Re-infection rates and clinical outcomes following arthrodesis with intramedullary nail and external fixator for infected knee prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Antiseptics' Concentration, Combination, and Exposure Time on Bacterial and Fungal Biofilm Eradication

Background

This study aims to assess the activity of solutions containing povidone-iodine (PI) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) alone or combined on the biofilm of microbial species in the contest of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods

Different antiseptic solutions were tested on 2-day-old biofilms of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi at 1 and 3 minutes of exposure. The efficacy of these solutions was evaluated by measuring the biofilm metabolic activity by methoxynitrosulfophenyl-tetrazolium carboxanilide (XTT) reduction assay. The anti-biofilm effect of 5% PI and 0.3% PI + 0.5% H2O2 was tested on a 5-day-old biofilm using colony-forming unit counts and an XTT reduction assay.

Results

PI and H2O2 solutions showed concentration-dependent anti-biofilm activity except for E. faecalis. PI at 5% was the most active solution against the 2-day-old biofilm of all test microorganisms. The 0.3% PI + 0.5% H₂O₂ solution had a significant effect only at 3 minutes. The 5% PI and 0.3% PI + 0.5% H₂O₂ effect was evaluated on 5-day-old biofilms. PI at 5% produced a significant reduction in metabolic activity at both 1 and 3 minutes; 0.3% PI + 0.5% H₂O₂ caused a significant activity against all Gram-positive strains after 3 minutes, with a greater metabolic activity reduction than 5% PI.

Conclusions

In the case of PJI caused by Gram-positive bacteria, 0.3% PI + 0.5% H₂O₂ could be used for wound irrigation for 3 minutes of exposure. In the case of PJI with a different etiological agent or PJI with an unknown etiology, it is advisable to use 5% PI for 1 minute of exposure.

Synovial calprotectin in prosthetic joint infection. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Calprotectin is a protein endowed with antimicrobial properties, rendering it a distinctive marker for infection. Two methods are currently available for the assay of calprotectin: the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the lateral flow test (LFT). We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid calprotectin and to compare the accuracy of the laboratory-based test and the qualitative assessment for the diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic infection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched (from inception to November 2023) MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane for studies on calprotectin in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR), and diagnostic odds ratio were analyzed. The receiver-operating curve for each method was calculated.

RESULTS

We included 14 articles in our meta-analysis, including 902 patients who underwent total hip and knee arthroplasties revision; 331 (37%) had a joint infection according to MSIS, MSIS-modified criteria, ICM 2018 and EBJIS 2021. Considering the false-positive result rate of 6% and false-negative result rate of 7%, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94) and 0.93 (0.91-0.95), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% CI 0.91-0.94). No statistical differences in terms of sensitivity and specificity were found between ELISA and LFT. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the two calprotectin assessment methods were: LFT 0.90 (95% CI 0.869-0.935) and 0.92 (95% CI 0.894-0.941), respectively; ELISA 0.96 (95% CI 0.914-0.986) and 0.97 (95% CI 0.934-0.988), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio of the ELISA was superior to that of the LFT (906.6667, 95% CI 271.2686-3030.3712 versus 113.8886, 95% CI 70.4001-184.2414; p < 0.001). The AUC for ELISA and LFT was 0.968 (95% CI 0.944-0.984) and 0.915 (95% CI 0.895-0.933), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of synovial calprotectin is an accurate test for diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic infections. The diagnostic accuracy of the two calprotectin assessment methods is almost comparable. The LFT is a valid, rapid, and more available diagnostic tool, particularly to rule out PJI.

The Effect of Spacer Treatment of Infected Hip and Knee Arthroplasties on Patients' Mental Health: A Narrative Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The gold standard treatment for periprosthetic joint infections is the two-stage revision that includes the spacer placement before definitive reimplantation. The management of PJI affects patients' joint function and, subsequently, their mental health. Even though significant advances have been achieved, little to no attention has been paid to the psychological implications. So, based on standardized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), this study aimed to clarify the effect of spacer treatment of infected hip and knee arthroplasties on patients' mental health.

