Expert consensus on the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy

Neurotrophic keratopathy: General features and new therapies

Neurotrophic keratopathy is an uncommon degenerative corneal disorder characterized by compromised corneal sensory innervation resulting in the formation of epithelial defects and nonhealing corneal ulcers. Various treatment modalities are available to stabilize disease progression, improve patient well-being, and prevent vision loss. For eligible patients, medical and surgical reinnervation have emerged as pioneering therapies, holding promise for better management. We present a comprehensive review of the disorder, providing an update relevant to ophthalmologists on pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment options, and novel therapies targeting pathophysiological pathways.

Herpes simplex keratitis: A brief clinical overview

The aim of our minireview is to provide a brief overview of the diagnosis, clinical aspects, treatment options, management, and current literature available regarding herpes simplex keratitis (HSK). This type of corneal viral infection is caused by the herpes simplex virus (HSV), which can affect several tissues, including the cornea. One significant aspect of HSK is its potential to cause recurrent episodes of inflammation and damage to the cornea. After the initial infection, the HSV can establish a latent infection in the trigeminal ganglion, a nerve cluster near the eye. The virus may remain dormant for extended periods. Periodic reactivation of the virus can occur, leading to recurrent episodes of HSK. Factors triggering reactivation include stress, illness, immunosuppression, or trauma. Recurrent episodes can manifest in different clinical patterns, ranging from mild epithelial involvement to more severe stromal or endothelial disease. The severity and frequency of recurrences vary among individuals. Severe cases of HSK, especially those involving the stroma and leading to scarring, can result in vision impairment or even blindness in extreme cases. The cornea's clarity is crucial for good vision, and scarring can compromise this, potentially leading to visual impairment. The management of HSK involves not only treating acute episodes but also implementing long-term strategies to prevent recurrences and attempt repairs of corneal nerve endings via neurotization. Antiviral medications, such as oral Acyclovir or topical Ganciclovir, may be prescribed for prophylaxis. The immune response to the virus can contribute to corneal damage. Inflammation, caused by the body's attempt to control the infection, may inadvertently harm the corneal tissues. Clinicians should be informed about triggers and advised on measures to minimize the risk of reactivation. In summary, the recurrent nature of HSK underscores the importance of both acute and long-term management strategies to preserve corneal health and maintain optimal visual function.

Establishment of mouse model of neurotrophic keratopathy through TRPV1 neuronal ablation

Neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) is a challenging disease with the reduced innervation to the cornea. To establish a genetic and stable mouse model of NK, we utilized the TRPV1-DTR mice with intraperitoneal injection of diphtheria toxin (DT) to selectively eliminate TRPV1 neurons. After DT administration, the mice exhibited robust ablation of TRPV1 neurons in the trigeminal ganglion, accompanied with reduced corneal sensation and nerve density, as well as the decreased calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P levels. According to disease progression of TRPV1 neuronal ablation, tear secretion was reduced from day 3, which followed by corneal epithelial punctate lesions from day 7. From day 11 to day 16, the mice exhibited persistent corneal epithelial defects and stromal edema. By day 21, corneal ulceration and stromal melting were observed with the abundant inflammatory cell infiltration, corneal neovascularization, and enhanced cell apoptosis. Moreover, subconjunctival injection of CGRP delayed the NK progression with the characteristics of reduced severe corneal epithelial lesions and corneal inflammation. In addition, the impairments of conjunctival goblet cells, lacrimal gland, and meibomian gland were identified by the diminished expression of MUC5AC, AQP5, and PPARγ, respectively. Therefore, these results suggest that the TRPV1-DTR mice may serve as a reliable animal model for the research of NK pathogenesis.

Phase IV Multicenter, Prospective, Open-Label Clinical Trial of Cenegermin (rhNGF) for Stage 1 Neurotrophic Keratopathy (DEFENDO)

INTRODUCTION

Cenegermin is approved for treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) and has been studied in patients with stage 2 or 3 NK. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of cenegermin in adults with stage 1 NK.

METHODS

This was a phase IV, multicenter, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled trial. Adults with stage 1 NK (Mackie criteria) and decreased corneal sensitivity (≤ 4 cm) received 1 drop of cenegermin 20 mcg/ml in the affected eye(s) 6 times/day for 8 weeks with a 24-week follow-up.

