1
|
David K, Devos G, Narinx N, Antonio L, Devlies W, Deboel L, Schollaert D, Eisenhauer A, Cavalier E, Vanderschueren D, Claessens F, Joniau S, Decallonne B. Changes in bone and mineral homeostasis after short-term androgen deprivation therapy with or without androgen receptor signalling inhibitor - substudy of a single-centre, double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. EBioMedicine 2023; 97:104817. [PMID: 37804569 PMCID: PMC10570709 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have an increased fracture risk. Exploring biomarkers for early bone loss detection is of great interest. METHODS Pre-planned substudy of the ARNEO-trial (NCT03080116): a double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial performed in high-risk PCa patients without bone metastases between March 2019 and April 2021. Patients were 1:1 randomised to treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (degarelix) + androgen receptor signalling inhibitor (ARSI; apalutamide) versus degarelix + matching placebo for 12 weeks prior to prostatectomy. Before and following ADT, serum and 24-h urinary samples were collected. Primary endpoints were changes in calcium-phosphate homeostasis and bone biomarkers. FINDINGS Of the 89 randomised patients, 43 in the degarelix + apalutamide and 44 patients in the degarelix + placebo group were included in this substudy. Serum corrected calcium levels increased similarly in both treatment arms (mean difference +0.04 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval, 0.02; 0.06), and parathyroid hormone and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 levels decreased. Bone resorption markers increased, and stable calcium isotope ratios reflecting net bone mineral balance decreased in serum and urine similarly in both groups. INTERPRETATION This exploratory substudy suggests that 12 weeks of ADT in non-metastatic PCa patients results in early bone loss. Additional treatment with ARSI does not seem to more negatively influence bone loss in the early phase. Future studies should address if these early biomarkers are able to predict fracture risk, and can be implemented in clinical practice for follow-up of bone health in PCa patients under ADT. FUNDING Research Foundation Flanders; KU Leuven; University-Hospitals-Leuven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karel David
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gaëtan Devos
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nick Narinx
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Leen Antonio
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wout Devlies
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ludo Deboel
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dieter Schollaert
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anton Eisenhauer
- Geomar Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Osteolabs GmbH, Kiel, Germany
| | - Etienne Cavalier
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Dirk Vanderschueren
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frank Claessens
- Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Urogenital, Abdominal and Plastic Surgery, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Brigitte Decallonne
- Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Albisinni S, Sarkis J, Diamand R, De Nunzio C. Prebiopsy 68Ga-PSMA PET imaging: can we improve the current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:47-49. [PMID: 36085498 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00593-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
| | - Julien Sarkis
- Department of Urology, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Romain Diamand
- Department of Urology, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Urology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Ospedale Sant'Andrea, Sapienza University, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
AR and PI3K/AKT in Prostate Cancer: A Tale of Two Interconnected Pathways. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24032046. [PMID: 36768370 PMCID: PMC9917224 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24032046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men. The androgen receptor (AR) has a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and progression of PCa. Many therapies targeting AR signaling have been developed over the years. AR signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), including androgen synthesis inhibitors and AR antagonists, have proven to be effective in castration-sensitive PCa (CSPC) and improve survival, but men with castration-resistant PCa (CRPC) continue to have a poor prognosis. Despite a good initial response, drug resistance develops in almost all patients with metastatic CRPC, and ARSIs are no longer effective. Several mechanisms confer resistance to ARSI and include AR mutations but also hyperactivation of other pathways, such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR. This pathway controls key cellular processes, including proliferation and tumor progression, and it is the most frequently deregulated pathway in human cancers. A significant interaction between AR and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway has been shown in PCa. This review centers on the current scene of different AR and PI3K signaling pathway inhibitors, either as monotherapy or in combination treatments in PCa, and the treatment outcomes involved in both preclinical and clinical trials. A PubMed-based literature search was conducted up to November 2022. The most relevant and recent articles were selected to provide essential information and current evidence on the crosstalk between AR and the PI3K signaling pathways. The ClinicalTrials.gov registry was used to report information about clinical studies and their results using the Advanced research tool, filtering for disease and target.
