No axillary surgical treatment for lymph node-negative patients after ultra-sonography [NAUTILUS]: protocol of a prospective randomized clinical trial

Differences in axillary ultrasound protocols among prospective de-escalating axillary surgical staging trials in clinically node negative early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Surgical axillary staging of the axilla is a topic of debate regarding the potential of de-escalation in clinically node negative (cN0) early breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Axillary ultrasound is important to determine clinical nodal status. The aim of the current narrative review is to provide an overview of prospective trials on de-escalating axillary surgical staging in cN0 early breast cancer patients, with an emphasis on axillary ultrasound protocols.

METHODS

This narrative review provides an overview of the prospective de-escalating axillary surgical staging trials, in terms of comparing sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus complete omission of SLNB, in cT1/2N0 patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Information from each trial was collected, including reported axillary ultrasound protocols (including cortical thickness cut-off value) and axillary ultrasound-guided biopsy technique (fine-needle aspiration or core-needle biopsy).

RESULTS

There is one recently published prospective trial and three ongoing prospective trials within the topic of this narrative review. Number of included patients in these trials ranges from 1405 to 5505 patients. The included trials differed whether or not to include patients with suspicious axillary ultrasound findings and a negative ultrasound-guided biopsy. Cortical thickness cut-off value ranged from 2.3 mm to 3.0 mm. Different ultrasound-guided biopsy techniques were performed among the included trials.

CONCLUSION

Prospective de-escalating axillary surgical staging trials in clinically node negative early breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy do report differences in terms of axillary ultrasound protocols and ultrasound-guided biopsy techniques. Axillary ultrasound protocols do require uniformity in order to improve extrapolation of these trial results.

Can negative axillary ultrasound reliably predict pathologically negative axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients with cT ≤3 cm, cN0, and HER2-positive?-a retrospective, single-institution study

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the leading cancer in women globally, with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive subtype accounting for 15-20% of cases and exhibiting aggressive behavior. The standard of care for operable BC has evolved to include neoadjuvant systemic therapy, which can guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes, particularly in HER2+ BC. This study aims to investigate whether axillary ultrasound has a good negative predictive value (NPV) for early HER2 BC patients and to identify clinicopathological factors that can impact the axillary lymph node metastasis.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study evaluated the medical records of 135 patients with HER2+ BC, cT ≤3 cm, and clinically negative axillary lymph nodes from 2018 to 2020. The study aimed to determine the NPV of axillary ultrasound for pathologically negative axillary lymph node status and to identify factors associated with axillary lymph node metastasis.

Results

The NPV of axillary ultrasound was 78.5%, increasing to 89.6% and 93.3% when considering 0-1 and 0-2 metastatic lymph nodes, respectively. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was significantly associated with axillary lymph node metastasis, with a 2.2-fold increased risk.

Conclusions

Axillary ultrasound shows good predictive value for axillary lymph node negativity in HER2+ BC patients with small tumors. However, the presence of LVI increases the risk of metastasis, suggesting a need for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings contribute to personalized treatment strategies for early HER2+ BC, emphasizing the role of axillary ultrasound in clinical decision-making.

Omission of axillary surgery in cN0, postmenopausal ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment

Background

Previous clinical trials have diminished the significance of lymph node (LN) metastasis and axillary surgery in breast cancer, particularly in cN0, postmenopausal estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment (BCT). We assessed the replacement of axillary surgery with preoperative imaging modalities by analyzing the proportion of high nodal burden (HNB) patients with ≥3 LN metastases in these patients.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 333 cN0, postmenopausal ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients who underwent BCT in two hospitals between January 2003 and December 2017. The proportion of LN metastasis patients and the number of metastatic LN were investigated. Risk factors of LN metastasis were analyzed and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared.

Results

Axillary surgery confirmed LN metastasis in 81 (24.3%) of the cN0 patients. The clinical tumor size (cT) and age were factors associated with LN metastasis [cT: odds ratio (OR), 2.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.69-5.05, P<0.001; age: OR, 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.99, P=0.048]. However, HNB patients with ≥3 LN metastases were 15 (4.5%) of all the patients. There was statistically significant difference in the incidence of HNB between patients with cT1 tumors (3.6%) and those with cT2 tumors (7.4%) (P<0.001).

