Correlation between short- and long-term effects of intravitreal ranibizumab therapy on macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion: a prospective observational study

Which Explanatory Variables Contribute to the Classification of Good Visual Acuity over Time in Patients with Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion with Macular Edema Using Machine Learning?

This study’s goal is to determine the accuracy of a linear classifier that predicts the prognosis of patients with macular edema (ME) due to a branch retinal vein occlusion during the maintenance phase of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. The classifier was created using the clinical information and optical coherence tomographic (OCT) findings obtained up to the time of the first resolution of ME. In total, 66 eyes of 66 patients received an initial intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF followed by repeated injections with the pro re nata (PRN) regimen for 12 months. The patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without good vision during the PRN phase. The mean AUC of the classifier was 0.93, and the coefficients of the explanatory variables were: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline was 0.66, BCVA at first resolution of ME was 0.51, age was 0.21, the average brightness of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) was −0.12, the intactness of the external limiting membrane (ELM) was −0.14, the average brightness of the ELM was −0.17, the brightness value of EZ was −0.17, the area of the outer segments of the photoreceptors was −0.20, and the intactness of the EZ was −0.24. This algorithm predicted the prognosis over time for individual patients during the PRN phase.

Treatment Landscape of Macular Disorders in Indian Patients with the Advent of Razumab™ (World's First Biosimilar Ranibizumab): A Comprehensive Review

Ranibizumab is approved for the treatment of several macular disorders, including wet age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and myopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV), among others. The unaffordability of the innovator ranibizumab among patients from developing countries such as India led to the development of the world’s first biosimilar ranibizumab, which is a cost-effective alternative that does not compromise efficacy and safety. Razumab™, developed and produced by Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India, is the world’s first biosimilar of ranibizumab, and is approved in India for the treatment of various macular disorders, including wet AMD, DME, RVO and mCNV. The efficacy and safety of Razumab for the treatment of these macular disorders have been evaluated in both prospective and real-world retrospective studies. Razumab has shown an efficacy similar to that of the innovator ranibizumab, achieving improved visual acuity, as measured by the best corrected visual acuity, and reduction in the central macular thickness, leading to improved patient outcomes. The safety profile of Razumab is comparable to that of the innovator ranibizumab and is well tolerated without any new safety concerns. Here, we review the clinical and real-world data of Razumab in the treatment of macular disorders.

Optical coherence tomographic patterns in patients with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema treated by ranibizumab: a predictive and personalized approach

Purpose

To establish the morphological and functional parameters to predict the effectiveness of intravitreal injections (IVI) of ranibizumab in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion and to develop a mathematical model for personalized treatment algorithms.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective study of 98 patients (98 eyes) with macular edema, who received IVI of ranibizumab and were followed up for 12 months. Spectral optical coherence tomography scans and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessments were conducted every 3 months. Treatment outcome predictors were calculated based on logistic regression analysis.

Results

The most significant prognostic factors for the long-term BCVA were baseline BCVA (OR 11.1, p = 0.001), foveal volume (OR 10.8, p = 0.001), destruction of external limiting membrane (OR 15.8, p = 0.001), photoreceptor inner/outer segments (OR 11.1, p = 0.001) and retinal pigment epithelium (OR 9.1, p = 0.001). It has also been discovered that post-treatment BCVA correlated with the height of serous retinal detachment (SRD) (r = -0.4, p = 0.001), ganglion cell complex thickness (r =  + 0.3, p = 0.01) and focal loss of ganglion cells (r =-0.3, p = 0.005). Patients without SRD required fewer ranibizumab injections (3.8 ± 1.1) for macular edema fluid resorption compared to those with SRD (5.7 ± 1.2, p = 0.03). A mathematical model for predicting and personalized approach therapy of ranibizumab has been obtained (accuracy of 89%).

Conclusion

The effectiveness of IVI of ranibizumab depends on baseline morphological and functional changes. The obtained mathematical model allows for predicting the outcomes of therapy, determining individualized algorithms to increase the treatment effectiveness and to prevent low vision that corresponds to the principles of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.

