Checkpoint inhibition in combination with an immunoboost of external beam radiotherapy in solid tumors (CHEERS): study protocol for a phase 2, open-label, randomized controlled trial

The dynamic duo: A narrative review on the synergy between stereotactic body radiotherapy and immunotherapy in lung cancer treatment (Review)

Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is undoubtedly one of the major breakthroughs in lung cancer research. Patient survival and prognosis have all been improved as a result, although numerous patients do not respond to immunotherapy due to various immune escape mechanisms of the tumor cells. Recent preclinical and clinical evidence has shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), also known as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy, has a prominent immune priming effect that could elicit antitumor immunity against specific tumor antigens and destroy distant tumor cells, thereby achieving the elusive abscopal effect, with the resulting immuno‑active tumor environment also being more conducive to ICIs. Some landmark trials have already demonstrated the survival benefit of the dynamic duo of SBRT plus immunotherapy in metastatic non‑small‑cell lung cancer, while others such as PEMBRO‑RT further suggest that the addition of SBRT to immunotherapy could expand the current indication to those who have historically responded poorly to ICIs. In the present review, the biological mechanisms that drive the synergistic effect of SBRT and immunotherapy were first briefly outlined; then, the current understanding from clinical trials was summarized and new insight into the evolving role of immunotherapy and SBRT synergy in lung cancer treatment was provided. Finally, novel avenues for discovery were highlighted. The innovation of the present review lies in the inclusion of non‑ICI immunotherapy in the discussion, which provides a more comprehensive view on the current development and future trend of SBRT + immunotherapy synergy.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: The CHEERS Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 have improved the outcome for many cancer types, the majority of patients fails to respond to ICI monotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of ICIs.

Objective

To assess the addition of radiotherapy to ICIs compared with ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial was conducted in 5 Belgian hospitals and enrolled participants between March 2018 and October 2020. Patients 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung carcinoma were eligible. A total of 99 patients were randomly assigned to either the control arm (n = 52) or the experimental arm (n = 47). Of those, 3 patients (1 in the control arm vs 2 in the experimental arm) withdrew consent and thus were not included in the analysis. Data analyses were performed between April 2022 and March 2023.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive anti-PD-1/PD-1 ligand 1 ICIs alone as per standard of care (control arm) or combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy 3 × 8 gray to a maximum of 3 lesions prior to the second or third ICI cycle, depending on the frequency of administration (experimental arm). Randomization was stratified according to tumor histologic findings and disease burden (3 and fewer or more than 3 cancer lesions).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as per immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Key secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, local control rate, and toxic effects. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, while safety was evaluated in the as-treated population.

Results

Among 96 patients included in the analysis (mean age, 66 years; 76 [79%] female), 72 (75%) had more than 3 tumor lesions and 65 (68%) had received at least 1 previous line of systemic treatment at time of inclusion. Seven patients allocated to the experimental arm did not complete the study-prescribed radiotherapy course due to early disease progression (n = 5) or intercurrent illness (n = 2). With a median (range) follow-up of 12.5 (0.7-46.2) months, median PFS was 2.8 months in the control arm compared with 4.4 months in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.58-1.53; P = .82). Between the control and experimental arms, no improvement in median OS was observed (11.0 vs 14.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48-1.41; P = .47), and objective response rate was not statistically significantly different (22% vs 27%; P = .56), despite a local control rate of 75% in irradiated patients. Acute treatment-related toxic effects of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 79% and 18% of patients in the control arm vs 78% and 18% in the experimental arm, respectively. No grade 5 adverse events occurred.

Conclusions and Relevance

This phase 2 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that while safe, adding subablative stereotactic radiotherapy of a limited number of metastatic lesions to ICI monotherapy failed to show improvement in PFS or OS.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03511391.

Beyond the Knife in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review-To Ablate or Not to Ablate?