Conclusions

In cN0, postmenopausal ER-positive/HER2-negative patients who underwent BCT, patients with cT1 tumors had lower rate of LN metastasis, and there were fewer instances of HNB. Therefore, in these patients, omission of axillary surgery including SLNB can be carefully considered.

Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy on Management of Older Women With Clinically Node-Negative, Early-Stage, ER+/HER2-, Invasive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In 2016 the Choosing Wisely guidelines advised against routine performance of a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in women ≥ 70 years of age with clinically node negative (cN0), early-stage, oestrogen receptor positive/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (ER+/HER2-), invasive breast cancer. The argument in favour of its continued performance is that it may serve as a useful guide for subsequent management. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting on rate of adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy and performance of completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) post SLNB in women aged ≥ 65 years with cN0, early-stage, ER+/HER2-, invasive breast cancer were included. A random effects meta-analysis was performed with summary estimates made using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Ten retrospective studies across 4 countries. Of 105,514 patients, 15,509 had a positive SLNB and 90,005 had a negative SLNB. On meta-analysis, a positive SLNB was significantly associated with receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 4.64 (95% CI 3.18, 6.77), P < .00001), adjuvant radiotherapy (1.71 (95% CI 1.18, 2.47), P = .005) and undergoing completion axillary lymph node dissection (OR 68.97 (95% CI, 7.47, 636.88), P = .0002). Adjuvant treatment decisions continue to be influenced by SLNB positivity in the era of the Choosing Wisely guidelines. The effects of a positive SLNB and subsequent treatments on outcomes remain inconclusive. However, it is likely clinicians are continuing to over-investigate and over-treat this cohort.

Does Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Influence Subsequent Management Decisions in Women With Breast Cancer ≥ 70 Years Old?

BACKGROUND

There have been ongoing attempts to de-escalate surgical intervention in older breast cancer patients in recent years. However, there remains ongoing hesitancy amongst surgeons to de-implement axillary staging in this cohort. The supporting argument for performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is that it may guide subsequent management.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of 356 SLNBs, in 342 women ≥ 70 years of age with invasive breast cancer, between 2014 and 2022 in a single institution. Data were collected on patient and tumor characteristics and subsequent management for all patients and for patients with ER+/HER2-, early-stage disease.

RESULTS

Positive SLNB significantly increased likelihood of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (CTh) in patients aged 70-75 in all clinical subtypes (OR 4.0, 95% CI, 1.6-10; P = .0035). Positive SLNB did not significantly increase likelihood of receiving adjuvant CTh in patients aged 75-80, however, an Oncotype Dx score of ≥ 26 did (OR 34.50, 95% CI, 3.00-455.2; P = .0103). Positive SLNB was significantly associated with receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (RTh) in all patients aged 70-75 (OR 4.5, 95% CI, 2.0-11; P = .0004) and 75-80 (OR 9.7, 95% CI, 2.7-46; P = .0015). In patients aged ≥ 80 years, positive SLNB did not have a significant influence on subsequent treatments.

CONCLUSION

In this study, SLNB did not significantly influence subsequent management decisions in patients over 80 and should rarely be performed in this cohort. However, SLNB still had a role in patients aged 70-80 and should be used selectively in this cohort.

A nomogram model for predicting the risk of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with early breast cancer and cN0 status

