1
|
Xu Y, Li L, Yang W, Zhang K, Zhang Z, Yu C, Qiu J, Cai L, Gong Y, Zhang Z, Zhou J, Gong K. TRAF2 promotes M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophage infiltration, angiogenesis and cancer progression by inhibiting autophagy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2023; 42:159. [PMID: 37415241 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02742-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains a major challenge in clinical practice, and the construction of more reliable prognostic prediction models and the further elucidation of key molecular mechanisms of tumor progression are topics in urgent need of in-depth investigation. METHODS We used CIBERSORT to estimate the proportion of 22 tumor-infiltrating immune cell types in the TCGA-KIRC cohort. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression analysis were used to build risk prediction models. Expression patterns and clinical significance of TRAF2 were determined through bioinformatics analysis, real-time qPCR, Western Blot, immunohistochemistry. GSEA analysis, transmission electron microscopy, 2D/3D colony formation assay, cell migration and invasion assay, and tube-formation assay were used to investigate the underlying function and mechanism of the TRAF2/M2 macrophage/autophagy axis. RESULTS We constructed a novel prognostic prediction model based on M2 macrophage-related genes, which was identified as an accurate, independent and specific prognostic risk model for ccRCC patients. A reliable nomogram was constructed to predict 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival for patients with ccRCC. As one of the constituent genes of the risk model, TRAF2 was determined to be upregulated in ccRCC and associated with poor clinical prognosis. We found that TRAF2 promotes malignant progression of ccRCC by regulating macrophage polarization, migration and angiogenesis. Mechanistically, we found that TRAF2 promotes the polarization of M2 macrophages, and this chemotaxis is achieved in an autophagy-dependent pathway. Orthotopic tumor growth assay results revealed that TRAF2 plays a key role as a promotor of ccRCC growth and metastasis. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, this risk model is highly predictive of prognostic in ccRCC patients, which is expected to promote improved treatment evaluation and comprehensive management of ccRCC. Moreover, our findings reveal that the TRAF2/M2 macrophage/autophagy axis plays a key regulatory role in the malignant progression of ccRCC, and suggest that TRAF2 is a potential novel therapeutic target for advanced ccRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yawei Xu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Lei Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Wuping Yang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Kenan Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zedan Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Chaojian Yu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Jianhui Qiu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Lin Cai
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Yanqing Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zheng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Jingcheng Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Kan Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Urology, Peking University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Urogenital Diseases (Male) Molecular Diagnosis and Treatment Center, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Carril-Ajuria L, Colomba E, Romero-Ferreiro C, Cerbone L, Ratta R, Barthelemy P, Vindry C, Fléchon A, Cherifi F, Boughalem E, Linassier C, Fornarini G, Rebuzzi SE, Gross-Goupil M, Saldana C, Martin-Soberón M, de Velasco G, Manneh R, Pernaut C, Sanchez de Torre A, Flippot R, Escudier B, Albiges L. Frontline immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with poor performance status. Eur J Cancer 2023; 180:21-29. [PMID: 36527973 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy (ICI-based combination) is a new standard of care for metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the frontline setting. Patients with poor performance status (PS) (≥2) were excluded from pivotal trials. Hence, the activity and safety of ICI-based combination therapy in this group of patients is still unknown. METHODS We performed a multicentre retrospective study of PS ≥2 mRCC patients who received frontline ICI-based combination, either nivolumab-ipilimumab (NI) or pembrolizumab-axitinib (AP). Patients' characteristics, clinical outcomes, and toxicity were collected. We analysed overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS) and grade ≥3 adverse events (G ≥ 3AEs). The association between the predictive biomarker IPI (immune prognostic index) and ORR/PFS/OS was also evaluated. RESULTS We identified 70 mRCC patients with PS ≥2 treated with ICI-based combination across 14 institutions between October 2017 and December 2021, including 45 and 25 patients were treated with NI and AP, respectively. Median age at diagnosis was 63 years, 51 (73%) were male, only 17 (24%) had prior nephrectomy, 50 (71%) had synchronous metastatic disease at diagnosis, and 16 (23%) had brain metastases. Sixty-one (87%) and 9 (13%) patients had ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) PS 2 and 3, respectively, and 25 (36%) and 45 (64%) patients were intermediate and poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk, respectively. Among all, 91% were clear cell RCC, 7 patients had sarcomatoid features. At the time of the analysis (median follow-up 11.1 months), 41% patients were dead. Median PFS and mOS in the entire cohort were 5.4 months and 16.0 months, respectively; ORR was 31%. No significant differences in ORR, PFS, OS, or G ≥3AEs were seen between NI and AP. The intermediate and poor IPI groups were significantly associated with reduced ORR and shorter PFS. CONCLUSION We report the first cohort of PS ≥2 mRCC patients treated with frontline ICI-based combination therapy. The survival outcomes in our cohort were inferior to that reported in pivotal trials. No significant differences in ORR, PFS, OS or toxicity were seen between NI and AP. Prospective real-world studies are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emeline Colomba
