Advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) predicts prognosis of patients with gastric cancer after surgical resection

Evaluation of peripheral blood inflammation indexes as prognostic markers for colorectal cancer metastasis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of peripheral blood inflammation indexes in patients with metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC) and to establish a predictive scoring system. A total of 324 CRC patients diagnosed through pathological examination from January 2017 to July 2022 at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University were included. The prognosis of patients with metastatic CRC was examined, and the correlation between IL-10 expression in pathological tissues and IL-10 expression in serum was analyzed. The results showed that the prognosis of CRC was poorer when metastasis occurred (P < 0.001). Additionally, IL-10 was highly expressed in the metastatic CRC group (P = 0.018), and the expression of IL-10 in pathological tissues of patients with metastatic CRC was positively correlated with the expression of IL-10 in serum (P = 0.037). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-to-white blood cell ratio (LWR), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), and interleukin-10 (IL-10) were calculated and determined by ROC curve. The critical values were 2.135, 3.735, 353.745, 0.265, 1.025, 52.975, 353.635, and 11.25, respectively. Inflammatory indexes with an AUC of more than 0.6 were selected, and each colorectal cancer patient with any of these risk factors was assigned a score of one. The 324 patients were then divided into two groups: 0-4 for the low-risk group and 4-8 for the high-risk group. The occurrence of distant metastases in the two groups was statistically analyzed. The results showed that the OS and PFS of the low-risk group were significantly superior to those of the high-risk group (P < 0.05). These findings indicate that NLR, LWR, AISI, MLR, SIRI, PNI, ALI, and IL-10 are risk factors for distant metastasis in CRC patients. Therefore, the prediction scores of these indexes can be used to effectively evaluate the prognosis of patients with metastatic CRC.

Significance of preoperative evaluation of modified advanced lung cancer inflammation index for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Body composition and systemic inflammation/nutrition have been identified as important clinical factors in cancer patients. The modified advanced lung cancer inflammation index (mALI), which combines body composition and systemic inflammation/nutrition, is defined as appendicular skeletal muscle index × serum albumin/neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. This retrospective study aimed to investigate associations between preoperative mALI and surgical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

We examined 665 patients with resectable stage I-III NSCLC who underwent pulmonary resection. Patients were divided into low-mALI (n = 168) and high-mALI (n = 497) based on the lower quartile. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the prognostic value of mALI. We then performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for high- and low-mALI to further investigate impacts on survival.

RESULTS

Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were both significantly poorer in the low-mALI group than in the high-mALI group (58.2% vs. 79.6%, P < 0.001; 48.8% vs. 66.7%, P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed low-mALI as an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.116; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.458-3.070; P < 0.001) and RFS (HR, 1.634; 95% CI 1.210-2.207; P = 0.001). After PSM, low-mALI remained as an independent predictor of OS (HR, 2.446; 95% CI 1.263-4.738; P = 0.008) and RFS (HR 1.835; 95% CI 1.074-3.137; P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative mALI appears to offer an independent predictor of poor surgical outcomes as a simple, routinely available, and inexpensive biomarker in patients with resectable NSCLC.

The Prognostic Value of Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).A total of 586 ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over 65 years old between January 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups by the optimal cutoff value of ALI. Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between ALI and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Cox survival analysis, and Kaplan Meier curves were used to assess the predictive value of ALI for MACEs.Spearman's nonparametric test revealed a moderate correlation between ALI and the GRACE (r: -0.417, P < 0.001). Time-dependent ROC curves showed that the area under the curve for ALI was 0.751 (95% CI, 0.699-0.798) in predicting MACEs, higher than Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (0.531, 95% CI 0.435-0.627) and Prognostic Nutritional Index (0.590, 95% CI 0.505-0.676), and for combined diagnostic models (ALI + GRACE) was 0.913, (95% CI 0.875 - 0.942, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that ALI (HR: 0.974, 95% CI: 0.952-0.996, P = 0.017) was an independent risk factor for MACEs. Kaplan Meier survival analysis showed that the cumulative incidence of MACEs was significantly higher in elderly ACS patients with lower ALI (log-rank test, P < 0.001).ALI could be a nutrition-inflammation indicator with independent predictive value for long-term MACEs of elderly ACS patients after PCI.