Axillary staging is commonly performed via sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early breast cancer (EBC) presenting with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes (cN0). The present study aimed to investigate the association between axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM), clinicopathological characteristics of tumors and results from axillary ultrasound (US) scanning. Moreover, a nomogram model was developed to predict the risk for ALNM based on relevant factors. Data from 998 patients who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were then randomly divided into a training and validation group in a 7:3 ratio. In the training group, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify the cutoff values for continuous measurement data. R software was used to identify independent ALNM risk variables in the training group using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The selected independent risk factors were incorporated into a nomogram. The model differentiation was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), while calibration was evaluated through calibration charts and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. To assess clinical applicability, a decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted. Internal verification was performed via 1000 rounds of bootstrap resampling. Among the 998 patients with EBC, 228 (22.84%) developed ALNM. Multivariate logistic analysis identified lymphovascular invasion, axillary US findings, maximum diameter and molecular subtype as independent risk factors for ALNM. The Akaike Information Criterion served as the basis for both nomogram development and model selection. Robust differentiation was shown by the AUC values of 0.855 (95% CI, 0.817-0.892) and 0.793 (95% CI, 0.725-0.857) for the training and validation groups, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded P-values of 0.869 and 0.847 for the training and validation groups, respectively, and the calibration chart aligned closely with the ideal curve, affirming excellent calibration. DCA showed that the net benefit from the nomogram significantly outweighed both the 'no intervention' and the 'full intervention' approaches, falling within the threshold probability interval of 12-97% for the training group and 17-82% for the validation group. This underscores the robust clinical utility of the model. A nomogram model was successfully constructed and validated to predict the risk of ALNM in patients with EBC and cN0 status. The model demonstrated favorable differentiation, calibration and clinical applicability, offering valuable guidance for assessing axillary lymph node status in this population.

Modern management of the axilla

Surgical management of the axilla has evolved considerably in recent years, with a strong focus on de-escalation to minimise morbidity whilst maintaining oncological outcomes. Current trials will focus on the omission of Sentinel node biopsy in select groups of patients, while axillary lymph node dissection will be reserved for those with more aggressive disease.

Ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in invasive breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To develop a nomogram for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) in patients with invasive breast cancer.

METHODS

We included 307 patients with clinicopathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer. The cohort was divided into a training group (n=215) and a validation group (n=92). Ultrasound images were used to extract radiomics features. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm helped select pertinent features, from which Radiomics Scores (Radscores) were calculated using the LASSO regression equation. We developed three logistic regression models based on Radscores and 2D image features, and assessed the models' performance in the validation group. A nomogram was created from the best-performing model.

RESULTS

In the training set, the area under the curve (AUC) for the Radscore model, 2D feature model, and combined model were 0.76, 0.85, and 0.88, respectively. In the validation set, the AUCs were 0.71, 0.78, and 0.83, respectively. The combined model demonstrated good calibration and promising clinical utility.

CONCLUSION

Our ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram can accurately and non-invasively predict ALNM in breast cancer, suggesting potential clinical applications to optimize surgical and medical strategies.

Personalizing Locoregional Therapy in Patients With Breast Cancer in 2024: Tailoring Axillary Surgery, Escalating Lymphatic Surgery, and Implementing Evidence-Based Hypofractionated Radiotherapy

The management of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer is continually evolving. Recent data now support omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in most patients with metastases in up to two sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) during upfront surgery and those with residual isolated tumor cells after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). In the upfront surgery setting, ALND is still indicated, however, in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer or more than two positive SLNs and, after NACT, in case of residual micrometastases and macrometastases. Omission of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be considered in many postmenopausal patients with small luminal breast cancer, particularly when axillary ultrasound is negative. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently aiming at eliminating the remaining indications for ALND and also establishing omission of SLNB in a broader patient population. The movement to deescalate axillary staging is in part because of the association between ALND and lymphedema, which is swelling of an extremity because of lymphatic damage and obstructed lymphatic drainage. To reduce the risk of developing this condition, patients undergoing ALND can undergo reverse mapping of the axilla and immediate reconstruction or bypass of the lymphatics from the involved extremity. Decongestion and compression are the foundation of conservative treatment for established lymphedema, while lymphovenous bypass and lymph node transfer are surgical procedures to address the physiologic dysfunction. Radiotherapy is an essential component of breast locoregional therapy: more than three decades of radiation research has optimized treatment according to patient's risk of local recurrence while substantially reducing the number of treatment visits. High-quality RCTs have shown the efficacy and safety of hypofractionation-more than 2Gy radiation dose per treatment (fraction)-significantly reducing the burden of radiotherapy treatment for many patients with breast cancer. In 2024, guidelines recommend no more than 15-16 fractions for whole-breast and nodal radiotherapy, with some recommending five fractions for whole-breast radiotherapy. In addition, simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) has been shown to be noninferior to sequential boost with regards to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence with similar or reduced long-term side effects, also reducing overall treatment length. Further RCTs are underway investigating other indications for five fractions, including SIB and regional node irradiation, such that, in future, it may be possible for the majority of breast radiotherapy patients to be treated with a 1-week course. This manuscript serves to outline the latest updates on axillary surgical staging, lymphatic surgery, and evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Axillary Surgery for Breast Cancer in 2024