METHODS

We performed research on the literature on PJIs in the English language using the MEDLINE database with the search strings "spacer" OR "spacers" AND "hip" OR "knee" AND "SF-12" OR "SF-36" OR "EQ-5" OR "mental" OR "depression" OR "anxiety." The reference lists of selected articles were also hand-searched for any additional articles.

RESULTS

A total of 973 published papers were extracted, and 9 papers were finally included. A total of 384 patients who underwent spacer placement for PJI were identified. Of these 384 patients, 54% were female. The mean age ranged from 62 to 78.2 years. Of the11 papers identified for this review, 4 analyzed only hip spacers, including 119 patients; 4 only knee spacers, evaluating 153 patients; while a single study included 112 patients for both joints.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with the spacer are living in a state of mental upset, albeit better than the preoperative state. Clinical improvement with the review is not assured. The alteration of mental state turns out not to be transient for all the patients.

Role of bariatric surgery in reducing periprosthetic joint infections in total knee arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity represents an epidemic of rising numbers worldwide year after year. In the Orthopedic field, obesity is one of the major causes leading to osteoarthritis needing Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA). Still, contextually, it represents one of the most significant risk factors for joint replacement complications and failures. So, bariatric Surgery (BS) is becoming a valuable option for weight control and mitigating obesity-related risk factors. This review of the literature and meta-analysis aims to evaluate periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) and surgical site infections (SSI) rates in patients who underwent TKA after BS compared to obese patients without BS.

METHODS

Systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines up to October 2023. We included longitudinal studies comparing obese patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty after bariatric surgery (study group) and obese patients who underwent TKA (control group). The surgical site infection and Periprosthetic joint infection rate were compared among groups using a meta-analytical approach.

RESULTS

The online database and references investigation identified one hundred and twenty-five studies. PJI rate differed significantly among groups, (z = -21.8928, p < 0.0001), with a lower risk in the BS group (z = -10.3114, p < 0.0001), for SSI, instead, not statistically significance were recorded (z = -0.6784, p = 0.4975).

CONCLUSIONS

The current Literature suggests that Bariatric Surgery can reduce infectious complications in TKA, leading to better outcomes and less related costs treating of knee osteoarthritis in obese patients.

Transfemoral amputation versus knee arthrodesis for failed total knee replacement: A systematic review of outcomes

BACKGROUND

The options available to salvage a failed total knee replacement (TKR) include transfemoral amputation (TFA) and knee arthrodesis (KA). This systematic review aims to evaluate outcomes following either TFA or KA, comparing ambulatory status, additional subsequent surgery, postoperative infection, pain, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and mortality rate.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in EMBASE, Ovid Medline, and PubMed. Only primary research studies were included and data were independently extracted using a standardized form. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Forty-four papers were included, comprising 470 TFA and 1034 KA patients. The methodological quality of the studies was moderate. No TFA versus KA randomized controlled trials could be identified. Pooled data totals via subgroup analyses were performed, owing to inconsistent reporting methods in the included studies. Prosthesis use rate by TFA patients was 157/316 = 49.7%. Significant differences included that TFA patients had lower rates of ambulatory capacity than KA patients (139/294 = 45.6% versus 248/287 = 86.4%, p < 0.001), TFA ambulators were less likely to use an ambulatory aid (55/135 = 40.7% versus 167/232 = 72.0%, p < 0.001), and TFA was associated with a greater postoperative infection rate than KA (29/118 = 24.6% versus 129/650 = 17.2%, p = 0.054). There was a similar rate of revision surgery between TFA and KA (37/183 = 20.2% versus 145/780 = 18.6%, p = 0.612). Data on HRQoL for both TFA and KA were limited, contradictory, and heterogeneous.

CONCLUSION

No randomized controlled trials comparing TFA versus KA exist;therefore, current data likely reflects substantial selection bias. The currently available evidence suggests that KA patients are significantly more likely to achieve independent bipedal ambulation than TFA patients. In both treatment cohorts, subsequent infection and revision surgery remain a relatively common occurrence.

Knee Arthrodesis with a Modular Silver-Coated Endoprosthesis for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty with Extensive Bone Loss: A Retrospective Case-Series Study

INTRODUCTION

Knee arthrodesis is a limb salvage intervention for persistent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) when revision total knee arthroplasty fails. Conventional arthrodesis techniques are associated with the increased rate of complications, especially in patients with extensive bone loss and extensor tendon deficiency.