Collapse
|
4
|
Helsen C, Nguyen TT, Lee XY, Eerlings R, Louros N, Schymkowitz J, Rousseau F, Claessens F, Voet A. Exploiting Ligand-binding Domain Dimerization for Development of Novel Androgen Receptor Inhibitors. Mol Cancer Ther 2022; 21:1823-1834. [PMID: 36218067 DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-22-0340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Currently, all clinically used androgen receptor (AR) antagonists target the AR ligand-binding pocket and inhibit T and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) binding. Resistance to these inhibitors in prostate cancer frequently involves AR-dependent mechanisms resulting in a retained AR dependence of the tumor. More effective or alternative AR inhibitors are therefore required to limit progression in these resistant stages. Here, we applied the structural information of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) dimerization interface to screen in silico for inhibitors. A completely new binding site, the Dimerisation Inhibiting Molecules (DIM) pocket, was identified at the LBD dimerization interface. Selection of compounds that fit the DIM pocket via virtual screening identified the DIM20 family of compounds which inhibit AR transactivation and dimerization of the full-length AR as well as the isolated LBDs. Via biolayer interferometry, reversible dose-dependent binding to the LBD was confirmed. While DIM20 does not compete with 3H-DHT for binding in the LBP, it limits the maximal activity of the AR indicative of a noncompetitive binding to the LBD. DIM20 and DIM20.39 specifically inhibit proliferation of AR-positive prostate cancer cell lines, with only marginal effects on AR-negative cell lines such as HEK 293 and PC3. Moreover, combination treatment of DIM compounds with enzalutamide results in synergistic antiproliferative effects which underline the specific mechanism of action of the DIM compounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Helsen
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tien T Nguyen
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Modelling and Design, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Xiao Yin Lee
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roy Eerlings
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nikolaos Louros
- Switch Laboratory, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joost Schymkowitz
- Switch Laboratory, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frederic Rousseau
- Switch Laboratory, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frank Claessens
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arnout Voet
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Modelling and Design, Department of Chemistry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Devos G, Tosco L, Baldewijns M, Gevaert T, Goffin K, Petit V, Mai C, Laenen A, Raskin Y, Van Haute C, Goeman L, De Meerleer G, Berghen C, Devlies W, Claessens F, Van Poppel H, Everaerts W, Joniau S. ARNEO: A Randomized Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Degarelix with or Without Apalutamide Prior to Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2022; 83:508-518. [PMID: 36167599 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients have a high risk of biochemical recurrence and metastatic progression following radical prostatectomy (RP). OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant degarelix plus apalutamide before RP compared with degarelix with a matching placebo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS ARNEO was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II neoadjuvant trial before RP performed between March 2019 and April 2021. Eligible patients had high-risk PCa and were amenable to RP. INTERVENTION Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to degarelix (240-80-80 mg) + apalutamide (240 mg/d) versus degarelix + matching placebo for 3 mo followed by RP. Prior to and following neoadjuvant treatment, pelvic 18F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was the difference in proportions of patients with minimal residual disease (MRD; = residual cancer burden (RCB) ≤0.25 cm3 at final pathology). Secondary endpoints included differences in prostate-specific antigen responses, pathological staging, and change in TNM stage on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/MRI following hormonal treatment. Biomarkers (immunohistochemical staining on prostate biopsy [PTEN, ERG, Ki67, P53, GR, and PSMA] and PSMA PET/MRI-derived characteristics) associated with pathological response (MRD and RCB) were explored. