Characteristics of patients with depression initiating or switching antidepressant treatment: baseline analyses of the PERFORM cohort study

Impact of Sertraline, Fluoxetine, and Escitalopram on Psychological Distress among United States Adult Outpatients with a Major Depressive Disorder

How impactful is the use of Sertraline, Fluoxetine, and Escitalopram monotherapy on psychological distress among adults with depression in the real world? Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most commonly prescribed antidepressants. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) longitudinal data files from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2019 (panel 17-23) were used to assess the effects of Sertraline, Fluoxetine and Escitalopram on psychological distress among adult outpatients diagnosed with a major depressive disorder. Participants aged 20-80 years without comorbidities, who initiated antidepressants only at rounds 2 and 3 of each panel, were included. The impact of the medicines on psychological distress was assessed using changes in Kessler Index (K6) scores, which were measured only in rounds 2 and 4 of each panel. Multinomial logistic regression was conducted using the changes in the K6 scores as a dependent variable. A total of 589 participants were included in the study. Overall, 90.79% of the study participants on monotherapy antidepressants reported improved levels of psychological distress. Fluoxetine had the highest improvement rate of 91.87%, followed by Escitalopram (90.38%) and Sertraline (90.27%). The findings on the comparative effectiveness of the three medications were statistically insignificant. Sertraline, Fluoxetine, and Escitalopram were shown to be effective among adult patients suffering from major depressive disorders without comorbid conditions.

Expanding Family Health History to Include Family Medication History

The collection of family health history (FHH) is an essential component of clinical practice and an important piece of data for patient risk assessment. However, family history data have generally been limited to diseases and have not included medication history. Family history was a key component of early pharmacogenetic research, confirming the role of genes in drug response. With the substantial number of known pharmacogenes, many affecting response to commonly prescribed medications, and the availability of clinical pharmacogenetic (PGx) tests and guidelines for interpretation, the collection of family medication history can inform testing decisions. This paper explores the roots of family-based pharmacogenetic studies to confirm the role of genes in these complex phenotypes and the benefits and challenges of collecting family medication history as part of family health history intake.

Treatment-Resistant Depression in a Real-World Setting: First Interim Analysis of Characteristics, Healthcare Resource Use, and Utility Values of the FondaMental Cohort

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is among the most common psychiatric disorders. One-third of patients are usually unresponsive to several lines of treatment. This study aimed to describe the FondaMental French cohort of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and to estimate utility and healthcare resource use outcomes. Methods: Patients with TRD were evaluated prospectively over four years (baseline, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months) in a real-world clinical setting. Interim analyses focused on the first two consecutive years. Four MDD-related states (major depressive episode (MDE), response, remission, recovery) were defined based on the MADRS (Montgomery–Åsberg depression rating scale) and other clinical events. Health status was assessed with the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire. Utility values were estimated as preference measures that the patients assigned to their overall health status. Results: This study was based on 252 patients with TRD. The mean utility value by health state was 0.41, 0.63, 0.80, and 0.90, for MDE, response, remission, and recovery, respectively. At baseline, 59% of patients had an MADRS score of at least 28. Their baseline average utility value was lower compared to the other patients (0.43 versus 0.58, p < 0.001). This significant difference persisted at the following visits. The rate of patients in MDEs having at least one hospitalisation for depression or other reasons than depression was generally higher than that in the other health states. Conclusion: This study documented patterns in healthcare resource consumption, quality of life, and other characteristics in patients with TRD, both globally and by health state and depression severity.

The Impact of Completing Medication Reconciliation and Depression Treatment History in an Outpatient Depression Clinic

OBJECTIVES

To enhance depression care by improving medication information available prior to initial patient consultations.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND SAMPLE

Single-center, with intervention delivered to all new patient referrals at a tertiary care depression clinic. Trained pharmacy students utilizing a standard script prior to the first consultation visit conducted a medication review and depression treatment telephone assessment.

RESULTS

From 225 individuals contacted once by phone in the week prior to scheduled initial consultation, 141 (62.7%) were reached and 113 (50.2%) completed the full phone assessment. An average of 4-5 medication discrepancies were identified per respondent, of which one-third were considered potentially clinically significant and more than 96% of patients having at least one reported discrepancy. Individuals who completed the call were also more likely to attend the initial consultation. In the medical record, 55 of the 106 (51.9%) pharmacy notes were incorporated in the clinical assessment note. On survey, clinicians reported that access to the pharmacy note saved clinician time, with all prescribing clinicians indicating the pharmacy note significantly influenced subsequent medication recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Telephone assessments conducted by pharmacy students prior to an initial depression clinic consultation was associated with higher consultation attendance, identified a large number of medication discrepancies, were successfully reviewed and received by clinicians, potentially saved clinician time, and influenced subsequent medication prescribing.

Patient-reported depression severity and cognitive symptoms as determinants of functioning in patients with major depressive disorder: a secondary analysis of the 2-year prospective PERFORM study

PURPOSE

To investigate the temporal interrelationship between depression severity, cognitive symptoms, and functioning in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) in the PERFORM study (NCT01427439).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PERFORM was a 2-year, multicenter, prospective, noninterventional cohort study in outpatients with MDD who were either initiating antidepressant monotherapy or undergoing their first switch of antidepressant. Patients were enrolled by a general practitioner or psychiatrist. Structural equation model (SEM) analysis was used to explore temporal associations between patient-reported depression severity (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire score), cognitive symptoms (5-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire score), and functional impairment (Sheehan Disability Scale total score). Standardized regression coefficients (SRCs) were used to evaluate the relationship between each outcome and scores from the most recent prior visit over the 2 years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Between February 25, 2011, and February 19, 2015, 1,159 eligible patients with MDD completed the baseline and ≥1 follow-up visit at 194 sites in five European countries (France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, and the UK). Overall, 1,090 patients had assessments for ≥1 outcome measure at two consecutive visits. Severity of cognitive symptoms at baseline and Months 2 and 18 predicted functional impairment at Months 2, 6, and 24, respectively (SRC: 0.18, 0.15, and 0.22; P<0.001). Depression severity at Months 2, 6, and 12 predicted functional impairment at Months 6, 12, and 18, respectively (SRC: 0.17, 0.25, and 0.22; P<0.001). Severity of cognitive symptoms at baseline and Month 18 predicted depression severity at Months 2 and 24, respectively (SRC: 0.19 and 0.22; P<0.001). Functional impairment did not significantly predict the severity of depression or cognitive symptoms, and depression severity did not significantly predict the severity of cognitive symptoms at any time point.

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported severity of cognitive symptoms appears to be an independent and significant determinant of subsequent functional impairment and depression severity in patients with MDD.