Pre-existing interstitial lung disease is associated with onset of nivolumab-induced pneumonitis in patients with solid tumors: a retrospective analysis

Clinical Manifestation, Risk Factors, and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge of Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Pneumonitis in Patients With Lung Cancer

SUMMARY

Immune-related adverse effects can lead to damage to various systems of the body, checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonitis (CIP) is one of the potentially lethal immune-related adverse effects. However, evidence regarding the risk factors associated with CIP is limited. To timely and accurate identification and prompt treatment of CIP, understanding the risk factors for multimorbidity among diverse study populations becomes crucial. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 1131 patients with lung cancer receiving immunotherapy to identify 110 patients with CIP, the clinical characteristics and radiographic features of patients with CIP were analyzed. A case-control study was subsequently performed to identify the risk factors of CIP. The median treatment cycle was 5 cycles and the median time to onset of CIP was 4.2 months. CIP was mainly grade I or II. Most cases improved after discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or hormone therapy. Severe CIP tended to occur earlier in comparison to mild to moderate cases. The recurrence rate was 20.6% in ICI-rechallenged patients, and patients with relapsed CIP were usually accompanied by higher-grade adverse events than at first onset. Among the 7 patients with relapse, ICI-associated deaths occurred in 2 patients (28.6%). For rechallenging with ICIs after recovery from CIP, caution should be practiced. Male [odds ratio (OR): 2.067; 95% CI: 1.194-3.579; P = 0.009], history of chest radiation (OR: 1.642; 95% CI: 1.002-2.689; P = 0.049) and underlying lung disease (OR: 2.347; 95% CI: 1.008-5.464; P =0.048) was associated with a higher risk of CIP.

Atezolizumab and nintedanib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a risk factor for the development of pneumonitis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Anti-fibrotic agents, including nintedanib, reduce the potential for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, whether nintedanib can reduce the potential for ICI-induced pneumonitis is unknown. From among 140 patients with NSCLC treated with atezolizumab monotherapy at our institution, we retrospectively investigated 4 patients with pre-existing ILD treated concurrently with nintedanib. On computed tomography (CT), a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern was present in one patient, probable UIP pattern in one patient, and indeterminate for UIP pattern in two patients. Of those four patients with pre-existing ILD, two achieved a partial response to ICI treatment, with response durations of 8.1 and 7.6 months. The other two patients experienced progressive disease. Notable adverse events included the development of non-symptomatic grade 1 pneumonitis in the patient with a probable UIP pattern and grade 3 lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage in another patient. None of the patients experienced a worsening of respiratory symptoms. In patients with NSCLC and pre-existing ILD, nintedanib might reduce the potential for ICI-induced pneumonitis and enhance the antitumor effect.

Are immune checkpoint inhibitors safe and effective in lung cancer patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease?

Aim: This study aims to clarify the efficacy and adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the lung cancer patients with a history of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: From the inception of the database to 4 April 2023, we systematically searched the four databases. Results: The objective remission rate, disease control rate, incidence of immune-associated pneumonitis (ICIP) in the combined ILD group were significantly higher than those in the non-combined ILD group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in progression-free survival, overall survival, renal insufficiency, thyroid dysfunction and gastrointestinal toxicity. Conclusion: Generally, a pre-existing ILD history can increase the efficacy and incidence of ICIs' adverse reactions. Therefore, ICIs should be administered with caution.

Clinical outcomes of interstitial lung abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA), incidental findings on computed tomography scans, have raised concerns due to their association with worse clinical outcomes. Our meta-analysis, which included studies up to April 2023 from PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library, aimed to clarify the impact of ILA on mortality, lung cancer development, and complications from lung cancer treatments. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for outcomes. Analyzing 10 studies on ILA prognosis and 9 on cancer treatment complications, we found that ILA significantly increases the risk of overall mortality (RR 2.62, 95% CI 1.94-3.54; I2 = 90%) and lung cancer development (RR 3.85, 95% CI 2.64-5.62; I2 = 22%). Additionally, cancer patients with ILA had higher risks of grade 2 radiation pneumonitis (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.71-3.03; I2 = 0%) and immune checkpoint inhibitor-related interstitial lung disease (RR 3.05, 95% CI 1.37-6.77; I2 = 83%) compared with those without ILA. In conclusion, ILA significantly associates with increased mortality, lung cancer risk, and cancer treatment-related complications, highlighting the necessity for vigilant patient management and monitoring.

