1
|
Park H, Lee J, Choi Y, Kim JH, Kim S, Kim YR, Lee CH, Park SB, Kim KT, Rhee JM, Kim CH. Screening patients requiring secondary lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar spine diseases: a nationwide sample cohort study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1295. [PMID: 38221532 PMCID: PMC10788335 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51861-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aims to identify healthcare costs indicators predicting secondary surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease (DLSD), which significantly impacts healthcare budgets. Analyzing data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) database of Republic of Korea (ROK), the study included 3881 patients who had surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis (LSS without SPL), lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis (LSS with SPL), and spondylolysis (SP) from 2006 to 2008. Patients were categorized into two groups: those undergoing secondary surgery (S-group) and those not (NS-group). Surgical and interim costs were compared, with S-group having higher secondary surgery costs ($1829.59 vs $1618.40 in NS-group, P = 0.002) and higher interim costs ($30.03; 1.86% of initial surgery costs vs $16.09; 0.99% of initial surgery costs in NS-group, P < 0.0001). The same trend was observed in LDH, LSS without SPL, and LSS with SPL (P < 0.0001). Monitoring interim costs trends post-initial surgery can effectively identify patients requiring secondary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hangeul Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhee Lee
- Division of Medical Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Yunhee Choi
- Division of Medical Statistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun-Hoe Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Sum Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Rak Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Hyun Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Bae Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Boramae Medical Center, 20, Boramae-ro 5-gil, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung-Tae Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - John M Rhee
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Chi Heon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Medical Device Development, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rashed R, Kowalski K, Walton D, Niazigharemakhe A, Rushton A. Physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors to predict outcomes in low back pain: Protocol for a systematic review. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0295761. [PMID: 38079434 PMCID: PMC10712879 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a highly prevalent condition that substantially impairs individuals' physical functioning. This highlights the need for effective management strategies to improve patient outcomes. It is, therefore, crucial to have knowledge of physical functioning prognostic factors that can predict outcomes to facilitate the development of targeted treatment plans aiming to achieve better patient outcomes. There is no synthesis of evidence for physical functioning measures as prognostic factors in the LBP population. The objective of this systematic review is to synthesize evidence for physical measures of physical functioning as prognostic factors to predict outcomes in LBP. METHODS The protocol is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Prospective longitudinal observational studies investigating potential physical prognostic factors in LBP and/or low back-related leg pain population will be included, with no restriction on outcome. Searches will be performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL databases, grey literature search using Open Grey System and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, hand-searching journals, and reference lists of included studies. Two independent reviewers will evaluate the eligibility of studies, extract data, assess risk of bias and quality of evidence. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Quality in Prognostic Studies (QUIPS) tool. Adequacy of clinical, methodological, and statistical homogeneity among included studies will decide quantitative (meta-analysis) or qualitative analysis (narrative synthesis) focused on prognostic factors and strength of association with outcomes. Quality of cumulative evidence will be evaluated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). DISCUSSION Information about prognostic factors can be used to predict outcomes in LBP. Accurate outcome prediction is essential for identifying high-risk patients that allows targeted allocation of healthcare resources, ultimately reducing the healthcare burden. REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42023406796.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rameeza Rashed
- School of Physiotherapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katie Kowalski
- School of Physiotherapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Walton
- School of Physiotherapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Alison Rushton
- School of Physiotherapy, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ishibashi Y, Tomita Y, Imura S, Takeuchi N. Preoperative Motor Function Associated with Short-Term Gain of Health-Related Quality of Life after Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Pilot Prospective Cohort Study in Japan. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:3103. [PMID: 38131993 PMCID: PMC10742417 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11243103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to estimate the relationship between preoperative motor function and short-term recovery of health-related quality of life after lumbar surgery in patients with lumbar degenerative disease. This prospective cohort study involved 50 patients with lumbar degenerative disease at a general hospital in Japan. The primary outcome was the achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for EuroQOL 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) at discharge. Preoperative demographic, medication, surgical, and physical function data were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed using the achievement of MCID for EQ-5D as the dependent variable and preoperative characteristics, including the Five Times Sit to Stand test (FTSTS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), as the independent variables. The logistic regression analysis showed that Model 1 had a moderate predictive accuracy (Nagelkerke R2: 0.20; Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.19; predictive accuracy: 70.0%). Among the independent variables in the logistic regression model, the FTSTS was the only independent variable related to the achievement of MCID for EQ-5D at discharge (odds ratio: 0.03; 95% CI: 1.79 × 10-3, 0.18). Our results highlighted the importance of baseline motor function in the postoperative recovery of health-related quality of life in individuals with lumbar degenerative disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuya Ishibashi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health Care, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Takasaki 370-0033, Gunma, Japan; (Y.I.); (S.I.); (N.T.)
- Department of Rehabilitation, Harunaso Hospital, Takasaki 370-3347, Gunma, Japan
- Department of Medical Device Development, mediVR, Inc., Chuo-ku 103-0022, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Tomita
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health Care, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Takasaki 370-0033, Gunma, Japan; (Y.I.); (S.I.); (N.T.)
| | - Shigeyuki Imura
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health Care, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Takasaki 370-0033, Gunma, Japan; (Y.I.); (S.I.); (N.T.)
| | - Nobuyuki Takeuchi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Health Care, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Takasaki 370-0033, Gunma, Japan; (Y.I.); (S.I.); (N.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Geere JH, Hunter PR, Swamy GN, Cook AJ, Rai AS. Development and temporal validation of clinical prediction models for 1-year disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery. The Norwich Lumbar Surgery Predictor (development version). EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:4210-4219. [PMID: 37740114 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07931-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify clinical predictors and build prediction models for 1-year patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after lumbar decompressive surgery for disc herniation or spinal stenosis. METHODS The study included 1835 cases, with or without additional single-level fusion, from a single centre from 2008 through 2020. General linear models imputed with 37 clinical variables identified 18 significant 1-year PROM predictors for retention in development models. Interaction of surgical indication with each predictor was tested. Temporal validation was conducted at the same centre on cases through 2021. R2 was used to measure goodness-of-fit, and area under curve (AUC) used to measure classification to a satisfactory symptom state (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ≤ 22; back or leg pain ≤ 30 out of 100). RESULTS A total 1228 (67%) had complete data for inclusion in model development. Predictors of ODI were baseline PROMs (ODI, back pain, leg pain), work status, condition duration, previous lumbar operation, multiple-joint osteoarthritis, female, diabetes, current smoker, rheumatic disorder, lower limb arthroplasty, mobility aided, provider status, facet cyst, scoliosis, and age, with BMI significantly associated with stenosis. Temporal validation (n = 188) found the ODI model R2 was 0.29 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.18-0.40) and AUC was 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.81). Back and leg pain models had lower R2 (0.12-0.14) and AUC (0.68-0.69) values. CONCLUSION Important PROM predictors are baseline PROMs, specific co-morbidities, work status, condition duration, previous lumbar operation, female, and smoking status. The ODI model predicted the likelihood of achieving a satisfactory state of both disability and pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan H Geere
- Physiotherapy Department, Spire Norwich Hospital, Old Watton Road, Colney, Norwich, NR4 7TD, UK.