Ocular microcirculation changes, measured with laser speckle flowgraphy and optical coherence tomography angiography, in branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema treated by ranibizumab

PURPOSE

This study searched for early predictive vascular biomarkers for visual outcomes in eyes with macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVOME).

METHODS

Twenty-four eyes of 24 subjects with BRVOME were treated with the intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) for at least 6 months. We measured mean blur rate (MBR) in the optic nerve head (ONH) and vessel density (VD) in the macula with laser speckle flowgraphy and optical coherence tomography angiography, respectively.

RESULTS

Six-month post-IVR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was correlated positively with age, pre-IVR BCVA, 1-month post-IVR BCVA, 3-month post-IVR BCVA and pre-IVR systolic blood pressure (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively) and negatively with pre-IVR overall MBR, 1-month post-IVR overall MBR, 6-month post-IVR overall MBR, 3-month post-IVR deep retinal capillary plexus (DCP) VD and 6-month post-IVR DCP VD (P = 0.03, P = 0.03, P = 0.02, P = 0.01 and P = 0.005, respectively). Furthermore, a multiple regression analysis showed that pre-IVR overall MBR (β =  - 0.67, P = 0.009) was among independent prognostic factors predicting 6-month post-IVR BCVA. Six-month post-IVR DCP VD was also correlated with overall MBR at all time points.

CONCLUSION

ONH blood flow may be a pre-IVR biomarker of both visual outcomes and post-IVR deep macular microcirculation in eyes with BRVOME.

A Multicenter, Retrospective Study (RE-ENACT 2) on Razumab™ (World's First Biosimilar Ranibizumab) in Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose

The REal life assessmENt of safety And effeCTiveness of Razumab 2 (RE-ENACT 2) study evaluated the long-term effectiveness of biosimilar ranibizumab. We present the subgroup analysis of patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods

Data of patients who received pro re nata (PRN) biosimilar ranibizumab (November 2015 to December 2018, 17 centers) were analyzed. Endpoints were change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA, Snellen’s/logMAR), central subfield thickness (CSFT), intraocular pressure (IOP), and proportions of patients having intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 30, 36, and 48.

Results

Of 101 patients, 48.51% were men, and the majority (79.21%) were treatment naïve and had received 3 (range 1–5) injections (53.5%). Significant improvements (P < 0.05) were observed from baseline to all timepoints for BCVA [baseline, 0.89 ± 0.06 (n = 94); week 48, 0.41 ± 0.08 (n = 14)] and CSFT [baseline, 527.58 ± 19.9 (n = 85); week 48, 307.47 ± 16.4 (n = 15)]. Changes in IOP (mmHg) were non-significant [baseline, 15.38 ± 0.4 (n = 94); week 48, 13.94 ± 0.6 (n = 16); P = 0.5575). Proportions of patients having IRF [baseline, 71.3% (n = 84) vs week 48, 0% (n = 15)] and SRF [baseline, 52.5% (n = 83) vs week 48, 0% (n = 15)] were decreased. Similar results for BCVA, CSFT, IOP, IRF, and SRF were observed for BRVO and CRVO subgroups. There were no new safety concerns.

Conclusions

Biosimilar ranibizumab demonstrated improvements in visual acuity and disease outcomes up to 48 weeks in patients with RVO without any new safety concerns.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40123-020-00277-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Impact and Implication of Fovea-Involving Intraretinal Hemorrhage after Acute Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with (group A) or without (group B) fovea-involving intraretinal hemorrhage (IRH).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients diagnosed with acute, treatment-naive BRVO seen by the Duke Eye Center Retina Service from January 1, 2009, through June 30, 2017 who had treatment-naive BRVO with disease onset <3 months before presentation, macular involvement, spectral-domain OCT and color fundus photographs at presentation, and >12 months offollow-up.

METHODS

Retrospective study using a database of patients diagnosed with BRVO over an 8-year period. The presence of fovea-involving IRH was determined from baseline fundus photographs by human graders and confirmed with multimodal imaging. Presenting features, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity (VA), cystoid macular edema (CME), central subfield thickness (CST), and number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.