Quantification of preexisting lung ground glass opacities on CT for predicting checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to life-threatening pneumonitis, and pre-existing interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) are a risk factor for checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). However, the subjective assessment of ILA and the lack of standardized methods restrict its clinical utility as a predictive factor. This study aims to identify non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients at high risk of CIP using quantitative imaging.

METHODS

This cohort study involved 206 cases in the training set and 111 cases in the validation set. It included locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients who underwent ICI therapy. A deep learning algorithm labeled the interstitial lesions and computed their volume. Two predictive models were developed to predict the probability of grade ≥ 2 CIP or severe CIP (grade ≥ 3). Cox proportional hazard models were employed to analyze predictors of progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

In a training cohort of 206 patients, 21.4% experienced CIP. Two models were developed to predict the probability of CIP based on different predictors. Model 1 utilized age, histology, and preexisting ground glass opacity (GGO) percentage of the whole lung to predict grade ≥ 2 CIP, while Model 2 used histology and GGO percentage in the right lower lung to predict grade ≥ 3 CIP. These models were validated, and their accuracy was assessed. In another exploratory analysis, the presence of GGOs involving more than one lobe on pretreatment CT scans was identified as a risk factor for progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of GGO volume and distribution on pre-treatment CT scans could assist in monitoring and manage the risk of CIP in NSCLC patients receiving ICI therapy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study's quantitative imaging and computational analysis can help identify NSCLC patients at high risk of CIP, allowing for better risk management and potentially improved outcomes in those receivingICI treatment.

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: a narrative review of a clinical conundrum

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced interstitial lung disease (DI-ILD) is increasing in incidence, due to the use of many new drugs across a broad range of cancers and chronic inflammatory diseases. The presentation and onset of DI-ILD are variable even for the same drug across different individuals. Clinical suspicion is essential for identifying these conditions, with timely drug cessation an important determinant of outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date summary of epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of DI-ILD. Relevant research articles from PubMed and Medline searches up to September 2023 were screened and summarized. Specific drugs including immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, methotrexate, and amiodarone are discussed in detail. The potential role of pharmacogenomic profiling for lung toxicity risk is considered.

EXPERT OPINION

DI-ILD is likely to be an increasingly important contributor to respiratory disability in the community. These conditions can negatively impact quality of life and patient longevity, due to associated respiratory compromise as well as cessation of evidence-based therapy for the underlying disease. This clinical conundrum is relevant to all areas of medicine, necessitating increased understanding and greater vigilance for drug-related lung toxicity.

Antiplatelet drugs may increase the risk for checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis in advanced cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are indicated for various cancers and are the mainstay of cancer immunotherapy. They are often associated with ICI-related pneumonitis (CIP), however, hindering a favorable clinical course. Recently, non-oncology concomitant drugs have been reported to affect the efficacy and toxicity of ICIs; however, the association between these drugs and the risk for CIP is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of baseline concomitant drugs on CIP incidence in ICI-treated advanced cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study that included a cohort of 511 patients with advanced cancer (melanoma and non-small-cell lung, head and neck, genitourinary, and other types of cancer) treated with ICIs. Univariable analysis was conducted to identify baseline co-medications associated with CIP incidence. A propensity score matching analysis was used to adjust for potential CIP risk factors, and multivariable analysis was carried out to assess the impact of the identified co-medications on CIP risk.

RESULTS

Forty-seven (9.2%) patients developed CIP. In these patients, the organizing pneumonia pattern was the dominant radiological phenotype, and 42.6% had grade ≥3 CIP, including one patient with grade 5. Of the investigated baseline co-medications, the proportion of antiplatelet drugs (n = 50, 9.8%) was higher in patients with CIP (23.4% versus 8.4%). After propensity score matching, the CIP incidence was higher in patients with baseline antiplatelet drugs (22% versus 6%). Finally, baseline antiplatelet drug use was demonstrated to increase the risk for CIP incidence regardless of cancer type (hazard ratio, 3.46; 95% confidence interval 1.21-9.86).

CONCLUSIONS

An association between concomitant antiplatelet drug use at baseline and an increased risk for CIP was seen in our database. This implies the importance of assessing concomitant medications for CIP risk management.