| | - Paul R Hunter
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kasir R, Zakko P, Hasan S, Aleem I, Park D, Nerenz D, Abdulhak M, Perez-Cruz M, Schwalb J, Saleh ES, Easton R, Khalil JG. The Duration of Symptoms Influences Outcomes After Lumbar Microdiscectomies: A Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231210469. [PMID: 37918421 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231210469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Cohort. OBJECTIVE We investigate whether duration of symptoms a patient experiences prior to lumbar microdiscectomy affects pain, lifestyle, and return to work metrics after surgery. METHODS A retrospective review of patients with a diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy undergoing microdiscectomy was conducted using a statewide registry. Patients were grouped based on self-reported duration of symptoms prior to surgical intervention (Group 1: symptoms less than 3 months; Group 2: symptoms between 3 months and 1 year; and Group 3: symptoms greater than 1 year). Radicular pain scores, PROMIS PF Physical Function measure (PROMIS PF), EQ-5D scores, and return to work rates at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS There were 2408 patients who underwent microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation for radiculopathy with 532, 910, and 955 in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Postoperative leg pain was lower for Group 1 at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < .05). Postoperative PROMIS PF and EQ-5D scores were higher for Group 1 at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years compared to Groups 2 and 3 (P < .05). CONCLUSION Patients with prolonged symptoms prior to surgical intervention experience smaller improvements in postoperative leg pain, PROMIS PF, and EQ-5D than those who undergo surgery earlier. Patients undergoing surgery within 3 months of symptom onset have the highest rates of return to work at 1 year after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafid Kasir
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Philip Zakko
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Sazid Hasan
- Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA
| | - Ilyas Aleem
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel Park
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - David Nerenz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Muwaffak Abdulhak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Mick Perez-Cruz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Jason Schwalb
- Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Ehab S Saleh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Richard Easton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Jad G Khalil
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Passias PG, Ahmad W, Tretiakov P, Krol O, Segreto F, Lafage R, Lafage V, Soroceanu A, Daniels A, Gum J, Line B, Schoenfeld AJ, Vira S, Hart R, Burton D, Smith JS, Ames CP, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Bess S. Identifying Subsets of Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity Who Maintained a Positive Response to Nonoperative Management. Neurosurgery 2023; 93:480-488. [PMID: 36942962 PMCID: PMC10586862 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adult spinal deformity (ASD) represents a major cause of disability in the elderly population in the United States. Surgical intervention has been shown to reduce disability and pain in properly indicated patients. However, there is a small subset of patients in whom nonoperative treatment is also able to durably maintain or improve symptoms. OBJECTIVE To examine the factors associated with successful nonoperative management in patients with ASD. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 207 patients with nonoperative ASD, stratified into 3 groups: (1) success, (2) no change, and (3) failure. Success was defined as a gain in minimal clinically importance difference in both Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society-Pain. Logistic regression model and conditional inference decision trees established cutoffs for success according to baseline (BL) frailty and sagittal vertical axis. RESULTS In our cohort, 44.9% of patients experienced successful nonoperative treatment, 22.7% exhibited no change, and 32.4% failed. Successful nonoperative patients at BL were significantly younger, had a lower body mass index, decreased Charlson Comorbidity Index, lower frailty scores, lower rates of hypertension, obesity, depression, and neurological dysfunction (all P < .05) and significantly higher rates of grade 0 deformity for all Schwab modifiers (all P < .05). Conditional inference decision tree analysis determined that patients with a BL ASD-frailty index ≤ 1.579 (odds ratio: 8.3 [4.0-17.5], P < .001) were significantly more likely to achieve nonoperative success. CONCLUSION Success of nonoperative treatment was more frequent among younger patients and those with less severe deformity and frailty at BL, with BL frailty the most important determinant factor. The factors presented here may be useful in informing preoperative discussion and clinical decision-making regarding treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G. Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Frank Segreto
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alan Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Brown University, Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Andrew J. Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Utah Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Robert Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Justin S. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Christopher P. Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Christopher Shaffrey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Frank Schwab
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rushton AB, Jadhakhan F, Verra ML, Emms A, Heneghan NR, Falla D, Reddington M, Cole AA, Willems PC, Benneker L, Selvey D, Hutton M, Heymans MW, Staal JB. Predictors of poor outcome following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a prospective observational study to derive two clinical prediction rules using British Spine Registry data. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:2303-2318. [PMID: 37237240 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07754-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Lumbar spinal fusion surgery (LSFS) is common for lumbar degenerative disorders. The objective was to develop clinical prediction rules to identify which patients are likely to have a favourable outcome to inform decisions regarding surgery and rehabilitation. METHODS A prospective observational study recruited 600 (derivation) and 600 (internal validation) consecutive adult patients undergoing LSFS for degenerative lumbar disorder through the British Spine Registry. Definition of good outcome (6 weeks, 12 months) was reduction in pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, 0-10) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI 0-50) > 1.7 and 14.3, respectively. Linear and logistic regression models were fitted and regression coefficients, Odds ratios and 95% CIs reported. RESULTS Lower BMI, higher ODI and higher leg pain pre-operatively were predictive of good disability outcome, higher back pain was predictive of good back pain outcome, and no previous surgery and higher leg pain were predictive of good leg pain outcome; all at 6 weeks. Working and higher leg pain were predictive of good ODI and leg pain outcomes, higher back pain was predictive of good back pain outcome, and higher leg pain was predictive of good leg pain outcome at 12 months. Model performance demonstrated reasonable to good calibration and adequate/very good discrimination. CONCLUSIONS BMI, ODI, leg and back pain and previous surgery are important considerations pre-operatively to inform decisions for surgery. Pre-operative leg and back pain and work status are important considerations to inform decisions for management following surgery. Findings may inform clinical decision making regarding LSFS and associated rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison B Rushton
- School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Feroz Jadhakhan
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martin L Verra
- Department of Physiotherapy, Berne University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andrew Emms
- Department of Physiotherapy, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicola R Heneghan
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Deborah Falla
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain (CPR Spine), School of Sport Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michael Reddington
- Physiotherapy Department, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ashley A Cole
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Paul C Willems
- Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Lorin Benneker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - David Selvey
- Amplitude Clinical, Host of the British Spine Registry, Droitwich, UK
| | - Michael Hutton
- Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre (PEOC), Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Martijn W Heymans
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Bart Staal
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rehman Y, Bala M, Rehman N, Agarwal A, Koperny M, Crandon H, Abdullah R, Hull A, Makhdami N, Grodecki S, Wrzosek A, Lesniak W, Evaniew N, Ashoorion V, Wang L, Couban R, Drew B, Busse JW. Predictors of Recovery Following Lumbar Microdiscectomy for Sciatica: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Cureus 2023; 15:e39664. [PMID: 37388594 PMCID: PMC10307033 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic post-surgical pain is reported by up to 40% of patients after lumbar microdiscectomy for sciatica, a complaint associated with disability and loss of productivity. We conducted a systematic review of observational studies to explore factors associated with persistent leg pain and impairments after microdiscectomy for sciatica. We searched eligible studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL that explored, in an adjusted model, predictors of persistent leg pain, physical impairment, or failure to return to work after microdiscectomy for sciatica. When possible, we pooled estimates of association using random-effects models using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Moderate-certainty evidence showed that the female sex probably has a small association with persistent post-surgical leg pain (odds ratio (OR) = 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.63 to 2.08; absolute risk increase (ARI) = 1.8%, 95% CI = -4.7% to 11.3%), large association with failure to return to work (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.27 to 6.17; ARI = 10.6%, 95% CI = 1.8% to 25.2%), and older age is probably associated with greater postoperative disability (β = 1.47 points on the 100-point Oswestry Disability Index for every 10-year increase from age (>/=18 years), 95% CI = -4.14 to 7.28). Among factors that were not possible to pool, two factors showed promise for future study, namely, legal representation and preoperative opioid use, which showed large associations with worse outcomes after surgery. The moderate-certainty evidence showed female sex is probably associated with persistent leg pain and failure to return to work and that older age is probably associated with greater post-surgical impairment after a microdiscectomy. Future research should explore the association between legal representation and preoperative opioid use with persistent pain and impairment after microdiscectomy for sciatica.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasir Rehman