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Carmen Romero-Ferreiro
- Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria, Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Madrid, Spain
| | - Luigi Cerbone
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Philippe Barthelemy
- Medical Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg/ICANS, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Aude Fléchon
- Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 69008 Lyon, France
| | | | - Elouen Boughalem
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, 49055 Angers, France
| | - Claude Linassier
- Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Giuseppe Fornarini
- Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 1 RCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Sara E Rebuzzi
- Medical Oncology, U.O. Oncologia Medica 1 RCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marine Gross-Goupil
- Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | - Carolina Saldana
- Medical Oncology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Univ Paris Est Creteil, Créteil, France
| | | | | | - Ray Manneh
- Sociedad de Oncología y Hematología del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia
| | - Cristina Pernaut
- Medical Oncology, University Hopital Severo Ochoa, Leganés, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ronan Flippot
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Bernard Escudier
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paiva CE, Preto DD, de Lima C, Paiva BSR. To Treat or Not to Treat? Dilemmas when Deciding on Antineoplastic Treatment in Patients With Far Advanced Cancers. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231176639. [PMID: 37178323 PMCID: PMC10184254 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231176639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with advanced cancers and their oncologists are often faced with difficult treatment decisions, especially when there are borderline situations of expected benefit or increased risk of complications. In this narrative review, we will explore the decision-making process for patients with advanced cancers and provide insights on how to approach this complex task, while didactically dividing the oncologist's assessments according to a mnemonic rule of the ABCDE of therapeutic decision-making. Part A (advanced cancer) recalls that the rule is to be used specifically for advanced cancers. Parts B (potential benefits) and C (clinical conditions and risks) represents the traditional risk vs benefit scale. In Part D, we discuss ways to identify and understand patients' desires, values, preferences, and beliefs. The prognostic estimation, from Part E, may function as an "adjust" for the antineoplastic treatment decision-making. Treatment decisions need to be conducted by skilled oncologists, in a patient-centered care, aiming to promote valuable oncology with lower rates of aggressive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Eduardo Paiva
- Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Daniel D’Almeida Preto
- Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Crislaine de Lima
- Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chen L, Wu M, Zheng X, Zhang Y, Zhao J. Long-term outcome of renal cell carcinoma in patients with HIV who undergo surgery. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:605. [PMID: 35804319 PMCID: PMC9270790 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07592-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People living with HIV (PLWH) have a higher risk for cancer compared to the general population. The prevalence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in PLWH has gradually increased in recent years, but relevant data on outcomes after surgery are scarce. We thus evaluated long-term outcomes after surgery in RCC patients with and without HIV. Methods This retrospective study included 67 patients with RCC, both HIV positive or negative, who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital between January 2012 and January 2021. Demographic details, clinical data, and cancer status were collected. We set the day of surgery as the baseline. The co-primary end points in this time-to-event analysis were overall survival and progression-free survival. We used a multivariate Cox model to compare the prognosis of PLWH and HIV-negative patients and present Kaplan–Meier curves for the co-primary end points. Results Of 261 consecutive patients, 18 patients who forwent treatment before surgery, 133 cases with incomplete data, 16 patients classified as clinical stage IV, 11 PLWH patients did not received antiretroviral therapy and 16 patients with metastasis were excluded from the main analysis. Of the remaining 67 patients, 33 individuals had HIV and the other 34 did not. The median overall survival was 74.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 64.6 to 85.2) in PLWH and 96.4 months (95% CI = 90.0 to 102.9) in the HIV-negative group. Progression-free survival was 66.4 months (95% CI = 53.5 to 79.3) and 90.6 months (95% CI = 81.1 to 100.1), respectively. RCC patients with HIV who underwent surgery had a shorter survival time (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.1 to 7.0, p = 0.016) and an increased incidence of tumor progression (HR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.1 to 6.8, p = 0.028). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that a lower ratio of CD4+ T cells to CD8+ T cells (adjusted odds ratio = 0.092, 95% CI = 0.01 to 0.70, p = 0.022) was associated with worse survival among PLWH. Conclusion In this retrospective analysis of RCC patients who underwent surgery, PLWH had worse overall survival and shorter progression-free survival compared to HIV-negative cases. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07592-z. First Chinese study of HIV and RCC. Prognostic risk factor in PLWH with RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Chen
