Evaluation of inhaler technique and achievement and maintenance of mastery of budesonide/formoterol Spiromax® compared with budesonide/formoterol Turbuhaler® in adult patients with asthma: the Easy Low Instruction Over Time (ELIOT) study

Recognizing and Tackling Inhaler Technique Decay in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disesase (COPD) Clinical Practice

A poor inhaler technique continues to represent a substantial barrier to effective asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease management. It can result in perceived lack of treatment effectiveness even with apparent adherence to a prescribed regimen of inhaled maintenance therapies, potentially resulting in an unnecessary change or escalation of treatment. Many patients are not trained to inhaler mastery in real-world practice; furthermore, even where mastery is initially achieved, an ongoing assessment and education are seldom maintained. In this review, we present an overview of the evidence for deterioration of the inhaler technique over time after training, investigate the factors that contribute to this deterioration, and explore innovative approaches to addressing the problem. We also propose steps forward drawn from the literature and our clinical insights.

Narrative Review of the Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Inhaler Handling Errors in the Control of Asthma and COPD

Purpose of Review

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic respiratory diseases that remain uncontrolled in many patients, despite the wide range of therapeutic options available. This review analyzes the available clinical evidence on 3 budesonide/formoterol DPI devices, Spiromax^®, Turbuhaler^®, and Easyhaler^®, in terms of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), inhaler errors, and asthma and COPD control.

Recent Findings

The effectiveness of dry powder inhalers (DPI) depends largely on the device and the patient’s inhaler technique. Equally important are the patient’s perception of the inhaler and adherence. Given the high burden of these diseases, it is important that efforts be made to select the best DPI for each patient and to analyze the impact of these variables to help improve the health and quality of life of our patients.

Summary

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the present knowledge about PROs, inhaler handling errors, and asthma and COPD control achieved by Spiromax^®, Turbuhaler^®, and Easyhaler^®.

Inhaler technique in asthma and COPD: challenges and unmet knowledge that can contribute to suboptimal use in real life

Introduction: Inhalers are the most commonly used devices for lung drug delivery in asthma and COPD. Inhaler use offers several advantages but requires the user's proper mastery. The issue of inhaler technique is very important as inhaler misuse remains common in real life regardless of the inhaler used and is associated with poor disease control.Areas covered:This narrative review analyses the key-steps of inhaler mastery and the significance of the errors of use for the main devices. There are uncertainties on many tasks of inhaler use and on those variations from recommended steps that are considered as critical errors.Expert opinion: Despite technological advancements, an easy-to-use device is not yet available. Whatever the chosen inhaler, health care givers' proper practical education with the opportunity of feedback learning has a key-role for improving inhaler technique, but is time-consuming, and remains limited to few successful experiences. Newer digital technologies will be applied to the field of inhaler education, but the lack of knowledge on many practical aspects of inhaler technique might be a limit for its extensive implementation. Possibly digital innovation might substantially contribute to reduce inhaler misuse only if clinicians, manufacturers, and subjects will cooperate together on this issue.

Real-life association between inhaler technique, patient preference and asthma control in patients with uncontrolled asthma switched to budesonide/formoterol DuoResp® Spiromax® combination

Objective: In asthma, treatment effectiveness is strongly influenced by the quality of inhaler use. New devices such as Spiromax® have been specifically developed to improve ease of use. It is crucial to determine whether switching to such a device improves inhaler technique and clinical outcomes, and to identify factors associated with handling errors.Methods: This observational study assessed inhaler device handling errors in 1435 asthma patients recruited via 135 participating physicians in France, before and after switching therapy from the Symbicort Turbuhaler® or Seretide® Diskus® to DuoResp® Spiromax®. Patients received training in the use of their new device at baseline and were re-assessed after three months.Results: After three months of use, 67% of patients were using the DuoResp® Spiromax® with no handling errors, and 88% with no critical errors. The presence of comorbidities was associated with handling errors overall. Concurrent illness potentially affecting device handling and previous training were associated with critical device handling errors. Most patients (85.4%) preferred DuoResp® Spiromax® over their previous device. Levels of inadequately controlled or uncontrolled asthma were reduced from baseline among patients using DuoResp® Spiromax® (8.6% versus 64.6%), and were higher in patients with critical handling errors.Conclusions: Effective patient education, correct inhaler technique, treatment adherence and devices associated with high patient satisfaction are interrelated factors key to the successful delivery of inhaled asthma therapy. Inhaler technique and patient device satisfaction should be routinely assessed in treated patients with uncontrolled asthma. Supplemental data for this article can be accessed at publisher's website.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide and asthma treatment adherence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite increased clinician awareness, nonadherence to inhaled corticosteroid treatment presents a major challenge to successful asthma management and risks inappropriate treatment escalation, particularly in severe disease. In patients with Type-2 mediated biology, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has a role in assessment and monitoring of adherence to inhaled corticosteroids.