- Health Research Methodology, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | - Malgorzata Bala
- Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, POL
| | - Nadia Rehman
- Health Research Methods, Impact and Evidence, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | | | - Magdalena Koperny
- Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, POL
| | - Holly Crandon
- Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | - Ream Abdullah
- Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | - Alexandra Hull
- Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | | | | | - Anna Wrzosek
- Interdisciplinary Intensive Care, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, POL
| | | | | | - Vahid Ashoorion
- Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | - Li Wang
- Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | - Rachel Couban
- Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | - Brian Drew
- Neurosurgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | - Jason W Busse
- Health Research Methodology, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Halicka M, Wilby M, Duarte R, Brown C. Predicting patient-reported outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: development and external validation of multivariable prediction models. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:333. [PMID: 37106435 PMCID: PMC10134672 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06446-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to develop and externally validate prediction models of spinal surgery outcomes based on a retrospective review of a prospective clinical database, uniquely comparing multivariate regression and random forest (machine learning) approaches, and identifying the most important predictors. METHODS Outcomes were change in back and leg pain intensity and Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) from baseline to the last available postoperative follow-up (3-24 months), defined as minimal clinically important change (MCID) and continuous change score. Eligible patients underwent lumbar spine surgery for degenerative pathology between 2011 and 2021. Data were split by surgery date into development (N = 2691) and validation (N = 1616) sets for temporal external validation. Multivariate logistic and linear regression, and random forest classification and regression models, were fit to the development data and validated on the external data. RESULTS All models demonstrated good calibration in the validation data. Discrimination ability (area under the curve) for MCID ranged from 0.63 (COMI) to 0.72 (back pain) in regression, and from 0.62 (COMI) to 0.68 (back pain) in random forests. The explained variation in continuous change scores spanned 16%-28% in linear, and 15%-25% in random forests regression. The most important predictors included age, baseline scores on the respective outcome measures, type of degenerative pathology, previous spinal surgeries, smoking status, morbidity, and duration of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS The developed models appear robust and generalisable across different outcomes and modelling approaches but produced only borderline acceptable discrimination ability, suggesting the need to assess further prognostic factors. External validation showed no advantage of the random forest approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Halicka
- Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Martin Wilby
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Rui Duarte
- Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group (LRiG), University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Saluda Medical Pty Ltd., NSW, Artarmon, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nagington A, Foster NE, Snell K, Konstantinou K, Stynes S. Prognostic factors associated with outcome following an epidural steroid injection for disc-related sciatica: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2023; 32:1029-1053. [PMID: 36680619 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07528-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical guidelines recommend epidural steroid injection (ESI) as a treatment option for severe disc-related sciatica, but there is considerable uncertainty about its effectiveness. Currently, we know very little about factors that might be associated with good or poor outcomes from ESI. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise and appraise the evidence investigating prognostic factors associated with outcomes following ESI for patients with imaging confirmed disc-related sciatica. METHODS The search strategy involved the electronic databases Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO and reference lists of eligible studies. Selected papers were quality appraised independently by two reviewers using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Between-study heterogeneity precluded statistical pooling of results. RESULTS 3094 citations were identified; 15 studies were eligible. Overall study quality was low with all judged to have moderate or high risk of bias. Forty-two prognostic factors were identified but were measured inconsistently. The most commonly assessed prognostic factors were related to pain and function (n = 10 studies), imaging features (n = 8 studies), patient socio-demographics (n = 7 studies), health and lifestyle (n = 6 studies), clinical assessment findings (n = 4 studies) and injection level (n = 4 studies). No prognostic factor was found to be consistently associated with outcomes following ESI. Most studies found no association or results that conflicted with other studies. CONCLUSIONS There is little, and low quality, evidence to guide practice in terms of factors that predict outcomes in patients following ESI for disc-related sciatica. The results can help inform some of the decisions about potential prognostic factors that should be assessed in future well-designed prospective cohort studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Nagington
- Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Stoke On Trent, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.,Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Kym Snell
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Kika Konstantinou
- Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Stoke On Trent, Staffordshire, UK.,Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Siobhán Stynes
- Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Haywood Hospital, Stoke On Trent, Staffordshire, UK. .,Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Willems SJ, Coppieters MW, Rooker S, Ostelo R, Hoekstra T, Scholten-Peeters GGM. Variability in recovery following microdiscectomy and postoperative physiotherapy for lumbar radiculopathy: A latent class trajectory analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022; 224:107551. [PMID: 36563569 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The clinical course of lumbar radiculopathy following microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy varies substantially. No prior studies assessed this variability by deriving outcome trajectories. The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the variability in long-term recovery after lumbar microdiscectomy followed by post-operative physiotherapy and to identify outcome trajectories. The secondary aim was to assess whether demographic, clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures routinely collected at baseline could predict poor outcome trajectories. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study with a 24-month follow-up. We included 479 patients with clinical signs and symptoms of lumbar radiculopathy confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings, who underwent microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy. Outcomes were leg pain and back pain measured with Visual Analogue Scales, and disability measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were performed to present the average and the individual clinical course. A latent class trajectory analysis was conducted to identify leg pain, back pain, and disability outcome trajectories. The best number of clusters was determined using the Bayesian Information Criterion, Akaike's information criteria, entropy, and overall interpretability. Prediction models for poor outcome trajectories were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Several outcome trajectories were identified. Most patients were assigned to the 'large improvement' trajectory (leg pain: 79.3%; back pain: 70.2%; disability: 59.5% of patients). Smaller proportions of patients were assigned to the 'moderate improvement' trajectory (leg pain: 7.9%; back pain: 10.6%; disability: 20.7% of patients), the 'minimal improvement' trajectory (leg pain: 4.9%, back pain: 6.7%, disability: 16.3% of patients) and the 'relapse' trajectory (leg pain: 7.9%; back pain: 12.5%; disability: 3.5%). Approximately one-third of patients (32.6%) belonged to one or more than one poor outcome trajectory. Patients with previous treatment (prior back surgery, injection therapy, and medication use) and those who had higher baseline pain and disability scores were more likely to belong to the poor outcome trajectories in comparison to the large improvement trajectories in back pain, leg pain and disability, and the moderate improvement trajectory in disability. The explained variance (Nagelkerke R2) of the prediction models ranged from 0.06 to 0.13 and the discriminative ability (Area Under the Curve) from 0.66 to 0.73. CONCLUSION The clinical course of lumbar radiculopathy varied following microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy, and several outcome trajectories could be identified. Although most patients were allocated to favorable trajectories, one in three patients was assigned to one or more poor outcome trajectories following microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy for lumbar radiculopathy. Routinely gathered data were unable to predict the poor outcome trajectories accurately. Prior to surgery, clinicians should discuss the high variability and the distinctive subgroups that are present in the clinical course with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn J Willems
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Michel W Coppieters
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Gold Coast, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Gold Coast, Australia.
