One-year clinically important deterioration and long-term clinical course in Japanese patients with COPD: a multicenter observational cohort study

Tiotropium reduces clinically important deterioration in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A post hoc analysis of the Tie-COPD study

BACKGROUND

Clinically important deterioration (CID) is a composite endpoint used to holistically assess the complex progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Tiotropium improves lung function and reduces the rate of COPD exacerbations in patients with COPD of Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 1 (mild) or 2 (moderate). However, whether tiotropium reduces CID risk in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD remains unclear.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the 24-month Tie-COPD study comparing 18 μg tiotropium with placebo in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD. CID was defined as a decrease of ≥100 mL in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s, an increase of ≥2 unit in COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, or moderate-to-severe exacerbation. The time to the first occurrence of one of these events was recorded as the time to the first CID. Subgroup analyses were conducted among patients stratified by CAT score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score, and GOLD stage at baseline.

RESULTS

Of the 841 randomized patients, 771 were included in the full analysis set. Overall, 643 patients (83.4 %) experienced at least one CID event. Tiotropium significantly reduced the CID risk and delayed the time to first CID compared with placebo (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.58, 95 % confidence interval = 0.49-0.68, P < 0.001). Significant reductions in CID risk were also observed in various subgroups, including patients with a CAT score <10, mMRC score <2, and mild COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Tiotropium reduced CID risk in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD, even in patients with fewer respiratory symptoms or mild disease, which highlights tiotropium's effectiveness in treating COPD patients with mild disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Tie-COPD, NCT01455129).

Clinical characteristics and natural course of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and/or asthma in Japanese patients: a summary report of two Hokkaido-based cohort studies

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are the most common chronic airway diseases and are characterized by chronic airway inflammation and airflow limitation. Japanese patients with COPD or asthma have characteristics different from those of Westerners. Therefore, understanding the characteristics and clinical course of Japanese patients with COPD and those with asthma, particularly severe asthma, is critical for their management and appropriate treatment. The Hokkaido COPD cohort and Hokkaido-based Investigative Cohort Analysis for Refractory Asthma (Hi-CARAT) are high-quality cohort studies of COPD and asthma in the Japanese population and provide valuable data. This report summarizes the clinical findings from the two cohort studies and provides data for more appropriate management of Japanese patients with COPD and/or asthma. Overall, 279 patients with COPD were followed up for up to 10 years in the Hokkaido COPD cohort study, and 127 with severe asthma were followed up for up to 6 years in the Hi-CARAT study. Seventy-nine patients with mild-to-moderate asthma provided baseline data for the Hi-CARAT study. In each disease, several distinct factors, including systemic status and non-pulmonary factors, were associated with important clinical outcomes, such as lung function decline, exacerbations, impaired quality of life, and mortality. Therefore, multifaceted evaluation based on the characteristics of the Japanese population is necessary for the management of COPD and asthma.

Clinically important deterioration: a composite tool for managing patients with COPD

Clinically important deterioration (CID) is a composite tool developed to measure COPD's progression. It is a promising concept that can improve treatment choices for COPD patients because it provides a more holistic assessment of their status in everyday clinical practice. The post hoc analysis of several trials that were important for improving COPD treatment provides increasing evidence of the importance of assessing CID. These retrospective evaluations suggest that dual bronchodilation should be preferred over a single bronchodilator if treatment aims to reduce a possible clinical deterioration of COPD. Should dual bronchodilation prove ineffective, evidence shows that triple therapy, including an inhaled corticosteroid, is effective in preventing CID, especially in the presence of high blood eosinophil counts. CID initially included changes in FEV₁ ≥100 mL from baseline, an increase in total SGRQ score ≥4 units, or a moderate/severe exacerbation. These thresholds were chosen arbitrarily because they were considered clinically relevant. Therefore, this multidimensional tool is being improved by including outcomes and thresholds that consider the peculiarities of the COPD population and the duration of the assessment. However, at present, studies that have assessed the impact of CID on COPD are almost all retrospective. Therefore, prospective studies need to be conducted that allow the complete validation of this instrument and better define the most effective components in assessing the risk of deterioration of COPD.

Annual Body Weight Change and Prognosis in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Purpose

Low body mass index (BMI) has been reported to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In contrast, a detailed analysis of the association between body weight change over time and prognosis is not sufficient, particularly in Japanese patients with COPD who have been reported to be much thinner compared to Westerners. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between annual body weight change and long-term prognosis in Japanese patients with COPD in two independent cohorts.

Patients and Methods

We analyzed 279 patients with COPD who participated in the Hokkaido COPD cohort study as a discovery cohort. We divided participants into three groups according to quartiles of annual body weight change calculated by the data from the first 5 years: weight loss group (<-0.17 kg/year), no change group (−0.17 to ≤0.20 kg/year), and weight gain group (>0.20 kg/year). The association between annual body weight change and prognosis was replicated in the Kyoto University cohort (n = 247).

Results

In the Hokkaido COPD cohort study, the weight loss group had significantly worse mortality than the other groups, whereas there was no difference in BMI at baseline. In the multivariate analysis, annual body weight change was an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality, which was confirmed in the Kyoto University cohort.

Conclusion

Annual body weight loss is associated with poor prognosis in Japanese patients with COPD, independent of baseline BMI. Longitudinal assessment of body weight is important for the management of COPD.