Bronchial thermoplasty reduces gas trapping in severe asthma

Bronchial Thermoplasty Improves Ventilation Heterogeneity Measured by Functional Respiratory Imaging in Severe Asthma

Purpose

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic intervention for the treatment of severe asthma. Despite demonstrated symptomatic benefit, the underlying mechanisms by which this is achieved remain uncertain. We hypothesize that the effects of BT are driven by improvements in ventilation heterogeneity as assessed using functional respiratory imaging (FRI).

Patient and Methods

Eighteen consecutive patients with severe asthma who underwent clinically indicated BT were recruited. Patients were assessed at baseline, 4-week after treatment of the left lung, and 12-month after treatment of the right lung. Data collected included short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) and oral prednisolone (OCS) use, asthma control questionnaire (ACQ-5) and exacerbation history. Patients also underwent lung function tests and chest computed tomography. Ventilation parameters including interquartile distance (IQD; measure of ventilation heterogeneity) were derived using FRI.

Results

12 months after BT, significant improvements were seen in SABA and OCS use, ACQ-5, and number of OCS-requiring exacerbations. Apart from pre-bronchodilator FEV1, no other significant changes were observed in lung function. Ventilation heterogeneity significantly improved after treatment of the left lung (0.18 ± 0.04 vs 0.20 ± 0.04, p=0.045), with treatment effect persisting up to 12 months later (0.18 ± 0.05 vs 0.20 ± 0.04, p=0.028). Ventilation heterogeneity also improved after treatment of the right lung, although this did not reach statistical significance (0.18 ± 0.05 vs 0.19 ± 0.04, p=0.06).

Conclusion

Clinical benefits after BT are accompanied by improvements in ventilation heterogeneity, advancing our understanding of its mechanism of action. Beyond BT, FRI has the potential to be expanded into other clinical applications.

Bronchial thermoplasty attenuates bronchodilator responsiveness

INTRODUCTION

Bronchial thermoplasty is an effective intervention to improve respiratory symptoms and to reduce the rate of exacerbations in uncontrolled severe asthma. A reduction in airway smooth muscle is arguably the most widely discussed mechanisms accounting for these clinical benefits. Yet, this smooth muscle reduction should also translate into an impaired response to bronchodilator drugs. This study was designed to address this question.

METHODS

Eight patients with clinical indication for thermoplasty were studied. They were uncontrolled severe asthmatics despite optimal environmental control, treatment of comorbidities, and the use of high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists. Lung function measured by spirometry and respiratory mechanics measured by oscillometry were examined pre- and post-bronchodilator (salbutamol, 400 μg), both before and at least 1 year after thermoplasty.

RESULTS

Consistent with previous studies, thermoplasty yielded no benefits in terms of baseline lung function and respiratory mechanics, despite improving symptoms based on two asthma questionnaires (ACQ-5 and ACT-5). The response to salbutamol was also not affected by thermoplasty based on spirometric readouts, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC ratio. However, a significant interaction was observed between thermoplasty and salbutamol for two oscillometric readouts, namely reactance at 5 Hz (Xrs5) and reactance area (Ax), showing an attenuated response to salbutamol after thermoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermoplasty attenuates the response to a bronchodilator. We argue that this result is a physiological proof of therapeutic efficacy, consistent with the well-described effect of thermoplasty in reducing the amount of airway smooth muscle.

An underlying mechanism behind interventional pulmonology techniques for refractory asthma treatment: Neuro-immunity crosstalk

Asthma is a common disease that seriously threatens public health. With significant developments in bronchoscopy, different interventional pulmonology techniques for refractory asthma treatment have been developed. These technologies achieve therapeutic purposes by targeting diverse aspects of asthma pathophysiology. However, even though these newer techniques have shown appreciable clinical effects, their differences in mechanisms and mutual commonalities still deserve to be carefully explored. Therefore, in this review, we summarized the potential mechanisms of bronchial thermoplasty, targeted lung denervation, and cryoablation, and analyzed the relationship between these different methods. Based on available evidence, we speculated that the main pathway of chronic airway inflammation and other pathophysiologic processes in asthma is sensory nerve-related neurotransmitter release that forms a "neuro-immunity crosstalk" and amplifies airway neurogenic inflammation. The mechanism of completely blocking neuro-immunity crosstalk through dual-ablation of both efferent and afferent fibers may have a leading role in the clinical efficacy of interventional pulmonology in the treatment of asthma and deserves further investigation.