RESULTS

Of 37 patients, corneal epithelial healing was observed in 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.1-94.9%; P < 0.001) at week 8; 95.2% (95% CI 76.2-99.9%; P < 0.001) of those patients remained healed at the end of the 24-week follow-up (week 32). At week 8, 91.2% (95% CI 76.3-98.1%; P < 0.001) of patients experienced improved corneal sensitivity; this improvement was observed in 82.1% (95% CI 63.1-93.9%; P < 0.001) of patients at week 32. Mean best-corrected distance visual acuity change from baseline at week 8 was - 0.10 logMAR (standard deviation [SD], 0.15; 95% CI - 0.16 to - 0.05; P < 0.001) and at week 32 was - 0.05 logMAR (SD, 0.16; 95% CI - 0.11 to 0.01; P = 0.122). At weeks 8 and 32, 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9%; P < 0.001) and 10.7% (95% CI 2.3-28.2%; P < 0.001) of patients, respectively, had a 15-letter gain from baseline. At least one adverse event (AE) was reported by 73.0% and 45.7% of patients during the treatment and follow-up periods, respectively. The most common treatment-related, treatment-emergent AEs were eye pain (37.8%), blurred vision (10.8%), and eyelid pain (8.1%); these were mostly mild or moderate and were only reported during the treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the potential use of cenegermin for treating patients with stage 1 NK, and future confirmatory studies would be beneficial to elaborate on these findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DEFENDO; NCT04485546.

Neurotrophic keratitis: inflammatory pathogenesis and novel therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurotrophic keratitis is a rare degenerative disease characterized by decrease or absence of corneal sensation. Neurotrophic keratitis varies from mild forms with mild epitheliopathy to severe manifestations such as corneal ulceration, melting and perforation that can lead to irreversible visual loss. The cause of neurotrophic keratitis comprises a long list of diseases, medications, congenital or genetic conditions as well as trauma. The mechanism of neurotrophic keratitis is complex and multifactorial and its understanding is crucial to better address the treatment strategies. We aimed to review neurotrophic keratitis pathology, mechanisms and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Corneal nerves are critical for the homeostasis of a healthy ocular surface. The lack of nerve-derived neuromediators and corneal-released neuropeptides, neuro-trophins and neurotrophic factors in neurotrophic keratitis leads to a decrease in trophic supply to corneal cells in addition to a decrease in afferent signaling to the brain. This results in pathological tear secretion, decreased blinking rate, corneal healing along with ocular surface and corneal inflammation. Lately, nerve growth factor in special gained emphasis as a treatment strategy targeting the disease mechanism rather than its manifestations. Other therapies, including surgical interventions, are in the pipeline of neurotrophic keratitis management. However, there are still no proper therapeutic guidelines and neurotrophic keratitis treatment remains challenging.

SUMMARY

Neurotrophic keratitis may have a devastating outcome and treatment is still challenging. Understanding the disease pathology may assist in the development of new treatment strategies. Prompt disease recognition and immediate intervention are key factors to promote corneal healing and avoid further deterioration.

Clinical diagnosis and management of Demodex blepharitis: the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH)

BACKGROUND

Twelve ocular surface disease experts convened to achieve consensus about Demodex blepharitis (DB) using a modified Delphi panel process.

METHODS

Online surveys were administered using scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions. Consensus for questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7-9 and 1-3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panellists agreed. Questions were randomized, and results of each survey informed the following survey.

RESULTS

Twelve practitioners comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). Following 3 surveys, experts agreed that DB is chronic (n = 11) and recurrent (n = 12) and is often misdiagnosed. Consensus was achieved regarding inflammation driving symptoms (median = 7; range 7-9), collarettes as the most common sign (n = 10) and pathognomonic for DB (median = 9; range 8-9), and itching as the most common symptom (n = 12). Panellists agreed that DB may be diagnosed based on collarettes, mites, and/or patient symptoms (n = 10) and felt that patients unresponsive to typical therapies should be evaluated for DB (n = 12). Consensus about the most effective currently available OTC treatment was not reached.

CONCLUSIONS

The Delphi methodology proved effective in establishing consensus about DB, including signs, symptoms, and diagnosis. Consensus was not reached about the best treatment or how to grade severity. With increased awareness, eyecare practitioners can offer DB patients better clinical outcomes. A follow-up Delphi panel is planned to obtain further consensus surrounding DB treatment.

Neurotrophic keratopathy: An updated understanding

PURPOSE

To propose an updated definition and staging system for neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) and provide consensus on diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

A study group was convened to review the data pertinent to NK using a modified nominal group process. They proposed an updated definition for NK and a new 6-step staging system (Neurotrophic Keratopathy Study Group [NKSG] Classification) that can be used in conjunction with the different treatment options available currently or in the future.

RESULTS

NK is defined as the dysfunction of corneal innervation that results in dysregulation of corneal and/or cellular function. It is characterized by loss of corneal sensation and neuronal homeostasis, leading to eventual corneal epithelial breakdown and ultimately keratolysis if untreated. The NKSG classification emphasizes verifying corneal sensation early and distinguishes different epithelial and stromal aspects of NK with the following stages: stage 1 (altered sensation without keratopathy), stage 2 (epitheliopathy/punctate epithelial keratopathy [PEK] without stromal haze), stage 3 (persistent/recurrent epithelial defects without stromal haze), stage 4 (epitheliopathy/PEK or persistent/recurrent epithelial defects with stromal haze), stage 5 (persistent/recurrent epithelial defect with corneal ulceration), and stage 6 (corneal perforation). Treatment consists of a variety of modalities (both indirect and direct).

