The protocol of a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled phase III study evaluating different cycles of oxaliplatin combined with S-1 (SOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: RESONANCE-II trial

Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy vs . chemotherapy alone in HER2(-) locally advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare the efficacy between neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy vs . chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant triplet vs . doublet chemotherapeutic regimens in locally advanced gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer (LAGC).

METHODS

We included LAGC patients from 47 hospitals in China's National Cancer Information Database (NCID) from January 2019 to December 2022. Using propensity score matching (PSM), we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy between neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy vs . chemotherapy alone, and neoadjuvant triplet vs . doublet chemotherapeutic regimens. The primary study result was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The secondary study results were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 1205 LAGC patients were included. After PSM, the ICIs plus chemotherapy and the chemotherapy cohorts had 184 patients each, while the doublet and triplet chemotherapy cohorts had 246 patients each. The pCR rate (14.13% vs . 7.61%, χ2 = 4.039, P = 0.044), and the 2-year (77.60% vs . 61.02%, HR = 0.67, 95% con-fidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.98, P = 0.048) and 3-year (70.55% vs . 61.02%, HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.32-0.93, P = 0.048) DFS rates in the ICIs plus chemotherapy cohort were improved compared to those in the chemotherapy cohort. No significant increase was observed in the OS rates at both 1 year and 2 years. The pCR rates, DFS rates at 1-3 years, and OS rates at 1-2 years did not differ significantly between the doublet and triplet cohorts, respectively. No differences were observed in postoperative complications between any of the group comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy improved the pCR rate and 2-3 years DFS rates of LAGC compared to chemotherapy alone, but whether short-term benefit could translate into long-term efficacy is unclear. The triplet regimen was not superior to the doublet regimen in terms of efficacy. The safety after surgery was similar between either ICIs plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy or the triplet and the doublet regimen.

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict pathological complete response in patients with locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with PD-1 antibodies

Background

Currently, the survival benefits of combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy with programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibody immunotherapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma remain controversial. Emerging evidence suggests that the survival benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma hinge upon the attainment of pathological complete response (pCR). Therefore, the prediction of pCR in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 antibody immunotherapy holds significant importance and is beneficial for the individualized treatment of gastric cancer (GC) patients.

Methods

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with GC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor (camrelizumab) therapy and radical gastrectomy between January 2019 and December 2020 at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 52 patients were enrolled in the study, with all subjects assigned to the training set. The neoadjuvant regimen consisted of a combination of PD-1 inhibitor and fluorouracil analogues plus oxaliplatin, comprising two drugs. The patients were divided into a pCR group and a non-pCR group according to pCR occurrence. Multifactor logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the correlation between each factor and pCR. A prediction model was developed based on the results of the logistic regression analysis. The predictive performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curves. Internal verification was completed via the bootstrapping method.

Results

The pCR was observed in 10 out of 52 patients (19.2%). The results of binary logistic regression multivariate analysis showed that cN stage [odds ratio (OR): 0.215; P=0.03], combined positive score (CPS) (OR: 6.364; P=0.026), and tumor diameter (OR: 0.112; P=0.026) were independent predictors of pCR. The nomogram prediction model for the pCR was plotted with a concordance index of 0.923 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8441-1].

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 antibodies may be the preferred option for patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who have a small tumor diameter, no or few lymph node metastases, and high CPS. The presented nomogram model exhibits the potential to predict pCR in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients, showcasing satisfactory predictive performance and potentially facilitating the implementation of personalized treatment strategies.

Perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers: a review of current approaches and future perspectives

Metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers have been treated with chemotherapy, but the landscape of cancer treatment is rapidly shifting towards immune-based therapies. As established by the CheckMate 649 and ATTRACTION-4 trials, combination therapy with fluorouracil, platinum, and nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, is now recognized as the standard first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. The potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors extends beyond metastatic disease. For locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer, perioperative chemotherapy with gastrectomy has been regarded as the standard of care, especially in Western nations. Besides, the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors as neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments is currently underway, indicating a significant paradigm shift in the treatment strategies. This review summarizes the clinical developments and future perspectives of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy with or without chemotherapy as perioperative treatment for gastric, esophageal, and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Perioperative chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly used in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but the clinical safety and efficacy are still controversial. This study aims to compare perioperative chemotherapy (PEC) with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for resectable LAGC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy for resectable LAGC were retrospectively reviewed, and divided into NSA group (NAC plus surgery and AC) and SA group (surgery followed by AC). The baseline characteristics and perioperative data were compared. Survival analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analyses for prognostic factors were based on the Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 450 patients were eligible for this study. 218 patients received NAC plus surgery and AC, while 232 upfront surgery followed by AC. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. NSA group showed significant superiority in R0 resection rate (P = 0.014), excised tumor size (P = 0.038), and tumor downstage (all P < 0.001). NAC did not affect postoperative complications or AC-related grade 3/4 adverse events. Patients in NSA group achieved significantly longer OS (P = 0.021) and DFS (P = 0.002). The Cox regression model showed that NAC was independently associated with better OS (HR 0.245, P = 0.039) and DFS (HR 0.591, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with SA, the administration of NSA was considered safe and feasible for achieving higher R0 resection rate without increasing the postoperative complications or AC-related grade 3/4 adverse events, and NAC was independently associated with better OS and DFS for resectable LAGC.

Is Pathologic Complete Response a Good Predictor for the Long-Term, Clinical Outcome in Patients with Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy? A Retrospective, Multi-institution Study in China

BACKGROUND

Many studies have used pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) as the primary endpoint for the short-term efficacy in gastric cancer, but whether it is a good indicator for overall survival is poorly understood.

METHODS

This study reviewed a multi-institution database of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy and achieved pCR after NAC. Cox regression models were used to identify clinicopathologic predictors of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Survival curves were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by means of the log-rank test.

RESULTS

OS and DFS in patients with pCR were significantly higher than in those with non-pCR (both P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed pCR was an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS (P = 0.009 and P = 0.002 for OS and DFS, respectively). However, the survival benefit for pCR was present only for ypN0 tumors (P = 0.004 and P = 0.001 for OS and DFS, respectively), and OS (P = 0.292) and DFS (P = 0.285) among patients with ypN+ gastric cancer could not be stratified by pCR.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, pCR is an independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS, but the survival benefit for pCR is present only for ypN0 tumors but not ypN+ tumors.

Long-term survival outcome of locally advanced gastric cancer patients who achieved a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcome of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) who achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) was scarcely discussed, and never had the factors affecting the prognosis of pCR patients been investigated.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who achieved a pCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in Jinling Hospital. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Meanwhile, univariate and multivariate COX regression analysis was applied to identify prognostic factors affecting patients' survival.

RESULTS

A total of 37 consecutive LAGC patients with pCR were included. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 88.8% and 78.6%, and the 3- and 5-year PFS rates were 86.5% and 75.8%. In the multivariate COX model, NAC duration of more than 3 cycles (HR 0.11 [0.02-0.62], P = 0.013) and poorly differentiated tumor at diagnosis (HR 0.17 [0.03-0.95], P = 0.043) were detected as protective factors for patients OS. Whereas for PFS, NAC duration (HR 0.12 [0.02-0.67], P = 0.015) was the only protective factor confirmed, with tumor differentiation at diagnosis exhibiting marginal significance (HR 0.21 [0.04-1.09], P = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LAGC who achieved a pCR displayed favorable long-term survival outcome, especially those with adequate cycles (≥ 3) of NAC. Besides, poor differentiation at diagnosis might also predict the better OS when pCR achieved.

Comparisons of perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: an updated pooled analysis of eighteen studies

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in advanced gastric cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy represent a controversial issue. We performed an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) versus conventional open gastrectomy (OG) in this subset of patients.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were comprehensively searched up to May 2023. The short-term and long-term outcomes of LG versus OG in advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy were evaluated. Effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals were always assessed using random-effects model. The prospective protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359126).