METHODS

Eight patients with a modular silver-coated arthrodesis implant after failed exchange arthroplasty for infection, were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had significant bone loss, while 5 displayed extensor tendon deficiency. Survivorship, complications, leg length discrepancy, median Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oxford Knee score (OKS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median follow up was 32 months (range 24-59 months). The survivorship rate of the prosthesis was 86% during the minimum time of follow up of 24 months. In one patient recurrence of the infection was observed and above-knee amputation was performed. The median postoperative leg length discrepancy was 2.07 ± 0.67 cm. Patients were able to ambulate with mild or no pain. The median VAS and OKS was 2.14 ± 0.9 and 34.7 ± 9.3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study demonstrated that knee arthrodesis with a silver coated arthrodesis implant, performed for persistent PJI in patients with significant bone loss and extensor tendon deficit, provided a stable construct, allowed eradication of infection and was associated with good functional outcome.

The impact of knee arthrodesis on gait kinematics, muscle activity and patient-reported outcome

BACKGROUND

The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze gait kinematicsandoutcome parameters after knee arthrodesis.

METHODS

Fifteenpatients with a mean follow-up of 5.9 (range0.8-36) years after unilateral knee arthrodesis were included. A 3D gait analysis was performed and compared to a healthy control group of14patients. Comparative electromyography was performed bilaterally at the rectus femoris, vastuslateralis/medialisand tibialis anterior muscles. The assessment further included standardized outcome scores- Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) andShort Form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

The 3D analysis showed a significantly shortened stance phase (p = 0.000), an extended swing phase (p = 0.000), and an increased time per step (p = 0.009) for the operated side compared with thenonoperatedside. There were statistically significant differences in the extent of movement of the hips, knees and ankles among the operated andnonoperatedsides and the control group. For the mean EMG measurement, no significant difference was found between the healthy control group and the patients with arthrodesis.The average LEFSscorewas 27.5 ± 10.6out of a maximum of 80 points,and the mean physical total scale and mean emotional total scale scores for the SF-36 were 27.9 ± 8.5and 52.9 ± 9.9, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthrodesis of the knee joint causes significant kinematic changes in gait pattern,and patients achieve poor results in subjective and functional outcomes(SF- 36, LEFS).Arthrodesis ensures that the extremities are preserved and can enable walking, but it must be viewed as a severe handicap for the patient.

Circular external fixation for knee fusion in complex indications

PURPOSE

Reconstructive surgery for complex knee problems is limited and challenging. The aim of this study is to report the technique, outcomes and complications of circular external fixation for knee fusion in complex indications.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of a complex limb reconstruction unit was done during December 2022. Patients with complex knee problems who underwent knee fusion with circular external fixator were included.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 63 ± 16.8 years. Deep infection was the indication for surgery in 11 patients (78.5%), of which 10 cases were related to previously failed revision arthroplasty. The mean duration of treatment in frame was 13 ± 4.1 months, while the mean follow-up duration following frame removal was 7.1 ± 4.2 years. Fusion was achieved in 13 patients (92.9%). The most common complication was pin site infection (6; 42.9%), of which three (21.4%) required pin/wire revision. One (7.1%) patient had fracture at the fusion site following frame removal that was treated with reapplication of the frame.

CONCLUSION

Knee fusion using circular external fixation is a reliable surgical option for complex knee problems especially in infected failed revision total knee replacements.

Outcomes of Modular Knee Arthrodesis for Challenging Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Classification and management options for prosthetic joint infection

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the major complications following arthroplasty implantation. Management of PJIs is a challenge for surgeons and various classification systems have been introduced, which consider variables such as onset of symptoms, pathogenesis and clinical manifestation. In an attempt to overcome the shortcomings which may limit their usefulness in borderline cases, a new classification system focusing on the topography of the infectious process has been proposed. This theory relies on the identification of the exact location of the bacterial colonization thus allowing to decide between a conservative or a more radical intervention irrespectively of the timing. The use of nuclear medicine device like radiolabelled white blood cells (WBC) scan could lead the path in identifying pathogenetic processes and their exact location thus guiding orthopaedic surgeons to the most appropriate diagnosis and treatment options. Currently management relies on debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR), which is traditionally performed at early stages, 1- or 2-stage revision arthroplasty which is commonly limited to chronic cases. Reports have demonstrated similar rates of infection recurrence following one and two-stage revisions, and the use of one-stage revision surgery is gaining popularity. More recently, satisfying results following partial implant retention during revision total arthroplasty for septic failures have been reported. In addition, in severe cases, definitive articulating antibiotic spacer, excision arthroplasty, arthrodesis or amputation can be performed.