Association between the advanced lung cancer inflammation index and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with RA: Insights from NHANES data analysis

Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with significant mortality, which is primarily due to cardiovascular complications. Despite advancements in RA treatment, mortality rates remain high, highlighting the need for reliable prognostic markers. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI), which integrates inflammatory and nutritional biomarkers, has shown promise in predicting outcomes in various medical conditions. However, its role in RA prognosis remains unclear.

Methods

This study aimed to investigate the associations between the ALI and all-cause mortality, as well as cardiovascular mortality, in RA patients using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). A total of 1568 RA patients were included, and the ALI was calculated using body mass index (BMI), serum ALB, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. Comprehensive demographic, lifestyle, and metabolic data from the NHANES enabled adjustments for potential confounders. Multivariate Cox regression and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the associations between the ALI and mortality outcomes.

Results

Our findings demonstrate an inverse association between the ALI and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in RA patients. Furthermore, a nonlinear relationship was observed, with mortality risk increasing significantly below a certain ALI threshold. Stratified analyses revealed a protective effect of the ALI across various demographic and clinical subgroups, underscoring its potential as a prognostic marker in patients with RA.

Conclusion

The ALI holds promise as a valuable prognostic marker for identifying high-risk individuals and guiding personalized management strategies for patients with RA. However, further validation in prospective studies is warranted to confirm its clinical utility. Nonetheless, the potential implications of the ALI for improving the prognosis of patients with RA underscore the importance of its continued investigation in clinical practice.

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index is associated with mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

There is still a very high morbidity and mortality rate for patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) has been demonstrated to be associated with the prognosis in multiple types of cancers. Like in cancer, systemic chronic low-grade inflammation is one of the distinguishing features of PD patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationships between the ALI and all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in PD patients.

METHODS

Patients who started PD at Shaoxing People's Hospital between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2020 (n = 277) were recruited and followed up until 1 July 2023. They were divided into high-ALI group and low-ALI group according to the median of ALI. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to assess the associations between the ALI and all-cause and CVD mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to determine the predictive power of the ALI for all- cause and CVD mortality.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 40.50 months (interquartile range, 26.42-59.77 months), a total of 55 patients died, 31 of whom died due to CVD. Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that patients in the low-ALI group had significantly lower cumulative and cardiovascular cumulative survival rates than did those in the high-ALI group (all P < 0.001). After we corrected for confounders, the risk of all-cause and CVD mortality was significantly greater in the low-ALI group than in the high-ALI group [hazard ratio (HR) 1.944, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.068-3.540, P = 0.030, and HR 2.672, 95% CI 1.188-6.009, P = 0.017, respectively]. The predictive value of ALI (AUC = 0.708, 95% CI 0.630-0.786, P < 0.001) for all-cause mortality was superior to albumin (AUC = 0.644, 95% CI 0.556-0.726, P < 0.001), body mass index (AUC = 0.581, 95% CI 0.496-0.659, P = 0.069) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (AUC = 0.675, 95% CI 0.596-0.754, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A lower ALI is an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in PD patients. The ALI may be an effective indicator for predicting outcomes in PD patients.

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) predicted the postoperative survival rate of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and the construction of a nomogram model

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in patients with operable non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). By constructing the nomogram model, it can provide a reference for clinical work.

METHODS

A total of 899 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgery in our hospital between January 2017 and June 2021 were retrospectively included. ALI was calculated by body mass index (BMI) × serum albumin/neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The optimal truncation value of ALI was obtained using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and divided into two groups. Survival analysis was represented by the Kaplan-Meier curve. The predictors of Overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the Cox proportional risk model using single factor and stepwise regression multifactor analysis. Based on the results of multi-factor Cox proportional risk regression analysis, a nomogram model was established using the R survival package. The bootstrap method (repeated sampling 1 000 times) was used for internal verification of the nomogram model. The concordance index (C-index) was used to represent the prediction performance of the nomogram model, and the calibration graph method was used to visually represent its prediction conformity. The application value of the model was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off value of ALI was 70.06, and the low ALI group (ALI < 70.06) showed a poor survival prognosis. In multivariate analyses, tumor location, pathological stage, neuroaggression, and ALI were independently associated with operable NSCLC-specific survival. The C index of OS predicted by the nomogram model was 0.928 (95% CI: 0.904-0.952). The bootstrap self-sampling method (B = 1000) was used for internal validation of the prediction model, and the calibration curve showed good agreement between the prediction and observation results of 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS. The ROC curves for 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival were plotted according to independent factors, and the AUC was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.925-0.979), 0.951 (95% CI: 0.916-0.985), and 0.939 (95% CI: 0.913-0.965), respectively. DCA shows that this model has good clinical application value.