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Patients were randomized to neoadjuvant degarelix + apalutamide (n = 45) or degarelix + matching placebo (n = 44) for 12 wk and underwent RP. Patients in the degarelix + apalutamide arm achieved a significantly higher rate of MRD than those in the control arm (38% vs 9.1%; relative risk [95% confidence interval] = 4.2 [1.5-11], p = 0.002). Patients with PTEN loss in baseline prostate biopsy attained significantly less MRD (11% vs 43%, p = 0.002) and had a higher RCB at final pathology (1.6 vs 0.40 cm3, p < 0.0001) than patients without PTEN loss. Following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, PSMA PET-estimated tumor volumes (1.2 vs 2.5 ml, p = 0.01) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax; 4.3 vs 5.7, p = 0.007) were lower in patients with MRD than in patients without MRD. PSMA PET-estimated volume and PSMA PET SUVmax following neoadjuvant treatment correlated significantly with RCB at final pathology (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In high-risk PCa patients, neoadjuvant degarelix plus apalutamide prior to RP results in a significantly improved pathological response (MRD and RCB) compared with degarelix alone. Our trial results provide a solid hypothesis-generating basis for neoadjuvant phase 3 trials, which are powered to detect differences in long-term oncological outcome following neoadjuvant androgen receptor signaling inhibitor therapy. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we looked at the difference in pathological responses in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with degarelix plus apalutamide or degarelix plus matching placebo prior to radical prostatectomy. We demonstrated that patients treated with degarelix plus apalutamide achieved a significantly better tumor response than patients treated with degarelix plus matching placebo. Long-term follow-up is required to determine whether improved pathological outcome translates into better oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëtan Devos
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lorenzo Tosco
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Thomas Gevaert
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Valentin Petit
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Cindy Mai
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annouschka Laenen
- Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yannic Raskin
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carl Van Haute
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lieven Goeman
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlien Berghen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wout Devlies
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Frank Claessens
- Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Wouter Everaerts
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
An Expert Review on the Combination of Relugolix with Definitive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 113:278-289. [PMID: 34923058 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an integral component in the management of prostate cancer across multiple disease states. Traditionally, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists constituted the backbone of ADT. However, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor hormone (GnRH) antagonists are also available, which offer faster testosterone suppression and reduced likelihood of ADT-related adverse effects compared to LHRH agonists, including the potential for fewer ADT-associated major cardiac events. Until recently, all forms of LHRH agonists and GnRH antagonist formulations are of parenteral administration. However, recently relugolix gained FDA approval as the first oral GnRH antagonist. Relugolix achieves faster and more complete testosterone suppression compared to an LHRH agonist. This translates to more rapid prostate-specific antigen response compared to LHRH agonists. After discontinuation of relugolix, testosterone recovers faster than after GnRH agonists or injectable GnRH antagonist therapy. Overall, these factors provide opportunities for more precisely defined ADT duration when combined with radiation therapy. The rapid onset and offset testosterone suppression with relugolix, however, may require physicians to rethink the mechanism and goals of ADT when prescribing. As an oral formulation, relugolix enables patients to avoid pain and injection site reactions, limit extra office visits for injections, and achieve a shorter duration of experiencing the side effects of castrate testosterone levels. This convenience and tolerability may enhance physicians' willingness to prescribe ADT and patients' feeling of control over their ADT course, but the potential advantages are accompanied by the risks of patients choosing to discontinue therapy to escape side effects of ADT. This article focuses on different aspects of what is known and unknown regarding the optimal use of ADT and radiation therapy, and how relugolix, due to its properties, fit into our current treatment paradigms for localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
7
|
Marvaso G, Vischioni B, Pepa M, Zaffaroni M, Volpe S, Patti F, Bellerba F, Gandini S, Comi S, Corrao G, Zerini D, Augugliaro M, Fodor C, Russo S, Molinelli S, Ciocca M, Ricotti R, Valvo F, Giandini T, Avuzzi B, Valdagni R, De Cobelli O, Cattani F, Orlandi E, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Orecchia R. Mixed-Beam Approach for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Carbon-Ion Boost Followed by Photon Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy: Preliminary Results of Phase II Trial AIRC-IG-14300. Front Oncol 2021; 11:778729. [PMID: 34869026 PMCID: PMC8635961 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.778729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study represents a descriptive analysis of preliminary results of a Phase II trial on a novel mixed beam radiotherapy (RT) approach, consisting