Does the Implementation of the PRO-IMPLANT Foundation Treatment Algorithm Improve the Outcome of Chronic Periprosthetic Knee Infections? Mid-Term Results of a Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Several treatment options for chronic periprosthetic joint infections have been published in the current literature, with an on-going discussion to determine effective management algorithms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes of the two-stage exchange procedure in revision TKA prior to and after implementation of the PRO-IMPLANT Foundation treatment algorithm. The primary endpoints were defined as (i) revisions during the interval time, (ii) duration of the interval time and (iii) successful PJI eradication.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 02/2013 and 09/2016, 122 patients were included in a single-centre cohort analysis. 55 patients were treated according to the previously used algorithm (K1) and 67 according to the PRO-IMPLANT Foundation algorithm (K2). A minimum follow-up period of 3 years was set as the inclusion criterion. Successful eradication of infection was defined in accordance with the consensus criteria by Diaz-Ledezma et al. RESULTS: Successful eradication was achieved in 42 (67%) patients in K1 and 47 (85.5%) in K2 (p ≤ 0.005). The mean interval time was 88 days (range 51 - 353) in K1 and 52 days (range 42 - 126) in K2 (p ≤ 0.005). In K1, a mean of 0.8 (range 0 - 6) revisions were necessary during the interval period compared with 0.5 (range 0 - 4) in K2 (p = 0.066).

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the PRO-IMPLANT treatment algorithm led to significant improvement in the outcome of periprosthetic joint infections. During mid-term follow-up, infection eradication was highly successful, with decreases in the interval time as well as the number of revisions.

Two-Stage Exchange Using a Short Intramedullary Nail for Treatment of Periprosthetic Knee Infections: A Technique Worth Questioning

Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are serious orthopaedic complications that pose marked burdens to both patients and health care systems. At our institution, two-stage exchange with a temporary short antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary nail was utilized for the treatment of repeat PJIs in a series of compromised patients with considerable bone loss. This study reports on (1) success rates, (2) functional and pain outcomes, (3) and complications for patients receiving a temporary short intramedullary nail for the treatment of PJI. Our institutional database was queried for all repeat knee PJI patients between March 1st, 2009 and February 28th, 2015. Patients with type II/III Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) bone defects who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty with a short antibiotic-coated intramedullary nail were included for analysis (n = 31). Treatment success was determined using the Delphi-based consensus definition of a successfully treated PJI: infection eradication (healed wound with no recurrence of infection by the same organism), no further surgical intervention for infection after reimplantation, and no PJI-related mortality. A paired t-test was performed to assess for continuous variables. A total of 26 patients went on to reimplantation, while 5 patients retained the intramedullary nail. Overall treatment success was 74.2%. Range of motion significantly decreased postoperatively (102.1 vs. 87.3 degrees; p < 0.001), while Knee Society Scores (function) significantly increased (55.6 vs. 77.7, p < 0.001). A majority of patients were full weight-bearing immediately following surgery (38.7%). Treating poor health status patients with PJI of the knee can be difficult after multiple revisions. With a success rate similar to conventional methods, our results demonstrate that two-stage exchange with a temporary short intramedullary nail may be a desirable treatment option for patients with bony defects wishing to avoid amputation or permanent arthrodesis. However, this method does not outperform other treatment modalities, and may not be suitable for all patients. Patient expectations and health status should be carefully assessed to determine if this procedure is appropriate in this complex patient population.