- Department of Urology and Lithotripsy Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Menghua Wu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Zheng
- Department of Urology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Youan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jimao Zhao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jensen CE, Vohra SN, Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Muss HB, Lichtman EI, Rubinstein SM, Wood WA, Mangieri NJ, Jamison L, Grant SJ, Tuchman SA. Geriatric-assessment-identified functional deficits among adults with multiple myeloma with normal performance status. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:182-189. [PMID: 34389255 PMCID: PMC8828804 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Findings from a brief geriatric assessment (GA) in a cohort of adults with multiple myeloma (MM) are presented, with particular attention to the utility of the GA in identifying important deficits in adults judged to have a normal Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS ≥ 80). MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults age 18 and older with MM were recruited into an observational study from 2018 to 2020. A modified Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) GA was administered at enrollment. Enrollees also completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Core 30 questionnaire (QLQ-C30), with subscales of physical, social, role, and cognitive functioning (range 0-100; higher values indicate better function). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for the full cohort and stratified by concurrent KPS (score < 80 vs ≥ 80). RESULTS Among 89 adults, the mean age was 69.1 years, 68% were aged ≥65 years, and 70% were white. In this cohort, 78% had KPS ≥ 80. Among those with KPS ≥ 80, functional impairments (Timed Up and Go ≥14 s and dependence in ≥1 instrumental activity of daily living) were seen in 30% and 21%, respectively, with 11% reporting ≥1 fall in the prior 6 months. At least two GA-identified deficits were detected in 50% of the overall cohort and in 41% of those with KPS ≥ 80. Among those with KPS ≥ 80, self-reported physical impairment on EORTC QLQ-C30 was noted by 34%. CONCLUSION Using a modified CARG GA and EORTC questionnaire, functional impairments were identified among adults considered to have a good performance status based on a KPS (≥ 80). Future studies should focus on using GA measures for therapy assignment and identifying opportunities for intervening upon GA-identified deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher E Jensen
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Sanah N Vohra
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB# 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Kirsten A Nyrop
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Allison M Deal
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Eben I Lichtman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Samuel M Rubinstein
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - William A Wood
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Nicholas J Mangieri
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Lee Jamison
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Shakira J Grant
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| | - Sascha A Tuchman
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 170 Manning Drive, Houpt Building, CB# 7305, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Drive, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Optimizing Perioperative Treatment for Kidney Cancer. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
7
|
Chen PH, Yeh DC, Tung HH, Lin CY. Prognostic and predictive factors of eribulin in patients with heavily pre-treated metastatic breast cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27859. [PMID: 34964753 PMCID: PMC8615315 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
A predictive marker for efficacy of eribulin administered as different lines of treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has not been identified. We aimed to determine the predictive factors for efficacy of eribulin administered as different lines of treatment in MBC patients.This restrospective cohort study included 49 heavily pre-treated MBC patients who received either eribulin monotherapy or combination therapy with eribulin and anti-Her2 therapy. Associations between clinical response of eribulin-based treatment, time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and possible predictive markers were investigated.Patients' median age was 55 years; 65% were ER+; 43% were HER2+; and 16% were triple-negative. Median TTF was 5.23 months and longer in non-visceral metastases patients. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status was 0-1; eribulin as ≥2nd-line treatment; eribulin combined with dual blockades; lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) ≥3; and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) <0.4. In patients with eribulin as >3rd-line treatment, univariate analysis showed that ECOG status was 0-1, and LMR ≥3 and MLR <0.4 were associated with a low risk of TTF. Multivariate analysis showed that ECOG status 0-1 was an independent protective factor. Leukopenia and neutropenia were the most common manageable adverse events.ECOG status is an independent predictor for TTF, while LMR and MLR may have an interactive effect with other biomarkers (e.g., ECOG status) to predict response in MBC patients receiving eribulin as ≥2nd-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Hsin Chen
- Department of Breast Medical Center, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tanzi Dist., Taichung City, Taiwan
- School of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Beitou Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Dah-Cherng Yeh
- Department of Breast Medical Center, Cheng Ching Hospital Chung Kang Branch, Xitun Dist., Taichung City, Taiwan
| | - Heng-Hsin Tung
- School of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Beitou Dist., Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Yao Lin