Intensified systemic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has led to improved patient outcomes. Patients commonly require local control of one or a few metastases. The aim was to evaluate metastasis-directed ablative therapies in extracranial mRCC. Two databases and one registry were searched, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach, for all prospective and matched-pair case-control mRCC studies of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryotherapy, microwave ablation (MWA), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Eighteen studies were identified. Fourteen investigated SBRT in 424 patients. Four thermal ablation studies were identified: two cryotherapy (56 patients) and two RFA studies (90 patients). The median participant number was 30 (range 12-69). The combined median follow-up was 17.3 months (range 8-52). Four SBRT studies reported local control (LC) at 12 months, median 84.4% (range 82.5-93). Seven studies (six SBRT and one cryotherapy) reported an LC rate of median 87% (79-100%). Median overall survival (OS) was reported in eight studies (five SBRT, two cryotherapy, and one RFA) with a median of 22.7 months (range 6.7-not reached). Median progression-free survival was reported in seven studies (five SBRT, one cryotherapy, and one RFA); the median was 9.3 months (range 3.0-22.7 months). Grade ≥ 3 toxicity ranged from 1.7% to 10%. SBRT has excellent local control outcomes and acceptable toxicity. Only four eligible thermal ablative studies were identified and could not be compared with SBRT. Translationally rich definitive studies are warranted.

Radiotherapy Use in Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Review of the Guidelines and Impact of Increased Awareness in Patient Referral at a Tertiary Center in Belgium

Purpose

Pronounced underuse of radiotherapy (RT) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is reported. This study aims to assess the awareness about the role of RT in different MIBC settings and see whether this has increased since 2017.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed the bladder cancer guidelines of the EAU, ESMO, NCCN, NICE, and AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO, focusing on the role of RT in MIBC. In 2017, we evaluated the use of RT in MIBC in Belgium. This raised awareness about the indications of RT in different MIBC settings. Here, we present a retrospective pattern of care analysis of the RT use for MIBC patients at our center from January 2012 until December 2021. Frequency of RT use, patient, disease and treatment characteristics were compared between two 5-year periods (2012-2016 and 2017-2021).

Results

Review of the guidelines suggested that RT can be used as a treatment option in most MIBC settings. However, differences between guideline recommendations existed and high-level evidence was often lacking. Overall, 221 unique MIBC patients received RT at our center. RT use for MIBC was 39% higher in the second 5-year period (Between the same periods, the number of new MIBC registrations increased with 26%). The most pronounced increase, ie, 529%, was observed in the primary setting and was in parallel with patient preference becoming the main indication for RT. Participation in clinical trials seems to have had an important impact on the frequency of RT use in the adjuvant and metastatic setting.

Conclusion

We provide a critical overview of the RT indications in MIBC as recommended by the international guidelines. Increased awareness about RT as a treatment option in MIBC seems to have an impact on the treatment choice in clinical practice, as was observed in our tertiary center.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Kidney Cancer: Ready for Prime Time?

The standard treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is surgery. However, a number of patients will not be candidates for surgical treatment or will reject this therapeutic approach. Therefore, alternative approaches are required. Historically, radiotherapy has been considered an ineffective treatment for RCC due to the radioresistance of renal tumour cells to conventional fractionation and the increased rate of toxicity. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a radiotherapy technique that provides a non-invasive ablative treatment with remarkable rates of local control in both primary tumours and metastases in several locations, with a low associated morbidity due to the highly conformal dose and the use of image-guided techniques. Current evidence shows that a higher dose per fraction, achieving a higher biological effective dose, can overcome the radioresistance of RCC cells. Therefore, SBRT, as well as the combination of SBRT and new emerging immune therapies, has a potential role in the local treatment of primary RCC and oligometastatic RCC patients.

Oligoprogression in non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of lung cancers and is the most common non-cutaneous cancer world-wide. In NSCLC, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease (OPD) have been recognized as separate entities within the realm of metastatic disease and are emerging concepts in the context of targeted systemic therapies. Our objectives are to discuss the current literature regarding the evolving definitions of OPD in the context of oligometastatic disease (OMD) for NSCLC. Further, to discuss current and future clinical trials that have shaped our local approach with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)/stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

Methods

Literature on OPD in NSCLC and local ablative therapy (LAT) including SBRT/SABR and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was reviewed.