CONCLUSION

ALI can be used as a reliable indicator to evaluate the prognosis of patients with operable NSCLC, and through the construction of a nomogram model, it can facilitate better individualized treatment and prognosis assessment.

Development and validation of an inflammatory biomarkers model to predict gastric cancer prognosis: a multi-center cohort study in China

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory factors have increasingly become a more cost-effective prognostic indicator for gastric cancer (GC). The goal of this study was to develop a prognostic score system for gastric cancer patients based on inflammatory indicators.

METHODS

Patients' baseline characteristics and anthropometric measures were used as predictors, and independently screened by multiple machine learning(ML) algorithms. We constructed risk scores to predict overall survival in the training cohort and tested risk scores in the validation. The predictors selected by the model were used in multivariate Cox regression analysis and developed a nomogram to predict the individual survival of GC patients.

RESULTS

A 13-variable adaptive boost machine (ADA) model mainly comprising tumor stage and inflammation indices was selected in a wide variety of machine learning models. The ADA model performed well in predicting survival in the validation set (AUC = 0.751; 95% CI: 0.698, 0.803). Patients in the study were split into two sets - "high-risk" and "low-risk" based on 0.42, the cut-off value of the risk score. We plotted the survival curves using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

CONCLUSION

The proposed model performed well in predicting the prognosis of GC patients and could help clinicians apply management strategies for better prognostic outcomes for patients.

A propensity‑matched analysis of the prognostic value of advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with gastric cancer after curative resection

The prognostic significance of inflammation, immune response and nutritional status in patients with cancer is well-documented. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) has emerged as a novel prognostic indicator, reflecting both inflammation and nutritional status. This study aimed to assess the prognostic relevance of preoperative ALI in patients with gastric cancer (GC). Data of 459 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for GC between December 2013 and November 2017 at the Kanagawa Cancer Center (Yokohama, Japan) were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative ALI was calculated from blood tests. Patients were divided into the high- and low-ALI groups. This study investigated the association between preoperative ALI, clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) after propensity-matched analysis. Comparative analysis revealed that patients in the low-ALI group tended to be older, were predominantly female, had lower body mass index and had a higher incidence of lymphatic invasion compared with those in the high-ALI group before propensity-matched analysis. Notably, the low-ALI group exhibited significantly reduced OS and RFS post-gastrectomy (85.5% vs. 93.8%, P=0.01; and 82.1% vs. 91.8%, P=0.02, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified low ALI as an independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS. In conclusion, preoperative ALI could provide a valuable prognostic tool for patients with GC undergoing curative resection, offering insights into patient survival outcomes based on their inflammatory and nutritional status.

Prognostic value of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: a propensity-score matching cohort study and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Insufficient evidence existed about the prognostic role of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) for gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection. The aim of this study was to identify the predictive ability of ALI for survival after curative gastrectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 328 gastric cancer patients who received curative gastrectomy from the database of Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, and investigated the prognostic role of the preoperative ALI compared with clinicopathological variables and other serum biomarkers, such as preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and Lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR). To minimize intergroup differences, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was employed. Additionally, we performed a meta-analysis of four cohort studies published up to October 2023 following the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

In the overall cohort, patients in the low ALI group had a significantly worse overall survival compared to those in the high ALI group (P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis identified that ALI maintained its prognostic significance across different subgroups. In addition, ROC analysis showed that ALI had a higher AUC value for 3-year overall survival compared to NLR, PLR, and LMR (0.576 vs. 0.573 vs. 0.557 vs. 0.557). Multivariate analysis indicated that ALI, other than other serum biomarkers, was an independent risk factor for decreased overall survival in GC patients following curative surgery (HR = 1.449; 95%CI: 1.028-2.045; P = 0.034). Consistently, PSM analysis supported all of these findings. The meta-analysis including 4 studies evaluating 2542 patients, confirmed the association between the low ALI and poor survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The preoperative ALI was an independent prognostic factor for survival in gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy.

