Short-term changes in and preoperative factors affecting vaulting after posterior chamber phakic Implantable Collamer Lens implantation

The comparison of white-to-white via triple person-times caliper measuring and machine-measuring in V4c implantable collamer lens implantation

This study aimed to compare the differences and characteristics of white-to-white (WTW) values obtained before V4c implantation using triple person-times caliper, IOL-Master 700, Pentacam HR, and UBM, and to assess their correlation with vaulting. A total of 930 myopia patients (1842 eyes) who were interested in undergoing ICL surgery were assessed before the procedure using various instruments. The WTW measurements were obtained using a triple person-times caliper, Pentacam HR, and IOL-Master 700, whereas the angle-to-angle (ATA) measurements were obtained using UBM. The size of the ICL was subsequently calculated using triple person-times caliper measurements. The vault of the ICL was assessed using Pentacam HR three months after the surgery. The WTW was determined to be 11.30 ± 0.29 mm, 11.43 ± 0.29 mm, and11.86 ± 0.38 mm, respectively, using the triple person-times caliper, Pentacam HR, and IOL-Master 700. The measurement of ATA was 11.57 ± 0.51 mm, as done by UBM. The ICL vault was measured to be 400.97 ± 198.46 µm when examined with Pentacam HR three monthsafter the procedure. The linear regression analyses of ICL size and WTW of triple person-times caliper, ICL vault and WTW were (R = 0.703, p < 0.001; R = 0.0969, p < 0.001) respectively. The highest correlation was found between IOL-Master and Pentacam HR (r = 0.766, p = 0.000). The lowest correlation was found between UBM and Pentacam HR (r = 0.358, p = 0.002). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were the triple person-times caliper and Pentacam HR (- 0.573, 0.298) and the triple person-times caliper and UBM (- 1.15, - 0.605). This indicated a strong agreement between the triple person-times caliper and Pentacam HR and a lack of agreement between the triple person-times caliper and UBM. Triple person-times caliper measurements offer excellent maneuverability, practicality, and reliable outcomes for determining ICL vaults. Measurements obtained using the triple-person caliper were less differece than those obtained using the Pentacam HR.

Vault changes in eyes with a vertically implanted implantable collamer lens

Sulcus-to-sulcus vertical diameter is longer than the horizontal. However, the effect of vertical positioning of the implantable collamer lens (ICL) on the vault compared to preoperative prediction is unclear. This prospective consecutive case series aimed to examine postoperative and preoperative predicted vaults during vertical ICL fixation. This study assessed 180 right eyes in 180 patients with myopic astigmatism. For the 90 eyes in 90 patients who underwent horizontal fixation (horizontal group) and 90 eyes in 90 patients who underwent vertical fixation (vertical group), biometrics by three-dimensional tomography of the anterior segment optical coherence tomography (A-OCT) was performed before surgery and 2 h, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The anterior chamber depth did not change over time in both groups, and there was no significant difference from preoperative values. The postoperative vault values were significantly lower in the vertical group than in horizontal group over time. The difference between vault measurements and preoperative predictions at all postoperative time points was significantly greater in the vertical group than in horizontal group. Vertical fixation of the ICL reduced the vault by > 100 μm compared with horizontal fixation, which was different from the A-OCT preoperative predicted value.

Predicting Implantable Collamer Lens Vault Using Machine Learning Based on Various Preoperative Biometric Factors

Purpose

To predict the vault size after Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) V4c implantation using machine learning methods and to compare the predicted vault with the conventional manufacturer's nomogram.

Methods

This study included 707 patients (707 eyes) who underwent ICL V4c implantation at the Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, from September 2019 to January 2022. Random Forest Regression (RFR), XGBoost, and linear regression (LR) were used to predict the vault size 1 week after ICL V4c implantation. The mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), root mean square error (RMSE), symmetric mean absolute percentage error (SMAPE), and Bland-Altman plot were utilized to compare the prediction performance of these machine learning methods.

