Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting pathologic complete response in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Use of axillary ultrasound to guide breast cancer management in the genomic assay era

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy is conventionally offered to non-stage IV breast cancer patients with metastatic nodes. However, the RxPONDER trial showed that chemotherapy can be omitted in selected patients with 1-3 metastatic nodes if the 21-gene assay recurrence score is ≤25. We aimed to investigate if axillary ultrasound can identify this group of patients with limited nodal burden so that they can undergo upfront surgery followed by gene assay testing, to potentially avoid chemotherapy.

METHODS

T1-3, node positive, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer patients ≥50 years old with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) were reviewed from 2 centres. Patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bilateral cancers were excluded. Number of ultrasound-detected abnormal axillary nodes, demographic and histological parameters were correlated with the number of metastatic nodes found on ALND.

RESULTS

138 patients were included, 59 (42.8%) and 79 (57.2%) patients had 1-3 and >3 metastatic nodes on ALND respectively. On logistic regression and ROC analysis, the number of ultrasound-detected abnormal nodes was significant (p < 0.001) for predicting limited nodal burden (ROC AUC = 0.7135). Probabilities of <4 metastatic nodes with ultrasound cut-offs of 5, 6 and 8 abnormal nodes were 0.057, 0.026 and 0.005 respectively, with 100% specificity.

CONCLUSION

A cut-off of ≤5 ultrasound-detected abnormal nodes can distinguish between patients with limited versus high nodal burden, with high specificity. Hence, incorporating the number of abnormal ultrasound-detected nodes into clinical practice may prove useful in guiding between upfront surgery and gene assay testing or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in this group of patients.

Innovations in Positron Emission Tomography and State of the Art in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Treatment Response

The advent of hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and PET/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners resulted in an increased clinical relevance of nuclear medicine in oncology. The use of [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) has also made it possible to study tumors (including breast cancer) from not only a dimensional perspective but also from a metabolic point of view. In particular, the use of [18F]FDG PET allowed early confirmation of the efficacy or failure of therapy. The purpose of this review was to assess the literature concerning the response to various therapies for different subtypes of breast cancer through PET. We start by summarizing studies that investigate the validation of PET/CT for the assessment of the response to therapy in breast cancer; then, we present studies that compare PET imaging (including PET devices dedicated to the breast) with CT and MRI, focusing on the identification of the most useful parameters obtainable from PET/CT. We also focus on novel non-FDG radiotracers, as they allow for the acquisition of information on specific aspects of the new therapies.

Metabolic Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer

Metabolic PET, most commonly 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/computed tomography (CT), has had a major impact on the imaging of breast cancer and can have important clinical applications in appropriate patients. While limited for screening, FDG PET/CT outperforms conventional imaging in locally advanced breast cancer. FDG PET/CT is more sensitive than conventional imaging in assessing treatment response, accurately predicting complete response or nonresponse in early-stage cases. It also aids in determining disease extent and treatment response in the metastatic setting. Further research, including randomized controlled trials with FDG and other metabolic agents such as fluciclovine, is needed for optimal breast cancer imaging.

Development and External Validation of 18F-FDG PET-Based Radiomic Model for Predicting Pathologic Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

The aim of our retrospective study is to develop and externally validate an 18F-FDG PET-derived radiomics model for predicting pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. A total of 87 breast cancer patients underwent curative surgery after NAC at Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital and were randomly assigned to a training cohort and an internal validation cohort. Radiomic features were extracted from pretreatment PET images. A radiomic-score model was generated using the LASSO method. A combination model incorporating significant clinical variables was constructed. These models were externally validated in a separate cohort of 28 patients from Soonchunhyang University Buscheon Hospital. The model performances were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC). Seven radiomic features were selected to calculate the radiomic-score. Among clinical variables, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status was an independent predictor of pCR. The radiomic-score model achieved good discriminability, with AUCs of 0.963, 0.731, and 0.729 for the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. The combination model showed improved predictive performance compared to the radiomic-score model alone, with AUCs of 0.993, 0.772, and 0.906 in three cohorts, respectively. The 18F-FDG PET-derived radiomic-based model is useful for predicting pCR after NAC in breast cancer.

