Adequacy of prenatal care among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study

Receipt of adequate prenatal care for privately sponsored versus government-assisted refugees in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Canada has 2 main streams of resettlement: government-assisted refugees and privately sponsored refugees, whereby citizens can privately sponsor refugees and provide resettlement services, including health care navigation. Our objective was to compare receipt of adequate prenatal care among privately sponsored and government-assisted refugees.

METHODS

This population-based study used linked health administrative and demographic databases. We included all resettled refugees classified as female who landed in Ontario, Canada, between April 2002 and May 2017, and who had a live birth or stillbirth conceived at least 365 days after their landing date. Our primary outcome - adequacy of prenatal care - was a composite that comprised receipt of a first-trimester prenatal visit, the number of prenatal care visits recommended by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada and a prenatal fetal anatomy ultrasound. We accounted for potential confounding with inverse probability of treatment weighting, using a propensity score.

RESULTS

We included 2775 government-assisted and 2374 privately sponsored refugees. Compared with privately sponsored refugees (62.3% v. 69.3%), government-assisted refugees received adequate prenatal care less often, with a weighted relative risk of 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.88-0.95).

INTERPRETATION

Among refugees resettled to Canada, a government-assisted resettlement model was associated with receiving less adequate prenatal care than a private sponsorship model. Government-assisted refugees may benefit from additional support in navigating health care beyond the first year after arrival.

Equitable Timing of HIV Diagnosis Prior to Pregnancy: A Canadian Perspective

Initiating antiretrovirals prior to conception leads to a negligible risk of perinatal transmission. This study aimed to determine the timing of HIV diagnosis among pregnant women with HIV in Ontario. A retrospective population-level cohort study using linked health administrative databases was conducted to establish maternal HIV status and timing of HIV diagnosis of all women living with HIV who gave birth in 2006-2018. The majority of the 1012 women living with HIV who gave birth in Ontario were diagnosed prior to pregnancy (87.9%); however, many were not (12.1%). Among those diagnosed during pregnancy, only 23% were diagnosed in the first trimester. While HIV screening tests are being well directed towards young women, several women still enter pregnancy undiagnosed and are not diagnosed early. This calls for a continuous effort to promote universal pre-conception screening and to use HIV point-of-care testing for at-risk pregnant women and those presenting late to prenatal care.

Quality of Antenatal Care for Women Who Experience Imprisonment in Ontario, Canada

IMPORTANCE

Women who experience imprisonment have high morbidity and an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Antenatal care could modify pregnancy-related risks, but there is a lack of evidence regarding antenatal care in this population.

OBJECTIVES

To examine antenatal care quality indicators for women who experience imprisonment and to compare these data with data for the general population.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This population-based, retrospective cohort study used linked correctional and health administrative data from women released from provincial prison in Ontario, Canada, in 2010 and women in the general population with deliveries at 20 weeks' gestation or greater from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2017, to May 4, 2020.

EXPOSURES

Pregnancies in women with time in prison during pregnancy (prison pregnancies), pregnancies in women with time in prison but not while pregnant (prison control pregnancies), and pregnancies in women in the general population (general population pregnancies).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Antenatal care quality indicators: first-trimester visit, first-trimester ultrasonography, and 8 or more antenatal care visits.

RESULTS

A total of 626 prison pregnancies in 529 women (mean [SD] age, 26.6 [5.4] years), 2327 prison control pregnancies in 1570 women (mean [SD] age, 26.2 [5.4] years), and 1 308 879 general population pregnancies in 884 063 women (mean [SD] age, 30.3 [5.3] years) were studied. Of 626 prison pregnancies, 193 women (30.8%; 95% CI, 27.1%-34.6%) had a first-trimester visit, 272 (48.4%; 95% CI, 44.4%-52.4%) had at least 8 antenatal care visits, and 209 (34.6%; 95% CI, 31.0%-38.4%) received first-trimester ultrasonography. In 2327 prison control pregnancies, 1106 women (47.5%; 95% CI, 45.3%-49.8%) had a first-trimester visit, 1356 (59.2%; 95% CI, 56.9%-61.4%) had 8 or more antenatal care visits, and 893 (38.5%; 95% CI, 36.4%-40.6%) received first-trimester ultrasonography. Compared with 1 308 879 general population pregnancies, the odds of antenatal care were lower for the first-trimester visit (odds ratios [ORs], 0.11 [95% CI, 0.09-0.13] in prison pregnancies and 0.23 [95% CI, 0.21-0.25] in prison control pregnancies), 8 or more antenatal care visits (ORs, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.14-0.19] in prison pregnancies and 0.25 [95% CI, 0.23-0.28] in prison control pregnancies), and first-trimester ultrasonography (ORs, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.36-0.50] in prison pregnancies and 0.51 [95% CI, 0.46-0.55] in prison control pregnancies).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study found that women who experienced imprisonment were substantially less likely to receive adequate antenatal care than were women in the general population whether or not they were in prison during pregnancy. Efforts are needed to improve antenatal care for this population both in prison and in the community.

