Identification of bipolar disorder using a combination of multimodality magnetic resonance imaging and machine learning techniques

Diagnostic value of regional homogeneity and fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in the classification of schizophrenia and bipolar disorders

Schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar disorders (BD) show significant neurobiological and clinical overlap. In this study, we wanted to identify indexes of intrinsic brain activity that could differentiate these disorders. We compared the diagnostic value of the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) and regional homogeneity (ReHo) estimated from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in a support vector machine classification of 59 healthy controls (HC), 40 individuals with SCZ, and 43 individuals with BD type I. The best performance, measured by balanced accuracy (BAC) for binary classification relative to HC was achieved by a stacking model (87.4% and 90.6% for SCZ and BD, respectively), with ReHo performing better than fALFF, both in SCZ (86.2% vs. 79.4%) and BD (89.9% vs. 76.9%). BD were better differentiated from HC by fronto-temporal ReHo and striato-temporo-thalamic fALFF. SCZ were better classified from HC using fronto-temporal-cerebellar ReHo and insulo-tempo-parietal-cerebellar fALFF. In conclusion, we provided evidence of widespread aberrancies of spontaneous activity and local connectivity in SCZ and BD, demonstrating that ReHo features exhibited superior discriminatory power compared to fALFF and achieved higher classification accuracies. Our results support the complementarity of these measures in the classification of SCZ and BD and suggest the potential for multivariate integration to improve diagnostic precision.

Distinguishing schizophrenia and bipolar disorder through a Multiclass Classification model based on multimodal neuroimaging data

This study aimed to identify neural biomarkers for schizophrenia (SZ) and bipolar disorder (BP) by analyzing multimodal neuroimaging. Utilizing data from structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), multiclass classification models were created for SZ, BP, and healthy controls (HC). A total of 113 participants (BP: 31, SZ: 39, and HC: 43) were recruited under strict enrollment control, from which 272, 200, and 1875 features were extracted from sMRI, DTI, and rs-fMRI data, respectively. A support vector machine (SVM) with recursive feature elimination (RFE) was employed to build the models using a one-against-one approach and leave-one-out cross-validation, achieving a classification accuracy of 70.8%. The most discriminative features were primarily from rs-fMRI, along with significant findings in sMRI and DTI. Key biomarkers identified included the increased thickness of the left cuneus cortex and decreased regional functional connectivity strength (rFCS) in the left supramarginal gyrus as shared indicators for BP and SZ. Additionally, decreased fractional anisotropy in the left superior fronto-occipital fasciculus was suggested as specific to BP, while decreased rFCS in the left inferior parietal area might serve as a specific biomarker for SZ. These findings underscore the potential of multimodal neuroimaging in distinguishing between BP and SZ and contribute to the understanding of their neural underpinnings.

Voxel- and tensor-based morphometry with machine learning techniques identifying characteristic brain impairment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Aim

The diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) relies on several methods, including x-rays, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Although MRI is the most useful diagnostic tool, strategies to improve the precise and independent diagnosis of CSM using novel MRI imaging techniques are urgently needed. This study aimed to explore potential brain biomarkers to improve the precise diagnosis of CSM through the combination of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and tensor-based morphometry (TBM) with machine learning techniques.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 57 patients with CSM and 57 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. The structural changes in the gray matter volume and white matter volume were determined by VBM. Gray and white matter deformations were measured by TBM. The support vector machine (SVM) was used for the classification of CSM patients from HCs based on the structural features of VBM and TBM.

Results

CSM patients exhibited characteristic structural abnormalities in the sensorimotor, visual, cognitive, and subcortical regions, as well as in the anterior corona radiata and the corpus callosum [P < 0.05, false discovery rate (FDR) corrected]. A multivariate pattern classification analysis revealed that VBM and TBM could successfully identify CSM patients and HCs [classification accuracy: 81.58%, area under the curve (AUC): 0.85; P < 0.005, Bonferroni corrected] through characteristic gray matter and white matter impairments.

Conclusion

CSM may cause widespread and remote impairments in brain structures. This study provided a valuable reference for developing novel diagnostic strategies to identify CSM.

