1
|
Zurynski Y, Ludlow K, Testa L, Augustsson H, Herkes-Deane J, Hutchinson K, Lamprell G, McPherson E, Carrigan A, Ellis LA, Dharmayani PNA, Smith CL, Richardson L, Dammery G, Singh N, Braithwaite J. Built to last? Barriers and facilitators of healthcare program sustainability: a systematic integrative review. Implement Sci 2023; 18:62. [PMID: 37957669 PMCID: PMC10641997 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01315-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify barriers and facilitators associated with the sustainability of implemented and evaluated improvement programs in healthcare delivery systems. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING Six academic databases were searched to identify relevant peer-reviewed journal articles published in English between July 2011 and June 2022. Studies were included if they reported on healthcare program sustainability and explicitly identified barriers to, and facilitators of, sustainability. STUDY DESIGN A systematic integrative review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. Study quality was appraised using Hawker's Quality Assessment Tool. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS A team of reviewers screened eligible studies against the inclusion criteria and extracted the data independently using a purpose-designed Excel spreadsheet. Barriers and facilitators were extracted and mapped to the Integrated Sustainability Framework (ISF). Frequency counts of reported barriers/facilitators were performed across the included studies. RESULTS Of the 124 studies included in this review, almost half utilised qualitative designs (n = 52; 41.9%) and roughly one third were conducted in the USA (n = 43; 34.7%). Few studies (n = 29; 23.4%) reported on program sustainability beyond 5 years of program implementation and only 16 of them (55.2%) defined sustainability. Factors related to the ISF categories of inner setting (n = 99; 79.8%), process (n = 99; 79.8%) and intervention characteristics (n = 72; 58.1%) were most frequently reported. Leadership/support (n = 61; 49.2%), training/support/supervision (n = 54; 43.5%) and staffing/turnover (n = 50; 40.3%) were commonly identified barriers or facilitators of sustainability across included studies. Forty-six (37.1%) studies reported on the outer setting category: funding (n = 26; 56.5%), external leadership by stakeholders (n = 16; 34.8%), and socio-political context (n = 14; 30.4%). Eight studies (6.5%) reported on discontinued programs, with factors including funding and resourcing, poor fit, limited planning, and intervention complexity contributing to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS This review highlights the importance of taking into consideration the inner setting, processes, intervention characteristics and outer setting factors when sustaining healthcare programs, and the need for long-term program evaluations. There is a need to apply consistent definitions and implementation frameworks across studies to strengthen evidence in this area. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/11/e018568 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Zurynski
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109.
- NHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.
| | - Kristiana Ludlow
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Luke Testa
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
| | - Hanna Augustsson
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
- Procome Research Group, Medical Management Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Jessica Herkes-Deane
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
| | - Karen Hutchinson
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
| | - Gina Lamprell
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
| | - Elise McPherson
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
| | - Ann Carrigan
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
| | - Louise A Ellis
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
- NHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
| | - Putu Novi Arfirsta Dharmayani
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
- NHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
| | - Carolynn L Smith
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
- NHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
| | - Lieke Richardson
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
| | - Genevieve Dammery
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
- NHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
| | - Nehal Singh
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia, Level 6, 75 Talavera Rd, NSW, 2109
- NHMRC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Eiroa-Orosa FJ. Beyond recovery: toward rights-based mental health care - A cluster randomized wait-list controlled trial of a recovery and rights training for mental health professionals with or without first person accounts. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1152581. [PMID: 37780153 PMCID: PMC10539929 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1152581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Mental health models grounded in Recovery and Rights are driving the advancement of transformative care systems through multifaceted actions, which encompass Continuing Professional Development. The objective of this work is to evaluate a training activity developed through a participatory process that included people with lived experience of psychosocial distress, their relatives, and mental health professionals. Methods The training focused on alternatives to diagnosis, recovery principles, rights-based care, and peer support. The evaluation followed a cluster randomized wait-list controlled design. Four hundred eighty-eight health professionals from eight care centers were randomized to three experimental conditions: a wait list control, which underwent a one-month interval between the baseline assessment and the training activity, and two experimental groups, with or without first-person accounts, which accessed the training immediately after completing the baseline assessment. The dependent variables measured at all follow-ups were beliefs and attitudes toward mental health service users' rights. One hundred ninety-two professionals completed at least one follow-up and were included in the analyses. Results We observed different evolutions of experimental and control groups with statistically significant differences for tolerance to coercion and total beliefs and attitudes scores. No differences were observed between the groups with or who attended training activities with or without first person accounts. Upon receiving the training activity, the control group had an evolution equivalent to the experimental groups. Discussion The results of this evaluation project provide compelling evidence for the need to expand recovery and rights training activities to reach a larger audience of mental health professionals These training activities hold the potential to positively influence the beliefs and attitudes of mental health professionals, ultimately contributing toward a better future for individuals with lived experience of psychosocial distress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa
- Section of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- First-Person Research Group, Veus, Catalan Federation of 1st Person Mental Health Organisations, Barcelona, Spain
