1
|
Sorokin M, Garazha A, Suntsova M, Tkachev V, Poddubskaya E, Gaifullin N, Sushinskaya T, Lantsov D, Borisov V, Naskhletashvili D, Ilyin K, Seryakov A, Glusker A, Moisseev A, Buzdin A. Prospective trial of the Oncobox platform RNA sequencing bioinformatic analysis for personalized prescription of targeted drugs. Comput Biol Med 2025; 187:109716. [PMID: 39884056 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.109716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 02/01/2025]
Abstract
Interrogating gene expression in tumor can identify up- and downregulated molecular targets of cancer drugs. Here we report the results of prospective clinical investigation of using RNA sequencing analysis for personalized cancer therapy. Transcriptomic profiles were analyzed using Oncobox platform that identifies altered expression of drug target genes and molecular pathways and builds a personalized rating of targeted therapeutics. Totally, 239 adult solid cancer patients were enrolled: 135 received cancer drug therapy, others received palliative treatment or radiotherapy, or died before therapy started. Oncobox recommended drugs were prescribed in 59 % of the cases receiving therapy. Otherwise, patients received non-targeted therapy or targeted therapy predicted as inefficient by Oncobox (controls). Patients in the Oncobox group were significantly pre-treated compared to controls, but we observed a longer progression-free survival (PFS) trend in the Oncobox group. Furthermore, post-hoc analysis revealed that time between biopsy collection and tumor profiling significantly impacts Oncobox predictive capacity. Excluding patient cases with biopsy obtained more than 7 months before sequencing lead to a significant difference in PFS between Oncobox and control groups with hazard ratio of 0.45 (p-value = 0.023). These results suggest that transcriptomic profiling provides clinically relevant therapeutic match and can improve disease control rate in solid cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maksim Sorokin
- OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, 91789, USA; Oncobox Ltd., Moscow, Russia; Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119146, Russia.
| | - Andrew Garazha
- OmicsWay Corp., Walnut, CA, 91789, USA; Oncobox Ltd., Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Suntsova
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119146, Russia
| | | | - Elena Poddubskaya
- Vitamed Oncological Clinical Center, Moscow, 121309, Russia; World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | - Dmitriy Lantsov
- Kaluga Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensary, 248007, Russia
| | | | | | - Kirill Ilyin
- Medical Holding SM-Clinic, 105120, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Alex Glusker
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119146, Russia
| | - Alexey Moisseev
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, 119146, Russia
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Oncobox Ltd., Moscow, Russia; World-Class Research Center "Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare", Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, 117997, Russia; PathoBiology Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poddubskaya E, Suntsova M, Lyadova M, Luppov D, Guryanova A, Lyadov V, Garazha A, Sorokin M, Semenova A, Shatalov V, Biakhova M, Simonov A, Moisseev A, Buzdin A. Biomarkers of success of anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer derived from RNA- and whole-exome sequencing: results of a prospective observational study on a cohort of 85 patients. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1493877. [PMID: 39723204 PMCID: PMC11669362 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1493877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment have shown high efficacy for about 15 cancer types. However, this therapy is only effective in 20-30% of cancer patients. Thus, the precise biomarkers of ICI response are an urgent need. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of the prognostic potential ofseveral existing and putative biomarkers of response to immunotherapy in acohort of 85 patients with lung cancer (LC) receiving PD-1 or PD-L1 targeted ICIs. Tumor biosamples were obtained prior to ICI treatment and profiled by whole exome and RNA sequencing. The entire 403 putative biomarkers were screened, including tumor mutation burden (TMB) and number of cancer neoantigens, 131 specific HLA alleles, homozygous state of 11 HLA alleles and their superfamilies; four gene mutation biomarkers, expression of 45 immune checkpoint genes and closely related genes, and three previously published diagnostic gene signatures; for the first time, activation levels of 188 molecular pathways containing immune checkpoint genes and activation levels of 19 pathways algorithmically generated using a human interactome model centered around immune checkpoint genes. Treatment outcomes and/or progression-free survival (PFS) times were available for 61 of 85 patients with LC, including 24 patients with adenocarcinoma and 27 patients with squamous cell LC, whose samples were further analyzed. For the rest 24 patients, both treatment outcomes and PFS data could not be collected. Of these, 54 patients were treated with PD1-specific and 7 patients with PD-L1-specific ICIs. We evaluated the potential of biomarkers based on PFS and RECIST treatment response data. Results In our sample, 45 biomarkers were statistically significantly associated with PFS and 44 with response to treatment, of which eight were shared. Five of these (CD3G and NCAM1 gene expression levels, and levels of activation of Adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes, Growth