Multi-feature concatenation and multi-classifier stacking: An interpretable and generalizable machine learning method for MDD discrimination with rsfMRI

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a serious and heterogeneous psychiatric disorder that needs accurate diagnosis. Resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI), which captures multiple perspectives on brain structure, function, and connectivity, is increasingly applied in the diagnosis and pathological research of MDD. Different machine learning algorithms are then developed to exploit the rich information in rsfMRI and discriminate MDD patients from normal controls. Despite recent advances reported, the MDD discrimination accuracy has room for further improvement. The generalizability and interpretability of the discrimination method are not sufficiently addressed either. Here, we propose a machine learning method (MFMC) for MDD discrimination by concatenating multiple features and stacking multiple classifiers. MFMC is tested on the REST-meta-MDD data set that contains 2428 subjects collected from 25 different sites. MFMC yields 96.9% MDD discrimination accuracy, demonstrating a significant improvement over existing methods. In addition, the generalizability of MFMC is validated by the good performance when the training and testing subjects are from independent sites. The use of XGBoost as the meta classifier allows us to probe the decision process of MFMC. We identify 13 feature values related to 9 brain regions including the posterior cingulate gyrus, superior frontal gyrus orbital part, and angular gyrus, which contribute most to the classification and also demonstrate significant differences at the group level. The use of these 13 feature values alone can reach 87% of MFMC's full performance when taking all feature values. These features may serve as clinically useful diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for MDD in the future.

Sampling inequalities affect generalization of neuroimaging-based diagnostic classifiers in psychiatry

BACKGROUND

The development of machine learning models for aiding in the diagnosis of mental disorder is recognized as a significant breakthrough in the field of psychiatry. However, clinical practice of such models remains a challenge, with poor generalizability being a major limitation.

METHODS

Here, we conducted a pre-registered meta-research assessment on neuroimaging-based models in the psychiatric literature, quantitatively examining global and regional sampling issues over recent decades, from a view that has been relatively underexplored. A total of 476 studies (n = 118,137) were included in the current assessment. Based on these findings, we built a comprehensive 5-star rating system to quantitatively evaluate the quality of existing machine learning models for psychiatric diagnoses.

RESULTS

A global sampling inequality in these models was revealed quantitatively (sampling Gini coefficient (G) = 0.81, p < .01), varying across different countries (regions) (e.g., China, G = 0.47; the USA, G = 0.58; Germany, G = 0.78; the UK, G = 0.87). Furthermore, the severity of this sampling inequality was significantly predicted by national economic levels (β =  - 2.75, p < .001, R²_adj = 0.40; r =  - .84, 95% CI: - .41 to - .97), and was plausibly predictable for model performance, with higher sampling inequality for reporting higher classification accuracy. Further analyses showed that lack of independent testing (84.24% of models, 95% CI: 81.0-87.5%), improper cross-validation (51.68% of models, 95% CI: 47.2-56.2%), and poor technical transparency (87.8% of models, 95% CI: 84.9-90.8%)/availability (80.88% of models, 95% CI: 77.3-84.4%) are prevailing in current diagnostic classifiers despite improvements over time. Relating to these observations, model performances were found decreased in studies with independent cross-country sampling validations (all p < .001, BF₁₀ > 15). In light of this, we proposed a purpose-built quantitative assessment checklist, which demonstrated that the overall ratings of these models increased by publication year but were negatively associated with model performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, improving sampling economic equality and hence the quality of machine learning models may be a crucial facet to plausibly translating neuroimaging-based diagnostic classifiers into clinical practice.

Decreased dorsal attention network homogeneity as a potential neuroimaging biomarker for major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Gaining insight into abnormal functional brain network homogeneity (NH) has the potential to aid efforts to target or otherwise study major depressive disorder (MDD). The NH of the dorsal attention network (DAN) in first-episode treatment-naive MDD patients, however, has yet to be studied. As such, the present study was developed to explore the NH of the DAN in order to determine the ability of this parameter to differentiate between MDD patients and healthy control (HC) individuals.

METHODS

This study included 73 patients with first-episode treatment-naive MDD and 73 age-, gender-, and educational level-matched healthy controls. All participants completed the attentional network test (ANT), Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) analyses. A group independent component analysis (ICA) was used to identify the DAN and to compute the NH of the DAN in patients with MDD. Spearman's rank correlation analyses were used to explore relationships between significant NH abnormalities in MDD patients, clinical parameters, and executive control reaction time.