Results

The dataset was divided into a training set of 180 patients (180 eyes) and a test set of 527 patients (527 eyes). XGBoost had the lowest prediction error, with mean MAE, RMSE, and SMAPE values of 121.70 µm, 148.87 µm, and 19.13%, respectively. The Bland‒Altman plots of RFR and XGBoost showed better prediction consistency than LR. However, XGBoost showed narrower 95% limits of agreement (LoA) than RFR, ranging from -307.12 to 256.59 µm.

Conclusions

XGBoost demonstrated better predictive performance than RFR and LR, as it had the lowest prediction error and the narrowest 95% LoA. Machine learning may be applicable for vault prediction, and it might be helpful for reducing the complications and the secondary surgery rate.

Translational Relevance

Using the proposed machine learning model, surgeons can consider the postoperative vault to reduce the surgical complications.

Efficacy and Safety of Implantable Collamer Lens V4c Implantation in 1,834 Myopic Eyes for 1 Year of Follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate visual outcomes of patients with myopia after EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) implantation and predict risk factors of postoperative vault abnormalities.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective analysis, 1,834 eyes of 926 patients with myopia who underwent EVO ICL implantation were recruited between 2020 and 2021. Patients were followed up for 1 year, during which surgery outcomes were evaluated. In addition, 31 eyes with vault abnormalities who underwent secondary surgery were enrolled to form a generalized linear model, which aimed to predict risk factors contributing to vault abnormalities.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up visit, safety and efficacy indexes were 1.12 ± 0.17 and 1.10 ± 0.19, respectively, and there was no statistical significance between the low and high myopia groups. Furthermore, 79.18% of eyes achieved a residual spherical equivalent within ±0.50 diopters. Except for the temporary elevation of intraocular pressure at 1 week postoperatively, IOP and endothelial cell density remained stable during follow-up visits. The rate of postoperative adverse events was 21.97% and most adverse events were transient. Vault abnormalities accounted for the majority of complications (9.54%). Results of generalized linear model showed that age was a risk factor for postoperative vault abnormalities, and the anterior chamber depth served as a protective factor (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Visual outcomes of EVO ICL implantation were satisfactory in safety and efficacy indexes in both the low and high myopia groups for 1 year of follow-up, with acceptable stability in postoperative spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure, and endothelial cell density. This study emphasized cautious ICL size selection for older patients and those with shallow anterior chamber depth. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(10):694-704.].

A new formula based on new parameters for predicting postoperative vault after posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation: a retrospective study

Background

To investigate the parameters influencing vault after posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation, thereby establishing a formula to predict the vault after operation.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 61 patients (122 eyes) who underwent implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation were enrolled consecutively from the Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, China, between August 2020 and October 2021. Comprehensive optometry, axial length, curvature, anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), white-to-white distance (WTW), corneal thickness, sulcus-to-sulcus distance (STS), the distance between the sulcus-to-sulcus plane and the anterior crystalline lens surface (STSL), ciliary-to-ciliary distance (CTC) and the distance between the ciliary-to-ciliary plane and the anterior crystalline lens surface (CTCL) were recorded preoperatively. The vault was measured by ultrasound biomicroscopy at 1 month after operation. The correlation among vault, preoperative parameters and ICL size was analyzed. The accuracy and reliability of the prediction formula were verified by analyzing the postoperative correlation coefficient of actual and predicted vaults of the contralateral eye and through the Bland-Altman consistency test.

