Pre-vaccine era cervical human papillomavirus infection among screening population of women in west Austria

Is an oropharyngeal HPV infection more frequently detectable in women with a genital HPV infection?

PURPOSE

If not eliminated by the immune system and persisting over years, oropharyngeal high-risk HPV infection can lead to cancer development in the oropharynx. HPV infection is very commonly found in the genital region and can serve as an HPV reservoir. In this study, we investigate whether women with a genital HPV infection are at a higher risk of harboring an undetected oropharyngeal HPV infection via genital-oropharyngeal transmission.

METHODS

Women presenting for routine gynecological checkups were included in this study. All participants received an HPV brush test from the genital region as well as from the oropharynx. Additionally, probable risk factors for an HPV infection were assessed in a structured questionnaire.

RESULTS

142 women were included in this study. The rate of oropharyngeal HPV infection was low with 2/142 (1,4%) women positive for a low-risk HPV genotype. In the genital brush test, 54/142 (38%) women were tested HPV positive of which 41/142 (29%) were positive for a high-risk HPV genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of an oropharyngeal HPV detection in our population was low with 2/142 women harboring a low-risk HPV infection.

Detection of 14 High-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Genotypes Within the Italian Cervical Cancer Screening

BACKGROUND/AIM

The identification of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR HPV) genotypes is important both for epidemiological purposes and because the persistence of an HPV infection with the same genotype is a necessary condition for the development of cervical cancer. The purpose of this study was to analyze the prevalence of HR HPV genotypes in women enrolled in the national program for cervical cancer screening in Lazio Region, Italy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From April to November 2022, we evaluated 30,445 samples using the Anyplex TM II HPV HR Detection test (Seegene), which identifies 14 HR HPV: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68. The data were analyzed using the SG STATS platform.

RESULTS

In total, 4,244 samples tested positive (13.9%); 3,290 samples (77.5%) were positive for one of the genotypes tested, and 954 (22.5%) were positive for more than one HPV genotype. The total prevalence (considering both single infection and co-infections) of the different genotypes was: HPV 16 755 cases (13.8%), HPV 31 704 (12.9%), HPV 68 580 (10.6%), HPV 66 436 (8.0%), HPV 52 413 (7.5%), HPV 58 411 (7.5%), HPV 51 400 (7.3%), HPV 56 366 (6.7%), HPV 39 293 (5.3%), HPV 59 260 (4.8%), HPV 45 231 (4.2%), HPV 33 230 (4.2%), HPV 18 222 (4.0%), HPV 35 173 (3.2%). Our results indicate that HPV 16 and 31 are the most prevalent genotypes in the Lazio region followed by HPV 68, 66, 52, 58, and 51.

CONCLUSION

The extended genotyping test allows a better risk stratification and the identification of multiple HPV infections.

Reducing overtreatment associated with overdiagnosis in cervical cancer screening-A model-based benefit-harm analysis for Austria

A general concern exists that cervical cancer screening using human papillomavirus (HPV) testing may lead to considerable overtreatment. We evaluated the trade-off between benefits and overtreatment among different screening strategies differing by primary tests (cytology, p16/Ki-67, HPV alone or in combinations), interval, age and diagnostic follow-up algorithms. A Markov state-transition model calibrated to the Austrian epidemiological context was used to predict cervical cancer cases, deaths, overtreatments and incremental harm-benefit ratios (IHBR) for each strategy. When considering the same screening interval, HPV-based screening strategies were more effective compared to cytology or p16/Ki-67 testing (e.g., relative reduction in cervical cancer with biennial screening: 67.7% for HPV + Pap cotesting, 57.3% for cytology and 65.5% for p16/Ki-67), but were associated with increased overtreatment (e.g., 19.8% more conizations with biennial HPV + Papcotesting vs. biennial cytology). The IHBRs measured in unnecessary conizations per additional prevented cancer-related death were 31 (quinquennial Pap + p16/Ki-67-triage), 49 (triennial Pap + p16/Ki-67-triage), 58 (triennial HPV + Pap cotesting), 66 (biennial HPV + Pap cotesting), 189 (annual Pap + p16/Ki-67-triage) and 401 (annual p16/Ki-67 testing alone). The IHBRs increased significantly with increasing screening adherence rates and slightly with lower age at screening initiation, with a reduction in HPV incidence or with lower Pap-test sensitivity. Depending on the accepted IHBR threshold, biennial or triennial HPV-based screening in women as of age 30 and biennial cytology in younger women may be considered in opportunistic screening settings with low or moderate adherence such as in Austria. In organized settings with high screening adherence and in postvaccination settings with lower HPV prevalence, the interval may be prolonged.

Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Europe: The Transition Towards HPV Vaccination and Population-Based HPV Testing

Cervical cancer is the fourth most frequently occurring cancer in women around the world and can affect them during their reproductive years. Since the development of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test, screening has been essential in identifying cervical cancer at a treatable stage. With the identification of the human papillomavirus (HPV) as the causative agent of essentially all cervical cancer cases, HPV molecular screening tests and HPV vaccines for primary prevention against the virus have been developed. Accordingly, comparative studies were designed to assess the performance of cervical cancer screening methods in order to devise the best screening strategy possible. This review critically assesses the current cervical cancer screening methods as well as the implementation of HPV vaccination in Europe. The most recent European Guidelines and recommendations for organized population-based programs with HPV testing as the primary screening method are also presented. Lastly, the current landscape of cervical cancer screening programs is assessed for both European Union member states and some associated countries, in regard to the transition towards population-based screening programs with primary HPV testing.

Clinical validation of REALQUALITY RQ-HPV Screen according to the international guidelines for human papillomavirus DNA test requirements for cervical screening

Background

According to international guidelines, HPV DNA tests represent a valid alternative to Pap Test for primary cervical cancer screening, provided that they guarantee balanced clinical sensitivity and specificity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe lesions. The aim of this study was to assess whether REALQUALITY RQ-HPV Screen, a new assay based on real time PCR that targets the E6-E7 region of 14 high-risk human papillomaviruses, meets the criteria for primary cervical cancer screening.

Methods

As required by guidelines, a non-inferiority test was conducted to compare the clinical performance of the test under evaluation with that of a clinically validated reference test (Hybrid Capture 2, HC2). The reproducibility of the device was assessed as well. The clinical samples used to test the hypothesis of non-inferiority and to asses reproducibility comprised 910 and 536 cervical specimens respectively. All specimens were originating from a population-based screening cohort.

Results

The study demonstrates that both the clinical sensitivity and specificity of REALQUALITY RQ-HPV Screen are non-inferior to those of HC2. In addition, an adequate intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility has been reached by the test.

Conclusions

REALQUALITY RQ-HPV Screen fulfils all the requirements of the international guidelines and can be considered clinically validated for primary cervical cancer screening purposes.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Genital Human Papillomavirus Infections Among Women in Southwest Nigeria

There is a great variation in the prevalence of cervical HPV infection worldwide with some of the highest rates being found in African women. Early onset of sexual activity (≤ 15 age), multiparity and sexual promiscuity have been recognized as some of the significant risk factors for HPV infection. In Nigeria, there is scarcity of data on the degree of relationship between these factors and the prevalence of HPV infection. Thus, this study was designed to determine the prevalence of genital HPV infection with its potential risk factors among women in Southwest Nigeria. Cervical swab specimen was collected from 295 consenting women including those presenting for routine cervical cancer screening, STI clinic attendees and women who attended community based outreach programmes. Viral DNA was extracted from the swab samples using commercially available DNA extraction Kit and amplified by PCR using two set of consensus primers (PGMY09/11 and degenerate GP-E6/E7). Fifty-five samples were positive to HPV DNA giving a prevalence of 18.6%. Risk factors such as lack of formal education (P-value: 0.003), divorcee (P-value: 0.019), polygamy (P-value: 0.027), unemployment (P-value: 0.023), low income earnings (P-value: 0.018), younger age (<18years) at sexual debut (P-value: 0.039) and passive smoking (P-value: 0.017) were significantly associated with HPV infection. High HPV prevalence and associated risk factors observed in this study shows the continuous transmission of the virus in Southwest Nigeria. Hence, enlarged monitoring including intense public awareness and cervical cancer screening is urgently needed for prevention and control strategies.