disease at the time of diagnosis, with shorter PFS and OS when compared to non-TNP. The present study confirmed that TNP represents prognostic significance in EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Porzio
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Piacenza General Hospital, Piacenza I-29121, Italy
| | - Claudia Cordini
- Department of Pathology, Piacenza General Hospital, Piacenza I-29121, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Rodolfi
- Department of Pathology, Piacenza General Hospital, Piacenza I-29121, Italy
| | - Francesca Brigati
- Department of Pathology, Piacenza General Hospital, Piacenza I-29121, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ubiali
- Department of Molecular Biology Unit, Piacenza General Hospital, Piacenza I-29121, Italy
| | - Manuela Proietto
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Piacenza General Hospital, Piacenza I-29121, Italy
| | - Camilla Di Nunzio
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Piacenza General Hospital, Piacenza I-29121, Italy
| | - Luigi Cavanna
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Piacenza General Hospital, Piacenza I-29121, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jayasekera J, Mandelblatt JS. Systematic Review of the Cost Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Prevention, Screening, and Treatment Interventions. J Clin Oncol 2019; 38:332-350. [PMID: 31804858 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jinani Jayasekera
- Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| | - Jeanne S Mandelblatt
- Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kasztura M, Richard A, Bempong NE, Loncar D, Flahault A. Cost-effectiveness of precision medicine: a scoping review. Int J Public Health 2019; 64:1261-1271. [PMID: 31650223 PMCID: PMC6867980 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-019-01298-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Precision medicine (PM) aims to improve patient outcomes by stratifying or individualizing diagnosis and treatment decisions. Previous reviews found inconclusive evidence as to the cost-effectiveness of PM. The purpose of this scoping review was to describe current research findings on the cost-effectiveness of PM and to identify characteristics of cost-effective interventions. METHODS We searched PubMed with a combination of terms related to PM and economic evaluations and included studies published between 2014 and 2017. RESULTS A total of 83 articles were included, of which two-thirds were published in Europe and the USA. The majority of studies concluded that the PM intervention was at least cost-effective compared to usual care. However, the willingness-to-pay thresholds varied widely. Key factors influencing cost-effectiveness included the prevalence of the genetic condition in the target population, costs of genetic testing and companion treatment and the probability of complications or mortality. CONCLUSIONS This review may help inform decisions about reimbursement, research and development of PM interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Kasztura
- Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Aude Richard
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nefti-Eboni Bempong
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Dejan Loncar
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Antoine Flahault
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Attention-Based Multi-NMF Deep Neural Network with Multimodality Data for Breast Cancer Prognosis Model. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2019; 2019:9523719. [PMID: 31214619 PMCID: PMC6535865 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9523719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Today, it has become a hot issue in cancer research to make precise prognostic prediction for breast cancer patients, which can not only effectively avoid overtreatment and medical resources waste, but also provide scientific basis to help medical staff and patients family members to make right medical decisions. As well known, cancer is a partly inherited disease with various important biological markers, especially the gene expression profile data and clinical data. Therefore, the accuracy of prediction model can be improved by integrating gene expression profile data and clinical data. In this paper, we proposed an end-to-end model, Attention-based Multi-NMF DNN (AMND), which combines clinical data and gene expression data extracted by Multiple Nonnegative Matrix Factorization algorithms (Multi-NMF) for the prognostic prediction of breast cancer. The innovation of this method is highlighted through using clinical data and combining multiple feature selection methods with the help of Attention mechanism. The results of comprehensive performance evaluation show that the proposed model reports better predictive performances than either models only using data of single modality, e.g., gene or clinical, or models based on any single NMF improved methods which only use one of the NMF algorithms to extract features. The performance of our model is competitive or even better than other previously reported models. Meanwhile, AMND can be extended to the survival prediction of other cancer diseases, providing a new strategy for breast cancer prognostic prediction.
Collapse
|
12
|
An Efficient Feature Selection Strategy Based on Multiple Support Vector Machine Technology with Gene Expression Data. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:7538204. [PMID: 30228989 PMCID: PMC6136508 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7538204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2018] [Revised: 07/17/2018] [Accepted: 07/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The application of gene expression data to the diagnosis and classification of cancer has become a hot issue in the field of cancer classification. Gene expression data usually contains a large number of tumor-free data and has the characteristics of high dimensions. In order to select determinant genes related to breast cancer from the initial gene expression data, we propose a new feature selection method, namely, support vector machine based on recursive feature elimination and parameter optimization (SVM-RFE-PO). The grid search (GS) algorithm, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm, and the genetic algorithm (GA) are applied to search the optimal parameters in the feature selection process. Herein, the new feature selection method contains three kinds of algorithms: support vector machine based on recursive feature elimination and grid search (SVM-RFE-GS), support vector machine based on recursive feature elimination and particle swarm optimization (SVM-RFE-PSO), and support vector machine based on recursive feature elimination and genetic algorithm (SVM-RFE-GA). Then the selected optimal feature subsets are used to train the SVM classifier for cancer classification. We also use random forest feature selection (RFFS), random forest feature selection and grid search (RFFS-GS), and minimal redundancy maximal relevance (mRMR) algorithm as feature selection methods to compare the effects of the SVM-RFE-PO algorithm. The results showed that the feature subset obtained by feature selection using SVM-RFE-PSO algorithm results has a better prediction performance of Area Under Curve (AUC) in the testing data set. This algorithm not only is time-saving, but also is capable of extracting more representative and useful genes.
Collapse
|