Axillary surgery for patients with breast cancer (BC) in 2024 is becoming increasingly specific, moving away from the previous 'one size fits all' radical approach. The goal is to spare morbidity whilst maintaining oncologic safety. In the upfront surgery setting, a first landmark randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the omission of any surgical axillary staging in patients with unremarkable clinical examination and axillary ultrasound showed non-inferiority to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB). The study population consisted of 87.8% postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative BC. Patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer and up to two positive SLNs can safely be spared axillary dissection (ALND) even in the context of mastectomy or extranodal extension. In patients enrolled in the TAXIS trial, adjuvant systemic treatment was shown to be similar with or without ALND despite the loss of staging information. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), targeted lymph node removal with or without SLNB showed a lower false-negative rate to determine nodal pathological complete response (pCR) compared to SLNB alone. However, oncologic outcomes do not appear to differ in patients with nodal pCR determined by either one of the two concepts, according to a recently published global, retrospective, real-world study. Real-world studies generally have a lower level of evidence than RCTs, but they are feasible quickly and with a large sample size. Another global real-world study provides evidence that even patients with residual isolated tumor cells can be safely spared from ALND. In general, few indications for ALND remain. Three randomized controlled trials are ongoing for patients with clinically node-positive BC in the upfront surgery setting and residual disease after NACT. Pending the results of these trials, ALND remains indicated in these patients.

De-escalation of axillary treatment in the event of a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in cT1-2 N0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy: nationwide registry study (BOOG 2013-07)

BACKGROUND

Trials have demonstrated the safety of omitting completion axillary lymph node dissection in patients with cT1-2 N0 breast cancer operated with breast-conserving surgery who have limited metastatic burden in the sentinel lymph node. The aim of this registry study was to provide insight into the oncological safety of omitting completion axillary treatment in patients operated with mastectomy who have limited-volume sentinel lymph node metastasis.

METHODS

Women diagnosed in 2013-2014 with unilateral cT1-2 N0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy, with one to three sentinel lymph node metastases (pN1mi-pN1a), were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, and classified by axillary treatment: no completion axillary treatment, completion axillary lymph node dissection, regional radiotherapy, or completion axillary lymph node dissection followed by regional radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was 5-year regional recurrence rate. Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free interval and overall survival, among others.

RESULTS

In total, 1090 patients were included (no completion axillary treatment, 219 (20.1%); completion axillary lymph node dissection, 437 (40.1%); regional radiotherapy, 327 (30.0%); completion axillary lymph node dissection and regional radiotherapy, 107 (9.8%)). Patients in the group without completion axillary treatment had more favourable tumour characteristics and were older. The overall 5-year regional recurrence rate was 1.3%, and did not differ significantly between the groups. The recurrence-free interval was also comparable among groups. The group of patients who did not undergo completion axillary treatment had statistically significantly worse 5-year overall survival, owing to a higher percentage of non-cancer deaths.

CONCLUSION

In this registry study of patients with cT1-2 N0 breast cancer treated with mastectomy, with low-volume sentinel lymph node metastasis, the 5-year regional recurrence rate was low and comparable between patients with and without completion axillary treatment.

Reducing axillary surgery in breast cancer

This article provides a brief account of the recent evolution of the highly controversial surgical management of the positive axilla in patients with breast cancer, an issue still open to disparate surgical procedures. This short review highlights the reports that supply the rationale for current trends in reducing the aggressiveness of this surgery and discusses the course of the trials still in progress pointing in the same direction, thus supporting the principle of not performing axillary lymph node dissection for staging purposes alone.