RECENT FINDINGS

Asthmatic patients with elevated FeNO are at an increased risk of exacerbation. High FeNO is often secondary to suboptimal adherence to inhaled corticosteroid treatment, whether intentional or nonintentional. FENO-suppression can 'unmask' underlying adherence issues and is a useful test in the presence of Type-2 biology in the 'difficult-to-control' asthma population. Identification of nonadherence can improve asthma control and prevent inappropriate commencement of costly biologic therapies.

SUMMARY

Assessment of adherence and FeNO response to monitored inhaled corticosteroid in Type-2 biomarker high asthmatic individuals may prevent unnecessary escalation to biologic therapy. Establishing an 'optimised' FeNO may alert clinicians to the possibility of underlying nonadherence at future clinical assessments.

DuoResp® Spiromax® adherence, satisfaction and ease of use: findings from a multi-country observational study in patients with asthma and COPD in Europe (SPRINT)

Objective: Adherence and inhaler technique are often suboptimal in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). New inhalers have been developed to improve these determinants of treatment effectiveness. We assessed treatment adherence, satisfaction, and ease of use of DuoResp^® Spiromax^® among SPRINT study participants.Methods: The Phase IV SPRINT study was conducted in 10 European countries. Asthma and COPD patients were receiving a fixed-dose combination of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA), delivered via various inhalers including DuoResp Spiromax. DuoResp Spiromax users self-assessed adherence using the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8^®), and ease of use and satisfaction using 10-point scales, during a single physician's office visit.Results: Of 1661 (asthma: n = 1101; COPD: n = 560) SPRINT study participants, 342 (asthma: n = 235; COPD: n = 107) received DuoResp Spiromax prior to inclusion. Overall, 72.5% of DuoResp Spiromax users reported medium or high adherence (MMAS-8 score ≥6). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) satisfaction score for DuoResp Spiromax was 8.9 (1.6). Almost all (98.8%) DuoResp Spiromax users were at least satisfied with their inhaler; 85.4% were very satisfied. Mean (SD) ease of use score for DuoResp Spiromax was 9.1 (1.3).Conclusions: Asthma and COPD patients using DuoResp Spiromax reported moderate-to-high medication adherence, were very satisfied with their inhaler and found it easy to use.

What to consider before prescribing inhaled medications: a pragmatic approach for evaluating the current inhaler landscape

Inhaled therapies are the cornerstone of treatment in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and there are a multitude of devices available. There is, however, a distinct lack of evidence-based guidance for healthcare providers on how to choose an appropriate inhaler. This review aims to summarise recent updates on topics related to inhaler choice, and to offer practical considerations for healthcare providers regarding currently marketed devices. The importance of choosing the right inhaler for the right patient is discussed, and the relative merits of dry powder inhalers, pressurised metered dose inhalers, breath-actuated pressurised metered dose inhalers, spacers and soft mist inhalers are considered. Compiling the latest studies in the devices therapy area, this review focuses on the most common types of handling errors, as well as the comparative rates of incorrect inhalation technique between devices. The impact of device-specific handling errors on inhaler performance is also discussed, and the characteristics that can impair optimal drug delivery, such as inhalation flow rate, inhalation volume and particle size, are compared between devices. The impact of patient perceptions, behaviours and problems with inhalation technique is analysed, and the need for appropriate patient education is also highlighted. The continued development of technology in inhaler design and the need to standardise study assessment, endpoints and patient populations are identified as future research needs. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.