Anti‑PD‑1/PD‑L1 and anti‑CTLA‑4 associated checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in non‑small cell lung cancer: Occurrence, pathogenesis and risk factors (Review)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play a significant anti‑tumor role in the management of non‑small cell lung cancer. The most broadly used ICIs are anti‑programmed death 1 (PD‑1), anti‑programmed cell death‑ligand 1, and anti‑cytotoxic T lymphocyte‑associated antigen‑4 monoclonal antibody. Compared with traditional chemotherapy, ICIs have the advantages of greater efficiency and more specific targeting. However, the resulting immune‑related adverse events limit the clinical application of ICIs, especially checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). CIP chiefly occurs within 6 months of administration of ICIs. Excessive activation and amplification of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, helper T cells, downregulation of regulatory T cells, and over‑secretion of pro‑inflammatory cytokines are the dominant mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of CIP. The dysregulation of innate immune cells, such as an increase in inflammatory monocytes, dendritic cells, neutrophils and M1 polarization of macrophages, an increase in IL‑10 and IL‑35, and a decrease in eosinophils, may underlie CIP. Although contested, several factors may accelerate CIP, such as a history of previous respiratory disease, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, administration of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, PD‑1 blockers, first‑line application of ICIs, and combined immunotherapy. Interestingly, first‑line ICIs plus chemotherapy may reduce CIP. Steroid hormones remain the primary treatment strategy against grade ≥2 CIP, although cytokine blockers are promising therapeutic agents. Herein, the current research on CIP occurrence, clinical and radiological characteristics, pathogenesis, risk factors, and management is summarized to further expand our understanding, clarify the prognosis, and guide treatment.

Clinical significance of KL-6 in immune-checkpoint inhibitor treatment for non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) functions as a tumor marker, as well as a diagnostic tool for interstitial pneumonia (IP). However, the significance of KL-6 in the immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially in patients without IP, is unknown.

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study, which included patients with advanced NSCLC who received ICI therapy, analyzed the association between serum KL-6 values and ICI efficacy and the association between serum KL-6 values and ICI-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) occurrence, focusing primarily on patients without IP.

RESULTS

In total, 322 patients had available KL-6 values before ICI therapy. Among 202 patients without IP who received ICI monotherapy, the high-KL-6 group (≥ 500 U/mL) showed significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the low-KL-6 group (< 500 U/mL) (median: 2.1 vs. 3.6 months, p = 0.048; median: 9.2 vs. 14.5 months, p = 0.035). There was no significant difference in response rate between the KL-6 high and low groups (19% vs. 29%, p = 0.14). In the multivariate analysis, high KL-6 was a significant predictor of poor PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.11, p = 0.012) and OS (HR, 1.51; 95% CI 1.07 - 2.13, p = 0.019) for patients treated with ICI monotherapy. There was no significant difference in the occurrence rate of ILD between the high KL-6 and low KL-6 groups in patients with (20% vs. 15%, p = 1.00) or without IP (12% vs. 12%, p = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

In ICI monotherapy for NSCLC without IP, elevated serum KL-6 levels were associated with poorer outcomes.

Common methodological pitfalls in ICI pneumonitis risk prediction studies

Background

Pneumonitis is one of the most common adverse events induced by the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), accounting for a 20% of all ICI-associated deaths. Despite numerous efforts to identify risk factors and develop predictive models, there is no clinically deployed risk prediction model for patient risk stratification or for guiding subsequent monitoring. We believe this is due to systemic suboptimal approaches in study designs and methodologies in the literature. The nature and prevalence of different methodological approaches has not been thoroughly examined in prior systematic reviews.

Methods

The PubMed, medRxiv and bioRxiv databases were used to identify studies that aimed at risk factor discovery and/or risk prediction model development for ICI-induced pneumonitis (ICI pneumonitis). Studies were then analysed to identify common methodological pitfalls and their contribution to the risk of bias, assessed using the QUIPS and PROBAST tools.

Results

There were 51 manuscripts eligible for the review, with Japan-based studies over-represented, being nearly half (24/51) of all papers considered. Only 2/51 studies had a low risk of bias overall. Common bias-inducing practices included unclear diagnostic method or potential misdiagnosis, lack of multiple testing correction, the use of univariate analysis for selecting features for multivariable analysis, discretization of continuous variables, and inappropriate handling of missing values. Results from the risk model development studies were also likely to have been overoptimistic due to lack of holdout sets.

Conclusions

Studies with low risk of bias in their methodology are lacking in the existing literature. High-quality risk factor identification and risk model development studies are urgently required by the community to give the best chance of them progressing into a clinically deployable risk prediction model. Recommendations and alternative approaches for reducing the risk of bias were also discussed to guide future studies.

