Expectations of treatment outcomes in patients with spinal metastases; what do we tell our patients? A qualitative study

Introducing the New Patient Expectations in Spine Oncology Questionnaire

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

It has been hypothesized that a discrepancy between pretreatment expectations and perceived outcomes is a significant source of patient dissatisfaction. Currently, there is lack in understanding and tools to assess patient expectations regarding the outcomes of treatment for spinal metastases. The objective of this study was therefore to develop a patient expectations questionnaire regarding the outcomes after surgery and/or radiotherapy for spinal metastases.

METHODS

A multiphase international qualitative study was conducted. Phase 1 of the study included semistructured interviews with patients and relatives to understand their expectations of the outcomes of treatment. In addition, physicians were interviewed about their communication practices with patients regarding treatment and expected outcomes. In phase 2, items were developed based on the results of the interviews in phase 1. In phase 3, patients were interviewed to validate the content and language of the questionnaire. Selection of the final items was based on feedback from patients regarding content, language, and relevance.

RESULTS

In phase 1, 24 patients and 22 physicians were included. A total of 34 items were developed for the preliminary questionnaire. After phase 3, a total of 22 items were retained for the final version of the questionnaire. The questionnaire is divided into 3 sections: (1) patient expectations regarding treatment outcomes, (2) prognosis, and (3) consultation with the physician. The items cover expectations related to pain, analgesia requirements, daily and physical function, overall quality of life, life expectancy, and information provided by the physician.

CONCLUSION

The new Patient Expectations in Spine Oncology questionnaire was developed to evaluate patient expectations regarding the outcomes after treatment for spinal metastases. The Patient Expectations in Spine Oncology questionnaire will allow physicians to systematically assess patient expectations of planned treatment and thus help guide patients toward realistic expectations of treatment outcome.

Patient Expectations About Palliative Treatment for Symptomatic Spinal Metastases: A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVES

Patients with spinal metastases often receive palliative surgery or radiation therapy to maintain or improve health-related quality of life. Patients with unrealistic expectations regarding treatment outcomes have been shown to be less satisfied with their post-treatment health status. This study evaluated expectations of patients with spinal metastases scheduled for surgery and/or radiation therapy.

METHODS

Individual semistructured interviews were conducted with patients with symptomatic spinal metastases before and 6 weeks after surgery and/or radiation therapy. Expectations regarding treatment outcomes were discussed before treatment, and level of fulfillment of these pretreatment expectations was discussed after treatment. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed according to the thematic analysis method to identify themes.

RESULTS

Before treatment, patients thought they were not, or minimally, informed about (expected) treatment outcomes, but they felt well informed about treatment procedures and possible complications. Although patients expected pain relief and improvement in daily functioning, they found it difficult to describe any recovery timeline or the impact of these expected improvements on their daily life. Patients generally understood that treatment was not curative, but lacked insight into the impact of treatment on life expectancy given that this was hardly discussed by their surgeon and/or radiation oncologist. Pretreatment expectations regarding pain and daily functioning were only partially met in most patients post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients thought they were not, or only minimally, informed about expected outcomes after surgery and/or radiation therapy for symptomatic spinal metastases. Improvements in patient-physician communication and counseling could help guide patients toward realistic pretreatment expectations.

Application Value of the Workshop Practice Teaching Method Based on Target-Oriented Study Modules on the Internet in Orthopedic Rehabilitation

Objective

To explore the application value of the workshop practice teaching method based on target-oriented study modules on the internet in orthopedic rehabilitation.

Methods

Thirty interns (2019-2020) in the rehabilitation department of our hospital were selected as the control group, another thirty interns (2021) in the rehabilitation department of our hospital were selected as the experimental group, and their materials were retrospectively reviewed. Both groups were given the three-month practice teaching. Besides, the conventional practice teaching method was applied to the control group, and the workshop practice teaching method based on target-oriented study modules on the internet was applied to the experimental group. After the practice teaching, the united examination paper and assessment table of the rehabilitation operation process were used to evaluate the interns' scores of theoretical knowledge about orthopedic rehabilitation, scores of practical skills, and comprehensive scores of clinical practice in the two groups. The evaluation team consisting of 5 guiding experts in the scientific research office assessed the teaching quality of the two methods.

Results

Compared with the control group, the experimental group had a notably higher score of theoretical knowledge about orthopedic rehabilitation, higher score of practical skills, and higher comprehensive score of clinical practice (92.47 ± 4.81 vs. 86.43 ± 5.12, 91.30 ± 5.68 vs. 81.53 ± 7.21, and 91.88 ± 2.45 vs. 83.98 ± 4.42, P < 0.001). According to the evaluation team, the teaching quality of the experimental group was observably higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05), and there was no remarkable difference in the scores of teachers' performance between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The workshop practice teaching method based on target-oriented study modules on the internet, as a high-quality “Internet+” practice teaching mode, can improve the orthopedic interns' scores of theoretical knowledge and practical operation ability and enhance their comprehensive qualities of orthopedic rehabilitation in all respects.