hormone signaling, and Endothelin molecular pathways) were used in our signature that showed an AUC of 0.73 and HR of 0.27 (p=0.00034) on the experimental dataset. This signature was also reliable (AUC 0.76, 0.87) for the independent publicly available LC datasets GSE207422, GSE126044 annotated with ICI response data and demonstrated same survival trends on independent dataset GSE135222 annotated with PFS data. In both experimental and one independent datasets annotated with samples' histotypes, the signature worked better for lung adenocarcinoma than for squamous cell LC. Conclusion The high reliability of our signature to predict response and PFS after ICI treatment was demonstrated using experimental and 3 independent datasets. Additionally, annotated molecular profiles obtained in this study were made publicly accessible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Poddubskaya
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Vitamed Clinic, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Suntsova
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Marina Lyadova
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Daniil Luppov
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Department of Molecular Genetic Research, Endocrinology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia Guryanova
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Vladimir Lyadov
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
- Branch Campus of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Further Professional Education «Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education» of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Novokuznetsk, Russia, Novokuznetsk, Russia
| | | | - Maksim Sorokin
- Department of Molecular Genetic Research, Endocrinology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Research, Oncobox Ltd., Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory for Genomic Analysis of Cell Signaling Systems, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna Semenova
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vitaly Shatalov
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Biakhova
- Oncology Center No. 1, Moscow City Hospital Named after S. S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Simonov
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Aleksey Moisseev
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Molecular Genetic Research, Endocrinology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Translational Genomic Bioinformatic, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Laboratory for Genomic Analysis of Cell Signaling Systems, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia
- PathoBiology Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Modestov A, Zolotovskaia M, Suntsova M, Zakharova G, Seryakov A, Jovcevska I, Mlakar J, Poddubskaya E, Moisseev A, Vykhodtsev G, Roumiantsev S, Sorokin M, Tkachev V, Simonov A, Buzdin A. Bioinformatic and clinical experimental assay uncovers resistance and susceptibility mechanisms of human glioblastomas to temozolomide and identifies new combined and individual survival biomarkers outperforming MGMT promoter methylation. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2024; 16:17588359241292269. [PMID: 39525666 PMCID: PMC11544758 DOI: 10.1177/17588359241292269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and lethal central nervous system (CNS) tumor. The treatment strategy is mainly surgery and/or radiation therapy, both combined with adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. Historically, methylation of MGMT gene promoter is used as the major biomarker predicting individual tumor response to TMZ. Objectives This research aimed to analyze genes and molecular pathways of DNA repair as biomarkers for sensitivity to TMZ treatment in GBM using updated The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and validate the results on experimental datasets. Methods Survival analysis of GBM patients under TMZ therapy and hazard ratio (HR) calculation were used to assess all putative biomarkers on World Health Organization CNS5 reclassified TCGA project collection of molecular profiles and experimental multicenter GBM patient cohort. Pathway activation levels were calculated for 38 DNA repair pathways. TMZ sensitivity pathway was reconstructed using a human interactome model built using pairwise interactions extracted from 51,672 human molecular pathways. Results We found that expression/activation levels of seven and six emerging gene/pathway biomarkers served as high-quality positive (HR < 0.61) and negative (HR > 1.63), respectively, patient survival biomarkers performing better than MGMT methylation. Positive survival biomarkers were enriched in the processes of ATM-dependent checkpoint activation and cell cycle arrest whereas negative-in excision DNA repair. We also built and characterized gene pathways which were informative for GBM patient survival following TMZ administration (HR 0.18-0.44, p < 0.0009; area under the curve 0.68-0.9). Conclusion In this study, a comprehensive analysis of the expression of 361 DNA repair genes and activation levels of 38 DNA repair pathways revealed 13 potential survival biomarkers with increased prognostic potential compared to MGMT methylation. We algorithmically reconstructed the TMZ sensitivity pathway with strong predictive capacity in GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marianna Zolotovskaia
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Endocrinology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
- Moscow Center for Advanced Studies, Moscow, Russia
| | - Maria Suntsova