of carbon ions RT (CIRT) followed by intensity-modulated photon RT, in combination with hormonal therapy, for high-risk prostate cancer (HR PCa) with a special focus on acute toxicity. Methods Primary endpoint was the evaluation of safety in terms of acute toxicity. Secondary endpoints were early and long-term tolerability of treatment, quality of life (QoL), and efficacy. Data on acute and late toxicities were collected according to RTOG/EORTC. QoL of enrolled patients was assessed by IPSS, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-PR25, and sexual activity by IIEF-5. Results Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study, but only 15 completed so far the RT course and were included. Immediately after CIRT, no patients experienced GI/GU toxicity. At 1 and 3 months from the whole course RT completion, no GI/GU toxicities greater than grade 2 were observed. QoL scores were overall satisfactory. Conclusions The feasibility of the proposed mixed treatment schedule was assessed, and an excellent acute toxicity profile was recorded. Such findings instil confidence in the continuation of this mixed approach, with evaluation of long-term tolerability and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Vischioni
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Patti
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.,Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Federica Bellerba
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Comi
- Medical Physics Unit, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Zerini
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Russo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Rosalinda Ricotti
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Valvo
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Tommaso Giandini
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Avuzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Radiation Oncology 1, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Division of Urology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Medical Physics Unit, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiotherapy, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO), European Institute of Oncology Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:739-762. [PMID: 34526701 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00514-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with curative intent are at an increased risk of biochemical recurrence, metastatic progression and cancer-related death compared with patients treated for low-risk or intermediate-risk disease. Thus, these patients often need multimodal therapy to achieve complete disease control. Over the past two decades, multiple studies on the use of neoadjuvant treatment have been performed using conventional androgen deprivation therapy, which comprises luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists and/or first-line anti-androgens. However, despite results from these studies demonstrating a reduction in positive surgical margins and tumour volume, no benefit has been observed in hard oncological end points, such as cancer-related death. The introduction of potent androgen receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSIs), such as abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide and darolutamide, has led to a renewed interest in using neoadjuvant hormonal treatment in high-risk prostate cancer. The addition of ARSIs to androgen deprivation therapy has demonstrated substantial survival benefits in the metastatic castration-resistant, non-metastatic castration-resistant and metastatic hormone-sensitive settings. Intuitively, a similar survival effect can be expected when applying ARSIs as a neoadjuvant strategy in high-risk prostate cancer. Most studies on neoadjuvant ARSIs use a pathological end point as a surrogate for long-term oncological outcome. However, no consensus yet exists regarding the ideal definition of pathological response following neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and pathologists might encounter difficulties in determining pathological response in hormonally treated prostate specimens. The neoadjuvant setting also provides opportunities to gain insight into resistance mechanisms against neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and, consequently, to guide personalized therapy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Martinez J, Subramanian K, Margolis D, O'Dwyer E, Osborne J, Jhanwar Y, Nagar H, Williams N, RoyChoudhury A, Madera G, Babich J, Huicochea Castellanos S. 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET/MRI is superior to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in men with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer: A prospective single-institutional study. Transl Oncol 2021; 15:101242. [PMID: 34649151 PMCID: PMC8517922 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PSMA PET/MRI has a higher true positive rate and sensitivity than mpMRI in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. The true positive rate for PSMA PET/MRI was significantly greater in patients who were post prostatectomy for primary treatment. 40% of patients with a PSA value less than 0.2 ng/mL had a positive PSMA PET/MRI read compared to 9% on MRI.