- Yale Program for Recovery and Community Health, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Banwell E, Humphrey N, Qualter P. Child and adolescent mental health services in a devolved healthcare system: a qualitative exploration of sustainable practices. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:27. [PMID: 37020214 PMCID: PMC10075492 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00970-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The transference of research evidence into routine healthcare practice remains poorly understood. This includes understanding the prerequisites of longer-term viability. The present study investigated the sustainable practices of GM i-THRIVE, a programme which reconceptualizes mental health services for children and young people (CYP) in Greater Manchester, United Kingdom. We aimed to establish whether a sustainable future was likely, and to identify areas of focus to improve that likelihood. METHODS The NHS Sustainability Model, typically completed as a questionnaire measure, was converted into interview questions. The responses of nine professionals, from a variety of roles across the CYP mental health workforce, were explored using inductive thematic framework analysis. Selected participants completed the original questionnaire. RESULTS Five themes (communication; support; barriers to implementation; past, present, and future: the implementation journey; and the nuances of GM i-THRIVE) and 21 subthemes formed the final thematic framework. Relationships with senior leaders and with colleagues across the workforce were seen as important. Leaders' roles in providing meaning and fit were emphasized. Whilst training delivered the programme's aims well, monitoring its dissemination was challenging. Widespread issues with dedicating sufficient time to implementation were raised. The flexibility of the programme, which can be applied in multiple ways, was discussed positively. This flexibility links to the idea of GM i-THRIVE as a mindset change, and the uniqueness of this style of intervention was discussed. To varying degrees, themes were supported by responses to the quantitative measure, although several limitations to the use of the questionnaire were discovered. Consequently, they were used to infer conclusions to a lesser degree than originally intended. CONCLUSIONS Professionals involved with GM i-THRIVE reported many elements that indicate a positive future for the programme. However, they suggested that more attention should be given to embedding the core concepts of the model at the current stage of implementation. Limitations relating to its use within our study are discussed, but we conclude that the NHS Sustainability Model is a suitable way of guiding qualitative implementation research. It is especially valuable for localized interventions. The constraints of our small sample size on transferability are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Banwell
- Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
| | - Neil Humphrey
- Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Pamela Qualter
- Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Donnelly LJ, Cervantes PE, Guo F, Stein CR, Okparaeke E, Kuriakose S, Filton B, Havens J, Horwitz SM. Changes in Attitudes and Knowledge after Trainings in a Clinical Care Pathway for Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2023; 53:606-614. [PMID: 33201422 DOI: 10.1007/s10803-020-04775-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Caring for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) can be complicated, especially when challenging behaviors are present. Providers may feel unprepared to work with these individuals because specialized training for medical and social service providers is limited. To increase access to specialized training, we modified an effective half-day ASD-Care Pathway training (Kuriakose et al. 2018) and disseminated it within five different settings. This short, focused training on strategies for preventing and reducing challenging behaviors of patients with ASD resulted in significant improvements in staff perceptions of challenging behaviors, increased comfort in working with the ASD population, and increased staff knowledge for evidence-informed practices. Implications, including the impact of sociodemographic characteristics on pre/post changes, and future directions are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren J Donnelly
- Child Study Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| | - Paige E Cervantes
- Child Study Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Fei Guo
- Child Study Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Population Heath, NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cheryl R Stein
- Child Study Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Eugene Okparaeke
- Child Study Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah Kuriakose
- Child Study Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- New York State Office of Mental Health, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Beryl Filton
- Child Study Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jennifer Havens
- Child Study Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Office of Behavioral Health, NYC Health and Hospitals, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sarah M Horwitz
- Child Study Center, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sofouli E, Wiltsey-Stirman S, Groleau D, Perreault M, Piat M. Identifying and Exploring Sustainability Determinants of Mental Health Recovery-Oriented Interventions: A Mixed Methods Study Protocol. GLOBAL IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS 2022; 2:249-261. [PMID: 36035969 PMCID: PMC9395767 DOI: 10.1007/s43477-022-00052-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Mental health recovery is the new paradigm in the mental health service delivery system worldwide. Recovery-oriented services go beyond traditional clinical care that is centered on symptom remission, aiming to help people: restore social connections with other individuals and the community; develop hope and optimism for the future; reconstruct an identity beyond that of a “mental patient”; discover meaning in life; and feel empowered to gain control over treatment (CHIME framework). Over the last ten years, several efforts at implementation of recovery-oriented interventions have been documented in the scientific literature. However, little attention has been given to their sustainability, even though it is reported that not all health interventions can fully sustain their activities beyond the initial implementation phase. The aim of this mixed methods case study is to better understand the factors that determine the sustainability of two recovery-oriented interventions (peer support and recovery training) after their roll-out in four organizations in Canada that provide community housing for adults with mental health challenges. Qualitative and quantitative data will be collected from managers, service providers, and implementation team members that oversaw the implementation process along with organizational documents. Data collection and analysis will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Sustainability Constructs in Healthcare, the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications, and the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool. Findings will expand our current evidence base on the intersection of sustainability and mental health recovery interventions that remains under-explored.