Clinical significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) undergoing definite chemo-radiotherapy (CRT). We included 87 patients with LS-SCLC from South Korea, treated between 2005 and 2019 with definite CRT. ALI was calculated using body mass index, serum albumin, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio. We categorized 38 patients into the high ALI group (ALI ≥ 44.3) and 48 into the low ALI group (ALI < 44.3). Patients in the high ALI group exhibited longer overall survival (OS) than patients in the low ALI group. In multivariate analysis, prophylactic cranial irradiation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.366, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.66, P = 0.0008), and high ALI (HR = 0.475, 95% CI 0.27-0.84, P = 0.0103) were identified as independent prognostic factors for predicting better OS. Notably, a high ALI score was particularly indicative of longer survival in patients treated with the combination of etoposide and cisplatin. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that a high pretreatment ALI was significantly associated with better OS in patients with LS-SCLC undergoing definite CRT. This suggests that ALI could be a useful tool for predicting prognosis and guiding chemotherapy regimen selections in clinical practice for LS-SCLC.

Combined influence of nutritional and inflammatory status and depressive symptoms on mortality among US cancer survivors: Findings from the NHANES

BACKGROUND

Inflammation and nutrition and depression are interrelated, and both are related to changes in mortality rates. We investigated the association of nutritional and inflammation index or depressive symptoms with the risk of all-cause mortality or cause-specific mortality among cancer survivors.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of a nationally representative sample of cancer survivors, aged 40 years or older (n = 2331; weighted population, 15 248 255; 67.6 ± 11.0 years; 50.6 % males), were recruited from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2005 to 2018. Advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) reflected inflammation and nutritional status and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) demonstrated depressive symptoms. The independent and joint associations of ALI and PHQ-9 score with mortality outcomes were examined among cancer survivors and Cox regression analysis based on weights was used to calculate the relative risk.

RESULTS

We identified 605 all-cause deaths (cancer, 204; non-cancer, 401) over a median of 6.2 years of follow-up (15,385 person-years; interquartile range, 3.3-9.8 years). High ALI was observed to be consistently associated with lower risks of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR], 0.516; 95 % CI, 0.400-0.667) and non-cancer (HR, 0.414; 95 % CI, 0.291-0.588) mortality compared with low ALI in a series of adjusted models. Meanwhile, lower PHQ-9 score (0-4) was associated with lower risks of all-cause (HR, 0.686; 95 % CI, 0.521-0.903) and non-cancer (HR, 0.686; 95 % CI, 0.474-0.992) mortality compared with higher PHQ-9 score (≥10). Furthermore, joint analyses showed that high ALI was associated with a decreased risk of death among cancer survivors who were not depressive. Specifically, survivors with high ALI but not depressive symptoms had the lowest overall (HR, 0.404; 95 % CI, 0.228-0.715) risks.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort study, we observed impact of nutritional and inflammatory status and depressive symptoms on mortality among cancer survivors, with the lowest risks of death from both all causes and non-cancer being noted among the combination of high level ALI with no depression.

The predictive value of advanced lung cancer inflammation index for short-term outcomes and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) for short-term outcomes and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who underwent radical surgery.

METHODS

CRC patients who underwent radical resection were included from Jan 2011 to Jan 2020 in our single clinical centre. Short-term outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared in different groups. Cox analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors for OS and DFS.

RESULTS

A total of 4010 patients who underwent radical CRC surgery were enrolled in the current study. As a result, the low ALI group had longer operation time (p = 0.02), more intra-operative blood loss (p < 0.01), longer postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.01), and more overall complications (p < 0.01). Moreover, ALI (p < 0.01, OR = 0.679, 95% CI = 0.578-0.798) was an independent risk factor for overall complications. As for survival, the low ALI group had worse OS in all TNM stages (p < 0.01), stage II (p < 0.01) and stage III (p < 0.01). Similarly, the low ALI group had worse DFS in all TNM stages (p < 0.01), stage II (p < 0.01), and stage III (p < 0.01). In Cox analysis, ALI was an independent risk factors for OS (p < 0.01, HR = 0.707, 95% CI = 0.589-0.849) and DFS (p < 0.01, HR = 0.732, 95% CI = 0.622-0.861).

CONCLUSION

Lower ALI was associated with more postoperative complications, worse OS, and DFS for CRC patients who underwent radical surgery. Furthermore, ALI was an independent risk factor for overall complications, OS, and DFS. Surgeons should pay close attention to patients with low ALI before surgery and make clinical strategies cautiously.

