1
|
Røssell EL, Bekker HL, Schonberg MA, Sønbø Kristiansen I, Borgquist S, Støvring H. Danish Women Make Decisions about Participation in Breast Cancer Screening prior to Invitation Information: An Online Survey Using Experimental Methods. Med Decis Making 2024:272989X241248142. [PMID: 38703097 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x241248142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION At mammography screening invitation, the Danish Health Authority recommends women aged 50 to 69 y make an informed decision about whether to be screened. Previous studies have shown that women have very positive attitudes about screening participation. Therefore, we hypothesized that Danish women may already have decided to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving their screening invitation at age 50 y. METHODS We invited a random sample of 2,952 Danish women aged 44 to 49 y (prescreening age) to complete an online questionnaire about barriers to informed screening decision making using the official digital mailbox system in Denmark. We asked participants about their screening intentions using 3 different questions to which women were randomized: screening presented 1) as an opportunity, 2) as a choice, and 3) as an opportunity plus a question about women's stage of decision making. All women completed questions about background characteristics, intended participation in the screening program, use and impact of screening information, and preferences for the decision-making process. Data were linked to sociodemographic register data. RESULTS A total of 790 (26.8%) women participated in the study. Herein, 97% (95% confidence interval: 96%-98%) reported that they wanted to participate in breast cancer screening when invited at age 50 y. When presented with the choice compared with the opportunity framing, more women rejected screening. When asked about their stage of decision making, most (87%) had already made a decision about screening participation and were unlikely to change their mind. CONCLUSION In our study, almost all women of prescreening age wanted to participate in breast cancer screening, suggesting that providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making. HIGHLIGHTS Almost all women of prescreening age (44-49 y) in our study wanted to participate in the Danish national mammography screening program starting at age 50 y.Early decision making represents a barrier for informed decision making as women in this study had intentions to participate in breast cancer screening prior to receiving an official screening invitation, and therefore, providing information at the time of screening invitation may be too late to support informed decision making.Very few women rejected screening participation; however, more women rejected screening when the information was framed as an active choice between having or declining breast cancer screening (continue with usual care) compared with presenting only the option of screening with no description of the alternative.Two-thirds of women reading the screening information in this study had unchanged attitudes toward screening after reading the presented information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hilary Louise Bekker
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Research Centre of Patient Involvement Interventions (ResCenPI), DPH, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mara A Schonberg
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Research Unit of General Practice, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Signe Borgquist
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henrik Støvring
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fransen MP, Damman OC, Bas S, Uiters E, Timmermans DR. Decision-making in breast cancer screening: A qualitative exploration of the match between women's beliefs and screening information in the Netherlands. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 122:108155. [PMID: 38325207 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Decision-making about breast cancer screening requires balanced and understandable information that takes prior beliefs of screening invitees into account. METHODS In qualitative interviews with 22 Dutch women who were invited for screening for the first time (49-52 years of age, varying health literacy levels), we gained insight in their beliefs on breast cancer and breast cancer screening, and explored how the current screening information matched these beliefs. RESULTS Breast cancer was perceived as an unpredictable, severe, and uncontrollable disease. Women considered screening as self-evident and an important mean to gain some control over breast cancer. Information on benefits of screening was in line with women's prior beliefs and confirmed women's main reasons to participate. Information about false-positive outcomes, overtreatment, and false negative outcomes did not correspond to women's prior beliefs and this information was generally not considered relevant for decision-making. Preferences for additional information merely concerned practical information on the screening procedure. CONCLUSION Complex information on the harms of screening does not match women's beliefs and is not taken into account in their decision-making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Information regarding breast cancer screening could be further aligned to prior beliefs by taking into account values, filling knowledge gaps and correct misconceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam P Fransen
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Olga C Damman
- Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sharell Bas
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen Uiters
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle Rm Timmermans