Results

Parameters significantly influencing the vault at 1 month after operation are ACD (r=0.260, P=0.004), LT (r=-0.338, P<0.001), WTW (r=0.240, P=0.03), STSL (r=-0.394, P<0.001), CTC (r=-0.199, P=0.03), CTCL (r=-0.328, P<0.001), ICL size (r=0.224, P=0.01) and ICL power (r=-0.231, P=0.01). The regression formula was as follows: vault (mm) = -2.179 - 0.227 * CTC (vertical) - 0.783 * CTCL (mean) + 0.472 * ICL size (fitting R=0.853, R2=0.727, adjusted R2=0.705). The predicted vault was 0.50±0.18 mm, and the actual vault was 0.56±0.24 mm. The Bland-Altman scatter plot showed a satisfactory agreement between actual and predicted vaults (-0.06 mm, 95% limits of agreement: -0.45 to 0.32 mm).

Conclusions

ACD, LT, WTW, STSL, CTC, CTCL, ICL size and ICL power were the factors affecting vault after ICL implantation. The prediction formula with the new parameter CTCL was accurate and reliable.

Prediction of Implantable Collamer Lens Vault Based on Preoperative Biometric Factors and Lens Parameters

PURPOSE

To establish and validate the accuracy of implantable collamer lens (ICL) vault size prediction formula based on preoperative biometric factors and lens parameters.

METHODS

This study included 300 patients (300 eyes) with Visian ICL V4c (STAAR Surgical) implantation. They were randomly divided into the formula establishment group and formula validation group. Anterior segment measurements, ICL V4c size and power, and vault 1 week postoperatively were collected from all patients. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to establish the prediction formula. Mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland-Altman diagrams were used to evaluate the prediction formula.

RESULTS

Anterior chamber depth (ACD) had the greatest influence on vault 1 week after ICL V4c implantation, followed by ICL V4c size and angle-to-angle distance (ATA). The prediction formula was obtained according to the partial regression coefficient, which was vault (mm) = -1.279 + 0.291 × ACD (mm) + 0.210 × ICL V4c size (mm) - 0.144 × ATA (mm) (R² = 0.661). In the formula validation group, the mean predictive vault, MAE, MedAE, and RMSE were 628.10, 135.09, 130.42, and 150.46 µm, respectively. The Bland-Altman diagram showed the predictive vault was in good agreement with the actual vault.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel ICL V4c vault prediction formula was developed and shown to be an effective method for predicting the vault to reduce surgical complications. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(5):332-339.].

A Case of a Low Vault after Posterior Chamber Acrylic Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation

When implanting a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL), it is crucial to maintain a safe distance. The patient was a 29-year-old man with high-degree bilateral myopia. In February 2021, posterior chamber acrylic pIOLs (Eyecryl Phakic TORIC; Biotech Vision Care, Gujarat, India) were implanted in both his eyes. After the surgery, the right eye vault was 6 μm, and the left eye vault was 350 μm. Moreover, the internal anterior chamber depth values were 2,270 and 2,220 μm for the right and left eyes, respectively. In our case, we found a fairly high crystalline lens rise (CLR) in both eyes, but it was greater in the right eye. The CLR value was +455 in the right eye and +350 in the left eye. In our patient, anterior segment anatomical parameters were higher in the right eye than in the left eye, and a greater pIOL length was calculated for the right eye, but the vault was very low. In our opinion, this was associated with the high CLR in the right eye. If an even larger pIOL had been implanted, there would have been a greater narrowing of the anterior chamber angle. This case would be contraindicated if those parameters were considered in selecting the indications and determination of the pIOL length.

Short-term clinic observation of misalignment and rotational stability after implantable collamer lens implantation

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate misalignment (tilt and decentration) and rotational stability of the implantable collamer lens V4c 6 months after implantation and to explore the potential risk factors associated with postoperative misalignment and rotation.

METHODS

A total of 36 eyes of 36 patients with high myopia and myopic astigmatism who underwent implantable collamer lens V4c implantation were included in this study. Tilt, decentration, and rotation of the implantable collamer lens were assessed postoperatively at l week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Correlation analysis was used to identify the potential risk factors for implantable collamer lens tilt, decentration, and rotation at 6 months postoperatively. Higher-order aberration was measured to evaluate the effect of implantable collamer lens misalignment on visual quality at pupil diameters of 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm.