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Endocrinology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Galina Zakharova
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Ivana Jovcevska
- Medical Centre for Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jernej Mlakar
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Aleksey Moisseev
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Endocrinology Research Center, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anton Buzdin
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russia
- Endocrinology Research Center, Dmitriya Ulyanova Str. 11, Moscow 117036, Russia
- Moscow Center for Advanced Studies, Kulakova Str. 20, Moscow, Russia
- Oncobox LLC, Moscow 119991, Russia
- Shemyakin–Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow 117997, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al-Khazraji Y, Muzammil MA, Javid S, Tangella AV, Gohil NV, Saifullah H, Kanagala SG, Fariha F, Muneer A, Ahmed S, Shariq A. Novel regimens and treatment strategies in neoadjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2024; 18:43-58. [PMID: 39282125 PMCID: PMC11393386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this systematic review was to describe novel regimens and treatment strategies in neoadjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim was to summarize the current advancements in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for CRC, including the use of cytotoxic drugs, targeted treatments, and immunotherapy. The analysis aimed to provide insights into the potential benefits and drawbacks of these novel approaches and highlight the need for further research to optimize NACT use in CRC and improve patient outcomes. Methods From October 20, 2023, to December 10, 2023, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, and Scopus. Studies addressing the use of and treatment strategies for CRC and neoadjuvant therapies were included. Screening was conducted in two steps, initially by title and abstract and then by full-text articles. English-language articles were considered, while preprints, non-English publications, and articles published as grey literature were excluded from the study. A total of 85 studies were selected for further analysis after screening and filtering. Results After filtering out duplicates and items that were irrelevant to our research query from the initial database search's 510 results, 397 unique articles were found. Eighty-five studies were chosen for additional analysis after the articles underwent two rounds of screening. Conclusion The review concluded that neoadjuvant therapy for CRC has evolved beyond conventional approaches and holds promise for improving patient outcomes. Future prospects for advancing neoadjuvant approaches are promising, with ongoing clinical trials investigating the refinement of strategies, identification of predictive biomarkers, and optimization of patient selection. The adoption of novel regimens, precision medicine, and immunotherapy offers opportunities to redefine treatment paradigms and enhance patient care in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Saman Javid
- Department of Medicine, CMH Kharian Medical College, Kharian, Pakistan
| | | | - Namra Vinay Gohil
- Department of Medicine, Medical College Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
| | - Hanya Saifullah
- Department of Medicine, Medical College Baroda, CMH Lahore Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan
| | | | - Fnu Fariha
- Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Asim Muneer
- Department of Adult Hematology Oncology, Prince Faisal Ca ncer Centre Buraidah, Al qaseem, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sumaira Ahmed
- Department of Gastroenterology, King Fahad Hospital, Burydah, KSA
| | - Ali Shariq
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shaban N, Kamashev D, Emelianova A, Buzdin A. Targeted Inhibitors of EGFR: Structure, Biology, Biomarkers, and Clinical Applications. Cells 2023; 13:47. [PMID: 38201251 PMCID: PMC10778338 DOI: 10.3390/cells13010047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Members of the EGFR family of tyrosine kinase receptors are major regulators of cellular proliferation, differentiation, and survival. In humans, abnormal activation of EGFR is associated with the development and progression of many cancer types, which makes it an attractive target for molecular-guided therapy. Two classes of EGFR-targeted cancer therapeutics include monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which bind to the extracellular domain of EGFR, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which mostly target the intracellular part of EGFR and inhibit its activity in molecular signaling. While EGFR-specific mAbs and three generations of TKIs have demonstrated clinical efficacy in various settings, molecular evolution of tumors leads to apparent and sometimes inevitable resistance to current therapeutics, which highlights the need for deeper research in this field. Here, we tried to provide a comprehensive and systematic overview of the rationale, molecular mechanisms, and clinical significance of the current EGFR-targeting drugs, highlighting potential candidate molecules in development. We summarized the underlying mechanisms of resistance and available personalized predictive approaches that may lead to improved efficacy of EGFR-targeted therapies. We also discuss recent developments and the use of specific therapeutic strategies, such as multi-targeting agents and combination therapies, for overcoming cancer resistance to EGFR-specific drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Shaban
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow 117997, Russia; (D.K.); (A.B.)