Background The primary objective was to compare the overall diagnostic performance, presented as detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PSMA PET/MRI) versus conventional, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in a population of patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. In conjunction with this analysis, secondary objectives included the evaluation of the detection rate stratified by PSA levels and primary treatment modality. Methods A total of 165 PSMA PET MRI were performed from April 2018 to May 2021, of whom 108 were presenting for biochemical recurrent disease. The PSMA PET vertex to thigh were read by two different board-certified nuclear medicine physicians while the MRI head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis (with dedicated, PI-RADS compliant multiparametric prostate MRI) were read by two board certified diagnostic radiologists. Analysis PSMA PET/MRI had a higher detection rate than mpMRI when evaluating patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) with similar results demonstrated when sub-analysis was performed using PSA levels, primary treatment modality, and time since androgen deprivation therapy. Our study also showed PSMA PET/MRI had a higher sensitivity than mpMRI. Discussion Our findings demonstrate that PSMA PET/MRI is a better imaging modality in the detection of disease in the setting of BCR when compared to MRI alone. Combined utility with PSMA PET/MRI is a powerful tool which can aid in not only the detection of disease, but also guide in treatment planning for prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juana Martinez
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Kritika Subramanian
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | - Daniel Margolis
- Division of Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elisabeth O'Dwyer
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA; Division of Body Imaging, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joseph Osborne
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Yuliya Jhanwar
- Department of Radiology, CareMount Medical, Mount Kisco, NY, USA
| | - Himanshu Nagar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Williams
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arindam RoyChoudhury
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gabriela Madera
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Babich
- Division of Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sandra Huicochea Castellanos
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marvaso G, Corrao G, Zaffaroni M, Pepa M, Augugliaro M, Volpe S, Musi G, Luzzago S, Mistretta FA, Verri E, Cossu Rocca M, Ferro M, Petralia G, Nolè F, De Cobelli O, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Therapeutic Sequences in the Treatment of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Paving the Way Towards Multimodal Tailored Approaches. Front Oncol 2021; 11:732766. [PMID: 34422672 PMCID: PMC8371196 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.732766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Various definitions are currently in use to describe high-risk prostate cancer. This variety in definitions is important for patient counseling, since predicted outcomes depend on which classification is applied to identify patient’s prostate cancer risk category. Historically, strategies for the treatment of localized high-risk prostate cancer comprise local approaches such as surgery and radiotherapy, as well as systemic approaches such as hormonal therapy. Nevertheless, since high-risk prostate cancer patients remain the group with higher-risk of treatment failure and mortality rates, nowadays, novel treatment strategies, comprising hypofractionated-radiotherapy, second-generation antiandrogens, and hadrontherapy, are being explored in order to improve their long-term oncological outcomes. This narrative review aims to report the current management of high-risk prostate cancer and to explore the future perspectives in this clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Corrao
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Augugliaro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Volpe
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Elena Verri
- Department of Medical Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Cossu Rocca
- Department of Medical Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Precision Imaging and Research Unit, Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Nolè
- Medical Oncology Division of Urogenital & Head & Neck Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moussa M, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Chakra MA, Fragkoulis C. Current and emerging gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists for the treatment of prostate cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22:2373-2381. [PMID: 34187259 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1948012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction:Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is currently the backbone treatment of metastatic prostate cancer and is also used in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Castration may be achieved either by bilateral orchiectomy or by administration of LHRH agonists or GnRH antagonists.Areas covered: In this article, the authors assess the current and emerging role of GnRH antagonists for the treatment of prostate cancer focusing on oncological results and safety (i.e. cardiovascular risk). In addition, updated data regarding the first orally administered GnRH antagonist, relugolix, is presented.Expert opinion: Studies demonstrate that GnRH antagonists are at least equal with LHRH agonists in terms of testosterone suppression and PSA progression free survival with a major advantage being rapid testosterone suppression. Thus, the optimal group of patients included symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer patients especially if cardiovascular comorbidities or LUTS are also present. Emerging data regarding benefit of the use of GnRH antagonists in patients with concomitant cardiovascular disease are of great interest. Relugolix has emerged as the first orally administered GnRH antagonist able to achieve and maintain testosterone castration levels and it is associated with a profound reduction of major cardiovascular events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Moussa
- Department of Urology, Al Zahraa Hospital, University Medical Center, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- 2nd Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Dellis