- Amsterdam Public Health Research institute, Quality of Care, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Van der Boechorststraat 7 1081 Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Strien-Knippenberg IS, Arjangi-Babetti H, Timmermans DRM, Schrauwen L, Fransen MP, Melles M, Damman OC. Communicating the results of risk-based breast cancer screening through visualizations of risk: a participatory design approach. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2024; 24:78. [PMID: 38500098 PMCID: PMC10949766 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02483-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk-based breast cancer (BC) screening raises new questions regarding information provision and risk communication. This study aimed to: 1) investigate women's beliefs and knowledge (i.e., mental models) regarding BC risk and (risk-based) BC screening in view of implications for information development; 2) develop novel informational materials to communicate the screening result in risk-based BC screening, including risk visualizations of both quantitative and qualitative information, from a Human-Centered Design perspective. METHODS Phase 1: Interviews were conducted (n = 15, 40-50 years, 5 lower health literate) on women's beliefs about BC risk and (risk-based) BC screening. Phase 2: In three participatory design sessions, women (n = 4-6 across sessions, 40-50 years, 2-3 lower health literate) made assignments and created and evaluated visualizations of risk information central to the screening result. Prototypes were evaluated in two additional sessions (n = 2, 54-62 years, 0-1 lower health literate). Phase 3: Experts (n = 5) and women (n = 9, 40-74 years) evaluated the resulting materials. Two other experts were consulted throughout the development process to ensure that the content of the information materials was accurate. Interviews were transcribed literally and analysed using qualitative thematic analysis, focusing on implications for information development. Notes, assignments and materials from the participatory design sessions were summarized and main themes were identified. RESULTS Women in both interviews and design sessions were positive about risk-based BC screening, especially because personal risk factors would be taken into account. However, they emphasized that the rationale of risk-based screening and classification into a risk category should be clearly stated and visualized, especially for higher- and lower-risk categories (which may cause anxiety or feelings of unfairness due to a lower screening frequency). Women wanted to know their personal risk, preferably visualized in an icon array, and wanted advice on risk reduction and breast self-examination. However, most risk factors were considered modifiable by women, and the risk factor breast density was not known, implying that information should emphasize that BC risk depends on multiple factors, including breast density. CONCLUSIONS The information materials, including risk visualizations of both quantitative and qualitative information, developed from a Human-Centered Design perspective and a mental model approach, were positively evaluated by the target group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge S van Strien-Knippenberg
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hannah Arjangi-Babetti
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Danielle R M Timmermans
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Schrauwen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam P Fransen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marijke Melles
- Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Olga C Damman
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bongaerts THG, Büchner FL, Crone MR, van Exel J, Guicherit OR, Numans ME, Nierkens V. Perspectives on cancer screening participation in a highly urbanized region: a Q-methodology study in The Hague, the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1925. [PMID: 36243684 PMCID: PMC9571478 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14312-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Netherlands hosts, as many other European countries, three population-based cancer screening programmes (CSPs). The overall uptake among these CSPs is high, but has decreased over recent years. Especially in highly urbanized regions the uptake rates tend to fall below the minimal effective rate of 70% set by the World Health Organization. Understanding the reasons underlying the decision of citizens to partake in a CPS are essential in order to optimize the current screening participation rates. The aim of this study was to explore the various perspectives concerning cancer screening among inhabitants of The Hague, a highly urbanized region of the Netherlands. METHODS A Q-methodology study was conducted to provide insight in the prevailing perspectives on partaking in CSPs. All respondents were inhabitants of the city of The Hague, the Netherlands. In an online application they ranked a set of 31 statements, based on the current available literature and clustered by the Integrated Change model, into a 9-column forced ranking grid according to level of agreement, followed by a short survey. Respondents were asked to participate in a subsequent interview to explain their ranking. By-person factor analysis was used to identify distinct perspectives, which were interpreted using data from the rankings and interviews. RESULTS Three distinct perspectives were identified: 1). "Positive about participation", 2). "Thoughtful about participation", and 3). "Fear drives participation". These perspectives provide insight into how potential respondents, living in an urbanized region in the Netherlands, decide upon partaking in CSPs. CONCLUSIONS Since CSPs will only be effective when participation rates are sufficiently high, it is essential to have insight into the different perspectives among potential respondents concerning partaking in a CSP. This study adds new insights concerning these perspectives and suggests several ideas for future optimization of the CSPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas H G Bongaerts
- Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands. .,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Frederike L Büchner
- Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Matty R Crone
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Research, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Onno R Guicherit
- University Cancer Center Leiden - The Hague, at Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Mattijs E Numans
- Health Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Vera Nierkens
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cheng YW, Li YC. Examining the Factors That Affect the Diagnosis of Patients with Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test Results. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19137569. [PMID: 35805251 PMCID: PMC9265584 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19137569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Due to the threat of colorectal cancer (CRC) to health, Taiwan included the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) under preventive health services in 2010. We examined the factors that affect the diagnosis of people with positive FOBT results. Data were retrospectively collected from the CRC screening database. In the model predicting factors that affect the diagnosis of 89,046 people with positive FOBT results, the risks of disease in the CRC group were lower in medical institutions that conducted follow-up examinations in regions such as Northern Taiwan compared to that in Eastern Taiwan (p = 0.013); they were lower in the age group of 50 to 65 years than those in the age group of 71 to 75 years (p < 0.001, p = 0.016), and lower in the outpatient medical units that conducted follow-up examinations than those in the inpatient medical units by 0.565 times (p < 0.001, 95% CI: 0.493−0.647). Factors affecting the diagnosis of patients with positive FOBT results were gender, the region of the medical institution, medical unit for follow-up examinations, age, screening site, family history, type of follow-up examinations, and follow-up time. Therefore, the identification of characteristics of patients with positive FOBT results and the promotion of follow-up examination are important prevention strategies for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin-Wen Cheng
- Department of Business Management, College of Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 70, Lien-Hai Rd., Gushan Dist., Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan;
| | - Ying-Chun Li
- Institute of Health Care Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 70, Lien-Hai Rd., Gushan Dist., Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-7-5252000 (ext. 4875)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheng YW, Li YC. Factors affecting the follow-up time after a positive result in the fecal occult blood test. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258130. [PMID: 34610043 PMCID: PMC8491872 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2010, Taiwan included the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) under preventive health insurance services. For patients whose test positive, receiving follow-ups is paramount. This study investigated factors affecting the follow-up time of these patients. This retrospective study used data from the colorectal cancer screening archives. The study period was from 2010 to 2013, and the subjects were 50-75-year-old persons who tested positive for FOBT. The t test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple regression were performed to address the differences in the mean tracking period between variables such as the population's demographic characteristics. The mean follow-up time for the 98,482 participants whose screening results were positive exhibited significant differences (p < 0.001) according to medical unit region and classification, age, screening location, family history, examination method, and diagnosis. The model predicting the mean follow-up time predicted a period of 10.079 days longer for those whose hospital was on an offshore island than that of those whose hospital was in the eastern regions. The follow-up time was 1.257 days shorter for people who were inpatients than those who were outpatients and was 8.902 days longer for people who underwent double contrast barium enema plus flexible sigmoidoscopy than those who underwent other examination methods. Patients with a family history of colorectal cancer and those whose examination results indicated cancer had a follow-up time of 2.562 and 2.476 days shorter than those who did not know their family history and those with other results, respectively. Factors affecting the follow-up time of people whose FOBT results were positive consisted of the location and classification of the follow-up institution, age, screening location, family history, examination method, and diagnosis. This provides valuable references for improving the cancer screening program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin-Wen Cheng
- Department of Business Management, College of Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Ying-Chun Li