- Department of Breast Medical Center, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tanzi Dist., Taichung City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hamza Habib M, Arnold RM, Rosielle DA. Functional Status Assessment in Serious Illness #416. J Palliat Med 2021; 24:946-948. [PMID: 34061666 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
9
|
Kim SH, Park B, Hwang EC, Hong SH, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Byun SS, Chung J. A Retrospective, Multicenter, Long-Term Follow-Up Analysis of the Prognostic Characteristics of Recurring Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Partial or Radical Nephrectomy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:653002. [PMID: 34262859 PMCID: PMC8273547 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.653002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of nephrectomized patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (nmRCC) and local recurrence without distant metastasis (LR group), those with metastasis without local recurrence (MET group), and those with both local recurrence and metastasis (BOTH group). This retrospective multicenter study included 464 curatively nephrectomized patients with nmRCC and disease recurrence between 2000 and 2012; the follow-up period was until 2017. After adjusting for significant clinicopathological factors using Cox proportional hazard models, CSS and OS were compared between the MET (n = 50, 10.7%), BOTH (n = 95, 20.5%), and LR (n = 319, 68.8%) groups. The CSS and OS rates were 34.7 and 6.5% after a median follow-up of 43.9 months, respectively. After adjusting for significant prognostic factors of OS and CSS, the MET group had hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.51 and 0.57 for OS and CSS (p = 0.039 and 0.103), respectively, whereas the BOTH group had HRs of 0.51 and 0.60 for OS and CSS (p < 0.05), respectively; LR was taken as a reference. The 2-year OS and CSS rates from the date of nephrectomy and disease recurrence were 86.9% and 88.9% and 63.5% and 67.8%, respectively, for the LR group; 89.5% and 89.5% and 48.06% and 52.43%, respectively, for the MET group; and 96.8% and 96.8% and 86.6% and 82.6%, respectively, for the BOTH group. Only the LR and BOTH groups had significant differences in the 2-year OS and CSS rates (p < 0.05). In conclusion, our study showed that the LR group had worse survival prognoses than any other group in nephrectomized patients with nmRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Han Kim
- Department of Urology, Urologic Cancer Center, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Boram Park
- Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eu Chang Hwang
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Sung-Hoo Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seok Soo Byun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jinsoo Chung
- Department of Urology, Urologic Cancer Center, Research Institute and Hospital of National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sekiya K, Ito M, Takemura K, Suzuki H, Kobayashi S, Koga F. Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma diagnosed before an era of first-line immune-oncology combination therapies. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:1570-1576. [PMID: 34075403 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the prognostic role of the controlling nutritional status score in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received their diagnosis between 2007 and 2018 and were treated with or without a first-line interferon or tyrosine kinase inhibitor at a single cancer center. The controlling nutritional status score was based on values for albumin, lymphocyte count and total cholesterol at the metastatic renal cell carcinoma diagnosis. Association of the controlling nutritional status score and clinical variables, including the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk classifications, with overall survival was examined using the Cox proportional hazard model. Predictive accuracy of the prognostic factors was assessed using Harrell's concordance index. RESULTS First-line interferon and tyrosine kinase inhibitor were given to 48 (45%) and 41 (38%) patients, respectively, and 28 (26%) and 33 (31%) patients underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy and metastasectomy, respectively. During follow-up (median: 36.3 months), 64 patients died. The median controlling nutritional status score was 2 (range: 0-8). A controlling nutritional status score ≥ 2 was significantly associated with shorter overall survival (P < 0.01) independently of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk classifications. Integration of the controlling nutritional status score into the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk classifications improved concordance index from 0.702 to 0.770 and from 0.698 to 0.749, respectively. CONCLUSION The controlling nutritional status score may serve as a prognostic biomarker objectively reflecting the general physical condition of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with or without first-line interferon or tyrosine kinase inhibitor in terms of nutritional and immuno-inflammatory status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Sekiya
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masaya Ito
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Takemura
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuichiro Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Koga