Which Endoscopic Procedure to Use and in What Patient? Valves, Coils, Foam, and Heat in COPD and Asthma

Despite the latest developments in therapeutic agents targeting airway endotypes, a significant proportion of patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain symptomatic. Endoscopic therapies have a complementary role in the management of these airway diseases. The sustained efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty (BT) among patients with asthma over 10 years has been encouraging, as it has been shown to improve symptom control and reduce hospital admissions and exacerbations. Studies suggest that BT helps ameliorate airway inflammation and reduce airway smooth muscle thickness. While studies suggest that it is as effective as biologic agents, its role in the management of severe asthma has yet to be clearly defined and GINA 2022 still suggests limiting its use to patients with characteristics of the various populations studied. Conversely, bronchoscopic lung volume reduction has shown promise among patients with advanced COPD. Rigorous patient selection is important. Patients with minimal collateral ventilation (CV) and higher heterogeneity index have shown to benefit the most from endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy. For those with ongoing CV, endobronchial coils would be more appropriate. Both therapeutic modalities have demonstrated improved quality of life, effort tolerance, and lung function indices among appropriately selected patients. The emerging evidence suggests that endoscopic procedures among airway disease still have a substantial role to play despite the development of new therapeutic options.

Bronchial thermoplasty: State of the art

Since the publication of a sham-controlled, randomized trial (AIR2) and subsequent marketing approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, we have significantly advanced our understanding of bronchial thermoplasty (BT)'s scientific basis, long-term safety, clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness. In particular, the last 2 years have witnessed multiple research publications on several of these counts. In this review, we critically appraise our evolving understanding of BT's biologic underpinnings and clinical impact, offer an evidence-based patient workflow guide for the busy pulmonologist and highlight both current challenges as well as potential solutions for the researcher and the clinician.

Plethysmography Derived Gas Trapping Lacks Utility in Predicting Response to Bronchial Thermoplasty

There is a paucity of literature on measurable baseline parameters predicting response and guiding selection for bronchial thermoplasty. This study examines whether baseline gas trapping, as assessed by plethysmography, is associated with a response to bronchial thermoplasty at 12 months.

43 consecutive patients with severe asthma (mean±sd age 57.6±13.3 years) were evaluated at baseline and 12 months post bronchial thermoplasty. Data collected at both time points included spirometry, body plethysmography and four clinical outcome measures, namely Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score, annual exacerbation frequency, maintenance oral corticosteroid requirement and short-acting β-agonist use.

At baseline, participants had severe airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s 49.1±15.8%) with marked gas trapping (residual volume (RV) 150.3±40.8%, RV/total lung capacity (TLC) 51.3±10.5%), poor symptom control (ACQ 3.3±1.0) and frequent exacerbations (median 4, interquartile range 8). 12 months after bronchial thermoplasty, significant improvements were observed in all four clinical outcome measures. However, baseline RV and RV/TLC were not significantly associated with changes in ACQ nor any other clinical outcome measure, and changes in RV and RV/TLC did not significantly correlate with a change in any clinical outcome measure.

Plethysmography-derived gas trapping does not demonstrate utility in predicting response and guiding selection for bronchial thermoplasty. An improvement in gas trapping was not associated with positive clinical outcomes, suggesting that this may not be the dominant mode of action of bronchial thermoplasty in generating clinical improvement.

This study examined whether measuring gas trapping by plethysmography could be used to predict response to bronchial thermoplasty; no association was foundhttps://bit.ly/3tJN1X8

Bronchial thermoplasty in asthma: an exploratory histopathological evaluation in distinct asthma endotypes/phenotypes

Background

Bronchial thermoplasty regulates structural abnormalities involved in airway narrowing in asthma. In the present study we aimed to investigate the effect of bronchial thermoplasty on histopathological bronchial structures in distinct asthma endotypes/phenotypes.