RESULTS

The tilt and decentration at the last follow-up were 2.43 ± 1.35° and 0.278 ± 0.160 mm, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between tilt and decentration (r = 0.31, P = 0.046). No significant correlation was detected between implantable collamer lens decentration and internal higher-order aberrations (P > 0.05). The degree of implantable collamer lens rotation (3.11 ± 2.00°) was significantly associated with the vault (r =  - 0.422, P = 0.01), while it was positively associated with the preoperative anterior chamber depth (r = 0.36, P = 0.034). No significant correlation was found between postoperative astigmatism and rotation (r =  - 0.07, P = 0.351).

CONCLUSIONS

The implantable collamer lens V4c provides relatively stable misalignment and rotation after implantation. The ICL lens vault is a potential risk factor for postoperative implantable collamer lens rotation. The absolute value of decentration and tilt was relatively small, which showed no correlation with internal higher-order aberration in short-term observation.

Validation of the vault prediction model based on the sulcus-to-sulcus diameter and lens thickness: a 925-eye prospective study

BACKGROUND

To verify the accuracy and stability of the prediction formula based on the ciliary sulcus diameter and lens thickness and to analyse factors influencing the prediction results.

METHODS

In total, 925 eyes from 506 subjects were enrolled in this prospective study between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021. Subjects were divided into four seasons, each spanning three months. The target vault was set to be between 300 μm and 700 μm according the prediction formula. The actual vault was measured one month postoperatively. The Bland-Altman test, 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) were used to evaluate the agreement between the predicted vault and the actual vault. Eyes with absolute prediction errors greater than 300 μm were further analysed.

RESULTS

The mean predicted vaults for the four seasons were 503 ± 99, 494 ± 96, 481 ± 92 and 502 ± 93 μm, while the mean actual vaults were 531 ± 189, 491 ± 179, 464 ± 179 and 529 ± 162 μm, respectively. The predicted and actual vaults of the overall subjects were 493 ± 95 and 500 ± 180 μm, respectively. Of the 925 eyes, 861 eyes (93.08%), 42 eyes (4.54%), and 22 eyes (2.38%) showed a normal vault, high vault, and low vault, respectively. Bland-Altman plots showed that the mean difference between the actual vault and predicted vault overall (± 95% LoA) was 6.43 ± 176.2 μm (-339 to 352 μm). Three UBM features may lead to large prediction errors (more than 300 μm): wide iris-ciliary angle (ICA), iris concavity and anteriorly positioned ciliary body.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the accuracy and stability of the prediction formula through the validation of a large sample size and a long time span. Wide ICA, iris concavity and anteriorly positioned ciliary body may have an effect on vault.

Immediate or Delayed Sequential Bilateral ICL Surgery: a Survey of Chinese Ophthalmologists