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leite LDM, Bergerot PG, Dettino ALA, R JA, Zequi SDC, Formiga MNDC. Influence of treatment access on survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in brazilian cancer center. Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:566-573. [PMID: 33621005 PMCID: PMC7993945 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immunotherapy improved survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Disparities in treatment access are present in healthcare systems globally. The aim of this study was to analyze survival outcomes of mRCC patients treated with first-line TKIs in the public (PHS) and private (PrS) health system in a Brazilian Cancer Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records from all mRCC patients treated with first-line TKIs from 2007-2018 were reviewed retrospectively. Categorial variables were compared by Fisher's exact test. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Maier method and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors were adjusted by Cox regression model. RESULTS Of the 171 eligible patients, 37 (21.6%) were PHS patients and 134 (78.4%) were PrS patients. There were no difference in age, gender, or sites of metastasis. PHS patients had worse performance status (ECOG ≥2, 35.1% vs. 13.5%, p=0.007), poorer risk score (IMDC poor risk, 32.4% vs. 16.4%, p=0.09), and less nephrectomies (73% vs. 92.5%, p=0.003) than PrS patients. Median lines of therapy was one for PHS versus two for PrS patients (p=0.03). Median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 versus 26.5 months (p=0.002) and progression-free survival (PFS), 8.4 versus 11 months (p=0.01) for PHS and PrS patients, respectively. After adjusting for known prognostic factors on multivariate analysis, PHS patients still had a higher risk of death (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.01-2.56, p=0.047). CONCLUSION Patients with mRCC treated via the PHS had worse overall survival, possibly due to poorer prognosis at presentation and less drug access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana de M Leite
- Departamento de Oncologia Médica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Paulo G Bergerot
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Aldo L A Dettino
- Departamento de Oncologia Médica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - José Augusto R
- Departamento de Oncologia Médica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Stenio de C Zequi
- Departamento de Urologia Oncológica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Maria Nirvana da C Formiga
- Departamento de Oncologia Médica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.,Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Oncogenômica e Inovação Terapêutica, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim ES, Uldrick TS, Schenkel C, Bruinooge SS, Harvey RD, Magnuson A, Spira A, Wade JL, Stewart MD, Vega DM, Beaver JA, Denicoff AM, Ison G, Ivy SP, George S, Perez RP, Spears PA, Tap WD, Schilsky RL. Continuing to Broaden Eligibility Criteria to Make Clinical Trials More Representative and Inclusive: ASCO–Friends of Cancer Research Joint Research Statement. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:2394-2399. [DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
13
|
Nichani P, Popovic MM, Schlenker MB, Park J, Ahmed IIK. Microinvasive glaucoma surgery: A review of 3476 eyes. Surv Ophthalmol 2020; 66:714-742. [PMID: 32998003 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2020.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a potentially safer and more efficacious method studied in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma requiring less invasive treatment goals; however, the literature on MIGS must be thoroughly evaluated. We conducted a review of MIGS by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL. Primary efficacy indicators were reductions in intraocular pressure and topical medication use postoperatively. While all comparative randomized controlled trials assessing MIGS in English peer-reviewed journals were included, only observational studies with a target follow-up of at least one year and a high priority score were analyzed, resulting in a total of 3476 eyes across 20 trials. The mean age was 69.5 ± 2.9 years, 53.7% were female, and 77.4% were Caucasian. One study had last follow-up at less than one year, fifteen studies had follow-up extending 1-2 years, and four had longer than two years of follow-up. A pattern of more significant intraocular pressure and medication reduction was observed in patients who underwent MIGS (n = 2170) relative to control (n = 1306) interventions. iStent had the most literature supporting its efficacy, followed by Hydrus. The most common adverse events after MIGS implantation included stent obstruction, inflammation, and subsequent surgical intervention. Surgical complication rates and efficacy are favorable after MIGS. This review helps to consolidate the high-quality evidence that exists for various MIGS procedures and to identify gaps where further research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prem Nichani
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marko M Popovic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew B Schlenker
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kensington Eye Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeff Park
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Iqbal Ike K Ahmed
- Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Prism Eye Institute, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; Department of Ophthalmology, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dr Hall B, Abel EJ. The Evolving Role of Metastasectomy for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 2020; 47:379-388. [PMID: 32600539 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2020.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Surgical metastasectomy continues to be utilized for patients with solitary or low-volume metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Although few high-quality data are available to evaluate outcomes, local treatment is recommended when feasible because it may allow a subset of patients to delay or avoid systemic treatments. With the development of improved mRCC therapies, utilization of metastasectomy has increased because most patients have incomplete responses to systemic treatment of their metastases. This review discusses the rationale and history of metastasectomy, trends in utilization, prognostic factors for patient selection, site-specific considerations, alternatives for nonsurgical local treatment, and risk of morbidity associated with metastasectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan Dr Hall
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Edwin Jason Abel
- Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|