Immunotherapy-related pneumonitis and the synergic impact of thoracic radiation and preexisting interstitial lung disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the frontline of therapy for most cancers. Although ICIs are sometimes considered to be less harmful than systemic chemotherapies, ICIs may cause immune-related adverse events, which are cases of off-target inflammation in healthy tissues. Pneumonitis, an immune-related adverse event, is the leading cause of therapy-related mortality with ICIs. The aim of this review is to discuss how preexisting interstitial lung disease (ILD) and thoracic radiation increase the risk for ICI-pneumonitis. We discuss potential mechanisms of lung injury and how pneumonitis may impact cancer treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preexisting ILD and thoracic radiation are major risk factors for ICI-pneumonitis. The mechanisms of injury are still not fully understood but may involve the same inflammatory and profibrotic cytokines as those seen in sporadic ILD. Thoracic radiation increases the risk for ICI-pneumonitis and may synergize with preexisting ILD to worsen toxicity.

SUMMARY

Preexisting ILD and thoracic radiation may increase the risk for the future development of ICI-pneumonitis. However, while these should not preclude potentially life-saving immunotherapy, in some cases, an alternative treatment strategy may be advisable. A multidisciplinary approach is required involving oncologists, pulmonologists, and radiation oncologists to guide in the selection of cancer treatment and in the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonitis.

A Risk-Scoring Model for Severe Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Pneumonitis: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Checkpoint inhibitor-related pneumonitis (CIP) is one of the most common serious and fatal adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The study sought to identify risk factors of all-grade and severe CIP and to construct a risk-scoring model specifically for severe CIP.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective case-control study involved 666 lung cancer patients who received ICIs between April 2018 and March 2021. The study analyzed patient demographic, preexisting lung diseases, and the characteristics and treatment of lung cancer to determine the risk factors for all-grade and severe CIP. A risk score for severe CIP was developed and validated in a separate patient cohort of 187 patients.

RESULTS

Among 666 patients, 95 patients were afflicted with CIP, of which 37 were severe cases. Multivariate analysis revealed age ≥ 65 years, current smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, squamous cell carcinoma, prior thoracic radiotherapy, and extra-thoracic radiotherapy during ICI were independently associated with CIP events. Five factors, emphysema (odds ratio [OR] 2.87), interstitial lung disease (OR 4.76), pleural effusion (OR 3.00), history of radiotherapy during ICI (OR 4.30), and single-agent immunotherapy (OR 2.44) were independently associated with severe CIP and were incorporated into a risk-score model (score ranging 0-17). The area under the model receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.769 in the development cohort and 0.749 in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The simple risk-scoring model may predict severe CIP in lung cancer patients receiving ICIs. For patients with high scores, clinicians should use ICIs with caution or strengthen the monitoring of these patients.

Role of Nivolumab in the Management of First-Line Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer in Combination with Chemotherapy: Lessons from the Japanese Experience

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), such as anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibodies, has provided clinical benefits in various cancer types including advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Nivolumab, a monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody, firstly showed an improvement in the overall survival (OS) in patients with AGC in the ATTRACTION-2 trial. Recently, chemotherapy plus nivolumab, as a first-line treatment for AGC, showed both OS and progression-free survival (PFS) benefits in patients with PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥5 in the global CheckMate-649 trial, and demonstrated PFS benefit irrespective of CPS status in the Asian ATTRACTION-4 trial. Based on these results, chemotherapy plus nivolumab in a first-line treatment was approved worldwide. However, the approval requirements and recommendations are different according to the approval agent or country. Thus, this review summarized the clinical trials of chemotherapy plus anti-PD1 antibody as a first-line treatment and focused on the role of nivolumab combined with chemotherapy mainly from the viewpoint of the Japanese experience.

Pulmonary adverse events following immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have rapidly become a mainstay of cancer treatment. However, immune modulation resulting from checkpoint inhibition can cause inflammation in any organ system, with pneumonitis being one of the most severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we review the most recent literature on pulmonary adverse events following ICIs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of data from trials of antiprogrammed death-1 (PD-1; nivolumab, pembrolizumab), anti-PD-ligand-1 (PD-L1; atezolizumab, avelumab, durvalumab) and anticytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4; ipilimumab or tremelimumab) in patients with advanced cancer have explored the relative risk and incidence of lung toxicity among different tumor types and therapeutic regimens. They have showed that the incidence of all-grade (1-4) and high-grade (3-4) pneumonitis is significantly higher in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared with other tumor types. In addition, they have demonstrated that immunotherapy, especially monoimmunotherapy, has a significantly lower risk of irAEs compared to immune-chemotherapy. Treatment for lung cancer, preexisting interstitial lung disease, smoking history and male sex appear to increase the risk for ICI-related pneumonitis.

SUMMARY

Lung toxicity is an uncommon but potentially severe and even fatal complication of ICIs. Timely recognition is critically important but challenging, particularly in patients with lung cancer wherein drug toxicity can mimic disease progression or recurrence.