| | - Servan Rooker
- Department of Neurosurgery Kliniek ViaSana, Mill, the Netherlands; Department of Family medicine and population health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Raymond Ostelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute,Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Location VUmc, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Trynke Hoekstra
- Department of Health Sciences and the Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xie N, Wilson PJ, Reddy R. Use of machine learning to model surgical decision-making in lumbar spine surgery. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2022; 31:2000-2006. [PMID: 35088119 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07104-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The majority of lumbar spine surgery referrals do not proceed to surgery. Early identification of surgical candidates in the referral process could expedite their care, whilst allowing timelier implementation of non-operative strategies for those who are unlikely to require surgery. By identifying clinical and imaging features associated with progression to surgery in the literature, we aimed to develop a machine learning model able to mirror surgical decision-making and calculate the chance of surgery based on the identified features. MATERIAL AND METHODS In total, 55 factors were identified to predict surgical progression. All patients presenting with a lumbar spine complaint between 2013 and 2019 at a single Australian Tertiary Hospital (n = 483) had their medical records reviewed and relevant data collected. An Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was constructed to predict surgical candidacy. The model was evaluated on its accuracy, discrimination, and calibration. RESULTS Eight clinical and imaging predictive variables were included in the final model. The ANN was able to predict surgical progression with 92.1% accuracy. It also exhibited excellent discriminative ability (AUC = 0.90), with good fit of data (Calibration slope 0.938, Calibration intercept - 0.379, HLT > 0.05). CONCLUSION Through use of machine learning techniques, we were able to model surgical decision-making with a high degree of accuracy. By demonstrating that the operating patterns of single centres can be modelled successfully, the potential for more targeted and tailored referrals becomes possible, reducing outpatient wait-list duration and increasing surgical conversion rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Xie
- School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, High Street, Kensington, Sydney, 2052, Australia.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Peter J Wilson
- School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, High Street, Kensington, Sydney, 2052, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rajesh Reddy
- School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, High Street, Kensington, Sydney, 2052, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Halicka M, Duarte R, Catherall S, Maden M, Coetsee M, Wilby M, Brown C. Predictors of Pain and Disability Outcomes Following Spinal Surgery for Chronic Low Back and Radicular Pain: A Systematic Review. Clin J Pain 2022; 38:368-380. [PMID: 35413024 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000001033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Success rates of spinal surgeries to treat chronic back pain are highly variable and useable prognostic indicators are lacking. We aimed to identify and evaluate preoperative predictors of pain and disability after spinal surgery for chronic low back/leg pain. METHODS Electronic database (01/1984-03/2021) and reference searches identified 2622 unique citations. Eligible studies included adults with chronic low back/leg pain lasting ≥3 months undergoing first elective lumbar spine surgery, and outcomes defined as change in pain (primary)/disability (secondary) after ≥3 months. We included 21 reports (6899 participants), 7 were judged to have low and 14 high risks of bias. We performed narrative synthesis and determined the quality of evidence (QoE). RESULTS Better pain outcomes were associated with younger age, higher education, and no spinal stenosis (low QoE); lower preoperative pain, fewer comorbidities, lower pain catastrophizing, anxiety and depression (very low QoE); but not with symptom duration (moderate QoE), other sociodemographic factors (low QoE), disability, or sensory testing (very low QoE). More favorable disability outcomes were associated with preoperative sensory loss (moderate QoE); lower job-related resignation and neuroticism (very low QoE); but not with socioeconomic factors, comorbidities (low QoE), demographics, pain, or pain-related psychological factors (very low QoE). DISCUSSION In conclusion, absence of spinal stenosis potentially predicts greater pain relief and preoperative sensory loss likely predicts reduction in disability. Overall, QoE for most identified associations was low/very low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rui Duarte
- Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group (LRiG)
| | | | | | | | - Martin Wilby
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tegner H, Garval M, Rolving N, Esbensen BA, Bech-Azeddine R, Henriksen M. Physiotherapists’ prognosis of 1-year outcome after lumbar spinal fusion - A prospective cohort study. Physiother Theory Pract 2022:1-12. [DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2042880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Tegner
- Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Mette Garval
- Elective Surgery Centre, Silkeborg Regional Hospital, Silkeborg, Denmark
| | - Nanna Rolving
- Central Denmark Region, DEFACTUM, Corporate Quality, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Bente Appel Esbensen
- Copenhagen Spine Research Unit, Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Rachid Bech-Azeddine
- Copenhagen Spine Research Unit, Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Marius Henriksen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Phys Ther Sport 2021; 53:115-142. [PMID: 34896673 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are common. Many patients undergo ACL reconstruction (ACLR), with rehabilitation key to successful outcome. Understanding physical prognostic factors is integral to clinical decision-making, but factors predicting outcome are inadequately defined. The objective was to establish physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following ACLR. METHODS A systematic review following a published protocol (CRD42019127732) searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, key journals and grey literature to November 28, 2020. Prospective cohort studies, participants ≥16 years of age who had undergone ACLR were included, with multi-ligament and/or ACL repair surgery, and studies not published in English excluded. Two independent reviewers conducted searches, extracted data, assessed risk of bias (QUIPS) and overall quality of evidence (GRADE). Meta-analysis was not possible, therefore narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS 13 studies (16 articles) were included (1 low, 12 high risk of bias). Low-level evidence supports postoperative degenerative changes and poor lower-limb strength predicting poorer outcome long term (KOOS). Very low-level evidence supports greater postoperative quadriceps strength predicting improved functional performance medium term; with lower body mass index predicting improvement of multiple outcome measures. CONCLUSION Limited evidence of low or very low-level indicates multiple prognostic factors predicting outcome following ACLR. A high-quality prognostic study is required.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hamawandi SA, Sulaiman II, Abdulhameed AM. Effect of Duration of Symptoms on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Orthop Surg 2021; 14:157-168. [PMID: 34866340 PMCID: PMC8755886 DOI: 10.1111/os.13114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The objective is to determine whether the preoperative duration of symptoms can affect the clinical and functional outcomes after microdiscectomy. Method This study is a single blind randomized controlled trial with level 1 evidence. From 3 January 2016 to 15 February 2017, 122 adult patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation were divided randomly by computer system into three groups were treated by microdiscectomy at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months from onset of symptoms respectively. Ninety‐seven patients, age (19–47) years, 42 males and 55 females, were analyzed at the end of this study with 3 years of follow up. Primary outcome measures are Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland‐Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain and leg pain. Secondary outcome measures are post‐operative complications, length of hospital stay and time of return to daily activities. Results There was significant difference in VAS for back pain among study groups (P = 0.002) at 2 weeks). There were significant differences in VAS for leg pain among study groups (P < 0.001) at 2 weeks and at 3 months (P = 0.003). There was significant difference in ODI among study groups at 2 weeks, 3, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years (P = 0.037 at 2 weeks and P < 0.001 at other periods of assessments) and we found that the mean of ODI in group 6 weeks was better than group 3 months and this was better than group 6 months in all periods of assessment. Group 6 weeks was better than group 3 months and this was better than group 6 months in postoperative improvements regarding RMQ with significant difference at 2 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.001) and at 3 months postoperatively (P < 0.001). Conclusion Duration of preoperative symptoms, in patients with lumbar disc herniation, can affect the clinical and functional outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy as the shorter duration of symptoms resulted in better postoperative clinical and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sherwan A Hamawandi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Injam I Sulaiman
- Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Achttien RJ, Powell A, Zoulas K, Staal JB, Rushton A. Prognostic factors for outcome following lumbar spine fusion surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 31:623-668. [PMID: 34705106 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-07018-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective of this study was to identify and evaluate the value of prognostic factors related to disability, pain and quality of life (QoL) for adult patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion surgery (LSFS). METHODS Two reviewers independently searched the literature, assessed eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Key electronic databases were searched [PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PEDro and ZETOC] using pre-defined terms [e.g. LSFS] to 20/9/2020; with additional searching of journals, reference lists and unpublished literature. Prospective cohort studies with ≥ 12-month follow-up after LSFS were included. Narrative synthesis was based on recommendations by Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group. The GRADE tool enabled assessment of certainty of evidence. Prognostic factors and outcome were analysed and summarised when examined in ≥ 2 studies and when results pointed in the same direction in ≥ 75% of studies. RESULTS Sixteen studies (n = 8388, 2 low and 14 high risk of bias) were included with 39 prognostic factors identified. There is low certainty evidence that higher pre-operative severity of leg pain predicts greater improvement of leg pain and that pre-operative working predicts less post-operative disability both at 1-2-year follow-up. Other found associations were of very low certainty evidence. CONCLUSION No moderate to high certainty evidence exists. Use of leg pain and pre-operative working may be valuable predictors of outcome to inform clinical decision-making and advice regarding LSFS surgery. There is need for adequately powered low-risk-of-bias prospective observational studies to further investigate candidate prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Retze J Achttien
- HAN University of Applied Science, Research Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| | - Andrew Powell
- British Canoeing, Lee Valley Whitewater Centre, English Institute of Sport, Station Road, Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire, UK
| | | | - J Bart Staal
- HAN University of Applied Science, Research Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Alison Rushton
- School of Physical, Therapy Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Buser Z, Tekmyster G, Licari H, Lantz JM, Wang JC. Team Approach: Management of an Acute L4-L5 Disc Herniation. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202110000-00001. [PMID: 34637405 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.21.00003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
» Lumbar disc herniation is one of the most common spinal pathologies, often occurring at the L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. The highest incidence has been reported in patients between the fourth and sixth decades of life. » The severity of symptoms is influenced by the patient's risk factors, the location, and the extent and type of disc herniation. » Lumbar disc herniation can be effectively treated with multiple treatment protocols. In most cases, first-line treatment includes oral analgesic medication, activity modification, and physical therapy. When nonoperative treatments do not provide adequate relief, patients may elect to undergo a fluoroscopically guided contrast-enhanced epidural steroid injection. A subgroup of patients whose condition is refractory to any type of nonoperative modalities will proceed to surgery, most commonly an open or minimally invasive discectomy. » The treatment algorithm for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation often is a stepwise approach: failure of initial nonoperative measures leads to more aggressive treatment when symptoms mandate and, as such, necessitates the use of a multidisciplinary team approach. The core team should consist of an interventional physiatrist, an orthopaedic surgeon, a physician assistant, and a physical therapist. Additional team members may include nurses, radiologists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, spine fellows, psychologists, and case managers. » This review article describes a case scenario that uses a multidisciplinary team approach for the treatment of an acute L4-L5 disc herniation in a 31-year-old patient without any major comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zorica Buser
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gene Tekmyster
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hannah Licari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Justin M Lantz
- Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jeffrey C Wang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cuyún Carter G, Mohanty M, Stenger K, Morato Guimaraes C, Singuru S, Basa P, Singh S, Tongbram V, Kuemmel S, Guarneri V, Tolaney SM. Prognostic Factors in Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative (HR+/HER2-) Advanced Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:6537-6566. [PMID: 34447271 PMCID: PMC8384149 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s300869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Advanced breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with several well-defined subtypes, among which, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2–) is most prevalent. Determination of HR and HER2 status influences prognosis and, thus, disease management. Although literature on these prognostic factors exist, especially in the early breast cancer setting, it remains unclear to what extent these factors can guide clinical decision-making in the advanced disease setting. Therefore, we sought to identify the strength and consistency of evidence for prognostic factors in patients with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer. Methods A systematic literature review (SLR) of the major electronic databases was conducted in November 2018 for primary research studies published since 2010. Endpoints of interest were tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Results Seventy-nine studies were included wherein all patients were diagnosed with advanced breast cancer and ≥50% of the population were HR+/HER2–. OS was the most commonly assessed endpoint (n=67) followed by PFS (n=33), BCSS (n=5) and tumor response (n=3). The prognostic factors with strongest evidence of association with worse OS were negative progesterone receptor status, higher tumor grade, higher circulating tumor cell (CTC) count and higher Ki67 level, number of metastatic sites (eg multiple vs single) and sites of metastases (eg presence of liver metastases vs absence), shorter time to recurrence or progression to advanced breast cancer, poor performance status, prior therapy attributes in the early or metastatic setting (type of therapy, treatment line, response of prior therapy), and race (black vs white). The prognostic factors that had strongest evidence of association with PFS included CTC count, number and sites of metastases, and absence of prior therapy or higher lines of therapy in the early or metastatic setting. The directionality of association was consistent for all prognostic factors except between lymph node and OS, and de novo metastatic breast cancer and PFS. Conclusion Multiple disease, treatment, and patient-related prognostic factors impact survival, particularly OS, in patients with HR+/HER2– advanced breast cancer. Treatment outcomes can vary considerably due to these factors. Understanding poorer prognostic factors for patients can result in improved clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maitreyee Mohanty
- Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, ICON Plc, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Shivaprasad Singuru
- Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, ICON Plc, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Pradeep Basa
- Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, ICON Plc, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Sheena Singh
- Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, ICON Plc, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Vanita Tongbram
- Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, ICON Plc, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sherko Kuemmel
- Interdisciplinary Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte (KEM), Essen, Germany.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Valentina Guarneri
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, PD, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS, Padova, PD, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen CM, Sun LW, Tseng C, Chen YC, Wang GC. Surgical outcomes of full endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation over a 10-year period: A retrospective study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0241494. [PMID: 33152001 PMCID: PMC7644033 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has become popular in recent years. Previous studies have proven the efficacy, but few have discussed the possible risk factors of poor outcome. In this study, we reviewed patients who underwent FELD at Changhua Christian Hospital in the past 10 years and sought to identify factors associated with poor surgical outcomes and re-operations. Methods We retrospectively reviewed records from mid-2009 to mid-2018. Patients had undergone FELD and follow-up for ≥1 year were included. Factors included in the outcome evaluations were age, sex, surgical time, body mass index, surgical methods, disc herniation type, extension of herniation, degree of canal compromised, disc degenerative grade, smoking and alcohol use, surgical lumbar level, symptom duration, Oswestry low back disability index, and visual analog scale score. We had evolved from inside-out methods to outside-in methods after 2016, thus, we included this factor in the analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were poor/fair MacNab score and re-operation. Results From mid-2009 to mid-2018, 521 patients met our criteria and were analyzed. The median follow-up was 1685 days (range, 523–3923 days). Thirty-one (6.0%) patients had poor surgical outcomes (fair/poor MacNab score) and 45 (8.6%) patients required re-operation. Prolapsed herniated disc (P < 0.001), higher disc degenerative grade (P = 0.047), higher lumbar level (P = 0.026), longer preoperative symptoms (P < 0.001), and surgery before 2017 (outside-in technique, P = 0.020) were significant factors associated with poor outcomes in univariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, prolapsed herniated disc (P < 0.001), higher disc degenerative grade (P = 0.030), and higher lumbar level (P = 0.046) were statistically significant. The most common adverse symptom was numbness. Factors possibly associated with higher re-operation rate were older age (P = 0.045), alcohol use (P = 0.073) and higher lumbar level (P = 0.069). Only alcohol use showed statistically significant re-operation rates in multivariate analyses (P = 0.035). Conclusions For treating LDH by FELD, we concluded that prolapsed disc, higher disc degenerative grade, higher lumbar level, and longer preoperative symptom duration were possibly associated with unsatisfactory surgical outcomes (poor/fair MacNab score). The outside-in technique might be superior to the inside-out technique. Older age and alcohol use might be associated with a higher re-operation rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chien-Min Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dayeh University, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Li-Wei Sun
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Chun Tseng
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, China Medical University Beigang Hospital, Yunlin County, Taiwan
| | - Ying-Chieh Chen
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Guan-Chyuan Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kent P, Cancelliere C, Boyle E, Cassidy JD, Kongsted A. A conceptual framework for prognostic research. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:172. [PMID: 32600262 PMCID: PMC7325141 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01050-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 06/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostic research has many important purposes, including (i) describing the natural history and clinical course of health conditions, (ii) investigating variables associated with health outcomes of interest, (iii) estimating an individual's probability of developing different outcomes, (iv) investigating the clinical application of prediction models, and (v) investigating determinants of recovery that can inform the development of interventions to improve patient outcomes. But much prognostic research has been poorly conducted and interpreted, indicating that a number of conceptual areas are often misunderstood. Recent initiatives to improve this include the Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Statement. In this paper, we aim to show how different categories of prognostic research relate to each other, to differentiate exploratory and confirmatory studies, discuss moderators and mediators, and to show how important it is to understand study designs and the differences between prediction and causation. MAIN TEXT We propose that there are four main objectives of prognostic studies - description, association, prediction and causation. By causation, we mean the effect of prediction and decision rules on outcomes as determined by intervention studies and the investigation of whether a prognostic factor is a determinant of outcome (on the causal pathway). These either fall under the umbrella of exploratory (description, association, and prediction model development) or confirmatory (prediction model external validation and investigation of causation). Including considerations of causation within a prognostic framework provides a more comprehensive roadmap of how different types of studies conceptually relate to each other, and better clarity about appropriate model performance measures and the inferences that can be drawn from different types of prognostic studies. We also propose definitions of 'candidate prognostic factors', 'prognostic factors', 'prognostic determinants (causal)' and 'prognostic markers (non-causal)'. Furthermore, we address common conceptual misunderstandings related to study design, analysis, and interpretation of multivariable models from the perspectives of association, prediction and causation. CONCLUSION This paper uses a framework to clarify some concepts in prognostic research that remain poorly understood and implemented, to stimulate discussion about how prognostic studies can be strengthened and appropriately interpreted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Kent
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Kent St, Bentley, Perth, WA 6102, Australia. .,Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Carol Cancelliere
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, Ontario Tech University and the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eleanor Boyle
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - J David Cassidy
- Division of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alice Kongsted