Methods

Endobronchial biopsies (n = 450) were collected from 30 patients with severe uncontrolled asthma before bronchial thermoplasty and after 3 sequential bronchial thermoplasties. Patients were classified based on blood eosinophils, atopy, allergy and smoke exposure. Tissue sections were assessed for histopathological parameters and expression of heat-shock proteins and glucocorticoid receptor. Proliferating cells were determined by Ki67-staining.

Results

In all patients, bronchial thermoplasty improved asthma control (p < 0.001), reduced airway smooth muscle (p = 0.014) and increased proliferative (Ki67 +) epithelial cells (p = 0.014). After bronchial thermoplasty, airway smooth muscle decreased predominantly in patients with T2 high asthma endotype. Epithelial cell proliferation was increased after bronchial thermoplasty in patients with low blood eosinophils (p = 0.016), patients with no allergy (p = 0.028) and patients without smoke exposure (p = 0.034).

In all patients, bronchial thermoplasty increased the expression of glucocorticoid receptor in epithelial cells (p = 0.018) and subepithelial mesenchymal cells (p = 0.033) and the translocation of glucocorticoid receptor in the nucleus (p = 0.036). Furthermore, bronchial thermoplasty increased the expression of heat shock protein-70 (p = 0.002) and heat shock protein-90 (p = 0.001) in epithelial cells and decreased the expression of heat shock protein-70 (p = 0.009) and heat shock protein-90 (p = 0.002) in subepithelial mesenchymal cells. The effect of bronchial thermoplasty on the expression of heat shock proteins -70 and -90 was distinctive across different asthma endotypes/phenotypes.

Conclusions

Bronchial thermoplasty leads to a diminishment of airway smooth muscle, to epithelial cell regeneration, increased expression and activation of glucocorticoid receptor in the airways and increased expression of heat shock proteins in the epithelium. Histopathological effects appear to be distinct in different endotypes/phenotypes indicating that the beneficial effects of bronchial thermoplasty are achieved by diverse molecular targets associated with asthma endotypes/phenotypes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01774-0.

Effect of Bronchial Thermoplasty on Air Trapping Assessed by Xenon Ventilation Computed Tomography

Objective Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure for patients with severe asthma. Although it has been suggested that BT works by reducing airway smooth muscle, the detailed mechanism underlying its effects is still unknown. Methods We performed xenon ventilation computed tomography (Xe-CT) before each BT procedure and six weeks after the third treatment to assess the improvement in lung ventilation at each separate lung region. The air trapping index in each lobe was defined as the mean trapping value (0: none, 1: mild, 2: moderate, and 3: severe) of the included segments. Patients and Materials Four patients were included. Results Asthma symptoms were improved after BT. The comparison of the scores at baseline with those after the third treatment showed that the air trapping index was improved in both the treated and untreated regions. However, neither the pulmonary function nor the exhaled nitric oxide was improved. Conclusion Using Xe-CT, we successfully evaluated the air trapping in patients who underwent BT. The improvement in asthma symptoms by BT may be related to the amelioration of peripheral lung ventilation in both the treated and untreated regions.

The effect of bronchial thermoplasty on airway volume measured 12 months post-procedure