CONCLUSIONS

This updated definition and staging system will provide clinicians with the necessary information to diagnose and treat NK at an early stage before it becomes a sight-threatening disorder. It also provides a framework for evaluating current and future treatment options at distinct stages of the disease.

The Role of Sensory Innervation in Homeostatic and Injury-Induced Corneal Epithelial Renewal

The cornea is the window through which we see the world. Corneal clarity is required for vision, and blindness occurs when the cornea becomes opaque. The cornea is covered by unique transparent epithelial cells that serve as an outermost cellular barrier bordering between the cornea and the external environment. Corneal sensory nerves protect the cornea from injury by triggering tearing and blink reflexes, and are also thought to regulate corneal epithelial renewal via unknown mechanism(s). When protective corneal sensory innervation is absent due to infection, trauma, intracranial tumors, surgery, or congenital causes, permanent blindness results from repetitive epithelial microtraumas and failure to heal. The condition is termed neurotrophic keratopathy (NK), with an incidence of 5:10,000 people worldwide. In this report, we review the currently available therapeutic solutions for NK and discuss the progress in our understanding of how the sensory nerves induce corneal epithelial renewal.

Neurotrophic keratopathy following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery

PURPOSE

To describe clinical characteristics and visual outcomes of eyes developing neurotrophic keratopathy (NK) following rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair.

METHODS

All eyes with NK at Wills Eye Hospital following RRD repair from June 1, 2011, to December 1, 2020 were included. Patients with prior ocular procedures (other than cataract surgery), herpetic keratitis, and diabetes mellitus were excluded.

RESULTS

During the study period, 241 patients were diagnosed with NK, and 8179 eyes underwent RRD surgery, giving a 9-year prevalence rate of 0.1% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.2%). Mean age was 53.4 ± 16.6 years during RRD repair and 56.5 ± 13.4 years during NK diagnosis. Mean time to NK diagnosis was 3.0 ± 5.6 years (range, 6 days to 18.8 years). Mean visual acuity before NK was 1.10 ± 0.56 logMAR (20/252 Snellen), and it was 1.01 ± 0.62 logMAR (20/205 Snellen) at final visit (p = 0.75). Six eyes (54.5%) developed NK <1 year following RRD surgery. Mean final visual acuity was 1.01 ± 0.53 logMAR (20/205 Snellen) in this group versus 1.01 ± 0.78 logMAR (20/205 Snellen) in the delayed NK group (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

NK may present acutely or up to several years following surgery, with severity of corneal defects ranging from stage 1 to stage 3 NK. Surgeons should be mindful of the potential for this rare complication following RRD repair and consider close corneal monitoring.

Corneal nerve regeneration is affected by scar location in herpes simplex keratitis: A longitudinal in vivo confocal microscopy study

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of corneal scar location on corneal nerve regeneration in patients with herpes simplex virus (HSV) keratitis in their affected and contralateral eyes over a 1-year period by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and to correlate these findings to corneal sensation measured by Cochet-Bonnet Esthesiometer.

METHODS

Prospective, longitudinal, case-control study. Bilateral corneal nerve density and corneal sensation were analyzed centrally and peripherally in 24 healthy controls and 23 patients with unilateral HSV-related corneal scars using IVCM.

RESULTS

In the central scar (CS) group, total nerve density in the central cornea remained significantly lower compared to controls at follow-up (11.05 ± 1.97mm/mm2, p < 0.001), and no significant nerve regeneration was observed (p = 0.090). At follow-up, total nerve density was not significantly different from controls in the central and peripheral cornea of the peripheral scar (PS) group (all p > 0.05), but significant nerve regeneration was observed in central corneas (16.39 ± 2.39mm/mm2, p = 0.007) compared to baseline. In contralateral eyes, no significant corneal nerve regeneration was observed in central or peripheral corneas of patients with central scars or peripheral scars at 1-year follow-up, compared to baseline (p > 0.05). There was a positive correlation between corneal nerve density and sensation in both central (R = 0.53, p < 0.0001) and peripheral corneas (R = 0.27, p = 0.0004). In the CS group, the corneal sensitivity was <4 cm in 4 (30.8%) and 7 (53.8%) patients in the central and peripheral corneas at baseline, and in 5 (38.5%) and 2 subjects (15.4%) at follow-up, whereas in the PS group only 1 patient (10%) showed a corneal sensation < 4 cm in the central cornea at baseline, and only 1 (10.0%), 3 (30.0%) and 1 (10.0%) patients at follow-up in the central, affected and opposite area of the cornea, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The location of HSV scarring in the cornea affects the level of corneal nerve regeneration. Eyes with central corneal scar have a diminished capacity to regenerate nerves in central cornea, show a more severe reduction in corneal sensation in the central and peripheral corneas that persist at follow-up, and have a reduced capability to restore the corneal sensitivity above the cut-off of 4 cm. Thus, clinicians should be aware that CS patients would benefit from closer monitoring for potential complications associated with neurotrophic keratopathy, as they have a lower likelihood for nerve regeneration.