- 2nd Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Sismanoglio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Aretaieion Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Mohamed Abou Chakra
- Department of Urology, Al Zahraa Hospital, University Medical Center, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang L, Zhao H, Wu B, Zha Z, Yuan J, Feng Y. The Impact of Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy on Surgical and Oncological Outcomes for Patients With Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 10:615801. [PMID: 33628732 PMCID: PMC7897693 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.615801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This systematic study aimed to assess and compare the comprehensive evidence regarding the impact of neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT) on surgical and oncological outcomes of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) before radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods Literature searches were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases, we identified relevant studies published before July 2020. The pooled effect sizes were calculated in terms of the odds ratios (ORs)/standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the fixed or random-effects model. Results We identified 22 clinical trials (6 randomized and 16 cohort) including 20,199 patients with PCa. Our meta-analysis showed no significant differences in body mass index (SMD = 0.10, 95% CI: -0.08-0.29, p = 0.274) and biopsy Gleason score (GS) (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.76-2.35 p = 0.321) between the two groups. However, the NHT group had a higher mean age (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.07-0.31, p = 0.001), preoperative prostate-specific antigen (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.19-0.75, p = 0.001), and clinic tumor stage (OR = 2.24, 95% CI: 1.53-3.29, p < 0.001). Compared to the RP group, the NHT group had lower positive surgical margins (PSMs) rate (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.67, p < 0.001) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate (OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26-0.83, p = 0.009). Between both groups, there were no significant differences in estimated blood loss (SMD = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.24-0.13, p = 0.556), operation time (SMD = 0.20, 95% CI: -0.12-0.51, p = 0.219), pathological tumor stage (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54-1.06, p = 0.104), specimen GS (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.49-1.68, p = 0.756), and lymph node involvement (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.40-1.45, p = 0.404). Conclusions NHT prior to RP appeared to reduce the tumor stage, PSMs rate, and risk of BCR in patients with PCa. According to our data, NHT may be more suitable for older patients with higher tumor stage. Besides, NHT may not increase the surgical difficulty of RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Hu Zhao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Zhenlei Zha
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Jun Yuan
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Yejun Feng
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ashrafi AN, Yip W, Aron M. Neoadjuvant Therapy in High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Indian J Urol 2020; 36:251-261. [PMID: 33376260 PMCID: PMC7759181 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_115_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
High-risk prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with higher rates of biochemical recurrence, clinical recurrence, metastasis, and PCa-specific death, compared to low-and intermediate-risk disease. Herein, we review the various definitions of high-risk PCa, describe the rationale for neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical prostatectomy, and summarize the contemporary data on neoadjuvant therapies. Since the 1990s, several randomized trials of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) have consistently demonstrated improved pathological parameters, specifically tumor downstaging and reduced extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and positive surgical margins without improvements in cancer-specific or overall survival. These studies, however, were not exclusive to high-risk patients and were limited by suboptimal follow-up periods. Newer studies of neoadjuvant ADT in high-risk PCa show promising pathological and oncological outcomes. Recent level 1 data suggests neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (CHT) may improve longer-term survival in high-risk PCa. Immunologic neoadjuvant trials are in their infancy, and further study is required. Neoadjuvant therapies may be promising additions to the multimodal therapeutic landscape of high-risk and locally advanced PCa in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akbar N. Ashrafi
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medical Center of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Division of Surgery, North Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Wesley Yip
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medical Center of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Monish Aron
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck Medical Center of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Barbosa FG, Queiroz MA, Ferraro DA, Nunes RF, Dreyer PR, Zaniboni EC, Costa LB, Bastos DA, Marin JFG, Buchpiguel CA. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET: Therapy Response Assessment in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 2020; 40:1412-1430. [PMID: 32762625 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2020200058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Therapy response assessment is a critical step in cancer management, leading clinicians to optimize the use of therapeutic options during the course of the disease. Imaging is a pivotal biomarker for therapy response evaluation in oncology and has gained wider use through the development of reproducible data-based guidelines, of which the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors is the most successful example. Disease-specific criteria have also been proposed, and the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria are the mainstay for prostate cancer (PC). However, conventional imaging evaluation in metastatic PC has several limitations, including (a) the inability to detect small-volume disease, (b) the high prevalence of bone (nonmeasurable) lesions at imaging, and (c) the established role of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as the biomarker of choice for response assessment and disease progression. In addition, there are an increasing number of newer treatment options with various effects on imaging features. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has improved patient selection for newer treatments, such as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or radionuclide therapy. The role of PSMA PET in response assessment for many metastatic PC therapeutic options (MDT, androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, radionuclide therapy, and immunotherapy) is an evolving issue, with emerging data showing good correlation with PSA levels and clinical outcome. However, there are specific implications of each therapy (especially androgen deprivation therapy and immunotherapy) on PSMA expression by PC cells, leading to potential pitfalls and inaccuracies that must be known by radiologists. Despite some limitations, PSMA PET is addressing gaps left by conventional imaging methods (eg, CT and bone scanning) and nonimaging biomarkers (PSA levels) in metastatic PC therapy response assessment, a role that can be improved with advances like refinement of interpretation criteria and whole-body tumor burden quantification.© RSNA, 2020See discussion on this article by Barwick and Castellucci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe G Barbosa
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Marcelo A Queiroz
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Daniela A Ferraro
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Rafael F Nunes
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Priscilla R Dreyer
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Elaine C Zaniboni
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Larissa B Costa
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Diogo A Bastos
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - José Flávio G Marin
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| | - Carlos A Buchpiguel
- From the Departments of Radiology (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.) and Oncology (D.A.B.), Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Rua Dona Adma Jafet 115, São Paulo, SP, CEP 01308-060, Brazil (F.G.B., M.A.Q., R.F.N., P.R.D., E.C.Z., L.B.C., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); Department of Radiology and Oncology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil (M.A.Q., D.A.B., J.F.G.M., C.A.B.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland (D.A.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pharmacological polyamine catabolism upregulation with methionine salvage pathway inhibition as an effective prostate cancer therapy. Nat Commun 2020; 11:52. [PMID: 31911608 PMCID: PMC6946658 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13950-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostatic luminal epithelial cells secrete high levels of acetylated polyamines into the prostatic lumen, sensitizing them to perturbations of connected metabolic pathways. Enhanced flux is driven by spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT) activity, which acetylates polyamines leading to their secretion and drives biosynthetic demand. The methionine salvage pathway recycles one-carbon units lost to polyamine biosynthesis to the methionine cycle to overcome stress. Prostate cancer (CaP) relies on methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP), the rate-limiting enzyme, to relieve strain. Here, we show that inhibition of MTAP alongside SSAT upregulation is synergistic in androgen sensitive and castration recurrent CaP models in vitro and in vivo. The combination treatment increases apoptosis in radical prostatectomy ex vivo explant samples. This unique high metabolic flux through polyamine biosynthesis and connected one carbon metabolism in CaP creates a metabolic dependency. Enhancing this flux while simultaneously targeting this dependency in prostate cancer results in an effective therapeutic approach potentially translatable to the clinic. Prostate cancer cells depend on MTAP, the rate-limiting enzyme involved in the methionine salvage pathway, to cope with increased polyamine biosynthesis. Here, the authors show that inducing upregulation of polyamine biosynthesis and targeting MTAP synergize to increase apoptosis in prostate cancer cells.
Collapse
|
16
|
Brunner R, Buck B, Giffen Z, Murtagh D, Lewis T, Gatto-Weis C, Sindhwani P. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk prostatic adenocarcinoma. IJU Case Rep 2019; 2:61-64. [PMID: 32743374 PMCID: PMC7292178 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk, locally advanced prostate cancer remains an understudied area of prostate cancer. Chemotherapy continues to be a viable option. The combination with surgery may be desired but lacks data for complete recommendation. Case presentation We demonstrate the successful utilization of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant arena. A 70-year-old male was diagnosed with high-risk prostate cancer on biopsy. Upon multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, the patient had local rectal wall invasion and stage T4 N0 M0 after a negative bone scan. After treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy and docetaxel, repeat multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging showed regression of rectal invasion. The patient elected for prostatectomy and avoided proctectomy and colostomy. The patient's postoperative prostate-specific antigen was undetectable on initial follow-up. Conclusion We show that neoadjuvant chemotherapy merits further study and may provide a more permanent surgical option for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Brunner
- Department of Urology College of Medicine and Life Sciences The University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA
| | - Bradley Buck
- Department of Urology College of Medicine and Life Sciences The University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA
| | - Zane Giffen
- Department of Urology College of Medicine and Life Sciences The University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA
| | - Daniel Murtagh
- Department of Urology College of Medicine and Life Sciences The University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA
| | - Terrence Lewis
- Department of Radiology College of Medicine and Life Sciences The University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA
| | - Cara Gatto-Weis
- Department of Pathology College of Medicine and Life Sciences The University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA
| | - Puneet Sindhwani
- Department of Urology College of Medicine and Life Sciences The University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA
| |
Collapse
|