Deep learning radiomics based prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN) for the preoperative evaluation of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis status in patients with a newly diagnosed unifocal breast cancer. A total of 883 eligible patients with breast cancer who underwent preoperative breast and axillary ultrasound were retrospectively enrolled between April 1, 2016, and June 30, 2022. The training cohort comprised 621 patients from Hospital I; the external validation cohorts comprised 112, 87, and 63 patients from Hospitals II, III, and IV, respectively. A DLR signature was created based on the deep learning and handcrafted features, and the DLRN was then developed based on the signature and four independent clinical parameters. The DLRN exhibited good performance, yielding areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.914, 0.929, and 0.952 in the three external validation cohorts, respectively. Decision curve and calibration curve analyses demonstrated the favorable clinical value and calibration of the nomogram. In addition, the DLRN outperformed five experienced radiologists in all cohorts. This has the potential to guide appropriate management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer, including avoiding overtreatment.

Is routine axillary lymph node dissection needed to tailor systemic treatments for breast cancer patients in the era of molecular oncology? A position paper of the Italian National Association of Breast Surgeons (ANISC)

BACKGROUND

De-escalation of axillary surgery in breast cancer (BC) management began when sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as standard of care in patients with node-negative BC. The second step consolidated ALND omission in selected subgroups of BC patients with up to two macrometastases and recognized BC molecular and genomic implication in predicting prognosis and planning adjuvant treatment. Outcomes from the recent RxPONDER and monarchE trials have come to challenge the previous cut-off of two SLN in order to inform decisions on systemic therapies for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor type-2 (HER2) negative BC, as the criteria included a cut-off of respectively three and four SLNs. In view of the controversy that this may lift in surgical practice, the Italian National Association of Breast Surgeons (Associazione Nazionale Italiana Senologi Chirurghi, ANISC) reviewed data regarding the latest trials on this topic and proposes an implementation in clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed the available literature offering data on the pathological nodal status of cN0 breast cancer patients.

RESULTS

The rates of pN2 status in cN0 patients ranges from 3.5 % to 16 %; pre-surgical diagnostic definition of axillary lymph node status in cN0 patients by ultrasound could be useful to inform about a possible involvement of ≥4 lymph nodes in this specific sub-groups of women.

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian National Association of Breast Surgeons (ANISC) considers that for HR + HER2-/cN0-pN1(sn) BC patients undergoing breast conserving treatment the preoperative workup should be optimized for a more detailed assessment of the axilla and the technique of SLNB should be optimized, if considered appropriate by the surgeon, not considering routine ALND always indicated to determine treatment recommendations according to criteria of eligibility to RxPONDER and monarch-E trials.

Nodal positivity in patients with clinically and radiologically node-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: multicentre collaborative study

BACKGROUND

The necessity of performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically and radiologically node-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been questioned. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of nodal positivity in these patients and to identify clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ypN+).

METHODS

A retrospective multicentre study was performed. Patients with cT1-3 cN0 breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2016 and 2021 were included. Negative nodal status was defined as the absence of palpable lymph nodes, and the absence of suspicious nodes on axillary ultrasonography, or the absence of tumour cells on axillary nodal fine needle aspiration or core biopsy.

RESULTS

A total of 371 patients were analysed. Overall, 47 patients (12.7%) had a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Nodal positivity was identified in 22 patients (29.0%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- tumours, 12 patients (13.8%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, 3 patients (5.6%) with hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, and 10 patients (6.5%) with triple-negative breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that multicentric disease was associated with a higher likelihood of ypN+ (OR 2.66, 95% c.i. 1.18 to 6.01; P = 0.018), whilst a radiological complete response in the breast was associated with a reduced likelihood of ypN+ (OR 0.10, 95% c.i. 0.02 to 0.42; P = 0.002), regardless of molecular subtype. Only 3% of patients who had a radiological complete response in the breast were ypN+. The majority of patients (85%) with a positive sentinel node proceeded to axillary lymph node dissection and 93% had N1 disease.

CONCLUSION

The rate of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients who achieve a radiological complete response in the breast is exceptionally low for all molecular subtypes.