INTRODUCTION

In China, the demand for implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery is booming. Immediate sequential bilateral ICL surgery (ISBICLS) benefits patients and clinics, but it remains controversial and lacks standardization. We aim to investigate the prevalence of, factors for, and surgeon attitudes toward ISBICLS.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional survey study, an electronic questionnaire about the practice and attitudes toward performing ISBICLS or delayed sequential bilateral ICL surgery (DSBICLS) was distributed to 792 qualified ICL surgeons in Mainland China, between 4 April and 22 April 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 531 surgeons (66.79%) from 30 provinces in Mainland China responded. Among them, 374 (67.23%) were currently performing ISBICLS. Fifty-two percent (277) of surgeons reported performing ISBICLS more than 50% of the time, while 85.05% of surgeons chose to perform the second eye surgery 1 day after the first eye surgery. Seventy percent (248) of surgeons performing ISBICLS chose to perform the second eye surgery less than 30 min after the first eye surgery. Surgeons who started ICL surgery earlier (before 2010, OR = 2.772, 95% CI = 1.290-5.957, P = 0.009; 2011-2013, OR = 2.479, 95% CI = 1.060-5.800, P = 0.036), completed one-eye ICL surgery faster (< 3 min, OR = 3.936, 95% CI = 1.505-10.293, P = 0.005) and modified the second eye ICL selection less frequently (1-25%, OR = 0.203, 95% CI = 0.054-0.771, P = 0.019; 26-50%, OR = 0.173, 95% CI = 0.041-0.726, P = 0.017; 51-75%, OR = 0.299, 95% CI = 0.041-0.726, P = 0.123; 76-100%, OR = 0.163, 95% CI = 0.039-0.688, P = 0.014) tended to perform ISBICLS. No significant association was found among clinical settings, preoperative measurement devices, and hospital policies with performing ISBICLS. Regarding their attitudes toward ISBICLS, 54.63% preferred ISBICLS and 45.37% preferred DSBICLS. The main supporting reasons were patient convenience (98.64%), faster vision rehabilitation (73.56%), and improved perioperative compliance (73.22%). The concerns regarding ISBICLS included the risk of endophthalmitis (62.22%), lack of recommendation in expert consensus (61.67%), and decreased vault predictability (60.93%). The most common desires for further adoption were expert consensus on surgical criteria and patient indicators for ISBICLS (82.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

ISBICLS has been gradually adopted in Mainland China, but has not been widely accepted as a routine procedure. Surgeons' experience and skills mainly influence whether ISBICLS is performed. Further research is needed to explore standardized protocols to prevent endophthalmitis, the appropriate time interval of two eye surgery, and requisitions for surgeon skills.

Analysis of perioperative problems related to intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation

PURPOSE

To introduce a modified procedure of ICL implantation, to summarize the perioperative problems and their corresponding treatment after myopia correction with Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL), and to compare the difference of complications between the no-hole ICL and hole ICL.

METHODS

We searched all articles on ICL-related perioperative problems and their corresponding treatment in Scopus, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases for the last 22 years.

RESULTS

ICL implantation is safe, effective, stable and predictable in the correction of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism, but can also cause a series of perioperative problems, including intraoperative and postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

There are many kinds of complications related to ICL, but the common intraoperative and postoperative complications mainly include abnormality of arch height, abnormal position of ICL, loss of corneal endothelial cells and corneal decompensation, high intraocular pressure and secondary glaucoma, cataract and night vision symptoms. Compared with ICL without central pore, the incidence of complications such as loss of corneal endothelial cells and corneal decompensation, high intraocular pressure and secondary glaucoma and cataract was relatively lower in central hole ICL, while postoperative complications such as night vision symptoms were obvious.

Inter-eye and postoperative prediction of vault after implantation of EVO + Visian phakic implantable collamer lens

PURPOSE

To assess whether the postoperative outcomes of the implantation of an EVO + implantable collamer lens (ICL) in one eye can be used as a predictor of the vault of the fellow eye, and to evaluate the vault changes of the implantation in both eyes during the postoperative period.

METHODS

A prospective study including 40 eyes of 20 patients with a bilateral EVO + ICL implantation was performed. Subjects were evaluated before the surgery and 1 day, 1 week and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Central vault was assessed using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The inter-eye and follow-up analyses were performed using lineal models and the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

The vault of the first implanted eye at the 1-day visit highly predicts the vault of the second eye (R² = .87; P < .001); the mean inter-eye difference was - 0.95 μm, and the superior and inferior limits of agreement were -50.27 μm and 148.37 μm, respectively. This relationship was maintained during the medium-term follow-up, not finding differences in the slopes among visits (P ≥ .09). A progressive decrease of vault was found during the follow-up (P < .001). Larger vault change 6 months after the surgery was associated with higher vault 1 day after the ICL implantation (R² = .19;P = .005).