- Institute of Health Care Management, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bertels L, Knottnerus B, Bastiaans L, Danquah A, van H, Dekker E, van K. Decision-making in screening positive participants who follow up with colonoscopy in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: A mixed-method study. Psychooncology 2021; 31:245-252. [PMID: 34535928 PMCID: PMC9291115 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore worry and decision-making processes used by faecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive participants in the Dutch national screening programme for colorectal cancer. METHODS A mixed-methods study consisting of 22 semi-structured interviews in FIT-positive participants who underwent the recommended colonoscopy within 4-6 months after the FIT result, followed by a widespread questionnaire in a larger target population (N = 1495). RESULTS In the interviews, we recognised two different decision-making processes. The first is an affective heuristic decision process where the decision to participate is made instantly and is paired with high-risk perception, worry and (severe) emotional turmoil. The second is a more time-consuming analytical decision process in which participants describe discussing options with others. In the questionnaire, high levels of cancer worry (CWS > 9) were reported by 34% of respondents. Decisional difficulties were reported by 15% of respondents, and 34% of respondents reported discussing the positive FIT result with their GP. Individuals with high levels of cancer worry contacted their GP less often than those with low levels. CONCLUSIONS The Dutch two-step screening programme may result in high levels of cancer worry in a non-cancer population. More research is needed to monitor worry and its role in decision-making in cancer screening, as well as ways to facilitate decision-making for participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda Bertels
- Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Knottnerus
- Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lottie Bastiaans
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Augustina Danquah
- Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk van
- Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kristel van
- Department of General Practice, Cancer Center Amsterdam and Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sazali MF, Rahim SSSA, Hayati F, Mohd Daud MN, Avoi R, Omar A, Atil A, Abd Rahim MA, Madrim MF, Mokti K, Ramdzan AR, Sidek Ahmad ZN, Zakaria AD, Che Ani MF, Ibrahim AF, Azhar ZI, Jeffree MS, Hassan MR. Colorectal cancer and potential predictors of never screened for faecal occult blood test: a narrative review. J Public Health Res 2021; 11. [PMID: 34351098 PMCID: PMC8859728 DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health threat. Therefore, CRC screening uptake has been a focus with the established precancerous lesion and the strong association of early detection with staging and survival of the disease. However, CRC screening is relatively low in many countries. This article briefly discussed the current situation of CRC, recommendations, and current uptake of CRC screening in various countries. Besides that, this article also highlights the potential factors that help to predict the CRC screening uptake worldwide. Identification of those factors could guide policymakers to develop an effective strategy to improve the CRC screening uptake and ultimately improve the health outcome of the population. Significance for public health This study highlights the public health challenge in early screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). The prevalence of never screened for faecal occult blood test is relatively high. This review dissects the issue and further discuss on the predictors, which could guide policymakers in developing strategy to improve CRC screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Fazeli Sazali
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul Rahim
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Firdaus Hayati
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu.
| | - Mohd Nazri Mohd Daud
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Richard Avoi
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Azizan Omar
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Azman Atil
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Mohd Faizal Madrim
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Khalid Mokti
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Abdul Rahman Ramdzan
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Zulkhairul Naim Sidek Ahmad
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan.
| | - Mohd Firdaus Che Ani
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor.
| | - Aini Fahriza Ibrahim
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak.
| | - Zahir Izuan Azhar
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor.
| | - Mohammad Saffree Jeffree
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Mohd Rohaizat Hassan
- Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O'Keeffe M, Nickel B, Dakin T, Maher CG, Albarqouni L, McCaffery K, Barratt A, Moynihan R. Journalists' views on media coverage of medical tests and overdiagnosis: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e043991. [PMID: 34078634 PMCID: PMC8173287 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Promotional media coverage of early detection tests is an important driver of overdiagnosis. Following research evidence that global media coverage presents the benefits of testing healthy people far more frequently than harms, and gives little coverage to overdiagnosis, we sought to examine journalists' views on media reporting of tests, overdiagnosis, and strategies to improve critical reporting on tests. DESIGN Qualitative study using semistructured telephone interviews. Interviews were conducted between February and March 2020 and were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING Twenty-two journalists (mainly specialising in health reporting, average 14.5 years' experience) based in Australia. RESULTS This sample of journalists acknowledged the potential harms of medical tests but felt that knowledge of harms was low among journalists and the public at large. Most were aware of the term overdiagnosis, but commonly felt that it is challenging to both understand and communicate in light of strong beliefs in the benefits of early detection. Journalists felt that newsworthiness in the form of major public health impact was the key ingredient for stories about medical tests. The journalists acknowledged that factors, like the press release and 'click bait culture' in particular, can influence the framing of coverage about tests. Lack of knowledge and training, as well as time pressures, were perceived to be the main barriers to critical reporting on tests. Journalists felt that training and better access to information about potential harms would enable more critical reporting. CONCLUSIONS Effectively communicating overdiagnosis is a challenge in light of common beliefs about the benefits of testing and the culture of current journalism practices. Providing journalists with training, support and better access to information about potential harms of tests could aid critical reporting of tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary O'Keeffe