Reconsidering the Role of Frozen Section in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Mastectomy Patients

INTRODUCTION

Axillary lymph node dissection was recommended for mastectomy patients with more than two nodal metastases from sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conventionally, intraoperative frozen section was sent routinely to reduce the need for second-stage axillary lymph node dissection; however, recent global trend has seen decreasing usage of the intraoperative analyses. This pilot study conducted in Thailand aimed to evaluate the role of intraoperative frozen section of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy.

METHODS

A 5-y retrospective study of 1773 patients was conducted in Thailand. The inclusion criteria were early-stage breast cancer patients with either radiologically negative nodes, or radiographically borderline nodes found to be negative on fine needle aspiration who underwent mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Reoperations were indicated when three or more nodal metastases were detected on the pathological analysis. The reoperation rate prevented by frozen section and the reoperation rate needed for those with permanent section alone were reported.

RESULTS

Among 265 patients, 202 patients underwent concomitant intraoperative frozen section while the remaining 63 patients underwent permanent section alone. Six patients (3.0%) from the frozen section group and one patient (1.6%) from the permanent section group were found with more than two nodal metastases. Despite using intraoperative frozen sections, only one patient from each group required reoperation. There was no significant difference in the number of patients requiring reoperation between the frozen section group and the permanent section group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides strong evidence to all surgeons that in early breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy with permanent section analysis alone may not lower the standard of care compared to using additional intraoperative frozen section analysis. Adopting this practice may lead to decreased operation costs, operative time, and anesthetic side effects.

Luminal A Versus B After Choosing Wisely: Does Lymph Node Surgery Affect Oncologic Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

In 2016, the Choosing Wisely campaign recommended against routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in women ≥ 70 years old diagnosed with early-stage hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. No distinction is made between luminal A and luminal B phenotypes, despite luminal B being considered more aggressive. This study evaluates the effect of SLNB on oncologic outcomes in HER2- luminal B versus luminal A breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed an IRB-approved, single institution, retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2020 of women aged ≥ 70 years with clinically node negative, HR+ breast cancer undergoing definitive surgical treatment. Luminal status was defined by gene expression panel testing, Ki67%, and/or pathologic grading. Primary endpoints included locoregional recurrence (LRR), disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

SLNB did not correlate with significant differences in LRR in luminal A (p = 0.92) or luminal B (p = 0.96) disease. SLNB correlated with improved DFS (p < 0.01) and OS (p < 0.001) in luminal A disease, but not in luminal B disease (DFS p = 0.73; OS p = 0.36). On multivariate analysis, age (HR = 1.17; p < 0.01) and tumor size (HR = 1.03; p < 0.05) were associated with DFS, while SLNB was not (p = 0.71). Luminal status (HR = 0.52, p < 0.05), age (HR = 1.15, p < 0.01), and comorbidities (HR = 1.35, p < 0.05) were associated with OS, but not SLNB (p = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that SLNB may be safely omitted in patients aged ≥ 70 years with luminal B disease given similar LRR in luminal A disease. Our findings suggest that DFS and OS are driven by tumor biology, patient age, and comorbidities rather than receipt of SLNB.

Future Directions in the Assessment of Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Breast Cancer

Background and Objectives: Breast cancer (BC) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and accurate assessment of axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) is crucial for patient management and outcomes. We aim to summarize the current state of ALN assessment techniques in BC and provide insights into future directions. Materials and Methods: This review discusses various imaging techniques used for ALN evaluation, including ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. It highlights advancements in these techniques and their potential to improve diagnostic accuracy. The review also examines landmark clinical trials that have influenced axillary management, such as the Z0011 trial and the IBCSG 23-01 trial. The role of artificial intelligence (AI), specifically deep learning algorithms, in improving ALN assessment is examined. Results: The review outlines the key findings of these trials, which demonstrated the feasibility of avoiding axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in certain patient populations with low sentinel lymph node (SLN) burden. It also discusses ongoing trials, including the SOUND trial, which investigates the use of axillary ultrasound to identify patients who can safely avoid sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Furthermore, the potential of emerging techniques and the integration of AI in enhancing ALN assessment accuracy are presented. Conclusions: The review concludes that advancements in ALN assessment techniques have the potential to improve patient outcomes by reducing surgical complications while maintaining accurate disease staging. However, challenges such as standardization of imaging protocols and interpretation criteria need to be addressed. Future research should focus on large-scale clinical trials to validate emerging techniques and establish their efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Over-all, this review provides valuable insights into the current status and future directions of ALN assessment in BC, highlighting opportunities for improving patient care.