CONCLUSION

One-day postoperative vault in the first eye can help to predict the optimal ICL sizing in the second eye. Vault tends to decrease during the first 6 months after EVO + ICL implantation. Eyes with higher initial vaults will also show larger reductions during the medium-term follow-up.

A prediction model for sulcus-to-sulcus diameter in myopic eyes: a 1466-sample retrospective study

Background

To establish and verify the accuracy and reliability of a sulcus-to-sulcus diameter (STS) prediction model.

Methods

In this retrospective study, the prediction formula was established with the data from 1466 eyes from 733 subjects from July 2020 to April 2021 and verified with the data from 278 eyes from 139 subjects between May 2021 and June 2021. Each subject was measured with a Pentacam, IOLMaster 700, OPD-Scan III, and ultrasound biomicroscope. The prediction formulas were established with multiple linear regression, and intergroup correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland–Altman tests were used to assess the agreement between the predicted and actual STS (actual STS was measured by UBM).

Results

The explanatory variables relevant to the horizontal STS (STSH) were the Pentacam white-to-white diameter (WTWP; standardized partial regression coefficient [β] = 0.330; p < 0.001), the flat K value (β = -0.211; p < 0.001), and the anterior corneal diameter (ACD) (β = 0.178; p < 0.001). The corresponding multiple regression equation was : STSH (mm) = 8.061 + 0.510 × WTWP − 0.090 × Flat K value + 0.430 × ACD. The explanatory variables relevant to the vertical STS (STSV) were the WTWP (β = 0.435; p < 0.001), the steep K value (β = -0.271; p < 0.001), and the ACD (β = 0.187; p < 0.001). The corresponding multiple regression equation was : STSV (mm) = 8.540 + 0.492 × WTWP − 0.075 × Steep K value + 0.329 × ACD. The bias of the predicted to the actual STSH was − 0.021, with 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) from − 0.499 to 0.457. The bias of the predicted to the actual STSV was 0.057, with 95% LoA from − 0.462 to 0.575. The ICC was 0.883 between the predicted and actual STSH and 0.859 between the predicted and actual STSV.

Conclusions

The Pentacam-measured WTW, the K value and the ACD are important for predicting the STS diameter. The prediction model has good accuracy and reliability.

Trial registration

Not applicable.

Clinical Prediction of Inadequate Vault in Eyes With Thick Lens After Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation Using Iris Morphology

Background

Obtaining an ideal vault is crucial in the implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery. Prediction of the vault value is difficult since it requires the integration of multiple factors. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the iris shape and vault value in eyes with thick lens.

Methods

The study was conducted in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Patients who received ICL V4c between 2017 and 2021 were screened. Eyes with thick lens (>4.0 mm) and abnormal iris shape (concave or convex) were included. The preoperative biometric parameters and postoperative vault value were compared between eyes with concave shape group and convex shape group. The relationship between various factors and vault was assessed by spearman rank analysis and multiple linear regression analysis. Representative cases our strategies to deal with the abnormal vault were demonstrated.

Results

Twenty eight eyes of 14 patients with thick lens and concave or convex shape iris were eventually included, with 14 eyes of 7 patients in group 1 (concave shape iris) and the other 14 eyes of 7 patients in group 2 (convex shape iris). The mean vault of group 1 was (0.16 ± 0.07) mm, which was significantly lower than (0.88 ± 0.13) mm in group 2. Multiple linear regression analysis showed iris shape (P < 0.001) was only the explanatory variables associated with the postoperative vault. In group1, 4 eyes showed extremely large ACA, requiring a secondary surgical intervention. So all of them underwent ICL exchange for a larger ICL. In group2, the ICL was implanted in a vertical or oblique position to avoid or rescue an extremely large vault.

Conclusion

Concave shape iris had a higher risk of low vault and convex shape iris were more likely to demonstrate high vault in eyes with thick lens. Exchanging ICL for the larger size and adjusting ICL to the vertical or oblique orientation are good option to rescue the low or high vault, respectively.