Point-of-care HIV viral load in pregnant women without prenatal care: a cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Routine cesarean delivery has been shown to decrease mother-to-child-transmission of HIV in women with high viral load greater than 1000 copies/mL; however, women presenting late in pregnancy may not have viral load results before delivery.

OBJECTIVE

Our study investigated the costs and outcomes of using a point-of-care HIV RNA viral load test to guide delivery compared with routine cesarean delivery for all in the setting of unknown viral load.

STUDY DESIGN

A decision-analytic model was constructed using TreeAge software to compare HIV RNA viral load testing vs routine cesarean delivery for all in a theoretical cohort of 1275 HIV-positive women without prenatal care who presented at term for delivery, the estimated population of HIV-positive women without prenatal care in the United States annually. TreeAge Pro software is used to build decision trees modeling clinical problems and perform cost-effectiveness, sensitivity, and simulation analysis to identify the optimal outcome. The average cost per test was $15.22. To examine the downstream impact of a cesarean delivery and because most childbearing women in the United States will deliver 2 children, we incorporated a second pregnancy and delivery in the model. Primary outcomes were mother-to-child transmission, delivery mode, cesarean delivery-related complications, cost, and quality-adjusted life years. Model inputs were derived from the literature and varied in sensitivity analyses. The cost-effectiveness threshold was $100,000/quality-adjusted life year.

RESULTS

Measuring viral load resulted in more HIV-infected neonates than routine cesarean delivery for all due to viral exposure during more frequent vaginal births in this strategy. There were no observed maternal deaths or differences in cesarean delivery-related complications. Quantifying viral load increased cost by $3,883,371 and decreased quality-adjusted life years by 63 compared with routine cesarean delivery for all. With the threshold set at $100,000/quality-adjusted life year, the viral load test is cost-effective only when the vertical transmission rate in women with high viral load was below 0.68% (baseline: 16.8%) and when the odds ratio of vertical transmission with routine cesarean delivery for all compared with vaginal delivery was above 0.885 (baseline: 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

For HIV-infected pregnant women without prenatal care, quantifying viral load to guide mode of delivery using a point-of-care test resulted in increased costs and decreased effectiveness when compared with routine cesarean delivery for all, even after including downstream complications of cesarean delivery.

Migrant women living with HIV in Europe: are they facing inequalities in the prevention of mother-to-child-transmission of HIV?: The European Pregnancy and Paediatric HIV Cohort Collaboration (EPPICC) study group in EuroCoord

Background

In pregnancy early interventions are recommended for prevention of mother-to-child-transmission (PMTCT) of HIV. We examined whether pregnant women who live with HIV in Europe and are migrants encounter barriers in accessing HIV testing and care.

Methods

Four cohorts within the European Pregnancy and Paediatric HIV Cohort Collaboration provided data for pooled analysis of 11 795 pregnant women who delivered in 2002-12 across ten European countries. We defined a migrant as a woman delivering in a country different from her country of birth and grouped the countries into seven world regions. We compared three suboptimal PMTCT interventions (HIV diagnosis in late pregnancy in women undiagnosed at conception, late anti-retroviral therapy (ART) start in women diagnosed but untreated at conception and detectable viral load (VL) at delivery in women on antenatal ART) in native and migrant women using multivariable logistic regression models.