Collapse
|
6
|
Xu RH, Zhou LM, Wong ELY, Chang J, Wang D. Satisfaction With Patient Engagement and Self-Reported Depression Among Hospitalized Patients: A Propensity-Score Matching Analysis. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:751412. [PMID: 35356709 PMCID: PMC8959894 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.751412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is common among hospitalized patients and poses a significant threat to their quality of life. Patient engagement (PE) in healthcare has been shown to be associated with positive health outcomes. However, the relationship between PE and depression among hospitalized patients, with and without chronic conditions, has not yet been explored. This study aimed to investigate the association between patients' satisfaction with PE and self-reported depression in Chinese public hospitals. METHOD A multi-centered, cross-sectional survey was conducted in seven tertiary-level public hospitals in Guangdong province, China. Twelve items from a patient-centered care questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire 2-item version were used were used to assess patients' satisfaction with PE and self-reported depression, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) approach was used to reduce selection bias and potential baseline differences between patients with and without chronic conditions. The relationship between satisfaction with PE and depression was assessed, using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS A total of 1,974 hospitalized patients participated in the survey. After the PSM procedure, 604 patients were assigned to the chronic condition group, and another 604 patients were successfully matched in the comparison group with no differences in sex, age, educational level, and PE-related characteristics. Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that high satisfaction with PE-related approaches significantly decreased the probability of developing depressive status. Multivariate logistic regression analysis further indicated that, after adjusting all PE-related approaches, "patient education" and "involvement in discharge planning" could significantly decrease the probability of patients developing depression. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that encouraging PE and improving patients' satisfaction with PE interventions in clinical practice led to improved mental health outcomes among hospitalized patients in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Huan Xu
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.,JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ling-Ming Zhou
- School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jinghui Chang
- School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong Wang
- School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Institute of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hawsawi T, Stein-Parbury J, Orr F, Roche M, Gill K. Exploring recovery-focused educational programmes for advancing mental health nursing: An integrative systematic literature review. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2021; 30 Suppl 1:1310-1341. [PMID: 34231293 DOI: 10.1111/inm.12908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Recovery-focused educational programmes have been implemented in mental health services in an attempt to transform care from a purely biomedical orientation to a more recovery-oriented approach. Mental health nurses have identified the need for enhancing their abilities and confidence in translating recovery knowledge into mental health nursing practice. However, recovery-focused educational programmes have not fully address nurses' learning needs. Therefore, this review synthesized the evidence of the effectiveness of recovery-focused educational programmes for mental health nurses. A systematic search of electronic databases and hand-searched references was conducted. It identified 35 programmes and 55 educational materials within 39 studies. Synthesizing the literature revealed three themes and nine subthemes. The first theme, a framework for understanding and supporting consumers' recovery, had four subthemes: consumers' involvement, multidisciplinary approach, profession-specific training, and performance indicators. The second theme, contents of educational materials, included the subthemes: knowledge development and recovery-focused care planning. The final theme, nurses' learning experiences, included the subthemes: understanding recovery, the positive effects of recovery-focused educational programmes, and implementation of recovery-oriented practices. Based on these findings, a mental health nursing recovery-focused educational programme framework is proposed. Further research should investigate the effectiveness of the framework, especially in relation to recovery-focused care planning and consumer and carer involvement in the development, delivery, participation, and evaluation of these educational programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahani Hawsawi
- Faculty of Nursing, King Abdul-Aziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jane Stein-Parbury
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fiona Orr
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Roche
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sustainability of innovations in healthcare: A systematic review and conceptual framework for professional pharmacy services. Res Social Adm Pharm 2020; 16:1331-1343. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
9
|
Eiroa-Orosa FJ, García-Mieres H. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Recovery Educational Interventions for Mental Health Professionals. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2020; 46:724-752. [PMID: 31338638 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-019-00956-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The history of mental health care has been marked by various struggles in maintaining the dignity of service users. Some reform movements have started to use educational strategies aimed at the beliefs and attitudes of professionals, as well as changing the way that practice is carried out. This paper intends to systematically review and synthesize studies assessing awareness and training activities for mental health professionals covering aspects related to recovery, empowerment, and in general, rights-based care to achieve full citizenship of mental health services users. We reviewed 26 articles and were able to include 14 of them in meta-analytic calculations. Our results at the qualitative level show an evolution of the literature towards better quality designs and focus on aspects related to the impact and maintenance of the effects of these training activities. Meta-analytic calculations found high heterogeneity but no risk of biases and low-to moderate effect sizes with a statistically significant impact on beliefs and attitudes but not on practices. The importance of this information in improving and advancing these educational activities is addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa
- Section of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Institute of Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, 171, 08035, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. .,Yale Program for Recovery and Community Health, Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. .,First-Person Research Group, Veus, Catalan Federation of 1st Person Mental Health Organisations, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Helena García-Mieres
- Section of Personality, Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Institute of Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, 171, 08035, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Braithwaite J, Ludlow K, Testa L, Herkes J, Augustsson H, Lamprell G, McPherson E, Zurynski Y. Built to last? The sustainability of healthcare system improvements, programmes and interventions: a systematic integrative review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036453. [PMID: 32487579 PMCID: PMC7265014 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The sustainability of healthcare delivery systems is challenged by ageing populations, complex systems, increasing rates of chronic disease, increasing costs associated with new medical technologies and growing expectations by healthcare consumers. Healthcare programmes, innovations and interventions are increasingly implemented at the front lines of care to increase effectiveness and efficiency; however, little is known about how sustainability is conceptualised and measured in programme evaluations. OBJECTIVES We aimed to describe theoretical frameworks, definitions and measures of sustainability, as applied in published evaluations of healthcare improvement programmes and interventions. DESIGN Systematic integrative review. METHODS We searched six academic databases, CINAHL, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Emerald Management, Scopus and Web of Science, for peer-reviewed English journal articles (July 2011-March 2018). Articles were included if they assessed programme sustainability or sustained outcomes of a programme at the healthcare system level. Six reviewers conducted the abstract and full-text review. Data were extracted on study characteristics, definitions, terminology, theoretical frameworks, methods and tools. Hawker's Quality Assessment Tool was applied to included studies. RESULTS Of the 92 included studies, 75.0% were classified as high quality. Twenty-seven (29.3%) studies provided 32 different definitions of sustainability. Terms used interchangeably for sustainability included continuation, maintenance, follow-up or long term. Eighty studies (87.0%) clearly reported the timepoints at which sustainability was evaluated: 43.0% at 1-2 years and 11.3% at <12 months. Eighteen studies (19.6%) used a theoretical framework to conceptualise or assess programme sustainability, including frameworks that were not specifically designed to assess sustainability. CONCLUSIONS The body of literature is limited by the use of inconsistent definitions and measures of programme sustainability. Evaluations of service improvement programmes and interventions seldom used theoretical frameworks. Embedding implementation science and healthcare service researchers into the healthcare system is a promising strategy to improve the rigour of programme sustainability evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- NHMRC Partnership Centre in Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kristiana Ludlow
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- NHMRC Partnership Centre in Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luke Testa
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jessica Herkes
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hanna Augustsson
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gina Lamprell
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elise McPherson
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yvonne Zurynski
- Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- NHMRC Partnership Centre in Health System Sustainability, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eklund M, Argentzell E, Bejerholm U, Brunt D, Tjörnstrand C. Outcomes of the Active in My Home (AiMH) intervention for people with psychiatric disabilities in supported housing: A longitudinal pilot and feasibility study. Br J Occup Ther 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/0308022619888872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Eklund
- Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - David Brunt
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linneaus University, Växjö, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goodridge D, McDonald M, New L, Scharf M, Harrison E, Rotter T, Watson E, Henry C, Penz ED. Building patient capacity to participate in care during hospitalisation: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026551. [PMID: 31272973 PMCID: PMC6615828 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To map the existing literature and describe interventions aimed at building the capacity of patients to participate in care during hospitalisation by: (1) describing and categorising the aspects of care targeted by these interventions and (2) identifying the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) used in these interventions. A patient representative participated in all aspects of this project. DESIGN Scoping review. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (Inception -2017). STUDY SELECTION Studies reporting primary research studies on building the capacity of hospitalised adult patients to participate in care which described or included one or more structured or systematic interventions and described the outcomes for at least the key stakeholder group were included. DATA EXTRACTION Title and abstract screening and full text screening were conducted by pairs of trained reviewers. One reviewer extracted data, which were verified by a second reviewer. Interventions were classified according to seven aspects of care relevant to hospital settings. BCTs identified in the articles were assigned through consensus of three reviewers. RESULTS Database searches yielded a total 9899 articles, resulting in 87 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Interventions directed at building patient capacity to participate in care while hospitalised were categorised as those related to improving: patient safety (20.9%); care coordination (5.7%); effective treatment (5.7%) and/or patient-centred care using: bedside nursing handovers (5.7%); communication (29.1%); care planning (14%) or the care environment (19.8%). The majority of studies reported one or more positive outcomes from the defined intervention. Adding new elements (objects) to the environment and restructuring the social and/or physical environment were the most frequently identified BCTs. CONCLUSIONS The majority of studies to build capacity for participation in care report one or more positive outcomes, although a more comprehensive analysis is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Goodridge