RESULTS

Relative to HCs, patients exhibited reduced NH in the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG). Support vector machine (SVM) analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves indicated that the NH of the left SMG could be used to differentiate between HCs and MDD patients with respective accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and AUC values of 92.47 %, 91.78 %, 93.15 %, and 65.39 %. A significant positive correlation was observed between the left SMG NH values and HRSD scores among MDD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that NH changes in the DAN may offer value as a neuroimaging biomarker capable of differentiating between MDD patients and healthy individuals.

Emotion regulation in bipolar disorder type-I: multivariate analysis of fMRI data

BACKGROUND

Bipolar disorder type-I (BD-I) patients are known to show emotion regulation abnormalities. In a previous fMRI study using an explicit emotion regulation paradigm, we compared responses from 19 BD-I patients and 17 matched healthy controls (HC). A standard general linear model-based univariate analysis revealed that BD patients showed increased activations in inferior frontal gyrus when instructed to decrease their emotional response as elicited by neutral images. We implemented multivariate pattern recognition analyses on the same data to examine if we could classify conditions within-group as well as HC versus BD.

METHODS

We reanalyzed explicit emotion regulation data using a multivariate pattern recognition approach, as implemented in PRONTO software. The original experimental paradigm consisted of a full 2 × 2 factorial design, with valence (Negative/Neutral) and instruction (Look/Decrease) as within subject factors.

RESULTS

The multivariate models were able to accurately classify different task conditions when HC and BD were analyzed separately (63.24%-75.00%, p = 0.001-0.012). In addition, the models were able to correctly classify HC versus BD with significant accuracy in conditions where subjects were instructed to downregulate their felt emotion (59.60%-60.84%, p = 0.014-0.018). The results for HC versus BD classification demonstrated contributions from the salience network, several occipital and frontal regions, inferior parietal lobes, as well as other cortical regions, to achieve above-chance classifications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multivariate analysis successfully reproduced some of the main results obtained in the previous univariate analysis, confirming that these findings are not dependent on the analysis approach. In particular, both types of analyses suggest that there is a significant difference of neural patterns between conditions within each subject group. The multivariate approach also revealed that reappraisal conditions provide the most informative activity for differentiating HC versus BD, irrespective of emotional valence (negative or neutral). The current results illustrate the importance of investigating the cognitive control of emotion in BD. We also propose a set of candidate regions for further study of emotional control in BD.

Evaluation of Risk of Bias in Neuroimaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Neuroimaging-based artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic models have proliferated in psychiatry. However, their clinical applicability and reporting quality (ie, feasibility) for clinical practice have not been systematically evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the risk of bias (ROB) and reporting quality of neuroimaging-based AI models for psychiatric diagnosis.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

PubMed was searched for peer-reviewed, full-length articles published between January 1, 1990, and March 16, 2022. Studies aimed at developing or validating neuroimaging-based AI models for clinical diagnosis of psychiatric disorders were included. Reference lists were further searched for suitable original studies. Data extraction followed the CHARMS (Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. A closed-loop cross-sequential design was used for quality control. The PROBAST (Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool) and modified CLEAR (Checklist for Evaluation of Image-Based Artificial Intelligence Reports) benchmarks were used to systematically evaluate ROB and reporting quality.

FINDINGS

A total of 517 studies presenting 555 AI models were included and evaluated. Of these models, 461 (83.1%; 95% CI, 80.0%-86.2%) were rated as having a high overall ROB based on the PROBAST. The ROB was particular high in the analysis domain, including inadequate sample size (398 of 555 models [71.7%; 95% CI, 68.0%-75.6%]), poor model performance examination (with 100% of models lacking calibration examination), and lack of handling data complexity (550 of 555 models [99.1%; 95% CI, 98.3%-99.9%]). None of the AI models was perceived to be applicable to clinical practices. Overall reporting completeness (ie, number of reported items/number of total items) for the AI models was 61.2% (95% CI, 60.6%-61.8%), and the completeness was poorest for the technical assessment domain with 39.9% (95% CI, 38.8%-41.1%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This systematic review found that the clinical applicability and feasibility of neuroimaging-based AI models for psychiatric diagnosis were challenged by a high ROB and poor reporting quality. Particularly in the analysis domain, ROB in AI diagnostic models should be addressed before clinical application.

A Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches on Mental Health Diagnosis

Combating mental illnesses such as depression and anxiety has become a global concern. As a result of the necessity for finding effective ways to battle these problems, machine learning approaches have been included in healthcare systems for the diagnosis and probable prediction of the treatment outcomes of mental health conditions. With the growing interest in machine and deep learning methods, analysis of existing work to guide future research directions is necessary. In this study, 33 articles on the diagnosis of schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anorexia nervosa, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) were retrieved from various search databases using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) review methodology. These publications were chosen based on their use of machine learning and deep learning technologies, individually assessed, and their recommended methodologies were then classified into the various disorders included in this study. In addition, the difficulties encountered by the researchers are discussed, and a list of some public datasets is provided.

Identification of chronic mild traumatic brain injury using resting state functional MRI and machine learning techniques

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a major public health concern that can result in a broad spectrum of short-term and long-term symptoms. Recently, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been used in neuroscience research for diagnostics and prognostic assessment of brain disorders. The present study aimed to develop an automatic classifier to distinguish patients suffering from chronic mTBI from healthy controls (HCs) utilizing multilevel metrics of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Sixty mTBI patients and forty HCs were enrolled and allocated to training and testing datasets with a ratio of 80:20. Several rs-fMRI metrics including fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), degree centrality (DC), voxel-mirrored homotopic connectivity (VMHC), functional connectivity strength (FCS), and seed-based FC were generated from two main analytical categories: local measures and network measures. Statistical two-sample t-test was employed comparing between mTBI and HCs groups. Then, for each rs-fMRI metric the features were selected extracting the mean values from the clusters showing significant differences. Finally, the support vector machine (SVM) models based on separate and multilevel metrics were built and the performance of the classifiers were assessed using five-fold cross-validation and via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Feature importance was estimated using Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values. Among local measures, the range of AUC was 86.67-100% and the optimal SVM model was obtained based on combined multilevel rs-fMRI metrics and DC as a separate model with AUC of 100%. Among network measures, the range of AUC was 80.42-93.33% and the optimal SVM model was obtained based on the combined multilevel seed-based FC metrics. The SHAP analysis revealed the DC value in the left postcentral and seed-based FC value between the motor ventral network and right superior temporal as the most important local and network features with the greatest contribution to the classification models. Our findings demonstrated that different rs-fMRI metrics can provide complementary information for classifying patients suffering from chronic mTBI. Moreover, we showed that ML approach is a promising tool for detecting patients with mTBI and might serve as potential imaging biomarker to identify patients at individual level.

Clinical trial registration

[clinicaltrials.gov], identifier [NCT03241732].

Functional and structural brain differences in bipolar disorder: a multimodal meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies of resting-state functional imaging and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) have revealed differences in specific brain regions of patients with bipolar disorder (BD), but the results have been inconsistent.

METHODS

A whole-brain voxel-wise meta-analysis was conducted on resting-state functional imaging and VBM studies that compared differences between patients with BD and healthy controls using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images software.

RESULTS

A systematic literature search identified 51 functional imaging studies (1842 BD and 2190 controls) and 83 VBM studies (2790 BD and 3690 controls). Overall, patients with BD displayed increased resting-state functional activity in the left middle frontal gyrus, right inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) extending to the right insula, right superior frontal gyrus and bilateral striatum, as well as decreased resting-state functional activity in the left middle temporal gyrus extending to the left superior temporal gyrus and post-central gyrus, left cerebellum, and bilateral precuneus. The meta-analysis of VBM showed that patients with BD displayed decreased VBM in the right IFG extending to the right insula, temporal pole and superior temporal gyrus, left superior temporal gyrus extending to the left insula, temporal pole, and IFG, anterior cingulate cortex, left superior frontal gyrus (medial prefrontal cortex), left thalamus, and right fusiform gyrus.

CONCLUSIONS

The multimodal meta-analyses suggested that BD showed similar patterns of aberrant brain activity and structure in the insula extending to the temporal cortex, fronto-striatal-thalamic, and default-mode network regions, which provide useful insights for understanding the underlying pathophysiology of BD.