Delphi Panel Consensus Regarding Current Clinical Practice Management Options for Demodex blepharitis

Purpose

To obtain consensus on Demodex blepharitis (DB) treatment using a modified Delphi panel process.

Methods

Literature search identified gaps in knowledge surrounding treatment of DB. Twelve ocular surface disease experts comprised the Demodex Expert Panel on Treatment and Eyelid Health (DEPTH). They completed a live roundtable discussion in addition to 3 surveys consisting of scaled, open-ended, true/false, and multiple-choice questions pertaining to the treatment of DB. Consensus for scaled questions using a 1 to 9 Likert scale was predefined as median scores of 7-9 and 1-3. For other question types, consensus was achieved when 8 of 12 panelists agreed.

Results

The experts agreed that an effective therapeutic agent for treatment of DB would likely decrease the necessity of mechanical intervention, such as lid scrubs or blepharoexfoliation (Median = 8.5; Range 2-9). When treating DB, panelists believed that collarettes serve as a surrogate for mites, and that eliminating or reducing collarettes should be the main clinical goal of treatment (Median = 8; Range 7-9). The panelists would treat patients with at least 10 collarettes, regardless of other signs or symptoms and agreed that DB can be cured, but there is always the possibility for a reinfestation (n = 12). There was also consensus that collarettes, and therefore mites, are the primary treatment target and the way by which clinicians can monitor patient response to therapy (Median = 8; Range 7-9).

Conclusion

Expert panelists achieved consensus on key facets of DB treatment. Specifically, there was consensus that collarettes are pathognomonic for DB, that DB patients with >10 collarettes should be treated even in the absence of symptoms, and that treatment efficacy can be tracked by collarette resolution. By increasing awareness about DB, understanding the goals of and monitoring treatment efficacy, patients will receive better care and, ultimately, better clinical outcomes.

Magic Bullets: The Coming Age of Meaningful Pharmacological Control of the Corneal Responses to Injury and Disease

Corneal injuries from chemical burns, mechanical trauma, infections, immunological rejections, surgical complications, and some diseases are commonly associated with persistent epithelial defects (PED), neurotrophic epitheliopathy, scarring fibrosis, corneal neovascularization (CNV), and/or corneal endothelial damage that lead to vision loss. Several Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medications have recently become available, are currently in clinical trials, or are likely to enter clinical trials in the near future. For example, a 2-week course of topical human recombinant nerve growth factor is frequently an effective treatment for corneal neurotrophic epitheliopathy associated with PEDs. Topical losartan, an angiotensin converting enzyme II receptor antagonist that also inhibits TGF beta signaling, has been shown to effectively decrease myofibroblast generation and scarring fibrosis in alkali burn injury and Descemetorhexis rabbit models. Small molecule topical tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib and axitinib, FDA approved as chemotherapeutic agents to treat specific cancers, have also been found to be effective topical inhibitors of CNV in animal and human trials. Rho-kinase inhibitors, such as ripasudil and netarsudil, that are currently approved agents for the treatment of glaucoma in some countries, have been shown to stimulate corneal endothelial proliferation in animal studies and human trials, and may accelerate the regeneration of Descemet's membrane. These agents, as well as other drugs in development, will be used in targeted combinations to treat corneal pathophysiology associated with epithelial healing disorders, stromal scarring fibrosis, CNV, and corneal endothelial injury during the next decade.

An Adaptation of the RAND/UCLA Modified Delphi Panel Method in the Time of COVID-19

The RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel method is a formal group consensus process that systematically and quantitatively combines expert opinion and evidence by asking panelists to rate, discuss, then re-rate items. The method has been used to develop medical society guidelines, other clinical practice guidelines, disease classification systems, research agendas, and quality improvement interventions. Traditionally, a group of experts meet in person to discuss results of a first-round survey. After the meeting, experts complete a second-round survey used to develop areas of consensus. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this aspect of the method was not possible. As such, we have adapted the method to conduct virtual RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panels. In this study, we present a targeted literature review to describe and summarize the existing evidence on the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel method and outline our adaptation for conducting these panels virtually. Transitioning from in-person to virtual meetings was not without challenges, but there have also been unexpected advantages. The method we describe here can be a cost-effective and efficient alternative for researchers and clinicians.