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Meghan McDonald
- School of Nursing, Saskatchewan Polytechnic, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Lucia New
- School of Nursing, Saskatchewan Polytechnic, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Murray Scharf
- College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Harrison
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Thomas Rotter
- Healthcare Quality Programs, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin Watson
- Leslie and Irene Dube Health Sciences Library, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Chrysanthus Henry
- Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Erika D Penz
- Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sustainability of a Care Pathway for Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder on an Inpatient Psychiatric Service. J Autism Dev Disord 2019; 49:3173-3180. [DOI: 10.1007/s10803-019-04029-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
14
|
Kalisova L, Pav M, Winkler P, Michalec J, Killaspy H. Quality of care in long-term care departments in mental health facilities across the Czech Republic. Eur J Public Health 2018; 28:885-890. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Kalisova
- Department of Psychiatry, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marek Pav
- Psychiatric Hospital Bohnice, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Petr Winkler
- Department of Social Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic
- Health Service & Population Research Department, IoPPN, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jiri Michalec
- Department of Psychiatry, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Helen Killaspy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shelton RC, Cooper BR, Stirman SW. The Sustainability of Evidence-Based Interventions and Practices in Public Health and Health Care. Annu Rev Public Health 2018; 39:55-76. [PMID: 29328872 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-014731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 358] [Impact Index Per Article: 59.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
There is strong interest in implementation science to address the gap between research and practice in public health. Research on the sustainability of evidence-based interventions has been growing rapidly. Sustainability has been defined as the continued use of program components at sufficient intensity for the sustained achievement of desirable program goals and population outcomes. This understudied area has been identified as one of the most significant translational research problems. Adding to this challenge is uncertainty regarding the extent to which intervention adaptation and evolution are necessary to address the needs of populations that differ from those in which interventions were originally tested or implemented. This review critically examines and discusses conceptual and methodological issues in studying sustainability, summarizes the multilevel factors that have been found to influence the sustainability of interventions in a range of public health and health care settings, and highlights key areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel C Shelton
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | - Brittany Rhoades Cooper
- Department of Human Development, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164, USA;
| | - Shannon Wiltsey Stirman
- Dissemination and Training Division, National Center for PTSD and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94024, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
A cluster randomised controlled trial of a staff-training intervention in residential units for people with long-term mental illness in Portugal: the PromQual trial. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2017; 52:1435-1445. [PMID: 28667486 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-017-1416-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/25/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a staff-training intervention to improve service users' engagement in activities and quality of care, by means of a cluster randomised controlled trial. METHOD All residential units with at least 12-h a day staff support (n = 23) were invited to participate. Quality of care was assessed with the Quality Indicator for Rehabilitative Care (QuIRC) filled online by the unit's manager. Half the units (n = 12) were randomly assigned to continue providing treatment as usual, and half (n = 11) received a staff-training intervention that focused on skills for engaging service users in activities, with trainers working alongside staff to embed this learning in the service. The primary outcome was service users' level of activity (measured with the Time Use Diary), reassessed at 4 and 8 months. Secondary outcomes were the quality of care provided (QuIRC), and service users' quality of life (Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life) reassessed at 8 months. Generalized linear mixed effect models were used to assess the difference in outcomes between units in the two trial arms. The trial was registered with Current Controlled Trials (Ref NCT02366117). RESULTS Knowledge acquired by the staff during the initial workshops increased significantly (p ≤ 0.01). However, the intervention and comparison units did not differ significantly in primary and secondary outcomes at either follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The intervention increased the level of knowledge of staff without leading to an improvement in service users' engagement in activities, quality of life, or quality of care in the units.