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny 141701, Russia
| | - Dmitri Kamashev
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow 117997, Russia; (D.K.); (A.B.)
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny 141701, Russia
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russia
| | - Aleksandra Emelianova
- World-Class Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russia;
| | - Anton Buzdin
- Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow 117997, Russia; (D.K.); (A.B.)
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny 141701, Russia
- Institute of Personalized Oncology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow 119991, Russia
- PathoBiology Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ding M, Yan J, Chao G, Zhang S. Application of artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening by colonoscopy: Future prospects (Review). Oncol Rep 2023; 50:199. [PMID: 37772392 DOI: 10.3892/or.2023.8636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has become a severe global health concern, with the third‑high incidence and second‑high mortality rate of all cancers. The burden of CRC is expected to surge to 60% by 2030. Fortunately, effective early evidence‑based screening could significantly reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. Colonoscopy is the core screening method for CRC with high popularity and accuracy. Yet, the accuracy of colonoscopy in CRC screening is related to the experience and state of operating physicians. It is challenging to maintain the high CRC diagnostic rate of colonoscopy. Artificial intelligence (AI)‑assisted colonoscopy will compensate for the above shortcomings and improve the accuracy, efficiency, and quality of colonoscopy screening. The unique advantages of AI, such as the continuous advancement of high‑performance computing capabilities and innovative deep‑learning architectures, which hugely impact the control of colorectal cancer morbidity and mortality expectancy, highlight its role in colonoscopy screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Menglu Ding
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (The Xin Hua Hospital of Zhejiang Province), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, P.R. China
| | - Junbin Yan
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (The Xin Hua Hospital of Zhejiang Province), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, P.R. China
| | - Guanqun Chao
- Department of General Practice, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, P.R. China
| | - Shuo Zhang
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (The Xin Hua Hospital of Zhejiang Province), Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310000, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zolotovskaia M, Kovalenko M, Pugacheva P, Tkachev V, Simonov A, Sorokin M, Seryakov A, Garazha A, Gaifullin N, Sekacheva M, Zakharova G, Buzdin AA. Algorithmically Reconstructed Molecular Pathways as the New Generation of Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers in Human Solid Cancers. Proteomes 2023; 11:26. [PMID: 37755705 PMCID: PMC10535530 DOI: 10.3390/proteomes11030026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Individual gene expression and molecular pathway activation profiles were shown to be effective biomarkers in many cancers. Here, we used the human interactome model to algorithmically build 7470 molecular pathways centered around individual gene products. We assessed their associations with tumor type and survival in comparison with the previous generation of molecular pathway biomarkers (3022 "classical" pathways) and with the RNA transcripts or proteomic profiles of individual genes, for 8141 and 1117 samples, respectively. For all analytes in RNA and proteomic data, respectively, we found a total of 7441 and 7343 potential biomarker associations for gene-centric pathways, 3020 and 2950 for classical pathways, and 24,349 and 6742 for individual genes. Overall, the percentage of RNA biomarkers was statistically significantly higher for both types of pathways than for individual genes (p < 0.05). In turn, both types of pathways showed comparable performance. The percentage of cancer-type-specific biomarkers was comparable between proteomic and transcriptomic levels, but the proportion of survival biomarkers was dramatically lower for proteomic data. Thus, we conclude that pathway activation level is the advanced type of biomarker for RNA and proteomic data, and momentary algorithmic computer building of pathways is a new credible alternative to time-consuming hypothesis-driven manual pathway curation and reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Zolotovskaia
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Omicsway Corp., Walnut, CA 91789, USA
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia
| | - Maks Kovalenko
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | - Polina Pugacheva
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia
| | | | - Alexander Simonov
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Omicsway Corp., Walnut, CA 91789, USA
| | - Maxim Sorokin
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia
- PathoBiology Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | - Nurshat Gaifullin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
| | - Marina Sekacheva
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia
| | - Galina Zakharova
- Laboratory of Clinical and Genomic Bioinformatics, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia
| | - Anton A. Buzdin
- Laboratory for Translational Genomic Bioinformatics, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), 141701 Dolgoprudny, Russia
- PathoBiology Group, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- World-Class Research Center “Digital Biodesign and Personalized Healthcare”, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119048 Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Systems Biology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|