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 16 cohort studies) involving 2096 patients were included. In total, 933 patients were treated with LG and 1163 patients were treated with OG. In perioperative outcomes, LG was associated with less estimated blood loss (MD = - 65.15; P < 0.0001), faster time to flatus (MD = - 0.56; P < 0.0001) and liquid intake (MD = - 0.42; P = 0.02), reduced hospital stay (MD = - 2.26; P < 0.0001), lower overall complication rate (OR = 0.70; P = 0.002) and lower minor complication rate (OR = 0.69; P = 0.006), while longer operative time (MD = 25.98; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of proximal margin, distal margin, R1/R2 resection rate, retrieved lymph nodes, time to remove gastric tube and drainage tube, major complications and other specific complications. In survival outcomes, LG and OG were not significantly different in overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSION

LG can be a safe and feasible technique for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to further validate the results of our study.

Comparison of the predictive value of pathological response at primary tumor and lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemotherapy has been increasingly used in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). However, the prognostic factors are still insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of pathological response of the primary tumor to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the lymph node status after NACT.

METHODS

Data from 160 patients with LAGC treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy and met the inclusion criteria between March 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Pathological evaluation after NACT was based on the grade of pathological response of the primary tumor and the status of lymph node. Survival curves for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival difference. Univariate and multivariate analyses for prognostic factors were based on the Cox regression.

RESULTS

Among 160 selected cases, 90 had pathological response (PR), while 70 had no pathological response (nPR) to NACT. Smaller tumor size was presented in PR group, which also had lower level of signet ring cell features, compared to nPR group (all p < 0.05). Based on the status of lymph nodes, nodal status (-) group showed smaller tumor size, lower depth of tumor invasion, better differentiated degree, lower level of signet ring cell features, lower rate of lymphatic and venous invasion and less advanced ypTNM stage (all p < 0.05). Survival was equivalent between PR and nPR group (all p > 0.05), while patients with no lymph node metastasis had better DFS than that with lymph node metastasis (HR 0.301, 95% CI 0.194-0.468, p = 0.002). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified that lymph node status after NACT was an independent prognostic factor associated with survival (OS: hazard ratio 1.756, 95% CI 1.114-3.278, p = 0.029; DFS: hazard ratio 1.901, 95% CI 1.331-3.093, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Lymph node status is a potential independent prognostic factor for LAGC patients treated with NACT and may be more efficient than pathological response in primary tumor.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of PSOX, DOF and SOX regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

Aim: To explore the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel+oxaliplatin+S-1 (PSOX), docetaxel+oxaliplatin+fluorouracil (DOF) and oxaliplatin+S-1 (SOX) regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (GC). Methods: A retrospective analysis was used in 306 patients with GC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, consisting of 102 from the PSOX group, 100 from the DOF group and 104 from the SOX group. Results: The total effective rates and disease control rates for the PSOX, DOF and SOX groups were 31.4, 18 and 16.3% and 96.1, 94 and 92.3%, respectively. The highest total effective rate and disease control rate were found in the PSOX groups. Moreover, no difference among the PSOX, DOF and SOX groups on the incidence of adverse events was observed (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The PSOX regimen is an alternative neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for GC patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes following neoadjuvant therapy in upfront resectable gastric cancers compared to surgery alone in phase III randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common malignancy and the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality globally. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in upfront resectable gastric cancer is a subject of ongoing research. In recent meta-analyses, R0 resection rate and superior outcomes were not consistently observed in such regimens.

AIM

To describe the outcomes following phase III randomised control trials; comparing neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery against upfront surgery with and without adjuvant therapy in resectable gastric cancers.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science was searched from January 2002 to September 2022.

RESULTS

13 studies were included (3280 participants). R0 resection rates were in neoadjuvant therapy arms as compared to adjuvant therapy with odds ratio (OR) 1.55[95% CI: 1.13, 2.13](p=0.007) and compared to surgery alone OR 2.49[95% CI: 1.56, 3.96](p=0.0001). 3-year and 5-year progression-, event- and disease-free survival in neoadjuvant therapy as compared to adjuvant therapy were not significantly increased, 3-year OR 0.87[0.71, 1.07](p=0.19). Meanwhile, comparing neoadjuvant therapy to adjuvant therapy, 3-year overall survival (OS) hazard ratio was 0.88[95% CI: 0.70, 1.11](p=0.71) while 3- and 5-year OS OR was 1.18[95% CI: 0.90, 1.55], p=0.22 and 1.27[95% CI: 0.67, 2.42](p=0.47) respectively. Surgical complications were also more common with neoadjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant therapy yields higher rates of R0 resection. However, improved long-term survival was not seen as compared to adjuvant therapy. Large multi-centred randomised control trials with D2 lymphadenectomy should be performed to better evaluate the treatment modalities.

The optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (LAGC) has been recommended in several guidelines. However, there is no global consensus about the optimum of NAC regimens. We aimed to determine the optimal NAC regimen for LAGC.

Methods

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. The literature search was conducted from inception to June 2022. The odds ratio (OR) value and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for assessment of R0 resection rate and pathological complete response rate (pCR) as primary outcomes. The hazard ratio (HR) value and 95% CI were interpreted for the assessment of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as second outcomes. The risk ratio (RR) value and 95% CI were used for safety assessment.

Results

Twelve randomized controlled trials were identified with 3846 eligible participants. The network plots for R0 resectability, OS, and DFS constituted closed loops. The regimens of TPF (taxane and platinum plus fluoropyrimidine), ECF (epirubicin and cisplatin plus fluorouracil), and PF (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine) showed a meaningful improvement of R0 resectability, as well as OS and/or DFS, compared with surgery (including surgery-alone and surgery plus postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy). Importantly, among these regimens, TPF regimen showed significant superiority in R0 resection rate (versus ECF regimen), OS (versus ECF regimen), DFS (versus PF and ECF regimens), and pCR (versus PF regimen).

Conclusions

The taxane-based triplet regimen of TPF is likely the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for LAGC patients.

Signaling pathways and therapeutic interventions in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fifth in global cancer diagnosis and fourth in cancer-related death. Despite tremendous progress in diagnosis and therapeutic strategies and significant improvements in patient survival, the low malignancy stage is relatively asymptomatic and many GC cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, which leads to unsatisfactory prognosis and high recurrence rates. With the recent advances in genome analysis, biomarkers have been identified that have clinical importance for GC diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Modern molecular classifications have uncovered the vital roles that signaling pathways, including EGFR/HER2, p53, PI3K, immune checkpoint pathways, and cell adhesion signaling molecules, play in GC tumorigenesis, progression, metastasis, and therapeutic responsiveness. These biomarkers and molecular classifications open the way for more precise diagnoses and treatments for GC patients. Nevertheless, the relative significance, temporal activation, interaction with GC risk factors, and crosstalk between these signaling pathways in GC are not well understood. Here, we review the regulatory roles of signaling pathways in GC potential biomarkers, and therapeutic targets with an emphasis on recent discoveries. Current therapies, including signaling-based and immunotherapies exploited in the past decade, and the development of treatment for GC, particularly the challenges in developing precision medications, are discussed. These advances provide a direction for the integration of clinical, molecular, and genomic profiles to improve GC diagnosis and treatments.

Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial

Background

Gastric cancer ranks high in terms of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Multimodal therapy is therefore essential for locally advanced gastric cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated that both perioperative chemotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can improve the prognosis of patients. However, the completion rate of chemotherapy after surgery remains low, which may affect survival. Thus, identifying the best way to combine radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery is important. The aim of this study was to explore the toxicity and efficacy of the total neoadjuvant therapy modality for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

This study will be a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, phase II clinical trial. Patients diagnosed with locally advanced (stage cT3-4 and cN positive, AJCC 8th) gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma will be enrolled. Patients will initially receive radiotherapy (95% planned target volume: 45 Gy/25 f) and concurrent chemotherapy (S-1: 40–60 mg twice a day) followed by six cycles of consolidated chemotherapy (SOX, consisting of S-1 and oxaliplatin) and surgery. The primary objective will assess pathological complete response; the secondary objectives will include toxicities assessing surgical complications, the tumor downstaging rate and the R0 resection rate.

Discussion

Investigation of total neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer is limited. The goal of this trial is to explore the efficacy and toxicity of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04062058, August 20, 2019).

Apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients: a prospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Apatinib, a small molecule targeting VEGFR2, is commonly used for advanced gastric cancer treatment. This prospective cohort study further investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Ninety-six locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients were divided into the apatinib plus chemotherapy group (N = 45) and chemotherapy group (N = 51) according to their chosen treatment. Apatinib was administered (375 mg/day), and S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (CapOx) was given as chemotherapy, for 3 cycles with 3 weeks a cycle before surgery.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (62.2% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.015) and pathological response grade (P = 0.011) were better; meanwhile, the tumor-resection rate (95.6% vs. 84.3%, P = 0.143) and pathological complete response rate (23.3% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.080) exhibited increasing trends (without statistical significance) in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy group. Additionally, the apatinib plus chemotherapy group achieved prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.019) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.047) compared with the chemotherapy group. After adjusted by multivariate Cox's regression analysis, neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy was still superior to chemotherapy regarding DFS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.277, P = 0.014) and OS (HR: 0.316, P = 0.038). Notably, the incidences of adverse events between the two groups were not different (P > 0.050). Moreover, the most common adverse events of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy were leukopenia (42.2%), fatigue (37.8%), hypertension (37.8%), and anemia (31.1%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy realizes better clinical response, pathological response, survival profile, and non-inferior safety profile compared to chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma.

Short and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) combined with surgery is regarded as an effective treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Laparoscopic surgery represents the mainstream of minimally invasive surgery. Currently, surgeons focus more on surgical safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy after NACT. Thus, we sought to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) and open total gastrectomy (OTG) after NACT.

AIM

To compare the short and long-term outcomes between LTG and OTG for AGC after NACT.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinicopathological data of 136 patients who accepted gastrectomy after NACT from June 2012 to June 2019, including 61 patients who underwent LTG and 75 who underwent OTG. Clinicopathological characteristics between the LTG and OTG groups showed no significant difference. SPSS 26.0, R software, and GraphPad PRISM 8.0 were used to perform statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 136 patients included, eight acquired pathological complete response, and the objective response rate was 47.8% (65/136). The LTG group had longer operation time (P = 0.015), less blood loss (P = 0.003), shorter days to first flatus (P < 0.001), and shorter postoperative hospitalization days (P < 0.001). LTG spent more surgical cost than OTG (P < 0.001), while total hospitalized cost of LTG was less than OTG (P < 0.001). 21 (28.0%) patients in the OTG group and 14 (23.0%) in the LTG group had 30-d postoperative complications, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.503). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 60.6% and 64.6% in the LTG and OTG groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.859, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.522-1.412, P = 0.546], while the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 54.5% and 51.8% in the LTG and OTG group, respectively (HR = 0.947, 95%CI: 0.582-1.539, P = 0.823). Multivariate cox analysis showed that body mass index and pTNM stage were independent risk factors for OS while vascular invasion and pTNM stage were independent risk factors for DFS (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

After NACT, LTG shows comparable 30-d postoperative morbidity as well as 3-year OS and DFS rate to OTG. We recommend that experienced surgeons select LTG other than OTG for proper AGC patients after NACT.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Undergoing Perioperative or Postoperative Adjuvant S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin With D2 Gastrectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

Background

Some high-quality clinical trials have proven the efficacy and safety of perioperative and postoperative S-1 with oxaliplatin (peri-SOX and post-SOX) for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) undergoing D2 gastrectomy. However, little is known about how health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes over time in patients receiving peri-SOX or post-SOX chemotherapy.

Methods

A prospective observational cohort (NCT04408859) identified 151 eligible patients with LAGC who underwent D2 gastrectomy with at least six cycles of peri-SOX or post-SOX chemotherapy from 2018 to 2020. HRQOL was assessed using the EROTC QLQ-C30 and its gastric module, QLQ-STO22, at indicated measurements, including the baseline, 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month after initiation of therapy. Baseline characteristics, therapeutic effects, and longitudinal HRQOL were compared between the peri-SOX and post-SOX groups after propensity score matching. HRQOL changes over time and the risk factors for scales with severe deterioration were further analyzed.