Molecular imaging as biomarker for treatment response and outcome in breast cancer

Molecular imaging, such as positron emission tomography (PET), is increasingly used as biomarker to predict and assess treatment response in breast cancer. The number of biomarkers is expanding with specific tracers for tumour characteristics throughout the body and this information can be used to aid the decision-making process. These measurements include metabolic activity using [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET ([18F]FDG-PET), oestrogen receptor (ER) expression using 16α-[18F]Fluoro-17β-oestradiol ([18F]FES)-PET and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression using PET with radiolabelled trastuzumab (HER2-PET). In early breast cancer, baseline [18F]FDG-PET is frequently used for staging, but limited subtype-specific data reduce its usefulness as biomarker for treatment response or outcome. Early metabolic change on serial [18F]FDG-PET is increasingly used in the neo-adjuvant setting as dynamic biomarker to predict pathological complete response to systemic therapy, potentially allowing de-intensification or step-up intensification of treatment. In the metastatic setting, baseline [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]FES-PET can be used as biomarker to predict treatment response, in triple-negative and ER-positive breast cancer, respectively. Metabolic progression on repeated [18F]FDG-PET appears to precede progressive disease on standard evaluation imaging; however, subtype-specific studies are limited and more prospective data are needed before implementation in clinical practice. Even though (repeated) [18F]FDG-PET, [18F]FES-PET and HER2-PEt all show promising results as biomarkers to predict therapy response and outcome, for eventual integration into clinical practice, future studies will have to clarify at what timepoint this integration has to optimally take place.

Image quality evaluation of real low-dose breast PET

Purpose

To evaluate the clinical feasibility of high-resolution dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET) with real low-dose ¹⁸F-2-fluorodeoxy-d-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) by comparing images acquired with full-dose FDG.

Materials and methods

Nine women with no history of breast cancer and previously scanned by dbPET injected with a clinical ¹⁸F-FDG dose (3 MBq/kg) were enrolled. They were injected with 50% of the clinical ¹⁸F-FDG dose and scanned with dbPET for 10 min for each breast 60 and 90 min after injection. To investigate the effect of the scan start time and acquisition time on image quality, list-mode data were divided into 1, 3, 5, and 7 min (and 10 min with 50% FDG injected) from the start of acquisition and reconstructed. The reconstructed images were visually and quantitatively compared for contrast between mammary gland and fat (contrast) and for coefficient of variation (CV) in the mammary gland.

Results

In visual evaluation, the contrast between the mammary gland and fat acquired at a 50% dose for 7 min was comparable and even better in smoothness than that in the images acquired at a 100% dose. No visual difference between the images with a 50% dose was found with scan start times 60 and 90 min after injection. Quantitative evaluation showed a slightly lower contrast in the image at 60 min after 50% dosing, with no difference between acquisition times. There was no difference in CV between conditions; however, smoothness decreased with shorter acquisition time in all conditions.

Conclusions

The quality of dbPET images with a 50% FDG dose was high enough for clinical application. Although the optimal scan start time for improved lesion-to-background mammary gland contrast remained unknown in this study, it will be clarified in future studies of breast cancer patients.

FDG PET/CT for Detection of Infectious Complications Following Solid Organ Transplantation

Infectious complications after solid organ transplantation (SOT) are often more severe and remain a diagnostic challenge due to vague and atypical clinical presentations. Diagnostic performance of conventional diagnostic tools is frequently inadequate which may lead to delayed diagnosis with the risk of poorer outcomes. This literature review aimed to investigate the current evidence on the use of ¹⁸F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/computer tomography (CT) in infectious complications after SOT. Based on search in PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, 13 articles and 46 case reports were included. For inclusion, articles were to include data on patients with infectious complications after SOT, and where FDG PET/CT was part of the work-up. Final searches were conducted on 02 September 2020. Overall, in the absence of initial diagnostic clues, FDG PET/CT should be considered as the imaging technique of choice as it may guide further investigations and eventually reveal the diagnosis in most of the patients. However, the available literature of the role of FDG PET/CT in SOT recipients with infectious complications is scarce and well-designed prospective studies including control groups are warranted to establish the role of FDG PET/C/ in SOT recipients. The main drawback of FDG PET/CT is the lack of ability to differentiate between cancer and infectious diseases which are both highly prevalent in this patient group. Accordingly, the main reasons for "false" results of FDG PET/CT is the misdiagnosis of cancer in benign inflammatory or infectious processes, information which nonetheless can be useful.