Bronchial thermoplasty induces atrophy of the airway smooth muscle layer, but the mechanism whereby this improves patient health is unclear. In this study, we use computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the effects of bronchial thermoplasty on airway volume 12 months post-procedure. 10 consecutive patients with severe asthma were evaluated at baseline by the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and high-resolution CT at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC). The CT protocol was repeated 4 weeks after the left lung had been treated by bronchial thermoplasty, but prior to right lung treatment, and then again 12 months after both lungs were treated. The CT data were also used to model the implications of including the right middle lobe (RML) in the treatment field. The mean patient age was 62.7±7.7 years and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) 42.9±11.5% predicted. 12 months post-bronchial-thermoplasty, the ACQ improved, from 3.4±1.0 to 1.5±0.9 (p=0.001), as did the frequency of oral steroid-requiring exacerbations (p=0.008). The total airway volume increased 12 months after bronchial thermoplasty in both the TLC (p=0.03) and the FRC scans (p=0.02). No change in airway volume was observed in the untreated central airways. In the bronchial thermoplasty-treated distal airways, increases in airway volume of 38.4±31.8% at TLC (p=0.03) and 30.0±24.8% at FRC (p=0.01) were observed. The change in distal airway volume was correlated with the improvement in ACQ (r=-0.71, p=0.02). Modelling outputs demonstrated that treating the RML conferred no additional benefit. Bronchial thermoplasty induces long-term increases in airway volume, which correlate with symptomatic improvement.

Bronchial thermoplasty: Redefining its role

In this review, we trace (i) the origins of bronchial thermoplasty, (ii) the development of a solid evidence base for efficacy and safety, (iii) the emerging understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of action and (iv) the place in therapy today. Future challenges are then discussed.

Bronchial thermoplasty reduces airway resistance

BACKGROUND

The mechanism for symptomatic improvement after bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is unclear, since spirometry reveals little or no change. In this study, the effects of BT on airway resistance were examined using two independent techniques.

METHODS

Eighteen consecutive patients, with severe asthma (57.6 ± 14.2 years) were evaluated by spirometry and plethysmography at three time points: (i) baseline, (ii) left lung treated but right lung untreated and (iii) 6 weeks after both lungs were treated with BT. At each assessment, total and specific airway resistance (Raw, sRaw) were measured. High resolution CT scans were undertaken at the first two assessments, and measurements of lobar volume, airway volume and airway resistance were made. The Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) was administered at each assessment.

RESULTS

The baseline ACQ score was 3.5 ± 0.9, and improved progressively to 1.8 ± 1.2 (p < 0.01). At baseline, severe airflow obstruction was observed, FEV1 44.8 ± 13.7% predicted, together with gas trapping, and elevated Raw at 342 ± 173%predicted. Following BT, significant improvements in Raw and sRaw were observed, as well as a reduction in Residual Volume, increase in Vital Capacity and no change in FEV1. The change in Raw correlated with the change in ACQ (r = 0.56, p < 0.05). CT scans demonstrated reduced airway volume at baseline, which correlated with the increased Raw determined by plethysmography (p = - 0.536, p = < 0.05). Following BT, the airway volume increased in the treated lung, and this was accompanied by a significant reduction in CT-determined local airway resistance.

CONCLUSION

Symptomatic improvement after BT is mediated by increased airway volume and reduced airway resistance.

Resistance of the respiratory system measured with forced oscillation technique (FOT) correlates with bronchial thermoplasty response

BACKGROUND

Bronchial Thermoplasty (BT) is an endoscopic treatment for severe asthma using radiofrequency energy to target airway remodeling including smooth muscle. The correlation of pulmonary function tests and BT response are largely unknown. Forced Oscillation Technique (FOT) is an effort-independent technique to assess respiratory resistance (Rrs) by using pressure oscillations including small airways.

AIM

To investigate the effect of BT on pulmonary function, assessed by spirometry, bodyplethysmography and FOT and explore associations between pulmonary function parameters and BT treatment response.

METHODS

Severe asthma patients recruited to the TASMA trial were analyzed in this observational cohort study. Spirometry, bodyplethysmography and FOT measurements were performed before and 6 months after BT. Asthma questionnaires (AQLQ/ACQ-6) were used to assess treatment response.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were analyzed. AQLQ and ACQ improved significantly 6 months after BT (AQLQ 4.15 (±0.96) to 4.90 (±1.14) and ACQ 2.64 (±0.60) to 2.11 (±1.04), p = 0.004 and p = 0.02 respectively). Pulmonary function parameters remained stable. Improvement in FEV₁ correlated with AQLQ change (r = 0.45 p = 0.03). Lower respiratory resistance (Rrs) at baseline (both 5 Hz and 19 Hz) significantly correlated to AQLQ improvement (r = - 0.52 and r = - 0.53 respectively, p = 0.01 (both)). Borderline significant correlations with ACQ improvement were found (r = 0.30 p = 0.16 for 5 Hz and r = 0.41 p = 0.05 for 19 Hz).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary function remained stable after BT. Improvement in FEV₁ correlated with asthma questionnaires improvement including AQLQ. Lower FOT-measured respiratory resistance at baseline was associated with favorable BT response, which might reflect targeting of larger airways with BT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02225392; Registered 26 August 2014.