Collapse
|
17
|
Looijmans A, Stiekema APM, Bruggeman R, van der Meer L, Stolk RP, Schoevers RA, Jörg F, Corpeleijn E. Changing the obesogenic environment to improve cardiometabolic health in residential patients with a severe mental illness: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2017; 211:296-303. [PMID: 28982656 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.117.199315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundFor patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in residential facilities, adopting a healthy lifestyle is hampered by the obesity promoting (obesogenic) environment.AimsTo determine the effectiveness of a 12-month lifestyle intervention addressing the obesogenic environment with respect to diet and physical activity to improve waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk factors v. care as usual (Dutch Trial Registry: NTR2720).MethodIn a multisite cluster randomised controlled pragmatic trial, 29 care teams were randomised into 15 intervention (365 patients) and 14 control teams (371 patients). Intervention staff were trained to improve the obesogenic environment.ResultsWaist circumference decreased 1.51 cm (95% CI -2.99 to -0.04) in the intervention v. control group after 3 months and metabolic syndrome z-score decreased 0.22 s.d. (95% CI -0.38 to -0.06). After 12 months, the decrease in waist circumference was no longer statistically significantly different (-1.28 cm, 95% CI -2.79 to 0.23, P=0.097).ConclusionsTargeting the obesogenic environment of residential patients with SMI has the potential to facilitate reduction of abdominal adiposity and cardiometabolic risk, but maintaining initial reductions over the longer term remains challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Looijmans
- Anne Looijmans, MSc, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Annemarie P. M. Stiekema, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Richard Bruggeman, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Lisette van der Meer, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Ronald P. Stolk, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Robert A. Schoevers, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Frederike Jörg, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Research Department, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden; Eva Corpeleijn, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie P M Stiekema
- Anne Looijmans, MSc, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Annemarie P. M. Stiekema, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Richard Bruggeman, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Lisette van der Meer, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Ronald P. Stolk, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Robert A. Schoevers, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Frederike Jörg, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Research Department, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden; Eva Corpeleijn, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Richard Bruggeman
- Anne Looijmans, MSc, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Annemarie P. M. Stiekema, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Richard Bruggeman, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Lisette van der Meer, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Ronald P. Stolk, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Robert A. Schoevers, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Frederike Jörg, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Research Department, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden; Eva Corpeleijn, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lisette van der Meer
- Anne Looijmans, MSc, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Annemarie P. M. Stiekema, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Richard Bruggeman, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Lisette van der Meer, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Ronald P. Stolk, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Robert A. Schoevers, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Frederike Jörg, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Research Department, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden; Eva Corpeleijn, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Stolk
- Anne Looijmans, MSc, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Annemarie P. M. Stiekema, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Richard Bruggeman, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Lisette van der Meer, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Ronald P. Stolk, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Robert A. Schoevers, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Frederike Jörg, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Research Department, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden; Eva Corpeleijn, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert A Schoevers
- Anne Looijmans, MSc, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Annemarie P. M. Stiekema, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Richard Bruggeman, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Lisette van der Meer, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Ronald P. Stolk, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Robert A. Schoevers, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Frederike Jörg, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Research Department, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden; Eva Corpeleijn, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederike Jörg
- Anne Looijmans, MSc, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Annemarie P. M. Stiekema, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Richard Bruggeman, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Lisette van der Meer, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Ronald P. Stolk, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Robert A. Schoevers, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Frederike Jörg, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Research Department, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden; Eva Corpeleijn, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Corpeleijn
- Anne Looijmans, MSc, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Annemarie P. M. Stiekema, PhD, Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Richard Bruggeman, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Lisette van der Meer, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Zuidlaren; Ronald P. Stolk, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Robert A. Schoevers, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen; Frederike Jörg, PhD, Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, and Research Department, Friesland Mental Health Services, Leeuwarden; Eva Corpeleijn, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Rob Giel Research Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Long-Term Sustainability of Evidence-Based Prevention Interventions and Community Coalitions Survival: a Five and One-Half Year Follow-up Study. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2017; 18:610-621. [DOI: 10.1007/s11121-017-0784-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