Key Content and Findings

Oligoprogression is defined as limited (usually 3-5) metastatic areas progressing while on/off systemic therapy in the background of oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease. Prognosis in OPD with treatment (such as LAT and systemic therapy) may be more favorable. Outcomes for patients progressing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with molecular mutations [such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)] who receive LAT are promising.

Conclusions

Patients presenting with NSCLC metastasis with progression at a limited number of sites on/off a given line of systemic therapy may have favorable outcomes with aggressive LAT, which includes SBRT/SABR/SRS. Further studies need to be completed to further optimize treatment recommendations.

Combination of radiation and immunotherapy in the treatment of genitourinary malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Due to possible synergistic effects, the combination of radiation therapy (RT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) represents an interesting therapeutic option. An increasing number of clinical trials are ongoing to investigate this combination in genitourinary malignancies and the first results are available.

OBJECTIVES

To review and summarize available data on the combination of RT and ICI in genitourinary malignancies and update the evidence for this potential therapeutic approach.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A study protocol was registered in the PROSPERO-Database. Terms of search were prostate cancer, bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, penile cancer, testicular cancer, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy in multiple literature databases and study registers. Clinical studies reporting on the combination treatment of RT and ICI were included. A systematic review of ongoing trials according to the PRISMA statement and a meta-analysis of available trials were performed.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 43 studies met the inclusion criteria examining the therapeutic effect of combined RT and ICI. For bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, and penile cancer 28, 9, 5, and 1 trial could be identified, respectively. No study was found for testicular cancer. Three phases III trials were identified, all other trials were phase I or II. Twelve studies have been completed so far. The meta-analysis of available data indicates comparable toxicity of RT plus ICI vs. ICI alone for grade 3/4 AEs. Mature efficacy data is limited with interesting early results.

CONCLUSION

This article reviews the clinical trial landscape investigating RT and ICI in genitourinary malignancies. It provides an overview of ongoing trials and discusses available results. Actual data regarding efficacy is limited, while toxicities seem comparable to ICI alone. Especially in bladder and kidney cancer, further trial results might impact on the clinical use of the combination therapy.

Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: the dawn of cancer treatment

Radiotherapy (RT) is delivered for purposes of local control, but can also exert systemic effect on remote and non-irradiated tumor deposits, which is called abscopal effect. The view of RT as a simple local treatment has dramatically changed in recent years, and it is now widely accepted that RT can provoke a systemic immune response which gives a strong rationale for the combination of RT and immunotherapy (iRT). Nevertheless, several points remain to be addressed such as the interaction of RT and immune system, the identification of the best schedules for combination with immunotherapy (IO), the expansion of abscopal effect and the mechanism to amplify iRT. To answer these crucial questions, we roundly summarize underlying rationale showing the whole immune landscape in RT and clinical trials to attempt to identify the best schedules of iRT. In consideration of the rarity of abscopal effect, we propose that the occurrence of abscopal effect induced by radiation can be promoted to 100% in view of molecular and genetic level. Furthermore, the “radscopal effect” which refers to using low-dose radiation to reprogram the tumor microenvironment may amplify the occurrence of abscopal effect and overcome the resistance of iRT. Taken together, RT could be regarded as a trigger of systemic antitumor immune response, and with the help of IO can be used as a radical and systemic treatment and be added into current standard regimen of patients with metastatic cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A narrative review

The prognosis for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is not satisfactory, even though its treatment has evolved rapidly over the past 20 years. Systemic ccRCC treatment options mainly involve antiangiogenic therapy, immune checkpoint blockade, or a combination of these therapies, and as more clinical evidence becomes available, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly dominant. Conventional ICIs lead to the restoration of T-cell activation and a reduction in T-cell depletion by specifically blocking programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) or cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), ultimately enhancing the antitumor immune response. There is no doubt that these therapies have achieved some clinical efficacy in the overall ccRCC population, but response rates and durability remain a great challenge. Therefore, novel immune checkpoints or new combination therapeutic strategies based on ICIs continue to be sought and developed. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of ICI-based therapeutic strategies in advanced ccRCC, including their mechanisms of action and the latest clinical evidence.