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Dakin
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Barratt
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ray Moynihan
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sazali MF, Syed Abdul Rahim SS, Avoi R, Hassan MR, Hayati F, Azhar ZI, Jeffree MS, Lukman KA, Tha NO, Sajali H, Atil A, Abd Rahim MA. Factors of Never Screened with Faecal Occult Blood Test in Public Primary Care Facilities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2021; 22:163-169. [PMID: 33507695 PMCID: PMC8184202 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.1.163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still a major public health threat. In the effort to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, faecal occult blood test (FOBT) is currently the screening tools used for early detection of CRC. However, the uptake of FOBT screening is less than promising. This study aims to identify the prevalence and predictors of Never Screened with FOBT (NS-FOBT). METHODS A cross sectional study was conducted in five health clinics under Kota Kinabalu district, Sabah, Malaysia Borneo involving 162 attendees with age of 50 years old and above. A validated self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of NS-FOBT. RESULTS The prevalence of NS-FOBT was 85.8% (n=139). Important predictors of NS-FOBT were age (aOR: 0.922; 95% CI: 0.855, 0.995; p=0.035), Bumiputera ethnicity (vs Non Bumiputera; aOR: 4.285; 95% CI: 1.384, 13.263; p=0.012), knowledge score (aOR: 0.921; 95% CI: 0.856, 0.99; p=0.027), and attitude score (aOR: 0.801; 95% CI: 0.702, 0.913; p=0.001). CONCLUSION There is high prevalence of NS-FOBT. Age, ethnicity, knowledge, and attitude were important predictors of NS-FOBT. Strategies are needed to improve FOBT screening rate among the public. Socio-culturally tailored health promotion strategies as well as strengthening the communication, collaboration, and education to enhance the role of family physician is vital in improving the CRC prevention and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Fazeli Sazali
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul Rahim
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Richard Avoi
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Mohd Rohaizat Hassan
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
| | - Firdaus Hayati
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
| | - Zahir Izuan Azhar
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
| | - Mohammad Saffree Jeffree
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Khamisah Awang Lukman
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Naing Oo Tha
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Helmy Sajali
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Azman Atil
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Woudstra AJ, Smets EMA, Dekker E, Broens THF, Penning J, Smith S, McCaffery K, Fransen MP. Development and pilot-testing of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for individuals with varying health literacy levels. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1847-1858. [PMID: 31064682 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Making an informed decision about colorectal cancer screening requires health literacy. Our aim was to develop and pilot-test a computer-based decision aid to support informed decision making about whether or not to participate in colorectal cancer screening for individuals with varying health literacy levels in the Netherlands. METHODS First, we designed and adapted the decision aid prototype among 25 individuals with low (n = 15) and adequate (n = 10) health literacy. Second, we used a before/after study to assess changes in knowledge, attitude, intention, decisional conflict, deliberation, anxiety and risk perception in an online survey among 81 individuals eligible for colorectal cancer screening with low (n = 35) and adequate (n = 46) health literacy. RESULTS The decision aid was acceptable, comprehensible, reduced decisional conflict, increased deliberation and improved knowledge about colorectal cancer screening, but not about colorectal cancer, among individuals with adequate and low health literacy. Usability was slightly higher for participants with adequate health literacy compared to those with low health literacy. CONCLUSION The decision aid is promising in supporting informed decision making about colorectal cancer screening, also among individuals with lower health literacy. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Further refinement of interactive features, such as videos, animations and the values clarification exercise, is needed to increase the usability of the decision aid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke J Woudstra
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Tom H F Broens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Informatics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Judith Penning
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sian Smith
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Lowy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten McCaffery
- Wiser Healthcare, Sydney School of Public health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Mirjam P Fransen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Public Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|