19
|
Killaspy H, King M, Holloway F, Craig TJ, Cook S, Mundy T, Leavey G, McCrone P, Koeser L, Omar R, Marston L, Arbuthnott M, Green N, Harrison I, Lean M, Gee M, Bhanbhro S. The Rehabilitation Effectiveness for Activities for Life (REAL) study: a national programme of research into NHS inpatient mental health rehabilitation services across England. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2017. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar05070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundThe REAL (Rehabilitation Effectiveness for Activities for Life) research programme, funded by the National Institute for Heath Research (NIHR) from 2009 to 2015, investigated NHS mental health rehabiliation services across England. The users of these services are people with longer-term, complex mental health problems, such as schizophrenia, who have additional problems that complicate recovery. Although only around 10% of people with severe mental illness require inpatient rehabilitation, because of the severity and complexity of their problems they cost 25–50% of the total mental health budget. Despite this, there has been little research to help clinicians and commissioners to plan and deliver effective treatments and services. This research aimed to address this gap.MethodsThe programme had four phases. (1) A national survey, using quantitative and qualitative methods, was used to provide a detailed understanding of the scope and quality of NHS mental health rehabilitation services in England and the characteristics of those who use them. (2) We developed a training intervention for staff of NHS inpatient mental health rehabilitation units to facilitate service users’ activities. (3) The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the staff training programme was evaluated through a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 40 units that scored below average on our quality assessment tool in the national survey. A qualitative process evaluation and a realistic evaluation were carried out to inform our findings further. (4) A naturalistic cohort study was carried out involving 349 service users of 50 units that scored above average on our quality assessment tool in the national survey, who were followed up over 12 months. Factors associated with better clinical outcomes were investigated through exploratory analyses.ResultsMost NHS trusts provided inpatient mental health rehabilitation services. The quality of care provided was higher than that in similar facilities across Europe and was positively associated with service users’ autonomy. Our cluster trial did not find our staff training intervention to be clinically effective [coefficient 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) –1.35 to 4.24]; staff appeared to revert to previous practices once the training team left the unit. Our realistic review suggested that greater supervision and senior staff support could help to address this. Over half of the service users in our cohort study were successfully discharged from hospital over 12 months. Factors associated with this were service users’ activity levels [odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05] and social skills (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.24), and the ‘recovery’ orientation of the unit (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08), which includes collaborative care planning with service users and holding hope for their progress. Quality of care was not associated with costs of care. A relatively small investment (£67 per service user per month) was required to achieve the improvement in everyday functioning that we found in our cohort study.ConclusionsPeople who require inpatient mental health rehabilitation are a ‘low-volume, high-needs’ group. Despite this, these services are able to successfully discharge most to the community within 18 months. Our results suggest that this may be facilitated by recovery-orientated practice that promotes service users’ activities and social skills. Further research is needed to identify effective interventions that enhance such practice to deliver these outcomes. Our research provides evidence that NHS inpatient mental health rehabilitation services deliver high-quality care that successfully supports service users with complex needs in their recovery.Main limitationOur programme included only NHS, non-secure, inpatient mental health rehabilitation services.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN25898179.FundingThe NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Killaspy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Michael King
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Frank Holloway
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Thomas J Craig
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Cook
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tim Mundy
- Centre for Leadership in Health and Social Care, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Gerard Leavey
- Bamford Centre for Mental Health and Wellbeing, Ulster University, Belfast, UK
| | - Paul McCrone
- David Goldberg Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - Rumana Omar
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Nicholas Green
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Isobel Harrison
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Melanie Lean
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Melanie Gee
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sadiq Bhanbhro
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Musuuza JS, Roberts TJ, Carayon P, Safdar N. Assessing the sustainability of daily chlorhexidine bathing in the intensive care unit of a Veteran's Hospital by examining nurses' perspectives and experiences. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:75. [PMID: 28088171 PMCID: PMC5237510 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2180-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 01/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Daily bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) of intensive care unit (ICU) patients has been shown to reduce healthcare-associated infections and colonization by multidrug resistant organisms. The objective of this project was to describe the process of daily CHG bathing and identify the barriers and facilitators that can influence its successful adoption and sustainability in an ICU of a Veterans Administration Hospital. METHODS We conducted 26 semi-structured interviews with a convenience sample of 4 nurse managers (NMs), 13 registered nurses (RNs) and 9 health care technicians (HCTs) working in the ICU. We used qualitative content analysis to code and analyze the data. Dedoose software was used to facilitate data management and coding. Trustworthiness and scientific integrity of the data were ensured by having two authors corroborate the coding process, conducting member checks and keeping an audit trail of all the decisions made. RESULTS Duration of the interviews was 15 to 39 min (average = 26 min). Five steps of bathing were identified: 1) decision to give a bath; 2) ability to give a bath; 3) decision about which soap to use; 4) delegation of a bath; and 5) getting assistance to do a bath. The bathing process resulted in one of the following three outcomes: 1) complete bath; 2) interrupted bath; and 3) bath not done. The outcome was influenced by a combination of barriers and facilitators at each step. Most barriers were related to perceived workload, patient factors, and scheduling. Facilitators were mainly organizational factors such as the policy of daily CHG bathing, the consistent supply of CHG soap, and support such as reminders to conduct CHG baths by nurse managers. CONCLUSIONS Patient bathing in ICUs is a complex process that can be hindered and interrupted by numerous factors. The decision to use CHG soap for bathing was only one of 5 steps of bathing and was largely influenced by scheduling/workload and patient factors such as clinical stability, hypersensitivity to CHG, patient refusal, presence of IV lines and general hygiene. Interventions that address the organizational, provider, and patient barriers to bathing could improve adherence to a daily CHG bathing protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson S Musuuza
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Tonya J Roberts
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Hospital, Madison, WI, USA.,School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Pascale Carayon
- Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.,Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Nasia Safdar
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Affairs Hospital, Madison, WI, USA. .,Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. .,Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gee M, Bhanbhro S, Cook S, Killaspy H. Rapid realist review of the evidence: achieving lasting change when mental health rehabilitation staff undertake recovery-oriented training. J Adv Nurs 2017; 73:1775-1791. [PMID: 27943483 DOI: 10.1111/jan.13232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to identify the factors contributing to lasting change in practice following a recovery-based training intervention for inpatient mental health rehabilitation staff. BACKGROUND Staff training may help nurses and other staff groups in inpatient mental health rehabilitative settings to increase their recovery-oriented practice. There are no published reviews on the effectiveness of such training and few long-term evaluations. This review informed a realist evaluation of a specific intervention (GetREAL). DESIGN Rapid realist review methodology was used to generate and prioritize programme theories. DATA SOURCES ASSIA, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Medline, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and grey literature searches were performed in September 2014-March 2015 with no date restrictions. Stakeholders suggested further documents. GetREAL project documentation was consulted. REVIEW METHODS Programme theory development took place iteratively with literature identification. Stakeholders validated and prioritized emerging programme theories and the prioritized theories were refined using literature case studies. RESULTS Fifty-one relevant documents fed into 49 programme theories articulating seven mechanisms for lasting change. Prioritized mechanisms were: staff receptiveness to change; and staff feeling encouraged, motivated and supported by colleagues and management to change. Seven programme theories were prioritized and refined using data from four case studies. CONCLUSION Lasting change can be facilitated by collaborative action planning, regular collaborative meetings, appointing a change agent, explicit management endorsement and prioritization and modifying organizational structures. Conversely, a challenging organizational climate, or a prevalence of 'change fatigue', may block change. Pre-intervention exploration may help identify any potential barriers to embedding recovery in the organizational culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Gee
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, UK
| | - Sadiq Bhanbhro
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, UK
| | - Sarah Cook
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, UK
| | - Helen Killaspy
- Rehabilitation Psychiatry, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Affiliation(s)
- Karrie Houghton
- Student mental health nurse, University of Central Lancashire
| | - Emma Jones
- Senior lecturer, mental health, School of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bhanbhro S, Gee M, Cook S, Marston L, Lean M, Killaspy H. Recovery-based staff training intervention within mental health rehabilitation units: a two-stage analysis using realistic evaluation principles and framework approach. BMC Psychiatry 2016; 16:292. [PMID: 27535830 PMCID: PMC4989510 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-016-0999-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term change in recovery-based practice in mental health rehabilitation is a research priority. METHODS We used a qualitative case study analysis using a blend of traditional 'framework' analysis and 'realist' approaches to carry out an evaluation of a recovery-focused staff training intervention within three purposively selected mental health rehabilitation units. We maximised the validity of the data by triangulating multiple data sources. RESULTS We found that organisational culture and embedding of a change management programme in routine practice were reported as key influences in sustaining change in practice. The qualitative study generated 10 recommendations on how to achieve long-term change in practice including addressing pre-existing organisational issues and synergising concurrent change programmes. CONCLUSIONS We propose that a recovery-focused staff training intervention requires clear leadership and integration with any existing change management programmes to facilitate sustained improvements in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadiq Bhanbhro
- Centre for Health & Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Montgomery House 32 Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BP UK
| | - Melanie Gee
- Centre for Health & Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Montgomery House 32 Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BP UK
| | - Sarah Cook
- Centre for Health & Social Care Research, Sheffield Hallam University, Montgomery House 32 Collegiate Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2BP UK
| | - Louise Marston
- Departments of Primary Care and Population Health and Priment Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Melanie Lean
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Helen Killaspy
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|