Exploring neurometabolic alterations in bipolar disorder with suicidal ideation based on proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and machine learning technology

Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with a high risk of suicide. We used proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) to detect biochemical metabolite ratios in the bilateral prefrontal white matter (PWM) and hippocampus in 32 BD patients with suicidal ideation (SI) and 18 BD patients without SI, identified potential brain biochemical differences and used abnormal metabolite ratios to predict the severity of suicide risk based on the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. Furthermore, we analyzed the correlations between biochemical metabolites and clinical variables in BD patients with SI. There were three main findings: (1) the highest classification accuracy of 88% and an area under the curve of 0.9 were achieved in distinguishing BD patients with and without SI, with N-acetyl aspartate (NAA)/creatine (Cr), myo-inositol (mI)/Cr values in the bilateral PWM, NAA/Cr and choline (Cho)/Cr values in the left hippocampus, and Cho/Cr values in the right hippocampus being the features contributing the most; (2) the above seven features could be used to predict Self-rating Idea of Suicide Scale scores (r = 0.4261, p = 0.0302); and (3) the level of neuronal function in the left hippocampus may be related to the duration of illness, the level of membrane phospholipid catabolism in the left hippocampus may be related to the severity of depression, and the level of inositol metabolism in the left PWM may be related to the age of onset in BD patients with SI. Our results showed that the combination of multiple brain biochemical metabolites could better predict the risk and severity of suicide in patients with BD and that there was a significant correlation between biochemical metabolic values and clinical variables in BD patients with SI.

Machine learning approaches for prediction of bipolar disorder based on biological, clinical and neuropsychological markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Applying machine learning (ML) to objective markers may overcome prognosis uncertainty due to the subjective nature of the diagnosis of bipolar disorder (BD). This PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis provides new systematic evidence of the BD classification accuracy reached by different markers and ML algorithms. We focused on neuroimaging, electrophysiological techniques, peripheral biomarkers, genetic data, neuropsychological or clinical measures, and multimodal approaches. PubMed, Embase and Scopus were searched through 3^rd December 2020. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effect models. Overall, 81 studies were included in this systematic review and 65 in the meta-analysis (11,336 participants, 3,903 BD). The overall pooled classification accuracy was 0.77 (95%CI[0.75;0.80]). Despite subgroup analyses for diagnostic comparison group, psychiatric disorders, marker, ML algorithm, and validation procedure were not significant, linear discriminant analysis significantly outperformed support vector machine for peripheral biomarkers (p=0.03). Sample size was inversely related to accuracy. Evidence of publication bias was detected. Ultimately, although ML reached a high accuracy in differentiating BD from other psychiatric disorders, best practices in methodology are needed for the advancement of future studies.

Distinguish bipolar and major depressive disorder in adolescents based on multimodal neuroimaging: Results from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study®

Background

Major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder in adolescents are prevalent and are associated with cognitive impairment, executive dysfunction, and increased mortality. Early intervention in the initial stages of major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder can significantly improve personal health.

Methods

We collected 309 samples from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study, including 116 adolescents with bipolar disorder, 64 adolescents with major depressive disorder, and 129 healthy adolescents, and employed a support vector machine to develop classification models for identification. We developed a multimodal model, which combined functional connectivity of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and four anatomical measures of structural magnetic resonance imaging (cortical thickness, area, volume, and sulcal depth). We measured the performances of both multimodal and single modality classifiers.

Results

The multimodal classifiers showed outstanding performance compared with all five single modalities, and they are 100% for major depressive disorder versus healthy controls, 100% for bipolar disorder versus healthy control, 98.5% (95% CI: 95.4–100%) for major depressive disorder versus bipolar disorder, 100% for major depressive disorder versus depressed bipolar disorder and the leave-one-site-out analysis results are 77.4%, 63.3%, 79.4%, and 81.7%, separately.

Conclusions

The study shows that multimodal classifiers show high classification performances. Moreover, cuneus may be a potential biomarker to differentiate major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and healthy adolescents. Overall, this study can form multimodal diagnostic prediction workflows for clinically feasible to make more precise diagnose at the early stage and potentially reduce loss of personal pain and public society.

The Role of Machine Learning in Diagnosing Bipolar Disorder: Scoping Review

Background

Bipolar disorder (BD) is the 10th most common cause of frailty in young individuals and has triggered morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients with BD have a life expectancy 9 to 17 years lower than that of normal people. BD is a predominant mental disorder, but it can be misdiagnosed as depressive disorder, which leads to difficulties in treating affected patients. Approximately 60% of patients with BD are treated for depression. However, machine learning provides advanced skills and techniques for better diagnosis of BD.