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tampin B, Slater H, Jacques A, Lind CRP. Association of quantitative sensory testing parameters with clinical outcome in patients with lumbar radiculopathy undergoing microdiscectomy. Eur J Pain 2020; 24:1377-1392. [PMID: 32383177 PMCID: PMC7496563 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background/Aim This study aimed to establish the somatosensory profile of patients with lumbar radiculopathy at pre‐and post‐microdiscectomy and to explore any association between pre‐surgical quantitative sensory test (QST) parameters and post‐surgical clinical outcomes. Methods A standardized QST protocol was performed in 53 patients (mean age 38 ± 11 years, 26 females) with unilateral L5/S1 radiculopathy in the main pain area (MPA), affected dermatome and contralateral mirror sites and in age‐ and gender‐,and body site‐matched healthy controls. Repeat measures at 3 months included QST, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and numerous other clinical measures; at 12 months, only clinical measures were repeated. A change <30% on the ODI was defined as ‘no clinically meaningful improvement’. Results Patients showed a significant loss of function in their symptomatic leg both in the dermatome (thermal, mechanical, vibration detection p < .002), and MPA (thermal, mechanical, vibration detection, mechanical pain threshold, mechanical pain sensitivity p < .041) and increased cold sensitivity in the MPA (p < .001). Pre‐surgical altered QST parameters improved significantly post‐surgery in the dermatome (p < .018) in the symptomatic leg and in the MPA (p < .010), except for thermal detection thresholds and cold sensitivity. Clinical outcomes improved at 3 and 12 months (p < .001). Seven patients demonstrated <30% change on the ODI at 12 months. Baseline loss of function in mechanical detection in the MPA was associated with <30% change on the ODI at 12 months (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.09–6.37, p = .032). Conclusion Microdiscectomy resulted in improvements in affected somatosensory parameters and clinical outcomes. Pre‐surgical mechanical detection thresholds may be predictive of clinical outcome. Significance This study documented quantitative sensory testing (QST) profiles in patients with lumbar radiculopathy in their main pain area (MPA) and dermatome pre‐ and post‐microdiscectomy and explored associations between QST parameters and clinical outcome. Lumbar radiculopathy was associated with loss of function in modalities mediated by large and small sensory fibres. Microdiscectomy resulted in significant improvements in loss of function and clinical outcomes in 85% of our cohort. Pre‐surgical mechanical detection thresholds in the MPA may be predictive of clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Tampin
- Department of Physiotherapy, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Neurosurgical Service of Western Australia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Helen Slater
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Angela Jacques
- School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Department of Research, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher R P Lind
- Neurosurgical Service of Western Australia, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Siccoli A, Wispelaere MPD, Schröder ML, Staartjes VE. Timing of Surgery in Tubular Microdiscectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation and Its Effect on Functional Impairment Outcomes. Neurospine 2020; 17:204-212. [PMID: 32252169 PMCID: PMC7136121 DOI: 10.14245/ns.1938448.224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective While it has been established that surgery for lumbar disc herniation, excluding emergent indications, should only be performed after weeks of conservative treatment, it has also been established that late surgery is associated with poorer outscomes in terms of leg pain. However, nothing is known concerning the timinig and functional outcome. We quantify the association of time to surgery (TTS) with functional impairment outcome and identify a maximum TTS cutoff.
Methods A consecutive series of patients who underwent tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation was included. A reduction of ≥ 30% in the Oswestry Disability Index from baseline to 12 months was defined as the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). TTS was defined as time of symptom onset to surgery in weeks. The maximum TTS cutoffs were derived both quantitatively by an area under the curve (AUC) analysis, as well as qualitatively based on cutoff-specific MCID rates.
Results Inclusion was met by 372 patients, among which 327 (87.9%) achieved MCID. MCID achievement was associated with lower TTS (hazard ratio, 0.725; 95% confidence interval, 0.557–0.944; p = 0.014). The optimum maximum TTS based on AUC was 21.5 weeks. The qualitative analysis showed a continuous drop of MCID rates with increasing TTS, with values > 80% until week 14.
Conclusion Our findings suggest that longer TTS is associated with a poorer patient-reported outcome in terms of functional impairment, and that—depending on the calculation method and according to the literature—a maximum TTS of between 14 to 22 weeks should likely be aimed for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Marc L Schröder
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bergman Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Victor E Staartjes
- Department of Neurosurgery, Bergman Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ford JJ, Kaddour O, Page P, Richards MC, McMeeken JM, Hahne AJ. A multivariate prognostic model for pain and activity limitation in people undergoing lumbar discectomy. Br J Neurosurg 2020; 34:381-387. [PMID: 32216592 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1742288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify a multivariate predictive model for 6-month outcomes on overall pain, leg pain and activity limitation in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy. Identification of predictors of outcome for lumbar discectomy has the potential to assist identifying treatment targets, clinical decision making and disease understanding.Materials and methods: Prospective cohort design. Ninety-seven patients deemed by study surgeons to be suitable for lumbar discectomy completed a comprehensive clinical and radiological baseline assessment. At 6-months post surgery outcome measures of overall and leg pain (visual analogue scale) as well as activity limitation (Oswestry Disability Index) were completed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the best multivariate predictive model of outcome.Results: In the multivariate model, presence of a compensation claim, longer duration of injury and presence of below knee pain and/or parasthesia were negative prognostic indicators for at least two of the outcomes. Peripheralization in response to mechanical loading strategies was a positive prognostic indicator for overall pain and leg pain. A range of other prognostic indicators for one outcome were also identified. The prognostic model explained up to 32% of the variance in outcome.Conclusions: An 11-factor prognostic model was identified from a range of clinically and radiologically assessed variables in accordance with a biopsychosocial model. The multivariate model has potential implications for researchers and practitioners in the field. Further high quality research is required to externally validate the prognostic model, evaluate effect of the identified prognostic factors on treatment effectiveness and explore potential mechanisms of effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon J Ford
- College of Science, Health & Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.,Advance Healthcare, Boronia, Australia
| | | | - Patrick Page
- Box Hill Radiology, Epworth Eastern Hospital, Box Hill, Australia
| | - Matthew C Richards
- College of Science, Health & Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.,Advance Healthcare, Boronia, Australia
| | - Joan M McMeeken
- Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Andrew J Hahne
- College of Science, Health & Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Middlebrook A, Bekker S, Middlebrook N, Rushton AB. Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e033429. [PMID: 32217559 PMCID: PMC7170562 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are a common musculoskeletal complication and can cause significant reduction in patient function and quality of life. Many undergo ACL reconstruction, with high-quality rehabilitation key to successful outcome. Knowledge of physical prognostic factors, such as quadriceps strength, is crucial to inform rehabilitation and has important implications for outcome following ACL reconstruction. However, these factors predicting outcome are poorly defined. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to establish physical prognostic factors predictive of outcome in adults following ACL reconstruction. Outcome will be subdivided into two groups of outcome measures, patient-reported and performance-based. Physical prognostic factors of interest will reflect a range of domains and may be modifiable/non-modifiable. Results will help decide most appropriate management and assist in planning and tailoring preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This systematic review protocol is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE databases, key journals and grey literature will be searched from inception to July 2019. Prospective cohort studies including participants aged ≥16 years who have undergone ACL reconstruction will be included, with articles focusing on multi-ligament reconstructions and ACL repair surgery, or not published in English excluded. Two independent reviewers will conduct searches, assess study eligibility, extract data, assess risk of bias (Quality in Prognostic Studies tool) and quantify overall quality of evidence (modified Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines). If possible, a meta-analysis will be conducted, otherwise a narrative synthesis will ensue focusing on prognostic factors, risk of bias of included studies and strength of association with outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at conferences and locally to physiotherapy departments. Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019127732.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nicola Middlebrook