Use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in elderly patients with breast cancer - 10-year experience from a Swiss university hospital

BACKGROUND

The Choosing Wisely initiative recommended the omission of routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients ≥ 70 years of age, with clinically node-negative, early stage, hormone receptor (HR) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) negative breast cancer in August 2016. Here, we assess the adherence to this recommendation in a Swiss university hospital.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single center cohort study from a prospectively maintained database. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with node-negative breast cancer were treated between 05/2011 and 03/2022. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients in the Choosing Wisely target group who underwent SLNB before and after the initiative went live. Statistical significance was tested using chi-squared test for categorical and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous variables.

RESULTS

In total, 586 patients met the inclusion criteria with a median follow-up of 2.7 years. Of these, 163 were ≥ 70 years of age and 79 were eligible for treatment according to the Choosing Wisely recommendations. There was a trend toward a higher rate of SLNB (92.7% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.07) after the Choosing Wisely recommendations were published. In patients ≥ 70 years with invasive disease, fewer received adjuvant radiotherapy after omission of SLNB (6.2% vs. 64.0%, p < 0.001), without differences concerning adjuvant systemic therapy. Both short-term and long-term complication rates after SLNB were low, without differences between elderly patients and those < 70 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Choosing Wisely recommendations did not result in a decreased use of SLNB in the elderly at a Swiss university hospital.

Use of imaging prediction model for omission of axillary surgery in early-stage breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To develop a prediction model incorporating clinicopathological information, US, and MRI to diagnose axillary lymph node (LN) metastasis with acceptable false negative rate (FNR) in patients with early stage, clinically node-negative breast cancers.

METHODS

In this single center retrospective study, the inclusion criteria comprised women with clinical T1 or T2 and N0 breast cancers who underwent preoperative US and MRI between January 2017 and July 2018. Patients were temporally divided into the development and validation cohorts. Clinicopathological information, US, and MRI findings were collected. Two prediction models (US model and combined US and MRI model) were created using logistic regression analysis from the development cohort. FNRs of the two models were compared using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

A total of 964 women comprised the development (603 women, 54 ± 11 years) and validation (361 women, 53 ± 10 years) cohorts with 107 (18%) and 77 (21%) axillary LN metastases in each cohort, respectively. The US model consisted of tumor size and morphology of LN on US. The combined US and MRI model consisted of asymmetry of LN number, long diameter of LN, tumor type, and multiplicity of breast cancers on MRI, in addition to tumor size and morphology of LN on US. The combined model showed significantly lower FNR than the US model in both development (5% vs. 32%, P < .001) and validation (9% vs. 35%, P < .001) cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our prediction model combining US and MRI characteristics of index cancer and LN lowered FNR compared to using US alone, and could potentially lead to avoid unnecessary SLNB in early stage, clinically node-negative breast cancers.

Omission of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer

Local treatment of the axilla in clinically node-negative (cN0) early breast cancer patients with routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is debated after publication of ACOSOG Z0011 data in 2010. Currently, prospective randomized surgical trials investigating the omission of SLNB in upfront breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and in the neoadjuvant setting, respectively. Several prospective randomized trials (SOUND, INSEMA, BOOG 2013-08, and NAUTILUS) with axillary observation alone versus SLNB in cN0 patients and primary BCS have primary objectives to evaluate oncologic safety when omitting SLNB. The Italian SOUND trial was the earliest to open in 2012 and has completed accrual in 2017. First oncologic outcome data are expected soon for SOUND and at the end of 2024 for INSEMA. Improvements in systemic treatments for breast cancer have increased the rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), offering the opportunity to de-escalate surgery in patients who have a pCR. Two prospective single-arm trials (EUBREAST-01, ASICS) include only patients with the highest likelihood of having a pCR after NAST (triple-negative or HER2-positive breast cancer) and type of surgery will be defined according to the response to NAST rather than on the classical T and N status. The ongoing trials will hopefully help us to understand whether we might take the best therapeutic decisions without the pathologic evaluation of nodal status.