Prognostic value of nutritional and inflammatory markers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors

The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has provided a new treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, further evaluation is needed for determining biomarkers for the use of ICIs. The present study evaluated the prognostic value of certain nutritional and inflammatory markers in patients with HCC who received ICIs. In the present study, the clinical data of 151 patients with HCC who received ICIs at Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were collected. The blood parameters of all patients before treatment were collected to evaluate certain nutritional and inflammatory markers, including the prognostic nutrition index (PNI), nutritional risk index (NRI), geriatric NRI (GNRI), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI). Patients were grouped using the cut-off value calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and the relationship between these biomarkers and prognosis was evaluated through survival analysis. Furthermore, the prognostic value of these biomarkers was assessed through multivariate Cox regression analysis and construction of nomograms. Finally, time-ROC curves were plotted to compare the differences in predicting prognosis between the biomarkers. In the preliminary survival analysis, all inflammatory and nutritional markers included in the present study were significantly associated with the prognosis of HCC in patients who received ICIs. Similar results were obtained in a subgroup analysis of patients with different Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that GNRI, PNI, BCLC stage and Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) stage were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS), whereas GNRI, BCLC stage and TNM stage were also significantly associated with overall survival (OS). Furthermore, the time-ROC curves indicated that nutritional indicators had a higher prognostic value in all indexes, especially GNRI. The C-index (95% confidence interval) of the nomograms for predicting the survival probability of patients who received ICIs were 0.801 (0.746-0.877) and 0.823 (0.761-0.898) for PFS and overall OS, respectively, which also showed high accuracy. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that PNI, GNRI, NRI, SII, SIRI and ALI were all related to the efficacy of ICIs in HCC and could serve as non-invasive biomarkers for ICI treatment effectiveness. Moreover, compared with inflammatory markers, nutritional markers had greater predictive ability, with GNRI being the biomarker with the best prognostic value.

Peripheral blood nutrient indices as biomarkers for anti‑PD‑1 therapy efficacy and prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer

Immunotherapy offers survival benefits for patients with advanced gastric cancer, but not all populations can benefit from immunotherapy. Good nutritional status is fundamental to a patient's immune function and may have an impact on the efficacy of immunotherapy. The present study aimed to investigate changes in prognostic nutritional index (PNI), advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) and albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) values before and after immunotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. The study also aimed to determine the potential association of the aforementioned values with patient outcomes and prognosis. Body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, total protein, peripheral blood lymphocyte, neutrophil, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen19-9 (CA19-9) and a-fetoprotein (AFP) data were collected from 195 patients with advanced gastric cancer who underwent immunotherapy from January 2020 to October 2021. In addition, PNI, ALI and AGR values were calculated based on variables in blood collected from the patients within 3 days prior to immunotherapy and 3 weeks after immunotherapy. The results demonstrated that low PNI was associated with elevated CEA levels. Moreover, low ALI levels were associated with reduced BMI levels, elevated AFP levels, PD-L1 negative and first-line treatment. Comparison of responding and non-responding groups revealed that patients who responded to immunotherapy had higher PNI and AGR values than patients who did not respond, both before and after treatment, but had lower CEA and CA19-9 levels after treatment. Furthermore, in the non-responding group, PNI and AGR values were decreased and CEA values were increased following treatment compared with those prior to treatment. The objective response and disease control rates were higher in the high PNI and AGR groups compared with the low PNI and AGR groups, respectively. Moreover, PNI and AGR were found to be independent predictors of the short-term efficacy of immunotherapy for advanced gastric cancer, with cut-off values of 47.18 and 1.29, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that ALI was associated with the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients, while multivariate analysis demonstrated that baseline PNI and AGR were independent predictors of PFS. In conclusion, tumor progression leads to a decline in the nutritional level of patients, and the present study indicated that effective immunotherapy may alleviate this deterioration to a certain extent. Furthermore, PNI and AGR exhibit potential in predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy and the prognosis of patients with advanced gastric cancer, and may exhibit potential as biomarkers in clinical practice.

Clinical significance of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in gastrointestinal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) has been identified as a scientific and clinical priority in multiple malignancies. The aim of this study is to investigate the value of the ALI before treatment in evaluating postoperative complications (POCs) and survival outcomes in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.

Methods

Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase and Web of Science were comprehensively reviewed up to June 2022. The endpoints were POCs and survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also performed.