Results

No statistically significant differences in longitudinal HRQOL were observed between patients in the peri-SOX and post-SOX groups, with comparable surgical outcomes and adverse chemotherapy events. Scales of social functioning, abnormal taste, and anxiety improved earlier in the peri-SOX group than in the post-SOX group. Score changes in both groups indicated that general deterioration and slower recovery usually occurred in the scales of physical, social, and role functioning, as well as symptoms of fatigue, reflux, diarrhea, and anxiety.

Conclusion

Peri-SOX showed a longitudinal HRQOL comparable to post-SOX in patients with LAGC who underwent D2 gastrectomy. The peri-SOX group had better performance in social functioning, abnormal taste, and anxiety at some measurements.

Duration of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A "Less Is More" Question When ypN0 Is Achieved

Backgrounds

Perioperative chemotherapy (PEC) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have become a vital part of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) treatment, but the optimal duration of PEC has not been studied. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the possibility of duration reduction in PEC in the adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) phase for ypN0 patients.

Methods

We included LAGC patients who achieved ypN0 after NAC in our institution from 2005 to 2018. The risk/benefit of AC and other covariates were majorly measured by overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). We developed a survival-tree-based model to determine the optimal PEC duration for ypN0 patients in different classes.

Results

A total of 267 R0 resection patients were included. There were 55 patients who did not receive AC. The 5-year OS was 74.34% in the non-AC group and 83.64% in the AC group with a significant difference (p = 0.012). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that both AC (AC vs. non-AC: HR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.27–0.88; p = 0.018) and ypT stages (ypT3-4 vs. ypT0-2: HR, 2.00; 95%CI, 1.11–3.59; p = 0.021) were significant protective/risk factors on patients OS and PFS. A decision tree model for OS indicated an optimal four to six cycles of PEC, which was recommended for ypT0-2N0 patients, while a minimum of five PEC cycles was recommended for ypT3-4N0 patients.

Conclusion

AC treatment is still necessary for ypN0. The duration reduction could be applied for the ypT0-2N0 stage patients but may not be suitable for higher ypT stages and beyond. A multicenter-based study is required.

Efficacy of Xiang-Sha-Liu-Jun-Zi on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cancer is the main cause of death worldwide, and chemotherapy is the basic method of treating cancer. However, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is the most common side effect of chemotherapy, and conventional antiemetics for the treatment of CINV also have side effects. At present, a large number of randomized controlled trials have shown that Xiang-Sha-Liu-Jun-Zi (XSLJZ) can effectively treat CINV, but there is no systematic review. Therefore, this systematic review aims to discuss the effectiveness of XSLJZ in the treatment of CINV.

METHODS

Search for relevant documents in the Chinese and English databases, and the search time is limited to March 2021. Databases include Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chongqing VIP Information Resource Integration Service Platform, Wanfang Data, Chinese Biomedical Literature, etc. We will search the international clinical trial registration platform and the Chinese clinical trial registration platform to find ongoing and unpublished clinical trials. Randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of XSLJZ in the treatment of CINV were collected. After screening the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers independently extracted the data. The effective rate of treatment is the main outcome indicator of this study. The secondary indicators of this study include the incidence of adverse reactions and the improvement rate of quality of life. RevMan 5.3.5 software was used for statistical analysis. Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system will be used to evaluate the quality evidence for each outcome.

RESULTS

This study will provide the latest evidence for the treatment of CINV by XSLJZ.

CONCLUSION

: To evaluate the efficacy of XSLJZ in the treatment of CINV.

UNIQUE INPLASY NUMBER

INPLASY202140079.

Current status and future perspectives on neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer, with high morbidity and mortality rates, is one of the most heterogeneous tumors. Radical gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy are the standard treatments. However, the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) need to be confirmed by many trials before implementation, creating a bottleneck in development. Although clinical benefits of NAT have been observed, a series of problems remain to be solved. Before therapy, more contributing factors should be offered for choice in the intended population and ideal regimens. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) scanning is usually applied to evaluate effectiveness according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), yet CT scanning results sometimes differ from pathological responses. After NAT, the appropriate time for surgery is still empirically defined. Our review aims to discuss the abovementioned issues regarding NAT for GC, including indications, selection of regimens, lesion assessment and NAT-surgery interval time.