Protocol for the postoperative radiotherapy in N1 breast cancer patients (PORT-N1) trial, a prospective multicenter, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of patients receiving breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy

Background

Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) could be useful for pN1 breast cancer patients who have undergone breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. However, the value of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for BCS patients, and the indications for post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for pN1 breast cancer mastectomy patients, have recently been challenged due to the absence of relevant trials in the era of modern systemic therapy. “PORT de-escalation” should be assessed in patients with pN1 breast cancer.

Methods

The PORT-N1 trial is a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial for patients with pN1 breast cancer that compares the outcomes of control [whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and RNI/PMRT] and experimental (WBI alone/no PMRT) groups. PORT-N1 aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of the experimental group by comparing 7-year disease-free survival rates with the control group. Female breast cancer patients with pT1-3 N1 status after BCS or mastectomy are eligible. Participants will be randomly assigned to the two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be stratified by surgery type (BCS vs. mastectomy) and histologic subtype (triple-negative vs. non-triple-negative). In patients who receive mastectomy, dissection of ≥5 nodes is required when there is one positive node, and axillary lymph node dissection when there are two or three positive nodes. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy are not eligible. RNI includes a “high-tangent” or wider irradiation field. This study will aim to recruit 1106 patients.

Discussion

The PORT-N1 trial aims to verify that PORT de-escalation after BCS or mastectomy is safe for pN1 breast cancer patients in terms of oncologic outcomes and capable of reducing toxicity rates. This trial will provide information crucial for designing PORT de-escalation strategies for patients with pN1 breast cancer.

Trial registration

This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05440149) on June 30, 2022.

Relationship Between Breast and Axillary Pathologic Complete Response According to Clinical Nodal Stage: A Nationwide Study From Korean Breast Cancer Society

Purpose

We evaluated the relationship between breast pathologic complete response (BpCR) and axillary pathologic complete response (ApCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) according to nodal burden at presentation. As the indications for NACT have expanded, clinicians have started clinical trials for the omission of surgery from the treatment plan in patients with excellent responses to NACT. However, the appropriate indications for axillary surgery omission after excellent NACT response remain unclear.

Methods

Data were collected from patients in the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry who underwent NACT followed by surgery between 2010 and 2020. We analyzed pathologic axillary nodal positivity after NACT according to BpCR stratified by tumor subtype in patients with cT1-3/N0-2 disease at diagnosis.

Results

A total of 6,597 patients were identified. Regarding cT stage, 528 (9.5%), 3,778 (67.8%), and 1,268 (22.7%) patients had cT1, cT2, and cT3 disease, respectively. Regarding cN stage, 1,539 (27.7%), 2,976 (53.6%), and 1,036 (18.7%) patients had cN0, cN1, and cN2 disease, respectively. BpCR occurred in 21.6% (n = 1,427) of patients, while ApCR and pathologic complete response (ypCR) occurred in 59.7% (n = 3,929) and ypCR 19.4% (n = 1,285) of patients, respectively. The distribution of biologic subtypes included 2,329 (39.3%) patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative disease, 1,122 (18.9%) with HR-positive/HER2-positive disease, 405 (6.8%) with HR-negative/HER2-positive disease, and 2,072 (35.0%) with triple-negative breast cancer . Among the patients with BpCR, 89.6% (1,122/1,252) had ApCR. Of those with cN0 disease, most (99.0%, 301/304) showed ApCR. Among patients with cN1-2 disease, 86.6% (821/948) had ApCR.

Conclusion

BpCR was highly correlated with ApCR after NACT. In patients with cN0 and BpCR, the risk of missing axillary nodal metastasis was low after NACT. Further research on axillary surgery omission in patients with cN0 disease is needed.