Fusion rate of 89% after knee arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail: a mono-centric retrospective review of 48 cases

PURPOSE

Knee arthrodesis is an established procedure for limb salvage in cases of recurrent infection, total knee arthroplasty soft tissue defect, poor bone stock or a deficient extensor mechanism. Surgical options include compression plate, external fixator and arthrodesis nail. Different types of nail exist: long fusion nail, short modular nail and bridging nail. This study presents the results on knee arthrodesis using different types of intramedullary nails. The aim is to assess if a specific type of nail has a better fusion rate, clinical outcome and lower complication rate.

METHODS

A mono-centric retrospective study of 48 knees arthrodesis was performed between 2000 and 2018. 15 T2^™ Arthrodesis Nail, 6 OsteoBridge^® Knee Arthrodesis and 27 Wichita^® fusion nail were used. The mean clinic and radiological follow-up was 9.8 ± 3.8 years (2.6-18 years).

RESULTS

Fusion rate was 89.6%. Time to fusion was 6.9 months. Mean Parker score was 6.9/9 points. Visual Analogic Scale was 1.9. The Wichita^® fusion nail showed better results in terms of fusion, time to fusion and clinical outcome measured by Parker score and VAS but without statistical significance. The early revision rate was 10.4% and 20.8% presented a late complication requiring a surgery, due to nonunion or infection. 93.3% of infection was cured. Two patients live with a fistula (4.2%) and 1 was amputated (2.1%).

CONCLUSION

Although burdened by a big complication rate, knee arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail provides satisfactory results and is a good alternative to above-knee-amputation. The Wichita^® fusion nail shows a tendency to better results compared to the two other nails.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, level IV.

Modular knee arthrodesis secures limb, mobility, improves quality of life, and leads to high infection control in periprosthetic knee infection, when revision knee arthroplasty is not an option

INTRODUCTION

This study compared the outcome of knee arthrodesis versus hinged total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients suffering from periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

104 patients with PJI were treated using a two-stage exchange of failed TKA. In case of non reconstructable bone loss or loss of extension mechanism, a modular intramedullary arthrodesis nail was used for reimplantation [Knee Arthrodesis Module (KAM); n = 52]. The control group was retrospectively matched treated using a hinged revision TKA [Rotating Hinge Knee (RHK); n = 52]. PJI remission rates, functional outcome (WOMAC; KSS) and quality of life (SF-12), as well as comorbidities and pain were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean age was 72.5 years. Charlson Comorbidity Index was higher in the KAM group (3.3 vs. 2.8). PJI remission rate was 89.4% (88.5% vs. 90.4%, respectively). In case of reinfection, implant retention was mostly possible in the RHK group (7.7%), whereas amputations were mostly performed in the KAM group (9.6%). Significant pain reduction (VAS 7.9-2.8) was achieved in both groups. Walking distance was significantly reduced in the KAM groups versus the RHK group (504 vs. 1064 m). WOMAC and KSS function scores were significantly reduced in the KAM group (25 vs. 40 and 35 vs. 64). Only moderate reduction in quality of life in the KAM group was observed (SF-12 physical: 34 vs. 40; SF-12 mental: 51 vs. 56) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthrodesis using a modular intramedullary nail is an alternative for limb salvage, pain reduction, and preservation of quality of life and everyday mobility, when revision TKA is not an option. This study presents the largest number of case, comparing the outcome after performing an arthrodesis versus hinged TKA after septic failed TKA.

Functional Outcome of Patients Undergoing Knee Arthrodesis after Infected Total Arthroplasty

Objective  Retrospectively assess the functional outcome of patients undergoing arthrodesis after septic failure of total knee arthroplasty. Methods  Eighteen patients were evaluated, with a mean time of 3.7 years of follow-up. Arthrodesis surgery was performed using a narrow anterior dynamic compression plate, and medial or external fixator in two planes of the joint (Orthofix Bone Growth Therapy, Lewisville, TS, USA), at the surgeon's discretion. Results  The most frequent pathogen found was Staphylococcus aureus methicillin sensitive (38.9%). The mean lower limb discrepancy was 3.63 cm. The mean knee society score was 68 points. According to the visual analog scale for pain, 44% of the patients had a 0 score at the time of assessment, and 22.2% were very dissatisfied, despite the bone healing achieved. Patients were assessed for the ability to walk with or without assistance. Conclusion  Knee arthrodesis surgery was effective in controlling the infectious process and decreasing pain complaints, but satisfaction with the procedure was low.