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alison B Rushton
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Blinder H, Momoli F, Bokhaut J, Bacal V, Goldberg R, Radhakrishnan D, Katz SL. Predictors of adherence to positive airway pressure therapy in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med 2020; 69:19-33. [PMID: 32045851 DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2019.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While positive airway pressure (PAP) is effective for treating sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in children, adherence is poor. Studies evaluating predictors of PAP adherence have inconsistent findings, and no rigorous reviews have been conducted. This systematic review aims to summarize the literature on predictors of PAP therapy adherence in children. METHODS Studies evaluating baseline predictors of PAP therapy adherence in children (≤20 years) with SDB were included. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the last four years of conference abstracts. Results were described narratively, with random-effects meta-analyses performed where feasible. Risk of bias and confidence in the evidence were assessed. RESULTS We identified 50 factors evaluated across 28 studies (21 full text articles, seven abstracts). The highest rates of PAP therapy adherence were most consistently found with female sex, younger age, Caucasian race, higher maternal education, greater baseline apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), and presence of developmental delay. Pooled estimates included odds ratios of 1.48 (95%CI: 0.75-2.93) favoring female sex, 1.26 (95%CI: 0.68-2.36) favoring Caucasian race, and a mean difference in AHI of 4.32 (95%CI: -0.61-9.26) events/hour between adherent and non-adherent groups. There was low quality evidence to suggest that psychosocial factors like health cognitions and family environment may predict adherence. CONCLUSION In this novel systematic review, we identified several factors associated with increased odds of PAP therapy adherence in children. These findings may help guide clinicians to identify and support children less likely to adhere to PAP therapy and should be considered when developing interventions to improve adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrietta Blinder
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 5B2, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
| | - Franco Momoli
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 5B2, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 5Z3, Canada.
| | - Julia Bokhaut
- Division of Respirology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada.
| | - Vanessa Bacal
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 5Z3, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada.
| | - Reuben Goldberg
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 5B2, Canada; Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada.
| | - Dhenuka Radhakrishnan
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 5B2, Canada; Division of Respirology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada; ICES uOttawa, Ottawa Hospital - Civic Campus, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4E9, Canada.
| | - Sherri L Katz
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 5B2, Canada; Division of Respirology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Clinical course of pain and disability following primary lumbar discectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2020; 29:1660-1670. [PMID: 31916000 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06272-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To conduct a meta-analysis to describe clinical course of pain and disability in adult patients post-lumbar discectomy (PROSPERO: CRD42015020806). METHODS Sensitive topic-based search strategy designed for individual databases was conducted. Patients (> 16 years) following first-time lumbar discectomy for sciatica/radiculopathy with no complications, investigated in inception (point of surgery) prospective cohort studies, were included. Studies including revision surgery or not published in English were excluded. Two reviewers independently searched information sources, assessed eligibility at title/abstract and full-text stages, extracted data, assessed risk of bias (modified QUIPs) and assessed GRADE. Authors were contacted to request raw data where data/variance data were missing. Meta-analyses evaluated outcomes at all available time points using the variance-weighted mean in random-effect meta-analyses. Means and 95% CIs were plotted over time for measurements reported on outcomes of leg pain, back pain and disability. RESULTS A total of 87 studies (n = 31,034) at risk of bias (49 moderate, 38 high) were included. Clinically relevant improvements immediately following surgery (> MCID) for leg pain (0-10, mean before surgery 7.04, 50 studies, n = 14,910 participants) and disability were identified (0-100, mean before surgery 53.33, 48 studies, n = 15,037). Back pain also improved (0-10, mean before surgery 4.72, 53 studies, n = 14,877). Improvement in all outcomes was maintained (to 7 years). Meta-regression analyses to assess the relationship between outcome data and a priori potential covariates found preoperative back pain and disability predictive for outcome. CONCLUSION Moderate-level evidence supports clinically relevant immediate improvement in leg pain and disability following lumbar discectomy with accompanying improvements in back pain. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Collapse
|
28
|
Siccoli A, Staartjes VE, de Wispelaere MP, Schröder ML. Association of time to surgery with leg pain after lumbar discectomy: is delayed surgery detrimental? J Neurosurg Spine 2019; 32:160-167. [PMID: 31653820 DOI: 10.3171/2019.8.spine19613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE While it has been established that lumbar discectomy should only be performed after a certain waiting period unless neurological deficits are present, little is known about the association of late surgery with outcome. Using data from a prospective registry, the authors aimed to quantify the association of time to surgery (TTS) with leg pain outcome after lumbar discectomy and to identify a maximum TTS cutoff anchored to the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). METHODS TTS was defined as the time from the onset of leg pain caused by radiculopathy to the time of surgery in weeks. MCID was defined as a minimum 30% reduction in the numeric rating scale score for leg pain from baseline to 12 months. A Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to quantify the association of TTS with MCID. Maximum TTS cutoffs were derived both quantitatively, anchored to the area under the curve (AUC), and qualitatively, based on cutoff-specific MCID rates. RESULTS From a prospective registry, 372 patients who had undergone first-time tubular microdiscectomy were identified; 308 of these patients (83%) obtained an MCID. Attaining an MCID was associated with a shorter TTS (HR 0.718, 95% CI 0.546-0.945, p = 0.018). Effect size was preserved after adjustment for potential confounders. The optimal maximum TTS was estimated at 23.5 weeks based on the AUC, while the cutoff-specific method suggested 24 weeks. Discectomy after this cutoff starts to yield MCID rates under 80%. The 24-week cutoff also coincided with the time point after which the specificity for MCID first drops below 50% and after which the negative predictive value for nonattainment of MCID first surpasses ≥ 20%. CONCLUSIONS The study findings suggest that late lumbar discectomy is linked with poorer patient-reported outcomes and that-in accordance with the literature-a maximum TTS of 6 months should be aimed for.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victor E Staartjes
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Bergman Clinics.,2Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Neurosurgery, Amsterdam Movement Sciences.,3Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rushton A, Zoulas K, Powell A, Staal JB. Correction to: Physical prognostic factors predicting outcome following lumbar discectomy surgery: systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19:372. [PMID: 30322382 PMCID: PMC6190661 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2288-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Rushton
- Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain [CPR Spine] School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| | | | | | - J B Staal
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.,Research group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|