Results

Eleven studies including 4417 participants were included. A significant heterogeneity in the ALI cut-off value among studies was observed. Patients in the low ALI group showed increased incidence of POCs (OR=2.02; 95%CI:1.60-2.57; P<0.001; I² = 0%). In addition, a low ALI was also significantly associated with worse overall survival (HR=1.96; 95%CI: 1.58-2.43; P<0.001; I² = 64%), which remained consistent in all subgroups based on country, sample size, tumor site, tumor stage, selection method and Newcastle Ottawa Scale score. Moreover, patients in the low ALI group had an obviously decreased disease-free survival compared to these in the high ALI group (HR=1.47; 95%CI: 1.28-1.68; P<0.001; I² = 0%).

Conclusion

Based on existing evidence, the ALI could act as a valuable predictor of POCs and long-term outcomes in patients with GI cancer. However, the heterogeneity in the ALI cut-off value among studies should be considered when interpreting these findings.

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index is a prognostic factor for gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) is a comprehensive assessment indicator that can reflect inflammation and nutrition conditions. However, there are some controversies about whether ALI is an independent prognostic factor for gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. Thus, we aimed to clarify its prognostic value and explore the potential mechanisms.

METHODS

Four databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CNKI were used for searching eligible studies from inception to June 28, 2022. All gastrointestinal cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC), gastric cancer (GC), esophageal cancer (EC), liver cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and pancreatic cancer were enrolled for analysis. We focused on prognosis most in the current meta-analysis. Survival indicators, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-special survival (CSS) were compared between the high ALI group and the low ALI group. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was submitted as a supplementary document.

RESULTS

We finally included fourteen studies involving 5091 patients in this meta-analysis. After pooling the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), ALI was found to be an independent prognostic factor for both OS (HR = 2.09, I² = 92%, 95% CI = 1.53 to 2.85, P < 0.01), DFS (HR = 1.48, I² = 83%, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.87, P < 0.01), and CSS (HR = 1.28, I² = 1%, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.60, P = 0.03) in gastrointestinal cancer. After subgroup analysis, we found that ALI was still closely related to OS for CRC (HR = 2.26, I² = 93%, 95% CI = 1.53 to 3.32, P < 0.01) and GC (HR = 1.51, I² = 40%, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.04, P = 0.006) patients. As for DFS, ALI also has a predictive value on the prognosis of CRC (HR = 1.54, I² = 85%, 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.07, P = 0.005) and GC (HR = 1.37, I² = 0%, 95% CI = 1.09 to 1.73, P = 0.007) patients.

CONCLUSION

ALI affected gastrointestinal cancer patients in terms of OS, DFS, and CSS. Meanwhile, ALI was a prognostic factor both for CRC and GC patients after subgroup analysis. Patients with low ALI had poorer prognoses. We recommended that surgeons should perform aggressive interventions in patients with low ALI before the operation.

The prognostic value of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index in patients with gastrointestinal malignancy

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation is crucial for the development and progression of cancers. The advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) is considered to be a better indicator of systemic inflammation than current biomarkers. However, the prognostic value of the ALI in gastrointestinal neoplasms remains unclear. We performed the first meta-analysis to explore the association between ALI and gastrointestinal oncologic outcomes to help physicians better evaluate the prognosis of those patients.

METHODS

Eligible articles were retrieved using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar by December 29, 2022. Clinical outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 18 articles with 6898 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that a low ALI was correlated with poor OS (HR = 1.914, 95% CI: 1.514-2.419, P < 0.001), DFS (HR = 1.631, 95% CI: 1.197-2.224, P = 0.002), and PFS (HR = 1.679, 95% CI: 1.073-2.628, P = 0.023) of patients with gastrointestinal cancers. Subgroup analysis revealed that a low ALI was associated with shorter OS (HR = 2.279, 95% CI: 1.769-2.935, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 1.631, 95% CI: 1.197-2.224, P = 0.002), and PFS (HR = 1.911, 95% CI: 1.517-2.408, P = 0.002) of patients with colorectal cancer. However, the ALI was not related to CSS in the patients with gastrointestinal malignancy (HR = 1.121, 95% CI: 0.694-1.812, P = 0.640). Sensitivity analysis supported the stability and dependability of the above results.

CONCLUSION

The pre-treatment ALI was a useful predictor of prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancers.