Employment of an algorithm of care including chest physiotherapy results in reduced hospitalizations and stability of lung function in bronchiectasis

Effects of High Frequency Chest Wall Oscillation (HFCWO) on Clinical Symptoms in COPD

Background

Mucociliary clearance plays a critical role in pulmonary host defense. Abnormal mucociliary clearance contributes to the pathogenesis of pulmonary disorders, including COPD. In bronchiectasis, treatments targeting mucus obstruction in the airways include the use of high frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) therapy. This prospective outcome based study was designed to investigate the changes in symptoms and quality of life (QOL) to measure the effect of adjunctive HFCWO therapy to standard of care therapy for patients with COPD.

Research Question

When HFCWO is indicated and used as intended, will the quality of life for those patients with COPD improve and sustain improvement.

Study Design and Methods

We conducted a prospective, openl-label, observational study in COPD patients without concomitant bronchiectasis. Participants had assessments of QOL at baseline (day 0) and then at 30 and 90 days after initiation of HFCWO therapy. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD Patients (SGRQ-C) was employed and longitudinally followed at each timepoint. Paired t-tests were used to compare means between each time points adjusted for multiple comparisons. A linear mixed model for the analysis of longitudinal data was then constructed to determine the simultaneous contribution of race, gender, ethnicity, time, and selected interactions in the primary outcome of change in SGRQ-C across 0, 30, and 90 days.

Results

The cohort of patients (n=102) demonstrated a significant reduction in the SGRQ-C at 30 and sustained at 90 days compared to baseline. In addition, two component scores of the SGRQ-C questionnaire ("Symptoms" and Impacts") were significantly reduced at 30 and 90 days.

Interpretation

This prospective, observational study demonstrates statistically significant and clinically favorable responses to HFCWO as an adjunctive therapy for patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD without concomitant bronchiectasis. Results of this study inform the design of additional additional studies of HFCWO to prove efficacy inCOPD patients.

Pilot Evaluation of a Management Toolkit for Airway Clearance Therapy in Bronchiectasis (IMPACT BE)

Background

Airway clearance therapies (ACTs) are recommended as an integral part of the management of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (BE) to prevent inflammation, mucus accumulation, and infection that occur because of ineffective secretion clearance. Adherence to ACTs is low, in part because of perceived burden and a lack of standardization of education and training programs for patients. Poor adherence is associated with more frequent exacerbations, worse health outcomes, and worse quality of life. Structured educational programs increase adherence to ACT among people with cystic fibrosis and may show similar results for people with BE.

Objective

This pilot study evaluated the feasibility, clinical utility, sustainability, and expert opinions of this educational program addressing gaps in ACT knowledge and skills in people with BE.

Methods

The Individual Management of Patient Airway Clearance Therapy- Bronchiectasis (IMPACT BE) was implemented in nine BE centers with 100 patients. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from patients and providers.

Results

The IMPACT BE program demonstrated good uptake in a clinic setting by multidisciplinary team members, with improvements in medical teams' evaluation of their ability to provide education to patients. All healthcare teams indicated that this program could become a sustainable part of their clinic. Qualitative responses from patients indicated the program was comprehensive and easy to use.

Conclusion

In this pilot study, IMPACT BE was found to be useful in teaching airway clearance to people with BE. The open-access toolkit was well received by both patients and a diverse array of providers in a clinic setting.

Real-life experience with high-frequency chest wall oscillation vest therapy in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

Background:

High frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) has long been used for airway clearance for patients with cystic fibrosis. Only limited research has evaluated this therapy in adult patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB).

Methods:

Data from 2596 patients from a registry of adult bronchiectasis patients using HFCWO therapy was used to evaluate hospitalization patterns before and after initiation of HFCWO therapy, as well as antibiotic use and self-reported metrics of quality of life. Self-reported outcomes were also reviewed by cross-checking with sampled patient charts and found to be consistent.

Results:

The number of patients who had at least one respiratory-related hospitalization decreased from 49.1% (192/391) in the year before to 24.0% (94/391) in the year after starting HFCWO therapy (p-value < 0.001). At the same time, the number of patients who required three or more hospitalizations dropped from 14.3% (56/391) to 5.6% (22/391). Patients currently taking oral antibiotics for respiratory conditions decreased from 57.7% upon initiation of therapy to 29.9% within 1 year (p < 0.001). Patients who subjectively rated their “overall respiratory health” as good to excellent increased from 13.6% upon initiation of therapy to 60.5% in 1 year (p < 0.001) and those who rated their “ability to clear your lungs” as good to excellent increased from 13.9% to 76.6% (p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

NCFB patients showed improved self-reported outcomes associated with the initiation of HFCWO therapy as measured by number of hospitalizations, antibiotic use, and the subjective experience of airway clearance. The improvement was observed early on after initiation of therapy and sustained for at least 1 year.

The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high-frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device

BACKGROUND

Chest physiotherapy (CPT) is a non-pharmacological therapy to facilitate airway secretion removal. There have been concerns about potential electromagnetic interference (EMI) and lead integrity problems during the use of vibrating CPT devices in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

HYPOTHESIS

Two CPT devices can be used safely in patients with CIED.

METHODS

Volunteer patients with CIED underwent device interrogation to check lead integrity and device function before and after application of CPT devices. Mechanical lung vibrator and high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) vests were used while monitoring surface electrocardiograms and intra-cardiac electrograms.

RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 46 patients with CIEDs (25 pacemakers, 15 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and six cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators). There was no noise detection or EMI during CPT in any patient. None of the patients showed clinically significant changes in lead integrity parameters. HFCWO inappropriately accelerated the pacing rate up to the maximal programmed value in five patients with pacemakers and two with cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators.

CONCLUSION

CPT may be safely applied to patients with CIED without compromising lead integrity or device function, except for unwanted increase in pacing rate caused by misdetection of chest wall vibration as patients' activity while using HFCWO. Deactivation of the accelerometer-based activity sensor may be needed when HFCWO is planned for CPT.

[Effects of high frequency chest wall oscillatory (HFCWO) therapy on gas exchange and ventilation in healthy participants]

INTRODUCTION

Chest physiotherapy is an essential part of the treatment of respiratory diseases with increased respiratory secretion and ineffective cough. To date, there have been no studies on the effect of high frequency chest wall oscillatory (HFCWO) therapy on respiratory muscle strength, ventilation and gas exchange. The aim of this study was therefore to assess these three factors in healthy participants.

METHODS

Respiratory muscle strength was measured before and immediately after HFCWO therapy in 25 healthy participants. During the treatment, we continuously measured ventilation parameters, gas exchange, oxygen saturation and heart rate. All participants underwent HFCWO sessions twice (with 24hours difference) with the same procedure. Symptoms during the session and discomfort were measured with the visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

HFCWO therapy produced a change in breathing pattern with increased ventilation associated with altered gas exchange. Heart rate also increased, with no changes in oxygenation. There was no effect, either beneficial or deleterious, on the strength of respiratory muscles. Up to 20% of participants reported substantial discomfort (VAS≥5/10) during the session.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that, during the application of HFCWO therapy in healthy participants, ventilation and heart rate increased. However, there were undesirable effects on gas exchange with a high degree of intolerance among volunteers, with no effects on respiratory muscle strength.

Effectiveness of two high frequency chest wall oscillation techniques in patients with bronchiectasis: a randomized controlled preliminary study

BACKGROUND

Chest physiotherapy is an important tool in the treatment of bronchiectasis. High frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) is a technique designed to create a global percussion of the lung which moves secretions and probably clears the peripheral bronchial tree. We propose the comparison between an existing device (SmartVest) and a new device (RespIn 11).

METHODS

Sixty patients were randomized into three groups: a group was treated with SmartVest, a group with RespIn 11, and a group with pharmacological therapy alone. Primary outcome measures included exacerbations at 3, 6 and 12 months after the end of treatment. Secondary outcome measures were pulmonary function testing, arterial blood gas analysis (ABG), and hematological examinations, cough, dyspnea, health and quality of life scores (Bronchiectasis Health Questionnaire [BHQ], Breathlessness, Cough, and Sputum Scale [BCSS], COPD Assessment Test [CAT], Leicester Cough Questionnaire [LCT]). A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate patient's preference.

RESULTS

Both patients in the HFCWO groups showed a significant improvement in the tests of dyspnea, cough and health and quality of life score evaluations (BHQ, BCSS, CAT, LCT) compared to the control group, but not in pulmonary function tests and ABG. Only RespIn 11 significantly reduced exacerbations in comparison with the control group. RespIn 11 also had a higher score regarding patients' preference.

CONCLUSIONS

The two machines have improved health and quality of life scores in patients with bronchiectasis. RespIn 11 also demonstrated a significant lowering of exacerbations and a better patient acceptance.