Treatment for intractable asthma: bronchial thermoplasty

Bronchial Thermoplasty (BT) is an epoch-making treatment that reduces bronchial smooth muscle by using a bronchoscope to reach the basket catheter to the bronchus and directing high-frequency current directly into the bronchi. In GINA Guidelines 2019, BT is considered to be additional treatment at Step V (the most severe), and the evidence level is B. The Japanese guidelines (JGL) also added BT as a treatment for Step 4, but it is reserved because there are still unclear points regarding long-term efficacy and safety. In Japan, as of April 1, 2019, 672 treatments were performed at 123 institutions nationwide. The average age of patients was 54.1 years, but 84 cases were over 70 years old. The average value of %FEV1 was 78.2%, but there were 94 cases less than 60%. There were 32 cases that underwent BT treatment at our institution. Of them, 12 cases with progress up to one year later could be observed. The average age was 56.1 years old, and each of 6 men and women had a %FEV1 of 70.5%. One year later, AQLQ and %FEV1 improved, and the number of exacerbations decreased, but exhaled NO values increased. %FEV1 improvement might be due to poorer lung function (70.5% vs. 77.8%) and more BT activation (average 1.28 times AIR2) compared to the AIR2 trial. In terms of improvement in %FEV1, patients with moderate obstructive disorder from 50 to 80% responded well after BT treatment. In the near future, various new antibody preparations such as IL-4 / 13 antibody and anti-TSLP antibody are expected to be promoted. Therefore, we first consider whether these antibody preparations can be applied to patients with refractory asthma. We consider that BT is indicated only when there is no indication or no expected effect of antibody preparations. In other words, BT treatment is the last resort of intractable asthma, and it is the duty of medical professionals involved in BT treatment to be able to advocate when it is best to give BT to such patients.

Recent Developments In Bronchial Thermoplasty For Severe Asthma

PURPOSE

Bronchial thermoplasty is approved in many countries worldwide as a non-pharmacological treatment for severe asthma. This review summarizes recent publications on the selection of patients with severe asthma for bronchial thermoplasty, predictors of a beneficial response and developments in the procedure and discusses specific issues about bronchial thermoplasty including effectiveness in clinical practice, mechanism of action, cost-effectiveness, and place in management.

RESULTS

Bronchial thermoplasty is a treatment option for patients with severe asthma after assessment and management of causes of difficult-to-control asthma, such as nonadherence, poor inhaler technique, comorbidities, under treatment, and other behavioral factors. Patients treated with bronchial thermoplasty in clinical practice have worse baseline characteristics and comparable clinical outcomes to clinical trial data. Bronchial thermoplasty causes a reduction in airway smooth muscle mass although it is uncertain whether this effect explains its efficacy since other mechanisms of action may be relevant, such as alterations in airway epithelial, gland, and/or nerve function; improvements in small airway function; or a placebo effect. The cost-effectiveness of bronchial thermoplasty is greater in countries where the costs of hospitalization and emergency department are high. The place of bronchial thermoplasty in the management of severe asthma is not certain, although some experts propose that bronchial thermoplasty should be considered for patients with severe asthma associated with non-type 2 inflammation or who fail to respond favorably to biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Bronchial thermoplasty is a modestly effective treatment for severe asthma after assessment and management of causes of difficult-to-control asthma. Asthma morbidity increases during and shortly after treatment. Follow-up studies provide reassurance on the long-term safety of the procedure. Uncertainties remain about predictors of response, mechanism(s) of action, and place in management of severe asthma.