Low complication rate and better results for intramedullary nail - arthrodesis for infected knee joints compared to external fixator-a series of one hundred fifty two patients

PURPOSE

Arthrodesis of the knee joint is still a salvage procedure after recurrent prosthetic joint infections (PJI) of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with substantial bone loss and seems to be a good solution to avoid amputation. Until now, intramedullary arthrodesis has increasingly been performed; no study has yet been published to compare these techniques after septic removal of TKA in terms of functional assessment and quality of daily life.

METHODS

In a single-centre retrospective setting, clinical and radiographic evaluation of consecutive patients after knee arthrodesis using intramedullary and external fixation for infected knee joints was performed. All patients were evaluated clinically, with x-ray and questionnaire including analysis regarding any complications at latest follow-up of a minimum 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

We included 152 patients (75 females, 77 males) in this study. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 63.6 years (range 12 to 90 years). The minimum follow-up was 12 months (mean 3.1 years, range 12 to 49 months). Arthrodesis with external fixator (83 patients, 52.2%) showed less blood loss and less peri-operative complications (1.6%) but a high rate of post-operative, pin-track infections (35.5%); loose pins (12.7%); and pin fractures (4.8%), and therefore risk factors for instability and nonunion (30.9%). Revision rate was 22.6% for arthrodesis with external fixator, and the primary union rate was 65.6%. Intramedullary arthrodesis (69 patients, 43.4%) showed a similar re-infection rate to external fixation (16.1% and 15.9%, respectively) but a significantly lower revision rate (5.4%, p < 0.001). Eighty percent of patients with intramedullary arthrodesis showed very good patient-related outcomes regarding pain, function and daily life activities in the questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Despite similar results regarding patient satisfaction and everyday competences in questionnaires, intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee is superior to the external fixator, as it results in fewer complications, lower revision rate, and union rates/loosening.

Knee arthrodesis as last resort for persistent knee joint infections : Comparison of extramedullary and intramedullary treatment

Background

Knee joint arthrodesis is an established treatment for periprosthetic infections (PPI) providing stability and pain relief. In this study the outcome after arthrodesis of the knee joint for persistent infections was compared and evaluated depending on the surgical procedure (intramedullary vs. extramedullary).

Material and methods

In a retrospective case analysis, all patients who underwent knee joint arthrodesis between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2016 were identified and divided into two groups: IMA and EMA. All patients were examined clinically and radiologically and the patient files were evaluated. In addition, the FIM score, the LEFS, the WHOQOL-BREF and NRS were evaluated.

Results

The median LEFS score for the IMA group was 26 points and in the EMA group 2 points (p = 0.03). The IMA patients showed a median pain scale at rest of 0 and during exercise of 2. The EMA group recorded a pain scale of 3 at rest and 5 during exercise (p = 0.28 at rest; p = 0.43 during exercise). In the IMA group the median postsurgical leg length difference was −2.0 cm and −2.5 cm in the EMA group (p = 0.31). At the end of the follow-up examinations, the FIM score of patients in the IMA group was 74.5 points and 22 points in the EMA group (p = 0.07).

Conclusion

The study showed that no arthrodesis procedure is obviously superior with respect to the postoperative outcome. The IMA combines advantages especially in the early phase after surgery in terms of function as well as patient comfort and is therefore currently the procedure of choice. The attending physician should be familiar with the advantages and disadvantages of the various procedures in order to be able to make an individual decision and thus maximize the chance of treatment success.

Periprosthetic complications of the extensor mechanism of the knee

Complications of the extensor mechanism after total knee arthroplasty are uncommon and present a challenge to the surgical team. No commonly accepted classifications or treatment strategies exist since these depend on institutional, national, and healthcare-system restrictions and possibilities. The goal of this chapter is to provide an overview of existing treatment options for the different possible scenarios. These treatment options reflect the experience of the author and do not display all possibilities available.