Objective

This review aims to explore the machine learning algorithms used for the detection and diagnosis of bipolar disorder and its subtypes.

Methods

The study protocol adopted the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We explored 3 databases, namely Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and PubMed. To enhance the search, we performed backward screening of all the references of the included studies. Based on the predefined selection criteria, 2 levels of screening were performed: title and abstract review, and full review of the articles that met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed independently by all investigators. To synthesize the extracted data, a narrative synthesis approach was followed.

Results

We retrieved 573 potential articles were from the 3 databases. After preprocessing and screening, only 33 articles that met our inclusion criteria were identified. The most commonly used data belonged to the clinical category (19, 58%). We identified different machine learning models used in the selected studies, including classification models (18, 55%), regression models (5, 16%), model-based clustering methods (2, 6%), natural language processing (1, 3%), clustering algorithms (1, 3%), and deep learning–based models (3, 9%). Magnetic resonance imaging data were most commonly used for classifying bipolar patients compared to other groups (11, 34%), whereas microarray expression data sets and genomic data were the least commonly used. The maximum ratio of accuracy was 98%, whereas the minimum accuracy range was 64%.

Conclusions

This scoping review provides an overview of recent studies based on machine learning models used to diagnose patients with BD regardless of their demographics or if they were compared to patients with psychiatric diagnoses. Further research can be conducted to provide clinical decision support in the health industry.

The Role of Machine Learning in Diagnosing Bipolar Disorder: Scoping Review (Preprint).. [DOI: 10.2196/preprints.29749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

BACKGROUND

Bipolar disorder (BD) is the 10th most common cause of frailty in young individuals and has triggered morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients with BD have a life expectancy 9 to 17 years lower than that of normal people. BD is a predominant mental disorder, but it can be misdiagnosed as depressive disorder, which leads to difficulties in treating affected patients. Approximately 60% of patients with BD are treated for depression. However, machine learning provides advanced skills and techniques for better diagnosis of BD.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to explore the machine learning algorithms used for the detection and diagnosis of bipolar disorder and its subtypes.

METHODS

The study protocol adopted the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. We explored 3 databases, namely Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and PubMed. To enhance the search, we performed backward screening of all the references of the included studies. Based on the predefined selection criteria, 2 levels of screening were performed: title and abstract review, and full review of the articles that met the inclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed independently by all investigators. To synthesize the extracted data, a narrative synthesis approach was followed.

RESULTS

We retrieved 573 potential articles were from the 3 databases. After preprocessing and screening, only 33 articles that met our inclusion criteria were identified. The most commonly used data belonged to the clinical category (19, 58%). We identified different machine learning models used in the selected studies, including classification models (18, 55%), regression models (5, 16%), model-based clustering methods (2, 6%), natural language processing (1, 3%), clustering algorithms (1, 3%), and deep learning–based models (3, 9%). Magnetic resonance imaging data were most commonly used for classifying bipolar patients compared to other groups (11, 34%), whereas microarray expression data sets and genomic data were the least commonly used. The maximum ratio of accuracy was 98%, whereas the minimum accuracy range was 64%.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review provides an overview of recent studies based on machine learning models used to diagnose patients with BD regardless of their demographics or if they were compared to patients with psychiatric diagnoses. Further research can be conducted to provide clinical decision support in the health industry.

Clinicians' views on neuromodulation as a treatment for eating disorders: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Neuromodulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS), are emerging as promising treatment options in eating disorders (EDs). To date, the views of ED clinicians regarding these interventions have not been explored.

METHODS

Eighteen clinicians were recruited from a specialist ED Service in London, UK. Following a short educational presentation on rTMS, tDCS and DBS, they completed a semi-structured interview to explore their views on the use of these treatment options in EDs.

RESULTS

Clinician knowledge of neuromodulation techniques was low. They raised safety and ethical (particularly capacity to consent) concerns mainly with regard to DBS. Neuromodulation treatments were considered most appropriate as an adjunct to psychotherapy and for patients with severe, enduring illness (who had completed previous psychological treatments).

CONCLUSIONS

Improving clinicians' knowledge and understanding of neuromodulation is fundamental for bridging the gap between research and clinical work. This is especially so given the predominance of psychological theory and practice in the treatment of EDs.