Predicting the Response to Bronchial Thermoplasty

BACKGROUND

Although it is established that not all patients respond to bronchial thermoplasty (BT), the factors that predict response/nonresponse are largely unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To identify baseline factors that predict clinical response.

METHODS

The records of 77 consecutive patients entered into the Australian Bronchial Thermoplasty Registry were examined for baseline clinical characteristics, and outcomes measured at 6 and 12 months after BT, such as change in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score, exacerbation frequency, the requirement for short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) medication and oral corticosteroids, and improvement in spirometry.

RESULTS

This was a cohort of patients with severe asthma: aged 57.7 ± 11.4 years, 57.1% females, 53.2% of patients taking maintenance oral steroids, 43% having been treated with an mAb, mean FEV₁ of 55.8% ± 19.8% predicted.

RESULTS

BT resulted in an improvement in the ACQ score from 3.2 ± 1.0 at baseline to 1.6 ± 1.1 at 6 months (P < .001). Exacerbation frequency in the previous 6 months reduced from 3.7 ± 3.3 to 0.7 ± 1.2 (P < .001). SABA requirement reduced from 9.3 ± 7.1 puffs/d to 3.5 ± 6.0 (P < .001), and 48.8% of patients were weaned completely off oral steroids. A significant improvement in FEV₁ was observed. Using multiple linear regression models, baseline ACQ score strongly predicted improvement in ACQ score (P < .001). Patients with an exacerbation frequency greater than twice in the previous 6 months showed the greatest reduction in exacerbations (-5.3 ± 2.8; P < .001). Patients using more than 10 puffs/d of SABA experienced the greatest reduction in SABA requirement (-12.4 ± 10.5 puffs, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The most severely afflicted patients had the greatest improvements in ACQ score, exacerbation frequency, and medication requirement.

Bronchial thermoplasty increases airway volume measured by functional respiratory imaging

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to use CT scanning with computational fluid dynamics to evaluate the mechanisms by which Bronchial Thermoplasty (BT) improves asthmatic symptoms.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a university teaching hospital, experienced in performing BT. Imaging studies were performed before, and after, BT of the left lung, and prior to treatment of the right lung, which therefore acted as a control. On each occasion, two high-resolution CT scans were performed, one at full inspiration (TLC) and the other at Functional Residual Capacity (FRC). The study protocol was offered to 10 patients, all of whom met the definition of severe asthma, despite high dose inhaled corticosteroids and dual long acting bronchodilators.

RESULTS

Significant increases in airway luminal volume were observed on the treated side, compared with control, at both full inspiration (by 27%) and at FRC (by 17%). The ratio of distal airway volume to lung volume significantly increased on the treated side. The change in airway volume with inspiration from FRC increased by 48% on the treated side compared to 5% in the control lung, suggesting treatment increased airway distensibility. No effect was observed on airway wall thickness, nor air trapping. There was a trend towards correlation between the improvement in airway volume at TLC and improvement in symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that BT increases the luminal airway volume on the treated side compared to the control lung. We suggest that this is an important link between the airway smooth muscle atrophy demonstrated pathologically, and the improvement in symptoms observed clinically.

Dismantling the pathophysiology of asthma using imaging

Asthma remains an important disease worldwide, causing high burden to patients and healthcare systems and presenting a need for better management and ultimately prevention and cure. Asthma is a very heterogeneous condition, with many different pathophysiological processes. Better measurement of those pathophysiological processes are needed to better phenotype disease, and to go beyond the current, highly limited measurements that are currently used: spirometry and symptoms. Sophisticated three-dimensional lung imaging using computed tomography and ventilation imaging (single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography) and magnetic resonance imaging and methods of lung imaging applicable to asthma research are now highly developed. The body of current evidence suggests that abnormalities in structure and ventilatory function measured by imaging are clinically relevant, given their associations with disease severity, exacerbation risk and airflow obstruction. Therefore, lung imaging is ready for more widespread use in clinical trials and to become part of routine clinical assessment of asthma.