Prosthetic joint infection. A relevant public health issue

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a common complication of the knee and hip arthroplasty and represents a huge challenge for physicians. PJI raises serious social, economic and clinical concerns in the public health that need a comprehensive approach to better focus on proven strategies for disease prevention and treatment. History and clinical signs on joint site are useful means for suspecting PJI that need to be confirmed through major and minor diagnostic criteria. The pathogen isolation and the resulting antibiogram are crucial to guide the correct antibiotic strategy and together with surgical treatment (prosthesis revision and spacer implantation) represent the cornerstones to eradicate the infection before attempting a new arthroplasty. External fixator with removal of the spacer may be an option before performing a new arthroplasty when the infection does not heal. Arthrodesis may also be considered if the arthroplasty is contraindicated. Limb amputation is the last chance when pathogen eradication failed and might lead to life-threatening situations.

Knee Arthrodesis for Recurrent Periprosthetic Knee Infection

Knee arthrodesis for recurrent periprosthetic knee infection is a limb salvage procedure that simultaneously provides a stable limb for weight-bearing and effective eradication of the chronic infection. Knee arthrodesis is a final resort for limb salvage that is appropriate for patients with multiple recurrent revisions for infection, a history of failed 2-stage exchanges, medical comorbidities, and an inability to tolerate multiple additional procedures. Another important consideration is whether the patient has a poor soft-tissue envelope that leaves knee arthrodesis as the only viable option. The procedure is a definitive surgery to eliminate return trips to the operating room.

Description

This technique involves knee arthrodesis using a long intramedullary rod inserted proximally through the piriformis fossa that spans the entire medullary canal of the femur and the tibia. Before insertion, the surgeon may elect to create a long antibiotic cement-coated intramedullary rod. The rod is locked proximally and distally. An alternative method for large bone defects (>6 cm) at the level of the knee is to create intercalary antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers.

Alternatives

Alternative surgical treatments for this problem include above-the-knee amputation or resection arthroplasty, neither of which provides a functional limb for weight-bearing. The most common alternative methods for knee arthrodesis include external fixation using circular or biplanar frames, as well as short intramedullary modular rods.

Rationale

Knee arthrodesis using a long intramedullary rod is a very effective and efficient method of fusion. With recurrent periprosthetic knee infections, metaphyseal bone loss is common and short knee-fusion rods may not provide adequate stability. Long rods for knee arthrodesis use the diaphysis for stability and have the additional advantage of being easily accessible for removal in the event of a recurrent infection with a well-healed fusion. Long intramedullary rods also provide the additional advantages of immediate weight-bearing. Immediate weight-bearing on the affected limb is critical because often these patients have been unable to bear weight preoperatively secondary to pain and infection. External fixation techniques are effective but come with pin-site problems. Pin-site problems are amplified in patients with obesity who have large soft-tissue envelopes, and the long intramedullary rod avoids pin problems in such patients. Antibiotic cement coating of the long intramedullary rod also provides local antibiotic delivery.

Uniplanar versus biplanar monolateral external fixator knee arthrodesis after end-stage failed infected total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

External fixator knee arthrodesis is a salvage procedure used primarily in cases of end-stage infected total knee replacement (iTKR). Stable fixation combined with bone-end compression is essential to achieve knee fusion, but providing sufficient stability can be challenging in the presence of severe bone loss. Our hypothesis is that using an external fixation biplanar configuration would bring about a fusion rate superior to that of a monolateral frame.

METHODS

This study compares outcomes of biplanar external fixator knee fusion due to non-revisable iTKR with those of a historical cohort control study with patients managed with a monoplanar configuration. Primary endpoints were fusion rate, time to achieve bone fusion and infection eradication rate. Limb-length discrepancy, pain level, patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 29 knee fusion cases were included. In the biplanar group, infection was eradicated in 100% of the patients and fusion was achieved in all cases within an average of 5.24 months. In comparison, in the monolateral group, infection was eradicated in 86% of the cases and fusion was achieved in 81% of the patients after a mean of 10.3 months (p < 0.05). In both groups, postoperative pain was mild and patients expressed a high degree of satisfaction once fusion was achieved.

CONCLUSIONS

According to our data, external fixation knee fusion is a useful limb-salvage procedure in end-stage cases of knee PJI. We conclude that a biplanar configuration can halve the time required to achieve solid bone fusion in such a complex scenario.