Results

Data included 9421 (79.9%) migrant women, mainly from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA); 4134 migrant women were diagnosed in the current pregnancy, often (48.6%) presenting with CD4 count <350 cells/µl. Being a migrant was associated with HIV diagnosis in late pregnancy [OR for SSA vs. native women, 2.12 (95% CI 1.67, 2.69)] but not with late ART start if diagnosed but not on ART at conception, or with detectable VL at delivery once on ART.

Conclusions

Migrant women were more likely to be diagnosed in late pregnancy but once on ART virological response was good. Good access to antenatal care enables the implementation of PMTCT protocols and optimises both maternal and children health outcomes generally.

Comprehensive nationwide analysis of mother-to-child HIV transmission in Finland from 1983 to 2013

HIV-positive children are still born in Europe despite low mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) rates. We aimed to clarify the remaining barriers to the prevention of MTCT. By combining the national registers, we identified all women living with HIV delivering at least one child during 1983-2013. Of the 212 women delivering after HIV diagnosis, 46% were diagnosed during the pregnancy. In multivariate analysis, age >30 years (P = 0.001), sexual transmission (P = 0.012), living outside of the metropolitan area (P = 0.001) and Eastern European origin (P = 0.043) were risk factors for missed diagnosis before pregnancy. The proportion of immigrants increased from 18% before 1999 to 75% during 2011-2013 (P < 0.001). They were diagnosed during the pregnancy equally to natives and achieved similar, good treatment results. No MTCT occurred when the mother was diagnosed before the delivery. In addition, 12 women had delivered in 2 years prior their HIV diagnosis, most before implementation of the national screening of pregnant women. Three of these children were infected, the last one in 2000. Our data demonstrate that complete elimination of MTCT is feasible in a high-income, low-prevalence country. This requires ongoing universal screening in early pregnancy and easy access to antiretroviral therapy to all HIV-positive people.

Pregnant with HIV before age 25: data from a large national study in Italy, 2001-2016

Young pregnant women with HIV may be at significant risk of unplanned pregnancy, lower treatment coverage, and other adverse pregnancy outcomes. In a large cohort of pregnant women with HIV in Italy, among 2979 pregnancies followed in 2001-2016, 9·0% were in women <25 years, with a significant increase over time (2001-2005: 7·0%; 2006-2010: 9·1%; 2011-2016: 12·2%, P < 0·001). Younger women had a lower rate of planned pregnancy (23·2% vs. 37·7%, odds ratio (OR) 0·50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0·36-0·69), were more frequently diagnosed with HIV in pregnancy (46·5% vs. 20·9%, OR 3·29, 95% CI 2·54-4·25), and, if already diagnosed with HIV before pregnancy, were less frequently on antiretroviral treatment at conception (<25 years: 56·3%; ⩾25 years: 69·0%, OR 0·58, 95% CI 0·41-0·81). During pregnancy, treatment coverage was almost universal in both age groups (98·5% vs. 99·3%), with no differences in rate of HIV viral suppression at third trimester and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The data show that young women represent a growing proportion of pregnant women with HIV, and are significantly more likely to have unplanned pregnancy, undiagnosed HIV infection, and lower treatment coverage at conception. During pregnancy, antiretroviral treatment, HIV suppression, and pregnancy outcomes are similar compared with older women. Earlier intervention strategies may provide additional benefits in the quality of care for women with HIV.

Measuring antenatal care use in Europe: is the content and timing of care in pregnancy tool applicable?

OBJECTIVES

Measuring of antenatal care utilisation is important from a public health perspective. The Content and Timing of care in Pregnancy tool (CTP) focuses on the care process and includes aspects on quality of care. The aim of the study is to gain insight in the applicability of the CTP tool across Europe.

METHODS

National guidelines for routine antenatal care were examined, analysing the degree to which the four items in the CTP tool were included in these guidelines.

RESULTS

From the 30 countries, 22 had a national guideline for routine antenatal care. The CTP tool is applicable in over 60% of the European countries with a national guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

The CTP tool can be used to measure antenatal care delivery in Europe. The tool is useful to evaluate the care process, focusing on rates of interventions as the closest approximation to the delivery of health care, with a focus on content of visits rather than simply the number of visits. Together with indicators measuring structure and outcome of health care, conclusions about the quality of care can be made.