RESULTS

Of 172 patients with BRVO, 33 (19.2%) presented with fovea-involving IRH. At presentation, group A had worse VA (0.54±0.06 logMAR [Snellen equivalent, 20/69] vs. 0.34±0.03 logMAR [Snellen equivalent, 20/44]; P = 0.001), greater CST (523.8±32 μm vs. 345.9±11.8 μm; P < 0.001), were more likely to have CME (93.9% vs. 48.2%; P < 0.001), and received more anti-VEGF injections in the first year (4.50±3.43 vs. 1.89±3.26; P < 0.001) than group B. Final VA was worse in group A (0.57±0.12 logMAR [Snellen equivalent, 20/74] vs. 0.35±0.05 logMAR [Snellen equivalent, 20/45]; P = 0.05). More patients in group A had loss of >2 lines of VA (36.4% vs. 18.7%; P = 0.04) or >3 lines (27.3% vs. 10.8%; P = 0.05) at final follow-up. Group A was more likely to have CME (63.6% vs. 27.3%; P < 0.001) at final follow-up with greater treatment burden, yet experienced a greater decrease in CST (-197.8±45.3 μm vs. -51.7±14.7 μm; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute BRVO presenting with fovea-involving IRH is associated with worse presenting features, greater treatment burden, and worse clinical outcomes despite current therapeutic interventions.

Short-term effect of intravitreal conbercept injection on major and macular branch retinal vein occlusion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal conbercept injection on major and macular branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis involved 43 patients with BRVO (major BRVO n = 24; macular BRVO, n = 19) who were diagnosed by fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA) and injected with intravitreal conbercept. The following outcomes were measured at baseline and follow-up (1-6 months): best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), total retinal volume in a 6-mm diameter section of the macula, choroidal thickness under the central fovea of the macula, relative area of retinal hemorrhage, complications, and times when repeated injection was performed.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of BCVA, CFT, and total retinal volume in a 6-mm diameter section of the macula at 6 months after treatment. Choroidal thickness under the central fovea of the macula and relative area of retinal hemorrhage showed no significant differences between the two groups at 6 months after treatment; however, they significantly differed from baseline measurements.

CONCLUSION

In general, intravitreal injection of conbercept may have a better short-term effect in patients with macular BRVO than in patients with major BRVO.

Real-Life Clinical Effectiveness of Razumab® (the World's First Biosimilar of Ranibizumab) in Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Subgroup Analysis of the Pooled Retrospective RE-ENACT Study

BACKGROUND

This subgroup analysis of the RE-ENACT study evaluates the effectiveness of Razumab® (the world's first biosimilar of ranibizumab by Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd.) in Indian patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

The data on patients with RVO who had received ≥3 injections of Razumab® between January and August 2016 were analyzed. Endpoints were: improvement in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and a decrease in central macular thickness (CMT), intraretinal fluid (IRF), and subretinal fluid (SRF) from baseline at weeks 4, 8, and 12.

RESULTS

Of 160 patients, the majority (61.87%) were men. The mean (±SE) BCVA improved from baseline (0.76 ± 0.04) to week 4 (0.73 ± 0.03; p = 0.0656), which attained significance at week 8 (0.55 ± 0.02; p < 0.0001) and week 12 (0.47 ± 0.02; p < 0.0001). The mean (±SE) CMT significantly decreased from baseline (447.60 ± 10.91 μm) to week 4 (431.84 ± 10.92 μm; p = 0.0028), week 8 (339.28 ± 8.12 μm; p < 0.0001), and week 12 (298.23 ± 6.68 μm; p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with IRF and SRF significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased from baseline to weeks 4, 8, and 12 (IRF: from 70.63 to 45.63, 39.38, and 30.00%, respectively; SRF: from 65.63 to 37.50, 28.13, and 24.38%, respectively). A subgroup analysis of branch RVO and central RVO showed similar results. No new safety concerns were observed.

CONCLUSION

Razumab® (biosimilar of ranibizumab) effectively improved visual acuity and disease outcomes in patients with RVO in a real-world setting with no new safety concerns.