Level of and associated factors for non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment among tuberculosis patients in Gamo Gofa zone, southern Ethiopia: cross-sectional study

Medication nonadherence and associated factors in patients with tuberculosis in Wau, South Sudan: a cross- sectional study using the world health organization multidimensional adherence model

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis medication nonadherence is a multi-dimensional public health problem with serious consequences worldwide. There is little information available for medication nonadherence in South Sudan. This study assessed the proportion, reasons, and associated factors for nonadherence among patients with TB in Wau Municipality, South Sudan.

METHODS

A health facility based cross-sectional study was conducted among 234 tuberculosis (TB) patients receiving first line anti-TB regimen in Wau Municipality. Urine isoniazid metabolite testing (IsoScreen®) was used to determine nonadherence (visualized by negative test results) and a questionnaire was used to describe the reasons for nonadherence. Modified poisson regression with robust standard errors was performed since the proportion of nonadherence was < 10%, to identify nonadherence associated factors using the WHO Multidimensional adherence model.

RESULTS

Out of 234 participants, 24.8% (95% CI, 19.2 - 30.3) were nonadherent to the TB treatment regimen. At multivariate analysis, nonadherence was significantly associated with: relief of symptoms (APR 1.93, 95% CI 1.12 - 3.34, p = 0.018), alcohol use (APR 2.12, 95% CI 1.33 - 3.96, p = 0.019) and waiting time to receive drugs (APR 1.77, 95% CI 1.11 - 2.83, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Tuberculosis medication nonadherence was high, and it's associated with patients' relived of symptoms, alcohol use, and prolonged waiting time at health facility. Hence, addressing these barriers and the use of multifaceted interventions e.g. counseling, health education and improve appointments are crucial to reduce nonadherence among patients with TB in South Sudan.

Non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment and associated factors among TB patients in public health facilities of Hossana town, Southern Ethiopia, 2022

Background

Non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment is one of the crucial challenges to improving TB treatment outcomes and reducing healthcare costs. The prevalence of non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment is not well documented in the study context. Therefore, this study was aimed at estimating the prevalence of non-adherence to anti-tuberculosis treatment and associated factors among TB patients attending TB clinics in Hosanna town, Southern Ethiopia, in 2022.

Methods

An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted from April to May 2022. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to select a sample of 233 study subjects from all four public health facilities. According to the order of arrival, every second person was interviewed. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that was created using several works of literature. A multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-adherence to anti-TB drugs. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated.

Results

The study included 233 tuberculosis (TB) patients with a response rate of 100%. The prevalence of non-adherence was 18% (95% CI: 15.39, 21.82). Being in the continuation phase (AOR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.16, 8.23), not attending formal education (AOR = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.12, 5.42), not disclosing TB status to their family (AOR = 2.36, 95% CI: 0.11, 5.04) and having poor TB knowledge (AOR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.48, 6.48) were significantly associated with non-adherence to TB treatment.

Conclusion

Among TB patients, there was a significant prevalence of non-adherence to anti-TB medications. Interventions that target patients with low education status, are in the continuation phase, and do not disclose their TB status to their families are required to improve TB treatment adherence. In addition, improving health education is important to enhance TB knowledge, which has an impact on TB treatment adherence. The need for good drug adherence should be emphasized while counseling TB patients.

Is Tobacco Use Associated With Risk of Recurrence and Mortality Among People With TB?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Associations between tobacco use and poor TB treatment outcomes are well documented. However, for important outcomes such as TB recurrence or relapse and mortality during treatment, as well as for associations with smokeless tobacco (ST), the evidence is not summarized systematically.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is tobacco use associated with risk of poor treatment outcomes among people with TB?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were searched on November 22, 2021. Epidemiologic studies reporting associations between tobacco use and at least one TB treatment outcome were eligible. Independent double-screening, extractions, and quality assessments were undertaken. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for the two primary review outcomes (TB recurrence or relapse and mortality during treatment), and heterogeneity was explored using subgroups. Other outcomes were synthesized narratively.

RESULTS

Our searches identified 1,249 records, of which 28 were included in the meta-analyses. Based on 15 studies, higher risk of TB recurrence or relapse was found with ever using tobacco vs never using tobacco (risk ratio [RR], 1.78; 95% CI, 1.31-2.43; I2 = 85%), current tobacco use vs no tobacco use (RR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.59-2.40; I2 = 72%), and former tobacco use vs never using tobacco (RR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21-2.80; I2 = 4%); heterogeneity arose from differences in study quality, design, and participant characteristics. Thirty-eight studies were identified for mortality, of which 13 reported mortality during treatment. Ever tobacco use (RR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.81; I2 = 0%) and current tobacco use (RR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09-2.10; I2 = 87%) significantly increased the likelihood of mortality during treatment among people with TB compared with never using tobacco and not currently using tobacco, respectively; heterogeneity was explained largely by differences in study design. Almost all studies in the meta-analyses scored high or moderate on quality assessments. Narrative synthesis showed that tobacco use was a risk factor for other unfavorable TB treatment outcomes, as previously documented. Evidence on ST was limited, but identified studies suggested an increased risk for poor outcomes with its use compared with not using it.

INTERPRETATION

Tobacco use significantly increases the risk of TB recurrence or relapse and mortality during treatment among people with TB, highlighting the need to address tobacco use to improve TB outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRY

PROSPERO; No.: CRD42017060821; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Assessment of TB treatment adherence using computer-assisted self-interviewing

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the correlation and agreement between computer-assisted self-interviewing (CASI) and home-based unannounced pill counts (HUPC) for assessing anti-TB medication adherence (MA) and to examine the relationship between MA and treatment success.METHODS: Individual CASI-evaluated MA was compared three times with HUPC MA over the treatment course. The relationship between the two methodologies was determined using correlation coefficients (r) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The association between MA and efficacy was evaluated using odds ratios (ORs).RESULTS: According to CASI assessments, MA rates of 52 TB patients were 92.2%, 90.6%, and 87.5% at Week 4, 8 and 16-24, respectively, with a strong correlation (r > 0.76) and agreement (ICC > 0.88) with HUPC evaluations. CASI missed one-third of the non-adherent cases reported by HUPC based on patient adherence status. The treatment success rates of patients with >90% adherence, as measured by CASI and HUPC, did not differ significantly; however, >85% adherence was associated with higher treatment success (OR 45.1) than 90% adherence (OR 21.9).CONCLUSION: CASI results were comparable to those of HUPC. As it increased the likelihood of successful treatment, a threshold of >85% may be more appropriate than >90% for defining medication-adherent patients.

FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO PULMONARY TB TREATMENT LOST TO FOLLOW-UP IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: AN OVERVIEW

Background

Despite the available treatment options, pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of disease-related deaths worldwide. Treatment non-adherence/lost to follow-up (LTFU), particularly in developing countries, is a continuous concern. LTFU prolongs TB infectiousness and contributes to TB treatment failure, relapse, and death. Furthermore, LTFU also delays global TB eradication by promoting TB spread and drug-resistant TB strain development.[1] The purpose of this paper is to give an overview of the commonly observed risk factors associated with TB treatment LTFU in developing countries.

Materials and Methods

A literature survey was done of studies published in the past decade, which evaluated the risk factors for LTFU in TB patients, specifically in developing countries. Furthermore, some prospective TB treatment adherence initiatives and the feasibility of these initiatives within developing countries were assessed.[3].

Results

Several variables, including socio-demographic, patient-related, TB disease and other health-related-factors, healthcare and system determinants, as well as treatment-related factors, were identified to increase the risk of TB treatment LTFU. More recently applied adherence interventions in developing countries, show potential for implementation on a larger scale.

Conclusion

Successful TB treatment is contingent on treatment adherence, and by addressing these persisting LTFU risk factors, treatment adherence in developing countries may be improved.

Determinant factors for loss to follow-up in drug-resistant tuberculosis patients: the importance of psycho-social and economic aspects

Background

Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) is the barrier for global TB elimination efforts with a lower treatment success rate. Loss to follow-up (LTFU) in DR-TB is a serious problem, causes mortality and morbidity for patients, and leads to wide spreading of DR-TB to their family and the wider community, as well as wasting health resources. Prevention and management of LTFU is crucial to reduce mortality, prevent further spread of DR-TB, and inhibit the development and transmission of more extensively drug-resistant strains of bacteria. A study about the factors associated with loss to follow-up is needed to develop appropriate strategies to prevent DR-TB patients become loss to follow-up. This study was conducted to identify the factors correlated with loss to follow-up in DR-TB patients, using questionnaires from the point of view of patients.

Methods

An observational study with a cross-sectional design was conducted. Study subjects were all DR-TB patients who have declared as treatment success and loss to follow-up from DR-TB treatment. A structured questionnaire was used to collect information by interviewing the subjects as respondents. Obtained data were analyzed potential factors correlated with loss to follow-up in DR-TB patients.

Results

A total of 280 subjects were included in this study. Sex, working status, income, and body mass index showed a significant difference between treatment success and loss to follow-up DR-TB patients with p-value of 0.013, 0.010, 0.007, and 0.006, respectively. In regression analysis, factors correlated with increased LTFU were negative attitude towards treatment (OR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.1–1.3), limitation of social support (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.0–1.2), dissatisfaction with health service (OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.5–3.0)), and limitation of economic status (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.0–1.2)).

Conclusions

Male patients, jobless, non-regular employee, lower income, and underweight BMI were found in higher proportion in LTFU patients. Negative attitude towards treatment, limitation of social support, dissatisfaction with health service, and limitation of economic status are factors correlated with increased LTFU in DR-TB patients. Non-compliance to treatment is complex, we suggest that the involvement and support from the combination of health ministry, labor and employment ministry, and social ministry may help to resolve the complex problems of LTFU in DR-TB patients.